Adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer: the next step forward

Adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer includes chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy. It is advocated in patients who are at significant risk of developing recurrence. We review recent advances in adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer. Although colorectal cancer is often considered as a single entity, it is being increasingly recognised that colon and rectal cancers are distinct disease groups and separate therapeutic strategies should be considered for each. In colonic cancer, 5-fluorouracil is used, with or without other agents. Both preoperative radiotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy have been used in rectal cancer. The development of oral chemotherapeutic agents has been a significant step in the management of colorectal cancer, while newer agents have been introduced with good results. Targeting the immune response and genetic manipulations are being developed as innovative management strategies. Although adjuvant therapy has improved outcome in colorectal cancer, stress should be laid on identifying patients who need adjuvant therapy, permitting individualisation of treatment strategy. Apart from including survival and local recurrence as outcome measures, new therapeutic approaches should be assessed in terms of quality of life of the patient.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a systemic illness. More than half of those patients who present with stage I-IIIA disease and are resected will experience distant relapse. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has been evaluated in several randomized trials but the results of these trials have been inconclusive with increased survival reported in few trials. In resectable stage IIIA NSCLC the findings of three randomized trials have indicated that the survival of these patients is better with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgical resection than with resection alone. Phase II trials using preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy have been carried out with encouraging results. The majority of patients with stage IIIA NSCLC require multimodality therapy if they are to achieve a 5-year survival. Combined modality treatment in locally advanced NSCLC continues to evolve and is a subject of ongoing research. One focus for present research is to integrate new active agents into the neoadjuvant setting. Another challenge is to find better treatment approaches in earlier stages of disease. Some data suggest that induction chemotherapy in stage I-II is feasible, does not appear to compromise surgery and yields high response rates. A further aim is to use molecular biological markers of malignancy to identify patients at highest risk of metastatic relapse.     

The role of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Patients with pancreatic cancer have a very poor outlook. There have been major advances in the standard surgical treatment of this disease, resulting in decreased post-operative mortality and morbidity. The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been developed to increase long-term patient survival following potentially curative resection. The standard chemotherapeutic agent is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), although newer cytotoxic agents are in clinical trials for advanced cancer. Initial studies of adjuvant therapy have been based on small numbers of patients, but recently two large European randomised controlled trials of adjuvant therapy (EORTC and ESPAC-1) have been completed. These suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy has a significant survival advantage over resection alone but chemoradiotherapy does not. Promising new agents are being developed and tested mainly in clinical trials of advanced pancreatic cancer. The results of large-scale randomised controlled trials to assess adjuvant therapies for pancreatic cancer demonstrate the great surgical and oncological progress that has been made over the past decade.     

The role of induction therapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among men and women in the US. Surgical resection is potentially curative; however, even after complete resection many patients experience systemic recurrence and subsequently die of their disease. As a means of reducing the chances of recurrence there has been significant interest in combining chemotherapy with surgical resection. Recently, several large phase III clinical trials have demonstrated a significant survival benefit with adjuvant or postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Use of preoperative or induction chemotherapy has also been an area of active investigation; however, the trials that have demonstrated a survival benefit were small in size, and there has not been widespread acceptance of this treatment approach. The trials of induction chemoradiotherapy have generally been performed in patients with locally advanced disease, frequently in patients with involvement of the level 2 mediastinal lymph nodes (N2). The results of the recent US Intergroup trial, 0139, which compared induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection versus nonsurgical therapy with chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable stage IIIA-N2 disease, revealed equivalent overall survival between the two treatment approaches. The results of an unplanned subset analysis of patients who were treated with lobectomy in the surgical arm have generated significant interest and debate. When the strategy of induction therapy is used, pathological clearance of the mediastinal lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor for overall survival. Current investigations are attempting to determine the optimal method of assessing this critical prognostic factor. The toxicity, efficacy and proper selection of patients for induction therapy, particularly induction chemoradiotherapy, will be assessed in ongoing and future clinical trials.     

