Relation of angina to coronary artery disease in mitral and in aortic valve disease

Of 129 patients with either mitral or aortic valve disease angina was present in 55 (42%). It was more frequent in aortic (60%) than in mitral valve disease (33%). The standard 12-lead electrocardiogram was not helpful in distinguishing underlying occlusive coronary artery disease. Coronary arteriography demonstrated coronary artery disease in 26 patients (20%), only 2 of whom had no angina. The incidence of coronary artery disease was almost identical in both the mitral and aortic groups (22% and 17%, respectively), but the percentage of those with demonstrable coronary artery disease accompanying angina was much higher in the mitral group (67% as against 29%). Angina in mitral valve disorders is thus much more likely to be the result of disease of the coronary arteries. Coronary arteriography is mandatory in all patients in both groups who have angina. Otherwise it seems unnecessary as coronary artery disease was found in only 2 patients who did not have angina.     

Coronary angiography in the preoperative exploration of non-ischemic acquired valve diseases]

One hundred and fifty-nine patients with aortic valve disease (86 cases), mitral valve disease (58 cases) or mitral and aortic disease (15 cases) underwent a pre-operative haemodynamic study, including coronary arteriography either as a routine (age greater than 50 years) or because of chest pains. Coronary arteriography is easy to do during left heart catheterisation and nowadays carries minimal risk. In the cases of chest pains, it showed stenotic lesions of the coronary vessels in 22% of patients with aortic valve disease and in 35% of those with mitral disease. In the absence of angina, coronary arteriography showed no evidence of coronary artery disease in the cases of mitral regurgitation and of aortic valve disease. In contrast, it showed stenotic lesions in three cases of mitral stenosis. In the whole of the series, coronary artery disease proved a contra-indication to surgery in three cases, and was an indication for aorta-coronary by-pass grafting, in addition to valve surgery, in seven other cases. In the absence of angina, coronary arteriography has only a slight influence on the decision to operate. It does however give additional security, which justifies its routine use in patients over 50 years of age, particularly those with mitral valve disease.     

Angina, coronary risk factors and coronary artery disease in patients with valvular disease. A prospective study

The relationship between coronary risk factors and coronaryartery disease in patients with valvular heart disease was studiedprospectively in 387 consecutive patients undergoing routinecoronary arteriography prior to valve replacement. Coronary artery disease was as common in patients with mitralvalve disease (31.9%) as in those with aortic valve disease(26.8%) Although it occurs more frequently in patients withangina (45.7%) significant coronary artery disease is foundin 19.2% (47 of 245) of those without angina (P<0.001), suggestingthat the presence of angina alone is an unreliable indicatorof significant coronary disease. The prevalence and severityof significant coronary artery disease increases progressivelyas the number of coronary risk factors also increase (P<0.001)but the prevalence is low (3%) in patients in whom both anginaand coronary risk factors are absent. These findings suggestthat preoperative coronary arteriography might be omitted inthis latter group of patients.     

Incidence of coronary artery disease in patients with valvular heart disease.

The case notes, cardiac catheterisation data, and coronary arteriograms of 239 patients investigated for valvular heart disease during a five year period were reviewed. Angina present in 13 of 95 patients with isolated mitral valve disease, 43 of 90 patients with isolated aortic valve disease, and 18 of 54 patients with combined mitral and aortic valve disease. Significant coronary artery disease was present in 85 per cent of patients with mitral valve disease and angina, but in only 33 per cent of patients with aortic valve disease and angina. Patients with no chest pain still had a high incidence of coronary artery disease, significant coronary obstruction being present in 22 per cent with mitral valve disease, 22 per cent with aortic valve disease, and 11 per cent with combine mitral and aortic valve disease. Several possible clinical markers of coronary artery disease were examined but none was found to be of practical help. There was, however, a significant inverse relation between severity of coronary artery disease and severity of valve disease in patients with aortic valve disease. Asymptomatic coronary artery disease is not uncommon in patients with valvular heart disease and if it is policy to perform coronary artery bypass grafting in such patients, routine coronary arteriography must be part of the preoperative investigation.     

Angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic valvular disease

We studied the clinical, hemodynamic, and angiographic findings of 90 consecutive patients with significant symptomatic aortic valve disease, 40 years of age or older, to evaluate the prevalence of angina pectoris in relation to coronary artery disease and the effect upon cardiac function.The prevalence of chest pain was 66% (typical angina, 39%; atypical chest pain, 27%), and the prevalence of coronary artery disease was 39%. The prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with typical angina was 77%, in contrast to 25% in patients with atypical chest pain $\text{(}\text{P}\text{= 0.001)}$. Only two of the 35 patients (6%) with coronary artery disease were free of chest pain. Although the incidence of coronary artery disease in patients with aortic stenosis was slightly higher than in patients with aortic regurgitation or aortic stenosis-aortic regurgitation, it was not statistically significant.Patients with aortic regurgitation and coronary artery disease had significantly lower ejection fraction than patients with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. There were no significant differences between ejection fraction in patients without coronary artery disease in the different groups. Patients with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease tend to have lower mean pressure gradients than those without coronary artery disease. Patients with coronary artery disease in aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis-aortic regurgitation tend to have higher left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.This study indicates that although patients with aortic valve disease and typical angina are most likely to have associated coronary artery disease, it is not possible to predict this disorder with accuracy by means of clinical or hemodynamic findings.Since the presence or absence of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement has prognostic and therapeutic significance, we recommend that coronary arteriography be performed in all patients with significant aortic valve disease undergoing cardiac catheterization when they present with any form of chest pain, or in patients over the age of 40 years even if no chest pain is present. Coronary arteriography would also rule out anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries.     

Coronary Arteriography in Isolated Aortic and Mitral Valve Disease

Abstract: Coronary arteriography in isolated aortic and mitral valve disease. A. Saltups. Aust. N.Z. J. Med., 1982, 12 , pp. 494–497.
Coronary arteriographic findings in 200 patients with isolated aortic and mitral valve disease were reviewed to examine the relationship between obstructive (>50% diameter stenosis) coronary artery disease (CAD) and angina pectoris (AP).
Of 100 patients with aortic valve disease, 30 had CAD of whom 20 gave a history of AP. Thirty-two of 52 patients (61%) with AP did not have CAD and 10 of 48 (21%) had CAD without AP. CAD was evenly distributed among patients with aortic stenosis, incompetence and mixed aortic valve disease.
CAD was found in 23 of 100 patients with mitral valve disease. Sixteen of 32 patients with mitral incompetence had CAD of whom four had AP. Seven of 68 patients with mitral stenosis or mixed mitral valve disease had CAD. AP was noted by four of these seven patients but by none of the 61 with normal coronary arteriograms (p <0.0001). Asymptomatic CAD was more common among patients with mitral incompetence (12/28 vs 3/64 P<0.005).
AP was an unreliable marker for CAD in aortic valve disease or mitral incompetence. Conversely, CAD was uncommon without AP in mitral stenosis or mixed mitral valve disease.
Coronary arteriography seems indicated in the pre-operative assessment of patients aged40 years with aortic valve disease or mitral incompetence. Its value is limited in patients with mitral stenosis or mixed mitral valve disease without AP.     

Coronary lesions due to aortic valve disease. I -- Occurrence and clinical prognosis]

A multicentre retrospective study of 467 cases of operated aortic valve disease was undertaken to define the indications of coronary arteriography in the pre-operative work-up. Significant coronary artery disease was present in 15% of all cases or, more precisely, in 17% of cases with angina and in 8% when investigation was only routine. Coronary artery disease was more frequent in males, in patients with clinical or electrical evidence of previous myocardial infarction, in patients with ST-T wave changes, and when angina was severe (more than one attack per day). None of these factors was specific. It is therefore difficult to limit coronary arteriography to these patients or there would be a risk of missing significant lesions in a small number of cases. It is important to give the surgeon all the necessary information before aortic valve replacement and so coronary arteriography should be widely practiced in this context. However exceptions may be made for young patients and also those in congestive cardiac failure in whom coronary arteriography represents an unnecessary risk before surgery.     

