乳腺导管内癌分子分型应用研究

目的 采用免疫组织化学检测方法 对乳腺导管内癌进行分子分型.方法 收集50例乳腺导管内癌存档蜡块,用单克隆抗体CK5/6、CK8、CK18、34βE12、p63、S-100、SMA、CD10、CD117、EGFR、ER、PR和HER2进行免疫组织化学EnVision法染色,按照免疫表型分为5种类型:腺腔A型(ER+/PR+/HER2-)、腺腔B型(ER+/PR+/HER2+)、正常乳腺样型(ER-/PR-/HER2-且不表达基底/肌上皮标记及EGFR)、HER2过表达型(ER-/PR-/HER2+)和基底细胞样型(ER-/PR-/HER2-,且至少表达一种基底型角蛋白和(或)肌上皮标记物或EGFR).结果 腺腔A型16例(32%),腺腔B型19例(38%),HER2过表达型13例(26%),基底细胞样型2例(4%),无正常乳腺型.2例基底细胞样型,均表达CK5/6、CD117,例1同时表达SMA,例2表达CK8、CK18、34βE12、S-100,均为高级别导管内癌.结论 乳腺导管内癌可按免疫表型进行分子分型,部分导管内癌具有与基底细胞样癌相同的免疫表型,可能是基底细胞样癌的前驱病变,其诊断依赖于免疫组化检测.     

Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast

The advent of mammography screening presents a diagnostic challenge to the cytopathologist as an increasing proportion of breast lesions requiring investigation will be nonpalpable and up to 40% will be accounted for by atypical intraductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ, as opposed to previously, when these lesions represented less than 10% of palpable tumors. We studied 133 fine-needle aspirates from breast tumors and found that nuclear morphology, myoepithelial cells, signs of invasion, and degree of cellular dissociation are among the most potent factors discriminating between benign epithelial proliferations, atypical intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma.     

Recognizing breast ductal carcinoma in situ on fine‐needle aspiration: A diagnostic dilemma

In this study, we evaluated cytomorphologic features of different subgroups of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); we compared seven cytologic features between DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) aspirates to determine whether diagnosis of stromal invasion can be made based on fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) findings. There were 142 cases of DCIS and 1,978 cases of IDC enrolled in our study. FNA analysis revealed 80.3% sensitivity for DCIS and 94.7% sensitivity for IDC. High and intermediate grade DCIS exhibited marked nuclear abnormality (92.1% vs. 35.7%, 30.0%; P1 < 0.001, P2 < 0.001) and necrosis (69.7% vs. 0%, 10.0%; P1 < 0.001, P2 = 0.001) in a higher percentage of cases compared to low grade DCIS and intraductal/intracystic papillary carcinoma. The rates of background macrophages (71.3% for DCIS and 21.9% for IDC, P < 0.001) and extensive necrosis (54.0% for DCIS and 16.7% for IDC, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in DCIS compared to IDC. Lymphocytes were observed in conjunction with tumor cells more frequently in IDC (81.3%) compared to DCIS (36.8%, P < 0.001). Stromal fragments associated with tumor cells were only observed in invasive lesions (11.9% micro‐invasive DCIS and 52.1% IDC). Tubular structures were found exclusively in IDC (11.5%). Cytologic criteria for diagnosis of high and low grade DCIS are different. The suspicion of DCIS is raised when background macrophages and extensive necrosis are observed. Stromal invasion is suggested by FNA if lymphocytes are entwined around tumor cells or if stromal fragments associated with tumor cells or tubular structures are observed. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:710–715. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Oestrogen receptor negativity as a marker for high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

AIMS: To compare the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative and ER-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, in an attempt to establish more objective criteria for the classification of DCIS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sections of 64 cases of in-situ carcinoma of the breast were stained for ER, progesterone receptors (PgR), androgen receptors (AR), c-erbB-2 and p53, using the immunoperoxidase technique. The cases included 60 DCIS and four lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Four DCIS lesions were associated with foci of microinvasion. The 60 DCIS cases included 31 high grade, 23 intermediate grade and six low grade. Twenty-four DCIS cases (40%) were ER-negative and 36 were positive. ER negativity was significantly associated with high nuclear grade (88% versus 27% for ER-positive cases, P < 0.001), PgR negativity (100% versus 25%, P < 0.001), c-erbB-2 positivity (79% versus 14%, P < 0.001) and p53 positivity (58% versus 6%, P < 0.001). There was no difference between ER-negative and -positive DCIS as regards AR expression, with 91% of cases in each group being AR-positive. Of the four cases of DCIS with microinvasion, three were ER- and PgR-negative, all four were c-erbB-2-positive and AR-positive and one was p53-positive. None of the four LCIS was ER, PgR or AR-negative and none was c-erbB-2- or p53-positive. CONCLUSIONS: There is a highly significant direct relationship between ER negativity in DCIS and high nuclear grade, PgR negativity and c-erbB-2 and p53 positivity. We suggest that immunohistological assessment of ER status may help in providing a more objective way of classifying DCIS.     

