Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with partial seizures: an open-label trial

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) as adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. METHODS: Children (aged 6-12 years) with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures receiving one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) were eligible. After a 4-week baseline period, children received LEV in a 6-week titration phase (target dose, 40 mg/kg/day) followed by an 8-week evaluation phase. Seizure frequency during the evaluation period with individualized LEV doses (20-40 mg/kg/day) were compared with the 4-week baseline seizure frequency. Plasma concentrations of LEV and other AEDs were determined to evaluate potential drug interactions. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects enrolled and received LEV; 23 entered the evaluation phase, and 22 completed the evaluation phase. Compared with their baseline seizure frequency, 12 (52%) of 23 subjects entering the evaluation phase had their seizure frequency decrease by >50%. Two subjects remained seizure free during the entire evaluation period. LEV did not significantly affect plasma concentrations of any concomitant AED during this study, and no alteration of mean clinical laboratory values was observed. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, infection, anorexia, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label study of adjunctive LEV therapy (at 20-40 mg/kg/day) suggests that LEV is effective, safe, and well tolerated in children ages 6-12 years with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of LEV adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures is needed and ongoing to confirm these open-label findings.     

Aggravation of partial seizures by antiepileptic drugs: is there evidence from clinical trials?

OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical trials for evidence that antiepileptic drugs (AED) aggravate partial seizures. To determine if the methodology used to examine drug efficacy can also be used to examine seizure aggravation. BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that AED aggravate epilepsy in some patients. However, there is little published objective or quantitative evidence. Most reports concern generalized epilepsies. METHODS: Pharmaceutical companies responsible for the development of five of the new AED were asked to provide data concerning seizure increases during randomized placebo-controlled, add-on clinical trials in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. Seizure frequency in individual patients taking drug or placebo was compared with the baseline pretreatment seizure frequency. The counterpart of the 50% reduction used in efficacy analyses is a 100% increase, because both represent a twofold change. A dose-response relationship was also explored. RESULTS: More than 40% of subjects in clinical trials of tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), and levetiracetam (LEV) experienced an increase in seizures while taking a placebo. Seizure increases were no more likely to occur when taking any of the three drugs than taking placebo. A doubling or more of seizure frequency was less likely to occur with TPM or LEV than with placebo but more likely with TGB. However, for TGB, this did not reach significance. There was some evidence for a dose-response effect with TGB but a negative effect with TPM (aggravation less likely with increasing dose). Data on gabapentin and lamotrigine were not provided. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with partial seizures experience an increase in seizures when a new AED is added to their therapy. However, it occurs no more frequently when taking drug than placebo. It probably represents the spontaneous fluctuation of seizure frequency. When a patient who has started a new AED deteriorates, this is not necessarily a drug effect.     

Levetiracetam in children with refractory epilepsy: a multicenter open label study in Germany.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Levetiracetam (LEV) in a large pediatric cohort with drug-resistant epilepsy from a prospective multicenter observational study. METHODS: We report the results of a multicenter observational survey of a cohort of 285 pediatric patients (mean: 9.9 years, range: 0; 6-17; 11) with refractory generalized and focal epilepsy who received Levetiracetam as an add-on open label treatment trial. The average duration of epilepsy was 6.0 years and the patients were treated with a mean of 7.0 antiepileptic drugs (AED) before LEV was introduced. RESULTS: No serious persistent adverse events were reported. Reversible colitis and an apnoea syndrome in a child with phosphorylase-A-kinase-deficiency were noted. Mild to moderate side effects were reported in 128 patients (44.9%), consisting most frequently of somnolence (23.9%), general behavioral changes (15.4%), aggression (10.5%) and sleep disturbances (3.2%). In 209 patients, efficacy was analyzed over a treatment period of at least 12 weeks compared to a baseline of 2 weeks. Thirteen patients (6.2%) became seizure free, 39 (18.7%) responded with a seizure reduction of more than 50% following introduction of LEV. No response to LEV was reported in 65.1% (n=136). A decrease of initial treatment effect was seen in 37 patients (17.8%) while in 6.7% the seizure frequency doubled to the baseline (n=14). In seven patients (3.3%), the effect of LEV on seizure frequency could not be evaluated. A positive psychotropic effect was observed in 18 patients (8.6%). Mental retardation was associated with poor response and associated with more side effects and earlier discontinuation of LEV therapy. CONCLUSION: LEV is a well-tolerated new AED that may effectively improve seizure control as an add-on drug in resistant epilepsy in childhood with good tolerability. However, neurologically handicapped children appear at increased risk for reversible neurocognitive side effects and have a poorer treatment response.     

