Effects of hydrochlorothiazide and diltiazem on reflex vasoconstriction in hypertension

The purpose of our study was to determine the effects of treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (n = 10) or diltiazem (n = 8) on reflex humoral, hemodynamic, and vascular responses to graded lower body negative pressure in subjects with mild to moderate hypertension (supine diastolic pressure, 95-114 mm Hg). All subjects received placebo for 2 to 4 weeks followed by either hydrochlorothiazide (25-50 mg b.i.d.) or diltiazem (120-180 mg b.i.d.) to achieve a reduction in supine diastolic pressure of 10 mm Hg or more and a final pressure below 90 mm Hg. Mean arterial pressure, forearm vascular resistance, plasma norepinephrine, and renin responses to graded lower body negative pressure (-10, -20, -40 mm Hg) and head-up tilt were examined before and after 12 weeks of treatment with either drug. Pretreatment basal values of mean arterial pressure (114 +/- 2 vs 117 +/- 2 mm Hg), forearm vascular resistance (29 +/- 3 vs 35 +/- 7 units), and plasma renin activity (0.7 +/- 0.2 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2 ng angiotensin I/ml/hr) were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant differences in basal plasma norepinephrine or in the increases of norepinephrine in response to lower body negative pressure before and after treatment in either group. Forearm vascular resistance responses to lower body negative pressure were virtually abolished in the diltiazem-treated group but not in the hydrochlorothiazide-treated group despite similar levels of mean arterial pressure and basal forearm vascular resistance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of hydrochlorothiazide and sustained-release diltiazem for mild-to-moderate systemic hypertension

The safety and efficacy of sustained-release diltiazem, 120 to 180 mg twice daily, was compared with those of hydrochlorothiazide, 25 to 50 mg twice daily, in 207 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure [BP] 95 to 114 mm Hg) using a baseline, placebo, parallel-design study protocol. All patients received placebo for 2 to 4 weeks, followed by either study drug during the double-blind phase, titrated over 8 weeks to achieve a goal of supine diastolic BP reduction of at least 10 mm Hg and/or a diastolic BP of less than 90 mm Hg. Patients not achieving the treatment goal with either drug alone received the other drug in combination. Both drugs produced significant decreases in supine and upright BP throughout the 26-week study. The magnitude of decrease in mean supine diastolic BP was similar for both drugs as monotherapy at week 14 (-11.4 and -12.1 mm Hg, respectively). Hydrochlorothiazide produced significantly greater reductions at week 14 in mean supine systolic BP than sustained-release diltiazem (-19.5 and -12.7 mm Hg, respectively). The difference in mean supine diastolic BP reduction with the 2 drugs diminished when hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg/day) was compared with sustained-release diltiazem. The BP effects were sustained for 6 months with both drugs. The 2 drugs appeared to lower BP more in patients older than 60 years and more in black than in white patients. The combination of the 2 drugs decreased supine diastolic BP to goal levels in about 56% of the patients not achieving goal with either drug alone. Adverse effects were minimal with either drug alone and in combination, except for hypokalemia, which increased with thiazide alone and in combination.     

Comparative effects of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide in blacks with systemic hypertension

The blood pressure-lowering effects of a calcium-entry blocker, diltiazem (240 or 360 mg/day), and a thiazide diuretic, hydrochlorothiazide (50 or 100 mg/day), were studied in 20 black hypertensive patients. Supine blood pressure decreases of -34/-18 mm Hg for diltiazem and -29/-21 mm Hg for hydrochlorothiazide were noted after 14 weeks of therapy. Differences between drugs were not significant. Blood pressures were normalized in all 4 of the monotherapy nonresponders when the 2 drugs were combined. Significant adverse effects were not noted. These data suggest that diltiazem is an effective antihypertensive agent in black patients. As monotherapy, its blood pressure-lowering effect is equivalent to hydrochlorothiazide.     

Crossover comparison of atenolol, enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide and isradipine for isolated systolic systemic hypertension.