Targeted therapy of breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent tumor of women. The development of effective adjuvant therapy based on postoperative administration of short-term chemotherapy (4-6 months) or long-term hormone therapy (5 years) or both, significantly improved survival of patients. However, therapy of adjuvant/metastatic disease is still palliative with a very low probability to induce complete remission and definitive cure of disease. The relevant efforts of basic research to identify the key and selective molecular alterations, which sustain breast cancer growth and progression allowed the possibility to develop specific molecular target treatments. Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to HER-2, is the first molecular targeting agent approved for therapy of metastatic breast cancer, capable to significantly improve clinical outcome in combination with cytotoxic therapy. Recent preliminary data from randomized, prospective, clinical trials suggest that trastuzumab decreases the risk of early recurrence by 50% in patients with HER-2-positive disease. Other novel targeted treatments are in clinical evaluation, including antiangiogenic compounds (Bevacizumab, sunitinib, vatalanib, and others) and bi-functional drugs such as lapatinib (anti Her-2 and EGFR agent) showing promising activity. This review provides an updated overview of the status of development of targeted therapy in breast cancer, as well as the challenges related to the rational use of molecular targeting agents.     

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: an overview and review of recent clinical trials

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is long established as part of the multi-modality management of locally advanced breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer, leading to significantly improved outcome. Numerous recent studies have compared the use of anthracycline-based NAC with adjuvant chemotherapy in earlier-stage disease, and have shown equivalent disease-free and overall survival rates with increased breast conservation rates. These studies have also shown that a pathological complete response after NAC is associated with improved long-term outcome. More recently, the taxanes have been introduced into clinical trials of NAC with increased overall and pCR rates. However, there is no evidence that the addition of taxanes to neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improves long-term disease free survival or overall survival. This paper reviews these trials, as well as trials of dose-dense and trastuzumab-containing NAC regimens. The review discusses the potential for NAC to replace prolonged adjuvant trials in the assessment of new therapeutic agents (using pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term outcome), to be used as an in vivo chemosensitivity assay to guide further treatment, and to identify molecular markers that correlate with tumour sensitivity or resistance to chemotherapeutic agents so that the treatment of patients can be individualised.     

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: an overview and review of recent clinical trials

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is long established as part of the multi-modality management of locally advanced breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer, leading to significantly improved outcome. Numerous recent studies have compared the use of anthracycline-based NAC with adjuvant chemotherapy in earlier-stage disease, and have shown equivalent disease-free and overall survival rates with increased breast conservation rates. These studies have also shown that a pathological complete response after NAC is associated with improved long-term outcome. More recently, the taxanes have been introduced into clinical trials of NAC with increased overall and pCR rates. However, there is no evidence that the addition of taxanes to neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improves long-term disease free survival or overall survival. This paper reviews these trials, as well as trials of dose-dense and trastuzumab-containing NAC regimens. The review discusses the potential for NAC to replace prolonged adjuvant trials in the assessment of new therapeutic agents (using pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term outcome), to be used as an in vivo chemosensitivity assay to guide further treatment, and to identify molecular markers that correlate with tumour sensitivity or resistance to chemotherapeutic agents so that the treatment of patients can be individualised.     

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a critical appraisal

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas carries a grim prognosis. Surgery is currently the only curative option, but even the few patients undergoing complete resection of early localised disease run a high risk for relapse and death. Although numerous clinical trials have been conducted during the past 20 years to find an effective adjuvant treatment, thus far no general consensus on the most appropriate regimen has been reached. In a small randomised study performed in the 1980s by the GITSG (Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group), encouraging results were obtained with fluorouracil (5-FU)-based split-course chemoradiotherapy, but these findings were not confirmed in a randomised study initiated some years later by the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer). More recently, the ESPAC (European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer)-1 trial even indicated a detrimental effect of chemoradiotherapy, while chemotherapy with 5-FU was shown to have a significant positive impact on long-term survival. However, this latter finding is in contrast to earlier studies of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU combinations from Norway and Japan that did not suggest a prolonged beneficial effect of 5-FU on survival. Thus, the results for adjuvant regimens based on systemic 5-FU with or without external radiotherapy are conflicting. Clinical experience with intraoperative radiotherapy or regionally targeted chemotherapy to prevent local relapse, though encouraging, is still preliminary. More recently, gemcitabine, which is the most effective single agent in advanced pancreatic cancer, has also been evaluated in the adjuvant setting. The RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group)-9704 trial demonstrated that gemcitabine is superior to 5-FU as an addition to chemoradiotherapy, but the results did not allow conclusions about the value of radiation in the combined modality approach. The Charité Onkologie CONKO-001 is a randomised trial from Germany and Austria that compared adjuvant gemcitabine with observation alone. Gemcitabine was very well tolerated and almost doubled median disease-free survival and overall survival rate at 5 years, although the advantage in overall survival failed to reach statistical significance. In summary, the available data from randomised clinical trials of adjuvant therapy suggest that (i) chemoradiotherapy has no obvious advantage compared with chemotherapy alone; and (ii) chemotherapy with gemcitabine is effective and probably offers the best benefit-risk ratio of all currently available adjuvant treatment options.     

