The pre-operative neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio predicts overall and disease-free survival following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with pseudomxyoma peritonei of appendiceal origin

Aim: The neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and other inflammation-based scores have been used as a prognostic tool to predict survival in solid tumours including pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). The aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of this marker and risk stratify PMP patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted of a prospectively collected database of patients with PMP who underwent CRS and HIPEC between 1994 and 2015. The NLR was calculated by dividing the pre-operative neutrophil count by lymphocyte count. Predicted overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFI) were calculated using a Kaplan–Meier survival model.

Results: The study included 699 patients, stratified into four groups as defined by their NLR. Group A: 200 (28.6%) patients (NLR?=?0.10–2.00), Group B: 160 (22.8%) patients (NLR?=?2.10–2.78), Group C: 184 (26.3%) patients (NLR?=?2.79–4.31) and Group D: 155 (22.2%) patients (NLR?≥?4.32). The median follow-up for this cohort was 36?months. The predicted DFI was 132.2, 113.1, 84.4 and 47.9?months and the OS was 141.1, 117.6, 88.7 and 51.2?months for Groups A, B, C and D, respectively. As the NLR increases, there is a reduction in long-term survival.

Conclusion: The pre-operative NLR is cost effective and has equivalent prognostic value to pre-operative tumour markers for patients with PMP treated with CRS and HIPEC. The NLR is a reliable tool that may have a role in predicting outcomes following CRS and HIPEC for patients with PMP of appendiceal origin.     

Preoperative NLR and PLR in the middle or lower ESCC patients with radical operation

Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) had been analysed in many kind of tumours, but its role of predict the oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients’ prognosis was not reach a consensus. Relationship between NLR, PLR and ESCC located in the middle or lower segment was evaluated. 317 patients with ESCC who underwent attempted curative oesophagectomy were analysed in this study. 157 and 98 patients had elevated NLR and PLR respectively (NLR >3.3 and PLR >150). The median overall survival time (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) was 34.1 and 19.2 months respectively. Multivariate analysis found PLR >150 (P = 0.018, HR 1.426, 95%CI 1.063–1.912) accompanied by male, lymphatic metastases, tumour size more than 3 cm, tumour located at middle segment and poor differentiation were associated with significantly worse DFS. Meanwhile, gender, lymphatic metastases, tumour location and differentiation along with PLR >150 (P = 0.003, HR 1.595, 95% CI 1.172–2.170) and NLR>3.3 (P = 0.039, HR 1.367, 95% CI 1.015–1.840) were all independent prognostic factors for OS. Preoperative NLR and PLR might be used as predictive factors in patients with ESCC. For DFS, elevated PLR compared to NLR may have an advantage to indicate poor prognosis.     

Preoperative platelet–lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic marker and superior to carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of preoperative inflammatory-based indices, platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Methods

Sixty patients with pathologically confirmed CPC treated with CRS and HIPEC between 2003 and 2015 were included. Levels of preoperative PLR, NLR, and CEA were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with OS.

Results

Median OS was 36 months (95% CI, 26.6–45.4) and 5-year OS was 40.5% (95% CI, 27.3–51.6%). Preoperative PLR (p = 0.034) and CEA (p = 0.036) were found to be significant prognostic markers of OS, whereas NLR did not affect OS. PLR remained significant on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.035; 95% CI, 1.027–1.043; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our study indicates that preoperative PLR may be used as a prognostic marker in CPC patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC and could be useful in the preoperative setting when selecting patients for surgery. The subset of patients with PLR > 300 have a median OS of 5 months (95% CI, 0–24.6 months), indicating that CRS and HIPEC may not be superior to systemic chemotherapy in this subset of patients.

