Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen affect sarcopenia status in patients with breast cancer?

BackgroundLow muscle mass, or sarcopenia, predicts poorer treatment outcomes in breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the main treatment to improve surgical outcomes for breast cancer, yet few studies have assessed the relationships between different chemotherapy regimens and sarcopenia. This study compared body composition change between two neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens: AC-T (anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane) and TCHP (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab).MethodsThis study included 298 patients with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2017 and 2020 at one university hospital. Body composition was assessed by computed tomography. Multiple linear regression was performed to examine predictors of SMI change.ResultsPatients receiving TCHP showed a significant mean skeletal muscle index (SMI) decrease of 1.6 cm²/m² (SD = 3.5, p < .001); patients receiving AC-T showed no significant change in mean SMI. The TCHP group also showed significantly decreased visceral and subcutaneous fat mass, while the AC-T group showed increases in both. The TCHP group had significantly more patients with newly diagnosed sarcopenia after neoadjuvant chemotherapy than the AC-T group (12% vs 1%, respectively). Chemotherapy regimen was the only significant predictor of muscle mass loss, and the TCHP group's mean SMI decrease was 3.124 greater than that of the AC-T group (p = .015).ConclusionsPatients receiving TCHP have a higher risk of muscle mass loss than those receiving AC-T. Considering the severe SMI decline observed in the TCHP group, further prospective studies are called for to examine treatment-induced sarcopenia and its relationship to body composition.     

Is there a role for antiandrogen monotherapy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer?

Castration is the most widely used form of androgen ablation employed in the treatment of metastatic (M1) prostate cancer. Non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy is a potential alternative treatment option for men for whom castration is unacceptable or not indicated. Of the three non-steroidal antiandrogens, bicalutamide ('Casodex'), flutamide and nilutamide, only bicalutamide has been compared with castration in large, controlled, randomised, Phase III trials in M1 patients. A post-hoc analysis of these studies indicated that bicalutamide 150 mg/day monotherapy may be of benefit to M1 patients with a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level 400 ng/ml) may decide that quality of life and symptomatic benefits outweigh the slight survival disadvantage seen in clinical trials and opt for bicalutamide monotherapy as an alternative to castration.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2001) 4, 196-203.     

Does the use of pretreatment MRI change the management of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer?

Breast MRI plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative breast MRI on the management of a large cohort of breast cancer patients at our institution. This study is a retrospective chart review of all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI at our institution between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2009. 1352 patients comprised the study population. 241 (17.8%) patients underwent a change in surgical management as a result of preoperative MRI. Patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant and the central breast and those with pathology of invasive lobular carcinoma were significantly more likely to have their management changed by preoperative MRI. There was also a significant trend for larger tumors to be associated with a change in surgical management. No statistically significant association was found between breast density and change in management. This study supports the recommendation for the use of preoperative breast MRI in the majority of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, especially those with larger tumors, pathology of invasive lobular carcinoma, and tumors in the lower inner quadrant. Preoperative breast MRI is a useful tool for the evaluation of additional disease that led to a change in the surgical management of 17.8% of patients.     

Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: Oncotype DX is a 21-gene assay that calculates a risk of distant recurrence in women with estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the results of Oncotype DX influence the decision to administer chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 85 consecutive patients with estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer who had an Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) obtained. Tumor size, tumor grade, and treatment were then compared within each risk category. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA software. RESULTS: Tumors that were high grade and Her-2/neu positive more frequently had a high RS. Treatment was changed as a result of Oncotype DX in 44% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oncotype DX RS is significantly related to tumor grade and Her2/neu status. In this study, the treatment of 44% of patients was altered as a consequence of Oncotype DX RS.     

Is central sarcopenia a predictor of prognosis for patients with pathological fracture?

