Delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplant recipients is associated with early pancreas allograft failure

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication associated with significant untoward effects in kidney‐alone transplantation. The incidence and outcomes following kidney delayed graft function (K‐DGF) among patients undergoing simultaneous pancreas‐kidney (SPK) transplantation are less certain. We analyzed SPK recipients transplanted at our center between January 1994 and December 2017. A total of 632 recipients fulfilled the selection criteria, including 69 (11%) with K‐DGF and 563 without. The incidence of K‐DGF was significantly higher in recipients of organs from older donors and donation after circulatory death (DCD). The presence of K‐DGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of pancreas graft failure during the first 90 days (n = 9, incidence rate [IR] 2.45/100 person‐months), but not with late pancreas failure (n = 32, IR 0.84/100 person‐months), kidney graft failure, or patient death. Although DCD was associated with K‐DGF, it was not associated with either pancreas (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.58‐1.44, P = .69) or kidney (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.66‐1.82, P = .74) graft failure after adjustment for potential confounders. We found K‐DGF to be a significant risk factor for pancreas graft failure but not kidney graft failure, with the major risk period being early (<90 days) posttransplant, and the major donor risk factor being older donor age.     

Duration of delayed graft function and outcomes after kidney transplantation from controlled donation after circulatory death donors: a retrospective study

The impact of the duration of delayed graft function (DGF) on graft survival is poorly characterized in controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor kidney transplantation. A retrospective analysis was performed on 225 DCD donor kidney transplants between 2011 and 2016. When patients with primary nonfunction were excluded (n = 9), 141 recipients (65%) had DGF, with median (IQR) duration of dialysis dependency of 6 (2–11.75) days. Longer duration of dialysis dependency was associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, and a higher rate of acute rejection. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, the presence of DGF was associated with lower graft survival (log‐rank test P = 0.034), though duration of DGF was not (P = 0.723). However, multivariable Cox regression analysis found that only acute rejection was independently associated with lower graft survival [HR (95% CI) 4.302 (1.617–11.450); P = 0.003], whereas the presence of DGF and DGF duration were not. In controlled DCD kidney transplantation, DGF duration itself may not be independently associated with graft survival; rather, it may be that acute rejection associated with prolonged DGF is the poor prognostic factor.     

Effect of delayed graft function on longer-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors in the United Kingdom: A national cohort study

Kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are utilized variably worldwide, in part due to high rates of delayed graft function (DGF) and putative associations with adverse longer-term outcomes. We aimed to determine whether the presence of DGF and its duration were associated with poor longer-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from DCD donors. Using the UK transplant registry, we identified 4714 kidney-only transplants from controlled DCD donors to adult recipients between 2006 and 2016; 2832 recipients (60·1%) had immediate graft function and 1882 (39·9%) had DGF. Of the 1847 recipients with DGF duration recorded, 926 (50·1%) had DGF < 7 days, 576 (31·2%) had DGF 7–14 days, and 345 (18·7%) had DGF >14 days. After risk adjustment, the presence of DGF was not associated with inferior long-term graft or patient survivals. However, DGF duration of >14 days was associated with an increased risk of death-censored graft failure (hazard ratio 1·7, p = ·001) and recipient death (hazard ratio 1·8, p < ·001) compared to grafts with immediate function. This study suggests that shorter periods of DGF have no adverse influence on graft or patient survival after DCD donor kidney transplantation and that DGF >14 days is a novel early biomarker for significantly worse longer-term outcomes.     

Elevated Preoperative Recipient Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Is Associated With Delayed Graft Function Following Kidney Transplantation

Introduction

The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indicator of inflammatory status. We studied the effect of preoperative elevated NLR in the recipient in relation to the risk of developing delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed the preoperative white blood cell count of renal transplant recipients between 2003 and 2005. An NLR >3.5 was considered elevated. There were 398 kidney transplant recipients of whom 249 received organs from donors after brain death (DBD), 61 from donors after circulatory death (DCD), and 88 from living donors.