Emerging drugs in pancreatic cancer

Improving survival in patients with pancreatic cancer remains a formidable challenge. For the few patients with localised stages of the disease, intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies remain non-validated and the survival benefit conferred by 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid adjuvant chemotherapy over radical surgery alone is still a matter of debate. Gemcitabine has recently emerged as the standard single agent in advanced stages of the disease and pharmacokinetic refinements such as the use of a fixed-dose infusion rate may further improve still rather modest result figures. At present, most efforts deal with the development of more effective doublet or triplet therapies, combining gemcitabine with either conventional cytotoxic drugs--the most promising being oxaliplatin--or more innovative, targeted therapeutic agents. Among these agents, matrix metalloprotease inhibitors and farnesyltransferase inhibitors have already undergone Phase III trials, alone or in combination with gemcitabine, with rather disappointing results. However, preclinical and Phase I and II studies of cyclooxygenase-2 or lipoxygenase inhibitors, various immunotherapeutic approaches and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies against growth factors or their receptors are encouraging and may provide some hope for patients with pancreatic cancer.     

Pharmacotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the seventh and oesophageal cancer the ninth most common cancer in the UK, and >50% of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The incidence of oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional tumours is increasing, making these important disease entities to understand and research. Despite improvements in surgical and peri-operative supportive care, 3-year overall survival with surgery alone for resectable disease is still poor. Outcomes in localised oesophageal cancer are improved with pre-operative chemotherapy, and in gastric cancer with peri-operative treatment or post-operative chemoradiotherapy. Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma can be treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy as an alternative to surgery. While survival in patients presenting with metastatic disease is improved with the addition of systemic chemotherapy, median survival remains <1 year. Patients who are otherwise fit can be offered chemotherapy and this is superior to best supportive care. Regimens including a platinum and an anthracycline agent are favoured by the results of randomised trials. No standard second-line therapy has emerged. New research into taxanes has shown promising anti-cancer activity, and novel areas of investigation include incorporation of agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor into standard regimens. This review focuses on the clinical trial evidence that dictates the optimal management of localised and advanced oesophagogastric cancer, focusing on pharmacotherapy. We examine areas of current research and highlight future therapeutic directions.     

Locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer: current management and new treatment developments

The management of gastric cancer remains a challenge. In recent years, the most important advances have been achieved in the adjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced disease, where significant survival benefits have been demonstrated for both perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These findings have changed the standard of care for patients with resectable disease. In the setting of metastatic gastric cancer, the development of new cytotoxic regimens must consider the balance between efficacy and toxicity in patients whose overall prognosis is poor. Major advances in recent years include the development of orally administered fluoropyrimidine analogues, which can be used in place of intravenous fluorouracil, and the addition of newer agents such as oxaliplatin and docetaxel, which have demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced disease. Targeted therapies have had a major impact on the management of certain malignancies, and while their evaluation in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer remains early, it is likely that these agents will continue to be developed and studied in combination with chemotherapy. This article reviews recent advances in the use of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Targeted therapies, their mechanisms of action and emerging data supporting their use in gastric cancer are also discussed. The two randomized phase III trials supporting adjuvant therapy for locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer are discussed in detail, together with strategies for future trials in this area. Overall, there remains optimism that further incremental gains will be achieved with future studies combining chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapies, both in the adjuvant and metastatic disease settings.     