Prevalence of significant coronary heart disease in valvular heart disease in Indian patients

Records of 326 patients were analysed to determine the prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) and to identify the group in whom coronary arteriography is essential. Significant CHD (60% or more luminal narrowing) was found in 7 per cent of cases, and its prevalence was 3 per cent in mitral, 10 per cent in aortic, and 6 per cent in combined mitral and aortic valve disease. Angina was present in 14 per cent of patients with mitral, 39 per cent with aortic, and 21 per cent with combined mitral and aortic valve disease. Seventy-three per cent of patients with CHD had angina whereas only 19 per cent with angina had CHD. The prevalence of CHD was higher in patients above 50 years (13%) and in males (98%) as compared to those below 50 years (3%) and females (none). We conclude that the prevalence of CHD is low in our patients with VHD. Routine coronary arteriography is recommended only in males over the age of 50 years.     

Coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acquired valvular disease

BACKGROUND: Coronary atherosclerosis often coexists with acquired valvular disorders. There is growing evidence in literature that these two conditions may have common aetiology. AIM: To assess the incidence of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acquired valvular disorders and to compare clinical parameters as well as the prevalence of risk factors between patients with aortic and mitral valve diseases. METHODS: The study group consisted of 155 patients (101 males, 54 females, mean age 58.2+/-9.7 years) with acquired valvular disorder who between 2000 and 2002 underwent invasive cardiac evaluation in our department prior to planned cardiac surgery. Aortic stenosis was detected in 74 patients, aortic insufficiency -- in 26, mitral stenosis -- in 33, and mitral regurgitation -- in 14 subjects. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiography, coronary angiography and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Patients with aortic stenosis had similar prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis to patients with aortic insufficiency, and patients with mitral stenosis -- to patients with mitral regurgitation. When the two groups -- patients with aortic valve disease and patients with mitral valve disease were compared, significant coronary lesions were more often detected in patients with aortic valve disease (36% vs 12.8%, p<0.05). Also, patients with aortic valve disorder were older, predominantly of male gender, had more often angina but less often heart failure, and had higher total cholesterol level than patients with mitral valve disease. CONCLUSIONS: Significant coronary lesions are more frequently encountered in patients with aortic valve disorder than in those with mitral valve disease. A high prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors in patients with aortic valve disease may suggest that this condition has similar aetiology to that of coronary artery disease.     

Report: Association of coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease in chile

This study analyzes the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) among patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease (VHD) in Chile. Coronary angiography was performed in all patients referred to cardiac catheterization with VHD who were over age 50 years and who had angina or ECG signs of ischemia. A total of 100 patients entered the study. Significant CAD (greater than 50% obstruction) was found in 14% of the cases: 7% in patients with mitral valve disease (MVD), 18% in aortic valve disease (AVD), and 21% in combined mitral and aortic valve disease (MAVD). Angina was present in 14% of the patients with MVD, 63% with AVD, and 53% with MAVD. Only 57% of patients with CAD had angina pectoris; 20% with angina had CAD. Hemodynamic parameters and left ventricular ejection fraction were not correlated with the presence or absence of CAD. We conclude that in patients with valvular heart disease, the incidence of CAD is lower in Chile than previously reported in the English literature. We confirmed the fact that angina is often not associated with CAD, and that CAD is often present in the absence of angina.     

Aortic stenosis, angina pectoris, and coronary artery disease.

The relationships between aortic stenosis, coronary artery disease, angina pectoris, and myocardial infarction were examined in 173 patients with isolated calcific aortic stenosis who had coronary arteriography as well as cardiac catheterization. All were over age 40 and had definite cardiac symptoms; 156 later had aortic valve replacement. Coronary lesions narrowing the lumen by 50% or more were present in 37% of patients aged 40 to 59 and 68% of those aged 60 to 82. Coronary disease was present in 64% of patients with angina pectoris and 33% of those without angina. Angina which occurred only in association with dyspnea on exertion was associated with coronary disease in 45% of instances, whereas angina which also occurred on exertion without any dyspnea or which occurred with emotional stress, after meals, during sleep, or at rest unprovoked was associated with coronary disease in 80% of instances. Patients with coronary disease without any chest pain or with atypical pain considered nonanginal were men, usually over age 60, with congestive heart failure as the predominant symptom. Electrocardiograms showing transmural inferior or anterolateral infarction nearly always indicated coronary disease, while QS patterns in Leads V1-2 occurred frequently with normal coronary arteries. Serum cholesterol was elevated in 23% of those with coronary disease and 8% of those without. A group of patients with moderate aortic stenosis could be identified, with aortic valve areas of 0.55 to 0.80 cm. per square meter, in whom coronary disease was the sole or chief cause of symptoms. The operative mortality rate with aortic valve replacement was 9.6% in those with coronary disease and 1.4% in those without significant coronary disease. Coronary disease is frequently present in patients with calcific aortic stenosis, particularly in those over 60, those with angina, and those with symptoms despite only moderate aortic stenosis. The type of anginal syndrome, the ECG evidence of transmural infarction, and the coronary risk factors provide additional clues for clinical diagnosis.     

