不同设计人工晶状体植入术后3年后囊膜混浊的研究

目的研究不同材料和不同设计的人工晶状体植入术后3年的后囊膜混浊(posterior capsular opacification,PCO)发生率及PCO形态。方法回顾性研究132眼老年性白内障患者,由同一医生进行超声乳化联合人工晶状体(in-traocular lens,IOL)植入术,根据IOL的不同分为4组:Storz Hydroview H60M组(33眼),Silicone折叠式硅胶IOL组(29眼),AcrySof三片式IOL组(36眼)和聚甲基丙稀酸甲酯(poly-methyl methacrylate,PMMA)组(34眼)。术后3年随访患眼的最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity,BCVA),扩瞳后采集PCO数码图像,分析不同IOL组PCO的形态及PCO发生率。结果各种IOL的PCO形态各异,H60M组和AcrySof组分别有10眼和15眼后囊形成皱折,而Silicone和PMMA组为片状混浊。虽然各组BCVA和BCVA下降率差异没有显著性(P>0.05),但PCO发生率差异有非常显著性,分别是AcySof组5.6%,Silicone组30.3%,H60M组31%和PMMA组55.9%。结论AcrySof疏水丙烯酸酯三片式折叠IOL,有直角边缘设计,术后3年能明显降低PCO的发生。     

Posterior capsule opacification and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates after implantation of silicone,hydrogel and soft acrylic intraocular lenses: a two-year follow-up study

PURPOSE: To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy rates associated with three different posterior chamber foldable intraocular lenses (IOL). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the rates of PCO and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in 1150 eyes two years after standard phacoemulsification with a no-stitch 3.5mm clear corneal incision (CCI) and in-the-bag implantation of one of three types of IOL: 190 eyes received a one-piece round-edged hydrogel IOL (Hydroview H60M, Bausch & Lomb); 475 eyes a three-piece round-edged silicone IOL (AMO PhacoFlex SI-40NB, Allergan); 485 eyes a three-piece square-edged soft acrylic lens (AcrySof MA60MA, Alcon). RESULTS: The PCO and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates were respectively 43.15% and 20.5% in the Hydroview H60M group, 27.57% and 9.68% in the AMO PhacoFlex SI-40NB group, 10.5% and 2.47% in the AcrySof MA60MA group. CONCLUSIONS: PCO and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates were significantly higher in the Hydroview H60M group and significantly lower with the AcrySof MA60MA lenses, which combine a bioactive constitutive material with the square-edged optic design.     

Results of hydrophilic acrylic,hydrophobic acrylic,and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs) in eyes with uveitis. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 72 eyes with uveitis and 68 control eyes having phacoemulsification and IOL implantation by 1 surgeon. Patients received 1 of the following IOLs: foldable hydrophilic acrylic (Hydroview, Bausch & Lomb), hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof, Alcon), or silicone (CeeOn 911, Pharmacia). Postoperative evaluations were at 1, 3, and 7 days and 1, 3, and 6 months. Cell reaction was evaluated by specular microscopy of the anterior IOL surface and the anterior and posterior capsule reaction, by biomicroscopy. RESULTS: Small round cell deposition was observed on all IOLs in the immediate postoperative period, especially in eyes with uveitis. This reaction decreased 3 to 6 months after surgery. Although the CeeOn 911 had a higher mean grade of small cells, there was no statistical difference between the 3 IOL types after 6 months in the uveitis and control groups. Foreign-body giant cells (FBGCs) increased after 1 week to 1 month. The AcrySof IOLs had the highest number of FBGCs; after 6 months, there was a statistically significant difference between the AcrySof and Hydroview uveitis groups (P =.036) and the AcrySof and CeeOn 911 uveitis groups (P =.003) but there was no difference among the 3 IOL types in the control group. Lens epithelial cell outgrowth persisted on the Hydroview IOLs in control eyes and regressed on all 3 IOL types in uveitic eyes and on the AcrySof and CeeOn 911 IOLs in control eyes (P =.0001). Anterior capsule opacification (ACO) was more severe on all IOL types in uveitic eyes and on the CeeOn 911 IOL in control eyes. Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was more severe in uveitic eyes. The Hydroview group had more severe PCO than the AcrySof and the CeeOn 911 groups in uveitis and control eyes. Six months postoperatively, the difference was significant (P =.0001). There was no significant difference between the AcrySof and CeeOn 911 IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular lens biocompatibility is inversely related to inflammation. Hydrophilic acrylic material had good uveal but worse capsular biocompatibility. Hydrophobic acrylic material had lower uveal but better capsular biocompatibility. Silicone showed a higher small cell count (mild) and more severe ACO but achieved PCO results comparable to FBGC results and better than those with the AcrySof lens 6 months after surgery. Despite the differences in IOL biocompatibility, all patients benefited from the surgery.     

