Maintenance of infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a one-year randomized controlled trial comparing systematic versus on-demand treatment

OBJECTIVE: Continuous treatment with the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) antibody infliximab is efficacious in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), whereas treatment discontinuation results in disease relapse, with variable delay. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of continuous treatment with infliximab with that of a treatment regimen adapted to symptom recurrence. Methotrexate (MTX) in combination with infliximab was also tested. METHODS: Patients with active AS were randomly assigned at week 0 to receive infliximab every 6 weeks (continuous treatment) or upon symptom recurrence (on-demand treatment), following infusions at weeks 4, 6, and 10. Patients in the on-demand group were randomly assigned to receive either MTX in combination with infliximab or infliximab alone. Patients were monitored for 1 year. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who met the ASsessment in AS International Working Group criteria for 20% improvement (ASAS20) at week 58. RESULTS: Of 247 patients, 124 were assigned to receive infliximab every 6 weeks and 123 to receive on-demand treatment. Among the latter, 62 received MTX, and 61 received infliximab alone. A greater proportion of patients receiving infliximab every 6 weeks fulfilled ASAS20 response criteria at week 58 than did patients receiving on-demand treatment (75% versus 46%; P<0.0001). Patients in the continuous treatment group received more infliximab infusions after week 10 than did those in the on-demand group (mean+/-SD 5.8+/-2.2 versus 3.5+/-2; P<0.0001). Addition of MTX did not significantly affect the proportion of patients with an ASAS20 response at week 58, nor the number of infliximab infusions administered. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that continuous treatment of AS with infliximab is more efficacious than on-demand treatment, and that the addition of MTX to infliximab provides no significant benefit.     

Clinical and imaging correlates of response to treatment with infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVES: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic disease leading to progressive spinal ankylosis and deformity. The aims of this study were to (1) determine whether infliximab is an effective treatment for AS patients who have failed conventional treatment; (2) identify any baseline clinical variables that can be associated with responsiveness to treatment; and (3) resolve whether the clinical response correlated with changes from baseline inflammatory changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Twenty-one patients who met the modified New York criteria for AS (M:F 18:3) were enrolled in this open labeled study. The mean age was 37.9+/-7.9 years and mean disease duration was 8.69+/-6.58 years. Patients received infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at 0, 2, 6, weeks. Nine functional variables were measured [i.e., Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) etc.], 6 clinimetrics (chest expansion, finger to floor, etc.), and inflammatory markers in the peripheral blood at baseline and each subsequent visit. Primary response to treatment was defined as a > 20% response in 5/9 functional variables. A subset of 9 consecutive patients was selected for MRI scans before and after infusions. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were available for assessment at week 14 having received 3 infusions (wks 0, 2, 6). There was > 60% improvement in functional variables, i.e., BASDAI, BASFI, Health Assessment Questionnaire, fatigue, and spinal and total body pain. Clinimetric scores selectively improved, e.g., chest expansion (p < 0.021) by 14 weeks. ESR, CRP and haptoglobin all showed significant improvement at 6 weeks and were maintained to the 14 week assessment point. Imaging studies showed improvement in all patients studied including those with advanced disease. Three patients developed headache during the infusions. Infliximab was effective in all, but degree of response varied. Very good responders were distinguished from good responders by shorter duration of disease and better baseline clinimetric scores. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab was an effective treatment for AS in a short term trial. Longterm control of symptoms and potential alteration in clinical course of disease will require longterm assessment.     

