Withdrawal of long-term physiological growth hormone (GH) administration: differential effects on bone density and body composition in men with adult-onset GH deficiency

Adults with acquired GH deficiency (GHD) have been shown to have osteopenia associated with a 3-fold increase in fracture risk and exhibit increased body fat and decreased lean mass. Replacement of GH results in decreased fat mass, increased lean mass, and increased bone mineral density (BMD). The possible differential effect of withdrawal of GH replacement on body composition compartments and regional bone mass is not known. We performed a randomized, single blind, placebo-controlled 36-month cross-over study of GH vs. placebo (PL) in adults with GHD and now report the effect of withdrawal of GH on percent body fat, lean mass, and bone density, as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Forty men (median age, 51 yr; range, 24-64 yr) with pituitary disease and peak serum GH levels under 5 microg/L in response to two pharmacological stimuli were randomized to GH therapy (starting dose, 10 microg/kg x day, final dose 4 microg/kg x day) vs. PL for 18 months. Replacement was provided in a physiological range by adjusting GH doses according to serum insulin-like growth factor I levels. After discontinuation of GH, body fat increased significantly (mean +/- SEM, 3.18 +/- 0.44%; P = 0.0001) and returned to baseline. Lean mass decreased significantly (mean loss, 2133 +/- 539 g; P = 0.0016), but remained slightly higher (1276 +/- 502 g above baseline; P = 0.0258) than at study initiation. In contrast to the effect on body composition, BMD did not reverse toward pretreatment baseline after discontinuation of GH. Bone density at the hip continued to rise during PL administration, showing a significant increase (0.0014 +/- 0.00042, g/cm2 x month; P = 0.005) between months 18-36. Every bone site except two (radial BMD and total bone mineral content), including those without a significant increase in BMD during the 18 months of GH administration, showed a net increase over the entire 36 months. Therefore, there is a critical differential response of the duration of GH action on different body composition compartments. Physiological GH administration has a persistent effect on bone mass 18 months after discontinuation of GH.     

Effect of growth hormone (GH) treatment on bone in postpubertal GH-deficient patients: a 2-year randomized,controlled, dose-ranging study

GH treatment in children with GH deficiency is frequently terminated at final height. However, in healthy individuals bone mass continues to accrue until peak bone mass is achieved. Because no prospective data specifically prove the role of GH in attainment of peak bone mass, we performed a multinational, controlled, 2-yr study in patients who had terminated pediatric GH at final height. Patients were randomized to: GH at 25.0 microg/kg x day (pediatric dose, n = 58) or 12.5 microg/kg x day (adult dose, n = 59), or no GH treatment (control, n = 32). Bone mineral content (BMC) and density were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and evaluated centrally. Laboratory measurements were also performed centrally. After 2 yr, significant increases were seen with both GH treatments, compared with control in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.004) and type I collagen C-terminal telopeptide:creatinine ratio (P < 0.001), but there were no significant dose effects. Total BMC increased by 9.5 +/- 8.4% in the adult dose group, 8.1 +/- 7.6% in the pediatric dose group, and 5.6 +/- 8.4% in controls (analysis of covariance, P = 0.008), with no significant GH dose effect. BMC increased predominantly at the lumbar spine (11.0 +/- 10.6%, P = 0.015) rather than at the femoral neck or hip. In contrast, a significant dose-dependent increase was seen in IGF-I concentrations (adult dose: 114.5 +/- 119.4 microg/liter; pediatric dose: 178.5 +/- 143.7 microg/liter; P = 0.023). There were no gender-related differences in BMC changes with either dose, whereas the IGF-I increase was significantly higher with the pediatric than with the adult dose in females (P < 0.001) but not males (P = 0.606). In summary, reinstitution of GH replacement after final height in severely GH-deficient patients induced significant progression toward peak bone mass. Although there was a by-gender dose effect on IGF-I concentration, the treatment effect on bone was obtained in both males and females with the adult GH dose regimen.     

Comparison of continuation or cessation of growth hormone (GH) therapy on body composition and metabolic status in adolescents with severe GH deficiency at completion of linear growth

Although GH replacement improves the features of GH deficiency (GHD) in adults, it has yet to be established whether cessation of GH at completion of childhood growth results in adverse consequences for the adolescent with GHD. Effects of continuation or cessation of GH on body composition, insulin sensitivity, and lipid levels were studied in 24 adolescents (13 males, 11 females, aged 17.0 +/- 0.3, yr, mean +/- se, puberty stage 4 or 5) in whom height velocity was less than 2 cm/yr. Provocative testing confirmed severe GHD [peak GH < 9 mU/liter (3 microg/liter)] in all cases and was followed by a lead-in period of 3 months during which the pediatric dose of GH continued unchanged. Baseline investigations were then performed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (body composition), lipid measurements, and assessment of insulin sensitivity by both homeostasis model assessment and a short insulin tolerance test. Twelve patients remained on GH (0.35 U/kg.wk), and 12 patients ceased GH treatment. The groups were followed up in parallel with repeat observations made after 6 and 12 months.No endocrine differences were evident between the groups at baseline. GH cessation resulted in a reduction of serum IGF-I Z score [-1.62 +/- 0.29, baseline vs. -2.52 +/- 0.12, 6 months (P < 0.05) vs. -2.52 +/- 0.10, 12 months (P < 0.01)] but values remained unchanged in those continuing GH replacement. Lean body mass increased by 2.5 +/- 0.5 kg ( approximately 6%) over 12 months in those receiving GH but was unchanged after GH discontinuation. Cessation of GH resulted in increased insulin sensitivity [short insulin tolerance test, 153 +/- 22 micromol/liter.min, baseline vs. 187 +/- 20, 6 months (P < 0.05) vs. 204 +/- 14, 12 months (P = 0.05)], but no significant change was seen during 12 months of GH continuation. Lipid levels remained unaltered in both groups.Continuation of GH at completion of linear growth resulted in ongoing accrual of lean body mass (LBM), whereas skeletal muscle mass remained static after GH cessation in these adolescents with GHD. This divergence of gain in LBM is of potential importance because increases in LBM occur as a feature of healthy late adolescent development. GH is a major mediator of insulin sensitivity, independent of body composition in adolescents. Further studies are required to determine whether discontinuation of GH in the adolescent with severe GHD once linear growth is complete results in long-term irreversible adverse physical and metabolic consequences and to determine conclusively the benefits of continuing GH therapy.     

