Superiority of clomipramine over imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder: a placebo-controlled trial.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken to compare the effects of imipramine and clomipramine in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. The number of dropouts in the placebo-treated group was 7; in the imipramine-treated group, 4; and in the clomipramine treated group, 0. Ten subjects fulfilled the 12 weeks of treatment in the placebo group, 25 in the imipramine group, and 22 in the clomipramine group. To minimize dropouts because of side effects, a flexible dose regimen with a careful escalation of doses was applied. The maximal dose allowed was 250 mg/day. The mean (+/- SEM) daily doses reached were 124 +/- 9 mg (range, 50-250 mg) of imipramine and 109 +/- 8 mg (range, 25-200 mg) of clomipramine. At the end of the trial, the number of panic attacks as well as the anxiety between attacks (measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety) were markedly reduced in patients treated with either of the two antidepressant drugs, but only slightly decreased in patients on placebo. With respect to all major outcome parameters, i.e., full panic attacks, total number of anxiety attacks (full plus mild), and anxiety between attacks, the effect of clomipramine was clearly and significantly superior to that of imipramine (p less than 0.001, p less than 0.002, and p less than 0.002, respectively). Moderate intake of diazepam was allowed; in the clomipramine group (p less than 0.006), but neither in the imipramine group nor in the placebo group, a significant decrement in diazepam intake was observed during the course of the trial. The finding that clomipramine may have a higher potency and/or efficacy than imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder supports the concept that the antipanic effect of antidepressant drugs is due to the influence of these compounds on serotonergic rather than noradrenergic neurotransmission.     

Do antidepressants selectively suppress spontaneous (unexpected) panic attacks? A replication

The purpose of this study was to test the following interrelated hypotheses in a larger sample by attempting to replicate supportive results from a small therapeutic study: (1) the pathogenesis of panic disorder includes at least two identifiable components: a biological component represented by spontaneous (unexpected) panic attacks, and a cognitive component represented by situational attacks and especially by phobias; (2) these components respond differently to treatment; (3) many biological processes respond to an effective intervention in proportion to their deviance from "normal" prior to treatment ("Law of Initial Value"); and (4) the response of spontaneous panic attacks to an effective treatment conforms to that model. Previously, the authors reanalyzed an 8-week therapeutic study of panic disorder that included groups treated with placebo and with imipramine (225 mg daily). The criteria of response were spontaneous panic attacks (biological component), situational panic attacks (both components), and agoraphobia ratings (cognitive component). The analyses compared the regression lines for posttreatment status on pretreatment status in the imipramine and placebo groups. The effect of imipramine on spontaneous panic attacks fitted the hypothesized model: the pre-post slope in the placebo group was approximately 1 (45 degrees), whereas the slope in the imipramine group was approximately 0. There was no significant difference in pre-post slopes between the imipramine and placebo groups for situational panic attacks or agoraphobia ratings. For this report, the authors applied the same approach to another larger data set from a study using a similar design, but a different antidepressant. In this multicenter, double-blind study, patients with panic disorder were randomly assigned to receive 10 weeks of treatment with placebo (N = 78) or fluoxetine 10 mg (N = 84) or 20 mg (N = 81) daily. Spontaneous and situational panic attacks were registered in a daily diary, and agoraphobia was rated at each visit. Using baseline and endpoint data, fluoxetine had a statistically significant, dose-dependent, suppressive effect on spontaneous panic attacks, as measured by the pre-post slopes in the three treatment groups. The placebo group showed some response (slope = 0.69). There were no significant drug effects on situational panic attacks. On ratings of agoraphobia, the slopes in the placebo and the fluoxetine 20 mg groups did not differ, but the slope in the fluoxetine 10 mg group was significantly less than that in the placebo group, suggesting a therapeutic drug effect on agoraphobia only at the lower dose. These results are consistent with the stated hypotheses. They suggest that the therapeutic effects of antidepressants on panic disorder may be due primarily to the specific suppression of spontaneous panic attacks among patients with high baseline pathologic findings. Implications of these results for concepts of pathogenesis, clinical practice, and therapeutic research regarding panic disorder are discussed.     

The effect of doxapram on brain imaging in patients with panic disorder.