乳腺导管原位癌病理形态及c-erbB-2、p53和PCNA表达

目的：对乳腺导管原位癌进行病理形态分析，并行ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３癌基因蛋白、增殖细胞核抗原（ＰＣＮＡ）表达以及相关性的研究，以期为临床判断潜在恶性程度及预后提供参考指标。方法：运用病理形态分析以及枸橼酸－微波－ＡＢＣ免疫组化法对２５例常规福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋乳腺导管原位癌组织进行回顾性研究。结果：（１）２５例乳腺原位导管癌ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ表达的阳性率分别为３６．０％，４０．０％和４０．０％；（２）粉刺型ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ表达的阳性率均高于非粉刺型，而且ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２阳性率相差有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５）；（３）坏死、核异型性、核分裂数与ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ的表达有关，其中，坏死与ＰＣＮＡ阳性表达显著相关（Ｐ＜０．０５），核异型性与ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２蛋白表达显著相关（Ｐ＜０．０５）。结论：乳腺导管原位癌无论病理形态还是生物学行为都是异质性的，除了组织学亚型，某些形态指标以及ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２癌基因蛋白的表达也可作为恶性度指标。     

Predictors of disease progression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and vascular patterns

Breast carcinoma-induced angiogenesis helps meet growing metabolic needs of tumors and progressively increases with malignant transformation of benign ducts to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma. There are conflicting data regarding the difference in angiogenesis in low-, intermediate-, and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. If angiogenesis is related to ductal carcinoma in situ progression, the types of ductal carcinoma in situ with more aggressive biologic potential would have different vascular patterns than the less aggressive ones. In this study, we classified 51 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ as low (10-20 years to progression to invasive carcinoma), moderate, or high aggressive (2-5 years to progression to invasive carcinoma), based on criteria outlined by Tsikitis and Chung (Am J Clin Oncol 2006; 29:305), which takes into account nuclear grade, mitotic rate, Ki-67, Her2Neu, P53, estrogen, and progesterone receptor expression. We correlated these 3 groups of ductal carcinoma in situ with the extent of periductal and stromal vascularity and the presence and type of vascular breaks. No association of aggressive biologic behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ with any vascular pattern was found. Moreover, no correlation was found between vascular patterns and classifiers of aggressiveness, microvascular density, or outcome (local recurrence, invasive carcinoma, or metastatic disease). To validate our cohort, we confirmed expected correlations of all measured parameters of aggressiveness by correlating them with each other. In summary, vascular patterns in ductal carcinoma in situ do not correlate with the predictors of aggressive behavior, suggesting that the biologic potential of ductal carcinoma in situ is independent of angiogenesis.     

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization of ductal carcinoma in situ and synchronous invasive lobular cancer

It has been increasingly recognized that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and invasive cancer of the breast are often closely associated with one another. However, the genomic relationship between these histologically distinct entities has not been well characterized. Refinements in high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) techniques allow for a detailed comparison of genomic alterations in synchronously occurring tumors. The following case illustrates how array CGH may be used to better understand whether synchronous neoplasms share a common origin.     

A critical appraisal of six modern classifications of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS): correlation with grade of associated invasive carcinoma

The in-situ component of 180 cases of screen detected infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast was classified according to six published classifications for ductal carcinoma in situ based on architecture, necrosis and cytology. All cases were assessed independently by two experienced observers to assess inter-observer variation. The differentiation of ductal carcinoma in situ as assessed by all the classification systems correlated with the grade of the associated invasive carcinoma (chi-squared between 50 and 107: P <0.0001). Disagreements were commonest in the assessment of architecture and least common in the assessment of necrosis. For cytonuclear grade most disagreements (62.2%) involved the distinction between low and intermediate as against 33.9% disagreements for intermediate vs. high. Nuclear grade alone and necrosis alone were correlated with the grade of invasive carcinoma associated with the ductal carcinoma in situ and the Nottingham prognostic index of the patient. The Van Nuys classification of ductal carcinoma in situ is commended because it has a low inter-observer disagreement, is significantly correlated with the grade of the infiltrating carcinoma, uses simple well-defined criteria (with no requirement for percentage estimations), is applicable to small numbers of ducts and, most importantly, appears to correlate with disease-free survival.     

