Endovascular repair for retrograde type A intramural hematoma with focal intimal disruption in descending aorta

BackgroundThis study aims to report the experience of a single center using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to treat retrograde type A intramural hematoma (IMH) with focal intimal disruption (FID) in descending aorta.MethodsA total of 24 consecutive patients with retrograde type A IMH and complicated with FID in descending aorta underwent TEVAR in our center from 2015 to 2020. Their clinical data, imaging manifestation and follow-up results were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe median age of patients was 57.9 years (range, 42–80 years) and 18 were men (75%). As the preoperative CT angiography showed, the 24 patients developed IMH complicated with different kinds of FIDs in descending aorta [5 had intramural blood pool (IBP), 15 had ulcer-like projection (ULP), 2 had penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU), and 5 had localized dissection]. Successful deployment of aortic stent graft was achieved in all patients. There was no endoleak, stent graft migration, spinal cord ischemia, stroke, or 30-day mortality observed after TEVAR. The median duration of follow-up was 30.0 months (range, 3–60 months). As the last follow-up CT angiography showed, most of the patients (23 in 24, 96%) had favorable aortic remodeling. The maximum hematoma thicknesses and maximum diameters of both ascending and descending aorta were significantly decreased. During follow-up, 1 patient developed retrograde type A aortic dissection (RAAD) and underwent open surgery 3 months after TEVAR. 1 patient died of lung cancer 2 years later. There was no aorta-related death observed.ConclusionsTEVAR provides a safe and effective treatment strategy for selected patients with retrograde type A IMH, and FID developed in descending aorta could be the possible treatment target. However, RAAD remains one of the most serious postoperative complications of concern.     

Impact of shear stress and atherosclerosis on entrance-tear formation in patients with acute aortic syndromes

Weak aortic media layers can lead to intimal tear (IT) in patients with overt aortic dissection (AD), and aortic plaque rupture is thought to progress to penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) with intramural hematoma (IMH). However, the influences of shear stress and atherosclerosis on IT and PAU have not been fully examined. Ninety-eight patients with overt AD and 30 patients with IMH and PAU admitted to our hospital from 2002 to 2007 were enrolled. The greater curvatures of the aorta, including the anterior and right portions of the ascending aorta and anterior portion of the aortic arch, were defined as sites of high shear stress. The other portions of the aorta were defined as sites of low shear stress based on anatomic and hydrodynamic theories. Aortic calcified points (ACPs) were manually counted on computed tomography slices of the whole aorta every 10 mm from the top of the arch to the abdominal bifurcation point. IT was more often observed at sites of high shear stress in overt AD than in PAU (73.5 vs 20.0 %, P < 0.0001). Significantly more ACPs were present in PAU than in overt AD (18.6 ± 8 vs 13.3 ± 10, P = 0.007). The present study suggests that high shear stress and less severe atherosclerosis could induce the occurrence of an IT, thereafter progressing to overt AD, and that low shear stress and more severe atherosclerosis could proceed to PAU with IMH. These findings may help to identify the entrance-tear site.     

Pathologic variants of thoracic aortic dissections. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers and intramural hematomas