The benefit of antihypertensive therapy in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with isolated systolic hypertension has now been established by the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. However, there is little information about the relative effectiveness of different drug regimens in this condition. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of 50 mg of atenolol, 10 mg of enalapril, 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide and 2.5 mg of isradipine in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension. After a 3-week placebo run-in phase, 24 subjects were randomized into a 4-period double-blind crossover study by use of an orthogonal latin square design. Treatment periods were of 6 weeks' duration with titration to a higher dose after 4 weeks in those not reaching goal blood pressure (BP). Each active treatment was followed by a 3-week placebo washout. Casual clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BP (Accutracker II) were measured at the end of each treatment phase. Routine biochemistry was also performed after the placebo run-in, at the end of each active treatment phase, and after the placebo run-out. Of the 24 subjects entered (mean age 72.3 years, 38% men) 20 completed the whole study. Mean +/- standard deviation of supine clinic and daytime ambulatory BP on entry were 181/79 +/- 21/9 mm Hg and 165/82 +/- 23/15 mm Hg, respectively. All drugs reduced mean casual and ambulatory BP significantly relative to placebo but only hydrochlorothiazide and enalapril produced a consistent hypotensive effect throughout the entire 24-hour period. Isradipine and enalapril exhibited a relatively greater effect on reducing systolic BP than either hydrochlorothiazide or atenolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of enalapril on lymphocyte sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium levels in patients with severe congestive heart failure

Fifteen patients (median age 73 years) with severe congestive heart failure were treated with Enalapril for a total of 12 weeks with a significant improvement in their right atrial pressures and in their functional state. Renal function, serum potassium, magnesium and calcium levels were unchanged. Lymphocyte sodium, potassium and calcium levels were generally lower than control values throughout the study but these differences were only statistically significant early in the study. Lymphocyte magnesium levels were unchanged. These findings are in contrast to those previously reported in the literature for such patients treated with conventional diuretics.     

Diuretics versus calcium-channel blockers in systemic hypertension: a preliminary multicenter experience with hydrochlorothiazide and sustained-release diltiazem

The safety and efficacy of sustained-release diltiazem 120 to 180 mg, 2 times a day, were compared with hydrochlorothiazide 25 to 50 mg, 2 times a day, and the combination of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide in 56 patients with mild to moderate hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 114 mm Hg) using a placebo-controlled, parallel-design protocol. Data from an additional 21 patients were evaluated for safety only. The data reported herein represent the preliminary experience from a larger 200-patient multicenter study. All patients received placebo for 4 weeks, followed by either hydrochlorothiazide or diltiazem titrated to achieve a diastolic blood pressure reduction of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg to reach a goal supine diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg. Patients not achieving the treatment goal received hydrochlorothiazide plus diltiazem. At week 14, on maintenance monotherapy, diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide produced comparable reductions in blood pressure from placebo baseline (160.3 +/- 24.3/101.7 +/- 5.5 to 145.2 +/- 24.1/89.8 +/- 7.4 mm Hg with diltiazem, 156.0 +/- 15.6/103.7 +/- 4.7 to 134.1 +/- 12.5/89.2 +/- 9.5 mm Hg with hydrochlorothiazide, p less than 0.001 for both). Diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide achieved goal blood pressure in 42% and 45% of patients, respectively. The effects in responders were sustained for 6 months. In patients who did not achieve the treatment goal, 63% responded to diltiazem plus hydrochlorothiazide.No clinically significant postural hypotension was observed on any regimen. Heart rate was slightly lower with diltiazem than with hydrochlorothiazide. Adverse effects were minimal with diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide and diltiazem plus hydrochlorothiazide but more hypokalemia occurred with hydrochlorothiazide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide for treatment of patients 60 years of age or older with systemic hypertension

