Survival comparision of three-dimensional radiotherapy alone with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-surgical esophageal carcinoma

PurposeRadiotherapy is the main treatment method for patients with locally advanced, unresectable esophageal cancer. The aim of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) using 3D radiotherapy (3DRT) alone with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in 296 non-surgical esophageal carcinoma patients.Patents and methodsOver 10 years, of the 480 patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with 3DRT with or without chemotherapy, 148 patients each comprised 3DRT and CCRT groups after propensity score matching.ResultsThe 5- and 10-year OS (P = 0.337) and PFS (P = 0.715) rates for 3DRT alone were 22.0%, 14.4% and 26.1%, 23.2%, respectively, compared with 28.8%, 18.6% and 34.7%, 29.1% for CCRT, respectively. CCRT did not improve 5-year and 10-year OS or PFS in 60–70 Gy group (OS: 27.5% and 25.2%; 17.9% and 17.0%, P = 0.938; PFS: 38.3% and 31.8%; 31.9% and 27.8%, P = 0.890) nor reduce 10-year hematogenous metastasis (31.7% and 28.3%, P = 0.698). CCRT improved 5-year OS and PFS of 50.0–59.9 Gy group (OS: 33.3% and 12.0%, P = 0.029; PFS: 33.1% and 10.6%, P = 0.081). For 3DRT, the 5-year OS and PFS rates were significantly better in the 60–70 Gy group (P = 0.017) compared with 50.0–59.9 Gy group (P = 0.002). For CCRT group, 5-year OS and PFS favored the 50.0–59.9 Gy group, but the difference was insignificant. Major toxicities were greater with CCRT compared with 3DRT.ConclusionFor non-surgical esophageal carcinoma patients, 3DRT combined with CCRT was effective in prolonging both OS and PFS.     

Transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A single center experience including 221 patients

BackgroundHepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem in Egypt as well as in many countries. Transarterial chemoemoblization (TACE) is a treatment modality applicable to locally advanced HCC beyond surgery or ablative therapies and is associated with survival improvements. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of TACE in our center over the past four years.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study that included 221 patients with locally advanced HCC treated with TACE in a single center between the years 2007 and 2010. The median age was 57 years with male predominance. Liver cirrhosis, viral hepatitis and Bilharziasis were encountered in 64%, 31% and 8% of patients, respectively. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (67%). Most cases were diagnosed based on radiology (57%) with a TNM stage I or II (73%) and a median AFP value of 150 ng/mL.Results221 patients received 440 cycles of TACE with a median of 2 cycles per patient. Cisplatin and doxorubicin (50 mg per cycle, each) were the most commonly used drugs. Impaired liver function was the most common toxicity. Liver cell failure occurred in 17% of patients. An objective tumor response was achieved in 44% of cases. The median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% CI, 13–19 months) and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI, 4.3–7.8 months). Responding patients, Child-Pugh class A and patients receiving standard doses of chemotherapy had a significantly better OS than their counterparts. Only Child-Pugh class A was associated with significantly longer PFS (p < 0.001).ConclusionTACE produces reasonable responses and fair survival rates in locally advanced HCC but with noticeable toxicities. Proper patients’ selection and prompt liver support are mandates for improving TACE outcomes.     

Phase III study of sorafenib after transarterial chemoembolisation in Japanese and Korean patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundIn Japan and South Korea, transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is an important locoregional treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has been shown effective and safe in patients with advanced HCC. This phase III trial assessed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in Japanese and Korean patients with unresectable HCC who responded to TACE.MethodsPatients (n = 458) with unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis and ?25% tumour necrosis/shrinkage 1–3 months after 1 or 2 TACE sessions were randomised 1:1 to sorafenib 400 mg bid or placebo and treated until progression/recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end-point was time to progression/recurrence (TTP). Secondary end-point was overall survival (OS).FindingsBaseline characteristics in the two groups were similar; >50% of patients started sorafenib >9 weeks after TACE. Median TTP in the sorafenib and placebo groups was 5.4 and 3.7 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR), 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–1.09; P = 0.252). HR (sorafenib/placebo) for OS was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.69–1.64; P = 0.790). Median daily dose of sorafenib was 386 mg, with 73% of patients having dose reductions and 91% having dose interruptions. Median administration of sorafenib and placebo was 17.1 and 20.1 weeks, respectively. No unexpected adverse events were observed.InterpretationThis trial, conducted prior to the reporting of registrational phase III trials, found that sorafenib did not significantly prolong TTP in patients who responded to TACE. This may have been due to delays in starting sorafenib after TACE and/or low daily sorafenib doses.     