Comparison of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine monotherapy among Korean patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: A long‐term,randomized, open‐label trial

This open‐label, multicenter, randomized phase IV trial (NCT01498822) of noninferiority design compared the long‐term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy with those of oxcarbazepine (OXC) monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Korean patients (16–80 years), with ≥2 unprovoked focal seizures in the year preceding the trial, who had not taken any antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the last 6 months, were randomized to receive LEV or OXC (1:1). Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability were assessed over a 50‐week period. Treatment failure rates (per protocol set) were 15/118 (12.7%) in the LEV‐treated group and 30/128 (23.4%) in the OXC‐treated group, an absolute difference of ?10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] ?20.2, ?1.2). Because the upper 95% CI limit was less than the pre‐specified noninferiority margin of 15%, LEV was considered noninferior to OXC. Twenty‐four‐week and 48‐week seizure freedom rates were 53.8% and 34.7% for LEV vs. 58.5% and 40.9% for OXC. Both LEV and OXC were well tolerated, with 8.7% and 8.6% of patients reporting serious treatment‐emergent adverse events, respectively. By comparing LEV with OXC, another newer AED, LEV can be considered a useful option as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.     

Nonadherence to treatment causing acute hospitalizations in people with epilepsy: An observational,prospective study

The aim was to assess the clinical relevance of antiepileptic drug (AED) nonadherence by means of therapeutic drug concentration monitoring (TDM). Two hundred eighty‐two consecutive patients with epilepsy acutely admitted to hospital for seizures were included. Nonadherence was defined as having a serum concentration/dose ratio at admission of <75% of the patient's own control value (probable nonadherence: 50–75%; definite: <50%). Nonadherence was identified in 39% of patients (definite 24%; probable 15%). It was significantly more common in patients with generalized seizures compared to those with focal onset seizures, and in patients <30 years compared to older patients. When specifically asked, 44% of nonadherent patients claimed regular intake. Nonadherence is a major cause of seizure breakthrough in patients with epilepsy, particularly in young adults. Many patients seem to be unaware of missed drug intake. Prompt measurements of AED serum concentrations should be available as part of the emergency care for patients acutely hospitalized for seizures to permit this issue to be thoroughly addressed prior to discharge.     

Comparison of Status Epilepticus with Prolonged Seizure Episodes Lasting from 10 to 29 Minutes

Summary: Purpose: Status epilepticus (SE) is a major medical and a neurologic emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The current definition of SE is continuous seizure activity or intermittent seizure activity without regaining consciousness, lasting ≥30 min. Epilepsy monitoring unit data indicate that many seizures self-terminate within minutes. Thus consideration was recently given to include seizure episodes lasting ≥10 min in the definition of SE. Because no large studies have been conducted on seizures lasting 10–29 min, this study was initiated to compare cases of SE and 10 to 29-min seizure episodes seen within the same period. Methods: Patients seen at the Medical College of Virginia Hospitals of Virginia Commonwealth University over the same 2-year period were studied. Two hundred twenty-six prospective SE cases (91 children and 135 adults) and 81 retrospective 10- to 29-min seizure episodes (31 children and 50 adults) were compared. A standardized data-entry-form system was compiled on each patient and was used to evaluate the data collected. Results: The 10- to 29-min seizure patients and the SE cases had similar demographic characteristics, such as sex, race, and age, and also had similar etiologies. The majority (93%) of SE cases required anticonvulsant (AED) treatment to control and stop seizure activity. In the 10- to 29-min group, 43% stopped seizing spontaneously, and the remainder (57%) required AED treatment to stop seizure activity. The mortality for the SE patients was 19% compared with 2.6% for 10- to 29-min group (p <0.001). In the 10- to 29-min group that stopped seizing spontaneously, the mortality was 0. In the 10- to 29-min patients that required AED treatment, the mortality was 4.4%. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that a significant number of patients experience seizure activity lasting from 10- to 29-min. Approximately half of these seizure events stopped spontaneously and did not require AED treatment. The other half of the patients responded quickly to medications and stopped seizing before the 30-min definition for SE. The overall mortality of this group was significantly lower than that of the patients with SE. The results demonstrate that further studies on the 10- to 29-min seizure group are needed to differentiate seizures that will stop spontaneously and those that will only stop with AED treatment. Because almost half of the prolonged seizures stopped spontaneously, further studies are needed before including prolonged seizure activity in the definition of SE.     