The use of infliximab in academic rheumatology practice: an audit of early clinical experience

OBJECTIVE: To audit a first clinical experience of treating rheumatic disease patients with infliximab in the setting of an academic tertiary care rheumatology practice. METHODS: The infusion history of patients referred to the McGill University Health Centre during the first 18 month period of a special access program for treatment with infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor-a antibody, was audited for disease characteristics, dosing schedule for infliximab, concomitant treatments, response rate, and side effect profile. RESULTS: Forty-one patients received a total of 300 infusions of infliximab over a period of 9 +/- 5 months (mean +/- standard deviation). Rheumatic disease indications were rheumatoid arthritis in 30, spondyloarthropathy in 6, psoriatic arthritis in 2, juvenile onset polyarthritis in 2, and scleroderma in one. Disease duration was 17 +/- 11 years. Concomitant treatment with steroids and methotrexate was present in 68% and 54%, respectively. Infliximab treatment was continued beyond 5 infusions or 22 weeks in 63%. Of the 26 patients continuing treatment, adjustment to dosing and/or interval schedule of infusions was made in 58%. The clinical response rate was moderately to greatly improved in 96%. Severe side effects considered directly related to the treatment were observed in 6 (15%) patients; less severe side effects, which did not preclude continuation of treatment but frequently required medical intervention, were noted in 93%. CONCLUSION: Infliximab is a valuable treatment for patients with resistant rheumatic diseases in the short term. Both the serious, and the frequent, more benign complication rate observed in this group of patients should alert physicians to be vigilant in the routine care of patients treated with infliximab.     

Infusion-related reactions to infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a clinical practice setting: relationship to dose, antihistamine pretreatment, and infusion number

OBJECTIVE: We describe infusion-related reactions to infliximab (during infusion or within 1 hour postinfusion) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated in a quaternary care center. METHODS: We followed 113 patients for a mean of 60.6 +/- 28.9 weeks, obtaining 10.5 +/- 4.9 infusions per patient. RESULTS: We observed 1183 infusions resulting in 104 infusion reactions (8.8%). All reactions resolved within several hours following cessation of the infusion and none was serious enough to warrant hospitalization. Reactions included allergic reactions (pruritis, urticaria) in 4.2% of infusions, cardiopulmonary (hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia) in 3.0%, and miscellaneous reactions (headache, nausea, vomiting) in 2.0%. Reactions occurred in 8.0% of 3 mg/kg infusions and in 10.3% of 5 mg/kg infusions. Reactions occurred in 13.2% of infusions that involved antihistamine pretreatment compared to only 7.5% of infusions that involved no pretreatment. At both infliximab doses, there was a similar frequency of infusion reactions in patients pretreated due to a previous infusion (12.6%) compared to those pretreated strictly based on infusion number (14.7%). A number of the reactions involving antihistamine pretreatment may be explained by known side effects of diphenhydramine, including headache, dizziness, nausea, and palpitations. CONCLUSION: Infusion-related reactions to infliximab were infrequent, rarely severe, and easily manageable. The frequency of reactions was equivalent in patients treated with 3 mg/kg compared to 5 mg/kg. Reactions were significantly more frequent in infusions where patients were pretreated with the antihistamine diphenhydramine, compared to those not involving pretreatment.     

Pattern of infliximab utilization in rheumatoid arthritis patients at an academic medical center

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pattern of use of infliximab with an emphasis on treatment escalation and the durability of infliximab use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an academic setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pharmacy and medical records of 183 patients with RA who received at least 1 infliximab infusion at the infusion centers of the Brigham and Women's Hospital. Treatment escalation was defined as an increase in the dosage of infliximab to >3 mg/kg and/or a decrease in the dosing interval to <7 weeks between infusions. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with RA received infliximab infusions for a mean +/- SD duration of 58.2 +/- 56.6 weeks. Infliximab was discontinued in 48% of the patients during the first year of therapy and in 67% of the patients overall. A total of 126 patients had a treatment escalation, including 25 patients with a dose increase, 35 patients with a decrease in the interval, and 66 patients with both. Infliximab treatment was associated with a decrease in corticosteroid and methotrexate doses. Patients who had a treatment escalation were more likely to continue infliximab infusions compared with patients without a treatment escalation (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-4.1). CONCLUSION: The use of infliximab may be an effective treatment for RA; however, a substantial number of patients will discontinue its use. Treatment escalation is commonly used in the management of RA with infliximab and is associated with longer duration of infliximab use.     