A randomised,open label phase III trial with nimotuzumab,an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody in the treatment of newly diagnosed adult glioblastoma

PurposeA randomised, open label phase III trial was conducted to evaluate efficacy of nimotuzumab, a monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) added to standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Patients and methods149 glioblastoma patients stratified as with or without residual tumour were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous nimotuzumab 400 mg weekly added to standard radiochemotherapy followed by 400 mg biweekly after twelve weeks or standard radiochemotherapy. Progression status after 52 weeks (12moPFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on Macdonald criteria were co-primary and overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life secondary end-points.Results142 patients were evaluated for efficacy (per protocol cohort). 12moPFS was 25.6% in the experimental arm and 20.3% in the control group. In residual tumour patients (n = 81) median PFS was 5.6 versus 4.0 months, (hazard ratio (HR), 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55–1.37), for patients without residual tumour (n = 61) it was 10.6 versus 9.9 months, (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.57–1.77). Median OS in patients with residual tumour was 19.5 versus 16.7 months, (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.52–1.57; P = 0.7061), for patients without 23.3 versus 21.0 months (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41–1.44; P = 0.4068). A small cohort of MGMT non-methylated patients with residual tumour showed PFS of 6.2 versus 4.0 months (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.35–1.67; P = 0.4997) and OS of 19.0 versus 13.8 months (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.27–1.64; P = 0.3648). EGF-R amplification did not correlate with clinical efficacy of nimotuzumab. Nimotuzumab was well tolerated.ConclusionThis study, albeit negative, contains hypothesis generating signals supporting evaluation of correlative, efficacy-predicting tumour parameters for nimotuzumab in the treatment of glioblastoma.     

Therapeutic effects and prognostic factors in high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with chemoembolisation for larger hepatocellular carcinoma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) in the treatment of larger hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Eighty-nine (89) patients with unrespectable larger HCC were randomised into a TACE group (n = 45) and a TACE plus HIFU group (n = 44). Therapeutic effects were assessed at follow-up with physical examination, level of serum α-fetoprotein and computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were followed up to observe long-term therapeutic effects and evaluated prognostic factors for survival. No severe complication was observed. Follow-up images showed that total effective rate in tumour response accounted for 72.8% in the TACE–HIFU group, which were significantly higher than that of TACE group (44.5%, P < 0.05). The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates for the TACE–HIFU group were 72.7%, 50.0%, 31.8% and 11.4%, respectively; correspondingly, for the TACE group were 47.2%, 16.7%, 2.8% and 0%, respectively (P < 0.01). The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates for the TACE–HIFU group were 34.1%, 18.2%, 9.1% and 0%, respectively; correspondingly, for the TACE group were 13.9%, 5.6%, 0% and 0%, respectively (P < 0.01). TNM stage, portal vein tumour thrombosis and Child-Pugh classification each had a significant effect on the survival. HIFU ablation combined with TACE is safe, effective and a promising approach for the treatment of larger HCC.     

Sequential therapy for the locally advanced larynx and hypopharynx cancer subgroup in TAX 324: survival,surgery, and organ preservation

BackgroundLocally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers (LHC) represent a group of cancers for which surgery, laryngectomy-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) are clinically meaningful end points.Patients and methodsThese outcomes were analyzed in the subgroup of assessable LHC patients enrolled in TAX 324, a phase III trial of sequential therapy comparing docetaxel plus cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) against cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF), followed by chemoradiotherapy.ResultsAmong 501 patients enrolled in TAX 324, 166 had LHC (TPF, n = 90; PF, n = 76). Patient characteristics were similar between subgroups. Median OS for TPF was 59 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 31–not reached] versus 24 months (95% CI: 13–42) for PF [hazard ratio (HR) for death: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41–0.94; P = 0.024]. Median PFS for TPF was 21 months (95% CI: 12–59) versus 11 months (95% CI: 8–14) for PF (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45–0.97; P = 0.032). Among operable patients (TPF, n = 67; PF, n = 56), LFS was significantly greater with TPF (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.37–0.95; P = 0.030). Three-year LFS with TPF was 52% versus 32% for PF. Fewer TPF patients had surgery (22% versus 42%; P = 0.030).ConclusionsIn locally advanced LHC, sequential therapy with induction TPF significantly improved survival and PFS versus PF. Among operable patients, TPF also significantly improved LFS and PFS. These results support the use of sequential TPF followed by carboplatin chemoradiotherapy as a treatment option for organ preservation or to improve survival in locally advanced LHC.     

