Electrothermal capsulorrhaphy in glenohumeral instability without bankart tear

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to review the clinical results of electrothermal capsulorrhaphy (ETC) performed on 23 patients for the treatment of glenohumeral instability at an minimum follow-up of 2 years. Type of Study: Retrospective case series. Methods: Twenty-six patients with symptomatic unidirectional or multidirectional glenohumeral instability without Bankart tear were treated with ETC using a radiofrequency probe. No labral repairs were performed. A standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol was followed. Patients were evaluated with respect to motion, direction of instability, need for repeat surgery, return to overhand sports, and symptoms of pain and instability using various scores. Results: Twenty-three patients were available for follow-up evaluation at an average of 30 months. The overall average ASES and Rowe scores were 84.2 and 79.3, respectively. Recurrent instability requiring an open stabilization procedure occurred in 4 patients (17%), 2 with anterior and 2 with multidirectional instability. Seven of 14 overhead athletes (50%) reported inability to return to their previous level. According to Rowe scores, overall results were 11 excellent, 5 good, 4 fair, and 3 poor. No postoperative nerve complications occurred. Conclusions: The ETC procedure was safely performed to treat glenohumeral instability without Bankart lesions. The recurrence rate is similar to that for other arthroscopic procedures but higher than for open surgery. In the absence of Bankart tear, patients with multidirectional instability and overhand athletes may require something other than an isolated ETC procedure to address instability. Long-term results of ETC are needed to better define its surgical indications.     

Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: Open versus arthroscopic technique

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of open and arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors in traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. Variables measured were recurrence rate, range of motion, and return to preinjury activity. Type of Study: Case control study. Methods: Eighty-nine shoulders in 88 patients with traumatic unilateral anterior shoulder instability were evaluated using Rowe and University of California Los Angeles scores, recurrence, return to activity, and range of motion by an independent examiner at an average of 39 months after either an arthroscopic or open Bankart repair using suture anchors. The arthroscopic technique included a minimum of 3 anchors in most patients and a routine incorporation of capsular plication and proximal shift. Of the 89 shoulders, 30 shoulders (30 patients) underwent open Bankart repair and 59 shoulders (58 patients) underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Results: Twenty-six shoulders (86.6%) in the open repair group showed excellent or good results, and 54 (91.5%) shoulders in the arthroscopic repair group showed excellent or good results. The arthroscopic group revealed slightly higher scores in the Rowe (P = .041) and UCLA scores (P = .026). Two patients (6.7%) in the open repair group and 2 (3.4%) in the arthroscopic repair group had experienced at least 1 episode of redislocation after the surgery. One patient (3.3%) in the open repair group and 4 (6.8%) in the arthroscopic repair group demonstrated mild apprehension. The overall residual instability was 10% in the open repair group and 10.2% in the arthroscopic repair group. There were no significant differences in the loss of external rotation and return to prior activity between the 2 groups (P > .05). Residual instability occurred more frequently in patients with fewer anchors. Conclusions: Arthroscopic suture anchor capsulorraphy showed similar results to the open Bankart procedure.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 18, No 7 (September), 2002: pp 755–763     

Editorial Commentary: Recurrence After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: What the Instability Severity Index Score Will and Will Not Predict

The recurrence of shoulder instability is a challenging complication after anterior open or arthroscopic stabilization in patients with glenohumeral instability. Use of the arthroscopic Bankart procedure has increased over the last decade, because of its less invasiveness and low complication rates compared with the Latarjet procedure. However, arthroscopic repair has the possibility of a greater recurrent instability rate. The Instability Shoulder Index Score (ISIS) has been developed to predict the success of isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair for the management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The risk factors associated with the recurrence of instability are age, level and type of sports participation, shoulder hyperlaxity, and humeral and glenoid bony lesions. The ISIS is a validated tool to predict the recurrence of dislocation after arthroscopic surgery in patients with shoulder instability. The arthroscopic Bankart procedure can be performed in patients with ISIS ≤3 with a low risk of recurrence of glenohumeral instability. The Latarjet procedure should be recommended in patients with ISIS >6. The management of patients with ISIS between 4 and 6 is still controversial and ranges from arthroscopic Bankart procedure with the addition of remplissage to the Latarjet procedure. Because advanced imaging techniques, such as computed tomography scans, allow us to assess appropriately the glenoid and humeral bone defect, their use is recommended in addition to ISIS.     