Accelerated escape from GH autonegative feedback in midpuberty in males: evidence for time-delimited GH-induced somatostatinergic outflow in adolescent boys

A single injected pulse of GH inhibits the time-delayed secretion of GH in the adult by way of central mechanisms that drive somatostatin and repress GHRH outflow. The marked amplification of spontaneous GH pulse amplitude in puberty poses an autoregulatory paradox. We postulated that this disparity might reflect unique relief of GH-induced autonegative feedback during this window of development. The present study contrasts GH autonegative feedback in: 1) normal prepubertal boys (PP) (n = 6; Tanner genital stage I, chronologically aged 8 yr, 9 months to 10 yr, 1 month; median bone age 8.5 yr); 2) longitudinally identified midpubertal boys (MP) (n = 6; Tanner genital stages III/IV, aged 12 yr, 6 months to 15 yr, 6 months; median bone age 15 yr); and 3) healthy young men (YM) (n = 6, aged 18-24 yr; bone age >18 yr). Subjects each underwent four randomly ordered tandem peptide infusions on separate mornings while fasting: i.e. 1) saline/saline infused iv bolus at 0830 h and 1030 h; 2) saline/GHRH (0.3 microg/kg i.v. bolus) at the foregoing times; 3) recombinant human (rh) GH (3 microg/kg as a 6-min square-wave i.v. pulse)/saline; and 4) rhGH and GHRH. To monitor GH autofeedback effects, blood samples were obtained every 10 min for 5.5 h beginning at 0800 h (30 min before GH or saline infusion). Serum GH concentrations were quantitated by ultrasensitive chemiluminometry (threshold 0.005 microg/liter). On the day of successive saline/saline infusion, MP boys maintained higher serum concentrations of: 1) GH ( microg/liter), 2.2 +/- 0.25, compared with PP (0.61 +/- 0.10) or YM (0.88 +/- 0.36) (P = 0.011); 2) IGF-I ( micro g/liter), 493 +/- 49 vs. PP (134 +/- 16) and YM (242 +/- 22) (P < 0.001); 3) T (ng/dl), 524 +/- 58 vs. PP (<20) (P < 0.001); and 4) E2 (pg/ml),19 +/- 3 vs. PP (< 10) (P = 0.030) (mean +/- SEM). Consecutive saline/GHRH infusion elicited comparable peak (absolute maximal) serum GH concentrations (micrograms per liter) in the three study groups, i.e. 18 +/- 5.0 (PP), 9.6 +/- 1.7 (MP), and 14 +/- 5.3 (YM) (each P < 0.01 vs. saline; P = NS cohort effect). Injection of rhGH attenuated subsequent GHRH-stimulated peak serum GH concentrations (micrograms per liter) to 7.8 +/- 1.9 (PP), 5.8 +/- 1.2 (MP), and 4.8 +/- 1.1 (YM) (each P < 0.01 vs. saline; P = NS pubertal effect). GH autofeedback reduced non-GHRH-stimulated (basal) serum GH concentrations by 0.74 +/- 0.28 (PP), 5.7 +/- 1.7 (MP) and 1.4 +/- 0.27 (YM) fold, compared with saline (P = 0.016 for MP vs. PP or YM). In addition to greater fractional autoinhibition, MP boys exhibited markedly accentuated postnadir escape (4.6-fold steeper slope) of suppressed GH concentrations (P < 0.001 vs. PP or YM). Linear regression analysis of data from all 18 subjects revealed that the fasting IGF-I concentration negatively predicted fold-autoinhibition of GHRH-stimulated peak GH release (r = -0.847, P = 0.006) and positively forecast fold-autoinhibition of basal GH release (r = +0.869, P < 0.001). In contrast, the kinetics of rhGH did not differ among the three study cohorts. In summary, boys in midpuberty manifest equivalent responsiveness to exogenous GHRH-stimulated GH secretion; heightened susceptibility to rhGH-induced fractional inhibition of endogenous secretagogue-driven GH release, compared with the prepubertal or adult male; and accelerated recovery of GH output after acute autonegative feedback. This novel tripartite mechanism could engender recurrent high-amplitude GH secretory bursts that mark sex hormone-dependent activation of the human somatotropic axis.     