Cyclin D1 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ, atypical ductal hyperplasia and usual ductal hyperplasia: an immunohistochemical study

The cell cycle regulatory gene, Cyclin D1, plays a critical role in the growth and progression of several types of human cancer, including breast cancer. Immunohistochemical study of Cyclin D1 expression has been extensively reported in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In contrast, there have been few reports concerning Cyclin D1 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and their positive rates are variable. The differences in the reported frequency may be largely due to the differences in antibodies used, immunohistochemical methods and the positive cut-off point. However, we speculated that the strictness of diagnosis of DCIS might be somewhat responsible for these differences in frequency. Therefore, we selected cases of DCIS by carefully eliminating cases of predominantly intraductal carcinoma (PIC). Moreover, to clarify whether Cyclin D1 expression is involved in multistep carcinogenesis or the progression of human breast cancer, we immunohistochemically investigated Cyclin D1 expression in 57 DCIS, 10 atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 70 usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), 44 PIC and 92 IDC. Cyclin D1 expression was detected in 41 DCIS cases (72%), 22 PIC cases (50%) and 40 IDC cases (43%). No expression of Cyclin D1 was observed in either ADH or UDH. There were no significant correlations between Cyclin D1 expression and histological grade or estrogen receptor expression in DCIS. These results suggest that Cyclin D1 expression may play an important role in the early stages of carcinogenesis, and that immunohistochemical detection of Cyclin D1 expression may be helpful in differentiating low-grade DCIS from ADH.     

Widespread chromosomal abnormalities in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Comparative genomic hybridization study of pure high-grade DCIS

For a variety of technical reasons it is rarely possible to study cytogenetic abnormalities in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using traditional techniques. However, by combining molecular biology and computerized image analysis it is possible to carry out cytogenetic analyses on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of chromosomal amplifications and deletions in high-grade DCIS and to look specifically for unique or consistent abnormalities in this pre-invasive cancer. Twenty-three cases of asymptomatic, non-palpable, screen-detected, high-grade DCIS were examined using CGH on tumour cells obtained from histology slides. All cases showed chromosomal abnormalities. A wide variety of amplifications and deletions were spread across the genome. The most frequent changes were gains of chromosomes 17 (13 of 23), 16p (13 of 23), and 20q (9 of 23) and amplifications of 11q13 (22 of 23), 12q 24.1–24.2 (12 of 23), 6p21.3 (11 of 23), and 1q31-qter (6 of 23). The most frequent deletions were on 13q 21.3–q33 (7 of 23), 9p21 (4 of 23), and 6q16.1 (4 of 23). These findings indicate that high-grade DCIS is, from a cytogenetic viewpoint, an advanced lesion. There was no absolutely consistent finding in every case, but amplification of 11q13 was found in 22 of the 23 cases. The precise significance of this is unknown at present. This region of chromosome 11q harbours a number of known oncogenes, including cyclinD1 and INT2. It is likely that many of these findings are the result of accumulated chromosomal abnormalities, reflecting an unstable genome in established malignancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

CD24 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: an immunohistochemistry-based pilot study

CD24 is a small, heavily glycosylated cell surface protein, that is expressed in a large variety of solid tumors. It is considered to play an important role in tumor progression and metastasis. We aimed to evaluate CD24 expression in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCa), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and non-tumorous breast tissues, and to investigate the relationship between histopathological parameters, estrogen and progesterone receptors, and c-erbB2 expressions. The study included 34 IDCa, 25 DCIS, and 13 non-tumorous breast tissues. All cases were reevaluated histopathologically, and immunohistochemistry was performed with monoclonal CD24 antibody. The results clearly demonstrated that CD24 expression, including membranous and cytoplasmic staining, was significantly higher in DCIS and IDCa than in the non-tumorous breast (p=0.001, p=0.000, and p=0.035, p=0.000, respectively). Cytoplasmic staining was detected predominantly in neoplastic tissues and was significantly increased in high grade DCIS (p=0.013). In invasive carcinomas, although the level of membranous staining was significantly positively correlated with tumor grade (p=0.040), there was no such an association with the cytoplasmic level. However, it showed a trend towards pT (p=0.089). In conclusion, our results suggest that higher CD24 expression may be associated with malignant transformation and progression in breast cancer biology. Furthermore, higher membranous expression and, in particular, cytoplasmic staining seem to predict malignant transformation, and different patterns of CD24 expression may be associated with different pathological features in breast tumors.     

