Disability and walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: association with sensorimotor function, balance, and functional performance

STUDY DESIGN: One-group, prospective, cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To determine how sensorimotor function, balance, and physical performance are associated with disability and walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. BACKGROUND: Disability and limited walking capacity are often reported by patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Identification of associated factors could provide information for future investigations leading to better prevention and intervention strategies. METHODS AND MEASURES: Fifty patients with lumbar spinal stenosis answered questions regarding symptom intensity, disability, and walking capacity. Muscle strength and vibration sense were assessed to represent sensorimotor function. Balance ability was measured by single-leg stance time and basic physical performance was tested by the up-and-go (UG) test. Regression analyses, entering demographics and symptom intensity as control variables, and sensory, strength, balance, and physical performance as additional independent variables, were conducted separately for disability and walking capacity. RESULTS: Symptom intensity, vibration sense at the big toe, and UG test time were significantly correlated with disability. The final regression model showed that the control variables explained 20% of the variance, while vibration sense and UG test time explained an additional 20% of the variance. Walking capacity was significantly correlated with vibration sense at the big toe and UG test time. No significant regression model emerged for walking capacity. CONCLUSIONS: A moderate amount of variance in disability could be explained by sensory function at the big toe and physical performance. These factors should be considered in future research.     

Effect of a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt versus a lumbar support on walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can impair blood flow to the spinal nerves giving rise to neurogenic claudication and limited walking ability. Reducing lumbar lordosis can increases the volume of the spinal canal and reduce neuroischemia. We developed a prototype LSS belt aimed at reducing lumbar lordosis while walking.

Long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after laminectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective study to observe the correlation between postoperation findings shown on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical observations of 56 patients 10 years after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between postoperation findings on magnetic resonance imaging and surgical outcome in patients surgically treated for lumbar spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis is based on the compression seen in radiologic imaging of neurovascular structures in the vertebral canal, but the success of surgical decompression and its correlation with clinical observations very seldom have been monitored by postoperation radiologic imaging. METHODS: In this study, 56 patients surgically treated for lumbar spinal stenosis were re-examined clinically by use of the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Their walking capacity was evaluated by the treadmill test. Severity of pain before and after the treadmill test was investigated using a visual analog scale. Patients' perception of improvement measured as the change in their condition during the preceding 5 years was elicited by a questionnaire. On the basis of the stenotic findings on magnetic resonance imaging, the patients were classified into no stenosis (NoSten, n = 15) and stenosis (Sten, n = 41) groups, and a summative degenerative scale also was constructed with the findings categorized as follows: disc degeneration, disc herniation, facet joint arthrosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. RESULTS: Whereas the patients' perception of improvement correlated very strongly with the Oswestry score and walking capacity, there was no statistical difference between the NoSten and Sten groups in the Oswestry score, walking capacity, perception of improvement, or severity of pain. The effect of the summative degenerative scale on the patients' walking capacity was 13 times greater than the effect of the minimum area of the dural sac. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perception of improvement had a much stronger correlation with long-term surgical outcome than structural findings seen on postoperation magnetic resonance imaging. Moreover, degenerative findings had a greater effect on patients' walking capacity than stenotic findings.     

A new surgical treatment for lumbar spinal canal stenosis

Using the method of Assessment of Treatment for Low Back Pain by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 159 cases of lumbar spinal canal stenosis treated between 1977 and 1988 were analyzed. Although walking ability was satisfactorily improved, low back pain, numbness, sensory disturbance, motor disturbance, and ability to lift heavy objects showed relatively poor improvement. Lumbar complaints remained in some of the cases radiographically evaluated as having worsened lumbar lordosis or an unbalanced range of motion. The improvement ratio was 82.6% on average, but it was 74.3% among cases that underwent wide laminectomy (non-fusion) due mainly to such nonspecific complaints as a feeling of heaviness in the lumbar region. The ratio increased to 88.5% after the introduction of wide fenestration with spinous process flap for conservation of the posterior component. Since this technique provides a wide operative field at a low risk for the occurrence of postoperative instability, it is strongly recommended for the treatment of degenerative multiple spinal canal stenosis.     