This randomized, double-blind, parallel design trial compared the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with either sustained-release diltiazem or hydrochlorothiazide in 61 men greater than or equal to 60 years of age with a diastolic blood pressure (BP) between 94 and 104 mm Hg. BP, heart rate, laboratory blood and urine tests, left ventricular wall thickness and mass index (as estimated by M-mode echocardiography) and rate and type of ventricular premature complexes (via ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring) were determined before, during and after drug treatment. Both drugs produced highly significant (p less than 0.001) decreases in supine and upright systolic and diastolic BP. The mean dosages of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide used were 260 and 52 mg/day, respectively; at these dosages, 80% of diltiazem-treated versus 71% of hydrochlorothiazide-treated patients achieved goal reduction in BP (supine diastolic BP reduction of greater than 10 mm Hg and to less than 90 mm Hg). Both drugs were well tolerated, although hydrochlorothiazide therapy was associated with multiple biochemical abnormalities not seen with diltiazem. Neither drug affected left ventricular mass index or the rate of ventricular ectopic activity. Diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide are both effective and safe agents when used as monotherapy in older patients with systemic hypertension unaccompanied by other clinically significant cardiovascular disease.     

Comparative study of enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide and their combination in the treatment of essential hypertension

This was a randomized double-blind, multiclinic, parallel, three treatments group study to compare the safety and efficacy of a fixed-ratio combination of enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide (E/HCTZ: 20/12.5-40/25 N = 46) to enalapril (E = 20-40 mg, N = 49) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ: 12.5-25 mg, N = 51) once daily, in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension (100 less than or equal to supine diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 120 mmHg). A significant decrease of systolic and diastolic blood pressure was shown in the 3 subgroups of patients. The decrease of blood pressure was significantly greater in the E/HCTZ subgroup. After 8 weeks of treatment, the E/HCTZ group had the greatest proportion of normotensive patients (65.9 p. cent, DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg) and of responders (81.8 p. cent, diastolic blood pressure decrease greater than 10 mmHg). The treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to clinical adverse events. The study results document the well-known hyperuricemic effect of diuretics and also indicate that the combination of enalapril and HCTZ ameliorates this effects. In this study plasma potassium was slightly but not significantly decreased by HCTZ. The combination of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide did not alter this parameter. The results support the conclusion that in the treatment of moderate to severe hypertension, the combination enalapril/HCTZ 20/12.5 to 40/25 mg, taken once daily, is more effective than either its components used alone. This combination is well tolerated, probably due to an adequate enalapril/HCTZ dosage ratio.     

Comparison of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide for systemic hypertension

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy with associated LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction is frequently found in patients with systemic hypertension, and is multifactorial in origin. Although a reduction in blood pressure (BP) often results in regression of hypertrophy, the pharmacologic profiles of the antihypertensive agents used may determine the probability of such regression despite similar levels of BP reduction. Thiazide diuretic drugs may actually result in increased LV hypertrophy; calcium channel antagonists may cause regression or no change. The effects of treatment with nitrendipine (20 mg/day) or hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg/day) were compared in an 8-week, double-blind study of 18 hypertensive subjects aged 50 years or older. BP was significantly reduced (p less than 0.05) by both nitrendipine (from 161 +/- 29/102 +/- 4 to 145 +/- 24/92 +/- 7 mm Hg; mean +/- standard deviation) and hydrochlorothiazide (from 162 +/- 15/105 +/- 6 to 143 +/- 20/95 +/- 7 mm Hg). Plasma norepinephrine increased in the nitrendipine group, from 202 +/- 110 to 332 +/- 220 pg/ml at 8 weeks of therapy and in the hydrochlorothiazide group, from 147 +/- 130 to 313 +/- 277. Plasma renin activity changed from 3.2 +/- 2.4 to 3.5 +/- 2.1 during nitrendipine treatment, but from 2.1 +/- 2.1 to 10.5 +/- 10.8 ng angiotensin l/ml/90 min (p less than 0.05) during treatment with hydrochlorothiazide. Left ventricular mass index did not change significantly with either therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of diltiazem on cardiovascular responses during exercise in systemic hypertension and comparison with propranolol

Sixteen patients with uncomplicated systemic hypertension were treated with placebo, diltiazem (180 mg/day) and propranolol (60 mg/day) for 1 month each. Each patient performed multistage symptom-limited treadmill exercise tests during each period of administration. There was no significant difference in maximal exercise duration between placebo, diltiazem and propranolol. Diltiazem significantly decreased both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate at rest, during submaximal exercise at the same work load and maximal exercise. Propranolol produced similar changes in systemic BP and heart rate at rest and during exercise. However, the reductions in systolic BP, heart rate and pressure-rate product with diltiazem during exercise were smaller than those with propranolol at small doses, suggesting that diltiazem in its usual therapeutic dose was almost devoid of beta-blocking activity. Thus, diltiazem may be of benefit to hypertensive patients because it reduces systemic BP even during exercise. It is particularly useful when systemic hypertension occurs in association with coronary artery disease because of its effects of coronary artery dilatation and heart rate reduction.     