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation of TNF-alpha serum level with clinical response and benefit from changing dose or frequency of infliximab infusions

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between serum TNF-alpha level and clinical response in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated by infliximab. This could be of value to predict clinical response to infliximab and to determine the optimal dose and interval between dosing of infliximab. RA patients who did not respond adequately to conventional doses (3 mg/kg) of infliximab were studied to see if increasing the dose or frequency of infliximab infusions would be more effective. METHODS: Fifty-five RA patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria and were receiving treatment by anti-TNF-alpha (infliximab 3 mg/kg body weight every 8 weeks) were evaluated by: clinical disease activity using the Richie score index before receiving their scheduled infliximab infusion. Serum level of TNF-alpha, as measured by competitive ELISA assay, was determined immediately before and 9-11 days after receiving infliximab. RA patients who did not respond adequately to treatment with infliximab were given either a larger dose of infliximab or given the infusion at six-week intervals. Their clinical response was then evaluated sixteen months later. RESULTS Patients were divided into 2 groups according to Richie score, active group with score > 10 (score 20.3 +/- 7.7 mean +/- standard deviation, n = 25) and inactive group with scores < or = 10 (score 4.1 +/- 3.2, n = 30). TNF-alpha serum levels pre-infliximab infusion were significantly higher in the active group 76.1 pg/ml than the inactive group 38.0 pg/ml (P < 0.02). Whereas TNF serum level significantly dropped post infliximab in the inactive group (P < 0.05), it did not drop in the active group. The mean level of the post-infusion TNF-alpha serum level was higher (76.6 +/- 93.4 ng/ml) in the-active than the mean level of the post-infusion serum TNF-alpha levels in the inactive group (26.4 ng/ml +/- 7.9) P < 0.01 using the t-test. Increasing the frequency was superior in RA patients' clinical outcome than increasing the dose of infliximab infusions. CONCLUSION: RA patients who responded well to infliximab and had inactive disease at the time of the study have lower levels of serum TNF-alpha which could be further suppressed by the recommended doses of infliximab. RA patients with active disease have higher serum levels of TNF-alpha which could not be suppressed after the recommended doses of infliximab infusion. Changing the frequency of infliximab infusions in the active group was more effective than increasing the dose of infliximab in inducing improved clinical outcome. We suggest that the lack of suppression of TNF-alpha in the active group could be due to inadequate dosing of infliximab or to the presence of a neutralizing antibody directed against infliximab. It remains to be seen if serum TNF-alpha levels could be used as a guide in determining the dose and intervals between dosing of anti-TNF therapy in RA in order to achieve the desired clinical response.     

Chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate therapy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of single and multiple doses of a chimeric anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had active disease despite therapy with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with active RA despite receiving therapy with 10 mg/week of MTX were randomized to receive a single, blinded infusion of either placebo or 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg infliximab. Twenty-three patients who completed the blinded study entered an open, multiple dose extension study in which they received up to 3 additional infusions of 10 mg/kg infliximab at Weeks 12, 20, and 28. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated during the blinded and open trial. RESULTS: There were no serious infusion related reactions. In the blinded phase, 17 (81.0%) of 21 patients receiving infliximab achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response at some point during the 12 weeks of followup compared to one (14.3%) of 7 patients receiving placebo (p = 0.003). Clinical improvement was evident by the first week and was sustained through Week 12. For the 19 patients who received infliximab during the blinded part of the trial and continued into the open label trial, 53% maintained an ACR 20% response with multiple infusions of 10 mg/kg infliximab through Week 40. Three patients withdrew from the trial during the open continuation phase because of adverse events: cellulitis, infusion related dizziness and headache, and vasculitic rash. Infliximab in doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg had a mean terminal half-life ranging from 9 to 12 days and was detectable in sera from most patients 8 to 12 weeks after dosing. CONCLUSION: Infliximab is generally well tolerated during 40 weeks of therapy. A single infusion of 5 to 20 mg/kg infliximab significantly decreases the signs and symptoms of RA compared to placebo in patients with active disease receiving MTX. Multiple doses of infliximab produce sustained clinical benefit for up to 40 weeks.     