Detection of coronary disease before valve surgery. Contribution of myocardial scintigraphy with dipyridamole

The detection of coronary disease before valve surgery remains difficult in the absence of coronary arteriography. The contribution of myocardial scintigraphy with dipyridamole (MS-DP) was studied in 34 consecutive patients with valve disease (11 mitral and 23 aortic) with a mean age of 63 +/- 11 years having undergone coronary arteriography before valve surgery. Coronary arteriography was performed because of angina (21 cases) or age (women greater than 50, men greater than 40). Positive criteria of coronary disease were the presence of at least one frank and clearly visible fault of myocardial perfusion (MS-DP positive) and at least one stenosis of greater than 70 per cent by coronary arteriography. Coronary disease existed in 13 patients (38 per cent). Ten patients (29 per cent) had a positive MS-DP. The sensitivity and specificity of MS-DP in detecting coronary disease were 69 per cent and 95 per cent respectively. Its positive predictive value was 90 per cent. MS-DP was negative in all asymptomatic patients (19 per cent of them having coronary disease) and in 11 symptomatic patients (18 per cent of them having coronary disease). The low positive predictive value of angina (52 per cent) increased to 90 per cent when combined with a positive MS-DP. Because of relatively low sensitivity, basing indications for coronary arteriography before valve surgery on the results of MS-DP cannot be advised.     

Prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with rheumatic heart disease in the current era

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing valve surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with rheumatic heart disease (n=376) who were above the age of 40 years, and scheduled for valve surgery underwent diagnostic coronary angiogram to delineate coronary arteries. The patients were divided into three groups based on valve involvement (mitral valve, aortic valve, and combined aortic and mitral valve). Significant coronary artery disease was considered to be present if one or more coronaries showed 50% or more luminal stenosis. There were 287 (76.3%) males and 89 (23.7%) females. The mean age of the study population was 51.2+/-8.2 years. Eighty-nine (23.8%) patients had typical chest pain, 116 (30.6%) patients had atypical chest pain and 171 (45.5%) patients had no chest pain. Hypertension was noted in 88 (23.4%) patients, 65 (17.3%) patients had diabetes, 98 (26.1%) patients were smoker, and 66 (17.6%) patients had dyslipidemia, and 15 (4.0%) patients gave past history of myocardial infarction. Of the total 376 patients, 46 (12.2%) patients were found to have significant coronary artery disease. In patients with mitral vale disease the prevalence was 13.5% (13/96), while it was 15.3% (19/124) in patients with aortic valve disease and 9% (14/156) in those with combined mitral and aortic valve disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the overall prevalence of coronary artery disease in a group of patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing valve surgery in the current era is 12.2%. This prevalence is much lower than the figures reported earlier in the Western literature.     

Association of aortic valve sclerosis and coronary artery disease in patients with severe nonischemic mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND: The presence of aortic valve sclerosis accounts for a higher rate of ischemic events and increased cardiovascular mortality. It may reflect coronary artery disease (CAD) because of a shared pathologic background. HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to analyze whether the presence of aortic valve sclerosis might help in identifying patients with coronary atherosclerosis among those with severe nonischemic mitral regurgitation (MR), who undergo coronary angiography before surgery for screening, and not because of suspected ischemic heart disease. METHODS: In all, 84 patients (mean age 64 +/- 9 years; 71% men) with mitral valve prolapse and severe regurgitation underwent echocardiography and coronary angiography. Aortic valve sclerosis was defined as focal areas of increased echogenicity and thickening of the leaflets without restriction of leaflet motion on echocardiography. Coronary artery disease was defined by the presence/absence of atherosclerotic plaques, independent of the degree of stenosis. RESULTS: Coronary artery disease was diagnosed in 47.6% of patients with and 15.8% of those without aortic valve sclerosis (p = 0.008). On logistic regression analysis, the presence of aortic valve sclerosis predicted CAD (odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval 1.03-10.5; p = 0.04) independent of age. In female patients, the risk ratio for CAD in the presence of aortic valve sclerosis was 9. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery atherosclerosis and aortic valve sclerosis are closely associated in patients with severe nonischemic MR.     

Prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with isolated aortic valve stenosis.

The prevalence of significant coronary artery disease (reduction in luminal diameter by more than 50%) among 88 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve replacement at Hammersmith Hospital was examined. Twenty two (34%) patients had significant coronary disease. Nineteen of 42 (45%) patients with typical angina had coronary disease; three of 20 (15%) patients with atypical chest pain had coronary disease, while none of 26 patients free of chest pain had significant coronary disease. Risk factors for coronary disease were equally distributed among patients with and without significant luminal obstruction. Because of the small, but definite, hazard of coronary arteriography and in the interest of cost containment it is suggested that patients with aortic stenosis who are free of chest pain do not require routine coronary arteriography. This applies particularly to patients requiring urgent aortic valve replacement.     

Chest pain as a predictor of coronary artery disease in patients with obstructive aortic valve disease

To clarify the association between chest pain and significant coronary artery disease in patients who have aortic valve disease, 76 consecutive candidates for aortic valve replacement were evaluated prospectively with use of a historical questionnaire and coronary arteriography. Of the 76 patients, 19 (25 percent) had no chest pain, 21 (28 percent) had chest pain that was not-typical of angina pectoris and 36 (47 percent) had chest pain typical of angina pectoris. In 18 of 19 patients the absence of chest pain correlated with the absence of coronary artery disease. The single patient without chest pain who had coronary artery disease had evidence of an inferior myocardial infarction in the electrocardiogram. Thus, absence of chest pain and the absence of electrocardiographic evidence of infarction predicted the absence of coronary disease in all cases.

The presence of chest pain did not predict the presence of coronary artery disease, but the more typical the pain of angina pectoris the more likely were patients to have significant coronary artery disease. Of the 21 patients with atypical chest pain, 6 (29 percent) had coronary artery disease, but of the 36 patients with typical angina pectoris 23 (64 percent) had significant coronary artery disease. In addition, when patients with chest pain not typical of angina pectoris also had coronary artery disease, the diseased vessels usually supplied smaller areas of the left ventricle than when the pain was typical of angina pectoris. In 21 of 23 patients (91 percent) with typical angina pectoris and significant coronary artery disease, lesions were present in the left coronary artery. There was no systolic pressure gradient across the aortic valve that excluded the presence of coronary artery disease, although all patients with a calculated aortic valve area of less than 0.4 cm² were free of coronary artery disease. Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction were more likely to have normal coronary arteries.     

Prevalence of coronary disease in patients with aortic stenosis]

We analyzed a consecutive series of 188 patients, older than 44 years, with significant aortic stenosis, who underwent coronary arteriography (73 women and 115 men). There were 38 patients (20.2%) with coronary artery disease ( or = 50% reduction in the luminal diameter). Sixty-eight patients had typical angina pectoris, 52 atypical angina, and 68 did not have chest pain. We found to have coronary disease in 29.4%, 23.1% and 8.8% respectively. Sensitivity of typical angina to detect coronary disease was 52.6%, with an specificity of 68%, and a negative predictive value of 85%. Inclusion of atypical angina improved the sensitivity to 84.2%, and the negative predictive value to 91.2%, but lessened the specificity to 41.4%. Six patients among the 38 with coronary disease (15.7%), did not have chest pain, and 3 of them were younger than 60 years. We conclude that absence of angina is not enough to exclude coronary artery disease in patients 50 years old with aortic stenosis being considered for aortic valve replacement.     

Angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in severe isolated valvular aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND: Angina pectoris has long been recognised as one of the principal symptoms of severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), even in patients without significant coronary artery disease (CAD). However, controversy exists concerning the prevalence of angina pectoris and associated CAD in such patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of CAD detectable by angiography and its relation to angina pectoris and coronary risk factors in patients with severe AS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with symptomatic AS who had undergone aortic valve replacement and preoperative cardiac catheterisation at the Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre between 1 January 1986 and 31 May 1996 were retrospectively analysed. Those patients with multiple valve disease, aortic regurgitation of grade 2 or more in severity, or who had had prior coronary artery or valve surgery were excluded from this analysis. RESULTS: A total of 328 consecutive patients with severe AS (242 men and 86 women; mean age 72 years, range 39-84 years) were studied. Significant CAD (reduction in luminal diameter > or = 50%) was found in 162 patients (49.4%). Typical angina was present in 74.7% of these 162 patients but it was also found in 44.6% of the 166 patients without obstructive CAD. Of the patients without angina (n = 133), 30.8% had significant CAD. By multivariate logistic regression, we have identified seven significant predictors for CAD among severe AS patients. Five factors increased risk. Expressed as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, these included: (i) age in years (1.07; 1.04-1.11, P = 0.001); (ii) male gender (2.09; 1.14-3.80, P = 0.016); (iii) angina pectoris (3.19; 1.89-5.37, P < 0.001); (iv) history of myocardial infarction (2.87; 1.38-5.97, P = 0.005); and (v) peripheral vascular disease (2.28; 1.28-4.05, P = 0.005). Factors associated with decreased likelihood of CAD were serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (0.58; 0.34-0.71, P = 0.002) and peak systolic gradient across the aortic valve (0.97; 0.95-0.99, P = 0.0113). CONCLUSION: Coronary arteriography can probably be omitted for a patient with severe AS if that patient has no symptoms of angina and has no risk factors known to increase its incidence.     

Coronary artery disease and its management: influence on survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement

Data from 1,156 patients greater than or equal to 30 years of age who underwent aortic valve replacement alone or with coronary artery bypass grafting from 1967 through 1976 (early series) and 227 similar patients operated on during 1982 and 1983 (late series) were reviewed. In the early series, 414 patients (36%) had preoperative coronary arteriography (group 1): group 1A (n = 224) did not have coronary artery disease, group 1B (n = 78) had coronary artery disease but did not undergo bypass grafting and group 1C (n = 112) had coronary artery disease and underwent bypass grafting. The 742 patients in group 2 did not have preoperative arteriography. Operative mortality rates (30 day) in groups 1A, 1B, 1C and 2 were 4.5, 10.3, 6.3 and 6.3%, respectively (p = NS). The 10 year survival in both groups 1 and 2 was 54%; in groups 1A, 1B and 1C it was 63, 36 and 49%, respectively (1A and 1B, p less than 0.01). In the late series, the 227 patients were divided into similar groups (group 1A, n = 73; 1B, n = 32; 1C, n = 99), and 90% had preoperative coronary arteriography. Operative mortality rates (30 day) for groups 1A, 1B and 1C were 1.4, 9.4 and 4.0%, respectively; that for group 2 (no preoperative arteriography, n = 23) was 4.3%. Definition of coronary anatomy by angiography seems important in most patients greater than or equal to 50 years old who are candidates for aortic valve replacement, and bypass grafting is recommended for those with significant coronary artery disease.     

Surgical implications and results of combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization.

To better define the indications for and results of simultaneous aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization, a cohort of 271 patients with angiographically defined coronary anatomy who underwent xenograft bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement were analyzed. Two hundred and twelve patients had predominant aortic stenosis, and 55 had pure aortic regurgitation. Discordance between the clinical assessment of angina and the angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease was apparent in 39 percent of the patients with aortic stenosis and 45 percent of the patients with aortic regurgitation. Thirty-seven percent of patients in the aortic stenosis subgroup without angina and 41 percent of patients in the aortic regurgitation subgroup without angina had hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement were performed in 101 patients. The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction and operative death was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in the subsets of patients with coronary disease than in those without coronary disease (9.9 percent versus 0.7 percent and 8.3 percent versus 2.2 percent, respectively). Late postoperative angina and myocardial infarction also correlated with the preoperative presence of coronary artery disease. Excluding operative mortality, the late actuarial survival rate (mean follow-up, 1.6 years; maximal follow-up, 4.9 years) was not statistically lower for the patients with coronary disease.It is concluded that angina pectoris in patients with aortic valve disease is not a reliable indicator of coronary artery disease and that patients with coronary disease who undergo aortic valve replacement have an increased risk. It is inferred from this study that preoperative coronary arteriography is advisable in most adults undergoing the evaluation of aortic valve disease and that simultaneous aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization may provide some protection against late attrition due to the combined effects of coexistent aortic valve and coronary artery disease.