Administration of doxapram hydrochloride, a respiratory stimulant, is experienced by panic disorder patients to be similar to panic attacks but has reduced emotional effect in normal volunteers, thus providing a laboratory model of panic for functional imaging. Six panic patients and seven normal control subjects underwent positron emission tomography with (18)F-deoxyglucose imaging after a single-blinded administration of either doxapram or a placebo saline solution. Saline and doxapram were administered on separate days in counterbalanced order. Patients showed a greater heart rate increase on doxapram relative to saline than controls, indicating differential response. On the saline placebo day, patients had greater prefrontal relative activity than controls. In response to doxapram, patients tended to decrease prefrontal activity more than controls, and increased cingulate gyrus and amygdala activity more than controls. This suggests that panic disorder patients activate frontal inhibitory centers less than controls, a tendency that may lower the threshold for panic.     

Serotonin function in panic disorder: a double blind placebo controlled study with fluvoxamine and ritanserin

In order to evaluate serotonin (5-HT) function in panic disorder, a double blind placebo controlled study was conducted with ritanserin, a specific 5-HT₂ receptor antagonist, and fluvoxamine, a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, in 60 patients with panic disorder. Patients were treated for 8 weeks with 150 mg fluvoxamine, 20 mg ritanserin or placebo; these dose levels were reached after 1 week. In addition, as an index of 5-HT function in panic disorder, plasma concentration of -endorphin, cortisol and 5-hydroxyindolacetic-acid (5-HIAA) were measured. Furthermore, 5-HT uptake in blood platelets was assessed. Noradrenergic function was assessed by measuring plasma MHPG concentration. In addition, plasma melatonin concentration was measured. Treatment with fluvoxamine resulted in a profound reduction in the number of panic attacks, followed by a decrease in avoidance behavior. Treatment with ritanserin appeared to be ineffective. During treatment no significant changes were observed in plasma concentrations of -endorphin, cortisol, 5-HIAA and MHPG. With respect to 5-HT kinetics in blood platelets, a substantial increase in K_m was observed after treatment with fluvoxamine, whereas V_max decreased. After treatment with fluvoxamine, plasma concentration of melatonin was significantly increased, which suggests that melatonin synthesis is in part under serotonergic control. The findings of the present study do not support the hypothesis that 5-HT₂ receptors are supersensitive in patients suffering from panic disorder, but allow no conclusions about the involvement of other 5-HT receptor subtypes.     

Differences in pharmacodynamics but not pharmacokinetics between subjects with panic disorder and healthy subjects after treatment with a single dose of alprazolam

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the benzodiazepine alprazolam (1 mg, administered orally) were compared between eight patients with panic disorder and eight age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Subjects received orally administered placebo and alprazolam in a randomized, double-blind, single-dose crossover study. The elimination half-life, time of maximum plasma concentration, maximum concentration, volume of distribution, and clearance of alprazolam were similar for both groups. For each cohort, alprazolam treatment (vs. placebo) produced significant changes in typical benzodiazepine agonist effects, such as increased sedation and impaired cognitive performance on the digit-symbol substitution test. For the panic disorder group only, there was a significant increase in the subjective rating of"contented" and a reduction in the rating of "easily irritated." For the healthy volunteer group, alprazolam produced increases in ratings of "fatigued" and "slowed thinking," but also increases in ratings of "relaxed." In each group, alprazolam significantly increased the electroencephalographic (EEG) measure of relative beta amplitude (range, 13-30 Hz) compared with placebo. Concentration-EEG response curves fit a sigmoid E(max) model, and there was greater sensitivity to EEG effects, as measured by a 28% reduction in the EC50 value, in the panic disorder group compared with healthy control subjects. After alprazolam treatment, there was increased sensitivity to EEG and mood effects and fewer aversive effects in the panic disorder group compared with healthy subjects. There were no differences in the pharmacodynamic measures of sedation and cognition or differences in pharmacokinetics between the two groups.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of abecarnil and diazepam in the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder

In a multicenter, double-blind trial, 310 patients who had received a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder were treated for 6 weeks with either abecarnil, diazepam, or placebo at mean daily doses of 12 mg of abecarnil or 22 mg of diazepam administered three times daily. Patients who were improved at 6 weeks could volunteer to continue double-blind treatment for a total of 24 weeks. The maintenance treatment phase allowed the comparison of taper results for the three treatments at several study periods (0-6 weeks, 7-12 weeks, and more than 12 weeks). Slightly more diazepam (77%) and placebo (75%) patients completed the 6-week study than abecarnil patients (66%). At intake and baseline, after a 1-week placebo washout, the patient was required to have a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score of > or =20. Major adverse events for both abecarnil and diazepam were drowsiness, dizziness, fatigue, and coordination difficulties. Clinical improvement data showed that both abecarnil and diazepam produced statistically significantly more symptom relief than did placebo after 1 week of treatment. At 6 weeks treatment (using last observation carried forward analysis), however, only diazepam still differed significantly (p < 0.01) from placebo. High placebo response (56% moderate to marked global improvement) at 6 weeks, as well as a slightly lower nonsignificant improvement rate observed with abecarnil, a partial y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist, when compared with diazepam, a full GABA agonist, most likely contributed to our findings. Finally, taper results showed that only diazepam and not abecarnil caused the presence of temporary discontinuation symptoms, but only in patients who had been treated for at least 12 weeks.     

Pentagastrin has panic-inducing properties in obsessive compulsive disorder

The effects of the CCK_B-receptor agonist pentagastrin, a synthetic analogue of the cholecystokinin tetrapeptide (CCK-4), were studied in seven patients suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and seven healthy controls. All subjects were challenged with an IV dose of 0.6 µg/kg pentagastrin or placebo under double blind placebo controlled conditions, on two separate occasions, with a minimum interval of 1 week. Six (86%) out of seven OCD patients experienced a panic-like reaction after pentagastrin administration, against only two (29%) in the control group. These differences failed to reach statistical significance, probably due to the small sample size. No increases were observed in obsessions or compulsive behaviors as assessed with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Challenge Scale, neither in the pentagastrin, nor in the placebo condition. These findings suggest that pentagastrin has panic-inducing properties in OCD patients, without affecting the core symptoms. The panic-inducing properties of pentagastrin are not specific for panic disorder patients, which might be indicative of a common neurobiological dysfunction in panic disorder and OCD at the level of CCK-B receptors.     

Effects of alprazolam on cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide-induced panic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis activity: a placebo-controlled study.

Cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide (CCK-4) induces panic attacks both in patients with panic disorder (PD) and healthy volunteers. It has been shown that panic elicited by CCK-4 is improved after treatment with antidepressants. Moreover, a reduction of CCK-4-induced panic has also been demonstrated after treatment with lorazepam in single subjects and after selective GABAergic treatment with vigabatrin. Although benzodiazepines are widely used as anxiolytics, no controlled study on the effects of benzodiazepines on CCK-4-induced panic symptoms is available so far. Therefore, we investigated the effects of alprazolam and placebo on CCK-4-induced panic symptoms in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A total of 30 healthy subjects were challenged with 50 microg CCK-4. Out of these 30 subjects, 26 showed a marked panic response to CCK-4. Subjects were rechallenged after a 7-day interval and treated with 1 mg alprazolam or placebo 1 h prior to the second CCK-4 challenge. Panic was assessed using the acute panic inventory (API) and a DSM-IV-derived panic symptom scale (PSS). Moreover, the number of reported symptoms and self-rated anxiety and arousal were recorded. We found a significant reduction of the API and PSS scores and of the number of reported symptoms compared to placebo. Moreover, compared to placebo the CCK-4-induced ACTH and cortisol release were significantly attenuated during the CCK-4 challenge after alprazolam treatment. However, also placebo treatment reduced CCK-4-induced anxiety and HPA-axis activation to a certain extent. In conclusion, our data show that alprazolam reduces CCK-4-induced panic, which supports the hypothesis of a possible interaction between the GABA and the CCK system.     