     

A novel treatment protocol with 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in stage III primary ovarian cancer

BackgroundFew prospective studies investigated neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in advanced ovarian cancer. We report the results of a phase II study where 6 rather than 3 cycles of NAC, followed by CRS and HIPEC, were adopted (HIPEC_ovaio, EudraCT number 2007-005674-31).Materials and methodsBetween 2007 and 2014, 56 patients with stage III primary ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis were assigned to 6 cycles of platinum and taxane-based NAC. Of these, two had progression, 8 underwent palliative surgery, and 46 had CRS and HIPEC.ResultsA complete pathological response was observed in 9 patients. Of 46 patients who completed the treatment protocol, 29 had no macroscopic residual tumor. Postoperative grade III morbidity rate was 28.2%; no grade IV complications or mortality events were observed. Five-year overall survival (OS) of the entire series was 36 ± 7% (median: 36, 95% CI: 26–45 months). In 46 patients treated by CRS and HIPEC, 5-year OS was 42 ± 8% (median: 53, 95% CI: 29–76 months), and 5-year progression-free survival was 26 ± 7% (median: 23, 95% CI: 19–27 months). Completeness of cytoreduction, peritoneal cancer index and FIGO stage resulted as significant prognostic factors.ConclusionsA novel protocol consisting of 6 cycles of NAC, followed by CRS and HIPEC, is associated with notable improvement in peritoneal carcinomatosis, limited postoperative morbidity risk and high survival rates in responders, and could deserve further investigations in randomized clinical trials.     

Outcomes following synchronous liver resection,cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases: A bi-institutional study

PurposeSynchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal liver (CRLM) and peritoneal metastases (CRPM) has traditionally been contraindicated. However, latest practice promotes specialist, multidisciplinary-led consideration for select patients. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of synchronous resection in the management of CRLM and CRPM from two tertiary referral centres.MethodThis bi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study included patients undergoing simultaneous liver resection, CRS and HIPEC for metastatic colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020. Patients treated with ablative liver techniques, staged operative approaches and extra abdominal disease were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with survival and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV).ResultsTwenty-three patients were included. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 9 (range 0–22). There were two major liver resections and 21 minor resections. CC-0 resections were achieved in all patients. Major morbidity occurred in 7 patients. There were no deaths at 90 days. PCI was independently associated with morbidity (p = 0.04). PCI >10 (p = 0.069), major morbidity (p = 0.083) and presence of KRAS mutation (p = 0.052) approached significance for poor OS. Median follow up was 21 months (4–54 months). Median OS was 37 months, 3-year survival 54%, and median DFS 18 months.ConclusionSynchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in selected patients with low-volume CRPM and CRLM. Increasing PCI is associated with postoperative major morbidity, and should be considered during operative planning.     

201 consecutive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures in a single Asian tertiary centre

Introduction: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is increasingly being treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). We provide a review of a high-volume Asian institute's experience and survival outcomes with this procedure.

Methods: Data were prospectively collected from 201 consecutive CRS and HIPEC procedures performed in a single institution between April 2001 and November 2015. Our primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality.

Results: 77% of patients were Chinese, 9% were Malay, 6% were Indian and 8% were other ethnicities. Primary tumours were colorectal (30%), ovarian (32%), appendiceal (20%), primary peritoneal (6.5%), mesothelioma (4.5%) and others (5%). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 12, and 92% of patients achieved a completeness of cytoreduction score (CC) of 0. High-grade morbidity occurred in 25.8% of cases, and there were no 30-day mortalities. At 5-years, the OS was 55.1% and DFS was 20.3%. Factors associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis were PCI <15 (p?p?=?0.016).

Conclusions: The combined treatment of CRS and HIPEC is beneficial and is associated with reasonable morbidity and mortality in Asian patients with PC from colorectal, ovarian, appendiceal, primary peritoneal and mesothelioma primaries. Complete cytoreduction and extent of disease are the most important prognostic factors for survival.     