Results and factors affecting outcome of revision surgery for shoulder instability

We conducted a clinical study identifying the causes of failure and the variables affecting outcome in 28 patients with failed open or arthroscopic anterior shoulder reconstruction for anterior glenohumeral instability. All patients underwent an open revision stabilization procedure. Surgical outcomes at a minimum 24 months' follow-up were available in 25 patients. The most common findings at revision surgery were capsular redundancy and Bankart lesions. Satisfactory results were found in 21 patients (84%) after repeat instability surgery. Factors contributing to negative outcome were glenohumeral arthritis, age greater than 30 years, 2 or more previous instability procedures, a bony Bankart lesion, the diagnosis of multidirectional instability, and surgery involving the nondominant arm (P < .05). Revision shoulder stabilization can be successful when the correct diagnosis is made and appropriate surgery performed. However, the outcome is less predictable in patients with multiple previous surgeries.     

Arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesion in traumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability using the two-portal method: A preliminary report

BackgroundIn this report, we describe our preliminary clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair in traumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability using the two-portal method.MethodFrom August 2009 to December 2011, arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesion using this method was performed in 16 consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled. Fifteen shoulders were treated with two-anchor sutures and one was treated with three-anchor sutures. Twelve patients received metallic anchor screws and four patients received bioanchor screws. The assessments were performed using the Rowe score, the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and the shoulder range of motion (ROM) deficit.ResultsWith an average follow-up period of 22.9 months, all shoulder scores improved after surgery (p < 0.001). The average ROM deficit of the operated shoulders was not significant as compared with the healthy side in forward elevation (p > 0.05), but was significant in external rotation (p < 0.05). All of the 16 shoulders remained stable (100%) after the arthroscopic repair surgery. All patients returned to their preinjury levels of daily activity without recurrent problems.ConclusionIn patients with traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability, arthroscopic Bankart repair with the two portal method can provide good results. It can be an alternative method of treating patients with Bankart lesion without associated major glenoid defect or rotator cuff lesion in traumatic anterior-inferior instability.     

Increased Risk of Short-Term Complications and Venous Thromboembolism in Latarjet-Bristow Procedures Compared With Bankart Repairs

PurposeTo (1) determine the rate of surgical complications and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair, open Bankart repair, or Latarjet-Bristow; and (2) assess potential risk factors for surgical complications and VTE in patients undergoing shoulder stabilization procedures.MethodsThe NSQIP database was used to identify patients undergoing isolated surgery for shoulder instability from 2005 to 2017. Demographic data were collected and compared. Logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for developing a postoperative complication, and regression analyses were used to evaluate the odds of postoperative complications between types of surgery.ResultsWe identified 7,233 patients for inclusion. Patients undergoing Latarjet-Bristow were more likely to be male and Black and to report current tobacco use. Overall, there was a low rate of surgical complications (0.4%) and VTE (0.2%). However, patients undergoing Latarjet-Bristow had nearly a 10-fold increase in the risk of surgical complications compared with an arthroscopic or open Bankart repair (1.9% versus 0.2%, P < .001), including deep surgical site infections, return to operating room within 30 days, and symptomatic VTE (deep venous thrombosis rate: arthroscopic Bankart repair, 0.1%; Latarjet-Bristow, 0.8%; P < .001). There were no differences in the odds of developing a surgical complication or VTE between patients undergoing arthroscopic or open Bankart repair.ConclusionThis study used a nationally representative, widely validated, peer-reviewed database to demonstrate that patients undergoing a Latarjet-Bristow procedure are at significantly higher risk for short-term postoperative complications, including deep surgical site infections, return to the operating room, and symptomatic VTE, than those undergoing Bankart repair. These findings should not discourage surgeons from proceeding with a coracoid transfer procedure when indicated for glenoid deficiencies, but should inform preoperative counseling and help guide perioperative care to optimize patient outcomes.Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective comparative trial     

Arthroskopischer Korakoidtransfer

Recurrent anterior shoulder instability is a frequent and severe problem for patients. The Bankart operation with reconstruction of the labrum, capsule and ligament is the established treatment method, which is usually performed arthroscopically. However, the results of the Bankart operation deteriorate if there is significant bone loss at the glenoid or humerus and also when there is structural damage to the anteroinferior glenohumeral ligament and labrum. In 1954 Latarjet described the technique of coracoid transfer to the anterior glenoid. This procedure has become popular for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability especially in France and is performed in an open technique.In this paper we describe the indications, operative technique and early results of coracoid transfer in a completely arthroscopic technique.     