Five-fraction HDR brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A monocentric experience

PurposeThe 5-fraction scheme (5 × 5–5.5 Gy) is a common High-Dose Rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy regimen for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Yet, its equivalence with Pulse-Dose rate (PDR) schemes remains unproved. The present study aimed at reporting on the outcome of LACC patients treated with 5-fraction HDR brachytherapy.Materials and methodsThe medical records of all consecutive patients treated with curative-intent HDR brachytherapy for a LACC in a French Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsThirty-eight LACC patients underwent a 5-fraction intracavitary HDR brachytherapy between 2015 and 2019 (median dose = 25 Gy/5 fractions, following external-beam radiotherapy). Median age at diagnosis was 60 (range: 29–87). Thirty-one patients (81.5%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy. Tumor stages ranged from 3 IB2 (7.8%), 4 IB3 (10.5%), 4 IIA2 (10.5%), 12 IIB (31.7%), 1 IIIA (2.6%), 2 IIIB (5.3%), 7 IIIC1 (18.5%), 4 IIIC2 (10.5%), 1 IVA (2.6%) (2018 FIGO). Median D90% to CTV_HR reached 79.5 Gy (EQD2). Median D90% to CTV_IR reached 59.5 Gy (EQD2). Median Bladder D2cc was 69.8 Gy (EQD2). Median Rectum D2cc was 58.3 Gy (EQD2). Acute/late grade 3 toxicity was reported in one patient (2.6%). No grade 4–5 toxicity occurred. At a median 38 months follow-up, 10 patients (26.3%) had local (n = 7, 18.4%), nodal (n = 6, 15.7%) and/or distant (n = 7, 18.4%) relapse. Three-year overall survival rate was of 81.6%.ConclusionThe 5-fraction HDR scheme was well tolerated even in frail patients. Three-year local control was lower than expected. Treatment (absence of parametrial interstitial implants and use of cervical EBRT boost) and patients’ characteristics (age, comorbidities) may explain such results.     

Tamoxifen compared to best supportive care in advanced hepatocelluar carcinoma: A retrospective matched-cohort study

BackgroundHepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer worldwide as well as in Egypt with hepatitis B and C, alcohol and aflatoxins being the commonest risk factors. Tamoxifen was initially reported to confer a marginal survival benefit in advanced HCC. However, later reports declined any benefit.ObjectiveTo study the impact of tamoxifen on overall survival (OS) compared to best supportive care (BSC) in Egyptian patients with advanced HCC.MethodsThis retrospective matched-cohort study was conducted at Tanta Cancer Center (TCC), Egypt where 116 advanced HCC cases treated with tamoxifen were compared to TNM stage and Child-Pugh class matched 116 HCC cases who received BSC.ResultsThe median OS in the tamoxifen group was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7–11.9 months) compared to 8.7 months (95%CI, 6.8–10.6) in the BSC group (p = 0.758). With univariate analyses, it was shown that absence of fatigue, Child-Pugh class A, single tumors, less advanced tumors (T2), and absence of metastases (M0), had significantly better OS than their counterparts. Multivariate analysis showed that absence of fatigue, Child-Pugh class A and T2 tumors were independent prognostic factors affecting OS. Tamoxifen produced partial response and clinical stabilization in one% and 16% of cases, respectively. The median PFS with tamoxifen was 7.2 months (95%CI, 5.2–9.5).ConclusionsTamoxifen did not show any OS advantage in Egyptian patients with advanced HCC. Use of this drug is discouraged.     

Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumours of the liver: Radiation-induced liver disease,incidence and predictive factors

PurposeRobotic stereotactic body radiation therapy is a new option to treated unresecable liver tumours. The objectives were to assess the tolerance of this technique, to identify predictive factors for toxicity and evaluate the efficiency of this treatment.Patients and methodsFrom June 2010 to November 2012, robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy was proposed for 56 patients with unresecable hepatocellular carcinomas (23 patients) or hepatic metastases (41 patients). Two or less hepatic lesions, lesion size under 75 mm and WHO score under 3 were selection criteria. The prescribed dose was 45 Gy/3 fractions or 60 Gy/3 fractions. The primary end-point was toxicity, using the radiation-induced liver disease definition and to identify predictive factors. Secondary end-points were in-field local control and overall survival.ResultsThe median follow-up was 12.5 months. The one-year local control rate and the one-year overall survival rate were 64% [CI95%: 48.2 to 76.5%] and 89% [CI95%: 76 to 95%], respectively. For patient treated with a total dose of 60 Gy, no one experienced recurrence. According to the definition we took, radiation-induced liver disease rate was 0 or 9%. A lesion size at least 35 mm was a predictive factor to liver toxicity (P = 0.01).ConclusionUsing robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy, the incidence of radiation-induced liver disease is weak and spontaneously reversible. Prospective studies are required to put in evidence other predictive factors of radiation-induced liver disease and confirm the optimal dose treatment.     

Association between pretreatment retention rate of indocyanine green 15 min after administration and life prognosis in patients with HCC treated by proton beam therapy

PurposeThe Child-Pugh score is often used to judge the outcome of radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The retention rate of indocyanine green 15 min after administration (ICG R15) can also be used to predict prognosis after liver resection. We evaluated the utility of ICG R15 for prediction of outcomes after proton beam therapy (PBT) for HCC.Methods and materialsA retrospective evaluation was performed in 250 patients who received PBT between 2002 and 2007. The patients (178 males and 72 females) had a median age of 71 years (range: 43–88). Child-Pugh categories were A (score 5–6), B (7–9), and C (10–15) in 197, 51, and 2 patients, respectively. ICG scores were 0–<10, 10–<20, 20–<30, 30–<40 and ⩾40 in 27, 99, 59, 28 and 37 patients, respectively; including 26, 92, 45, 16 and 18 Child-Pugh A patients and 1, 8, 14, 11, and 17 Child-Pugh B patients, respectively. Survival times from the start of PBT were compared between Child-Pugh A and B patients, and among each ICG group.ResultsThe median survival times were 61 months (95% CI: 50–72 months) in all patients, and 64 and 20 months in Child-Pugh A and B patients, respectively (p = 0.001), The 3-year survival rates were 72%, 72%, 75%, 63%, and 26% in patients with ICG scores of 0–<10, 10–<20, 20–<30, 30–<40, and ⩾40 (p = 0.001); 70%, 75%, 77%, 65%, and 38% in these respective groups in Child-Pugh A patients (p = 0.02); and 100%, 57%, 67%, 36%, and 14% in Child-Pugh B patients (p = 0.173, not significant). Multivariate analysis showed that low ICG R15 and the absence of portal vein tumor thrombus were associated with good survival.ConclusionsPretreatment ICG R15 is a useful prognostic factor for prediction of outcome of PBT in HCC patients, especially in those with Child-Pugh A liver function.     

Effective local control of advanced soft tissue sarcoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: A single institutional experience

PurposeThere is a sound theoretical basis but little clinical evidence substantiating the benefits of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with two-drug chemotherapy for locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Our five-year data on the feasibility and effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with systemically effective doses of adriamycin and ifosfamide combined is presented here.Patients and methodsBetween 2000 and 2011, 53 patients with UICC (2010) stage I (n = 1, 1.9%), II (n = 12, 22.7%) or III (n = 40, 75.5%) nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with ifosfamide (1.5 g/m²/day, d1–5, q28) and doxorubicin (50 mg/m²/day, d3, q28) plus concurrent radiotherapy with a target dose of 50–64 Gy (median 60 Gy). The treatment of 34 patients (64.2%) was combined with hyperthermia.ResultsAt five years, the local control rate was 89.9% (± 5.7%), distant metastasis-free survival 66.6% (± 7.6%), and survival 83.3% (± 6%). The R0 resection rate was 81.1%. Radiotherapy was completed as planned in all patients and chemotherapy in 42/53 (70.2%). Grades III (n = 21, 29.6%) and IV (n = 18, 34%) leukopenia was the main acute adverse event. All acute and chronic non-hematologic toxicities were moderate.ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma is associated with good feasibility, manageable acute and late toxicities, and high local efficacy.     