Persistent clinical response to the anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over 3 years

OBJECTIVE: Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), is approved in Europe for the treatment of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have responded inadequately to conventional therapy. This report provides analyses from a 3-yr extension study, as a follow-up to both the 1- and 2-yr open label extensions of the original 3-month randomized controlled trial of infliximab in patients with AS. METHODS: Of the 49 patients with AS who completed the second year of the study, 46 continued treatment with infliximab 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks up to week 156. The Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath AS Functional Index, the Bath AS Metrology Index, patient's and physician's global assessments, quality of life (Short Form-36), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were assessed throughout the study period. RESULTS: The improvement of signs and symptoms observed in the majority of the patients during the first and second year was sustained throughout the third year of the study. Forty-three patients (62% of the 69 patients enrolled at baseline and 93% of the patients who started the third year) completed week 156. In the intention-to-treat analysis, an ASAS '5 out of 6' and ASAS 40% response was seen by 46% and 50% of the patients, respectively. The scores for other efficacy assessments were similar to the values observed at weeks 54 and 102. Median CRP levels remained low (1.5 mg/l at week 156). There were no relevant side-effects and no discontinuation because of drug-related adverse events during the third year of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS receiving infliximab for 3 yr showed a durable clinical response without loss of efficacy. Long-term infliximab treatment was well tolerated by patients in this study.     

Low-dose infliximab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis--clinically- and cost-effective

OBJECTIVES: Infliximab has been shown to be effective in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) when treated in a dose of 5 mg/kg at 6 weekly intervals. This dose of infliximab has not been determined by any structured randomized trials and has significant cost implications. We describe our experience of treating AS with low-dose infliximab (3mg/kg at 8 weekly intervals). The efficacy and cost implications are discussed. METHODS: Patients who had active AS [Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) > or = 4] were treated with infliximab 3 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks and thereafter at 8 weekly intervals. Response to treatment was defined as 50% improvement in BASDAI. Other response criteria such as ASAS 20, 40 and five of the six criteria were also assessed. Direct drug costs for infliximab were determined. RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive AS patients received infliximab. All 22 completed treatment for 3 months, 15 patients for 6 months and 14 for 12 months. Mean age was 45 years (range 21-62) and mean disease duration 14.5 years (range 2-43). Of the patients, 54% achieved a 50% BASDAI response at 3 months and the benefit was sustained at 12 months in 63%. Similar response rate was seen with the other assessment criteria. Direct drug costs were significantly lower when low-dose infliximab regimen was used. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose infliximab (3 mg/kg at 8 weekly infusions) is effective in the treatment of AS. Higher doses are required in a small proportion of patients when treatment is only partially effective. Titrating the dose and frequency of infusions may be required in individual patients to achieve optimal response. Using low-dose infliximab has significant economic implications.     

Successful treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody infliximab