Thoracic spinal canal stenosis

Hypertrophy of the posterior spinal elements leading to compromise of the spinal canal and its neural elements is a well-recognized pathological entity affecting the lumbar or cervical spine. Such stenosis of the thoracic spine in the absence of a generalized rheumatological, metabolic, or orthopedic disorder, or a history of trauma is generally considered to be rare. Over a 2-year period the authors have treated six cases of thoracic myelopathy associated with thoracic canal stenosis. In four patients the deficits developed gradually and painlessly. The three older patients had a clinical profile characterized by complaints of pseudoclaudication, spastic lower limbs, and evidence of posterior column dysfunction. Two patients were younger adults with low thoracic myelopathy associated with local back pain after minor trauma. Both patients also had congenital narrowing of the thoracic spinal canal. Oil and metrizamide contrast myelography in the prone position were of limited value in diagnosing this condition; in fact, myelography may be misleading and result in erroneous diagnosis of thoracic disc protrusion, when the principal problem is dorsal and lateral compression from hypertrophied facets. Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography sector scanning were more useful in the diagnosis of this disorder than was myelography. Thoracic canal stenosis may be more common than is currently recognized and account for a portion of the failures in anterior and lateral decompression of thoracic disc herniations.     

The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a frequent indication for spinal surgery. The predictive quality of treadmill testing and MRI for diagnostic verification is not yet clearly defined. Aim of the current study was to assess correlations between treadmill testing and MRI findings in the lumbar spine. Twenty-five patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were prospectively examined. Treadmill tests were performed and the area of the dural sac and neuroforamina was examined with MRI for the narrowest spinal segment. VAS and ODI were used for clinical assessment. The median age of the patients was 67 years. In the narrowest spinal segment the median area of the dural sac was 91 mm². The median ODI was 66 per cent. The median walking distance in the treadmill test was 70 m. The distance reached in the treadmill test correlated with the area of the dural sac (Spearman’s ρ = 0.53) and ODI (ρ = −0.51), but not with the area of the neuroforamina and VAS. The distance reached in the treadmill test predicts the grade of stenosis in MRI but has a limited diagnostic importance for the level of clinical symptoms in lumbar spinal stenosis.     

40例多节段腰椎管狭窄症步行负荷试验及影像检查结果与手术疗效相关分析

[目的]探讨运用步行负荷试验检查对多节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症"责任节段"定位的价值.[方法]选择2008年1月一2009年10月收治的40例影像学表现为多节段退变件腰椎管狭窄症患者,运用步行负荷试验结合影像学检查,进行"责任节段"定位判断诊断,以便确定临床症状产生的责任区域,并与影像学检查对比分析.同时根据上述方法对确定的"责仟节段"运用"选择性椎板减压加神经根管扩大术"治疗;疗效则采用日本矫形外科协会JOA评分标准评定.[结果]加例患者步行后较静息时的临床体征均有不I司程度的加重或引发新的临床体征.步行后和静息时腰痛、下肢感觉障碍及下肢麻木、放射痛比较有显著性差异(P<0.01).MRI及CT检查显示受累168条神经根,经步行负荷试验定位诊断并经手术证实,实际累及110条神经根(X<'2>值=8.173),影像学检查与步行负荷试验检查阳性神经根的构成分布相同,狭窄节段以L<,4、5>为主,其次为;L<,5>S<,1>及L<,3、4>节段,而L<,1、2>及L<,2、3>,节段虽影像学有狭窄,但少见有临床症状及体征(但也可能与样本量过少有关).本组40例患者均针对"责任节段"行椎板减压及神经根管扩大手术,其结果显示:术前评分(7.02±0.42)分;术后评分(13.12±0.34)分;末次随访评分(12.96±0.65)分;术后与术前评分比较P=0.0000,提示有非常显著性差异.术后与术后最终随访时评分比较P=0.121 5,提示无显著性差异.[结论]对于多节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症,运用步行负荷试验结合影像检查,进行临床功能定位检查,可在术前明确本病的"责任节段",便于医牛选择手术减压的范围及部位,减少或避免了医源性腰椎不稳的发生.对仅有影像学狭窄征象而无临床症状的间隙无需进行"预防性手术".     