KRAS mutations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer,but are not predictive for benefit with cediranib

PurposeThe prognostic potential of KRAS mutations in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and the impact of KRAS mutation status on the effectiveness of chemotherapy or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling inhibitor therapy remain unclear. KRAS mutation status was evaluated retrospectively as a potential prognostic/predictive marker of clinical outcomes using tumour samples from patients with metastatic CRC receiving cediranib or placebo plus FOLFOX/XELOX in a Phase III trial (HORIZON II; NCT00399035).MethodsKRAS codon 12 and 13 mutation analyses were performed using a commercially available, allele-specific, amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Retrospective analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to KRAS mutation status were performed for patients randomised to cediranib 20 mg or placebo.ResultsKRAS status was determined in 599/1076 patients (cediranib 20 mg, n = 285/502; cediranib 30 mg, n = 110/216; placebo, n = 204/358). Baseline characteristics were similar across KRAS mutant (n = 258; 24.0%), wild-type (n = 341; 31.7%) and status unknown (n = 477; 44.3%) groups. There was a trend towards improved PFS and OS in the wild-type versus mutant subgroups independent of treatment (cediranib 20 mg and placebo: PFS hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85 [median PFS: wild-type = 8.5 months; mutant = 8.3 months]; OS HR = 0.71 [median OS: wild-type = 20.9 months; mutant = 16.9 months]). Treatment effects were similar between KRAS subgroups for cediranib 20 mg versus placebo (PFS: wild-type HR = 0.78, mutant HR = 0.82; OS: wild-type HR = 0.92, mutant HR = 1.01).ConclusionData from this large randomised Phase III study show that KRAS codon 12/13 mutations have negative prognostic value in metastatic CRC patients receiving treatment with FOLFOX/XELOX, but KRAS mutation status is not predictive of treatment benefit with cediranib, using PFS or OS.     

Influence of non-measurable disease on progression-free survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundThe presence of non-measurable disease is common in metastatic breast cancer. It is unknown whether treatment effect on progression free survival (PFS) is consistent among patients with measurable and non-measurable disease.MethodsA systematic literature search identified phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in metastatic breast cancer that reported outcomes in patients with non-measurable and measurable disease. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were computed to compare the individual trial treatment effect on PFS in non-measurable versus measurable disease. Analyses were repeated for bone-only compared to non-bone-only disease and based on drug mechanism of action.ResultsAmong 82 RCTs that enrolled patients with non-measurable disease, data were available from 16 trials comprising 8516 patients. Treatment effect on PFS was similar in patients with non-measurable and measurable disease (HR for intra-study comparison = 1.01, p = 0.82). However, compared to non-bone-only disease, a significantly greater effect on PFS was seen in those with bone-only disease (HR 0.83, p = 0.03). Compared to patients with measurable disease, there was a greater effect on PFS in those with non-measurable disease in RCTs of signal transduction inhibitors and endocrine therapy (HR 0.74, p = 0.01) and a lesser effect on PFS in RCTs of antiangiogenic drugs (HR 1.34, p = 0.02). Comparable effect on PFS was shown in RCTs evaluating endocrine therapy (HR 1.13, p = 0.23) and chemotherapy (HR 0.73, p = 0.22).ConclusionsThere is variability in treatment effect on PFS in patients with measurable and non-measurable disease, especially those with bone-only disease. Standardization of PFS determination in these patients is warranted.     

Maintenance pazopanib versus placebo in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients non-progressive after first line chemotherapy: A double blind randomised phase III study of the lung cancer group,EORTC 08092 (EudraCT: 2010-018566-23, NCT01208064)