Closed hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with CO2 recirculation system compared with the open Coliseum technique in peritoneal malignity treatment

BackgroundCytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis can be performed in two ways: first, the standard open abdominal technique (Open HIPEC); or second, the closed technique. In recent years, a new technique has been introduced to perform closed HIPEC; the Peritoneal Recirculation System (PRS-1.0 Combat) with CO₂ recirculation technology (PRS Closed HIPEC). The objective of this study is to present our experience with the PRS Closed HIPEC by comparing the intraoperative, postoperative and oncological results with the standard Open HIPEC technique (the Coliseum technique).MethodsData on patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC at the Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid from October 2012 to June 2021 were collected in a prospective database. The inclusion criteria were patients with primary or recurrent peritoneal metastases in gastrointestinal malignancies or ovarian cancer. The presence of an unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis, the coexistence of another oncological disease, unresectable and distant metastases were the exclusion criteria.ResultsFrom October 2014 to June 2021, 84 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC at the Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid with curative intent. Since the introduction of the PRS Closed HIPEC technique in 2016, 65 patients have been treated. Before the introduction of PRS Closed HIPEC, 19 cases were performed using the Coliseum technique (the Open HIPEC group). The intraoperative results were similar in the two groups. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all cases in the Open HIPEC group and in 98% in the PRS Closed HIPEC group. The rate of major complications was similar between the groups. Median Overall Survival (OS) resulted better in the Closed HIPEC group (67 months) with respecto to the Open group (43 months) (p < 0,001). Median Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was 15 months in the Open HIPEC group and 40 months in the PRS Closed HIPEC group (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe Peritoneal Recirculation System with CO₂ recirculation technology (PRS Closed HIPEC) is a reproducible and safe technique and may represent a valid alternative for the administration of HIPEC.     

The absence of benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in initially resectable peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer origin treated with complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) of colorectal origin treated with complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with or without perioperative systemic chemotherapy (PCT+/PCT-).Patients and methodsRetrospective analysis of 125 patients treated with complete CRS (R0/R1) and HIPEC for PM from colorectal origin in two Belgian academic centers between 2008 and 2017. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed with regard to PCT. Statistical analyses were adjusted for non-balanced survival risk factors.ResultsThe PCT+ group (n = 67) received at least 5 cycles of PCT and the PCT-group (n = 56) did not receive PCT. The groups were well balanced for all prognostic factors except presentation of synchronous disease (more in PCT+). Survival analysis was adjusted to peritoneal cancer index and presentation of synchronous disease. After a median follow-up of 54±5-months, the 1, 3, 5-years OS in the PCT+ group were 98%, 59% and 35% compared to 97%, 77% and 56% in the PCT-group (HR = 1.46; 95% CI:0.87–2.47; p = 0.155). The 1,3 and 5 years DFS in the PCT+ group were 47%, 13% and 6% compared to 58%, 29% and 26% respectively in the PCT- (HR = 1.22; 95% CI:0.78–1.92; p = 0.376).ConclusionThis study does not show any clear benefit of PCT in carefully selected patients undergoing R0/R1 CRS and HIPEC for colorectal PM. The ongoing CAIRO6 trial randomizing CRS/HIPEC versus CRS/HIPEC and PCT will probably clarify the role of PCT in patients with resectable PM.     

Prognostic and predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after curative rectal cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in numerous solid malignancies. Here, we quantify the prognostic value of NLR in rectal cancer patients undergoing curative-intent surgery, and compare it with platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR).MethodsA comprehensive search of several electronic databases was performed through January 2021, to identify studies evaluating the prognostic impact of pretreatment NLR in patients undergoing curative rectal cancer resection. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and clinicopathologic parameters. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.ResultsThirty-one studies comprising 7553 patients were assessed. All studies evaluated NLR; thirteen and six evaluated PLR and LMR, respectively. High NLR was associated with worse OS (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.60–2.30, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.51–2.22, P < 0.001), and the results were consistent in all subgroup analyses by treatment modality, tumor stage, study location, and NLR cut-off value, except for the subgroups limited to cohorts with cut-off value ≥ 4. The size of effect of NLR on OS and DFS was greater than that of PLR, and similar to that of LMR. Finally, high NLR was associated with lower rate of pathologic complete response.ConclusionsIn the setting of curative rectal cancer resection, pretreatment NLR correlates with tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, and along with LMR, is a robust predictor of poorer prognosis. These biomarkers may thus help risk-stratify patients for individualized treatments and enhanced surveillance.     