This article confirms the existence of two variants of acute aortic pathology, the penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) and the intramural hematoma (IMH), which are radiologically distinct from classic aortic dissection. Table 4 reviews the characteristics distinguishing PAU from classic aortic dissection and IMH. We took as a matter of definition that classic aortic dissection involves a flap which traverses the aortic lumen. We defined PAU and IMH as nonflap lesions, with PAU demonstrating a crater extending from the aortic lumen into the space surrounding the aortic lumen. This categorization can be summarized with the expression, "no flap, no dissection." With these definitions made, re-review of the imaging studies for the present report identified 36 such lesions out of 214 cases originally read as aortic dissection. Therefore, these variant lesions accounted for over 1 out of 8 acute aortic pathologies. Besides confirming the existence of the conditions, PAU and IMH, as distinct radiographic lesions, this series strongly suggests that these two conditions constitute distinct clinical entities as well. Table 4 summarizes the clinical patterns of these two entities as apparent from the present study, and contrasts them with classic aortic dissections. In particular, the following observations, some of which are consonant findings in smaller series, can be made regarding the typical patient profiles of PAU and IMH from the present study: The patients with PAU and IMH are distinctly older than those with type A aortic dissection (74.0 and 73.9 versus 56.5 years, P = 0.0001). Although not statistically significant, PAU and IMH patients tend to be older than patients with type B aortic dissections as well. For PAU and IMH, unlike aortic dissection, the concentration in the elderly is manifested in a very small standard deviation of the mean age (see Fig. 13); these two entities, PAU and IMH, are essentially diseases of the seventh, eighth, and ninth decades of life. Patients with PAU and IMH are almost invariably hypertensive (about 94% of cases). The pain of PAU and IMH mimics that of classic aortic dissection, with anterior symptoms in the ascending aortic lesions and intrascapular or back pain with descending aortic lesions. Unlike classic dissection, PAU and IMH do not produce branch vessel compromise or occlusion and do not result in ischemic manifestations in the extremities or visceral organs. PAU and IMH are more focal lesions than classic aortic dissection, which frequently propagates for much or the entire extent of the thoracoabdominal aorta. PAU is uniformly associated with severe aortic arteriosclerosis and calcification, whereas classic dissection often occurs in aortas with minimal arteriosclerosis and calcification. PAU and IMH tend to occur in even larger aortas than classic aortic dissection (6.2 and 5.5 versus 5.2 cm, P = 0.01). PAU and IMH are strongly associated with AAA, which is seen concomitantly in 42.1% of PAU patients and 29.4% of IMH patients. PAU and IMH are largely diseases of the descending aorta (90% for PAU and 71% for IMH). Although our pathology data is limited, we do feel that an inherent difference in the histologic intramural level of the hematoma may underlie the pathophysiologic process that determines which patient develops a typical dissection and which develops an intramural hematoma. In particular, we feel that the level of blood collection is more superficial, closer to the adventitia, in IMH than in typical aortic dissection. This may explain why the inner layer does not prolapse into the aorta on imaging studies or when the aorta is opened in the operating room. This more superficial location would also explain the high rupture rates as compared to classic aortic dissection (Fig. 14, Table 3). We did find PAU and IMH to behave much more malignantly than typical descending aortic dissection. As seen in Figure 6, the rupture rate is much higher than for aortic dissection. Docume     

Mild Thickening of the Aortic Wall: Subtle Intramural Hematoma?

Recently published criteria for the diagnosis of intramural hematoma (IMH) of the ascending aorta by transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) include the presence of a crescent-shaped thickening of the aortic wall of more than 7 mm with an echolucent space. We report a patient whose clinical presentation suggested aortic dissection but whose TEE failed to meet the conventional criteria for such a diagnosis. TEE showed a uniform intimal thickening suspicious of IMH but less than 7 mm in thickness and with no echofree space. One week later, the patient developed frank aortic dissection. CONCLUSION: IMH can present with a subtle echo appearance. The diagnosis should not be totally discounted in the absence of a 7-mm crescentic wall thickness and an echofree space if the clinical presentation is suggestive of dissection.     

Hématome intramural de l’aorte thoracique : traitement médical ou chirurgie ?

Intramural hematoma (IMH) of the aorta is an uncommon entity. This disease shares many characteristics with acute aortic dissection. Treatment of IMH remains controversial. We report the case of a 58 years old man with hypertension disease who was admitted in emergency department with suspicion of acute aortic dissection. Transoesophageal echocardiography showed IMH involving the descending aorta which spred afterwards to the ascending aorta. Patient was treated medically and echocardiographic follow-up showed that aortic hematoma remains stable. Two years later, patient is alive and the last TEE reveals disappearance of hematoma in ascending aorta and decrease of it in descending aorta.     

Aortic intramural hematoma: Current diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations

Opinion statement Aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is an acute, potentially lethal disorder that is similar to but pathologically distinct from acute aortic dissection. Although hemorrhage into the aortic media occurs in both disorders, an intimal tear with resultant false lumen is not present in IMH. Instead, hemorrhage occurs within the aortic wall either due to rupture of the vasa vasorum or, less commonly, because of an atherosclerotic penetrating aortic ulcer. The most common risk factors associated with IMH are hypertension, atherosclerosis, and advanced age. IMH is life-threatening because the hematoma may extend along or rupture through the aorta, leading to hemothorax, cardiac tamponade, stroke, mesenteric ischemia, or renal insufficiency. Optimal treatment is still somewhat controversial; however, there is no question that hypertension must be treated effectively and immediately. This is usually best accomplished by intravenous infusion of β-blocking agents, with or without the addition of sodium nitroprusside. Recent studies support surgical treatment (ie, aortic root replacement) for IMH involving the ascending aorta, although some subsets of this population may be at lower risk and may benefit from medical therapy alone. In patients with IMH involving only the descending aorta, medical therapy alone is recommended (unless impending rupture, aortic aneurysm, or end-organ ischemia occurs). Patients who survive the acute event require intensive treatment of hypertension and frequent follow-up examinations. Because this population (especially the subset with penetrating aortic ulceration) is at high risk for aortic aneurysm and rupture, serial imaging studies of the aorta are essential.     