Cellular reaction on the anterior surface of 4 types of intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To assess the cellular reaction on the anterior surface of 4 types of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: One hundred eyes scheduled for cataract surgery were prospectively randomized into 4 groups of 25 eyes each using random number tables. Group 1 received a Hydroview IOL (Bausch & Lomb), Group 2 an AcrySof IOL (Alcon), Group 3 a MemoryLens IOL (ORC), and Group 4 a CeeOn 920 IOL (Pharmacia). Patients were examined 1, 3, 7, 30, 90, and 180 days postoperatively. Postoperative biomicroscopic examinations were done with a slitlamp, and a specular microscope was used to document the presence of cell deposits and identify areas with the highest density of cells. RESULTS: The local tissue response revealed 2 patterns: a nonspecific foreign-body reaction to the IOL (small round, fibroblast-like, epithelioid, and giant cells) and a lens epithelial cell (LEC) reaction. The highest incidence of LECs was in the Hydroview group, in which LECs were present on 81.8% of lenses 180 days postoperatively. During the first postoperative days, small round and fibroblast-like cells were found on all IOLs. From 7 days on, the incidence and density of these cells were less severe in the Hydroview and CeeOn 920 groups. After several weeks, epithelioid cells and foreign-body giant cells were seen on some IOLs. These cells appeared more often on AcrySof, MemoryLens, and CeeOn IOLs. CONCLUSION: This study found IOL-related differences in cellular reaction after cataract surgery. The incidence of a nonspecific foreign-body reaction to 4 IOLs is consistent with the results of previous studies. The incidence of LECs was highest in the Hydroview group and lowest in the AcrySof group. The CeeOn 920 group had the lowest incidence of all types of cells.     

Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term response of 6 types of 3-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) by assessing the cellular reaction on the anterior IOL surface, the behavior of posterior and anterior capsule fibrosis, and flare. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: One hundred eighty eyes were prospectively randomized to receive 1 of 6 IOLs: hydrophilic acrylic Hydroview (Bausch & Lomb) or MemoryLens (ORC); hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof MA60BM (Alcon) or AMO Sensar AR40 (Allergan); hydrophobic silicone CeeOn 920 or CeeOn 911A (Pharmacia). The patients had standardized cataract surgery, postoperative medication, and follow-up. One year after surgery, 155 eyes were assessed. The cellular reaction was evaluated by specular microscopy of the anterior IOL surface. Anterior and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was assessed semiquantitatively by biomicroscopy. Flare was measured with a Kowa FC-1000 laser flare-cell meter. RESULTS: Regarding uveal biocompatibility, the hydrophobic acrylic IOLs showed the highest incidence of late foreign-body cell reaction (AcrySof, 30%; AR40, 17%) followed by the hydrophilic acrylic (MemoryLens, 8%; Hydroview, 4%) and silicone (CeeOn 920, 4%; CeeOn 911A, 0%) (P =.0044). In all cases, the cellular reaction was low grade and clinically insignificant. Regarding capsular biocompatibility, some eyes developed lens epithelial cell (LEC) outgrowth on the anterior IOL surface. The highest incidence was in the hydrophilic acrylic group (Hydroview, 85%; MemoryLens, 27%) followed by the hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof, 4%; AR40, 3%). No silicone IOL had LECs on the anterior surface. The difference among IOL groups was significant (P =.0001). Anterior capsule opacification was more predominant in the hydrophobic IOL groups. Posterior capsule opacification of the central 3.0 mm area was lowest in the groups with a sharp-edged optic (CeeOn 911A, AcrySof) followed by the round-edged silicone (CeeOn 920), hydrophobic acrylic (AR40), and hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (P =.0001). There was a significant difference in flare between the AR40 lens and the Hydroview, MemoryLens, CeeOn 911A, and CeeOn 920 (P <.004). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative cell count at 1 year. The power calculation showed that the sample size was sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in cellular reaction, although clinically mild in normal eyes, indicate that there were more giant cells with hydrophobic acrylic IOLs and an increased tendency toward LEC outgrowth with hydrophilic lenses. The incidence of PCO was lowest in the hydrophobic IOL groups, especially in groups with a sharp-edged optic. Second-generation silicone IOLs with a sharp edge had good uveal and capsular biocompatibility 1 year after surgery.     

Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of 2 foldable acrylic intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis or pseudoexfoliation syndrome: comparison to a control group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic (Hydroview) and hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof) intraocular lenses (IOLs) after phacoemulsification in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) or uveitis and compare the results with those in a control group. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.METHODS: This prospective nonrandomized comparative trial comprised 143 eyes recruited consecutively. Of these, 49 eyes had PEX, 43 had uveitis, and 51 served as controls. A standardized surgical protocol was used. Cell reaction, anterior (ACO) and posterior (PCO) capsule opacification, and flare were evaluated 1 year after cataract surgery. RESULTS: Regarding uveal biocompatibility, the number of foreign-body giant cells (FBGCs) increased in proportion to associated ocular pathologies in both IOL groups. The difference between the Hydroview control and Hydroview uveitis groups was statistically significant. The number of FBGCs was greater on AcrySof IOLs than on Hydroview IOLs in all 3 groups. The difference in FBGCs between the 2 IOL types was statistically significant in the control and PEX groups. Regarding capsular biocompatibility, lens epithelial cell (LEC) outgrowth was inversely correlated with intraocular inflammation. Outgrowth was statistically significantly higher with Hydroview IOLs, occurring in 85% in the control group, 45% in the PEX group, and 28% in the uveitis group (P <.0001). With AcrySof lenses, the percentages were 0%, 8%, and 4%, respectively. The PEX and uveitis groups were more likely to develop ACO than the control group (P <.012). There was no statistically significant difference in ACO between the 2 IOL types in the 3 patient groups. The PCO was statistically significantly greater in the uveitis group than in the control group (P <.026) and statistically significantly more dense on Hydroview than on AcrySof IOLs in all 3 patient groups (P <.002). Flare was statistically significantly higher in the uveitis group than in the PEX and control groups with both IOL types (P <.012). There was no statistically significant difference in flare between the 2 IOL types. CONCLUSIONS: Uveal and capsular biocompatibility depends on the intensity of ocular inflammation. The greater the inflammation, the less the biocompatibility of hydrophilic and hydrophobic acrylic materials. AcrySof stimulated more FBGCs. The Hydroview material had better uveal but poorer capsular biocompatibility than AcrySof. The sharp optic edge effect of the AcrySof IOL and the advantages of the Hydroview lens in normal eyes are less apparent in compromised eyes.     