Results

One hundred three patients (26%) developed DGF, of which 67 (65%) had NLRs >3.5. Of 295 recipients with primary graft function, only 44 (15%) had elevated NLR. Univariate analysis revealed three factors that significantly influenced graft function: NLR >3.5, cold ischemic time (CIT) >15 hours, and donor type. On multivariate analysis, both donor type (DCD: hazard ratio [HR] = 2.421, confidence interval [CI] = 1.195–4.905, P = .014; LD: HR = 0.289, CI = 0.099–0.846, P = .024) and NLR (HR = 10.673, CI = 6.151–18.518, P < .0001) remained significant.

Conclusions

Elevated recipient preoperative NLR could contribute to increase the risk of developing DGF, which appears to be more pronounced in patients receiving grafts from living donors.     

Risk factors for and outcomes of delayed graft function in live donor kidney transplantation – a retrospective study

Delayed graft function (DGF) in deceased donor kidney transplantation is associated with worse outcomes. DGF has been less well studied in live donor transplantation. We aimed to examine the risk factors for DGF, and associations between DGF and short‐ and long‐term outcomes in live donor kidney transplant recipients. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, we included live donor kidney transplants performed in Australia and New Zealand over 2004–2015 and excluded pediatric recipients (n = 440), pathological donors (n = 97), grafts that failed in the first week (as a proxy for primary non function; n = 38), and grafts with missing DGF data (n = 46). We used multivariable logistic regression to identify the risk factors for DGF and the association between DGF and rejection at 6 months; Cox proportional hazards models to examine the relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival; and linear regression to examine the association between DGF and eGFR at 1 year. DGF occurred in 77 (2.3%) of 3358 transplants. Risk factors for DGF included right‐sided kidney [odds ratio (OR) 2.00 (95% CI 1.18, 3.40)], donor BMI [OR 1.06 per kg/m² (95% CI 1.01, 1.12)]; increasing time on dialysis and total ischemic time [OR 1.09 per hour (1.00, 1.17)]. DGF was associated with increased risk of rejection at 6 months [OR 2.37 (95% CI 1.41, 3.97)], worse patient survival [HR 2.14 (95% CI 1.21, 3.80)] and graft survival [HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.27, 3.10)], and worse renal function at 1 year [Coefficient ‐9.57 (95% CI ?13.5, ?5.64)]. DGF is uncommon after live donor kidney transplantation, but associated with significantly worse outcomes. The only modifiable risk factors identified were kidney side and total ischemic time.     

Macrophage polarization in kidney transplant patients

BackgroundMacrophages can oscillate between two functionally distinct states: proinflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2. Classically- activated M1 macrophages produce proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-ƴ, and IL-6), which ares associated with graft dysfunction/rejections. In contrast, alternatively-activated macrophages M2 produce anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) that are involved in host defense, tissue repair/remodeling, debris scavenging, and immune regulation, thereby helps to improve long-term graft survival.MethodsIn this study, we have identified graft dysfunction or rejection by biopsies using immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry was used to detect M1 (CD163+, CD206+, and CD200R+) and M2 (CD86+, CD80+, and CD68+) macrophages. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure a panel of cytokines.ResultsHistological analysis of the kidney transplants (n = 30) was used to distinguish those with acute/chronic allograft rejection (n = 15) from those with stable kidney function (n = 15). Flow cytometry results showed that patients with graft rejection exhibited macrophages with decreased expression (33.28%) of M2 macrophage markers (CD163+, CD206+, and CD200R+) and reduced production of IL-10 (as detected using ELISA). However, 71.33% of the macrophages were found to have M1 markers (CD86+, CD80+, and CD68+; p = 0.002) and produced proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-ƴ, and IL-6) by ELISA (p = 0.001) when compared with the healthy control group. In contrast, stable kidney transplants had 65.58% M2 and 27.66% M1 macrophages (p = 0.03) and produced IL-10. These findings suggest that M1 macrophages dominate in kidney grafts with dysfunction or rejection, whereas M2 macrophages dominate in kidney grafts with stable function.ConclusionOur observations implicate a major shift towards M2 macrophages in stable kidney transplants, which are markedly downregulated in patients with graft dysfunction or rejection. In contrast, an increased frequency of M1 macrophages remained dominant in the pathophysiology of kidney transplants undergoing active dysfunction or rejection.     