Levetiracetam in patients with refractory epilepsy: results of the SKATE trial in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

PURPOSE: To further evaluate the safety, efficacy and optimal dose of levetiracetam (LEV) in daily clinical practice among patients with uncontrolled partial epilepsy with or without secondary generalization. METHODS: In this phase IV, open-label, 16-week community-based study, 178 at least 16-year-old patients with refractory focal epilepsy were treated with 1000, 2000 or 3000 mg levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy. All patients started with 500 mg LEV b.i.d. (1000 mg/day); the dose was adjusted in 2-week intervals up to 1500 b.i.d. (3000 mg/day) depending on seizure control and tolerability. The main objectives were the adverse events, the percentage reduction in partial and total seizure frequency per week from baseline and the retention rate, defined as the percentage of patients taking LEV at the end of the 16-week treatment period. RESULTS: Of the 178 patients who took at least one dose of LEV 151 completed the study. Thus, the retention rate (number of patients taking LEV at the end of the 16-week treatment period) was 84.8%. Most frequently reported adverse events were asthenia, dizziness, headache, nausea, somnolence and hostility; the majority of these events were of mild to moderate intensity. The seizure-free rate of the ITT population with focal seizures was 16.7%, for all seizures 16.6%; the median reduction of focal seizure frequency was 47.6%, and 46.5% for all seizures. The 50% responder rate was 46.6% for focal seizures and 45.1% for all seizures. CONCLUSION: Add-on treatment with LEV in patients with refractory partial epilepsy was safe and effective in this study.     

Evidence for sustained efficacy of levetiracetam as add-on epilepsy therapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term clinical usefulness of levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra((R))(1)) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy. METHODS: Data for all 1422 patients with refractory epilepsy treated with LEV during the development program were analyzed for changes in seizure frequency per week, seizure freedom, and adverse events. RESULTS: Median percent reduction from baseline in seizure frequency per week over the whole treatment period was 39.6%, and no decrease over time was observed within each cohort exposed to LEV for durations ranging from 6 to 54 months. The median treatment period was 399 days (range 1-8 years). The proportion of responders during the first 3 months of LEV treatment was 39.2%. This proportion remained stable at 6 months (36.1%). Overall, 38.6 and 20.1% of patients had reductions in seizure frequency of at least 50 and 75%. Sixty-five (4.6%) patients were seizure-free over their entire treatment period, compared with 167 (11.7%) and 126 (8.9%) during their last 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Ninety-seven (19.8%) of 491 patients who received only one other antiepileptic drug (AED) in addition to LEV were seizure-free during their last 6 months. The proportion of patients who reduced their number of concomitant AEDs was 14.4% (205 patients), while 5.5% (79 patients) were treated with LEV only at the end of follow-up. Accidental injury (28.0%), infection (26.6%), headache (25.8%), somnolence (23%), asthenia (22.6%), and dizziness (18.9%) were among the most common adverse events. CONCLUSION: LEV offers sustained efficacy in patients with refractory partial seizures, and its long-term tolerability is similar to that seen in the short-term placebo-controlled trials.     

Practice Variations in the Management of Status Epilepticus

Background

Numerous anticonvulsant agents are now available for treating status epilepticus (SE). However, a paucity of data is available to guide clinicians in the initial treatment of seizures or SE. This study describes the current strategies being employed to treat SE in the USA.

Methods

Fifteen American academic medical centers completed a retrospective, multicenter, observational study by reviewing 10?C20 of the most recent cases of SE at their institution prior to December 31, 2009. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with cessation of seizures.

Results

A total of 150 patients were included. Most patients with SE had a seizure disorder (58?%). SE patients required a median of 3 AEDs for treatment. Three quarters of patients received a benzodiazepine as first-line therapy (74.7?%). Phenytoin (33.3?%) and levetiracetam (10?%) were commonly used as the second AED. Continuous infusions of propofol, barbiturate, or benzodiazepine were used in 36?% of patients. Median time to resolution of SE was 1?day and was positively associated with presence of a complex partial seizure, AED non-compliance prior to admission, and lorazepam plus another AED as initial therapy. Prolonged ICU length of stay and topiramate therapy prior to admission were negatively associated with SE resolution. Mortality was higher in patients without a history of seizure (22.2?vs 6.9?%, p?=?0.006).