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair and optimal medical treatment for acute type B penetrating aortic ulcer associated with intramural hematoma

To compare the safety and efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and optimal medical treatment (OMT) for type B penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) associated with intramural hematoma (IMH). From January 2015 to December 2018, 68 consecutive patients with acute type B PAU associated with IMH were enrolled in the study. TEVAR was performed following initially OMT in 30 patients (group A), and OMT was performed in 38 patients (group B). Primary outcome was aortic-related mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, aortic-related adverse events, and complete aortic remodeling. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of patients among the 2 groups except for the depth of PAU and the thickness of IMH. Patients in group B had a significant higher risk of aortic-related mortality (13.3% vs 0%, P = .045), as the same to aortic-related adverse events during follow-up. Compared to OMT, TEVAR contributed to the favorable aortic remodeling more significantly during the mid-term follow-up (85.7% vs 18.2%, P < .001). Comparing with optimal medical repair, TEVAR for patients with PAU associated with IMH could promote the favorable aortic remolding more significantly and result in lower aortic-related mortality during mid-term follow-up. It should be considered as the first-line therapeutic option when intervention is required.     

The usefulness of contrast-enhanced echocardiography in the diagnosis and management of intramural hematoma and aortic dissection: A case report

Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) plays an important role in the diagnosis of intramural hematoma (IMH) and aortic dissection (AD), and is also necessary for the adequate management from the assessment of findings. We hereby present an interesting case in which cTTE provides additional value over contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and the morphological characterization of IMH and AD. A 58-year-old man presented to the emergency department with intermittent chest pain. After emergency consultation, an enhanced CT scan showed an acute aortic intramural hematoma involving aortic arch and descending aorta. Nevertheless, the entry tear and false lumen flow direction were identified by cTTE, which suggested an acute type B AD.     

Hematoma intramural da aorta: evolução (im)previsível?

Aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is an acute aortic syndrome characterized by bleeding into the media of the aortic wall without intimal disruption or the classic flap formation. Its natural history is variable and still poorly understood, so strategies for therapeutic management are not fully established. In some cases there is partial or complete regression of the hematoma under medical treatment, but most progress to dissection, aneurysmal dilatation or aortic rupture.The authors present the case of a 44‐year‐old hypertensive male patient admitted with a diagnosis of IMH of the descending aorta. Despite initial symptom resolution and optimal medical therapy, the IMH evolved to a pseudoaneurysm, which was successfully treated by an endovascular approach.     

Clinicopathological study on penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers and aortic dissection: distinct pattern of development of initial event

An intimal tear is responsible for the development of aortic dissection (AD). Plaque rupture is thought to progress to a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU). However, the influences of mechanical stress and atherosclerosis on the intimal tear of AD and plaque rupture of PAU have not been fully understood. We enrolled 27 patients with AD [67.6 ± 11.2 years, female/male (F/M) 12/15] and 10 patients with PAU (71.0 ± 8.64 years, F/M 2/8) who underwent aortic reconstructive surgery in our hospital between 2007 and 2011. We analyzed the clinical data and morphological features of these patients and discuss the role of mechanical stress in the initial event. On clinical examination, hypertension was frequently observed in the patients of both the AD (77.8 %) and PAU groups (90.0 %), while hypercholesterolemia was significantly more prevalent in the PAU group (90.0 %) than in the AD (22.2 %) group. Most lesions of AD (96.3 %) were found in the ascending aorta up to the aortic arch, while those of PAU (90.0 %) were found in the descending and abdominal aortas. On pathological examination, the entrance tear was found in 21 (77.8 %) of the 27 patients with AD, and histologically comprised nonatherosclerotic intima and media. In contrast, the entrance tear was considered as plaque ulcer in 8 (80.0 %) of the 10 patients with PAU. The patients with PAU showed a significantly higher prevalence of soft plaque, complicated lesions, and medial fibrosis than those with AD, whereas patients with AD showed no complicated lesions and had a significantly higher prevalence of cystic medial necrosis than those with PAU. The present study suggests that less atherosclerosis and impairment of media could proceed to intimal tear formation in AD and that the disruption of the fibrous cap could cause the plaque ulcer of PAU.     