Low-dose recombinant human growth hormone as adjuvant therapy to lifestyle modifications in the management of obesity

Obese individuals are in a reduced GH/IGF-I state that may be maladaptive. Fifty-nine obese men and premenopausal menstruating women (body mass index, 36.9 +/- 5.0 kg/m(2)) were randomized to a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low dose recombinant human GH (rhGH). During the 6-month intervention, subjects self-administered daily rhGH or equivalent volume of placebo at 200 micro g (1.9 +/- 0.3 microg/kg for men, 2.0 +/- 0.3 microg/kg for women); after 1 month, the dose was increased to 400 microg (3.8 +/- 0.5 microg/kg) in men and 600 microg (6.0 +/- 0.8 microg/kg) in women. rhGH was then discontinued, and subjects were followed up after 3 months. Forty completed the intervention, and 39 completed the follow-up. Drop-out rates between rhGH vs. placebo groups were not different (chi(2) = 1.45; P = 0.228). One subject discontinued the drug due to an rhGH-related side effect. Body weight (BW) decreased with rhGH from 100.4 +/- 13.2 to 98.0 +/- 15.6 kg at 6 months (P = 0.04) and was sustained at 98.1 +/- 16.6 kg at 9 months (P = 0.02). BW loss was entirely due to loss of body fat (BF). Intention to treat analyses demonstrated changes from baseline between rhGH and placebo in BW (-2.16 +/- 4.48 vs. -0.04 +/- 2.67 kg; P = 0.03) and BF (-2.89 +/- 3.76 vs. -0.68 +/- 2.37 kg; P = 0.01). rhGH increased IGF-I from -0.72 to +0.10 SD (P = 0.0001). rhGH increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 19% from 1.11 +/- 0.34 to 1.32 +/- 0.28 mmol/liter (P < 0.001). Neither group had changes in fasting glucose, insulin sensitivity, or resting energy expenditure. In conclusion, in obesity, rhGH normalized IGF-I levels, induced loss of BW from BF, and improved lipid profile without untoward effects on insulin sensitivity.     

Circulating IGF-I levels in monitoring and predicting efficacy during long-term GH treatment of GH-deficient adults

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of long-term GH in GH-deficient adults, as predicted by IGF-I levels. METHODS: Patients received GH, 5 microg/kg per day for 1 Month and 10 microg/kg per day for another 12-30 Months. Changes in body composition, cardiac structure/function, serum lipids and quality of life were measured. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in lean body mass (LBM) (2.21 kg; P<0.0001) after 6 Months, which was sustained throughout treatment. A larger increase occurred in males than females (2.97 vs 1.19 kg; P<0.0001). Total fat mass was reduced (2.56 kg; P<0.0001 (3.26 kg males, 1.63 kg females)). Responsiveness to GH varied greatly, but LBM changes correlated with IGF-I changes (P<0.004). Furthermore, thinner patients experienced greater and progressive LBM increases. There was an increase in ejection fraction (3.85+/-9.95%; P=0.0002) after 6 Months, sustained to 18 Months. These cardiac effects were equal for males and females, and did not correlate with IGF-I levels. Serum low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratios decreased within 6 Months, and were sustained thereafter. Quality of life improved significantly after 6 Months, an effect that was sustained/enhanced as treatment continued. No major adverse events were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Improved body composition is both reflected by IGF-I changes and predicted inversely by baseline adiposity. Other effects of GH replacement on cardiac function, dyslipidaemia and quality of life, however, do not correlate with circulating IGF-I concentrations. Our findings validate the importance of sustained GH therapy, but caution on the interpretation of IGF-I levels in monitoring the long-term effects of GH treatment.     

Leptin concentrations in GH deficiency: the effect of GH insensitivity

Disorders of GH secretion are known to impair the physiological lipostat and to affect the secretion of leptin, a sensitive marker of regional fat accumulation and total body composition. In both children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD), leptin levels are increased proportionately with enhanced adiposity. In GHI, mutations of the GH receptor gene result in a phenotype similar to GHD, with increased adiposity and unfavorable lipid profiles. To examine the impact of different forms of growth disorders on leptin production, we measured leptin levels in 22 GHI patients homozygous for the E180 splice mutation (15 females and 7 males, aged 8-37 yr) and compared results with those obtained in 20 subjects heterozygous for the mutation (11 females and 9 males, aged 7-54), 17 idiopathic GHD patients (6 females and 11 males, aged 3-34), and 44 normal subjects (25 females and 19 males, aged 7-45). After the baseline evaluation, all subjects received two 7-d GH treatments at doses of 0.025 and 0.050 mg/kg x d in random order. Leptin, IGF-I, and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were assayed by specific immunoassays. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in homozygous GHI and GHD patients compared with either controls or GHI heterozygotes. Circulating leptin levels were significantly higher in homozygous GHI patients than in normal controls (20.7 +/- 4.2 vs. 8.7 +/- 1.4 microg/liter) as well as when compared with heterozygous GHI subjects (14.4 +/- 3.4 microg/liter) and GHD patients (9.8 +/- 1.6 microg/liter; P < 0.01). Similar results were obtained when leptin was normalized for body mass index. When subjects were subgrouped by gender, leptin levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in GHI females than in females of all other groups and were significantly increased in GHD males (P < 0.01 vs. control males). Within the study groups, females had significantly higher leptin levels than males in controls (12.7 +/- 2 vs. 3.3 +/- 1 microg/liter; P < 0.001) and homozygous GHI patients (28.7 +/- 5.3 vs. 6.9 +/- 2.3 microg/liter; P < 0.05), but not in heterozygous GHI (20.1 +/- 5.4 vs. 7.3 +/- 2.4 microg/liter; P < 0.06) and GHD (10.9 +/- 2.6 vs. 9.2 +/- 2.1 microg/liter) patients. By multivariate analysis, log-normalized leptin levels were best predicted by gender and body mass index in homozygous GHI patients as well as in normal subjects. During the 1-wk courses of GH therapy, serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels significantly increased (P < 0.0001) in GHD patients, heterozygous GHI patients, and control subjects at both GH doses. Inversely, leptin levels did not change significantly during either course of GH administration in the groups examined. These data demonstrate that leptin is increased in patients affected with long-standing homozygous GHI, probably reflecting abnormalities of body composition and metabolism typical of this condition.     