IntroductionWe aimed to investigate the relationship between central sarcopenia and survival in patients with pathological fracture.MethodsWe reviewed records of patients who were treated for pathological fracture of axial and appendicular skeleton in our clinic between 2011 and 2020. We used the psoas: lumbar vertebral index (PLVI) on axial computer tomographic evaluation to assess for central sarcopenia. A multivariate Cox algorithm was applied to recognize these factors independently associated with one month, six months, one year, and overall survival.ResultsA total of 147 patients [61 (41.4%) male and 86 (58.6%) female] were included, with an average age of 62.4 years. During the study, 108 (73.4%) patients died, and 39 (26.6%) were alive. The survival rates at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery were 94.6%, 68.7%, and 53.1%, respectively. PLVI values ranged from 0.21 to 1.20 with a mean of 0.536 and a median of 0.520. According to the median value of PLVI, 68 patients with sarcopenia had low PLVI and 79 patients without sarcopenia had high PLVI. For the first month, only the preoperative albumin level was identified as a prognostic factor. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) scores and primary malignancy (rapid grade) were strong predictor of poor survival. The PLVI was independent significant predictor of first month (HR, 0.083 [95% CI, 0.011–0.649], p = 0.018) and overall survival (HR, 0.129 [95% CI, 0.034–0.492], p = 0.003).ConclusionThe PLVI was a strong predictor of first year, and overall survival in patients with pathological fracture.     

Is a proliferation index of cancer cells a reliable prognostic factor after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases?

BACKGROUND: In spite of many reports focusing on prognostic factors after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases, few studies have investigated pathological factors, eg, fibrous pseudocapsulation, growth pattern at the tumor margin, and proliferation activity of cancer cells, other than histological type and surgical margin. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether absence of pseudocapsulation, infiltrative growth pattern of metastases, and higher proliferation of cancer cells shown by Ki-67 immunohistochemical reactivity were associated with poorer survival after hepatectomy among patients with colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: Between 1988 and 1998, 221 patients underwent hepatic resection of colorectal metastases with curative intent in our institution. Pathology analyses were focused on pseudocapsulation of liver metastases, growth pattern at the tumor edge, and Ki-67 labelling index (Ki-67 LI) of cancer cell nuclei. Univariate analyses of survival and of disease-free survival were performed for several clinicopathological factors, and multivariate analyses of survival and disease-free survival were also performed. RESULTS: The univariate survival analyses showed that pseudocapsulation, growth pattern, and Ki-67 LI were significant prognostic factors, besides synchronous versus metachronous occurrence of metastases, carcinoembryonic antigen level before hepatectomy, and number of metastases. A multivariate analysis showed that Ki-67 labeling index was the most reliable prognostic factor of survival. In addition, Ki-67 LI and microscopic growth pattern were multivariately predictive factors of disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: This large single-institution study showed that investigation of cancer cell proliferation and pathologic characteristics of the tumor margin are major prognostic factors.     

Is tumour angiogenesis a prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer and no involved nodes?

OBJECTIVE: To examine a possible association between tumour angiogenesis and conventional prognostic variables and to assess the prognostic value of the variables examined in patients with colorectal cancer, with no involved nodes. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Italy. SUBJECTS: 119 patients who had had colorectal cancers resected for cure with no involved nodes between 1985-1990. INTERVENTIONS: The three microscopic fields with the most microvessels were identified by immunohistochemical techniques. 10 high-power fields in each area were used for the microvessel count and the mean values indicated the microvessel density. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of microvessel density with conventional prognostic factors, recurrence rates, and survival. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between microvessel density and sex, women having a higher density than men (p < 0.05), but no significant correlations between density and recurrence rates or survival. Multivariate analysis did not indicate that microvessel density had a prognostic role. CONCLUSION: Microvessel density in colorectal cancer without involved nodes does not correlate with conventional prognostic factors and provides no prognostic information.     

Is axillary lymph node dissection always necessary in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node?

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is recommended for patients with breast cancer metastasis to a sentinel lymph node (SLN). However in 40-70% of cases, the SLN may be the only area of metastasis in the dissected axillary contents. In patients with a positive SLN, independently predictive factors for non-SLN metastasis include size of the primary tumor, the size of the SLN metastases, extracapsular extension, and the proportion of positive SLN's among all identified SLNs. Some authors have developed scores and nomograms to estimate a patient's risk for non-SLN metastases. These scores and nomograms should be applied prospectively to a large numper of SLN positive patients who thereafter undergo completion ALND. It is necessary to verify the predictive validity of these scores before we recommend the abandonment of ALND in patients with a very low likelihood of non-SLN metastasis. In this article we review the various predictive factors of non-SLN involvement and the scores or nomograms which have been developed to predict the likelihood of a positive ALND after a positive SLN biopsy.     

Is there a role for surgery in the management of metastatic urothelial cancer? The M. D. Anderson experience

Purpose

Although rarely curative, chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer. The role of surgery for metastatic disease is not well established for urothelial cancer, but is sometimes undertaken in the face of persistent or recurrent disease that can be surgically resected.