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) has been detected in sacroiliac joint biopsy specimens from patients with spondylarthropathy. The present open pilot study was undertaken to test the efficacy of the anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody infliximab in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Eleven patients with AS of short duration (median 5 years, range 0.5-13 years) that had been active for at least 3 months (range 3-72 months) were treated with 3 infusions of infliximab (at weeks 0, 2, and 6), in a dosage of 5 mg/kg. Ten of the 11 patients had elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (>6 mg/liter) before treatment; these elevations were known to have had persisted > 1 year in at least 3 patients. The Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), pain as measured on a visual analog scale, and the Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) were assessed. Quality of life was assessed using the Short Form 36 instrument. Laboratory markers of disease activity, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, were determined. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine was performed in 5 patients. RESULTS: One patient withdrew from the study due to the occurrence of urticarial xanthoma 8 days after the first infusion. At study enrollment, 3 of 5 patients had evidence of spinal inflammation (spondylitis and spondylodiscitis) as detected by MRI; followup MRI 2-6 weeks after the third infusion revealed improvement in 2. Improvement of > or = 50% in activity, function, and pain scores was documented in 9 of 10 patients; the median improvement in the BASDAI after 4 weeks was 70% (range 41-94%). This clear-cut benefit lasted for 6 weeks after the third infusion in 8 of 10 patients. The median CRP level decreased from 15.5 mg/liter (range <6-90.8) to normal, and the median IL-6 level from 12.4 mg/liter (range 0-28.4) to normal (<5). There was improvement in all 9 SF-36 concepts; the improvement was significant for 6 concepts. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that anti-TNFalpha therapy is very effective for several weeks in AS. Whether this therapy, in addition to its antiinflammatory effect, prevents ankylosis remains to be determined.     

Infliximab in combination with methotrexate in active ankylosing spondylitis: a clinical and imaging study

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of infliximab combined with methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) using MRI and DXA to monitor its impact on bone. METHODS: In this single centre study 42 subjects with active AS were treated with methotrexate and were randomly assigned, in a ratio of 2:1, to receive five infusions of either 5 mg/kg infliximab or placebo over 30 weeks. The primary outcome was improvement in disease activity as shown by the BASDAI at week 30. MRI was used to assess the effect of treatments on sacroiliac and spinal enthesitis/osteitis and DXA to monitor bone mineral density. RESULTS: Both therapeutic agents were well tolerated with no dropouts due to adverse events. A significantly greater improvement in mean BASDAI score was seen in the infliximab arm at week 10 (p = 0.017) than in the placebo arm, but this was not maintained by week 30 (p = 0.195), 8 weeks after the last infusion, at which stage disease flares were reported by some subjects. MRI showed that the mean number of lesions resolving for each subject from week 0 to week 30 was significantly greater in the combination group than in the methotrexate monotherapy group (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab in combination with methotrexate was a safe and efficacious treatment in AS over 6 months and was associated with significant regression in enthesitis/osteitis as determined by MRI. However, disease flares were reported 8 weeks after the last infusion, indicating that addition of methotrexate failed to extend the infliximab dosing interval.     

Combined therapy with infliximab and seton drainage for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease with anal endosonographic monitoring: a single-centre experience

During infliximab treatment of perianal Crohn's disease (CD), the healing of the skin opening precedes fistula tract healing and this contributes to abscess formation and fistula recurrence. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of combined treatment with infliximab and setons for complex perianal fistulas in CD and to define the optimal time for seton removal by anal endosonography (AE). Nine consecutive patients with CD were studied. Perianal sepsis was eradicated when necessary and setons were placed before infliximab therapy. Setons were removed after AE evidence of fistulous tracts healing. Patients received a mean of 10+/-2.3 infliximab infusions. At week 6 all patients showed a reduction in mean CD activity index (p<0.005) and perianal disease activity index (p<0.0001). Complete fistula response was achieved in eight of nine patients. In six patients after a mean of 9.2 infusions, infliximab treatment was discontinued. Clinical and AE response persisted at 19.4+/-8.8 months (range 3-28 months) in five of these patients. One patient had fistula recurrence 20 weeks after infliximab discontinuation and responded rapidly to retreatment. At the time of this report, two patients were still on infliximab and in remission after a mean follow-up of 25+/-5 months. Combined therapy with infliximab and setons with AE monitoring of the response showed high efficacy in the management of patients with CD with complex perianal fistulas.     