Identification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ

Microarray profiling of invasive breast carcinomas has identified subtypes including luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpressing, and basal-like. The poor-prognosis, basal-like tumors have been immunohistochemically characterized as estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, HER2/neu-negative, and cytokeratin 5/6-positive and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of basal-like ductal carcinoma in situ in a population-based series of cases using immunohistochemical surrogates. A total of 245 pure ductal carcinoma in situ cases from a population-based, case-control study were evaluated for histologic characteristics and immunostained for ER, HER2/neu, EGFR, cytokeratin 5/6, p53, and Ki-67. The subtypes were defined as: luminal A (ER+, HER2-), luminal B (ER+, HER2+), HER2 positive (ER-, HER2+), and basal-like (ER-, HER2-, EGFR+, and/or cytokeratin 5/6+). The prevalence of breast cancer subtypes was basal-like (n = 19 [8%]); luminal A, n = 149 (61%); luminal B, n = 23 (9%); and HER2+/ER-, n = 38 (16%). Sixteen tumors (6%) were unclassified (negative for all 4 defining markers). The basal-like subtype was associated with unfavorable prognostic variables including high-grade nuclei (P < .0001), p53 overexpression (P < .0001), and elevated Ki-67 index (P < .0001). These studies demonstrate the presence of a basal-like in situ carcinoma, a potential precursor lesion to invasive basal-like carcinoma.     

Loss of heterozygosity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at loci reported to show allele loss in invasive breast cancers was examined in ductal in situ carcinomas of the breast using polymorphic short tandem repeats and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). LOH was detected at all loci examined in at least 11 per cent of the samples examined. The proportion of cases of in situ carcinoma showing LOH at these loci was similar to that previously reported in invasive cancers. Cases of pure in situ cancer without an invasive component exhibited an overall lower frequency of allele loss. LOH at more than one locus was observed in some intraductal cancers. In a small number of cases, LOH was present in the invasive but not in the intraductal component of the tumour, suggesting that mutation at the locus concerned was associated with development of invasive behaviour.     

乳腺原位癌的起源和发展

目的：探讨乳腺原位癌的起源和发展,兼论乳腺癌组织学分类。方法：观察５０例乳腺原位癌ＨＥ染色切片,部分切片做Ｗｅｉｇｒｅｔ弹力纤维当构及ｖａｎＧｉｅｓｏｎ胶原染色。：５０例导管在位癌中３８例（７６％）合并有小叶原位大部分导管原位癌癌巢不是在导管内,而是在小叶的位置,其壁上无弹力纤维包绕。结论：导管原位癌和小叶原位癌无题自末梢导管小叶单位发性。小叶原位癌可能是原位癌的早期阶段,可在原位发展为导管原位癌     

Usual ductal hyperplasia of the breast is a committed stem (progenitor) cell lesion distinct from atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ

Current classification systems in proliferative mammary gland pathology are based on a two-cell system, recognizing only glandular and myoepithelial lines of differentiation. A third cell type has recently been characterized in normal breast tissue by double-immunofluorescence analysis to express cytokeratin 5 (Ck5) only. These cells were shown to represent progenitor or adult stem cells that give rise to the glandular and myoepithelial cell lineage. The double-labelling technique has been applied to characterize a spectrum of intraductal epithelial proliferations, namely benign usual ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and ductal carcinoma in situ, all of which are thought to represent the gradual steps of a sequence in the development of breast cancer. Immunofluorescence studies with specific antibodies against Ck5, Ck8/18/19, and smooth muscle actin were complemented by western blotting analysis of Ck5 and Ck8/18/19 expression in normal breast tissue and in proliferative lesions. Usual ductal hyperplasia appears to be a Ck5-positive committed stem (progenitor) cell lesion with the same differentiation potential as seen in the normal breast. This is in sharp contrast to atypical ductal hyperplasia/ductal carcinoma in situ, which display the differentiated glandular immunophenotype (Ck8/18/19-positive, but Ck5-negative). These data require the abandonment of the idea of an obligate biological continuum of intraductal proliferations from benign to malignant. This study provides evidence that cells undergoing malignant transformation tend to be fairly advanced in the glandular lineage of differentiation. The committed stem (progenitor) cell model may contribute to a better understanding of both benign proliferative breast disease and breast cancer development.     