Open Repair of Acute Type A Intramural Hematoma in 3 Patients

Acute aortic syndrome encompasses classic aortic dissection and less common aortic phenomena, including intramural hematoma (IMH), a hemorrhage within the aortic media that occurs without a discrete intimal tear. We reviewed our experience with treating acute type A IMH to better understand this acute aortic syndrome. A review of our clinical database identified 1,902 proximal aortic repairs that were performed from January 2006 through December 2018; of these, 266 were for acute aortic syndrome, including 3 (1.1%) for acute type A IMH. Operative technique varied considerably. All IMH repairs involved hemiarch or total arch replacement. In all 3 patients, the IMH extended distally into the descending thoracic aorta. There were no operative deaths or major adverse events (stroke, paraplegia, paraparesis, or renal failure necessitating dialysis) that persisted to hospital discharge. Length of hospitalization ranged from 5 to 20 days. All 3 patients were alive at follow-up (range, 2–6 yr) and needed no aortic reintervention after their index or staged repairs. In our experience, repair of acute type A IMH was infrequent and could be either simple or complex. Despite our limited experience with this disease, we found that it can be repaired successfully in urgent and emergency cases. Following treatment guidelines for aortic dissection appears to be a reasonable strategy for treating IMH.     

Penetrating atheromatous ulcer of ascending aorta: a case report and review of literature

Penetrating atherormatous ulcer (PAU) is the condition in which ulceration of an aortic atherosclerotic lesion penetrates the internal elastic lamina into the media. Penetrating atheromatous ulcers usually involve the descending thoracic aorta and are very uncommon in ascending aorta. Differentiation of PAU from other causes of Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS) such as intramural haematoma (IMH) and aortic dissection is difficult. The diagnosis of these ulcers is made on computerised tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE). Once diagnosed, PAU of ascending aorta should be treated surgically on emergency basis. We report on a patient of penetrating atherosclerotic aortic ulcer in ascending aorta with a review of the natural history, imaging diagnosis and management of the condition. She underwent ascending aortic interposition graft using 26mm Dacron graft successfully.     

Ulcer of the thoracic aorta: diagnosis, therapy and prognosis

Penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) result from progressive erosion of atheromatose plaques perforating the internal elastic lamina. PAU is considered both a predisposing condition and differential diagnosis of classic aortic dissection; 93 cases of PAU are documented in the world literature, 60% of which are male over 60 years old. Systemic hypertension was prevalent in 85%, history of smoking in 72%, hyperlipoproteinemia in 35%, and diabetes mellitus in 31%. In 61%, PAU was associated with coronary artery disease, in 53% with abdominal or thoracic aortic aneurysm, in 31% with chronic renal insufficiency, in 17% with peripheral artery disease, and in 12% with a history of cerebrovascular accidents. In 73%, PAU was associated with formation of medial hematoma and in 16% with a thick, calcified intimal flap of less than 10 cm extent. Angiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and transesophageal echocardiography were used in 66, 64, 23 and 14%, respectively, for diagnosing PAU; sensitivities for demonstrating PAU were 83, 65, 86 and 61%, respectively. Chest or back pain was found in 76% and an acute onset of symptoms in 68%. Signs of mediastinal widening were found in 59%, neurologic signs comprising hoarseness, syncope or coma in 8%, pulse differentials caused by embolism in 4%, aortic regurgitation in 7%, and mediastinal hematoma, pleural- or pericardial effusion in 42, 27 and 10%, respectively. PAU of the ascending aorta or aortic arch (type A) leads to dissection and rupture in 57%, compared to 12% and 5%, respectively, in the descending aorta (type B); 57% of medically managed type A PAU patients died within 30 d of hospital admission compared to only 14% of type B PAU with 20 cases of uncomplicated long-term outcome without surgery. Thus, similar to the Stanford classification for aortic dissection, type A PAU should primarily be considered for surgical management, whereas type B PAU without signs of instability may be managed medically.     