Open label study to assess infliximab safety and timing of onset of clinical benefit among patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing of onset of clinical benefit following the initial infusion of infliximab and to obtain additional safety experience of infliximab when given in an office setting to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In addition, the safety of reducing the infusion time from 2 hours to 1 hour was evaluated. METHODS: Patients (n = 553) with active RA despite receiving methotrexate (MTX) were treated with infliximab 3 mg/kg given over 2 h at baseline (Week 0), and Weeks 2, 6, and 14 in this multicenter open-label trial. Patients continued to receive a stable dose of MTX (> or = 7.5 mg/wk). At selected sites, patients tolerating the first 4 infusions were eligible to receive 2 additional infusions at twice the usual infusion rate (given over 1 h). Patients returned for efficacy assessments at 48 h following the initial infusion and several times throughout study participation. RESULTS: By 48 h following the first infusion, significant (p < 0.001) improvements were observed in duration of morning stiffness (34% mean improvement), physician's global disease assessment scores (30%), patient's global disease assessment scores (25%), and patient's pain assessment scores (30%). By Week 16, 52 to 63% mean improvements in these efficacy variables were observed (p < 0.001), the significant improvement was maintained through the end of study participation in the subset of patients who received the additional 1 h infliximab infusions. Through 16 weeks, 10% (54/553) of patients reported an adverse event associated with at least 1 of the 4 infusion procedures; the majority were mild and transient in nature. In the subset of 197 patients who received 2 additional infusions over 1 h, no increase in the frequency or severity of infusion-related adverse events was observed compared to the 2 h infusion. CONCLUSION: Infliximab administered to patients with RA in an outpatient setting resulted in significant clinical improvement within 48 h that was sustained with additional infusions. Approximately 10% of patients experienced an infusion reaction, highlighting the need for direct supervision over patient treatment. Patients who tolerated infliximab infusions given over 2 h also tolerated a 1 h infusion.     

Maintenance of infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a one‐year randomized controlled trial comparing systematic versus on‐demand treatment

Objective

Continuous treatment with the anti–tumor necrosis factor α (anti‐TNFα) antibody infliximab is efficacious in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), whereas treatment discontinuation results in disease relapse, with variable delay. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of continuous treatment with infliximab with that of a treatment regimen adapted to symptom recurrence. Methotrexate (MTX) in combination with infliximab was also tested.

Methods

Patients with active AS were randomly assigned at week 0 to receive infliximab every 6 weeks (continuous treatment) or upon symptom recurrence (on‐demand treatment), following infusions at weeks 4, 6, and 10. Patients in the on‐demand group were randomly assigned to receive either MTX in combination with infliximab or infliximab alone. Patients were monitored for 1 year. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who met the ASsessment in AS International Working Group criteria for 20% improvement (ASAS20) at week 58.

Results

Of 247 patients, 124 were assigned to receive infliximab every 6 weeks and 123 to receive on‐demand treatment. Among the latter, 62 received MTX, and 61 received infliximab alone. A greater proportion of patients receiving infliximab every 6 weeks fulfilled ASAS20 response criteria at week 58 than did patients receiving on‐demand treatment (75% versus 46%; P < 0.0001). Patients in the continuous treatment group received more infliximab infusions after week 10 than did those in the on‐demand group (mean ± SD 5.8 ± 2.2 versus 3.5 ± 2; P < 0.0001). Addition of MTX did not significantly affect the proportion of patients with an ASAS20 response at week 58, nor the number of infliximab infusions administered.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that continuous treatment of AS with infliximab is more efficacious than on‐demand treatment, and that the addition of MTX to infliximab provides no significant benefit.