Intermittent parasympathetic symptoms in lumbar spinal stenosis

Symptoms related to autonomic nervous dysfunction are uncommon in spinal stenosis. Involvement of nerve roots S2-S5 has previously been reported only in a few cases. Of great interest is the occurrence of phenomena such as intermittent penile erections and fecal incontinence on walking in patients with compromise of the lower lumbar spinal canal. We report on two patients, one of whom presented because of fecal incontinence and the other with penile erections on walking. In both cases, these manifestations resolved after decompressive laminectomy. These patients are compared to six other patients, with parasympathetic disturbances due to lumbar spinal stenosis, described previously.     

Operative treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis

The authors have made a retrospective study of a cohort of patients who underwent surgery for spinal stenosis. A total of 85 patients were surgically treated for spinal stenosis between 1993 and 1997, and 79 patients were available for re-evaluation. The average time of follow-up was 79 months. Twenty patients with monosegmental stenosis underwent fenestration and undercutting, 16 patients had a hemilaminectomy or laminectomy and 43 patients had an instrumented fusion after decompression. The severity of the clinical complaints, the degree of stenosis and the extent of the instability determined the method of operation used. Results were more variable when extensive decompression (hemilaminectomy or more) was needed and segmental stability was reduced by resection of large portions of the facet joints. Instability clearly worsened the results. The overall results clearly show that limited decompression is an ideal operative method, provided the indication is correct. Fusion cannot be avoided if segmental instability is present. This retrospective study shows that satisfactory long-term results can be achieved in lumbar spinal stenosis with surgery adapted to the degree of instability and the degree of stenosis.     

Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. OBJECTIVES: To identify outcome predictors of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is the most frequent indication for spine surgery in the elderly. More than 25% of surgical patients have a poor outcome, yet little is known about factors that predict the outcome of surgery. METHODS: Surgery was performed on 199 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, and they were observed for 2 years after surgery in four referral centers. Surgery consisted of decompressive laminectomy with or without arthrodesis. Outcomes included validated measures of symptom severity, walking capacity, and satisfaction with the results of surgery. Potential predictors of outcome included sociodemographic factors and physical examination, as well as radiographic, psychological, social, and clinical history variables. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with severe pain decreased from 81% before surgery to 31% by 2 years afterward. The most powerful preoperation predictor of greater walking capacity, milder symptoms, and greater satisfaction was the patient's report of good or excellent health before surgery. Low cardiovascular comorbidity also predicted a favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Patient's assessments of their own health and comorbidity are the most cogent outcome predictors of surgery for spinal stenosis.     

Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability

The aim of the study was to investigate the stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers (IS) in combination with interlaminar decompression in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability with lumbar spinal stenosis and to compare its clinical effect to patients with lumbar spinal stenosis in stable segments treated by interlaminar decompression only. Fifty consecutive patients with a minimum age of 60 years were scheduled for interlaminar decompression for clinically and radiologically confirmed lumbar spinal stenosis. Twenty-two of these patients (group DS) with concomitant degenerative low-grade lumbar instability up to 5 mm translational slip were treated by interlaminar decompression and additional dynamic IS implantation. The control group (D) with lumbar spinal stenosis in stable segments included 28 patients and underwent only interlaminar decompression. The mean follow-up was 46 months in group D and 44 months in group DS. A visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and walking distance were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. The segmental instability was evaluated in flexion-extension X-rays. The implantation of an IS significantly reduced the lumbar instability on flexion-extension X-rays. At the time of follow-up walking distance, VAS and ODI showed a significant improvement in both groups, but no statistical significance between groups D and DS. Four patients each in groups D and DS had revision surgery during the period of evaluation. The stabilising effect of dynamic IS in combination with interlaminar decompression offers an opportunity for an effective treatment for degenerative low-grade lumbar instability with lumbar spinal stenosis.     