Different clinical features of aortic intramural hematoma versus dissection involving the descending thoracic aorta

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the absence of flow communication in aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) involving the descending aorta may have a different clinical course compared with aortic dissection (AD). METHODS: We prospectively evaluated clinical and echocardiographic data in AD (76 patients) and IMH (27 patients) of the descending thoracic aorta. RESULTS: Patients did not differ with regard to age, gender, or clinical presentation. IMH and AD had the same predictors of complications at follow-up: aortic diameter (>5 cm) at diagnosis and persistent back pain. Surgical treatment was more frequently selected in AD (39% vs. 22%, P < 0.01) and AD patients who underwent surgical treatment had higher mortality than those with IMH (36% vs. 17%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in mortality with medical treatment (14% in AD vs. 19% in IMH, P = 0.7). During follow-up, of 23 patients with IMH, 11 (47%) showed complete resolution or regression, 6 (26%) increased the diameter of the descending aorta, and typical AD developed in 3 patients (13%). No changes occurred in 14% of the group. Three-year survival rate did not show significant differences between both groups (82 +/- 6% in IMH vs. 75 +/- 7% in AD, P = 0.37). CONCLUSION: IMH of the descending thoracic aorta has a relatively frequent rate of complications at follow-up, including dissection and aneurysm formation. Medical treatment with very frequent imaging and timed elective surgery in cases with complications allows a better patient management.     

Application of thoracic endovascular dissecting aneurysm repair for secondary type B aortic dissection

Type A aortic dissection is an emergency condition that requires immediate surgery. Graft replacement of the ascending aorta is the main treatment for this disorder. However, after ascending aortic replacement, the dissection flap may progress to the distal side (to the descending aorta) and a new intimal tear may develop. In this study, we report on a 66-year-old woman who had a history of ascending aortic replacement six months earlier. She was admitted to hospital with a new onset of back pain. Computed tomography revealed a new dissection tear originating from the distal side of the subclavian artery orifice. Thoracic endovascular dissecting aneurysm repair (TEVDAR) was carried out on the patient. Additional complications were not observed in the postoperative period. Complete cure was provided and the patient was discharged on the fourth day after the operation. TEVDAR may be safe and effective in preventing progression of the aortic flap and the formation of a new intimal tear in type A aortic dissections. Optional hybrid interventions could ameliorate the outcomes in aortic dissection cases.     

Echocardiographic Findings Mimicking Type A Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND: Type A aortic dissection is a rare, but life-threatening disease. The prognosis is determined by an accurate and immediate diagnosis. CASE STUDY: A patient with suspected type A dissection based on outward transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings is reported. Renewed TEE showed dilation of the ascending aorta with pronounced wall thickness. A membrane-like structure was found in the ascending aorta. M-mode technique revealed movement of the suspected membrane that was partially in parallel to the aortic wall. Thus, there were severe doubts on the presence of type A dissection. By contrast, typical intimal rupture was found in the descending aorta. Computed tomography (CT) and angiography showed aortic dilation and an extended wall hematoma deriving from the entry at the descending part. There was no evidence of type A dissection. CONCLUSION: TEE is a noninvasive diagnostic tool to assess aortic dissection of type A with a sensitivity of 90-98% that is equal to CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) solely. Complementary use of CT or MRI could improve the diagnostic accuracy. False-positive findings could result from echocardiographic artifacts concealing an intimal flap in the ascending aorta. Echo reverberations in dilated or calcified aortas had been judged to account for this phenomenon. In the present case, it could be assumed that the extended wall hematoma in accordance with vessel dilation mimicked the membrane-like structure. Oscillation or flutter of the suspicious intimal flap independently of aortal wall movement seem to be mandatory to avoid false-positive diagnoses. Ancillary findings such as flow signals, intimal fenestration or thrombosis are helpful to enhance the diagnostic specificity of TEE.     

Rapid progression of discrete type A intramural hematoma: prevention of a "procedure-related" complication by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.

PURPOSE: To report a case illustrating the utility of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before planned stent-graft placement for chronic type B aortic dissection. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old man with acute aortic syndrome and an 8-year-old interposition graft in the distal aortic arch for acute type B dissection was referred for dissection of the descending thoracic aorta down to the aortic bifurcation; the false lumen was dilated to 65 mm and was partially thrombosed. The ascending aorta showed discrete, eccentric, 4-mm wall thickening that was not considered clinically significant. Stent-graft closure of the entry tear in the proximal descending thoracic aorta was elected. However, as the endovascular procedure was about to commence, TEE showed striking eccentric thickening of the aortic wall of up to 18 mm. The endovascular procedure was stopped, as it was decided to urgently replace the ascending aorta. The next day, the patient underwent successful ascending aortic replacement and simultaneous antegrade stent-graft implantation over the descending thoracic aortic entry tear via the open aortic arch. The postoperative course was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged 19 days after surgery. He remains well at 6 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our case demonstrates that dissection of the ascending aorta may occur not only due to endograft-induced intimal injury, but may also occur due to underlying but undiagnosed or underestimated disease of the ascending aorta or arch. Besides procedural guidance, intraoperative TEE is a useful tool to detect such disease to avoid subsequent "procedure-related" complications.     