Conclusions

The use of a benzodiazepine followed by an AED, such as phenytoin or levetiracetam, is common as first and second-line therapy for SE and appears to be associated with a shorter time to SE resolution. AED selection thereafter is highly variable. Patients without a history of seizure who develop SE had a higher mortality rate.     

Basic Science

Jarogniew J. Luszczki , Marta M. Andres , Piotr Czuczwar , Anna Cioczek-Czuczwar , Neville Ratnaraj , Philip N. Patsalos , and Stanislaw J. Czuczwar
Approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy do not experience satisfactory seizure control with current front-line antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy and often require polytherapy. The potential usefulness of AED combinations, in terms of efficacy and adverse effects, is therefore of major importance. The present study sought to identify potentially useful AED combinations with levetiracetam (LEV), recently introduced as an effective AED for refractory partial seizures. The mouse maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model was investigated with regard to the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, phenobarbital (PB), valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC), administered singly and in combination with LEV. Acute adverse effects were ascertained by use of the chimney test, evaluating motor performance, and the passive avoidance task, assessing long-term memory. Brain AED concentrations were determined to ascertain any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed antiseizure effect. LEV in combination with TPM exerted supraadditive (synergistic) interactions in the MES test. Likewise, the combinations of LEV with CBZ and OXC were supraadditive in this test. In contrast, all other LEV/AED combinations displayed additivity. Furthermore, none of the investigated combinations altered motor performance and long-term memory. LEV brain concentrations were unaffected by concomitant AED administration, and LEV had no significant effect on brain concentrations of concomitant AEDs. These preclinical data would suggest that LEV in combination with TPM is associated with beneficial anticonvulsant pharmacodynamic interactions. Similar, but less profound effects were seen with OXC and CBZ.     

High‐dose intravenous levetiracetam for acute seizure exacerbation in children with intractable epilepsy

We review our experience with high‐dose intravenous levetiracetam (IV‐LEV) for acute seizure exacerbations in nine children with medically intractable epilepsy. All children had acute repetitive seizures—while on chronic antiepileptic drugs—that either led to hospitalization (eight) or occurred during hospitalization (one), and received doses of IV‐LEV of 150 mg/kg/day or greater, with a mean dose of 228 ± 48 mg/kg/day. Eight of nine children had resolution of the acute repetitive seizures. Seizure frequency was reduced to less than baseline in seven children (seizure‐free in two, ≥80% reduction in four, and 50% reduction in one). Except for one child with increased seizures, IV‐LEV was well tolerated in all children without complications.     

Discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs after successful epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and risk factors for seizure recurrence subsequent to antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal in patients who underwent surgical treatment for intractable partial epilepsy and were rendered seizure-free. METHODS: The outcome of discontinuation of AED medication was studied retrospectively in 210 consecutive patients who were rendered seizure-free after epilepsy surgery performed between 1989 and 1993. RESULTS: Medical therapy was reduced in 96 patients and discontinued in 84 patients. The seizure recurrence rate after complete AED withdrawal was 14% and 36% at 2 and 5 years. In contrast, only 3% and 7% of the 30 patients who did not alter AED treatment after surgery had recurrent seizures in the same time intervals. After AED discontinuation, seizures tended to recur more often in patients with normal preoperative MRI studies compared with those with focal pathology. However, this difference did not reach significance. Intraoperative electrocorticography, extent of surgical resection, postoperative EEG, and seizure-free duration after surgery were not predictive of seizure outcome after AED withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: AED withdrawal was associated with seizure recurrence in a significant portion of patients rendered seizure-free by epilepsy surgery. Patients with a normal preoperative MRI study showed a tendency for higher seizure recurrence, whereas the duration of seizure-free postoperative AED treatment interval did not significantly influence the seizure recurrence rate. These results will prove useful in counseling patients about discontinuing AED treatment after successful epilepsy surgery.     