Prospective functional evaluation of the surgical treatment of neurogenic claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

A prospective evaluation of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing operative treatment was performed using treadmill-bicycle functional testing as well as Oswestry and Visual Analog Pain scales for self-assessment. Thirty-two patients undergoing spinal stenosis decompression with and without a concomitant spinal fusion were prospectively evaluated, preoperatively and a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Surgical treatment was demonstrated to produce significant improvement in walking ability, and to a lesser degree, in the ability to bicycle 2 years postoperatively. Improvement in patient function demonstrated on the Oswestry questionnaire correlated with decreased pain observed on the Visual Analog Pain scale. The treadmill-bicycle test appears to be a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of neurogenic claudication and may be used as an objective test of postoperative outcome.     

The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, clinical study to evaluate surgical decompression of the stenotic area monitored by computed tomographic scan and its relation to clinical variables in patients operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis the influence of the degree of compressive relief on the patients' clinical outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The goal of surgical treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis is to decompress the stenotic area. Although the decompression should be adequate, there are no clear guidelines to determine the extent of necessary decompression. In fact, there is clinical evidence that there is a discrepancy between the surgical outcome in the patient with lumbar spinal stenosis and postoperative radiologic findings. METHODS: In 92 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had had no prior back surgery, preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scans were obtained to determine the degree of decompression. The postoperative scan findings were classified according to the degree of decompression into a no-stenosis group (n = 35), an adjacent-stenosis group (n = 27), and a residual-stenosis group (n = 30). The postoperative instability of the lumbar spine was investigated by functional radiography. The subjective disability of the patients was assessed using the Oswestry score and the severity of pain using the visual analog scale. Walking capacity was evaluated by a treadmill test. The patients' estimations of the results of surgery were classified into groups of satisfied patients and dissatisfied patients. RESULTS: The mean Oswestry score in all 92 patients was 27.1, and mean walking capacity was 630 m. In the satisfied patients, the Oswestry score was 18.8 and in the dissatisfied patients, 34.9 (P < 0.0000). Walking capacity was 690 m and 594 m, respectively. There were 30 patients with postoperative spinal instability, but it had no influence on surgical outcome. There were no differences in the Oswestry score, walking capacity, and patients' satisfaction among the postoperative CT groups. In the linear regression analysis, the satisfied patient corresponded significantly with the Oswestry score. CONCLUSIONS: The satisfaction of the patients with the results of surgery was more important in surgical outcome than the degree of decompression detected on computed tomographic scan.     

Proinflammatory cytokines in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with lumbar radiculopathy

In pathologic radicular pain of lumbar spinal stenosis, cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukins (ILs) play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of nerve degeneration and pain. We investigated TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with radicular pain caused by lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). A total of 30 LSS patients and 10 age-matched controls were examined. CSF samples were obtained adjacent to the level of stenosis in 30 LSS patients, and at the L4–L5 level in the 10 control patients. TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the samples were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). We compared the amounts of TNF-α and IL-6 with severity of pain (low back and leg pain), walking ability, and severity of stenosis (cross-sectional area of dural space). The concentration of IL-6 was significantly higher in LSS patients than in controls, but TNF-α levels were beneath the limit of detection. There was no correlation between IL-6 levels and severity of pain or walking ability (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant correlation between IL-6 levels and severity of stenosis (p < 0.05). The current study showed that the increased CSF IL-6 levels in LSS patients with radicular pain were not correlated with pain severity; although not proven in this study, the increase in CSF IL-6 concentration could indicate pathological nerve damage or degeneration of lumbar radiculopathy represented by the severity of stenosis.     

