Comminuted fractures of the radial head and neck: is fixation to the shaft necessary?

Mason type III fractures of the radial head are treated by open reduction and internal fixation, resection or prosthetic joint replacement. When internal fixation is performed, fixation of the radial head to the shaft is difficult and implant-related complications are common. Furthermore, problems of devascularisation of the radial head can result from fixation of the plate to the radial neck. In a small retrospective study, the treatment of Mason type III fractures with fixation of the radial neck in 13 cases (group 2) was compared with 12 cases where no fixation was performed (group 1). The mean clinical and radiological follow-up was four years (1 to 9). The Broberg-Morrey index showed excellent results in both groups. Degenerative radiological changes were seen more frequently in group 2, and removal of the implant was necessary in seven of 13 cases. Post-operative evaluation of these two different techniques revealed similar ranges of movement and functional scores. We propose that anatomical reconstruction of the radial head without metalwork fixation to the neck is preferable, and the outcome is the same as that achieved with the conventional technique. In addition degenerative changes of the elbow joint may develop less frequently, and implant removal is not necessary.     

Biomechanical analysis of bicondylar tibial plateau fixation: how does lateral locking plate fixation compare to dual plate fixation?

OBJECTIVES: This study is designed to test the comparative strength of lateral-only locked plating to medial and lateral nonlocked plating in a cadaveric model of a bicondylar proximal tibial plateau fracture. METHODS: Ten matched pairs of human cadaveric proximal tibia specimens were used for biomechanical testing. Cyclic loading using a materials testing device simulated initial range of motion and load bearing following surgical repair. Subsidence of the medial and the lateral condyles was measured following 10,000 cycles from 100N to 1,000N; the maximum load to failure on the medial condyle for both plate constructs was also measured. RESULTS: On the lateral side, dual plating (DP) allowed an average of 0.68 +/- 0.14 mm of subsidence, compared with 1.03 +/- 0.27 mm for the fixed-angle plate (FAP) (P = 0.077). On the medial side, DP allowed an average of 0.78 +/- 0.15 mm of subsidence, compared with 1.51 +/- 0.32 mm for the FAP (P = 0.045). No significant difference was found in the maximal load to medial condyle fixation failure between either plating construct (P = 0.204). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that dual-plate fixation allows less subsidence in this bicondylar tibial plateau cadaveric model when compared to isolated locked lateral plates. This may raise concerns about the widespread use of isolated lateral locked plate constructs in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.     

Risk of injury to the axillary nerve during antegrade proximal humeral blade nail fixation – An anatomical study

Introduction

The antegrade intramedullary Locking Blade Nail (Marquardt, Germany) is a device aimed at improving purchase in the humeral head and reducing varus displacement by providing medial buttress support and triangular stability within the humeral head. The aim of this study is to measure the relationship of the proximal fixation screws to the axillary nerve.

Methods

13 whole cadavers underwent insertion of an antegrade proximal humeral blade nail via a deltoid split approach to both shoulders. The anatomic proximity of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve to the screws was measured following soft tissue dissection and inspection of the nerve.

Results

The mean distance of the nerve from the anterolateral acromion was 62 mm (range 45–81 mm). The nerve lay closest to the distal blade fixation screw 4.9 mm (range 0–19 mm). In three cases the nerve lay directly underneath the washer and in all three cases there was macroscopic evidence of damage to the nerve. In 5 cases the nerve travelled obliquely in a cranial direction to lie 1.8 mm (range 0–3 mm) from the distal blade fixation screw, in 2 of these cases the nerve lay beneath the washer.

Conclusion

The anterior branch of the axillary nerve is placed at risk during insertion of the locking screws despite use of protection sleeves and trocars. We advocate that when using antegrade intramedullary nails that incorporate an inferomedial calcar screw an extended anterolateral acromial approach is undertaken.     

Posterior fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: Is it possible to protect one segment in the lumbar region?

Background

The treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures is controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare intermediate-segment (IS) and long-segment (LS) instrumentation in the treatment for these fractures.

Methods

IS instrumentation was considered as pedicle fixation two levels above and one level below the fractured vertebra (infra-laminar hooks attached to lower vertebra with pedicle screws). LS instrumentation was done two levels above and two levels below the fractured vertebra. Among a total of 25 consecutive patients, Group 1 included ten patients treated by IS pedicle fixation, whereas Group 2 included fifteen patients treated by LS instrumentation.

Results

The measurements of local kyphosis (p = 0.955), sagittal index (p = 0.128), anterior vertebral height compression (p = 0.230) and canal diameter expansion (p = 0.839) demonstrated similar improvement at the final follow-up between the two groups. However, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding clinical outcome [Hannover scoring system, Oswestry disability questionnaire and the range of motion of the lumbar region compared to neutral (0°)].

Conclusions

The radiographic parameters were the same between the two groups. However, the clinical parameters demonstrated that IS instrumentation is a more effective management of thoracolumbar burst fractures.     