An open-label study of levetiracetam at individualised doses between 1000 and 3000 mg day(-1) in adult patients with refractory epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The novel antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for partial epilepsy. The primary aim of this study was to measure the safety and tolerability of LEV individualised dosing in a heterogeneous refractory epilepsy population.METHODS: LEV was evaluated in a 10- to 16-week open-label, multicentre study in adult patients with epilepsy refractory to previous treatment with at least two AEDs. Individualised LEV doses up to 3000 mg x day(-1) were determined in an initial up-titration phase, and optimal doses were administered as adjunctive treatment during an 8- to 10-week evaluation period. Concomitant AEDs and their doses could not be changed during the study. Safety and tolerability were monitored by expression of adverse events as well as by retention rate. The effect of LEV on concomitant AED concentration was also studied. Efficacy was assessed using global clinical evaluation (GCE) scores, seizure frequency, and >or=50% responder rate. RESULTS: LEV therapy was initiated in 219 patients; 183 had localisation-related epilepsy and 37 had generalised epilepsy. In one patient, epileptic syndrome was defined as both localisation-related and generalised. About 81.7% (179/219) continued and completed treatment throughout the study, and 79% (172/219) chose to continue LEV in a follow-up study. The most common adverse events were asthenia, dizziness, and somnolence. Most adverse events occurred during up-titration. LEV treatment did not alter the concentration of concomitant AEDs. LEV improved GCE scores in 79.5% (152/191) of patients. LEV reduced the median total seizure frequency of all patients from a median of 2.25 seizures per week at baseline (n=219) to 1.10 seizures per week during the evaluation period (n=191 patients with at least one seizure count during evaluation). The >or=50% responder rate was 48.2% for all seizure types, 49.4% for partial-onset, and 51.4% for generalised-onset seizures. Throughout the evaluation period (i.e. from the start of the evaluation period until completion or early discontinuation), 26/191 (13.6%) had a 100% reduction in total seizure frequency, while in a follow-up study, 10.5% (18/172) were seizure-free for at least 6 months and 6.4% (11/172) were seizure-free for at least 1 year. CONCLUSION: LEV was well tolerated, as evidenced by limited adverse event reporting and the high retention rate, and appeared effective in both generalised and partial epilepsy.     

Levetiracetam monotherapy for late poststroke seizures in the elderly

Stroke is the most common cause of seizures in the elderly. Antiepileptic drugs are used to treat most patients with late poststroke seizures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) in patients aged 60 or older with late-onset poststroke seizures. This prospective study evaluated patients 60 years of age or older, who had at least two late-onset poststroke seizures and were given LEV monotherapy. Demographic data and seizure and stroke characteristics were recorded. Outpatient visits were made after 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months and every 3 months thereafter, and the effectiveness and tolerability of LEV were investigated. Thirty-four patients with a mean age of 69.76+/-6.41 were included in this study. Average seizure frequency before treatment was 3.61+/-3.02/month. Mean follow-up time was 17.68+/-3.24 months. At daily doses of 1000-2000 mg, 82.4% of the patients were seizure free, and 7 patients (20.6%) had side effects. LEV was discontinued in one patient because of severe somnolence. Two patients were switched to another antiepileptic drug because of uncontrolled seizures despite an increase in dose up to 3000 mg/day. LEV monotherapy can be effective and well tolerated in elderly patients with late-onset poststroke seizures.     

Efficacy of anti-epileptic drugs in patients with gliomas and seizures

Although seizures in brain tumor patients are common, the knowledge on optimal anti-seizure therapy in this patient group is limited. An observational study was carried out using a database of all patients from the neuro-oncology service during the period 2000–2005, with data on seizure characteristics, therapy with AEDs, the underlying brain tumor and its treatment. A total of 140 brain tumor patients were studied of whom 23.6% had a low-grade glioma, 53.6% a high-grade glioma, and 22.8% belonged to a mixed group existing of ependymoma, meningioma, and brain metastasis. Epilepsy as the presenting sign was more frequent in low-grade vs. high-grade gliomas (69.7 vs. 52%, P = 0.087), and a total of 75.8% of patients developed seizures with low-grade and of 80.0% with high-grade gliomas. Of all 99 patients with seizures, 80.1% received valproic acid (VPA) as first choice, and either levetiracetam (LEV), carbamazepine (CBZ) or lamotrigine (LMT) as the most frequent next choice. Patients treated with a combination of VPA and LEV showed the highest percentage of responders (81.5%), with a decline in seizure frequency of more than two categories in 55.6% and seizure freedom in 59%. No correlation was found between the use of VPA and survival. A combination of VPA and LEV seems effective, if seizure control cannot be achieved by VPA alone. This indicates that adding levetiracetam may be preferable over sequential trials of AED monotherapy in treatment-resistant seizures in patients with brain tumors.     

