Primary Care Pediatrics and Public Health: Meeting the Needs of Today’s Children

The proportion of children suffering from chronic illnesses—such as asthma and obesity, which have significant environmental components—is increasing. Chronic disease states previously seen only in adulthood are emerging during childhood, and health inequalities by social class are increasing. Advocacy to ensure environmental health and to protect from the biological embedding of toxic stress has become a fundamental part of pediatrics. We have presented the rationale for addressing environmental and social determinants of children’s health, the epidemiology of issues facing children’s health, recent innovations in pediatric medical education that have incorporated public health principles, and policy opportunities that have arisen with the passage of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.In pediatrics, the acknowledgment of child development as a transactional process and ultimate determinant of adult capacity has important implications for the development of systems, practice models, and training. If we are to ensure children’s health and, ultimately, overall population well-being, childhood service systems must become responsive and coordinated on many levels; practitioners must develop multiple skills outside the traditional medical model; and training strategies must become innovative. Promoting access to effective health and health-related services is essential for achieving Healthy People 2020 objectives (the US Department of Health and Human Services’ set of health-promotion and disease-prevention goals to be achieved nationwide by 2020). There are many examples of shortfalls in adequacy of available services, effectiveness of care provided, organization of services, and focus on primary prevention. Up to 50% of developmental problems in children are not identified until school entry,1 more than 8 million children remain without health care coverage in the United States, and a much larger number have no regular source of health care except in emergencies.2 In addition to inadequate funding for appropriate services, the network of programs serving children is increasingly fragmented, difficult to navigate, and unresponsive.A major challenge for children’s and youths’ services is to develop more effective and efficient service integration models. In the present system, pediatricians tend to avoid asking parents about matters for which they feel inadequately trained and for which they are not aware of patient resources, including child development, obesity, breastfeeding, family violence, environmental health, and mental health. The system will not respond without adequately prepared clinician–advocates who recognize and understand these issues and their relationship to ultimate outcomes.     

Beneficent Persuasion: Techniques and Ethical Guidelines to Improve Patients’ Decisions

Physicians frequently encounter patients who make decisions that contravene their long-term goals. Behavioral economists have shown that irrationalities and self-thwarting tendencies pervade human decision making, and they have identified a number of specific heuristics (rules of thumb) and biases that help explain why patients sometimes make such counterproductive decisions. In this essay, we use clinical examples to describe the many ways in which these heuristics and biases influence patients’ decisions. We argue that physicians should develop their understanding of these potentially counterproductive decisional biases and, in many cases, use this knowledge to rebias their patients in ways that promote patients’ health or other values. Using knowledge of decision-making psychology to persuade patients to engage in healthy behaviors or to make treatment decisions that foster their long-term goals is ethically justified by physicians’ duties to promote their patients’ interests and will often enhance, rather than limit, their patients’ autonomy. We describe techniques that physicians may use to frame health decisions to patients in ways that are more likely to motivate patients to make choices that are less biased and more conducive to their long-term goals. Marketers have been using these methods for decades to get patients to engage in unhealthy behaviors; employers and policy makers are beginning to consider the use of similar approaches to influence healthy choices. It is time for clinicians also to make use of behavioral psychology in their interactions with patients.     

Primary care physicians’ perspective on financial issues and adult immunization in the Era of the Affordable Care Act

BackgroundFinancial barriers to adult vaccination are poorly understood. Our objectives were to assess among general internists (GIM) and family physicians (FP) shortly after Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation: (1) proportion of adult patients deferring or refusing vaccines because of cost and frequency of physicians not recommending vaccines for financial reasons; (2) satisfaction with reimbursement for vaccine purchase and administration by payer type; (3) knowledge of Medicare coverage of vaccines; and (4) awareness of vaccine-specific provisions of the ACA.MethodsWe administered an Internet and mail survey from June to October 2013 to national networks of 438 GIMs and 401 FPs.ResultsResponse rates were 72% (317/438) for GIM and 59% (236/401) for FP. Among physicians who routinely recommended vaccines, up to 24% of GIM and 30% of FP reported adult patients defer or refuse certain vaccines for financial reasons most of the time. Physicians reported not recommending vaccines because they thought the patient’s insurance would not cover it (35%) or the patient could be vaccinated more affordably elsewhere (38%). Among physicians who saw patients with this insurance, dissatisfaction (‘very dissatisfied’) was highest for payments received from Medicaid (16% vaccine purchase, 14% vaccine administration) and Medicare Part B (11% vaccine purchase, 11% vaccine administration). Depending on the vaccine, 36–71% reported not knowing how Medicare covered the vaccine. Thirty-seven percent were ‘not at all aware’ and 19% were ‘a little aware’ of vaccine-specific provisions of the ACA.ConclusionsPatients are refusing and physicians are not recommending adult vaccinations for financial reasons. Increased knowledge of private and public insurance coverage for adult vaccinations might position physicians to be more likely to recommend vaccines and better enable them to refer patients to other vaccine providers when a particular vaccine or vaccines are not offered in the practice.     

