Pharmacokinetics of recombinant factor IX in relation to age of the patient: implications for dosing in prophylaxis

The aims of this study were to investigate possible age-related changes in the disposition of factor IX procoagulant activity (FIX:C) after administration of recombinant factor IX (rFIX) and to translate the pharmacokinetic findings into suggestions for dosing of rFIX during prophylactic treatment of haemophilia B. Pharmacokinetic data were available from a previous study on 56 patients, aged 4-56 years (one of whom was excluded from analysis). FIX:C curves during prophylactic dosing were computer-simulated from the single-dose data. Clearance and volume of distribution at steady state of FIX:C increased linearly with body weight of the patients, consequently increasing during childhood and adolescence but remaining fairly constant during adulthood. The terminal half-life of FIX:C showed no correlation with age, while in vivo recovery (in U dL(-1) per U kg(-1) given) tended to increase. Computer-predicted trough levels of exogenous FIX:C during repeated doses of rFIX (50 U kg(-1)) and, conversely, doses (in U kg(-1)) needed to maintain a 1-U dL(-1) trough level showed little or no dependence on age. There was considerable interindividual variation in disposition and required doses of rFIX, emphasizing the need for individual dose titration. Dosing of rFIX according to lean body mass instead of body weight did not reduce this variability. During prophylaxis a 1-U dL(-1) trough level can normally be maintained by dosing every 2-3 days, the former schedule resulting in, on average, a 45% lower consumption of rFIX.     

Population pharmacokinetics of recombinant factor IX: implications for dose tailoring

The principles of pharmacokinetic (PK) dose tailoring in clinical practice, using limited blood sampling and Bayesian PK analysis, have been described for factor VIII (FVIII). This study applied the same procedure to recombinant FIX (rFIX), i.e. population PK modelling and the use of a simplified (one‐compartment) model to describe only the terminal part of the coagulation factor vs. time curve. Data from a previous study on rFIX in 56 patients (4–56 years, 18–133 kg) were used to define a three‐compartment population PK model. The average FIX clearance was 8.4 mL h^?1 kg^?1. Elimination half‐life ranged between 14 and 27 h. Data obtained from 24 h after the infusion were found to define the terminal phase of FIX disposition. Doses to produce a target trough FIX level (set at 0.01 IU mL^?1) at 72 h predicted by the Bayesian analysis, with blood sampling at either 24, 48 and 72 h or at only 24 and 48 h, were within ?40% to +67% of those predicted using the three‐compartment model, and within ?57% to +125% for targeting a level at 96 h. These errors were lower than the overall interindividual variance in dose requirements. As three‐compartment models are needed to characterize the PK of both plasma‐derived FIX and rFIX, simplification to a one‐compartment model is less straightforward than for FVIII, and the methodology should be investigated further before clinical application. Limited blood sampling and Bayesian analysis could still, however, be potentially useful for targeting rFIX trough levels during prophylaxis.     

A commentary on the differences in pharmacokinetics between recombinant and plasma‐derived factor IX and their implications for dosing

Summary. This commentary aims to summarize all aspects of the difference in pharmacokinetics (PK) between recombinant factor IX (rFIX) and plasma‐derived factor IX (pdFIX) and their implications for dosing. PK data were compiled from 17 published studies. The average clearance (CL) of rFIX normally ranged between 7.5 and 9.1 mL h^?1 kg^?1, whereas that of pdFIX was 3.8–5.4 mL h^?1 kg^?1. The average terminal half‐life was 18–24 h among all 72‐h studies on rFIX, in contrast to (normally) 29–43 h for pdFIX. In vivo recovery was more variable. Judging from the pooled data, the typical recovery of rFIX is around two‐third that of pdFIX. The difference in PK between rFIX and pdFIX is thus clear‐cut and has implications for dosing. As estimated from the compiled data, the dose required to reach any peak level of FIX immediately after administration would be 1.5 times higher for rFIX than for pdFIX, most probably with considerable individual variation. Calculated doses for a patient on a twice weekly prophylactic treatment to achieve a predetermined trough FIX level depended markedly on CL and were about twice as high with rFIX as with pdFIX. In summary, conversion factors between rFIX and pdFIX of 1.5 for single doses and 2 for prophylactic dosing can tentatively be applied; however, the interindividual variance both in recovery and CL of rFIX and pdFIX and the unknown variance in ratios between these PK parameters call for careful monitoring if a switch of treatment is made.     