Dynamics of early post‐operative plasma ddcfDNA levels in kidney transplantation: a single‐center pilot study

Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (ddcfDNA) is reported to be a promising noninvasive biomarker for acute rejection in organ transplant. However, studies on monitoring ddcfDNA dynamics during the early periods after organ transplantation are scarce. Our study assessed the dynamic variation in ddcfDNA in early period with various types and status of kidney transplantation. Target region capture sequencing used identifies ddcfDNA level in 21 kidney transplant recipients. Median ddcfDNA level was 20.69% at the initial time post‐transplant, and decreased to 5.22% on the first day and stayed at the stable level after the second day. The ddcfDNA level in DCD (deceased donors) group (44.99%) was significantly higher than that in LDRT (living donor) group (10.24%) at initial time, P < 0.01. DdcfDNA level in DGF (delayed graft function) recipients was lower (23.96%) than that in non‐DGF (47.74%) at the initial time, P = 0.89 (19.34% in DGF and 4.46% in non‐DGF on the first day, P = 0.17). DdcfDNA level at initial time significantly correlated with serum creatinine (r² = 0.219, P = 0.032) and warm ischemia time (r² = 0.204, P = 0.040). Plasma ddcfDNA level decreased rapidly follow an L‐shaped curve post‐transplant, and level in DGF declined slower than non‐DGF. The rebound of ddcfDNA level may indicate the occurrence of acute rejection.     

Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Stratified by Histologic Biopsy Findings

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of graft failure. We studied the histologic findings among adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 2000 and June 2015 who had DGF and had a kidney biopsy within 14 days of transplant. Death censored graft failure (DCGF) and death at 1 and 3 years after transplant were examined. A total of 269 transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria, of which 152 (56.51%) had acute tubular necrosis (ATN), 44 (16.4%) had acute rejection (AR), mainly T-cell mediated rejection (n = 31), 35 (13%) had ATN with AR (mainly T-cell mediated rejection, n = 26), and 38 (14.1%) had other pathology. Compared with those with ATN alone, kidney transplant recipients with AR alone had a significantly higher risk of DCGF at 1 year post transplant (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.70; 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.5; P = .006). Those with AR alone had an increased risk of DCGF at 3 years post transplant (hazard ratio = 3.10; 95% confidence interval 1.3-8.5; P = .01) in crude analyses. There was no association between DGF etiology and mortality. Early renal biopsy can be used to distinguish AR, which has protocolized treatments, from other etiologies. This could potentially alter allograft survival within 1 year of transplant complicated by DGF.     

Induction with ATG in DCD kidney transplantation; efficacy and relation of dose and cell markers on delayed graft function and renal function

AimWe aimed to analyse the efficacy of the Thymoglobulin dose used for induction in controlled DCD kidneys, and its initial impact on blood cell and CD3 count, as predictors of efficacy.Methods140 DCD patients who received ATG induction, were analysed. Intended dose was 1.25 mg/kg/day over 5 days, rounded to nearest 25 mg and not exceeding 125 mg/dose. Outcomes included the total dose in relation with rejection, DGF, graft survival, eGFR. The cell count response to ATG was assessed as predictors of outcome.ResultsGraft survival, was 96.2%, 92.4%, 85% at 1, 3 and 5 years. Rejection was 7% at 1 year and associated with eGFR at 3 (p = 0.003) and 5 years. ATG dose was not predictive of rejection but was associated with the day5 leucocyte and lymphocyte count (p < 0.001) and negatively with DGF (p = 0.05). In 31 patients day3 CD3 count was available and it was associated with rejection (p = 0.002), less DGF (p = 0.09), and 3 years eGFR (p = 0.01).ConclusionThymoglobulin provides excellent results in DCD kidneys that do not significantly differ with small dose variations. In higher doses it reduces DGF. Lymphocytes and CD3 count, may be useful surrogate markers of efficacy and outcome.     

