Stability and Analgesic Efficacy of Di‐acetyl Morphine (Diamorphine) Compared with Morphine in Implanted Intrathecal Pumps In Vivo

The objective of this study was to investigate di‐acetyl morphine as an alternative opioid analgesic for use in implanted intrathecal drug delivery systems because of its greater solubility through evaluation of its stability in vivo and analgesic efficacy in the period between pump refills. Contents of intrathecal drug delivery system reservoirs (SynchroMed, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) that had been filled with di‐acetyl morphine dissolved in saline (21), bupivacaine (9), or in both bupivacaine and clonidine (19) were sampled in vivo between 1 and 125 days after refill. The samples were assayed for di‐acetyl morphine and its breakdown products by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography. Prospective daily numerical pain scores between pump refills, using 11‐point Likert scales, on 24 patients with implanted SynchroMed pumps (12 delivering di‐acetyl morphine in saline, 12 were delivering morphine in saline) were collected. Results showed that di‐acetyl morphine immediately started to decay to mono‐acetyl morphine in implanted Synchromed pumps with half‐life of 50 days. Mono‐acetyl morphine decayed to morphine with a maxima estimated at 125 days. There was no clinically significant change in average weekly pain scores for up to ten weeks in either group (range, 2.5 to 2.8 for diamorphine and 2.7 to 3.1 for morphine) (2‐way repeated ANOVA, F(9,220) = 0.98, n.s.). We conclude that di‐acetyl morphine and its breakdown products, 6 mono‐acetyl morphine and morphine, provide similar analgesia to morphine alone when administered by intrathecal pump for a period of at least ten weeks and may be a useful alternative when a more soluble agent is favored.     

Intrathecal Drug Delivery for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Chronic Pain in Children

ObjectivesManagement of refractory cancer-associated pain can be particularly challenging. Regional anesthesia is an alternative modality to treat acute and chronic refractory pain. Intrathecal (IT) drug delivery of opioids and other adjuncts has been used to treat refractory cancer-associated pain. This method has been shown to be relatively safe and effective, often associated with fewer systemic side effects when compared to oral or IV opioid administration. While intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are regularly used in the adult cancer population for the treatment of refractory, chronic pain, there is limited evidence of similar use in the pediatric setting.Materials and MethodsWe performed a systematic review using conventional Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology to identify studies reporting IT drug delivery for the treatment of pediatric cancer-related pain. The primary outcome was satisfaction with analgesia categorized as “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory.” Functional benefits, previous systemic pharmaceutical interventions, previous non-IT regional interventions, indication for IT drug delivery, IT drugs used, and method of delivery were collected.ResultsA total of 11 studies were identified, describing 16 patients with cancer-related pain treated with IT drug delivery. The average age of the cohort was 12.25 years, with ages ranging from 3 to 19 years. Most patients were adolescent (10/16). All patients had cancer diagnoses, with most patients suffering from solid tumor pain (14/16). Nearly all patients achieved satisfactory analgesia through IT drug delivery (15/16) and most reported functional benefits in addition to analgesia (13/16). Majority received IT drugs via external catheters (9/16). One severe complication of respiratory depression was reported, which resolved following naloxone administration.ConclusionsThere exist children with cancer whose pain is refractory to the standard approaches and may benefit from IT drug delivery. The existing data, although limited and of low tier evidence, suggest that IT drug delivery has been effective in the pediatric cancer population.     

Chemical Stability of Admixtures Combining Ziconotide With Baclofen During Simulated Intrathecal Administration

Objective. To determine the stability of admixtures combining ziconotide with commercially formulated or powdered baclofen during simulated intrathecal infusion under laboratory conditions at 37°. Materials and Methods. Admixtures of ziconotide (25 µg/mL) with commercially formulated (1.5 mg/mL) or powdered (2.0 mg/mL) baclofen were stored in implantable intrathecal pumps at 37°. Drug concentrations were determined with high‐performance liquid chromatography, and the length of time that the concentrations of both drugs remained ≥90% and ≥80% of initial (ie, the 90% and 80% stability, respectively) was estimated based on lower 95% confidence bounds obtained via linear regression. Results. Baclofen was stable in both admixtures. In the commercially formulated baclofen admixture, the mean ziconotide concentration declined to 82.2% of initial in 30 days; the estimates for 90% and 80% stability were 12 and 29 days, respectively. In the powdered baclofen admixture, the mean ziconotide concentration declined to 87.4% of initial in 30 days; the estimates for 90% and 80% stability were 20 and 41 days, respectively. Conclusion. Ziconotide–baclofen admixtures were more stable when prepared using powdered baclofen rather than a commercial baclofen formulation.     