The Incidence of Posterior and Combined AP Shoulder Instability Treatment with Surgical Stabilization Is Higher in an Active Military Population than in the General Population: Findings from the US Naval Academy

BackgroundAnterior instability has consistently been shown to be the most common type of glenohumeral instability. Recent studies have demonstrated a higher percentage of posterior and combined (anterior and posterior) instability than had previously been reported; however, this work has not been replicated recently in a particularly young military population, which may be representative of an especially athletic or high-demand group.Question/purposeWhat proportion of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures are performed to address isolated anterior instability, isolated posterior instability, and combined instability in a young, military population?MethodsBetween August 2009 and January 2020, two sports medicine fellowship–trained surgeons performed arthroscopic shoulder surgery on 543 patients at a single institution. During that time, the indication to be treated with arthroscopic stabilization surgery was symptomatic glenohumeral instability, as diagnosed by the operative surgeon, that restricted patients from carrying out their military duties. Of those, 82% (443 of 543) could be evaluated in this retrospective study, while 18% (100 of 543) were excluded due to either incomplete data or because the procedure performed was not to address instability. No patient underwent an open stabilization procedure during this period. Of the 443 patients investigated, the mean age was 22 ± 4 years, and 88% (392 of 443 patients) were men. Instability type was characterized as isolated anterior, isolated posterior, or combined (anterior and posterior) according to the physician’s diagnosis as listed in the patient’s clinical records and operative reports after the particular capsulolabral pathology was identified and addressed.ResultsIsolated anterior instability occurred in 47% of patients (210 of 443). Isolated posterior instability happened in 18% of patients (80 of 443), while combined anteroposterior instability occurred in 35% of patients (153 of 443).ConclusionShoulder instability is common in the military population. Although anterior instability occurred most frequently, these findings demonstrate higher proportions of posterior and combined instability than have been previously reported. Surgeons should have a heightened suspicion for posterior and combined anteroposterior labral pathology when performing arthroscopic stabilization procedures to ensure that these instability patterns are recognized and treated appropriately. The current investigation examines a unique cohort of young and active individuals who are at particularly high risk for instability and whose findings may represent a good surrogate for other active populations that a surgeon may encounter.Level of Evidence Level III; therapeutic study.     

Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: Significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion

Purpose: Our goal was to analyze the results of 194 consecutive arthroscopic Bankart repairs (performed by 2 surgeons with an identical suture anchor technique) in order to identify specific factors related to recurrence of instability. Type of Study: Case series. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 194 consecutive arthroscopic Bankart repairs by suture anchor technique performed for traumatic anterior-inferior instability. The average follow-up was 27 months (range, 14 to 79 months). There were 101 contact athletes (96 South African rugby players and 5 American football players). We identified significant bone defects on either the humerus or the glenoid as (1) “inverted-pear” glenoid, in which the normally pear-shaped glenoid had lost enough anterior-inferior bone to assume the shape of an inverted pear; or (2) “engaging” Hill-Sachs lesion of the humerus, in which the orientation of the Hill-Sachs lesion was such that it engaged the anterior glenoid with the shoulder in abduction and external rotation. Results: There were 21 recurrent dislocations and subluxations (14 dislocations, 7 subluxations). Of those 21 shoulders with recurrent instability, 14 had significant bone defects (3 engaging Hill-Sachs and 11 inverted-pear Bankart lesions). For the group of patients without significant bone defects (173 shoulders), there were 7 recurrences (4% recurrence rate). For the group with significant bone defects (21 patients), there were 14 recurrences (67% recurrence rate). For contact athletes without significant bone defects, there was a 6.5% recurrence rate, whereas for contact athletes with significant bone defects, there was an 89% recurrence rate. Conclusions: (1) Arthroscopic Bankart repairs give results equal to open Bankart repairs if there are no significant structural bone deficits (engaging Hill-Sachs or inverted-pear Bankart lesions). (2) Patients with significant bone deficits as defined in this study are not candidates for arthroscopic Bankart repair. (3) Contact athletes without structural bone deficits may be treated by arthroscopic Bankart repair. However, contact athletes with bone deficiency require open surgery aimed at their specific anatomic deficiencies. (4) For patients with significant glenoid bone loss, the surgeon should consider reconstruction by means of the Latarjet procedure, using a large coracoid bone graft.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related surgery, Vol 16, No 7 (October), 2000: pp 677–694     

Arthroscopic Bankart repair with extracapsular and extra-articular knot using the Mitek suture anchor.