What advantages does volar plate fixation have over K-wire fixation for distal radius extension fractures in the elderly?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) followed immediately by physiotherapy and of percutaneous K-wire-fixation and casting for unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients, considering the results both in general, for all such fractures, and selectively for A3 and C2 fractures. METHODS: Follow-up examinations were performed 26 (18-48) months after surgery in 43 patients (median age 67 (60-83) years) treated with K-wire fixation and 9 (5-17) months after surgery in 46 patients (median age 76 (60-90) years) treated with ORIF, and the outcome of each was recorded as Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Gartland-Werley and Castaing scores; the radiological loss of correction was also assessed. Statistical analysis was performed first without reference to the specific type of fracture for the K-wire- and the total ORIF -groups, and then selectively for A3 and C2 -fractures only; in the second analysis the patients were divided into three groups: KD, ORIF with and ORIF without angular stability. RESULTS: The Garland-Werley and Castaing scores do not indicate any significant difference between the procedures specified. According to the Garland-Werley score 37 patients (86%) treated by K-wire fixation and 39 (85%) treated by ORIF achieved "excellent" and "good" results; according to the Castaing score there were 33 (77%) "good" results after K-wire fixation and 34 (74%) good results after ORIF. The radiological loss of correction (K-wire fixation/ORIF) as measured by the radial inclination (median 2/2.5 degrees), the palmar tilt (median 3/5 degrees) and the radial shortening (median 1/1 degrees mm) do not differ significantly. Suboptimal radiological results do not always correlate with results that are only "fair" or "poor". The non-fracture-specific DASH score suggests a higher degree of patient satisfaction after K-wire fixation (7 [0-87] points) than after ORIF (17 [0-82] points), which is not confirmed by fracture-specific evaluation. There is a significantly earlier return to the "activities of daily living" (4 as against 8 weeks) after ORIF. CONCLUSION: All the treatments compared are suitable for the treatment of A3 and C2 fractures. The important advantages of ORIF are the early functional physiotherapy without casting and without obligatory second surgery and the earlier return to "activities of daily living", which are all of decisive importance for older patients, who are the ones most frequently affected.     

To fix or not to fix? The role of fibular fixation in distal shaft fractures of the leg

Background

The role of stabilisation of the fibula in distal two-bone fractures of the leg is controversial. Some studies indicate the need for fibular stabilisation in 43 AO fractures, but few studies consider the role of the fibula in 42 AO fractures. The aim of the current paper is to explain the role of stabilisation of the fibula in 42 AO fractures, correlating the rates of healing and non-union between patients with and without fibula fixation.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 patients with 42 AO (distal) shaft fracture of the tibia with associated fracture of the fibula were selected. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not the fibula was fixed: Group I (n = 26) comprised patients who had their fibula fixed while Group II (n = 34) comprised patients who did not. The fibular fracture was classified according to the AO and related to the level of the tibial fracture. Other parameters examined were the union rate of the two groups correlated to the fracture pattern and position of the fibular fracture; the demographic data, such as age and gender; the presence of an open fracture, and the type of tibial fixation device used (nail or plate).

Results

None of the parameters considered (open injury, AO classification, device used and level of the fibular fracture relative to the tibial) were shown to have an influence on the development of a non-union.

Conclusion

This study showed a higher non-union rate when the fracture of the tibia and fibula were at the same level, the tibia was fixed with a bridging plate and the fibula left untouched. For this reason, we recommend fibular fixation in all 42 distal fractures when both fractures lie on the same plane and the tibial fracture is relatively stabilised.     

Fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly: is internal fixation the treatment of choice?

The incidence of osteoporotic fractures of the distal humerus is increasing, and the treatment of these injuries merits closer review. We assessed the results of 28 elderly patients (29 fractures) with a mean age of 85 years (range, 75-100 years). Open reduction and internal fixation was done on 21 elbows, and eight elbows were treated nonoperatively. Orthopaedic Trauma Association grading showed that the group treated with internal fixation had favorable results (three excellent, nine good, seven fair, and two poor) compared with the nonoperatively treated group (zero excellent, two good, three fair, and three poor). Mean loss of extension and mean flexion were better in the surgically treated patients (23.5 degrees and 99 degrees ) than in the nonoperatively treated patients (33.5 degrees and 71 degrees ). Substantial pain relief (mild or no pain) was achieved in a higher proportion (52%) in the surgically treated group than in the nonoperatively treated group (25%). Anatomic restoration of distal humeral tilt and articular congruity also were better in the surgically treated patients. Rates of complications were observed to be comparable to those described in the literature for younger patients. These findings reflect the relevance of surgical fixation of such fractures in this age group highlighting the need for additional clinical studies.     