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Pain Control: Insights on Current Contemporary Practices in the US

ObjectivesAmong patients with cancer with moderate to severe, intractable pain, intrathecal drug delivery using an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) offers effective pain control. In this study, we evaluate the trends of IDDS therapy among patients with cancer, associated comorbidities, complications, and outcomes, using a large representative US administrative inpatient data base.Materials and MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data base contains data from 48 states and the District of Columbia. The NIS was used to identify patients with cancer who underwent IDDS implantation between 2016 and 2019. Patients with cancer with intrathecal pumps for the treatment of chronic pain were identified using administrative codes. Baseline demographics, hospital characteristics, type of cancer associated with IDDS implantation, palliative care encounters, hospitalization costs, length of stay, and prevalence of bone pain were evaluated in the study.ResultsA total of 22,895 (0.32%) individuals with hospital admission for IDDS surgery were included for analysis among 7.06 million individuals with cancer in the final cohort. The IDDS cohort consisted of patients predominantly in the 65-to-79 years age group (40.49%), female sex (50.42%), and Caucasian ethnicity (75.82%). The top five cancers in patients receiving IDDS were lung (27.15%), colorectal (24.9%), liver (16.44%), bone (8.01%), and liver (7.99%) cancer. In addition, the length of stay was six days (interquartile range [IQR] four–nine days) and the median cost of hospital admission was $29,062 (IQR $19,413–$42,261) in the patients who received an IDDS. These factors were greater than those in patients without IDDS.ConclusionsA very few patients with cancer received IDDS in the US during the study period. Despite recommendations supporting its use, there are significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in IDDS use.     

Initial Intrathecal Dose Titration and Predictors of Early Dose Escalation in Patients With Cancer Using a 100:1 Oral to Intrathecal Morphine Conversion Ratio

ObjectivePain is common in patients with advanced cancer, and intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) has been successfully used for recalcitrant pain. We report on our experience using a 100:1 oral-to-intrathecal morphine conversion ratio for initial dosing and factors predictive of early dose escalation.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) data base at the Huntsman Cancer Institute-University of Utah in cancer patients initiated on IDD with morphine or hydromorphone. Demographic characteristics, preoperative opioid use, and initial and hospital discharge IDD settings were collected.ResultsA total of 275 patients were identified between June 2014 and May 2020. The median oral-to-intrathecal morphine conversion ratio for initial IDD dosing was 105.5:1 (interquartile range [IQR] 90–120, range 75–150). No serious adverse effects including respiratory depression or sedation were noted and the median length of stay was one night (IQR 1–2, range 1–22). Ninety-six percent of patients discontinued opioids immediately following IDDS implant. Initial IDD dosing was adequate in 42% of patients. Dose reduction was required in 4% prior to discharge due to nausea, patient request, weakness, pruritus, or urinary retention. Dose escalation was required in 54%, with a median dose increase of 66.7% (IQR 33–150%, range 5–1150%). Patients in the highest quartile of dose escalation, ≥70% between IDD initiation and discharge, had associations with younger age, higher preoperative opioid use, and inpatient status. No significant associations were found in patients who required dose reduction as compared to other patients.ConclusionsAn oral-to-intrathecal morphine conversion ratio of approximately 100:1 for initiation of IDD in patients with cancer pain was safe and well tolerated and may facilitate rapid elimination of systemic opioids. Dose reduction was rare, while a majority of patients required further dose escalation prior to discharge.     