Continued growth hormone (GH) treatment after final height is necessary to complete somatic development in childhood-onset GH-deficient patients

Lean body mass (LBM), fat mass (FM), and total bone mineral content are significantly reduced in adult GHD subjects who had received pediatric GH. To test the hypothesis that continued GH therapy after final height is necessary to attain adult body composition, we performed a prospective, multinational, randomized, controlled, 2-yr study in patients who completed pediatric GH treatment at final height. Patients were randomized to GH at 25.0 microg/kg x d (pediatric dose; n = 58) or 12.5 microg/kg x d (adult dose; n = 59) or no GH treatment (control; n = 32). LBM and FM were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and were centrally evaluated. IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3, and lipid concentrations were also measured centrally. During the 2 yr, GH-treated patients gained a significant amount of LBM compared with controls (P < 0.001), but the change with the higher pediatric dose (14.2 +/- 11.7%) was not different from that seen with the lower adult dose (12.7 +/- 9.4%; P = 0.970). Similarly, the decrease in FM was significantly (P = 0.029) influenced by treatment, but with no dose effect (adult dose, -7.1 +/- 22.8%; pediatric dose, -6.0 +/- 26.6%; P = 0.950). When the GH treatment effect was analyzed by gender, males gained 15.6 +/- 9.8% and 14.3 +/- 11.7% LBM (P = 0.711) and lost 12.4 +/- 22.2% and 11.0 +/- 27.1% FM (P = 0.921) with the low and high doses, respectively. Females gained 8.3 +/- 7.3% and 12.5 +/- 12.8% LBM with the two doses (P = 0.630), but increased their FM by 3.5 +/- 16.2% with the lower dose and lost only 1.2 +/- 23.2% FM with the higher dose (P = 0.325). A similar pattern was seen in IGF-I sd score; the 2-yr GH dose response was significantly higher with the pediatric than with the adult dose in females (P = 0.008), but not males (P = 0.790). The divergent pattern of change in LBM and FM in males and females is consistent with normal developmental sexual dimorphism and indicates that GH-dependent progress to target body composition continues after the age at which GH treatment is usually terminated. Dose requirements may have to be adjusted by gender, with females requiring a higher dose than males.     

Left ventricular mass and function in children with GH deficiency before and during 12 months GH replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE: This open, prospective study was designed to evaluate the effect of GH deficiency (GHD) on left ventricular (LV) mass (LVM) and performance, by echocardiography, and on lipid profile during childhood. SUBJECTS: Twelve prepubertal children with GHD (eight boys and four girls) aged 8.1 +/- 1.7 years were studied before and after 6 and 12 months of GH replacement therapy at a dose of GH of 30 micro g/kg/day. Twelve healthy children sex-, height-, weight- and body surface area-matched with the patients, served as controls. METHODS: Echocardiography was performed at study entry and after 12 months both in GHD children and in controls. Only in GHD children, echocardiography was repeated also after 6 months of GH replacement. In all subjects, we measured LV posterior wall thickness (LVPWT), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), LVM index (LVMi), LV systolic and diastolic function. RESULTS: At study entry, LVPWT (5.3 +/- 0.8 vs. 6.2 +/- 1.1 mm, P < 0.05), LVEDD (34.0 +/- 2.4 vs. 36.7 +/- 2.1 mm, P < 0.007) and LVMi (47.0 +/- 6.9 vs. 59.6 +/- 9.5 g/m2, P < 0.005) were significantly lower in GHD children than in controls. Lipid profile, heart rate, blood pressure, LV systolic function and indices of ventricular filling were similar in patients and controls. After 12 months of GH replacement therapy, LVPWT (6.1 +/- 0.7 mm, P < 0.0005), LVEDD (38.8 +/- 4.3 mm, P < 0.002) and LVMi (71.5 +/- 12.7 g/m2, P < 0.0005) significantly increased in GHD children compared to pretreatment values. In particular, after 12 months of therapy GHD children achieved a normal LVMi when compared to controls (60.7 +/- 8.6, P = ns). LVMi increase was significantly correlated with the increase in IGF-I level (r = 0.49; P < 0.004). LV systolic performance, diastolic filling and blood pressure did not change significantly during GH therapy. After 12 months of treatment, the atherogenic index, measured as total/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (2.7 +/- 0.8) was significantly lower than both pretreatment (3.4 +/- 0.3, P < 0.03) and control values (3.8 +/- 1.1, P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: GH deficiency in children affects heart morphology, by inducing a significant decrease in cardiac size, but does not modify cardiac function and lipid profile. Twelve months of GH replacement treatment normalizes cardiac mass, and reduces the atherogenic index.     

Short- and long-term effects of growth hormone (GH) replacement on protein metabolism in GH-deficient adults

Reduced fat-free mass (FFM) in GH-deficient (GHD) adults is improved by GH replacement, but the protein metabolic changes are unclear. Using iv [(2)H(3)]leucine and oral l-[(13)C(1)]leucine infusions and dual emission x-ray absorptiometry, we compared leucine kinetics and body composition in eight GHD adults and eight healthy controls in the fasted and fed states, before and after 2 wk and 6 months of GH replacement. Leucine kinetics were not different between pretreatment GHD subjects and controls. After 2 wk of GH treatment, leucine oxidation decreased in the GHD subjects compared with baseline values [fasted, 41 +/- 6 vs. 30 +/- 5 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.01); fed, 49 +/- 3 vs. 41 +/- 3.6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05)], leucine balance improved [fasted, -14 +/- 4 vs. -3.5 +/- 3 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.01); fed, 65 +/- 10 vs. 72 +/- 7 micromol/kg FFM.h (P = 0.07)], and protein synthesis increased [fasted, 116 +/- 5 vs. 131 +/- 6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05); fed, 103 +/- 6 vs. 116 +/- 6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05)]. After 6 months of GH treatment, these changes were not maintained in the fed state. The five GHD subjects with decreased FFM at baseline showed a significant increase after 6 months of GH treatment (P < 0.05). GH replacement in GHD acutely improves protein balance by stimulating synthesis and inhibiting catabolism. After 6 months, protein kinetics reached a new homeostasis to maintain the net gain in FFM.     