Validation of immunolocalization of the urokinase receptor expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison with detection by non-isotopic in-situ hybridization

AIMS: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive form of mammary carcinoma with no microscopic evidence of cancer cell invasion through the basement membrane. However, for initiation of invasion, tumour cells have to acquire and focus proteolytic activity on to the cell surface in order to infiltrate the surrounding extracellular matrix. The receptor (uPA-R or CD87) for the serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) plays a central role in invasion and metastasis. This study was performed to determine and localize m-RNA and protein of uPA-R in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed uPA-R mRNA and protein expression by in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively, in 50 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of DCIS. Three different antibodies were used to stain cell-associated uPA-R; chicken polyclonal antibody (pAb) HU277 and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) IID7 and 3936. In all cases, myoepithelial and stromal cells reacted with either antibody. Especially, reaction of macrophage-like cells with mAb 3936 resulted in a well-marked and bright staining. Applying mAb IID7, in 46 of the 50 breast specimens tumour cells showed a positive immunoreaction. Likewise pAb HU277 stained tumour cells in 40 of the 50 cases, whereas mAb 3936 reacted with only 24 of the 50 tissue sections. Endothelial cells were marked by both mAb IID7 and pAb HU277 (46/50 and 35/50, respectively); mAb 3936 did not label at all. All of the cell types stained by mAb IID7 and pAb HU277 also displayed reactivity with uPA-R mRNA-specific antisense oligonucleotides in in-situ hybridization. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal the presence of the tumour invasion-related receptor for the protease uPA not only in invasive ductal breast carcinoma but also in different types of DCIS.     

Comparative genomic hybridization of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast—evidence of multiple genetic pathways

There is strong evidence that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a precursor lesion of invasive breast cancer. In order to analyse specific chromosomal alterations of DCIS, 38 paraffin-embedded specimens of DCIS and six associated invasive carcinomas were examined by means of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Losses of 16q material were seen almost exclusively in well- and intermediately-differentiated DCIS. These two subgroups differed in the average number of genetic imbalances, 2·5 and 5·5 respectively. Additionally, a higher frequency of gains of 1q and losses of 11q material was seen in intermediately-differentiated in contrast to well-differentiated DCIS. Poorly-differentiated DCIS displayed a higher frequency of amplifications (17q12, 11q13) and a higher average rate of genetic imbalances (7·1). Analysis of adjacent invasive breast carcinoma revealed a genetic pattern almost identical to the one seen in the DCIS counterpart. These data characterize DCIS as a genetically far-advanced, heterogeneous lesion and as a direct precursor of invasive breast cancer. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Atypical ductal hyperplasia is a multipotent precursor of breast carcinoma

The current model for breast cancer progression proposes independent ‘low grade (LG)-like’ and ‘high grade (HG)-like’ pathways but lacks a known precursor to HG cancer. We applied low-coverage whole-genome sequencing to atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) with and without carcinoma to shed light on breast cancer progression. Fourteen out of twenty isolated ADH cases harboured at least one copy number alteration (CNA), but had fewer aberrations than LG or HG ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). ADH carried more HG-like CNA than LG DCIS (e.g. 8q gain). Correspondingly, 64% (7/11) of ADH cases with synchronous HG carcinoma were clonally related, similar to LG carcinoma (67%, 6/9). This study represents a significant shift in our understanding of breast cancer progression, with ADH as a common precursor lesion to the independent ‘low grade-like’ and ‘high grade-like’ pathways. These data suggest that ADH can be a precursor of HG breast cancer and that LG and HG carcinomas can evolve from a similar ancestor lesion. We propose that although LG DCIS may be committed to a LG molecular pathway, ADH may remain multipotent, progressing to either LG or HG carcinoma. This multipotent nature suggests that some ADH cases could be more clinically significant than LG DCIS, requiring biomarkers for personalising management. Copyright © 2019 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.