Combined detection of preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and interleukin-6 as an independent prognostic factor for patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundThis study sought to explore the value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in predicting the prognosis of patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsThe data of 88 surgical CRC patients were retrospectively analyzed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the patients’ thresholds for the NLR and IL-6. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression models were used to assess the prognostic values.ResultsA ROC analysis was conducted to calculate the NLR cut-off value. The area under the curve (AUC) of the NLR was 0.739 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.634 to 0.844] for overall survival (OS), and 0.799 (95% CI: 0.705 to 0.892) for disease-free survival (DFS). The AUC of IL-6 was 0.773 (95% CI: 0.670 to 0.876) for OS, and 0.817 (95% CI: 0.728 to 0.906) for DFS. The AUC of NLR + IL-6 was 0.805 (95% CI: 0.710 to 0.899) for OS and 0.853 (95% CI: 0.774 to 0.933) for DFS, which were higher than the NLR or IL-6 alone AUCs for OS and DFS. In addition, a high NLR and IL-6 value was significantly correlated with tumor differentiation and tumor-node-metastasis staging. The NLR was positively correlated with IL-6 level (r=0.481). The results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that a high NLR + IL-6 value was correlated with worse OS and DFS.ConclusionsA high NLR and IL-6 value is a better independent prognostic biomarker of CRC than the NLR or IL-6 level alone, and may be applied in clinical practice to identify high-risk patients.     

血小板与淋巴细胞比值预测三阴性乳腺癌临床预后及与免疫球蛋白表达的关系

目的:探讨血小板与淋巴细胞比值（platelet to lymphocyte ratio,PLR）对三阴性乳腺癌的临床预后影响及与免疫球蛋白表达的关系。方法:回顾性分析2006年1月至2012年12月于我院乳腺外科住院治疗的134例三阴性乳腺癌患者。临床独立预后因素采用单因素和多因素Cox回归模型分析。术后生存时间和生存曲线比较采用Kaplan-Meier和log-rank方法。结果:PLR是三阴性乳腺癌的独立预后因素,最佳临界值为155.00。PLR＜155.00组,术后中位DFS为35.51月,中位OS为55.24月;PLR≥155.00组,术后中位DFS为25.07月,中位OS为35.17月。两组术后DFS和OS比较,差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论:PLR是三阴性乳腺癌的独立预后因素,具有重复性强、非侵袭性、方便实用等特性,可用于预测三阴性乳腺癌临床预后。     

Prognostic Significance of Inflammation-associated Blood Cell Markers in Nonmetastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

ObjectivesOur objective was to evaluate the effect of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) on the survival outcomes of nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).Materials and MethodsWe accessed our single-center, urologic-oncologic registry to extract the data for patients who had undergone nephrectomy for nonmetastatic ccRCC. The optimal cutoff for these markers was determined using X-tile software, and survival analyses using Cox regression were performed.ResultsA total of 687 patients had undergone nephrectomy. The optimal cutoffs for NLR, PLR, LMR, and RDW were 3.3, 210, 2.4, and 14.3%, respectively. The NLR, PLR, LMR, and RDW were significantly associated with a larger pathologic tumor size, and stage, more aggressive Fuhrman grade, and the presence of tumor necrosis. After adjusting for age, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, pathologic tumor and nodal stage, and Fuhrman grade, only PLR remained an independent prognostic marker for both cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-5.33; P = .004) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-3.50; P = .001). When the PLR was included with the Leibovich score and University of California, Los Angeles, integrated staging system, the Harrell’s c-index increased from 0.854 to 0.876 and 0.751 to 0.810, respectively, for cancer-specific survival at 5 years after nephrectomy. When risk stratified by the Leibovich risk group and UCLA integrated staging system, PLR was a significant prognostic factor only within the intermediate- to high-risk groups.ConclusionsPLR is a robust prognostic marker in nonmetastatic ccRCC that clearly outperforms other inflammatory indexes in those who had undergone nephrectomy. However, its prognostic effect was limited in the low-risk category of ccRCC.     