BackgroundSwitch maintenance is an effective strategy in the treatment of advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Pazopanib is an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). EORTC 08092 evaluated pazopanib given as maintenance treatment following standard first line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.MethodsPatients with non-progressive disease after 4–6 cycles of chemotherapy were randomised to receive either pazopanib 800 mg/day or matched placebo until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was overall survival and secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.ResultsA total of 600 patients were planned to be randomised. The trial was prematurely stopped following an early interim analysis, after 102 patients were randomised to pazopanib (n = 50) or placebo (n = 52). Median age was 64 years in both arms. Median overall survival was 17.4 months for pazopanib and 12.3 months for placebo (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–1.28]; p = 0.257). Median PFS was 4.3 months versus 3.2 months (HR 0.67, [95% CI 0.43–1.03], p = 0.068). PFS rates at 4 months were 56% and 45% respectively. The majority of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1–2. Grade 3–4 AEs (pazopanib versus placebo) were hypertension (38% versus 8%), neutropenia (8% versus 0%), and elevated SGPT (6% versus 0%). Of the patients randomised to pazopanib, 22% withdrew due to a treatment-related AE.ConclusionsSwitch maintenance with pazopanib following platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients had limited side-effects. This study was stopped due to lack of efficacy by stringent criteria for PFS at a futility interim analysis.     

First-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy for angiosarcoma and other soft tissue sarcoma subtypes: Pooled analysis of eleven European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group trials

BackgroundAngiosarcoma is a rare subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Doxorubicin is the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS. It is not known whether angiosarcoma response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy is different to other STS subtypes.MethodsPooled data were analysed from 11 prospective randomised and non-randomised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical trials of first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy for advanced STS. Baseline patient characteristics, chemotherapy response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of angiosarcoma patients were compared with other STS patients. Analysis was performed to identify factors prognostic for angiosarcoma response to chemotherapy, PFS and OS.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 4.2 years, data from 108 locally advanced and metastatic angiosarcoma patients and 2557 patients with other STS histologies were analysed. 25% of angiosarcoma patients had a complete or partial response to chemotherapy compared to 21% for other STS histotypes. The median PFS was 4.9 months and OS 9.9 months, which were not significantly different from other STS histotypes. In univariate analysis, bone metastases were an adverse prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–2.67; p = 0.036). Tumour grade was as an adverse prognostic factor for PFS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01–2.92; p = 0.044) and OS (HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.16–3.56; p = 0.011). Compared to single agent anthracyclines, doxorubicin + ifosfamide was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.86; p = 0.010) and OS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.018).ConclusionsAngiosarcoma response and survival following first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy was similar to other STS histotypes. Our analysis provides a useful measure of angiosarcoma response to chemotherapy for comparison with future clinical trials.     

Prior long response to androgen deprivation predicts response to next-generation androgen receptor axis targeted drugs in castration resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundThere is an urgent need for qualified predictive biomarkers of sensitivity for the treatments used in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We attempted to identify ready-to-use clinical predictors of improved outcome in metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) patients treated with next generation androgen receptor (AR) axis targeted drugs.Patients and methodsWe reviewed a cohort of patients who received AR axis targeted drugs for CRPC at two major French cancer centres. The predictive role of several clinical, biological and radiological parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) was studied.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 173 patients. Median duration of response to initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (time to castration resistance, TTCRPC) was 17.8 months. The 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate to AR axis targeted drugs was 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 6–27) and 41% (95% CI: 30–47) in patients with TTCRPC of under and over 12 months respectively (p = 0.005). Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.1–3.9) and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.6–7.8; HR: 0.58, p = 0.002). In patients treated with post-docetaxel enzalutamide (n = 57), median PFS was 2.8 months and 8.6 months, (Hazard ratio (HR) = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.6–5.8, p = 0.0016) according to TTCRPC, whereas no difference was observed in placebo-treated patients (n = 27). The 50% PSA response rate to enzalutamide was 8% (95% CI: 0–38) and 58% (95% CI: 42–73) in patients with a TTCRPC of under and over 12 months respectively (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe previous duration of response to ADT is a predictor of sensitivity to next generation AR axis targeted drugs in patients with mCRPC.     

Nintedanib for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (LUME-Colon 1): a phase III,international, randomized,placebo-controlled study