不同材料和不同设计的人工晶状体对后囊膜混浊的预防作用比较

目的比较三组不同材料、不同设计的一片式折叠人工晶状体(IOL)在预防后囊膜混浊(PCO)中的作用。方法疏水丙烯酸材料直角边缘组(AcrySof)52眼,亲水丙烯酸材料直角边缘组(ISO)40眼,亲水丙烯酸材料非直角边缘组(Hydroview)32眼,术后12个月扩瞳观察前囊膜混浊(ACO)和PCO的情况并进行统计学分析。结果术后12个月PCO发生率AcrySof组明显低于Hydroview组,ISO组介于二者之间,差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01);而ACO的发生率三组比较,差异无显著统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论光学边缘锐利的疏水丙烯酸材料折叠式IOL可以更有效地减少PCO的发生。     

Posterior capsule opacification and neodymium: YAG capsulotomy rates with AcrySof acrylic and PhacoFlex II silicone intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence and severity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between AcrySof(R) MA30BA acrylic (Alcon) and PhacoFlex(R) II SI-40NB silicone (AMO) intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Outpatient Cataract Surgery Center, TLC Eyecare and Laser Center, Jackson, Michigan, USA. METHODS: AcrySof and PhacoFlex II IOLs were implanted in fellow eyes of 156 patients requiring bilateral cataract extraction. The patients were followed for a mean of approximately 3 years for the incidence and severity of PCO and the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates. RESULTS: Of the 63 eyes that were free of PCO throughout the study, 42 had the AcrySof IOL and 21 had the PhacoFlex II IOL. Of eyes that developed PCO, the mean severity in the AcrySof group was 16% less than that in the PhacoFlex II group. Of the 50 eyes that had an Nd:YAG capsulotomy, 17 were in the AcrySof group and 33 were in the PhacoFlex II group. All differences between groups were statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSION: The AcrySof MA30BA IOL was associated with less PCO proliferation and thus fewer Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomies than the PhacoFlex II SI-40NB IOL.     

Posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification: silicone CeeOn Edge versus acrylate AcrySof intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To compare the rates and morphologic features of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after small-incision phacoemulsification and in-the-bag implantation of 2 foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) over an 18-month follow-up. SETTING: Departments of Ophthalmology, Hospital of Conegliano, Conegliano, and Maggiore Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. METHODS: In an open clinical study, 78 cataract patients were randomly selected to have implantation of a silicone CeeOn Edge (Pharmacia) or acrylate AcrySof (Alcon) IOL after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. All the patients were operated on using a standard technique and in-the-bag IOL implantation. One eye in each patient was studied. Morphologic evaluation of PCO was performed using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification software. RESULTS: At 18 months in the CeeOn Edge group, 36 eyes (90%) had a clear posterior capsule and 4 (10%) had PCO that did not affect visual acuity. In the AcrySof group, 26 eyes (68%) had a clear posterior capsule, 11 (29%) had PCO that did not affect visual acuity, and 1 (3%) had PCO with a decrease of 2 or more lines of visual acuity that required a neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy. No eye developed Elschnig pearls or stretched folds in the bag. The postoperative best corrected visual acuity ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 in 96% in the CeeOn Edge group and in 92% in the AcrySof group. No IOL haze or discoloration was observed in the CeeOn Edge group. Mild IOL decentration and tilting occurred in 4 AcrySof eyes; however, no glistenings were found any AcrySof IOL. CONCLUSIONS: Both the CeeOn Edge and AcrySof groups had a low incidence of PCO after an 18-month follow-up. The CeeOn Edge group had significantly less PCO than the AcrySof group. These results confirm that IOLs with square truncated edges create a barrier effect at the optic edge, reducing the overall incidence of PCO.     