Primary Care Professionals’ Feedback on Smiles for Life Curriculum

To assess the value of Smiles for Life: A National Oral Health Curriculum (SFL) in influencing oral health practices of primary care professionals (PCPs). The National Maternal and Child Oral Health Resource Center’s Partnership for Integrating Oral Health Care into Primary Care (PIOHCPC) project is working with five project teams in Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, and Rhode Island that are integrating interprofessional oral health core clinical competencies into primary care practice. The competencies were developed to facilitate change in the clinical practice of PCPs working with vulnerable or underserved populations that lack or have limited access to oral health care. An initial PIOHCPC project requirement was for PCPs (physicians, nurse practitioners, nurse midwives, nurses) to complete at least two SFL courses based on their project population of focus (eg, pregnant women, children, adolescents). The curriculum consists of the following courses: Course 1: Relationship of Oral and Systemic Health; Course 2: Child Oral Health; Course 3: Adult Oral Health; Course 4: Acute Dental Problems; Course 5: Oral Health for Women: Pregnancy and Across the Lifespan; Course 6: Caries Risk Assessment, Fluoride Varnish, and Counseling; Course 7: The Oral Exam; and Course 8: Geriatric Oral Health. Three months after completion of the SFL courses, a 10-question feedback form was sent to PCPs. PCPs working in primary care settings (community health centers, local health department, medical center women’s health clinic) serving pregnant women, children, and adolescents who completed at least two SFL courses as part of the PIOHCPC project. Thirteen PCPs (three physicians, three nurse practitioners, three nurse midwives, four nurses) completed the feedback form. One hundred percent of respondents strongly agreed/agreed that SFL courses (1) reinforced the importance of oral health to a patient’s overall health and well-being, (2) increased their awareness of and familiarity with oral health issues in their patients, and (3) increased their confidence in integrating oral health care into primary care. Seventy-seven percent of respondents strongly agreed/agreed that SFL courses helped reduce barriers to incorporating oral health care into primary care. Sixty-two percent of respondents strongly agreed/agreed that integrating oral health care into primary care improved their patients’ oral health outcomes. The majority (ranging from 85 to 100 percent) of PCPs strongly agreed/agreed that SFL courses helped them integrate the interprofessional oral health core clinical competencies into primary care. Three months after completing SFL courses, PCPs indicated that the curriculum had a positive influence on oral health practices in the primary care setting. These findings are consistent with a 2017 study that examined SFL influence on clinical practice and found that the curriculum positively influenced oral health practices in the primary care setting. Additional feedback could be gathered 1 year post-training to assess retention of PCPs’ practices related to integrating oral health care into primary care. Oral health training is essential for enhancing PCPs’ knowledge and practices related to integrating oral health care into primary care. To respond to the need to integrate oral health care into primary care, SFL should be considered as a training for PCPs. Health Resources and Services Administration.     

Patients’ and Family Caregivers’ Goals for Care During Transitions Out of the Hospital

The aims of this study were to (a) describe the nature of patients’ goals upon discharge from hospital, family caregivers’ goals for their loved ones, and family caregivers’ goals for themselves; (b) determine the degree of concordance with respect to the three elicited goals; (c) ascertain goal attainment across the three elicited goals; and (d) examine factors predictive of goal attainment. Our findings support the position that eliciting patient and family caregiver goals and promoting goal attainment may represent an important step toward promoting greater patient and family caregiver engagement in their care.     

Introducing Parenting Support in Primary Care: Professionals’ Perspectives on the Implementation of a Positive Parenting Program

Journal of Prevention - While positive parenting programs are an initiative aligned with the Family-Centered Care model and the Council of Europe’s Recommendation on Positive Parenting,...     