BackgroundAngiogenesis is critical to colorectal cancer (CRC) growth and metastasis. Phase I/II studies have demonstrated the efficacy of nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic CRC. This global, randomized, phase III study investigated the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with refractory CRC after failure of standard therapies.Patients and methodsEligible patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, with histologically/cytologically confirmed metastatic/locally advanced CRC adenocarcinoma unamenable to surgery and/or radiotherapy) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive nintedanib (200 mg twice daily) or placebo (twice daily), until disease progression or undue toxicity. Patients were stratified by previous regorafenib, time from onset of metastatic disease to randomization, and region. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by central review. Secondary end points included objective tumor response and disease control by central review.ResultsFrom October 2014 to January 2016, 768 patients were randomized; 765 were treated (nintedanib n = 384; placebo n = 381). Median follow-up was 13.4 months (interquartile range 11.1–15.7). OS was not improved [median OS 6.4 months with nintedanib versus 6.0 months with placebo; hazard ratio (HR), 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86–1.19; P = 0.8659]. There was a significant but modest increase in PFS with nintedanib versus placebo (median PFS 1.5 versus 1.4 months, respectively; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.49–0.69; P < 0.0001). There were no complete or partial responses. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of 384 nintedanib-treated patients and 93% of 381 placebo-treated patients. The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were liver-related AEs (nintedanib 16%; placebo 8%) and fatigue (nintedanib 9%; placebo 6%).ConclusionsThe study failed to meet both co-primary end points. Nintedanib did not improve OS and was associated with a significant but modest increase in PFS versus placebo. Nintedanib was well tolerated.ClinicalTrials.gov numberNCT02149108 (LUME-Colon 1).     

Overall survival with cisplatin–gemcitabine and bevacizumab or placebo as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised phase III trial (AVAiL)

BackgroundBevacizumab, the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent, provides clinical benefit when combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We report the final overall survival (OS) analysis from the phase III AVAiL trial.Patients and methodsPatients (n = 1043) received cisplatin 80 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² for up to six cycles plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg (n = 345), bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (n = 351) or placebo (n = 347) every 3 weeks until progression. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); OS was a secondary end point.ResultsSignificant PFS prolongation with bevacizumab compared with placebo was maintained with longer follow-up {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.75 (0.64–0.87), P = 0.0003 and 0.85 (0.73–1.00), P = 0.0456} for the 7.5 and 15 mg/kg groups, respectively. Median OS was >13 months in all treatment groups; nevertheless, OS was not significantly increased with bevacizumab [HR (95% CI) 0.93 (0.78–1.11), P = 0.420 and 1.03 (0.86–1.23), P = 0.761] for the 7.5 and 15 mg/kg groups, respectively, versus placebo. Most patients (∼62%) received multiple lines of poststudy treatment. Updated safety results are consistent with those previously reported.ConclusionsFinal analysis of AVAiL confirms the efficacy of bevacizumab when combined with cisplatin–gemcitabine. The PFS benefit did not translate into a significant OS benefit, possibly due to high use of efficacious second-line therapies.     

Biomarker assessment of the CBCSG006 trial: a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

BackgroundCBCSG006 trial reported the superior efficacy of cisplatin plus gemcitabine (GP) regimen than paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GT) regimen as first-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). This study focused on the updated survival data and the explorations of potential biomarkers for efficacy.Patients and methodsGerm-line mutations of homologous recombination (HR) panel, BRCA1/2 included, were evaluated in 55.9% (132/236) patients. PD-L1 expression was evaluated in 48.3% (114/236) patients. A nonparametric sliding-window subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) methodology was used to analyze the absolute survival benefits. All statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsMedian progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.46–9.00] months for GP arm and 6.07 (95% CI 5.32–6.83) months for GT arm (P = 0.005). No significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed. There was significant interaction between HR status and treatment for PFS and status of HR deficient significantly correlated with higher objective response rate (ORR) and longer PFS in GP arm than in GT arm (71.9% versus 38.7%, P = 0.008; 10.37 versus 4.30 months, P = 0.011). There was no significant interaction between germ-line BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) status and treatment for PFS. Patients with gBRCA1/2 mutation had numerically higher ORR and prolonged PFS in GP arm than in GT arm (83.3% versus 37.5%, P = 0.086; 8.90 versus 3.20 months, P = 0.459). There was no significant interaction between PD-L1 status and treatment for PFS, and no significant differences in ORR, PFS or OS between two arms regardless of PD-L1 status. In STEPP analysis, patients with lower composite risks had more absolute benefits in PFS than those with higher composite risks.ConclusionsGP regimen has superior efficacy than GT regimen as first-line chemotherapy for mTNBC patients. Germ-line mutations of BRCA1/2 and HR panel are possible biomarkers for better performance of cisplatin-based regimens. A composite risk model was developed to guide patient selection for GP treatment in TNBC patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01287624.