Posterior capsule opacification 3 years after implantation of an AcrySof and a MemoryLens in fellow eyes

PURPOSE: To compare the rates of lens epithelial cell (LEC) migration and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) 1 and 3 years after sutureless small incision phacoemulsification and in-the-bag implantation of 2 acrylic polymer intraocular lenses (IOLs)-the AcrySof and MemoryLens-in fellow eyes of patients. SETTING: Eye Clinic, Beyo?lu Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: Fifty patients with no systemic or ocular problems that would interfere with postoperative visual acuity were included in this prospective study. Each patient had in-the-bag implantation of an AcrySof IOL in 1 eye and a MemoryLens in the fellow eye in a randomized fashion after uneventful phacoemulsification through a sutureless clear corneal incision. RESULTS: At 1 year (n = 32 patients), there was no significant difference between fellow eyes in postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and contrast sensitivity. In the MemoryLens group, 10 eyes (31.3%) had PCO and 9 (28.1%), LEC migration. In the AcrySof group, no eye had PCO and 2 eyes (6.3%) had LEC migration (P <.001). At 3 years (n = 21 patients), 1 eye (4.7%) in the AcrySof group had PCO and 3 eyes (14.4%) had LEC migration without PCO. In the MemoryLens group, 1 eye (4.7%) had a clear posterior capsule, 11 eyes (52.4%) had LEC migration, and 9 eyes (42.9%) had PCO (P <.001). A neodymium:YAG capsulotomy was required in 4 eyes (19.0%) in the MemoryLens group but no eye in the AcrySof group. At 3 years, BCVA was lower in the MemoryLens group than in the AcrySof group (P <.05). CONCLUSION: The 3 year clinical data of fellow eyes indicate that the AcrySof IOL causes less PCO than the MemoryLens.     

Posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification: foldable acrylic versus poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To study the effects of foldable acrylic and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation on posterior capsule opacification (PCO). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey. METHODS: This consecutive series comprised 157 eyes having phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable acrylic IOL with rectangular optic edges and a 5.5 mm optic (AcrySof) (n = 80 eyes) or a PMMA IOL with rounded optic edges and 5.5 mm optic (n = 77). Evaluated were incidence, location, and degree of PCO. Mean postoperative follow-up was 17.8 months +/- 1.7 (SD) (range 16 to 22 months). RESULTS: Posterior capsule opacification occurred in 8.7% of eyes in the foldable acrylic IOL group and in 24.7% of eyes in the PMMA IOL group. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < .01). Centrally located PCO was significantly lower in the acrylic group (P < .01). There were 3 eyes with severe PCO in the PMMA group and none in the acrylic group. Anterior capsule contraction and fibrosis were present in 4 eyes in the PMMA group but none in the acrylic group. Soemmering's ring cataract formation was detected in 3 eyes, all with the AcrySof IOL. CONCLUSION: In addition to its optic material and rectangular optic edges, the AcrySof IOL provides additional advantages in lowering the incidence of PCO compared with rounded-edge PMMA IOLs.     

Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of CeeOn Edge 911A, PhacoFlex SI-40NB, and AcrySof MA60BM lenses: one-year results of an intraindividual comparison multicenter study

PURPOSE: To perform an intraindividual comparison of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with 2 foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) and a foldable acrylic IOL 1 year after in-the-bag implantation. SETTINGS: Seven German ophthalmology centers. METHODS: In an open prospective randomized multicenter study, each center intraindividually compared a high-refractive-index, sharp-edged optic silicone IOL (CeeOn Edge 911A, Pharmacia) with a high-refractive-index, round-edged optic silicone IOL (PhacoFlex SI-40NB, Allergan) or a sharp-edged optic acrylic IOL (AcrySof MA60BM, Alcon). Of 288 randomized patients, 247 had standard phacoemulsification with in-the-bag IOL implantation in both eyes by the same surgeon. One eye of each patient received a CeeOn Edge IOL and the fellow eye, an AcrySof or PhacoFlex IOL. A morphologic evaluation of PCO was performed using the Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) system 1 to 2 weeks and 11 to 14 months after surgery. The digital pictures were evaluated by an independent investigator who was blind to the type of IOL. Intraindividual differences in EPCO scores were statistically evaluated by a 1-sided binomial test at an alpha-level of 5%. RESULTS: One year after surgery, 127 patients with the AcrySof IOL and 102 patients with the PhacoFlex IOL in the control eye were reexamined. Functional results, safety, and handling were not significantly different between the 3 IOLs. All reexamined eyes had a very low PCO grade. The EPCO values revealed less PCO in eyes with the CeeOn Edge IOL than in eyes with the AcrySof or PhacoFlex IOL, but the difference was not statistically significant. A neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy was performed in 1 eye with a CeeOn Edge IOL, 1 eye with an AcrySof IOL, and 2 eyes with a PhacoFlex IOL. CONCLUSIONS: The EPCO PCO grade was low 1 year after implantation of CeeOn Edge 911A, PhacoFlex SI-40NB, and AcrySof MA60BM IOLs; there was no statistically significant difference between the IOLs. The impact of IOL material and edge design on PCO development might be relevant in a long-term follow-up of this study.     