Materials and Methods

We identified 31 patients with metastatic urothelial cancer undergoing metastasectomy with the intent of rendering them free of disease. All gross disease was completely resected in 30 patients (97%). The most frequently resected location was lung in 24 cases (77%), followed by distant lymph nodes in 4 (13%), brain in 2 (7%) and a subcutaneous metastasis in 1 (3%).

Results

Median survival from diagnosis of metastases and from time of metastasectomy was 31 and 23 months, respectively. The 5-year survival from metastasectomy was 33%. Median time to progression following metastasectomy was 7 months. Five patients were alive and free of disease for more than 3 years after metastasectomy.

Conclusions

The results in this highly selected cohort, with 33% alive at 5 years after metastasectomy, suggest that resection of metastatic disease is feasible and may contribute to long-term disease control especially when integrated with chemotherapy. Further prospective studies should be undertaken to better characterize the selection criteria and benefit from this intervention.     

Is carcino-embryonic antigen useful in the follow-up management of patients with colorectal liver metastases?

BACKGROUND: The role of carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in monitoring early detection of recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, and its impact on resectability rate and patient survival remains controversial. Our objective was to determine any association between the preoperative level of CEA and prognosis, and the resectability and survival by method of diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent exploration for hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer over a 15-year period. The patient population consisted of those patients who had undergone primary colon or rectal resection and were followed up with serial CEA levels and of patients who were followed up with physical examination, liver function tests (LFTs) or computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis that led to the diagnosis of liver metastases. Also included in the study were patients who were diagnosed with liver metastases at the time of the primary colon or rectal resection and underwent planned hepatic resection at a later time. RESULTS: Three hundred and one (301) patients who underwent a total of 345 planned hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1978 and December 1993 were included in this analysis. The median preoperative CEA level was 24.8 ng/mL in the resected group, 53.0 ng/mL in the incomplete resection group, and 49.1 ng/mL in the nonresected group (P = 0.02). More of the patients who had a preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL were in the resected group, while those who had a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL were likely to be in the nonresected group (P = 0.002). The median survival was 25 months for patients with a preoperative CEA level < or =30 ng/mL and 17 months for patients with a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL (P = 0.0005). The resectability rate and the survival of patients by method of diagnosing liver metastases-rising CEA versus history and physical, elevated LFTs, CT scan versus diagnosis at the time of primary resection-was not significant (P = 0.06 and P = 0.19, respectively). Given the nonstandardized retrospective nature of the study cohort and relative small groups of patients, the power to detect small differences in survival by method of diagnosis is limited. In the complete resection group of patients with unilobar liver disease (5-year survival of 28.8%) there was no difference in survival between those patients who had normal preoperative CEA and those who had elevated preoperative CEA, and approximately 90% of them had an abnormal preoperative serum CEA level. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is useful in the preoperative evaluation of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases for assessing prognosis and is complimentary to history and physical examination in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Patients with colorectal liver metastases and preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL are more likely to be resectable, and they have the longest survival.     

Is [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by the primary tumor a prognostic factor in breast cancer?

BackgroundWe retrospectively investigated ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by the primary breast tumor as a predictor for relapse and survival.Patients and methodsWe studied 203 patients with cT1-T3N0 breast cancer. Standardized uptake value (SUVmax), was measured on the primary tumor. After a median follow-up of 68 months (range 22–80), the relation between SUVmax and tumor factors, disease free-survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated.ResultsIn the PET-positive patients, the median FDG uptake by the tumor was 4.7. FDG uptake was significantly related to tumor size, number of involved axillary nodes, grade, negative ER, high Ki-67 and HER2 overexpression. No distant metastases or deaths occurred in the PET-negative group. Five-year DFS was 97% and 83%, respectively in the PET-negative and PET-positive groups (P = 0.096). At univariate analysis, DFS was significantly lower in patients with SUVmax >4.7 compared to the patients with negative PET (P = 0.042), but not to the patients with SUVmax ≤4.7 (P = 0.106). At multivariable analysis, among PET-positive patients, SUVmax was not an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR_{>4.7 vs ≤4.7}: 1.02 (95% CI 0.45–2.31)). Five-year OS was 100% and 93%, respectively, in the PET-negative and PET-positive groups (P = 0.126).ConclusionFDG uptake by the primary lesion was significantly associated with several prognostic variables, but it was not an independent prognostic factor.