Chemical Stability of an Admixture Combining Ziconotide and Bupivacaine During Simulated Intrathecal Administration

Objective. To determine the stability of an admixture combining ziconotide with bupivacaine hydrochloride during simulated intrathecal infusion under laboratory conditions at 37°. Materials and Methods. An admixture containing ziconotide (25 µg/mL) and bupivacaine hydrochloride (5 mg/mL) was stored in SynchroMed® II pumps at 37° and in control vials at either 37° or 5°. Using high‐performance liquid chromatography, drug concentrations were determined from samples obtained at varying intervals during the 30‐day study. Results. After 30 days, pump ziconotide and bupivacaine hydrochloride concentrations measured an average of 86.9% and 99.4% of their initial concentrations, respectively. Control vials displayed similar degradation rates for both drugs. Statistical evaluation of the ziconotide 95% confidence interval indicated that the ziconotide concentration would meet or exceed 90% and 80% of initial concentration for 22 days and 45 days, respectively. Conclusions. An admixture containing 25 µg/mL ziconotide and 5 mg/mL bupivacaine hydrochloride was 90% stable for 22 days and 80% stable for 45 days (extrapolated) in SynchroMed® II infusion pumps.     

Chemical Stability of Admixtures Combining Ziconotide with Morphine or Hydromorphone During Simul ated Intrathecal Administration

Objective. To determine the stability of admixtures combining ziconotide with morphine or hydromorphone under simulated intrathecal infusions. Materials and Methods. Admixtures of ziconotide (25 µg/mL) with morphine or hydromorphone (both at 35 mg/mL) were stored in Medtronic SynchroMed® II pumps at 37°C, and in control vials at 37°C and 5°C. Drug concentrations were determined using high‐performance liquid chromatography. Results. The ziconotide pump concentration with morphine declined to 79% of initial in 17 days, and to 88% of initial after 25 days with hydromorphone. Ziconotide concentrations in control vials stored at 37°C displayed similar rates of decay, but vials stored at 5°C exhibited no ziconotide loss. A statistical evaluation of the two combinations shows ziconotide–hydromorphone retaining 80% stability for 40 days (extrapolated), compared to 15 days for ziconotide–morphine. Morphine and hydromorphone were stable in the presence of ziconotide under all conditions. Conclusions. Ziconotide–hydromorphone admixtures were more stable than ziconotide–morphine admixtures.     

Initiation of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Dramatically Reduces Systemic Opioid Use in Patients With Advanced Cancer

ObjectivesPain is common in cancer, affecting more than 70% of patients with advanced disease. Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are a well-established treatment for patients with refractory cancer pain, improving pain control and reducing associated side effects. To date, details of systemic opioid use before and after IDDS implant have not been reported.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients at Huntsman Cancer Institute-University of Utah treated with IDDS for cancer pain from May 2014 to May 2018. Oral, transdermal, and parenteral opioid use before IDDS implant was compared to use 30 days postoperatively.ResultsA total of 173 patients were included, 93% with stage IV disease. The pre-implant median daily oral morphine equivalent (OME) was 240 mg (interquartile range 130–390, range 0–2616 mg). OME doses >200 mg/day were required by 57% of patients, and >500 mg OME by 19% of patients. The post-implant median OME was 0 mg (interquartile range 0–0, range 0–480 mg) and 82.6% of patients discontinued systemic opioids completely. 11.0% of patients used <100 mg OME, and only 1.7% of patients used >200 mg OME. Mean OME decreased by 94% following IDDS implant (p < 0.0001) and all patients who continued to use systemic opioids required a lower OME compared to pre-implant.ConclusionsIn the largest cohort of patients with advanced cancer and refractory pain treated with IDDS, implantation was associated with a dramatic reduction in systemic opioid use 30 days postoperatively, with a large majority of patients discontinuing systemic opioids. Those patients that continued systemic opioids utilized significantly lower doses as compared to their pre-implant dose.     

Chemical Stability of Ziconotide‐Clonidine Hydrochloride Admixtures With and Without Morphine Sulfate During Simulated Intrathecal Administration

Objective. To determine the stability of ziconotide–clonidine hydrochloride admixtures with and without morphine sulfate during simulated intrathecal infusion under laboratory conditions at 37°. Materials and Methods. Admixtures of ziconotide (25 µg/mL) and clonidine hydrochloride (2 mg/mL) with and without morphine sulfate (35 mg/mL) were stored in Medtronic SynchroMed® II pumps at 37°. Pumps were sampled immediately after filling and at four additional time points over the course of 28 (ziconotide–clonidine hydrochloride admixture) or 20 (ziconotide–clonidine hydrochloride–morphine sulfate admixture) days. Drug concentrations were determined using high‐performance liquid chromatography. Results. Ziconotide concentration exceeded 97% of initial at all time points when combined with clonidine alone; statistical evaluation indicated that both ziconotide and clonidine concentrations would remain above 90% of initial for more than 60 days. When compounded with both clonidine and morphine, ziconotide and clonidine concentrations declined; statistical evaluation indicated that the ziconotide concentration was 70% of initial after 20 days, and that clonidine would remain 90% stable for 42 days. Morphine was stable in the presence of ziconotide and clonidine. Conclusions. A ziconotide‐clonidine admixture was 90% stable for 60 days (extrapolated), and a ziconotide‐clonidine‐morphine admixture was 70% stable for 20 days.     