Comparison of the biocompatibility of 2 foldable intraocular lenses with sharp optic edges.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical performance of 2 foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) with sharp optic edges in terms of uveal and capsular biocompatibility. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: Fifty eyes scheduled for cataract surgery were included in this comparative study. A standardized surgical protocol was used, and all operations were performed by 1 experienced surgeon. Two posterior chamber lens types of similar design with a 6.0 mm sharp-edged optic and poly(methyl methacrylate) haptics were used. Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof acrylic IOL (Alcon), and 25 eyes received a CeeOn 911A silicone IOL (Pharmacia). Relevant data were collected at a 3-year follow-up examination. To evaluate uveal biocompatibility, anterior chamber laser flare and cell measurements and inflammatory cell reactions were monitored. Cellular biocompatibility was investigated by examining anterior capsule opacification (ACO), posterior capsule opacification (PCO), and lens epithelial cell (LEC) ongrowth on the IOL's anterior surface. Factors such as intralenticular glistenings and IOL decentration were also evaluated. RESULTS: Anterior chamber flare and cells and the inflammatory cell reaction were significantly lower in the CeeOn 911A group. There was no statistically significant difference in ACO, PCO, and LEC ongrowth between the 2 groups. The AcrySof lenses showed significantly better centration and a higher density of intralenticular glistening. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that a sharp-edged optic design is, to date, the most effective method of reducing the rate of PCO. Despite a subclinical foreign-body reaction in the AcrySof group, both lenses had a high degree of capsular and uveal biocompatibility.     

Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates following implantation of square-edged intraocular lenses: polymethyl methacrylate versus silicone versus acrylic

Objective: To study the influence of square-edged intraocular lenses (lOLs) on the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and the requirement for laser capsulotomy.Design: Retrospective study.Participants: Three hundred seventy-seven eyes of 377 patients were included.Methods: All these patients underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of square polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Aurolab), silicone (Tecnis Z9000), acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof MA60AC and Sensar Optiedge), or acrylic hydrophilic (Akreos Adapt) lOLs with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Only those cases in which Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy had been performed for visually significant PCO were evaluated.Results: Three hundred seventy-seven eyes of 377 patients were included in the study. Follow-up duration ranged from 24 to 54 (mean 40.27, SD 8.42) months. The incidence of PCO requiring Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy was found to be significantly less in the silicone lens group: 1.4% as compared with an incidence of 11.7% in the PMMA lens group (p = 0.018). In the square-edged acrylic group, visually significant PCO requiring Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy was observed in 3.6%, 4.8%, and 6.8% of eyes implanted with AcrySof MA60AC, Sensar Optiedge, and Akreos Adapt lOLs, respectively. In 5 of the 7 eyes (71.4%) exhibiting PCO in the PMMA group, the condition developed within the first 6 months. In the silicone and acrylic group, development of PCO was delayed.Conclusions: The rate of visually significant PCO as well as the need for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy is influenced by IOL biomaterial in addition to square edge. It is significantly delayed with square-edged foldable acrylic and silicone lOLs compared with square-edged PMMA IOLs.     