Preoperative neutrophil:lymphocyte and platelet:lymphocyte ratios predict endometrial cancer survival

Background:

Variations in systemic inflammatory response biomarker levels have been associated with adverse clinical outcome in various malignancies. This study determined the prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil:lymphocyte (NLR), platelet:lymphocyte (PLR) and monocyte:lymphocyte (MLR) ratios in endometrial cancer.

Methods:

Clinicopathological and 5-year follow-up data were obtained for a retrospective series of surgically treated endometrial cancer patients (n=605). Prognostic significance was determined for overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan–Meier analysis. Receiver–operator characteristic and log-rank functions were used to optimise cut-offs. NLR, PLR and MLR associations with clinicopathological variables were determined using non-parametric tests.

Results:

Applying cut-offs of ⩾2.4 (NLR), ⩾240 (PLR) and ⩾0.19 (MLR), NLR and PLR (but not MLR) had independent prognostic significance. Combining NLR and PLR scores stratified patients into low (NLR-low and PLR-low), intermediate (NLR-high or PLR-high) and high risk (NLR-high and PLR-high) groups: multivariable hazard ratio (HR) 2.51; P<0.001 (OS); HR 2.26; P<0.01 (CSS) for high vs low risk patients. Increased NLR and PLR were most strongly associated with advanced stage (P<0.001), whereas increased MLR was strongly associated with older age (P<0.001).

Conclusion:

Both NLR and PLR are independent prognostic indicators for endometrial cancer, which can be combined to provide additional patient stratification.     

Oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with single drug versus multiple drug treatment for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases: an observational cohort study

BackgroundLong-term survival for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is possible when treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The objective of this study was to compare three different oxaliplatin-based (OX)-HIPEC regimens. Primary end-point was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints, morbidity and overall survival (OS).MethodsThis is a retrospective study of all patients with colorectal PM treated with CRS and HIPEC between 2004 and 2015 from the prospectively maintained Uppsala HIPEC database. One hundred and thirty-three patients were identified. Three HIPEC regimens were included: OX-HIPEC, OX-HIPEC + post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin-irinotecan-based (OXIRI)-HIPEC. Multivariable Cox regression for DFS was performed.ResultsSixty-one patients received OX-HIPEC, 24 patients received OX-HIPEC + 5-FU EPIC, and 48 patients received OXIRI-HIPEC. The DFS for the OX-HIPEC group was 10.5 months, OX-HIPEC + EPIC 11.9 months, and OXIRI-HIPEC 13.4 months (OX-HIPEC vs. OXIRI HIPEC, P=0.049). The morbidity and OS did not differ between the groups. In the multivariable analysis, low peritoneal cancer index (PCI), absence of liver metastases, low completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score, and multiple drug (EPIC or OXIRI) HIPEC regimen were independent prognostic factors for DFS.ConclusionsThis study showed improved DFS with an intensification of HIPEC by adding irinotecan or EPIC compared to oxaliplatin alone without an increase in morbidity or mortality.     

Association between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio,platelet-lymphocyte ratio,and survival in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (NLR,PLR, and overall survival in UPS)

Background and objectivesCancer-related inflammation has been shown to be a driver of tumor growth and progression, and there has been a recent focus on identifying markers of the inflammatory tumor microenvironment. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are inflammatory indices that have been identified as prognostic biomarkers in various malignancies. However, there is limited and conflicting data regarding their prognostic value in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and specifically in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS).MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical treatment for primary UPS from 1993 to 2021. Cutoff values for NLR and PLR were determined by receiver operating curve analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine prognostic factors on univariate and multivariate analysis.ResultsEighty-six patients were included. The optimal cutoff value was 3.3 for NLR and 190 for PLR. Both high NLR (HR 2.44; 95% CI 1.29–4.63; p = 0.005) and high PLR (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.08–3.67, p = 0.02) were associated with worse OS on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, metastasis at presentation and radiotherapy were independently predictive of OS, but high NLR (HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.64–2.98; p = 0.41) and high PLR (HR 1.63; 95% CI 0.82–3.25; p = 0.17) were not predictive of survival.ConclusionsHigh pre-treatment NLR and PLR were associated with decreased overall survival but were not independent predictors of survival in patients undergoing resection for UPS. Until additional prospective studies can be done, survival outcomes are best predicted using previously established patient- and tumor-specific factors.     

Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: The prognostic impact of baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte,platelet-lymphocyte and lymphocyte-monocyte ratios

PurposeIn this retrospective analysis we sought to determine if the preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) were predictive of both operability and survival in those patients presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC).MethodsAnalysis included all patients admitted between 2009 and 2017 with PC from CRC who were treated with curative intent by CRS-Mitomycin C-HIPEC. Patients were assessed pre- and intra-operatively by the PC index (PCI) and by a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score with calculation of Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Discrimination was made for NLR >3.5, PLR >168.8 and LMR >4.4.ResultsWe identified 98 CRC patients undergoing 105 CRS-HIPEC procedures. There were no associations detected between NLR/PLR/LMR and the rates of incomplete or abandoned CRS cases. Overall survival (OS) after CRS-HIPEC was worse with high versus low NLR (19.9 mths vs. 45.7 mths, respectively; P = 0.009) and also with low versus high LMR (27.1 mths vs. 53.2 mths, respectively; P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, a low LMR (P = 0.008), the preoperative CT PCI value (P = 0.004), poor tumor differentiation (P = 0.023) and the preoperative CEA level (P < 0.001) were all independent variables associated with a worse OS after surgery.ConclusionsThe baseline LMR value may have potential value as a selection tool for CRS-HIPEC in patients with CRC-related PC.     

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in extremities undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma

BackgroundNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in peripheral blood reflects the balance between systemic inflammation and immunity and has been reported as a prognostic biomarker in many neoplastic diseases, but its role in sarcomas has been poorly investigated. In this paper we analyzed the prognostic role of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in extremity undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (eUPS).Materials and methodsWe performed an observational, retrospective study including all eUPS cases treated at the National Institute of Cancer in Mexico City from January 2000 to December 2018. We used a ROC analysis to find the cut-off point where the NLR had the best value in predicting death (area under the curve: 0.73, P = 0.001). When the cut-off point was set at 3.09, the sensitivity of the test was 79% and the specificity was 59%. Demographic and clinical variables using log-rank test were also analyzed. Univariate Cox regression analyses and multivariate proportional hazards regression model were carried out to identify independent prognostic factors for Overall survival (OS), Disease-free survival (DFS), Metastasis free survival (MFS) and their association with the NLR.ResultsWe included 112 cases, 53.6% were women. Most cases were stage IIIA (33.9%) or IIIB (30.4%) and Grade 3 (91.1%). High NLR correlated with metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.001), locally advanced stage (p = 0.05), worse OS (HR = 1.33, 95% CI:1.01-1.75 p = 0.041) and higher risk of specific death (HR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.88-12.72 p = 0.001). Non-use of chemotherapy (HR: 1.33, 95% CI:1.01-1.75 p = 0.041) was also associated with worse OS.ConclusionThe NLR is a simple yet useful prognostic factor in patients with eUPS when using a cut-off value of 3.09. Soft tissue sarcomas lack routine biomarkers that are applied widely, therefore we propose to consider and include the NLR in prospective trials or prognostic nomograms.     