Computed tomography findings 4 years after surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. No correlation with clinical outcome

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, cross-sectional study of the correlation between postoperative computed tomography findings and patients' clinical outcomes approximately 4 years after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical and radiologic characteristics and their relation to each other. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The goal of surgical management for lumbar spinal stenosis is to decompress the stenotic area determined in radiologic examinations to relieve pressure on the neurovascular structures. However, the success of this decompression very rarely has been confirmed by postoperative radiologic imaging or compared with clinical outcome. METHODS: Postoperative computed tomography was performed on 191 patients. The findings were classified as "no stenosis," "central stenosis," "lateral stenosis," or "central-lateral stenosis." Postoperative instability of the lumbar spine was investigated by functional radiography. Clinical status was assessed by clinical examination. Subjective disability was assessing using the Oswestry questionnaire, and severity of pain using the visual analog scale. Walking capacity was evaluated by the tread-mill test. RESULTS: Radiologic studies revealed postoperative stenosis in 123 patients (64%). Small differences between the computed tomography groups were shown for the Oswestry score, but not for walking distance. Clinical signs, severity of pain, and radiologic instability were very similar for all computed tomography groups. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative radiologic stenosis was very common in patients operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis, but this did not correlate with clinical outcome. The clinician must be cautious when reconciling clinical symptoms and signs with postoperative computed tomography findings in patients operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis.     

The effects of OP-1206 alpha-CD on walking dysfunction in the rat neuropathic intermittent claudication model

IV prostaglandin E1 improves clinical symptoms in patients with spinal canal stenosis. In the present study, we assessed the effects of OP-1206 alpha-CD, an orally active prostaglandin E1 analog, on walking dysfunction in the rat neuropathic intermittent claudication model. To induce spinal stenosis, two pieces of silicon rubber were placed in the lumbar (L4-6) epidural space in rats. Postsurgical walking function was measured using a treadmill apparatus. Spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) and skin blood flow (SKBF) were measured using a laser-Doppler flowmeter. OP-1206 alpha-CD was administered orally bid for 11 days from postoperative Day 3. In Control nontreated rats, a significant walking dysfunction was observed from Day 1 after the induction of spinal stenosis and persisted for 14 days when compared with the Sham-Operated group. On postoperative Day 15, SCBF revealed a significant reduction in the territory of spinal stenosis, although SKBF was not affected. OP-1206 alpha-CD significantly improved walking dysfunction on postoperative Days 5 (300 microg/kg), 7 (150 and 300 microg/kg), and 14 (150 and 300 microg/kg) when compared with the Vehicle-Treated group. On postoperative Day 15, the decrease in SCBF was significantly (150 and 300 microg/kg) improved by OP-1206 alpha-CD treatment, albeit SKBF remained unaffected. These data show that oral treatment with OP-1206 alpha-CD is effective in improving walking dysfunction induced by spinal canal stenosis, and this therapeutic effect is likely mediated by improved SCBF at the territory of spinal stenosis. IMPLICATIONS:Intermittent motor dysfunction is a clinical symptom associated with partial spinal compression. The present study provides evidence that oral treatment with the prostaglandin E1 analog (OP-1206 alpha-CD) is effective in improving motor dysfunction and spinal cord blood flow in rats with spinal compression.     

Validation study of a clinical diagnosis support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis

Background

A clinical diagnosis support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis was developed by the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. However, the use of this tool has not yet been validated.

Methods

Patients with symptoms in the lower extremities and who visited the Department of Orthopedics initially were recruited to the study. Orthopedic physicians who were not spine specialists completed the support tools. Spine specialists examined the patients, made a diagnosis, and completed the lumbar spine examination sheet made for the study. The support tool and lumbar spine examination sheet were sent to a central panel comprising four panelists who then decided on a final diagnosis.

Results

In total, 118 patients were evaluated, including 62 males and 56 females. Lumbar spinal stenosis was diagnosed in 58 and nonlumbar spinal stenosis in 60 patients. The mean score in the lumbar spinal stenosis group was 12.2 points (median 13 points). In the nonlumbar spinal stenosis group, the mean score was 7.5 points (median 7 points). Sensitivity was 0.948, and specificity was 0.40.