Course of postoperative inflammation after implantation of 4 types of foldable intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare the course of postoperative inflammation after small incision cataract surgery with implantation of 4 types of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Vienna, Austria. METHODS: One hundred twenty eyes were prospectively randomized to receive a foldable silicone (Pharmacia 920), hydrogel (Bausch & Lomb Hydroview), methyl methacrylate/hydroxyethyl methacrylate (Mentor MemoryLens), or acrylic (Alcon AcrySof) IOL. All surgery was performed by the same experienced surgeon using a standardized surgical protocol: clear corneal incision, capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification, and in-the-bag implantation of the IOL. All patients received standardized postoperative medication and follow-up. Postoperative inflammation was evaluated by measuring aqueous flare preoperatively and 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 90, and 180 days after surgery using the Kowa 1000 laser flare-cell meter. RESULTS: Except on the first day after surgery, when the AcrySof group had higher flare values than the other groups (P = .0265), no significant differences were found up to 6 months. Re-establishment of the blood-aqueous barrier was similar in eyes with the AcrySof, Hydroview, and MemoryLens IOLs; the course of postoperative inflammation was different in eyes with the silicone IOL. CONCLUSION: Comparison of postoperative flare values after implantation of 4 foldable IOLs showed no clinically relevant differences in the course of postoperative inflammation.     

Predicting posterior capsule opacification: value of early retroillumination imaging

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of early retroillumination imaging of the posterior capsule in predicting the eventual development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, and Department of Physics, King's College, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: All patients with retroillumination images of the posterior capsule taken 6 months and 2 years after uneventful phacoemulsification with in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were selected. The images were taken using the same hardware and analyzed with the same software to calculate the percentage area of the posterior capsule covered by lens epithelial cells. The percentage area of PCO with all IOL types 6 months postoperatively was correlated with that at 2 years. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients had analyzable images at 6 months and 2 years. Of these, 63 had a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (Pharmacia 812A or Storz P497UV), 33 an acrylic (Alcon AcrySof MA30 or SA30), 22 a silicone (Allergan SI-30), and 22 a hydrophilic acrylic (Bausch & Lomb Hydroview H60). The correlation of the percentage area of PCO at 6 months with that at 2 years resulted in an r value of 0.71 (P <.0001) in the entire group. The r value was 0.48 in the PMMA group and 0.86 in the foldable IOL group (P <.0001) (r value: AcrySof, 0.66; silicone, 0.82; Hydroview, 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Retroillumination imaging of the posterior capsule 6 months after cataract surgery predicted the PCO outcome at 2 years in eyes with foldable IOLs.     

两种AcrySof折叠式人工晶体植入后囊膜混浊的临床研究

目的：观察两种设计不同的AcrySof丙烯酸酯折叠式人工晶体(intraocular lens,IOL)对晶状体后囊膜混浊(posterior capsule opacification,PCO)的影响。方法：114例(114只眼)随机分为两组(1)试验组：59例(59眼)，植入一体式AcrySof折叠式IOL。(2)对照组：55例(55眼)，植入三体式AcrySof折叠式IOL。术后半年散大瞳孔观察Soemmering环和PCD情况。结果：瞳孔区PCD，试验组4只眼(6．8％)，混浊多为轻微皱褶。对照组11只限(20％)，试验组PCD明显少于对照组，差异有显著意义(P＜0．05)。两组术后Soemmering环边界均清晰而试验组更加明显，且撵周也形成明显的细胞增殖区。结论：一体式AcrySof折叠IOL具有独特设计的襻使晶状体后囊膜皱褶大为减少，远期PCO明显下降。     