Intrathecal Ziconotide in the Treatment of Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: A Randomized,Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trial

Objective. The safety and efficacy of intrathecal (IT) ziconotide was studied in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Materials and Methods. Patients (169 ziconotide, 86 placebo) with severe chronic nonmalignant pain unresponsive to conventional therapy and a visual analog scale of pain intensity (VASPI score) ≥ 50 mm were treated over a 6‐day period in an inpatient hospital setting. Initial starting dose was 0.4 µg/hour and was titrated to analgesia or intolerance (maximum dose 7.0 µg/hour). The starting and maximum doses were reduced to 0.1 µg/hour and 2.4 µg/hour, respectively, due to adverse events (AEs). Results. The mean percent reduction in VASPI score from baseline was 31.2% and 6.0% for ziconotide‐ and placebo‐treated patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). During the initial titration phase, a significantly greater percentage of patients in the ziconotide group compared to the placebo group reported AEs, including abnormal gait, amblyopia, dizziness, nausea, nystagmus, pain, urinary retention, and vomiting. Conclusion. Ziconotide provided significant analgesia in patients for whom conventional therapy failed. However, there was a considerable incidence of ziconotide‐associated AEs due to the rapid titration and high doses administered.     

Continuous Intrathecal Infusion of Ziconotide for Treatment of Chronic Malignant and Nonmalignant Pain Over 12 Months: A Prospective,Open‐label Study

Objectives. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of long‐term intrathecal (IT) ziconotide infusion. Materials and Methods. In this prospective study, 155 patients with severe chronic pain (48 with malignant pain, 107 with nonmalignant pain) who had been responsive to short‐term IT ziconotide in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study received long‐term, open‐label IT ziconotide monotherapy. Efficacy assessments included the mean percentage change on the visual analog scale of pain intensity from baseline in the study of origin; safety was monitored by adverse event (AE) reports, periodic laboratory tests, and vital sign measurements. Results. At the last available observation, the visual analog scale of pain intensity scores had decreased by a mean of 36.9% from baseline in the short‐term trial (N = 144; 95% CI: 30.1–43.7%; p < 0.0001). The mean IT ziconotide dose remained stable over 12 months in the 31 patients who participated in the study for ≥ one year. Ziconotide‐related AEs were reported in 147 out of 155 patients (94.8%); 39.4% of patients discontinued treatment because of AEs, the majority of which were considered ziconotide related. Conclusions. Ziconotide IT monotherapy provided patients with analgesia for 12 months in this open‐label study, with an acceptable benefit/risk profile and no evidence of tolerance.     

Complications of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems

Objectives. To report complications associated with implant of the intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS). Patients and Methods. A retrospective review of the implant database was undertaken to determine various complications associated with the IDDS. A total of 122 patients were reviewed, 97 included in the final analysis, 25 excluded due to incomplete data. The complications of excluded patients were reviewed separately. The complications were divided in to categories pharmacologic, equipment, procedural, programming errors and psychological. The drugs used were morphine, dilaudid, fentanyl, sufentanil, baclofen, and marcaine. Results. There were 60 men and 37 women. A total of 43 patients reported various complications. Most common were transient pharmacologic side effects (n= 33), procedural (n= 5), equipment (n= 16), programming (n= 2), and psychological (n= 3). The most serious procedural complication was Staphylococcus aureus meningitis (n= 1). Catheter disconnection and leakage was noted in (n= 6) patients. Two programming errors were related to increase in drug concentration with failure to reduce the dose. Seven pumps were explanted, including three due to distorted body image. Conclusion. IDDS are effective and safe devices for pain management. The complications associated with implants are mostly pharmacological and transient.