Levetiracetam for people with mental retardation and refractory epilepsy

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) with efficacy against a wide range of seizures types. The aim of this observational study was to assess its effectiveness in patients with mental retardation and refractory epilepsy. Sixty-four patients were started on adjunctive LEV after a 3-month baseline. LEV was initially dosed at 250 mg daily and increased by 250 mg every 2 weeks thereafter according to clinical response. Caregivers rated the patient's sleep, appetite, alertness, and behavior as poor (1), reasonable (2), or good (3) at each clinic visit. Patients were reviewed until one of four endpoints was reached: seizure freedom for at least 6 months, > or = 50% reduction in seizure frequency (responder) over a 6-month period, <50% reduction in seizure frequency (marginal effect) over a 6-month period, or LEV withdrawal due to lack of efficacy, adverse effects, or both. Twenty-four (38%) patients became seizure-free, 10 of whom were controlled on LEV 250 mg twice daily. An additional 18 (28%) patients were classified as responders, and 8 (12%) reported only marginal benefit from adjunctive LEV. Fourteen (22%) patients discontinued LEV (6 worsening seizures, 1 lack of efficacy, 7 adverse effects). Caregivers rated combined sleep, appetite, alertness, and behavior scores as "improved" at the end of follow-up (P<0.001). LEV improved seizure control in the majority of patients with mental retardation and may also have enhanced their quality of life.     

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in infants and young children with refractory epilepsy.

The aim of this multicentric, retrospective, and uncontrolled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) in 81 children younger than 4 years with refractory epilepsy. At an average follow-up period of 9 months, LEV administration was found to be effective in 30% of patients (responders showing more than a 50% decrease in seizure frequency) of whom 10 (12%) became seizure free. This efficacy was observed for focal (46%) as well as for generalized seizures (42%). In addition, in a group of 48 patients, we compared the initial efficacy (evaluated at an average of 3 months of follow-up) and the retention at a mean of 12 months of LEV, with regard to loss of efficacy (defined as the return to the baseline seizure frequency). Twenty-two patients (46%) were initial responders. After a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, 9 of 48 patients (19%) maintained the improvement, 4 (8%) of whom remained seizure free. A loss of efficacy was observed in 13 of the initial responders (59%). Maintained LEV efficacy was noted in patients with focal epilepsy and West syndrome. LEV was well tolerated. Adverse events were seen in 18 (34%) patients. The main side effects were drowsiness and nervousness. Adverse events were either tolerable or resolved in time with dosage reduction or discontinuation of the drug. We conclude that LEV is safe and effective for a wide range of epileptic seizures and epilepsy syndromes and, therefore, represents a valid therapeutic option in infants and young children affected by epilepsy.     

The use of levetiracetam in refractory status epilepticus.

Six patients with status epilepticus (SE) of various etiologies refractory to at least two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) had complete cessation of their seizures following administration of oral levetiracetam (LEV). Seizure types included convulsive, focal, and nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Effective doses of levetiracetam ranged from 500 to 3000 mg/day, achieving seizure control within 12-96 h. No significant adverse events were noted. Adjunctive levetiracetam should be considered for patients with status epilepticus unresponsive to initial therapy.     

Levetiracetam monotherapy for elderly patients with epilepsy.

We retrospectively identified 14 elderly patients with a history of partial seizures who received levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy. Patients began LEV either as first line therapy (n=5) or were converted to LEV monotherapy (n=9) after failing prior antiepileptic medications (AEDs). Thirteen patients continued on LEV monotherapy for at least 6 months. One patient was lost to follow-up. Eight patients (61.5%) became seizure free. Four patients who began LEV as a first line therapy became seizure free, whereas the remaining four patients who converted to LEV after they failed their previous AEDs became seizure free. Four patients (30.7%) had more than a 50% seizure reduction of seizures. Only one patient had no significant change in seizure frequency after started on LEV. The total dosages used to control seizures were 500-3000 mg/day, (mean 1839.2 mg/day). LEV monotherapy can be effective and well tolerated in this group of patients. A prospective, larger, double blind monotherapy study is needed to confirm this finding.