Inhibition of lipolysis during acute GH exposure increases insulin sensitivity in previously untreated GH-deficient adults

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies evaluating the lipolytic effect of GH have in general been performed in subjects on chronic GH therapy. In this study we assessed the lipolytic effect of GH in previously untreated patients and examined whether the negative effect of enhanced lipolysis on glucose metabolism could be counteracted by acute antilipolysis achieved with acipimox. METHODS: Ten GH-deficient (GHD) adults participated in four experiments each, during which they received in a double-blind manner: placebo (A); GH (0.88+/-0.13 mg) (B); GH+acipimox 250 mg b.i.d. (C); and acipimox b.i.d. (no GH) (D), where GH was given the night before a 2 h euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with infusion of [3-(3)H]glucose and indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: GH increased basal free fatty acid (FFA) levels by 74% (P=0.0051) and insulin levels by 93% (P=0.0051). This resulted in a non-significant decrease in insulin-stimulated glucose uptakes (16.61+/-8.03 vs 12.74+/-5.50 micromol/kg per min (s.d.), P=0.07 for A vs B). The rates of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake correlated negatively with the FFA concentrations (r=-0.638, P<0.0001). However, acipimox caused a significant improvement in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in the GH-treated patients (17.35+/-5.65 vs 12.74+/-5.50 micromol/kg per min, P=0.012 for C vs B). The acipimox-induced enhancement of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was mainly due to an enhanced rate of glucose oxidation (8.32+/-3.00 vs 5.88+/-2.39 micromol/kg per min, P=0.07 for C vs B). The enhanced rates of glucose oxidation induced by acipimox correlated negatively with the rate of lipid oxidation in GH-treated subjects both in basal (r=-0.867, P=0.0093) and during insulin-stimulated (r=-0.927, P=0.0054) conditions. GH did not significantly impair non-oxidative glucose metabolism (6.86+/-5.22 vs 8.67+/-6.65 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for B vs A). The fasting rate of endogenous glucose production was unaffected by GH and acipimox administration (10.99+/-1.98 vs 11.73+/-2.38 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for B vs A and 11.55+/-2.7 vs 10.99+/-1.98 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for C vs B). On the other hand, acipimox alone improved glucose uptake in the untreated GHD patients (24.14+/-8.74 vs 16.61+/-8.03 micromol/kg per min, P=0.0077 for D vs A) and this was again due to enhanced fasting (7.90+/-2.68 vs 5.16+/-2.28 micromol/kg per min, P=0.01 for D vs A) and insulin-stimulated (9.78+/-3.68 vs 7.95+/-2.64 micromol/kg per min, P=0.07 for D vs A) glucose oxidation. CONCLUSION: The study of acute administration of GH to previously untreated GHD patients provides compelling evidence that (i) GH-induced insulin resistance is mainly due to induction of lipolysis by GH; and (ii) inhibition of lipolysis can prevent the deterioration of insulin sensitivity. The question remains whether GH replacement therapy should, at least at the beginning of therapy, be combined with means to prevent an excessive stimulation of lipolysis by GH.     

Activation of somatostatin-receptor subtype-2/-5 suppresses the mass, frequency, and irregularity of growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide-2-stimulated GH secretion in men

Somatostatin antagonizes the stimulatory actions of GHRH and GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs). However, precisely how the inhibitory susceptibilities of the two secretagogues differ is not clear. One interpretative difficulty is that native somatostatin activates six different receptor subtypes. The present study adopts the complementary strategy of enforcing feedback inhibition via the preferential somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and 5 (SSTR-2/-5) agonist, octreotide. We postulated that putative SSTR-2/-5 agonism would unmask secretagogue-selective interactions in the control of GH secretory burst mass, frequency, and/or regularity. To this end, 10 healthy men each underwent eight randomly ordered, separate-day, fasting morning infusion sessions. Interventions comprised sc administration of octreotide (1 microg/kg), followed by bolus iv injection of saline, GHRH (1 microg/kg), GHRP-2 (1 microg/kg), or both peptides. Compared with placebo, the SSTR-2/-5 agonist reduced fasting GH concentrations from 0.27 +/- 0.07 to 0.12 +/- 0.02 microg/liter (P = 0.020), GH secretory burst mass from 2.7 +/- 0.65 to 0.55 +/- 0.11 microg/liter (P = 0.013), and basal GH secretion from 0.24 +/- 0.043 to 0.11 +/- 0.015 microg/liter.100 min (P = 0.0063). The foregoing outcomes were selective, because octreotide did not alter GH secretory burst frequency (3.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.21 events/3 h) or the regularity of the GH release process (approximate entropy, 0.58 +/- 0.048 vs. 0.68 +/- 0.064). In the GHRP-2-stimulated setting, presumptive SSTR-2/-5 agonism suppressed all three GH secretory burst masses, from 28 +/- 3.2 to 18 +/- 2.0 (P = 0.045); GH pulse frequency, from 3.3 +/- 0.30 to 2.0 +/- 0.18 (P = 0.0025); and the irregularity (approximate entropy) of GH release, from 0.648 +/- 0.049 to 0.433 +/- 0.047 (P < 0.01). In contrast, in the GHRH and combined GHRH/GHRP-2-stimulated contexts, octreotide decreased only GH secretory burst mass (P = 0.047). In summary, the present data indicate that GH secretory burst mass, frequency, and orderliness are subject to interactive control by at least SSTR-2/-5-dependent feedback and GHRP-dependent feedforward signals.     