Does functional outcome depend on the quality of the fracture fixation? Mid to long term outcomes of ankle fractures at two university teaching hospitals

BackgroundThe aim of our study was to assess the adequacy of reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures and the long-term functional outcomes of patients treated in two university teaching hospitals by general orthopaedic surgeons.MethodWe performed a retrospective study involving two large trauma units in the UK, reviewing all operatively treated unstable ankle fractures performed in one centre between 1st October 2006 and 31st December 2007 and another centre between 1st January 2009 and 31st December 2009. All patients were contacted by postal follow up at a minimum of 6-years using the Olerud–Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).Results261 patients underwent operative treatment for ankle fractures during the study period at the two hospitals. 107 patients responded to the questionnaire. Analysis of patients’ functional outcome by fracture type reveals that the outcome scores decrease as the complexity of the ankle fracture increases. A significant finding within subgroup analysis found that trimalleolar fractures (B3) have worse outcomes than bimalleolar fractures (B2 and C); which in turn have worse outcomes than isolated lateral malleolar fractures (B1). Analyzing the outcome of patients based on the severity of malreduction revealed that Pettrone’s value was inversely proportional to the OMAS.ConclusionWe have found a significant reduction in patient reported function in patients whose fractures were malreduced at time of surgery.     

Septic arthritis of the major joints of the lower limb after periarticular external fixation application: are conventional safe corridors enough to prevent it?

Septic arthritis as a result of pin track infection, following application of external fixators in periarticular fractures of the lower limb, is a rare, but serious complication. Several studies, combining cadaver dissection and MRI scans or conventional X-ray measurements, have tried to define the exact anatomy of the capsular reflection in the major joints of the lower limb (hip, knee and ankle), in order to provide specific safe corridors for extra-capsular wire and pin placement. These studies are reviewed, their methods and results are presented, and their conclusions are evaluated as suggested guidelines for safe extra-capsular wire and pin insertion.     

Tibial Pilon fractures Internal plate fixation versus external wire fixation

A M ED LIN E search w as conducted to identify studiepublished betw een January 1998and January 2004usininternal plate fixation or external wire fixation for treatm ent of tibial Pilon fractures.The search strategy identified 20articles thatreportedoutcom…     

Letter to the Editor

Unwarranted demand for body parts of endan-gered animal species for treatment of male infer-tility     

Letters to the Editor

Dear Sir，Re:Letter to the Editor:Hands】s~IDJ田dWu FCW，AsianJ0u扭】ofA刀dr010留，2000;(2):78 1 wnle inl℃Ply to thea饮〕ve一men石(”led玩tter con-cemingmy涌cle entitied‘汀h化e new methods for malecontracep6on”in AJA，1，笋〕，l(4):161一167〔‘]. ft sllouldbeclear6℃nlthetitlethatmy田ticleisllola化view 1lleb韶ic idea of this ardcle was to allow thecOI们nlullity of andn〕1091出in the Asian region，wh。峨haVing an exha tough Problel们with tlnc0lltr0llable poPll-lation gr以甲山…     

Letters to the Editors

Regarding the article entitled: “No-scalpel vasectomy outside China” by Drs Bing XU and Wei-Dong HUANG of the Chongqing Li Shun-Qiang Andrology Hospital, I would like to draw the attention of readers of the joumal to an excellent training film made by Dr LI Shun-Qiang (Chengdu) with the funding support of WHO and AVSC. This film, entitled “No-scalpel Vasectomy”, illustrates the key points in the procedure and shows Dr Li‘s preferred technique. The film occupies 9-10 minutes and is available in PAL and SECAM format. It won an award from the British Surgical Society for its high quality and clarity.     

Comparison of the safety of three methods of lumbar transpedicular screw fixation

Objective: To choose a proper method of lumbar transpedicular screw fixation at different lumbar levels among the three methods (Roy-Camille's method, Magerl's method and Du's method) in the Chinese population. Methods: Three-dimensional ( 3-D ) images were reconstructed with image data of 42 adult lumbar segments that were scanned by Electron Beam CT. The three methods of lumbar pedicle screw fixation were simulated on the 3-D reconstructed images and the parameters of implanting pedicle screws were measured. Results : There was statistically significant difference at the distance from the entrance point to the pedicle axis between the three methods (P<0.001). The distances measured by Du's method were shortest from L1 to L4, and the distances measured by Magerl's method were shortest at L5 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference from L1 to L2 (P >0.05) but significant difference from L3 to L5 at inserting safe ranges of TSA (transverse section angle) was found between the three methods (P<0.05). From L3 to L4, the inserting safe ranges of TSA measured by Du's and Magerl's methods were significantly larger than that measured by Roy-Camille's method (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between them (P > 0.05). At L5, the inserting safe ranges of TSA measured by Magerl's method were largest among the three methods (P <0.05). Conclusions: Among the three methods, Du's method is the best choice from L1 to L4 because its distance from the entrance point to the pedicle axis is shortest and the safe range of TSA is largest: Magerl's method can be used from L3 to LS and is the best choice at L5; Roy-Camille's method is applicable at L1 and L2.