Total Cell-Free DNA as a Noninvasive Biomarker of a Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

BackgroundBecause of the organ shortage, donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplantation (KTx) is an alternative way of achieving KTx using brain-dead donors (BDs). Although the prognosis of DCD-KTx is improving, the graft suffers from delayed graft function (DGF), the management of which is essential. With progress in understanding the characteristics of cell-free DNA (CF-DNA), we consider plasma total CF-DNA (tCF-DNA) to be a useful biomarker for predicting DGF in DCD-KTx.Study Design and MethodConsecutive patients from living donors (LDs; n = 9), BDs (n = 8), or DCD donors (n = 13) were enrolled. Plasma samples were collected after KTx and on postoperative days 3 and 5. CF-DNA was isolated, and tCF-DNA was quantified using the TapeStation 2200 software program.ResultsThe tCF-DNA levels after BD-KTx and DCD-KTx were higher than those after LD-KTx (LD, 78 ± 27 (ng/mL); BD, 99 ± 20; DCD, 150 ± 23); the difference between DCD-KTx and LD-KTx was statistically significant (P < .05). The tCF-DNA levels declined at postoperative day 5 (LD, 45 ± 10; BD, 51 ± 11; DCD, 66 ± 13). tCF-DNA levels were significantly increased in patients with DGF after KTx (DGF, 139 ± 22; immediate function, 91 ± 18; P < .05). The tCF-DNA level was correlated with the duration of DGF (r = 0.5825, P < .05).ConclusionAlthough the mechanism underlying DNA release from transplanted grafts into the recipient circulation remains unclear, cell death by apoptosis or necrosis and the active secretion of the immune system may play important roles in DGF. These data suggest that monitoring tCF-DNA may help predict graft recovery after DCD-KTx.     

Procurement Biopsies Can Predict Unfavorable Outcomes in Kidneys With Low MAPI Score Values

BackgroundThere are few reports about the usefulness of Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index (MAPI) score in procurement biopsies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between histopathological analysis according to MAPI and unfavorable outcomes in the first year after kidney transplantation (KT).MethodsThis retrospective study included deceased-donor KT patients whose grafts were biopsied before transplantation and had low MAPI scores (<8) in frozen sections (FSs). Paraffin sections (PSs) were analyzed after KT. MAPI parameters were global glomerulosclerosis in more than 15% (2 patients), periglomerular fibrosis (4 patients), wall-lumen ratio of arteries >0.5 (2 patients), arteriolar hyalinosis (4 patients), and interstitial scar (3 patients). Multivariable models were used to analyze risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF), prolonged DGF, inferior renal function, and graft loss (P < .05).ResultsOne hundred fifty-nine KTs were included. Donors (n = 120) were predominantly men (70%) and young adults (37.68 ± 12.50 years old) who suffered a traumatic death (55.8%). Recipients were predominantly men (62.26%) and adults (45.70 ± 15.80 years old) with kidney disease of unknown etiology (39.6%). Low rates of agreement between FS and PS were observed for all MAPI criteria, with kappa values ranging from 0.28 to 0.51. Using FS, no histologic parameter was independently associated with outcomes. After adjustment, glomerulosclerosis was an independent risk factor for prolonged DGF (odds ratio = 6.18: 95% confidence interval, 1.27-30.18) and wall-lumen ratio >0.5 for inferior renal function at 1 year (odds ratio = 4.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-13.76).ConclusionProcurement biopsies can be useful to predict inferior outcomes even in kidneys with low MAPI scores.     