A comparative study of once-daily versus twice-daily filgrastim administration for the mobilization and collection of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells in normal donors

Eighty-one first-time normal donors underwent leukapheresis for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection after mobilization with filgrastim administered either twice-daily (6 microg/kg every 12 h; n = 40) or once-daily (12 microg/kg; n = 41) subcutaneously for 3 d. The groups were similar for age, donor blood volume and target CD34+ cell dose to be collected (>/= 4 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient). There was no statistically significant difference in the apheresis yield of CD34+ PBPCs (x 106) per kg recipient weight (5.6 +/- 3.3 vs. 5.6 +/- 4.3; P = 0.94) and per litre of blood processed (30 +/- 17.2 vs. 30.4 +/- 19.5; P = 0.92).     

Low individualized growth hormone (GH) dose increased renal and cardiac growth in young adults with childhood onset GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE: In childhood onset GH deficiency (GHD) a reduction in left ventricular mass (LV-mass) and impairment of systolic function as well an impairment in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been shown. The aim of the present study was to assess if a low GH dose resulted in an improvement in morphological and functional parameters of these organs. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Eleven patients with childhood onset GHD were investigated before and after 10 months of GH treatment at a dose of 1.5 IU/day (range 1-2), corresponding to 0.02 IU/kg/day or 7 microg/ kg/day. The GH dose resulted in a serum IGF-I level in the normal range in all but one patient. MEASUREMENTS: Doppler echocardiography of the heart and ultrasound examination of the kidneys was performed. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated with iohexol clearance and urinary proteinuria was measured with 24-h urinary samples collected for analyses of albumin, alpha-1-microglobulin, IgG and albumin/creatinine clearance ratio. Body composition was measured by bioelectric impedance analysis. RESULTS: L V-mass index increased significantly after GH treatment (P = 0.04), and there was a clear trend for a positive correlation between the increase in serum IGF-I and the increase in LV-mass index, although it did not reach significance (r= 0.57, P = 0.07). GH treatment did not increase cardiac fractional shortening. Kidney length increased significantly (P = 0.02) with an average increase of 1 cm (range - 0.5-1.5 cm). No significant changes in median GFR or serum creatinine were recorded. Three patients with subnormal GFR before GH treatment normalized after 10 months of treatment. Urine analysis showed no abnormalities before or after GH treatment. A significant decrease in percentage fat mass was recorded (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A low individualized GH dose to adults with childhood onset GHD resulted in an increase in LV-mass index and kidney length. Re-establishing GH treatment with a low dose in this patient group can lead to a further somatic maturation of these organs, probably not accomplished previously.     

E2 supplementation selectively relieves GH's autonegative feedback on GH-releasing peptide-2-stimulated GH secretion.

Female gender confers resistance to GH autonegative feedback in the adult rat, thereby suggesting gonadal or estrogenic modulation of autoregulation of the somatotropic axis. Here we test the clinical hypothesis that short-term E2 replacement in ovariprival women reduces GH's repression of spontaneous, GHRH-, and GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-stimulated GH secretion. To this end, we appraised GH autoinhibition in nine healthy postmenopausal volunteers during a prospective, randomly ordered supplementation with placebo vs. E [1 mg micronized 17 beta-E2 orally twice daily for 6-23 d]. The GH autofeedback paradigm consisted of a 6-min pulsed i.v. infusion of recombinant human GH (10 microg/kg square-wave injection) or saline (control) followed by i.v. bolus GHRH (1 microg/kg), GHRP-2 (1 microg/kg), or saline 2 h later. Blood was sampled every 10 min and serum GH concentrations were measured by chemiluminescence. Poststimulus GH release was quantitated by multiparameter deconvolution analysis using published biexponential kinetics and by the incremental peak serum GH concentration response (maximal poststimulus value minus prepeak nadir). Outcomes were analyzed on the logarithmic scale by mixed-effects ANOVA at a multiple-comparison type I error rate of 0.05. E2 supplementation increased the (mean +/- SEM) serum E2 concentration from 43 +/- 1.8 (control) to 121 +/- 4 pg/ml (E2) (158 +/- 6.6 to 440 +/- 15 pmol/liter; P < 0.001), lowered the 0800 h (preinfusion) serum IGF-I concentration from 127 +/- 7.7 to 73 +/- 3.6 microg/liter (P < 0.01), and amplified spontaneous pulsatile GH production from 7.5 +/- 1.1 to 13 +/- 2.3 microg/liter per 6 h (P = 0.020). In the absence of exogenously imposed GH autofeedback, E2 replacement enhanced the stimulatory effect of GHRP-2 on incremental peak GH release by 1.58-fold [95% confidence interval, 1.2- to 2.1-fold] (P = 0.0034) but did not alter the action of GHRH (0.83-fold [0.62- to 1.1-fold]). In the E2-deficient state, bolus GH infusion significantly inhibited subsequent spontaneous, GHRH-, and GHRP-induced incremental peak GH responses by, respectively, 33% (1-55%; P = 0.044 vs. saline), 79% (68-86%; P < 0.0001), and 54% (32-69%; P = 0.0002). E2 repletion failed to influence GH autofeedback on either spontaneous or GHRH-stimulated incremental peak GH output. In contrast, E2 replenishment augmented the GHRP-2-stimulated incremental peak GH response in the face of GH autoinhibition by 1.7-fold (1.2- to 2.5-fold; P = 0.009). Mechanistically, the latter effect of E2 mirrored its enhancement of GH-repressed/GHRP-2-stimulated GH secretory pulse mass, which rose by 1.5-fold (0.95- to 2.5-fold over placebo; P = 0.078). In summary, the present clinical investigation documents the ability of short-term oral E2 supplementation in postmenopausal women to selectively rescue GHRP-2 (but not spontaneous or GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion from autonegative feedback. The secretagogue specificity of E's relief of GH autoinhibition suggests that this sex steroid may enhance activity of the hypothalamopituitary GHRP-receptor/effector pathway.     