Measuring Primary Care for Children of Latino Farmworkers: Reliability and Validity of the Parent’s Perceptions of Primary Care Measure (P3C)

This study evaluates the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Parents Perceptions of Primary Care measure (P3C) in an underserved population: children of Latino farm workers. Bilingual research assistants verbally administered the P3C, as well as a measure of child health-related quality of life (HRQL: the PedsQL 4.0) and demographic questions to 297 Latino farm worker parents of young children, in San Diego and Imperial Counties. The P3C was found to be feasible, as measured by a very low percent of missing/do not know values. Internal consistency reliability for the Total Scale and most subscales was strong. The P3Cs validity was demonstrated through factor analysis of the subscales, by showing that scores were lower for children without a regular physician and for children experiencing foregone health care, and by demonstrating that P3C scores were related to HRQL. The P3C can be useful to various stakeholders in measuring primary care for vulnerable populations.     

Pediatric Primary Care Providers’ Relationships with Mental Health Care Providers: Survey Results

Background

As many as 20 % of children have diagnosable mental health conditions and nearly all of them receive pediatric primary health care. However, most children with serious mental health concerns do not receive mental health services. This study tested hypotheses that pediatric primary care providers (PPCPs) in relationships with mental health providers would differ in their care of patients with mental health concerns when compared to PPCPs not in such relationships.

Objective

To explore differences between PPCPs who have relationships with mental health care providers and those who do not with regard to their care of children with mental health concerns.

Methods

Seventy-two PPCPs completed a mailed survey addressing topics such as comfort levels diagnosing and managing patients with behavioral health disorders, perceived barriers to care, activity related to prescribing psychotropic medications, and availability of consultation with mental health specialists. More than one-third (19 providers) of providers reported no specialized training in behavioral pediatrics and nearly 45 % (32 providers) indicated having a relationship or partnership with a mental health specialist.

Results

Those providers who reported relationships indicated greater availability of consultation and communication with psychiatric providers as well as telephone consultation with non-psychiatric mental health providers. All providers were more comfortable assessing as opposed to treating children with disorders, with the exception of attention disorders, which providers were comfortable with both treating and assessing. For all conditions, there was no main effect for partnership.

Conclusion

While partnerships may be associated with greater availability of consultation and communication, for this sample of PPCPs there was no evidence of advantage with respect to diagnosis and management. The paper concludes with a discussion of study limitations, the need for further research, and suggestions for practice.     

“Chaplains for Wellbeing” in Primary Care: A Qualitative Investigation of Their Perceived Impact for Patients’ Health and Wellbeing

The growing importance of professional chaplains in patient-centered care has raised questions about education for professional chaplaincy. One recommendation is that the curricula of Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) residency programs make use of the chaplaincy certification competencies. To determine the adoption of this recommendation, we surveyed CPE supervisors from 26 recently re-accredited, stipended CPE residency programs. We found the curricula of 38% of these programs had substantive engagement with the certification competencies, 38% only introduced students to the competences, and 23% of the programs made no mention of them. The majority of the supervisors (59%) felt engagement with the competencies should be required while 15% were opposed to such a requirement. Greater engagement with chaplaincy certification competencies is one of several approaches to improvements in chaplaincy education that should be considered to ensure that chaplains have the training needed to function effectively in a complex and changing healthcare environment.     

“Bring the Hoses to Where the Fire Is!”: Differential Impacts of Marginalization and Socioeconomic Status on COVID-19 Case Counts and Healthcare Costs

ObjectivesLocal health leaders and the Director General of the World Health Organization alike have observed that COVID-19 “does not discriminate.” Nevertheless, the disproportionate representation of people of low socioeconomic status among those infected resembles discrimination. This population-based retrospective cohort study examined COVID-19 case counts and publicly funded healthcare costs in Ontario, Canada, with a focus on marginalization.MethodsIndividuals with their first positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020, were linked to administrative databases and matched to negative/untested controls. Mean net (COVID-19–attributable) costs were estimated for 30 days before and after diagnosis, and differences among strata of age, sex, comorbidity, and measures of marginalization were assessed using analysis of variance tests.ResultsWe included 28 893 COVID-19 cases (mean age 54 years, 56% female). Most cases remained in the community (20 545, 71.1%) or in long-term care facilities (4478, 15.5%), whereas 944 (3.3%) and 2926 (10.1%) were hospitalized, with and without intensive care unit, respectively.Case counts were skewed across marginalization strata with 2 to 7 times more cases in neighborhoods with low income, high material deprivation, and highest ethnic concentration.Mean net costs after diagnosis were higher for males ($4752 vs $2520 for females) and for cases with higher comorbidity ($1394-$7751) (both P < .001) but were similar across levels of most marginalization dimensions (range $3232-$3737, all P ≥ .19).ConclusionsThis study suggests that allocating resources unequally to marginalized individuals may improve equality in outcomes. It highlights the importance of reducing risk of COVID-19 infection among marginalized individuals to reduce overall costs and increase system capacity.     