Meta-analysis: evaluation of adjuvant therapy after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate adjuvant modalities after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. METHODS: In a first step, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Sensitivity analyses after inclusion of non-randomized controlled trials were performed. Four therapeutic modalities were evaluated: pre-operative transarterial chemotherapy, post-operative transarterial chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and a combination of systemic and transarterial chemotherapy. RESULTS: Only post-operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival significantly at 2 years [difference, 22.8%; confidence interval (CI), 8.6-36.9%; P = 0.002] and 3 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2-47.1%; P = 0.005), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 28.8%; CI, 16.7-40.8%; P < 0.001), 2 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2-47.1%; P = 0.005) and 3 years (difference, 28%; CI, 8.2-47.9%; P = 0.006). In a sensitivity analysis after inclusion of non-randomized controlled trials, post-operative transarterial chemotherapy still improved survival at 1 year (difference, 9.6%; CI, 0.8-18.3%; P = 0.03), 2 years (difference, 13.5%; CI, 0.9-26%, P = 0.04) and 3 years (difference, 18%; CI, 7-28.9%; P < 0.001), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 20.3%; CI, 7.7-33%; P = 0.002), 2 years (difference, 35%; CI, 21.4-46.3%; P < 0.001) and 3 years (difference, 34.5%; CI, 18.7-50.3%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Post-operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival and decreased the cumulative probability of no recurrence. New randomized controlled trials evaluating this modality are required.     

Improving outcomes in advanced malignant melanoma: update on systemic therapy

Malignant melanoma continues to increase in incidence throughout the developed world. Surgery remains the cornerstone of curative treatment and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy has provoked much debate. Metastatic disease is incurable in most patients. While combination chemotherapy or biochemotherapy may be considered in certain circumstances, it is now clear that single-agent chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for the majority of patients.A number of new agents and novel approaches are under evaluation and show promise. The pro-apoptotic agent oblimersen has shown improved progression-free survival and response rate, although not overall survival, when combined with dacarbazine compared with dacarbazine alone. The BRaf inhibitor sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) has produced encouraging results when administered with chemotherapy and is now being assessed in randomised studies. Thalidomide in combination with chemotherapy is well tolerated and shows a trend towards increased clinical efficacy compared with chemotherapy alone. Other anti-angiogenic drugs, such as bevacizumab, are being investigated in trials. Results with tumour vaccines have been mixed and several large trials are ongoing.This paper discusses recent pivotal studies and promising new agents in systemic therapy for advanced malignant melanoma.     

Complete estrogen blockade for the treatment of metastatic and early stage breast cancer

Complete estrogen blockade has long been sought as a more effective means of controlling breast cancer compared with single agent endocrine therapy. This approach may be accomplished through the use of agents which reduce estrogen production combined with agents that prevent the activity of estrogen at the cellular level. For prostate cancer, another hormonally responsive malignancy, this approach has not been successful at improving survival compared with that achieved with single agent therapy. Preclinical information is contradictory for many promising combinations and may not reflect the true nature of in vivo interaction between agents. For premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer, the combination of a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and tamoxifen is clearly effective, but whether the combination is more effective than either single agent is still controversial. Similar response rates and overall survival were reported with goserelin or goserelin plus tamoxifen by Jonat et al. in 1 randomised, prospective study, but the addition of tamoxifen improved time to progression. A second trial comparing buserelin plus tamoxifen with either single agent reported superior efficacy in terms of response rates, disease-free survival and overall survival with combination therapy. A meta-analysis of 4 randomised trials making similar comparisons, demonstrated significant improvement in median overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, and duration of response with the combination of a LHRH agonist (goserelin or buserelin) and tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer patients with metastatic disease. For postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, the addition of an aromatase inhibitor to tamoxifen has yet to be prospectively compared to single agent therapy. Use of endocrine combinations in the treatment of early stage breast cancer is under investigation. Preliminary results of some of the ongoing adjuvant therapy trials indicate that the combination of a LHRH agonist and tamoxifen may have similar efficacy to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy in premenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive tumour. Addition of LHRH agonist therapy in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumour who had maintained the ovarian function following chemotherapy [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (adriamycin), fluorouracil, and tamoxifen], also led to a reduction in the risk of recurrence. These studies have identified a sub-population of patients who may benefit from the addition of combination endocrine therapy. Overall, the issue is quite complex and the data from many ongoing trials are still awaited with anticipation to further delineate the role of complete estrogen deprivation in this disease.     