Comparison and additivity of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide in systemic hypertension

Calcium channel blockers are highly effective antihypertensive agents and provide a good alternative to other medications used as initial or monotherapy. Although the calcium channel blockers act as peripheral vasodilators, they are unique among this group of drugs in lowering blood pressure in a sustained manner; several compensatory mechanisms are inhibited by virtue of either direct or indirect effects of these agents. In recent years, hypertension has generally been treated with a step-care approach, the limitations of which are now becoming apparent. Today, 4 classes of agents are effective and well tolerated as single therapy and might therefore be considered as first-line drug therapy: diuretics, beta blockers, converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers. Preliminary results from an ongoing double-blind randomized trial comparing nitrendipine (a calcium channel blocker) and hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic) in mild to moderate hypertension will be presented. Results from 63 patients showed the 2 agents to be equivalent in antihypertensive effects and in frequency of adverse reactions. Other data indicate that when nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide were combined, a further decrease in blood pressure was observed. Patient characteristics affecting drug choice and clinical situations in which calcium channel blockers can be used most effectively can now often be delineated.     

Renal and systemic effects of enalapril in chronic one-kidney hypertension

We have investigated the role of angiotensin II in the development of high blood pressure and in the maintenance of renal function during 2 weeks of one-kidney renal artery stenosis in conscious dogs. Responses to a fixed degree of inflation of a balloon cuff around the renal artery were compared in dogs with or without continuous enalapril (MK 421) treatment. In six untreated dogs, mean aortic pressure was increased by 17.1 +/- 2.0 mm Hg, due primarily to increases in total peripheral resistance with little change in cardiac output, while glomerular filtration rate, renal blood flow, renal artery pressure, and plasma renin activity were back to prestenosis levels. In seven enalapril-treated dogs mean aortic pressure was increased by 23.0 +/- 2.7 mm Hg and was not significantly different from that occurring in untreated dogs. This rise was due to increases in total peripheral resistance (10%) and cardiac output (12%). In the absence of angiotensin II, glomerular filtration rate remained low, at only 56 +/- 6% of prestenosis levels. Renal blood flow returned to normal, but the renal artery pressure remained 25% lower than control values. Thus, the main role of angiotensin II in chronic one-kidney Goldblatt hypertension does not appear to be through its pressor properties but rather through its actions in the kidney to preserve glomerular filtration. This effect on renal function persisted throughout the course of the hypertension, even when the plasma renin levels returned to normal.     

Effects of diltiazem hydrochloride on cardiovascular response, platelet aggregation and coagulating activity during exercise testing in systemic hypertension

The effects of diltiazem hydrochloride on exercise-induced changes in cardiovascular response, plasma renin activity, platelet function and blood coagulability were evaluated with multistage treadmill exercise in 20 patients who had systemic hypertension of stage 1 to 2 (World Health Organization classification). Heart rates, blood pressure, and pressure-rate product at rest, at peak exercise and in the recovery period were significantly reduced after 4 weeks of diltiazem administration, 180 mg/day. Plasma renin activity tended to increase after the medication. However, platelet adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation sensitivity, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, plasma fibrinogen concentration and antithrombin III activity did not change significantly. It is concluded that diltiazem could ameliorate the hyperresponsiveness of heart rate and BP to exercise in hypertensive patients without affecting blood coagulability.     