Outcome of Renal Transplantation From Deceased Donors After Cardiac Death: A Single-Center Experience From a Developing Country

Background

Limited information is available in the literature about the use of organs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) renal transplantation (RTx) from a developing country.

Material and Methods

We report RTx outcome between DCD donors ≥70 years (Group 1; n = 14; mean age, 75.7 ± 5.81) and DCD donors <70 years (Group 2; n = l9; mean age, 51.7 ± 10.1) between January 1999 and January 2012. The mean age of recipients was 39.5 ± 14.7 years, 24 of whom were males. The mean donor age was 61.9 ± 14.6 years, 21 of whom were males. All recipients received single-dose thymoglobulin induction followed by immunosuppression with a steroid, a calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine. Statistical analysis used chi-square test and unpaired Student t test. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis.

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 3.21 ± 3.46 years, one-, five-, and ten-year, patient survival rates were 77%, 67.4%, and 67.4%, respectively, and death-censored graft survival rates were 85.7% for one, five, and ten years. Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 36.4% (n = 12) with 12.1% (n = 4) biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Patient survival (P = .27), graft survival (P = .20), DGF (P = .51), and BPAR (P = .74) were similar in 2 groups. A total of 27.2% (n = 9) of patients died, mainly due to infections (n = 5).

Conclusion

Given the widespread organ shortage, outcomes of controlled DCD renal transplantation has a potential to expand the donor pool and shorten the waiting list for RTx, encouraging the use of this approach even in low-income countries.     

Body Mass Index and Kidney Donor Profile Index as Prognostic Markers of the Outcome of Renal Transplantation

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the effects of Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and body mass index (BMI) of the deceased donor on the kidney allograft outcome 1 year after transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 98 deceased kidney allograft donors with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years. The donors were divided into 5 groups according to their BMI: Normal ΒΜΙ = 25 (n = 25); ΒΜΙ 25 to 29 = Overweight (n = 33); ΒΜΙ 30 to 34.9 = Obese class I (n = 19); ΒΜΙ 35 to 39 = Obese class ΙΙ (n = 11); and ΒΜΙ >40 = Obese class III (n = 10). We examined the impact of the deceased donor's BMI and KDPI on delayed graft function (DGF) and estimated renal glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (measured by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) 1 year after transplantation.ResultsDonor BMI significantly increased the prevalence of DGF (P = .031), and it was associated with higher cold ischemia time (P = .021). However, there was no significant association between the aforementioned BMI groups and 1-year eGFR (P = 0.57), as deceased grafts from donors with increased BMI (BMI > 40) gained sufficient renal function during the first year of transplantation. Moreover, high KDPI was associated not only with DGF (P = .015), but also with decreased values of eGFR (P = .033).ConclusionIn this population, we identified no significant association between donor BMI and long-term clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplants. KDPI, and not ΒΜΙ, of the deceased donor seems to be a good prognostic factor of renal function at the end of the first year after kidney transplant, whereas high BMI and high KDPI markedly induce DGF.     

Rate,Factors, and Outcome of Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation of Deceased Donors

BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation affecting long-term outcome.Patients and methodsA total of 525 consecutive recipients (age 54.2 ± 13.4 years, 33% female) of kidneys from deceased donors transplanted between 2005 and 2012 were retrospectively examined. DGF was defined as the need of dialysis within the first week after transplantation.ResultsDGF developed in 21.1% (n = 111). Factors associated with DGF (P ≤ .035, respectively) were recipient body mass index, C-reactive protein of the recipient, residual diuresis, cold ischemia time, donor age, and diuresis in the first hour after transplantation. Median duration of DGF was 16 (2-66) days. Patients after DGF had a significantly lower GFR compared with recipients without DGF either after 3 (32.9 ± 16.5 vs 46.3 ± 18.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) or after 12 months (38.9 ± 19.3 vs 48.6 ± 20.4 mL/min/1.73 m², P < .001, resp.). During DGF, 12.4% developed BANFF II and 18.0% BANFF I rejection, 20.2% had signs of transplant glomerulitis (first biopsy), and 16.2% (n = 18) remained on dialysis.ConclusionDGF affects 1 out of 5 kidney transplants from deceased donors. Minimizing modifiable risk factors, in particular immunologic risk, may ameliorate the incidence and outcome of DGF. The outcome of DGF depends mainly on the diagnosis of any rejection and worsens upon detection of transplant glomerulitis and pronounced interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA).     