     

Infliximab inhibits progression of radiographic damage in patients with active psoriatic arthritis through one year of treatment: Results from the induction and maintenance psoriatic arthritis clinical trial 2

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of infliximab on progression of structural damage over 1 year in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the Induction and Maintenance Psoriatic Arthritis Clinical Trial 2. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 200 patients with active PsA were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 54. At week 24, patients initially assigned to receive placebo crossed over to receive infliximab (5 mg/kg). Based on predefined criteria, patients randomized to receive placebo could enter early escape by receiving infliximab (5 mg/kg) starting at week 16, and patients randomized to receive infliximab could have the dose increased to 10 mg/kg starting at week 38. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were randomized to receive. Radiographs of hands and feet were obtained at baseline and at weeks 24 and 54. Two readers blinded to treatment assignment and radiograph sequence independently evaluated erosions and joint space narrowing using the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method modified for PsA. RESULTS: At week 24, patients randomized to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg had significantly less radiographic progression compared with patients randomized to receive placebo, with mean +/- SD changes from baseline in the total Sharp/van der Heijde score of -0.70 +/- 2.53 and 0.82 +/- 2.62, respectively (P < 0.001). At week 54, mean +/- SD changes from baseline in the total Sharp/van der Heijde score were -0.94 +/- 3.40 in patients randomized to receive infliximab and 0.53 +/- 2.60 in those receiving placebo/infliximab (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Infliximab significantly inhibits radiographic progression in patients with PsA as early as 6 months after starting treatment, and the beneficial effect continues through 1 year of infliximab therapy.     

Treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis vulgaris with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor infliximab

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple infusions with achimeric, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis vulgaris. METHODS: Over 22 weeks, nine patients with both active psoriasis and PsA received five infusions of 3 mg/kg infliximab. The endpoints included changes in the swollen and tender joints counts, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for improvement response rates 20, 50, and 70, and improvement in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). RESULTS: The swollen count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) fell from means of 5.33+/-2.22 and 17.80+/-4.21 to 1.44+/-1.09 and 9.77+/-0.92, respectively, by week 2 ( P=0.02, P=0.02). This benefit was sustained through week 22 (2.00+/-1.12/7.77+/-3.68, P=0.05/ P=0.002). The ACR 20/50/70 response was achieved in 89%/56%/22% of cases. The mean PASI score improved from 19.04+/-5.41 to 4.91+/-2.51 ( P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Multiple infusions of infliximab were effective and well tolerated in patients with active psoriasis and PsA.     

Active but transient improvement of endothelial function in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing long-term treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of excessive mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Atherosclerosis and RA share similar inflammatory mechanisms that include involvement of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha). Anti-TNF alpha antibody improved endothelial function in RA patients after a 12-week treatment. The aim of the present study was to assess whether improvement of endothelial function is still effective in long-term infliximab-treated RA patients. METHODS: Seven RA patients (5 women; age range 25-73 years) were studied. They had been treated with infliximab for at least 1 year and were currently being treated with this drug every 8 weeks. Endothelial-dependent and independent vasodilatation were measured by brachial ultrasonography. RESULTS: Following infliximab infusion, a rapid increase in the percentage of endothelial-dependent vasodilatation was found in all patients (mean +/- SD 9.4 +/- 5.5% 2 days postinfusion compared with 2.8 +/- 2.5% 2 days before infusion). However, values returned to baseline by 4 weeks after infusion. There were no differences in the percentage of endothelial-independent vasodilatation prior to and after infusion. A decrease in the individual disease activity score for each patient was observed at day 7 postinfusion (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms an active but transient effect of infliximab on endothelial function in RA patients treated periodically with this drug. It may support long-term use of drugs that block TNF alpha function to reduce the high incidence of cardiovascular complications in RA.     