Intramural hematoma of the arch and ascending aorta owing to acute aortic syndrome of the descending aorta: to stent or not to stent?

Purpose: To report thoracic stent-graft repair in patients with acute aortic syndromes, an intramural hematoma (IMH), and intractable pain despite maximum medical therapy. Case Reports: Since January 2002, 4 patients [2 men (40 and 53 years old) and 2 woman (62 and 83 years old)] with type B aortic dissection have presented with an IMH >3 mm in the aortic arch. The patients were treated with a "freeflo" Valiant thoracic stent-graft, which was deployed under "zero aortic pressure" using either adenosine arrest or rapid ventricular pacing. To enhance false lumen thrombosis, a distal extension was inserted when a significant re-entry was observed in the mid third of the descending thoracic. The procedures were successful; over a follow-up ranging to 17 months, the patients have been asymptomatic, with resolution of all the IMHs. Conclusion: Thoracic stent-graft treatment of acute aortic syndromes of the descending aorta complicated by arch IMH is feasible. Success of the procedure may rely on optimal stent-graft selection with minimal graft oversizing, deployment under "zero aortic pressure" using rapid ventricular pacing, and more liberal revascularization of the left subclavian artery.     

Prognostic value of estimated glomerular filtration rate and presence of proteinuria in type B aortic intramural hematoma

BackgroundAlthough aggressive medical treatment is recommended in patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma (IMH), a variety of aortic events can occur during the later period. For early identification of these patients, the present study was aimed at evaluating the prognostic validity of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the presence of proteinuria in type B aortic IMH.MethodsData of 61 patients with type B IMH in Peking University People’s Hospital from January 2008 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected. The serum creatinine level and urine protein levels were measured at admission. And eGFR were calculated by the CKD-EPI equation. Adverse aortic-related events were defined as a composite of satisfaction of criteria for surgical conversion (with or without actual surgical intervention) and death from aortic rupture.ResultsInitial eGFR was significantly different between patients with adverse aortic-related events and those without (P=0.003). On multivariate analysis, eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m² (OR, 8.726; 95% CI: 1.711–46.144; P=0.009) and ULP (OR, 17.516; 95% CI: 3.322–92.258; P=0.001) were independent predictors of adverse aorta-related events. Furthermore, eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m² and proteinuria (+) (OR, 8.344; P=0.030) had significantly greater rates of aortic-related events. In addition, eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m² and proteinuria (+) had incremental prognostic value (C-statistic, 0.860, P=0.039) compared with ulcer-like projection (C-statistic, 0.815) alone.ConclusionsInitial eGFR and presence of proteinuria were able to provide incremental prognostic information in addition to ulcer-like projection in patients with type B aortic IMH.     

主动脉夹层54例16层螺旋CT表现特征及其解剖、病理基础

目的明确主动脉夹层的16层螺旋CT及其图像后处理（即三维重建）的影像表现特征与其解剖、病理基础的相关性。方法54例经临床影像证实的主动脉夹层患者（典型夹层42例,壁内血肿12例）行16层螺旋CT平扫、增强扫描及三维重建。重点观察和评价夹层真假腔、内膜片、内膜破口以及重要分支血管的受累情况。结果（1）42例夹层真假腔、内膜片、内膜破口的显示率分别为100％、100％、97．6％。夹层真假腔及内膜片呈螺旋形走行41例（97．6％）。左肾动脉及右髂总动脉最易受夹层累及,均为20例（47．6％）。（2）12例壁内血肿、无内膜撕裂,10例（83．3％）平扫表现为主动脉壁呈新月形或环形稍高密度影,2例（16．7％）呈低密度改变;增强扫描均无强化。12例壁内血肿合并穿通性溃疡9例（75％）。结论16层螺旋CT横断面及其三维图像,能快速、准确显示主动脉夹层的病理解剖改变,为临床提供精细信息,对治疗方案的选择具有重要临床实用价值。