Prophylactic dosing of factor VIII and factor IX from a clinical pharmacokinetic perspective

Summary.  The high cost and limited availability of factor concentrates make dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) a crucial issue in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. It has often been recommended that this treatment should aim to maintain a minimum plasma level of 1% of normal coagulation factor activity (FVIII:C or FIX:C). The dosage needed is commonly given as 25–40 U kg⁻¹ three times weekly for FVIII or twice weekly for FIX. However, these guidelines are valid only with several qualifications. First, the actual trough levels required may vary considerably between patients. The clinical severity of haemophilia may depend on more factors than the endogenous level of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Secondly, interindividual variations in dose requirements are also due to variance in the pharmacokinetics of the coagulation factors. Pharmacokinetic calculations are useful to design optimal dosing schedules to achieve required trough levels of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Moreover, tailoring of the dosing of FVIII or FIX according to their disposition in the individual patient can markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic treatment. However, the usefulness of in vivo recovery as a guide for prophylactic dosing seems questionable. It should be clearly understood that maintaining a certain trough level of FVIII:C or FIX:C is not an end in itself. Clinical outcome, not the achieved trough level, determines whether a dosage is adequate. Chiefly for economic reasons, the minimum effective dosage of coagulation factor should be determined and used in every patient. The dose requirement should also be re-evaluated at appropriate times.     

Switching to recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein prophylaxis results in fewer infusions,decreased factor IX consumption and lower bleeding rates

In the phase 3 B‐LONG [Recombinant Factor IX Fc Fusion Protein (rFIXFc) in Subjects with Haemophilia B] study, rFIXFc dosed every 1–2 weeks was safe and efficacious in previously treated subjects with haemophilia B. To date, there are no evaluations of transitioning from conventional to long‐acting factor IX (FIX) prophylaxis. This post‐hoc analysis of B‐LONG subjects compared prophylaxis with other FIX products and rFIXFc. Pre‐ and on‐study data were analysed to assess dosing regimen, weekly FIX consumption and annualized bleeding rates (ABRs). Population pharmacokinetics models were used to generate FIX activity profiles with rFIXFc and recombinant FIX prophylaxis. Thirty‐nine subjects, previously treated prophylactically, were evaluated. Prior to study, most subjects (69·2%) received twice‐weekly FIX infusions; on study, subjects infused rFIXFc once every 1–2 weeks with c. 30–50% reductions in weekly consumption. On‐study estimated mean ABRs were lower than pre‐study estimated mean ABRs. Models predicted that rFIXFc administered 50 iu/kg weekly and 100 iu/kg every 10 d would maintain steady‐state FIX trough levels ≥1 iu/dl in 95·4% and 89·2% of subjects, respectively. These results indicate that patients receiving rFIXFc prophylaxis can markedly reduce infusion frequency and FIX consumption, have a greater likelihood of maintaining FIX activity >1 iu/dl and experience fewer bleeding episodes compared with prior FIX prophylaxis.     

Prophylaxis in factor IX deficiency product and patient variation

To determine the dosing needed to maintain a prophylactic level of factor IX (FIX) >/=2%, 15 non-inhibitor severe (/=2%. Based on pharmacokinetic analysis the median amount of concentrate needed to maintain a prophylactic level >/=2% for 30 days when administered every third day is 677 IU kg(-1) pd-FIX (range 388-6005 IU kg(-1) pd-FIX) compared with 1168 IU kg(-1) r-FIX (range 268-13085 IU kg(-1) r-FIX). The median cost for 30 days of prophylaxis of an average 25-kg 8-year-old child at the current University of Iowa Price (0.87 US dollars Mononine/0.86 US dollars BeneFix as of December 2002) if given every third day would be 19,972 US dollars and 34,456 US dollars for r-FIX. However, because of wide inter-patient variability in recovery and half-life, pharmacokinetic evaluation of each patient is necessary to determine the appropriate dosing schedule and product best suited for prophylaxis.     