Lens epithelial cell layer formation related to hydrogel foldable intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of postoperative lens epithelial cell (LEC) layer formation anterior to the Hydroview hydrogel foldable intraocular lens (IOL), the effect on vision, and the appearance under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SETTING: Eye Unit of a district general hospital, Delfzijl, and the Laboratory for Cell Biology and Electron Microscopy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. METHODS: In the prospective study, 207 eyes that received a Hydroview hydrogel foldable IOL during 1996 were followed for almost 2 years (range 8 to 98 weeks). Eleven eyes had follow-up of fewer than 8 weeks and were excluded. Some eyes had a transparent to milky-white membrane anterior to the IOL in the plane of capsulorhexis. In the absence of other contributing factors, if best corrected visual acuity was worse than expected, it was assumed to be caused by the membrane. Depending on the membrane's thickness, determined at the slitlamp, patients were offered a neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser or surgical membranectomy. If surgically excised, the layer was studied by SEM. RESULTS: Of the 196 eyes, 62 eyes (33.16%) developed a thin epithelial cell layer. The membrane appeared a mean of 38.5 weeks postoperatively (range 9.9 to 85.6 weeks). Eleven eyes (5.61%) had visual symptoms varying from low vision to hazy vision or light scatter. Visual symptoms were present even in cases in which the visual axis was not invaded by the membrane. Once this layer was removed surgically or by the Nd:YAG laser, vision improved and symptoms were relieved. Four eyes (2.04%) required a surgical membranectomy. Examination of these removed membranes by SEM showed their multilayer nature and that the LECs had differentiated into fibroblast-like cells with collagenous fibrils and extracellular matrix. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LEC membrane formation was higher than expected and increased with time in eyes with a Hydroview IOL. The membrane caused visual symptoms by occluding the visual axis, causing striation on the membrane and the IOL to decenter, tilt, or fold. These symptoms improved after the membrane was removed.     

不同丙烯酸材料的人工晶状体对后发性白内障的影响

目的 探讨三种不同的丙烯酸材料的人工晶状体应用于白内障超声乳化吸除联合人工晶状体植入术后对后发性白内障的影响作用.方法 超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术的960例白内障患者(964只眼),Sensar组310只眼,Acrysof三片组332只眼,Acrysof一片组322只眼,术后定期随访18～28个月,观察视力、后发性白障的发生情况.结果 术后随访24月时,发生1级以上后囊膜混浊SensarIOL组的发生率(13.5%),明显高于Acrysof一片式IOL组及Acrysof三片式IOL组的发生率(7.5%,3.7%).经卡方检验,P值均<0.05,有显著性差异,而Acrysof三片式IOL组后囊膜混浊的发生率较Aerysof 一片式IOL组高,P<0.05.结论 AcrySof丙烯酸式一片式人工晶状体植入后出现后发性白内障的发生率在三组中最低.可以减少后发性白内障的发生降低Nd:YAG激光的使用率,提高手术效果,是现代白内障手术可选择的理想的人工晶状体.     

不同丙烯酸材料的人工晶状体对后发性白内障的影响

目的 探讨三种不同的丙烯酸材料的人工晶状体应用于白内障超声乳化吸除联合人工晶状体植入术后对后发性白内障的影响作用.方法 超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术的960例白内障患者(964只眼),Sensar组310只眼,Acrysof三片组332只眼,Acrysof一片组322只眼,术后定期随访18～28个月,观察视力、后发性白障的发生情况.结果 术后随访24月时,发生1级以上后囊膜混浊SensarIOL组的发生率(13.5%),明显高于Acrysof一片式IOL组及Acrysof三片式IOL组的发生率(7.5%,3.7%).经卡方检验,P值均<0.05,有显著性差异,而Acrysof三片式IOL组后囊膜混浊的发生率较Aerysof 一片式IOL组高,P<0.05.结论 AcrySof丙烯酸式一片式人工晶状体植入后出现后发性白内障的发生率在三组中最低.可以减少后发性白内障的发生降低Nd:YAG激光的使用率,提高手术效果,是现代白内障手术可选择的理想的人工晶状体.