Risk-adapted adjuvant chemotherapy after concomitant fluoropyrimidine-radiotherapy neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable cT3-4 or N+ rectal cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer is not well defined.After neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery, at least a short period of treatment with 5-fluorouracil is recommended, and some investigators claim a more aggressive approach, in particular, for those patients with a high risk of systemic relapse. Nevertheless, there are few studies about adjuvant combination therapy tolerance and efficacy, and no randomized trials have been conducted comparing fluoropyrimidines versus combination therapy such as folinic acid plus 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin(FOLFOX), considered the standard of care in stage IIIcolon cancer. We present an institutional series of risk adapted adjuvant therapy. Sixty evaluable patients who had received treatment with neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine radiotherapy and surgery now received adjuvant fluoropyrimidines in the case of pT0-2N0 or oxaliplatin based combination in the case of pT3-4 or N+ . Overall, 33 patients experienced downstaging to pT2-0N0 (55%) and27 patients were restaged as pT3-4 or N+ (45%) after surgery. Local recurrence rate was 5% (three patients), one local and one local plus systemic in the adjuvant single agent group and one local plus systemic in the adjuvant FOLFOX group. Systemic relapse occurred in 14 patients(23.3%), five (15%) in the single-agent group and nine(33.3%) in the FOLFOX group. Disease-free survival at 3 years for patients in the good prognostic group(pT0-2N0) and poor prognostic group (pT3-4 or N+ ) were 78.7 and 62.2%, respectively. Severe diarrhoea was more frequent with fluoropyrimidines and neutropenia, mucositis and peripheral neuropathy were more common with FOLFOX. There were no toxic deaths. A risk-adapted adjuvant therapeutic decision is feasible with an acceptable safety profile even with the use of oxaliplatin based combinations. Three-year disease-free survival compares favourably with historical controls, especially in those patients with high risk factors for relapse.Phase III controlled trials are needed.     

Pancreatic cancer: a review of recent advances

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Despite the advances of the molecular pathogenesis, pancreatic cancer remains a major unsolved health problem. Overall, the 5-year survival rate is < 5% and only approximately 20% of the 10% of patients with resectable disease survive 5 years. Recently, the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 1 trial demonstrated substantially increased survival from adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid and preliminary data showed prolonged disease-free survival from adjuvant gemcitabine. Current palliative therapeutic approaches mostly focused on evaluating chemotherapy regimens in which gemcitabine is combined with a second cytotoxic agent. Recently, large randomised trials of combinations of gemcitabine with either capecitabine or with erlotinib demonstrated prolonged survival and 1-year survival rates of approximately 25%. The advance of molecular biology has led to the elucidation of molecular events that are important for pancreatic carcinogenesis and has provided a foundation for the development of novel chemotherapeutic and biological agents that appear to be promising and are likely to play a future role in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE The etiology, diagnosis, staging, and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are reviewed, with an emphasis on clinical trials of newer approaches to first-line, second-line, and adjuvant chemotherapy. SUMMARY: In the past decade, more effective chemotherapy regimens have been developed for patients with MPM, a rapidly progressing disease linked to a history of asbestos exposure in about 70% of cases. Patients with MPM often require multimodal treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant or neoadjuvant (presurgical) chemotherapy. The current standard of first-line chemotherapy for MPM is cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with pemetrexed, an antifolate compound that has been shown to increase the cytotoxic effects of platinum-based drugs. In Phase II and III clinical trials, combination therapy with pemetrexed and either cisplatin or carboplatin yielded some of the highest rates of tumor response (21-41%) and overall survival (about 12-14 months) reported to date. Dual-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin plus gemcitabine or pemetrexed) followed by radical surgery with or without radiotherapy has been reported to yield median survival of up to 23-29 months in small clinical trials, but larger randomized controlled studies are needed to better define the role of neoadjuvant therapy in MPM management. Other chemotherapeutic agents that have been used against MPM, with variable results, include gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxanes, anthracyclines, and molecular-targeted agents. CONCLUSION: Treatment approaches for MPM include surgery, radiation, and systemic chemotherapy. MPM carries a poor prognosis, but recent studies of pemetrexed and platinum analogue combination therapies have demonstrated improved response rates over other treatments.     