Delayed Graft Function Duration in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants

BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is an important prognostic indicator after kidney transplantation. Depending on the severity of the ischemia-reperfusion injury, DGF can have several clinical presentations, with different renal function recovery times. Both the presence and duration of DGF can have an impact on kidney transplantation outcomes. However, the definition of the cutoff point, above which the outcomes are worse, varies widely in the literature.MethodsTo investigate the impact of DGF and its duration on patient and graft survivals, a single-center retrospective study including all deceased donor kidney transplants was performed between November 2008 and December 2015 (n = 188). Through the analysis on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cutoff point that determined the worst outcome was reached. DGF patients were then divided according to the duration of DGF (<8 days or ≥8 days).ResultsThe overall incidence of DGF was 62.2%. Higher HLA mismatches was an independent risk factor for prolonged DGF. DGF ≥8 days was associated with acute rejection and this one was associated with patient death in 3 years.ConclusionDGF with a duration of more than 8 days associated with higher HLA mismatches increases the risk of acute rejection, but graft loss and patient survival are not affected by DGF, regardless of its duration.     

Factors That Influence Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplants: A Single-Center Paired Kidney Analysis

BackgroundThe risk factors associated with delayed graft function (DGF) and its impact in kidney transplant (KTx) outcomes remains controversial; it is possible that donor renal characteristics influence the initial graft function in KTx.ObjectiveEvaluate risk factors associated with DGF and its impact in KTx outcomes.MethodsOne hundred six mate KTx mate recipients performed in a single center were grouped according to the presence or absence of DGF.ResultsDonors were predominantly men (58%); 70% were standard criteria type, with a mean Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 62% ± 28%, median age of 42 ± 15 and presenting hospitalization time of 6 ± 5 days. KTx recipients presented an overall DGF rate of 82%, lasting 12 ± 7 days. Pairs presenting DGF were older than pairs without DGF (P = .008), while cold ischemia time (CIT) was significantly shorter in the group without DGF compared to those presenting DGF (P = .003). The KDPI of the KTx pairs was significantly higher in pairs with DGF versus without DGF (P = .04). No statistically significant differences in 1 year allograft and patient survival were observed. Recipient age (odds ratio = 6.3, confidence interval = 1.5–25.8; P = .009) and CIT (odds ratio = 4.6, confidence interval = 1.2–17.7; P = .002) were significantly associated with DGF.ConclusionThis study suggests that recipient age, cold ischemic time, and KDPI are factors associated with DGF. In addition, DGF had no impact on 1-year renal function, allograft, and patient survival. In the transplant conditions of our country, Brazil, CIT seems to represent an important variable to be managed, and the aim should be to reduce this factor as much as possible.     