In SAPHO syndrome anti-TNF-alpha therapy may induce persistent amelioration of osteoarticular complaints, but may exacerbate cutaneous manifestations

OBJECTIVES: SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis) is a rare disease combining skin, bone and joint manifestations. In recent years new therapeutic strategies have been tried, among them TNF-alpha-blocking agents. We report our experience with infliximab in four cases of SAPHO syndrome refractory to conventional therapies. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2005, four cases of SAPHO syndrome (two females and two males; mean age 49.7 yr) responding poorly to conventional drugs were treated with infliximab. The dose was 5 mg/kg, according to the protocol used in spondyloarthropathies, with infusions at 0, 2 and 6 weeks followed by 6 weeks intervals. No active cutaneous manifestations were present at the time of starting therapy. RESULTS: Complete remission of osteoarticular involvement was achieved after the second or third infusion, and the positive response was maintained for up to 12 months. A patient relapsed after discontinuation of infliximab, because of infectious complication. Palmoplantaris pustulosis relapsed in two patients after three and six infusions, respectively; there was slight improvement after discontinuation of anti-TNF-alpha drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab seems to be a very effective therapy for osteoarticular complaints of SAPHO syndrome. Cutaneous involvement responded less favourably, palmoplantaris pustulosis relapse being a possible complication.     

Major reduction in spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after treatment with infliximab: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled magnetic resonance imaging study

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) in reducing the signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) coincide with a reduction in spinal inflammation as detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Pre- and postgadolinium T1 and STIR MR images of the spine were acquired at baseline and at week 24 in patients with AS who participated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned at an 8:3 ratio to receive infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every 6 weeks thereafter. MR images were obtained and evaluated independently by 2 readers who were blinded to the treatment allocation and time sequence of the images. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients in the infliximab group and 72 patients in the placebo group had evaluable images at baseline and week 24. About 80% of the patients had at least 1 active spinal lesion at baseline, as assessed by MRI. The improvement in the MRI Activity Score after 6 months was significantly greater in the patients who received infliximab (mean 5.02, median 2.72) than in those who received placebo (mean 0.60, median 0.0) (P < 0.001). Almost complete resolution of spinal inflammation was seen in most patients who received infliximab, irrespective of baseline activity. CONCLUSION: Patients with AS who received infliximab therapy showed a decrease in spinal inflammation as detected by MRI, whereas those who received placebo showed persistent inflammatory spondylitis.     

The effects of TNF alpha inhibition on plasma fibrinolytic balance in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatical disorders

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies support an inflammatory basis for atherosclerosis. Patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatical disorders are at increased risk for cardiovascular events, and this can be partially attributed to the inhibition of fibrinolytic system. TNF a inhibitors such as infliximab are shown to retard the progression of inflammatory arthritides. In this study, we investigated the effects of infliximab on plasma fibrinolytic parameters. METHODS: Thirteen patients (7 female, 6 male; mean age: 44 +/- 11 years) with a clinical indication for infliximab (rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 8), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (n = 5)) were selected. Plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) antigens (Ag) and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were measured during low salt intake at baseline. All patients received infliximab (Remicaide, i.v. infusion, 3 mg/kg). Plasma PAI-1 Ag, t-PA Ag and hs-CRP were measured during low salt intake at the end of 2 weeks. All samples were collected at 9 AM. Antigen levels were determined using a 2-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Patients experienced significant improvement in disease related activity scores after infliximab treatment. DAS score (for rheumatoid arthritis) and BASDAI index (for ankylosing spondylitis) decreased significantly after treatment (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04 respectively). Infliximab significantly reduced the marker of inflammation (hs-CRP) (8.3 +/- 3.9 vs. 4 +/- 4.1 mg/L, p < 0.01). Plasma PAI-1 antigen (64.7 +/- 26.9 vs. 40 +/- 31.1 ng/ml, p = 0.03) and PAI-1/t-PA ratio (10.8 +/- 5.9 vs. 6.6 +/- 3.8, p = 0.02) were significantly lower after the treatment. In contrast, plasma t-PA levels were unchanged (9.4 +/- 4.4 vs. 9.0 +/- 4.3 ng/ml, p = 0.73). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that TNF alpha inhibition with infliximab decreases PAI-1 Ag level and PAI-1/t-PA ratio, and hence activates fibrinolytic system in patients with chronic inflammatory disorders.