The recurrence of instability after arthroscopic stabilization has been significantly higher than after open repair. One of the reasons for the high failure rate is the inability of arthroscopic repairs to address the plastic deformity of the capsule that occurs in the glenohumeral ligament-labrum complex. The arthroscopic technique is used to repair the torn labrum to the glenoid, but without adequate tightening of the anterior capsule, which is successfully accomplished with an open technique. This report describes the new technique of arthroscopic Bankart repair with extracapsular and extra-articular knot using suture anchors that allows tightening of the anterior capsule sufficiently as with an open Bankart procedure.     

Shoulder dislocation and -subluxation

The diagnosis and treatment of shoulder instability require basic differentiation between unidirectional, multidirectional, and voluntary dislocation. Within unidirectional instability primary dislocation, recurrent dislocation, and recurrent subluxation need to be considered separately.--Primary dislocation: In 160 patients with primary dislocation a follow-up was done by questionnaire. In the case of atraumatic primary dislocation the redislocation rate was 100%. Predisposing factors inherent in the bony, cartilaginous, and capsular components of the joint favoured the tendency of primary dislocation. In the case of traumatic primary dislocation the redislocation rate was lower after immobilisation of the joint than without when it had not been immobilised.--Recurrent subluxation: In 52 patients with a clinical diagnosis of recurrent subluxation a tear of the glenoid labrum was found by arthroscopy. In 21 cases the detached labrum was refixed arthroscopically and in 18 cases the repair was done by an open Bankart procedure. Seventy-two percent of the patients who underwent arthroscopic repair showed good to excellent results. In all cases but one in which the Bankart procedure was applied the results were excellent.--Recurrent dislocation: Since 1984 a total of 183 patients were operated on for recurrent shoulder dislocation. All these patients were examined preoperatively by CT scan. The CT findings were used in selection of the appropriate procedure. In 114 patients the Bankart procedure was applied and in 39 cases, a bone-block method. The remaining patients were subjected to various other procedures. Not one of the patients showed postoperative redislocation. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Increasing preoperative dislocations and total time of dislocation affect surgical management of anterior shoulder instability

Purpose:Our purpose was to determine the relationship between number of preoperative shoulder dislocations and total dislocation time and the need to perform bone deficiency procedures at the time of primary anterior instability surgery. Our hypothesis was that need for bone deficiency procedures would increase with the total number and hours of dislocation.Results:Ten arthroscopic Bankart repairs, 13 arthroscopic Bankart plus remplissage procedures, and 9 Latarjet reconstructions were available for review. Total dislocations (P = 0.012) and total hours of dislocation (P = 0.019) increased from the Bankart, to the remplissage, to the Latarjet groups. Patients with a total dislocation time of 5 h or more were more likely to require a Latarjet reconstruction (P = 0.039). Patients with only 1 preoperative dislocation were treated with an isolated Bankart repair in 64% (7 of 11) of cases, whereas those with 2 or more dislocations required a bone loss procedure in 86% (18 of 21) of cases (P = 0.013).Conclusion:Increasing number of dislocations and total dislocation time are associated with the development of glenoid and humeral head bony lesions that alter surgical management of anterior shoulder instability. The necessity for the addition of a remplissage to an arthroscopic Bankart repair or the use of a Latarjet reconstruction increases with only 1 recurrent dislocation.

Level of evidence:

Level III, retrospective comparative study.     

Recent advances in arthroscopic repair of traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability

Traumatic anterior instability is the most common type of glenohumeral instability. Although surgical treatment with an open technique has produced excellent results, there has been a trend toward arthroscopic treatment. As understanding of instability advances along with improvements in surgical techniques and instrumentation, arthroscopic results are fast approaching those seen with open procedures. Studies done at the authors' institution showed a 97% satisfactory outcome at short-term followup with 93% stable shoulders in a patient population with high physical demands. Others recently reported similar results. As more surgeons become familiar with the techniques, it is thought that arthroscopic Bankart reconstructions will be the preferred method in the future.     