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials

PurposeTo assess the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with International Union Against Cancer (UICC)–staged III/IVA,B nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), who were enrolled into two randomised controlled trials of concurrent/adjuvant chemotherapy when added to radiotherapy (SQNP01), and induction chemotherapy when added to chemoradiotherapy (NCC0901).Material and methodsA post hoc analysis of pooled cohorts from SQNP01 (N = 221) and NCC0901 (N = 172) was performed. We employed a threshold of pre-treatment NLR = 3.0 (median) to stratify patients. Survival outcomes were compared using log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess association between NLR and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence–free survival (LRFS).ResultsHigh NLR (≥3.0) was associated with advanced T-status (p = 0.002), N-status (p = 0.002), overall UICC stage (p = 0.004), and high pre-treatment Epstein–Barr virus DNA titre (p = 0.001). High NLR was not associated with OS (0.94 [0.67–1.32], p = 0.7), DFS (0.98 [0.73–1.33], p = 0.9), DMFS (1.02 [0.66–1.57], p = 0.9), and LRFS (1.37 [0.84–2.22], p = 0.2) on univariable and multivariable analyses, while conventional clinical indices (T-status, N-status, and overall UICC stage) were prognostic of clinical outcomes. High NLR also did not predict for a treatment effect with the experimental arms in both trials.ConclusionOur pooled analyses that were confined to a homogenous patient population of locally advanced NPC do not suggest that NLR adds prognostic value to conventional clinical indices in identifying patients with unfavourable disease.     

Survival after cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases in colorectal cancer patients: Does a history of resected liver metastases worsen the prognosis?

BackgroundNowadays, resection of two (liver and peritoneum) concomitant colorectal cancer metastatic sites is no longer contraindicated. However, the oncologic outcomes of resecting peritoneal metastases (PM) occurring more than six months after resection of liver metastases (LM) are unknown.AimThe aim of this study was to compare patients with complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without a history of previous liver resection (LR).MethodsAnalysis from a prospective database of 74 patients with metachronous PM treated with CRS between 2010 and 2020.ResultsAll patients had PM metachronous to primary, 64 patients underwent CRS alone (CRSa) and 10 CRS more than six months after LR (LR-CRS). There was no statistical difference between the groups for clinical or therapeutic characteristics. There were more signet ring cell/mucinous adenocarcinomas in the CRSa group than in the LR-CRS group (19% vs. 0%, p = 0.049). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 4 and 6 (p = 0.749) in the LR-CRS and CRSa groups, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not statistically different between the two groups with 43.6 and 13 months for the CRSa group and 31.1 months and 9.4 months for LR-CRS. Advanced age was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS and high PCI was limit significant. No prognostic factor for DFS was found.ConclusionsLR before CRS has no major prognostic impact. Resection of iterative liver and peritoneum metastases can achieve long-term survival.     

Pattern of recurrence after interval cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary advanced stage IIIC/IVA epithelial ovarian cancer

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of recurrence and factors affecting the same after interval cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in primary stage IIIC and IV A epithelial ovarian cancer.MethodsIn this retrospective multicentric study, all patients with FIGO stages III-C and IV-A epithelial ovarian carcinoma were treated with CRS and HIPEC after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Relevant clinical and demographic data were captured. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the factors affecting recurrence after CRS and HIPEC.ResultsFrom January 2017 to Jan 2020, 97, consecutive patients of Stage IIIC/IVA epithelial ovarian cancer underwent interval cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median duration of follow up duration was 20 months [1–36months]. 21/97 (21.6%) patients presented with disease recurrence. Visceral recurrences involving the lungs, liver and brain were seen in 8/21 (38%) of cases and comprised the commonest sites. On multivariable analysis, nodal involvement (p = 0.05), selective peritonectomy (p = 0.001) and leaving behind residual disease <0.25 mm (CC1) (p = 0.01) was associated with increased risk of disease recurrence. Extent of peritonectomy (OS,p = 0.56, PFS p = 0.047, Log Rank test) and nodal positivity (OS, p = 0.13,PFS,p = 0.057, Log Rank test) were found to impact progression free survival but had no impact on overall survival.ConclusionThere is a higher incidence of systemic recurrences in patients with Stage IIIC/IVA epithelial ovarian carcinoma after CRS and HIPEC. Extent of peritonectomy and nodal clearance impacts patterns of recurrence and progression free survival.