Multicentre,randomized, open‐label study of on‐demand treatment with two prophylaxis regimens of recombinant coagulation factor IX in haemophilia B subjects

Few randomized studies have reported on the use of factor IX (FIX) for secondary prophylaxis in haemophilia B patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two secondary prophylaxis regimens of recombinant coagulation FIX, nonacog alfa, compared with on‐demand therapy. Male subjects aged 6–65 years with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2, n = 50) and ≥12 bleeding episodes (including ≥6 haemarthroses episodes) within 12 months of study participation were enrolled in this multicentre, randomized, open‐label, four‐period crossover trial. The primary measure was the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of two prophylactic regimens vs. on‐demand therapy. In the intent‐to‐treat group, mean ABR values were 35.1, 2.6 and 4.6 for the first on‐demand period, the 50 IU kg^?1 twice‐weekly period, and the 100 IU kg^?1 once‐weekly period respectively. Differences in ABR between the first on‐demand period and both prophylaxis regimens were significant (P < 0.0001); no significant differences were observed between prophylaxis regimens (P = 0.22). Seven serious adverse events occurred in five subjects, none related to study drug. Results demonstrated that secondary prophylaxis therapy with nonacog alfa 50 IU kg^?1 twice weekly or 100 IU kg^?1 once weekly reduced ABR by 89.4% relative to on‐demand treatment. Both prophylaxis regimens demonstrated favourable safety profiles in subjects with haemophilia B.     

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of factor IX evaluated by model-independent methods

We studied the pharmacokinetic data of 13 subjects with hemophilia B treated with a single-dose of a Factor IX concentrate (Bebulin TIM2, N = 9; Preconativ, N = 4). The decay curves of Factor IX were evaluated by model-independent methods and the following pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) were estimated: clearance (ml/h/kg) = 4.99 +/- 2.01; mean residence time (h) = 22.9 +/- 10.6; volume of distribution (ml/kg) = 99.9 +/- 35.5. The in vivo recovery (59.8% +/- 16.9%) was found to be inversely correlated with the volume of distribution. No significant difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters was found between patients treated with Preconativ and those treated with Bebulin. A model-dependent compartmental evaluation of the 13 decay curves showed that the two-compartment model was better than the one-compartment model in 7 cases (53.8%), but the improvement of fit resulting from the two-compartment model was statistically significant in only 2 cases (15.4%).     

Improved cost-effectiveness by pharmacokinetic dosing of factor VIII in prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A

The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of optimizing prophylactic dosing of factor VIII by the use of individual pharmacokinetic data. Twenty-one patients were enrolled in a randomized cross-over study on standard dosage regimens vs. dosing according to pharmacokinetic principles. The study period was 2×6 months. Using single-dose pharmacokinetic data for each patient, plasma factor VIII procoagulant activity (FVIII:C) curves following various doses and intervals were computer-simulated. From these calculations, a suitable dosage was chosen. FVIII:C was also repeatedly measured during study periods. Trough levels of FVIII:C, numbers of spontaneous joint bleedings and amounts of factor concentrate used during the two study periods were compared for each patient.
There was a close correlation between predicted and measured values of FVIII:C. As the half-lives of FVIII:C in the patients varied from 7.8 to 18.3 h, it was obviously beneficial to base the dosage on individual pharmacokinetic data. Fourteen patients completed both study periods. Mean trough level of exogenous FVIII:C was raised from 0.89 (SD 0.73) U dL⁻¹ during standard dosage to 2.2 (1.5) U dL⁻¹ during pharmacokinetic dosage. Concomitantly, mean 6-month consumption of factor VIII was decreased from 124 000 (SD 30 000) units to 84 000 (31 000) units. Numbers of reported bleedings were generally similar during both periods.
The study demonstrates the usefulness of individual pharmacokinetics as a tool for cost-effective utilization of factor VIII in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A.     

Patterns of tertiary prophylaxis in Canadian adults with severe and moderately severe haemophilia B