The effects on insulin action in adult hypopituitarism of recombinant human GH therapy individually titrated for six months.

There is controversy about the effect of replacement GH on insulin action in adult hypopituitary patients. GH replacement calculated from weight leads to unacceptable side effects in some patients. Recent studies suggest it should be individually titrated in adults using serum IGF-I levels. We have assessed the effect of titrated GH replacement on peripheral and hepatic insulin action in 13 adult-onset hypopituitary patients (8 males and 5 females; ages 47 +/- 10 yr, mean duration of hypopituitarism 6 yr) with confirmed GH deficiency (GHD; maximum GH <5 mU/liter during insulin induced hypoglycemia), ACTH deficiency, and normal glucose tolerance. All patients were on stable hydrocortisone replacement (15 mg with breakfast, 5 mg with evening meal) for at least 2 months before the trial. Insulin action was assessed by the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp technique (1 mU/kg x min) before and after 6 months of GH therapy. GH was started at 0.8 IU sc daily and titrated monthly until the serum IGF-I increased to within 1-2 SD of the mean of normal age-matched controls. Body mass index did not change significantly during the 6 months of GH therapy. Fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c increased significantly after 6 months (5.2 +/- 0.0 vs. 5.5 +/- 0.0 mmol/liter, P < 0.0001, and 4.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.1%, P < 0.0005, respectively). There was no increase in fasting serum insulin (51.6 +/- 10.2 vs. 60.0 +/- 10.2 pmol/liter, P = 0.12). Exogenous glucose infusion rates required to maintain euglycemia were similar after GH (23.0 +/- 0.4 vs. 21.1 +/- 0.3 micromol/kg x min, P = 0.6). Endogenous glucose production in the fasting state was also unchanged following GH (11.8 +/- 0.7 vs.12.3 +/- 0.9 micromol/kg x min, P = 0.5) and suppressed to a similar extent following insulin (4.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.5 +/- 0.8 micromol/kg x min, P = 0.3). In summary, GH therapy for 6 months, with serum IGF-I maintained in the upper physiological range, increased fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c. There was no effect on peripheral or hepatic insulin sensitivity. Patients receiving GH therapy require long-term monitoring of glucose tolerance.     

Gender differences in the effects of long term growth hormone (GH) treatment on bone in adults with GH deficiency.

We recently observed that among patients with GH deficiency due to adult-onset hypopituitarism, men responded with a greater increase in serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and biochemical markers of bone metabolism than women when the same dose of recombinant human GH (rhGH) per body surface area was administered for 9 months. In the present study, 33 of the 36 patients in the previous trial (20 men and 13 women) continued therapy for up to 45 months. The dose of rhGH was adjusted according to side-effects and to maintain serum IGF-I within the physiological range. This resulted in a significant dose reduction in the men; consequently, the women received twice as much rhGH as the men (mean +/- SD, 1.9 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.6 U/day; P < 0.01). The increases in serum IGF-I levels and serum biochemical markers of bone metabolism were similar in men and women with these doses. The total bone mineral content (BMC) was increased after 33 and 45 months of treatment up to 5.1% (P = 0.004 and 0.0001). Bone mineral density (BMD), BMC, and the area of the femoral neck and the lumbar spine were also significantly increased after 33 and 45 months of treatment. When analyzed by gender, total body BMC, femoral neck BMD and BMC, and spinal BMC were significantly increased in males, but not in females (P < 0.05-0.01). In conclusion, rhGH treatment continued to have an effect on bone metabolism and bone mass for up to 45 months of therapy. The changes in bone mass were greater in the men, although they received lower doses of rhGH than the women. The results indicate that the sensitivity to GH in adult patients with GH deficiency is gender dependent.     

Continuation of growth hormone (GH) therapy in GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood: impact on insulin sensitivity and substrate metabolism

The appropriate management of GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood has not been reported in controlled trials, even though there is evidence to suggest that this phase is associated with specific problems in relation to GH sensitivity. An issue of particular interest is the impact of GH substitution on insulin sensitivity, which normally declines during puberty. We, therefore, evaluated insulin sensitivity (euglycemic glucose clamp) and substrate metabolism in 18 GH-deficient patients (6 females and 12 males; age, 20 +/- 1 yr; body mass index, 25 +/- 1 kg/m2) in a placebo-controlled, parallel study. Measurements were made at baseline, where all patients were on their regular GH replacement, after 12 months of either continued GH (0.018 +/- 0.001 mg/kg day) or placebo, and finally after 12 months of open phase GH therapy (0.016 mg/kg x day). Before study entry GH deficiency was reconfirmed by a stimulation test. During the double-blind phase, insulin sensitivity and fat mass tended to increase in the placebo group [deltaM-value (mg/kg x min), -0.7 +/- 1.1 (GH) vs. 1.3 +/- 0.8 (placebo), P = 0.18; deltaTBF (kg), 0.9 +/- 1.2 (GH) vs. 4.4 +/- 1.6 (placebo), P = 0.1]. Rates of lipid oxidation decreased [delta lipid oxidation (mg/kg x min), 0.02 +/- 0.14 (GH) vs. -0.32 +/- 0.13 (placebo), P < 0.05], whereas glucose oxidation increased in the placebo-treated group (P < 0.05). In the open phase, a decrease in insulin sensitivity was found in the former placebo group, although they lost body fat and increased fat-free mass [M-value (mg/kg x min), 5.1 +/- 0.7 (placebo) vs. 3.4 +/- 1.0 (open), P = 0.09]. In the group randomized to continued GH treatment almost all hormonal and metabolic parameters remained unchanged during the study. In conclusion, 1) discontinuation of GH therapy for 1 yr in adolescent patients induces fat accumulation without compromising insulin sensitivity; and 2) the beneficial effects of continued GH treatment on body composition in terms of decrease in fat mass and increase in fat-free mass does not fully balance the direct insulin antagonistic effects.     