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improves renal transplant candidacy and posttransplant outcomes in morbidly obese patients

Morbid obesity is a barrier to kidney transplantation due to inferior outcomes, including higher rates of new‐onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), delayed graft function (DGF), and graft failure. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) increases transplant eligibility by reducing BMI in kidney transplant candidates, but the effect of surgical weight loss on posttransplantation outcomes is unknown. Reviewing single‐center medical records, we identified all patients who underwent LSG before kidney transplantation from 2011‐2016 (n = 20). Post‐LSG kidney recipients were compared with similar‐BMI recipients who did not undergo LSG, using 2:1 direct matching for patient factors. McNemar's test and signed‐rank test were used to compare groups. Among post‐LSG patients, mean BMI ± standard deviation (SD) was 41.5 ± 4.4 kg/m² at initial encounter, which decreased to 32.3 ± 2.9 kg/m² prior to transplantation (P < .01). No complications, readmissions, or mortality occurred following LSG. After transplantation, one patient (5%) experienced DGF, and no patients experienced NODAT. Allograft and patient survival at 1‐year posttransplantation was 100%. Compared with non‐LSG patients, post‐LSG recipients had lower rates of DGF (5% vs 20%) and renal dysfunction–related readmissions (10% vs 27.5%) (P < .05 each). Perioperative complications, allograft survival, and patient survival were similar between groups. These data suggest that morbidly obese patients with end‐stage renal disease who undergo LSG to improve transplant candidacy, achieve excellent posttransplantation outcomes.     

Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post‐transplant outcomes

Singh RP, Farney AC, Rogers J, Zuckerman J, Reeves‐Daniel A, Hartmann E, Iskandar S, Adams P, Stratta RJ. Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post‐transplant outcomes.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 255–264. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Introduction: Delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in recipients of kidney transplants from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors compared to donation after brain death (DBD) donors. Methods: Single‐center retrospective study to evaluate the impact of DGF on controlled (Maastricht category III) DCD donor kidney transplant outcomes. Results: From 10/01 to 6/08, 578 adult deceased donor kidney transplants were performed including 70 (12%) from DCD and 508 (88%) from DBD donors. Mean follow‐up was 36 months. DCD donor kidney transplants had significantly greater rates of DGF (57% DCD vs. 21% DBD, p < 0.0001)) and acute rejection (29% DCD vs. 16% DBD, p = 0.018) compared to DBD donor kidney transplants, but patient and graft survival rates were similar. DBD donor kidney transplants with DGF (n = 109) had significantly greater rates of death‐censored graft loss (12.5% DCD vs. 31% DBD), primary non‐function (0 DCD vs. 10% DBD) and higher 2 year mean serum creatinine levels (1.4 DCD vs. 2.7 mg/dL DBD) compared to DCD donor kidney transplants with DGF (n = 40, all p < 0.04). On univariate analysis, the presence of acute rejection and older donor age were the only significant risk factors for death‐censored graft loss in DCD donor kidney transplants, whereas DGF was not a risk factor. Conclusion: Despite higher rates of DGF and acute rejection in DCD donor kidney transplants, subsequent outcomes in DCD donor kidney transplants with DGF are better than in DBD donor kidney transplants experiencing DGF, and similar to outcomes in DCD donor kidney transplants without DGF.     

Anti–Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Antibodies Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Patients Without Preformed HLA-Donor–Specific Antibody

IntroductionAngiotensin II is a peptide hormone involved in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Anti–angiotensin receptor 1 (AT1R) antibodies are implicated in stimulating RAS and are suspected to have some adverse impacts on renal transplantation outcome.MethodsFrom November 2009 to February 2012, 37 remaining sera from renal transplantation recipients with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (n = 6), acute cellular rejection (ACR) (n = 23), and AMR + ACR (n = 8) without preformed human leukocyte antigeon (HLA) antibodies were tested with anti-AT1R antibody assay. Forty-two control patients without rejection also were analyzed.ResultsThe frequency of elevated anti-AT1R antibodies was higher in patients with AMR (n = 14) compared to controls (28.6% vs 4.9%, P = .03, OR = 8.0). It was also higher in patients with AMR + ACR (n=8) (37.5% vs 4.9%, P = .03, OR = 12.0). There was no difference in frequencies of elevated anti-AT1R antibody in patients with ACR.ConclusionAnti-AT1R antibodies were suspected to be associated with occurrence of AMR without preformed HLA antibodies in renal transplantation. Further studies in a larger number of patients are needed.