Open surgical repair restores joint forces that resist glenohumeral dislocation

Traumatic anterior shoulder instability is a clinical problem often observed in athletes participating in overhead activities. The standard treatment for this condition is surgical repair, which may be accomplished by an open or arthroscopic procedure. The current authors assessed the strength of open repair, by comparing glenohumeral joint forces in intact specimens with specimens with anterior dislocation and open repair. Eighteen shoulders from cadavers were tested on a custom shoulder dislocation device with simulated muscle forces. Bankart lesions were repaired using a three-suture anchor technique combined with capsular advancement. Capsular failures were addressed by sharp dissection of the labrum from bone, then repaired as above, and the experiment was repeated. One-way analysis of variance was used for analyses. All specimens dislocated anteroinferiorly, eight dislocated by bony Bankart failure, and 10 dislocated by capsular failure. Maximum joint compression force for the initial dislocation was 760 +/- 79 N for the specimens with Bankart failures and 690 +/- 59 N for the specimens with capsular failures. The maximum joint compression force for dislocation after repair measured 541 +/- 50 N for the specimens with Bankart failures and 536 +/- 46 N for the specimens with capsular failures. The forces after repair were normalized with respect to the intact shoulders. For specimens with Bankart failures, joint compression and pectoralis major forces were 72% and 62%, respectively, and 79% and 61% for specimens with capsular failures. A three-dimensional digitizing system confirmed restoration of glenohumeral position. These results support clinical data, showing that open Bankart repair adequately restores the static restraints of the glenohumeral joint that resist anteroinferior dislocation.     

两种手术方法治疗习惯性肩关节前下脱位的比较

目的 对比研究小切口改良Bristow手术和关节镜下带线锚钉修复Bankart损伤治疗肩关节习惯性前下脱位的临床疗效.方法 2004年6月至2008年1月对20例习惯性肩关节前下脱位患者根据其经济状况进行分组,11例采用小切口改良Bristow手术,为小切13组;9例采用关节镜下带线锚钉垂直褥式缝合修复Bankart损伤,为关节镜组.回顾分析两组的手术时间、术后Rowe肩关节功能修正评分;观察两组的复发率与并发症发生情况.结果 手术时间:小切口组平均为45 min,关节镜组平均为51min.术后Rowe肩关节修正评分:小切口组为80～95分,关节镜组为75～94分.小切口组11例患者术后获6～48个月(平均15.8个月)随访.关节镜组9例患者术后获18～38个月(平均26个月)随访.两组结果全为优,优良率为100%,随访期间均无复发及并发症发牛.结论 小切口改良Bristow手术与关节镜下Bankart损伤修复手术临床效果无明显差别,均较满意,且具有手术切口小、创伤小、手术时间短等优点.前者手术易于临床普及.     

Arthroscopic autograft reconstruction of the inferior glenohumeral ligament: Exploration of technical feasibility in cadaveric shoulder specimens

Failure of primary arthroscopic Bankart repair in anterior–inferior glenohumeral instability is low, but in some cases revision surgery is required. Revision procedures show good to excellent results but typically are done open and do not respect the anatomical functionality of the joint capsule. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to explore the feasibility of a completely arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the inferior glenohumeral ligament using a hamstring autograft.     

Bankart repair in patients aged fifty years or greater: results of arthroscopic and open repairs

Currently, there is little information on the results of Bankart repairs in older patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the results, complications, and rates of revision among patients aged 50 years or greater undergoing Bankart repairs. Between 1992 and 1999, 12 Bankart repairs were performed on patients aged 50 years or greater (mean, 57 years) at our institution. Eleven patients with complete clinical records, operative reports, and minimum 3-year follow-up (mean, 6.5 years) were included in the study. All patients had shoulder instability as a result of specific trauma. Six patients underwent open repairs, and five underwent arthroscopic repairs. There were no patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. At the most recent follow-up, there were no shoulders with recurrent instability. The mean simple shoulder test score was 10.8 in the open group and 9.8 in the arthroscopic group. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 98 in the open group versus 87 in the arthroscopic group. At the most recent follow-up, mean elevation in the open group was 178 degrees versus 174 degrees in the arthroscopic group. Mean external rotation was 70 degrees in the open group and 72 degrees in the arthroscopic group. The data from this study suggest that Bankart repair in older patients is associated with a low recurrence rate, and similar results may be obtained with either open or arthroscopic procedures.