Conclusions

Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with a very low score were diagnosed with mild lumbar spinal stenosis, whereas nonlumbar spinal stenosis patients with a very high score were diagnosed as suffering from spine disease and needing special treatment by spine surgeons. Our results validate the use of the support tool for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Although the specificity observed in the present study was lower than that reported at development, we conclude that this support tool is useful for screening patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.     

Randomised placebo-controlled trial on the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

This is a double blind randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The trial compared the outcome of salmon calcitonin nasal spray to placebo nasal spray in patients with MRI confirmed lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the commonest conditions encountered by spine surgeons. It more frequently affects elderly patients and lumbar decompression has been used to treat the condition with variable success. Non operative measures have been investigated, but their success ranges from 15% to 43% in patients followed up for 1–5 years (Simotas in Clin Orthop 1(384):153–161, 2001). Salmon calcitonin injections have been investigated in previous trials and may have a treatment effect. Nasal salmon calcitonin has become available and if effective would have advantages over injections. Forty patients with symptoms of neurogenic claudication and MRI proven lumbar spinal stenosis were randomly assigned either nasal salmon calcitonin or placebo nasal spray to use for 4 weeks. This was followed by a ‘washout’ period of 6 weeks, and subsequent treatment with 6 weeks of nasal salmon calcitonin. Standard spine outcome measures including Oswestry disability index (ODI), low back outcome score, visual analogue score and shuttle walking test were administered at baseline, 4, 10 and 16 weeks. Twenty patients received nasal salmon calcitonin and twenty patients received placebo nasal spray. At 4 weeks post treatment there was no statistically significant difference in the outcome measures between the two groups. The change in ODI was a mean 1.3 points for the calcitonin group and 0.6 points for the placebo group (P = 0.51), the mean change in visual analogue score for leg pain was 10 mm in the calcitonin group and 0 mm in the placebo group (P = 0.51). There was no significant difference in walking distance between the two groups, with a mean improvement in walking distance of 21 m in the calcitonin group and 8 m in the placebo group (P = 0.78). At the end of the trial the ODI had improved by a mean of 3.7 points in the calcitonin group and 3.8 points in the placebo group (P = 0.44). This randomised placebo controlled trial has not shown any treatment effect in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with nasal salmon calcitonin.     

Lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis: A case report and review of the literature

IntroductionLumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is a rare condition defined by an excessive deposition of adipose tissue in the lumbar spinal canal. The objective of this case report is to document a clinical case of SEL presenting within a multidisciplinary spine clinic and to compare our clinical findings and management with the available literature.Case presentationA 51-year-old female presented at a spine clinic with low back pain, bilateral leg pain and difficulty walking. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine showed evidence of severe central canal stenosis due to extensive epidural lipomatosis. She was initially advised to lose weight and undergo a 3-month course of physiotherapy. However, because of lack of improvement, she was scheduled for and underwent L4-S1 posterior spinal decompression and L4-L5 posterior spinal instrumented fusion. At 12-month follow-up, the patient reported no pain and retained the ability to walk regular distances without experiencing discomfort.DiscussionThis case report describes the conservative and surgical management of a case of lumbar spinal stenosis due to SEL. The therapeutic approach of patients with this condition is not standardized. As such, a discussion of the literature with respect to the diagnosis, clinical presentation, epidemiology, imaging appearance, risk factors, etiology, and management of SEL is also presented.     

DIAPASON系统治疗腰椎管狭窄症的近期疗效

目的探讨用DIAPASON系统治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄的近期治疗效果。方法应用椎板减压、神经根松解、椎间植骨融合、DIAPASON系统固定治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄患者20例。手术节段:L4~5节段10例,L5~S1节段6例,L4~5合并L5~S1者4例。结果20例手术全部成功,术后无感染及内固定失败等并发症,随访6~18个月,8例患者腰腿痛消失,11例症状改善,1例无变化。17例行走功能改善。3例有泌尿功能障碍的患者中2例症状改善,1例无改变。结论后路行椎管减压、神经根松解、应用DIAPASON系统内固定、椎间植骨融合治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症近期疗效满意。