From a young age patients with severe and moderately severe FIX deficiency (haemophilia B) can experience spontaneous or traumatic bleeding and joint destruction may result. The use of coagulation factor IX concentrate to prevent anticipated bleeding, as primary or secondary prophylaxis, has become a common and recommended practice in children. The current practice of using tertiary prophylaxis, in the presence of established joint arthropathy, in adults with haemophilia B is not well characterized. This observational study was conducted to gain a better understanding of the recent Canadian experience with tertiary prophylaxis in adults with severe and moderately severe haemophilia B. Data were collected from all eligible adult (≥ 18 years of age) males with baseline FIX:C ≤ 2% from seven Canadian Hemophilia Treatment centres over a 2‐year observation period from 2009 to 2011. Thirty‐four per cent of the 67 subjects with moderately severe haemophilia B were exposed to prophylaxis with the majority as continuous prophylaxis (≥45 weeks year^‐1). The severe subgroup (FIX:C < 1%) demonstrated a 52% exposure rate. None had primary prophylaxis exposure in childhood. Eighty‐one per cent used once or twice weekly infusion regimens and reported a median annual bleeding rate of five bleeds per year versus four bleeds per year for those using on‐demand treatment. Annual median factor utilization for all subjects using prophylaxis was 196 283 U year^‐1 compared to 46 361 U year^‐1 for on demand. Approximately 50% of adults with severe haemophilia B are using continuous tertiary prophylaxis in Canada, a practice likely to increase which warrants further study.     

Pharmacokinetics of factor VIII and factor IX

Summary.  A survey of principal pharmacokinetic (PK) studies on factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) plasma- and rDNA-derived concentrates, analysed by means of the PKRD program, has been performed. Notwithstanding the accurate definition of the study design, released in 1991 by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SSC-ISTH), a large variability of PK parameters has been pointed out. In the majority of the PK studies, the size of the population is small. In this situation, a careful individualization of haemophilia therapy is strongly recommended. The tailored prediction of loading and maintenance dosages and the need for strict control of trough FVIII/IX levels are mandatory not only to decrease the risk of bleeds but also to spare financial resources. Recently, the old problem of FVIII assay standardization has again become a concern among physicians, especially after the introduction of B-domain deleted rFVIII concentrate. The discrepancies between the widely used one-stage clotting assay and the chromogenic substrate assay seem to be solved by the introduction of a product-specific laboratory standard.     

Use of pharmacokinetics in the coagulation factor treatment of patients with haemophilia

Dosing decisions for replacement coagulation factors in patients with haemophilia should be made on an individual patient basis, with the required dose dependent on factors including the clinical situation, the severity of the factor deficiency, and the location and extent of bleeding. Moreover, there is considerable variability in the pharmacokinetics of coagulation products that needs to be considered; in particular, with both factor (F) IX and FVIII products, there is considerable inter-patient variability in in vivo recovery and terminal half-life values. In the present report, we provide a practical guide to calculating and applying pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to the optimal dosing of coagulation products. We discuss the conduct of a pharmacokinetic study in an individual patient, how to calculate pharmacokinetic values from raw data and clinical situations where an individual pharmacokinetic study is helpful. We highlight the importance of considering an individual pharmacokinetic study in all patients starting a new coagulation product.     

Daily dosing prophylaxis for haemophilia: a randomized crossover pilot study evaluating feasibility and efficacy

Regular replacement therapy (prophylaxis) for haemophilia has been shown to prevent development of disabling arthropathy and to provide a better quality of life compared to treatment on demand; however, at a substantially higher cost. Calculations based on pharmacokinetic principles have shown that shortening dose intervals may reduce cost. The aim of this prospective, randomized, crossover pilot study was to address whether daily dosing is feasible, if it reduces concentrate consumption and is as effective in preventing bleeding as the standard prophylactic dosing regimen. In a 12 + 12 month crossover study, 13 patients were randomized to start either their own previously prescribed standard dose, or daily dosing adjusted to maintain at least the same trough levels as obtained with the standard dose. Ten patients completed the study. A 30% reduction in cost of factor concentrates was achieved with daily prophylaxis. However, the number of bleeding events increased in some patients in the daily dosing arm and patients reported decreased quality of life during daily prophylaxis. Daily treatment had a greater impact on daily life, and the patients found it more stressful.Prophylaxis with daily dosing may be feasible and efficacious in some patients. A substantial reduction of factor consumption and costs can be realized, but larger studies are needed before the introduction of daily prophylaxis into clinical routine can be recommended.     

The pharmacokinetics of factor VIII and factor IX: methodology, pitfalls and applications

This article reviews the pharmacokinetics of exogenous factor VIII and factor IX in patients with haemophilia. It focuses on the methodology (and inherent pitfalls) of pharmacokinetic studies, then summarizes available pharmacokinetic data and finally discusses some applications of pharmacokinetics for optimization of prophylactic treatment of haemophilia and for comparison of coagulation factor concentrates.