Effects of one year of recombinant human growth hormone (GH) therapy on cardiac mass and function in children with classical GH deficiency

Cardiac mass and function were evaluated in 10 children with classical GH deficiency. Echocardiograms were performed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation of recombinant human (rh) GH therapy (0.3 mg/kg.wk). Before treatment, left ventricular (LV) mass indexed to body surface area (BSA) was low or low normal (<50 g/m(2)) in five children compared with reference control data. Height SD score (-3.2 +/- 0.9 vs. -1.8 +/- 1.3 yr; P < 0.01), growth velocity SD score (-2.7 +/- 1.6 vs. 5.8 +/- 3.1; P < 0.01), LV mass (36 +/- 9 vs. 60 +/- 30 g; P < 0.02), LV mass/BSA (51 +/- 12 vs. 72 +/- 11 g/m(2); P < 0.01), LV mass/height (36 +/- 9 vs. 54 +/- 15 g/m; P < 0.02), and LV mass/m(2.7) (36 +/- 12 vs. 45 +/- 8; P < 0.05) increased significantly with rhGH therapy. Pretreatment LV mass/BSA correlated inversely with fold increase in LV mass/BSA over the year (r = -0.83; P < 0.01). Load-dependent indices of diastolic performance were normal at baseline and did not change with rhGH therapy. Percentage increase of mean velocity of circumferential shortening, an index of systolic function, correlated with fold increase in LV mass/BSA (r = 0.88; P < 0.02) over the year of rhGH administration. LV mass can be lower than predicted for body size in some children with severe GH deficiency but is responsive to rhGH replacement. LV mass/BSA increases into the normal range during the first year of rhGH therapy. The rate of increase of LV mass is greater than the increase in BSA during rhGH treatment, suggesting that GH could also be a trophic factor for the heart.     

High dose recombinant human growth hormone (GH) treatment of GH-deficient patients in puberty increases near-final height: a randomized, multicenter trial. Genentech, Inc., Cooperative Study Group

GH production rates markedly increase during human puberty, mostly as an amplitude-modulated phenomenon. However, GH-deficient children have been dosed on a standard per kg BW basis similar to prepubertal children. This randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of standard recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy (group I, 0.3 mg/kg x week) vs. high dose therapy (group II, 0.7 mg/kg x week) in GH-deficient adolescents previously treated with rhGH for at least 6 months. Ninety-seven children with documented evidence of GH deficiency (peak GH in response to stimuli, <10 ng/mL), with either organic or idiopathic pathology, were recruited. Both groups were matched for sex (group I, 42 males and 7 females; group II, 41 males and 7 females), age [group I, 14.0+/-1.6 (+/-SD) yr; group II, 13.7+/-1.6], standardized height (group I, -1.4+/-1.1; group II, -1.2+/-1.1), bone age (group I, 13.1+/-1.3 yr; group II, 13.1+/-1.3) etiology, maximum stimulated GH, previous growth rate, and midparental target height. All subjects were in puberty (Tanner stage 2-5) at study entry. Of the 97 subjects enrolled, 45 were treated for 3 yr or more; 48 completed the study. Of the subjects who discontinued the study, the most common reason was satisfaction with their height, although others discontinued for adverse events or personal reasons. The frequency of patients who discontinued was the same in both groups. The primary efficacy analysis was the difference between dose groups for near-adult height, defined as the height attained at a bone age of 16 yr or more in males and 14 yr or more in girls; all subjects who qualified were included in the analysis. This difference was statistically significant at 4.6 cm by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA; P < 0.001; n = 75). For subjects who received at least 4 yr of rhGH treatment, the difference between dose groups at that time point was 5.7 cm (by ANCOVA, P = 0.024; n = 20). The mean height SD score at near-adult height was -0.7+/-0.9 in the standard dose group and 0.0+/-1.2 in the high dose group. At 36 months the cumulative change in height (centimeters) was 21.5+/-5.3 cm (group I) vs. 25.1+/-4.9 (group II; P < 0.001, by ANCOVA); the change in Bayley-Pinneau predicted adult height was 4.8+/-4.2 cm (group I) vs. 8.4+/-5.7 (group II; P = 0.032). Median plasma IGF-I concentrations at baseline were 427 microg/L (range, 204-649) in group I and 435 microg/L (range, 104-837) in group II; at 36 months they were 651 microg/L (range, 139-1079) in group I vs. 910 microg/L (range, 251-1843) in group II (P = NS). No difference in change in bone age was detected between groups at any interval. High dose rhGH was well tolerated, with a similar safety profile as standard dose treatment and no difference in hemoglobin A1c or glucose concentrations between groups. In summary, compared to conventional treatment, high dose rhGH therapy in adolescents 1) increased near-adult height and height SD scores significantly, 2) did not increase the rate of skeletal maturation, and 3) appears to be well tolerated and safe. In conclusion, high dose rhGH therapy may have a beneficial effect in adolescent GH-deficient patients, particularly those who are most growth retarded at the start of puberty.