Treatment of non-localised, non-metastatic rectal cancer

The standard treatment for rectal cancer is surgical removal of the rectum and mesorectum. Is the prognosis for non-metastatic rectal cancer that extends beyond the bowel wall improved by adding radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy to surgery? To answer this question, we conducted a review of the literature using the standard Prescrire methodology. Randomised trials conducted before optimal surgery was developed showed that, compared with surgery alone, postoperative radiotherapy reduced the risk of local recurrence and possibly increased overall survival. In the only randomised trial in which the mesorectum was systematically removed, preoperative radiotherapy had no impact on overall survival but reduced the risk of local recurrence (5% at 10 years, versus 11% without radiation therapy).This result was statistically significant in patients with lymph node involvement. Radiotherapy for rectal cancer carries a risk of faecal incontinence (about 50% of patients), small bowel occlusion, and secondary cancers (about 1 in 15 patients). In patients who receive neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy before surgery, postoperative chemotherapy based on fluorouracil or the tegafur + uracil combination increases overall survival by about 5% at 5 years, in absolute numbers, but carries a risk of serious adverse effects, including haematological and gastrointestinal disorders. Eight randomised trials suggest that the beneficial effects of post-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy persist and are additive. However, the same is true for adverse effects. In four randomised trials, adding chemotherapy to preoperative radiotherapy roughly halved the risk of local recurrence. In three randomised trials, preoperative chemoradiotherapy appeared to be slightly more effective than postoperative chemoradiotherapy in terms of recurrence, and to carry a similar or lower risk of serious adverse effects, without improving overall survival. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy carries a risk of unnecessarily exposing between 8% and 18% of patients to adverse effects, as their tumour is found to be less extensive than initially thought. There is no firm evidence that postoperative chemotherapy is beneficial after preoperative radiotherapy. Preoperative treatments do not prevent removal of the anal sphincter. The probable benefits of adjuvant therapies in surgical patients must be weighed, on a case by case basis, against the potential risk of serious adverse effects and complications.     

Pancreatic cancer: a review of recent advances

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Despite the advances of the molecular pathogenesis, pancreatic cancer remains a major unsolved health problem. Overall, the 5-year survival rate is < 5% and only ～ 20% of the 10% of patients with resectable disease survive 5 years. Recently, the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 1 trial demonstrated substantially increased survival from adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil–folinic acid and preliminary data showed prolonged disease-free survival from adjuvant gemcitabine. Current palliative therapeutic approaches mostly focused on evaluating chemotherapy regimens in which gemcitabine is combined with a second cytotoxic agent. Recently, large randomised trials of combinations of gemcitabine with either capecitabine or with erlotinib demonstrated prolonged survival and 1-year survival rates of ～ 25%. The advance of molecular biology has led to the elucidation of molecular events that are important for pancreatic carcinogenesis and has provided a foundation for the development of novel chemotherapeutic and biological agents that appear to be promising and are likely to play a future role in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy preceding cystectomy for bladder cancer

Background: Occult micrometastasis at the time of radical cystectomy leads predominantly to distant failures in patients with locally advanced, muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Objectives: Data supporting neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced bladder cancer are reviewed. Results: Studies evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy have been limited by inadequate statistical power. However, randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a survival benefit for neoadjvuant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Trials employing neoadjuvant therapy are particularly valuable in the development of novel systemic therapy regimens, since pathological complete remission appears to be a powerful prognostic factor for long-term survival. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a standard for the therapy of locally advanced bladder cancer, and the neoadjuvant paradigm may assist in accelerating novel agent development.