Primary Care Physician’s Knowledge of Ethnicity-Specific Guidelines for Obesity Diagnosis and Readiness for Obesity Intervention Among South Asian Indians

Many primary care physicians lack sufficient knowledge on current guidelines for overweight/obesity diagnosis among minority groups. We assessed physician knowledge and awareness on modified guidelines for identifying obesity among South Asian Indians (SAIs). Cross sectional survey of 183 physicians practicing in Houston, who reported on their knowledge on guidelines for obesity among SAIs, frequency of measurement of surrogate markers, self-reported competency in management of obesity, and readiness to seek training on obesity diagnosis among SAIs. 65% of physicians agree obesity is a growing problem among SAIs with only 9% of physicians reporting measuring waist circumference. Only 21% of physicians were aware of the recommended WHO modified BMI criteria and 41% the IDF criteria for waist circumference. SAI physicians had significantly higher knowledge compared to other physicians. 78% were ready to seek training on the modified guidelines across ethnicity and training. There is a low level of knowledge on ethnicity-specific guidelines for obesity diagnosis among physicians. There is however a readiness to learn, indicating the need for a physician awareness-training on current obesity guidelines, for various ethnic populations.     

Treatment Effects of a Primary Care Intervention on Parenting Behaviors: Sometimes It’s Relative

The goal of this brief report is to demonstrate the utility of quantifying parental discipline practices as relative frequencies in measuring changes in parenting behavior and relations to child behavior following intervention. We explored comparisons across methodological approaches of assessing parenting behavior via absolute and relative frequencies in measuring improvements in parent-reported disciplinary practices (increases in positive parenting practices in response to child behavior; decreases in inconsistent discipline and use of corporal punishment) and child behavior problems. The current study was conducted as part of a larger clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a collaborative care intervention for behavior problems, ADHD, and anxiety in pediatric primary care practices (Doctor Office Collaborative Care; DOCC). Participants were 321 parent-child dyads (M child age?=?8.00, 65 % male children) from eight pediatric practices that were cluster randomized to DOCC or enhanced usual care (EUC). Parents reported on their own discipline behaviors and child behavior problems. While treatment-related decreases in negative parenting were found using both the absolute and relative frequencies of parenting behaviors, results were different for positive parenting behaviors, which showed decreases when measured as absolute frequencies but increases when measured as relative frequencies. In addition, positive parenting was negatively correlated with child behavior problems when using relative frequencies, but not absolute frequencies, and relative frequencies of positive parenting mediated relations between treatment condition and outcomes. Our findings indicate that the methods used to measure treatment-related change warrant careful consideration.     

Cost,Utilization, and Quality of Care: An Evaluation of Illinois’ Medicaid Primary Care Case Management Program

PURPOSE

In 2006, Illinois established Illinois Health Connect (IHC), a primary care case management program for Medicaid that offered enhanced fee-for-service, capitation payments, performance incentives, and practice support. Illinois also implemented a complementary disease management program, Your Healthcare Plus (YHP). This external evaluation explored outcomes associated with these programs.

METHODS

We analyzed Medicaid claims and enrollment data from 2004 to 2010, covering both pre- and post-implementation. The base year was 2006, and 2006–2010 eligibility criteria were applied to 2004–2005 data to allow comparison. We studied costs and utilization trends, overall and by service and setting. We studied quality by incorporating Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures and IHC performance payment criteria.

RESULTS

Illinois Medicaid expanded considerably between 2006 (2,095,699 full-year equivalents) and 2010 (2,692,123). Annual savings were 6.5% for IHC and 8.6% for YHP by the fourth year, with cumulative Medicaid savings of $1.46 billion. Per-beneficiary annual costs fell in Illinois over this period compared to those in states with similar Medicaid programs. Quality improved for nearly all metrics under IHC, and most prevention measures more than doubled in frequency. Medicaid inpatient costs fell by 30.3%, and outpatient costs rose by 24.9% to 45.7% across programs. Avoidable hospitalizations fell by 16.8% for YHP, and bed-days fell by 15.6% for IHC. Emergency department visits declined by 5% by 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

The Illinois Medicaid IHC and YHP programs were associated with substantial savings, reductions in inpatient and emergency care, and improvements in quality measures. This experience is not typical of other states implementing some, but not all, of these same policies. Although specific features of the Illinois reforms may have accounted for its better outcomes, the limited evaluation design calls for caution in making causal inferences.     

Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Primary Care Patients: Does Risk Affect Screening Behavior?

Lifestyle factors including smoking, obesity, and diabetes can increase colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Controversy exists regarding screening rates in individuals at increased CRC risk. To examine the effect of risk on CRC screening in primary care, cross-sectional data collected during January 2006–July 2007 from 720 participants in 24 New Jersey primary care practices were analyzed. Participants were stratified by risk: high (personal/family history of CRC, history of polyps, inflammatory bowel disease), increased (obesity, Type II diabetes, current/former smokers), and average. Outcomes were up-to-date with CRC screening, receiving a physician recommendation for screening, and recommendation adherence. Chi-square and generalized linear modeling were used to determine the effect of independent variables on risk group and risk group on outcomes. Thirty-seven percent of participants were high-risk, 46% increased-risk, and 17% average-risk. Age, race, insurance, education, and health status were related to risk. High-risk participants had increased odds of being up-to-date with screening (OR 3.14 95% CI 1.85–5.32) and adhering to physician recommendation (OR 7.18 95% CI 3.58–14.4) compared to average-risk. Increased-risk participants had 32% decreased odds of screening (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.42–1.08). Low screening rates among increased-risk individuals highlight the need for screening interventions targeting these patients.     

The effect of commissioning on Portuguese Primary Health Care units’ performance: A four-year national analysis

BackgroundPortugal underwent a paradigmatic Primary Health Care (PHC) reform in 2005. The reform implemented better health information systems, goal-oriented management, pay-for-performance schemes, functional autonomy for the front-line units, and the general adoption of commissioning processes.Since the implementation of the reform, the same set of indicators have been monitored nationally every year. However, from 2014–2016, the five Regional Health Administrations could individually select part of set of indicators to be commissioned.As the same some indicators were used commissioned in some regions, but not in others, a natural experimental setting to observe the impact of commissioning on the results by comparing the performance of commissioned versus non-commissioned indicators emerged and the effects of commissioning on PHC performance could be evaluated.AimOur article aims to clarify the effect of commissioning on the results achieved by PHC units in Portugal following the implementation of the reform.ResultsIn general, the indicator values improved with time in the three types of units that existed after the reform. However, Model B Family Health Units (‘Unidades de Saúde Familiar’ or USFs that use pay-for-performance and are more mature) obtained the highest absolute indicator values, followed by Model A USFs (newer units with a fixed salary) and Personalised Health Care Units (‘Unidades de Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados’ that were created under the model before the reform and offer a fixed salary), respectively.ConclusionThe results show a general increase in indicators in all PHC units. However, the indicators used in the commissioning processes exhibited a greater increase. There was no evidence that the better results exhibited by the commissioned indicators were achieved at the expense of a detrimental effect on non-commissioned indicators.     

Working Under a Clinic-Level Quality Incentive: Primary Care Clinicians’ Perceptions

BACKGROUND

A key consideration in designing pay-for-performance programs is determining what entity the incentive should be awarded to—individual clinicians or to groups of clinicians working in teams. Some argue that team-level incentives, in which clinicians who are part of a team receive the same incentive based on the team’s performance, are most effective; others argue for the efficacy of clinician-level incentives. This study examines primary care clinicians’ perceptions of a team-based quality incentive awarded at the clinic level.

METHODS

This research was conducted with Fairview Health Services, where 40% of the primary care compensation model was based on clinic-level quality performance. We conducted 48 in-depth interviews to explore clinicians’ perceptions of the clinic-level incentive, as well as an online survey of 150 clinicians (response rate 56%) to investigate which entity the clinicians would consider optimal to target for quality incentives.

RESULTS

Clinicians reported the strengths of the clinic-based quality incentive were quality improvement for the team and less patient “dumping,” or shifting patients with poor outcomes to other clinicians. The weaknesses were clinicians’ lack of control and colleagues riding the coattails of higher performers. There were mixed reports on the model’s impact on team dynamics. Although clinicians reported greater interaction with colleagues, some described an increase in tension. Most clinicians surveyed (73%) believed that there should be a mix of clinic and individual-level incentives to maintain collaboration and recognize individual performance.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the important advantages and disadvantages of using incentives based upon clinic-level performance. Future research should test whether hybrid incentives that mix group and individual incentives can maintain some of the best elements of each design while mitigating the negative impacts.