Effects of isradipine, a new calcium antagonist, versus hydrochlorothiazide on serum lipids and apolipoproteins in patients with systemic hypertension

The effect of isradipine versus hydrochlorothiazide on the lipid profile of 44 hypertensive patients was investigated in a double-blind, randomized, 2-center trial. Lipid profiles included total cholesterol, serum triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, HDL subclasses, (HDL2 and HDL3), low density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-1 and apolipoprotein B. Isradipine had no effect on the lipid profile in short- (4 and 10 week) or long-term (52 week) studies. Hydrochlorothiazide increased serum triglycerides in 11 of 13 patients by a mean of 8% for the group (p less than 0.05) in long-term (52 week) studies, and total cholesterol by a mean of 9 and 16%, respectively (p less than 0.01) in 2 of 13 patients, with no difference in other lipid or lipoprotein parameters in short- or long-term studies.     

Comparative efficacy of fixed dose combinations of enalapril with hydrochlorothiazide and captopril with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with high risk hypertension

Clinical effectiveness and tolerability of o.d. use of fixed dose combinations of enalapril (10 mg) with hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) (Enap H) and captopril (50 mg) with hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) (Capozide) were compared in a randomized study on 60 patients with I-II degree high and very high risk hypertension. Study duration was 6 months, number of patients in each of parallel groups -- 30. Antihypertensive activity, ability to improve arterial elasticity and T/P parameter, cost/efficacy index of enalapril (10 mg) plus hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) combination was found to be superior to those of captopril (50 mg) plus hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) combination.     

Comparison of enalapril and bendrofluazide for treatment of systemic hypertension

The antihypertensive and biochemical effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril were compared with those of the thiazide diuretic bendrofluazide. Patients with untreated mild to moderate essential hypertension were entered into a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Blood pressure (BP) decreased significantly (p less than 0.001) with either drug therapy: from 172/103 to 147/87 mm Hg (n = 18) with enalapril and from 179/104 to 165/95 mm Hg (n = 22) with bendrofluazide; thus, enalapril produced a greater reduction (p less than 0.05) than bendrofluazide. The median dose of enalapril was 20 mg/day (range 10 to 40) and that of bendrofluazide was 5 mg/day (range 2.5 to 10). Both drugs reduced serum sodium levels by small amounts. This was significant only for enalapril (decrease of 1.3 mmol/liter, p less than 0.05). Hyponatremia was not seen in any patient. Three patients were withdrawn from each treatment group due to adverse effects, although both drugs were generally well tolerated.     

Efficacy of eplerenone versus enalapril as monotherapy in systemic hypertension

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of eplerenone and enalapril in 499 patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension who were randomized to receive eplerenone or enalapril for 6 months in a 3-step titration-to-effect study. After 6 months, patients whose diastolic blood pressure (BP) was <90 mm Hg had their dosages down-titrated were followed for an additional 6 months. Diastolic BP was the primary end point. Eplerenone was as effective as enalapril in reducing both systolic BP (eplerenone, -14.5 mm Hg; enalapril, -12.7 mm Hg; p = 0.199) and diastolic BP (eplerenone, -11.2 mm Hg; enalapril, -11.3 mm Hg; p = 0.910) at 6 months. BP reductions at 12 months were also similar between groups (-16.5/-13.3 mm Hg for eplerenone, -14.8/-14.1 mm Hg for enalapril; p = 0.251 and 0.331, respectively). Withdrawal rates for adverse events (eplerenone 7.9%, enalapril 9.3% at 6 months) and treatment failures (eplerenone 23.3%, enalapril 22.8% at 6 months) were also equivalent. Approximately 2/3 of each group had normal BP with monotherapy treatment at 6 months. BP response was independent of renin levels in the eplerenone group, but not in the enalapril group. Both agents reduced albuminuria in patients who had an elevated value at baseline, with significantly greater improvement in patients treated with eplerenone versus enalapril (-61.5% vs -25.7%; p = 0.01). Both agents were similarly well tolerated, and there was no increased incidence of any sexual adverse events in the eplerenone group. Patients taking enalapril had a higher rate of cough. Both agents increased serum potassium levels, but <1% in each group reported adverse events from hyperkalemia. Eplerenone was as effective as enalapril as monotherapy in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension, was more effective in reducing albuminuria, and was well tolerated for 12 months.