The effect of 6-week treatment with escitalopram on CCK-4 challenge: A placebo-controlled study in CCK-4-sensitive healthy volunteers

Cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide (CCK-4)-induced panic attacks are reportedly attenuated by effective treatment with antipanic antidepressants in patients with panic disorder, but in healthy volunteers such effects are not well studied. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of 6-week treatment with an SSRI escitalopram on CCK-4-induced symptoms in healthy volunteers, who previously responded with a panic attack to CCK-4 challenge. A total of 18 healthy subjects (10 males and eight females, mean age 22.5±5.8) received a 6-week treatment with escitalopram (10 mg/day) and placebo followed by CCK-4 challenge (50 μg) in a double-blind crossover design. The panic rate was 67% after treatment with escitalopram and 56% after treatment with placebo (p=0.7). Thus, the results showed a significant reduction in CCK-4-induced panic rates without significant differences between escitalopram and placebo conditions. There were no significant effects of either treatment on any other variable of anxiety or cardiovascular indices. Secondary analysis showed no effect of gender or 5-HTTLPR polymorphism on response to CCK-4 challenge. This study demonstrated that in contrast to the findings in patients with panic disorder, in CCK-4-sensitive healthy volunteers the treatment with an antipanic SSRI did not cause a reduction of CCK-4-induced panic attacks beyond the effect of placebo. The mechanisms behind this discrepancy and the reasons of the decrease in sensitivity to CCK-4 challenge on repeated administration remain to be clarified in future studies.     

Clomipramine, a better reference drug for panic/agoraphobia. II. Psychomotor and cognitive effects

The present reference drugs for the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia are imipramine and alprazolam. The latter decreases performance and cognitive functioning. No study of such functions in panic/agoraphobia is available. Fifty four out-patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PAG), taking part in a parallel groups controlled trial of imipramine (mean dose ±SEM 114±9 mg), clomipramine (50±4 mg) and propanteline (active placebo) over 8 weeks, were studied. A test battery of psychomotor and memory tests was administered at baseline, and after 1, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Their results were compared (at baseline and at the end of the trial) with those of a control group of 57 normal untreated subjects. There was no difference between treatments, and no drug effect on any test at any time. No consistent difference between patients and controls was detected. Given its apparently higher potency, and the absence of deleterious effects on cognitive measures known to be affected by benzodiazepines, we conclude that clomipramine is better than imipramine or alprazolam as a reference drug for panic/agoraphobia.     

The relationship of alprazolam dose to steady-state plasma concentrations

Alprazolam is a widely used antianxiety agent, yet relatively little is known about the relationship between chronic oral doses and steady-state plasma levels. This study examines the relationship over a wide range of therapeutic doses. We conducted a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 36 patients with agoraphobia with panic attacks, or panic disorder with limited phobic avoidance based on DSM-III criteria. Patients received alprazolam (N = 25) or placebo (N = 11) beginning at 1 mg/day and increased weekly until either a maximum tolerated dose or 10 mg/day was achieved. Dosages were then gradually tapered according to a predetermined schedule. The entire study period lasted 14 weeks. Laboratory and clinical assessments were conducted weekly. Doses up to 6 mg/day were tolerated by 80% of patients on alprazolam and doses of 10 mg/day were tolerated by 40% of patients. Twenty-seven percent of the placebo patients reached 10 tablets/day. In the alprazolam group, the principal cause of intolerance was sedation. Throughout the study no significant changes in vital signs or laboratory parameters were observed. Steady state alprazolam, 4-hydroxy alprazolam, and alpha-hydroxy alprazolam plasma levels were linearly related to dose. A 1 mg dosage increment produced, on the average, a corresponding 10 ng/ml increase in steady state level of the parent drug. Significant response was observed in subjects who achieved concentrations greater than 20 ng/ml, with a maximum of 81% of the samples classified as responders within the 60 ng/ml and above group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A pooled, double-blind comparison of the effects of buspirone, diazepam and placebo in women with chronic anxiety

Pooled data were analyzed for 367 female patients enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial comparing buspirone, a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic, and diazepam in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. After a 4 to 7-day wash-out period, patients were allocated at random to receive one or other of the trial medications or placebo over a 4-week period. Mean daily dosages were 24.5 mg for buspirone and 20.8 mg for diazepam (range 10 mg to 60 mg for both drugs). Patients were assessed on entry and at weekly intervals using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and at the end of treatment both patients and physicians gave an overall opinion of response to treatment. Details of adverse events were also recorded. The results showed that both buspirone and diazepam were approximately equal in efficacy and superior to placebo. Menstruation and the occurrence of premenstrual tension did not alter the anxiolytic activity of either drug. Patients taking diazepam had significantly more adverse effects, i.e. drowsiness, weakness, fatigue, inco-ordination and depression, than did those in the buspirone group. In a separate commentary, the anxiety disorder and the data from the study are reviewed to place them in the overall perspective of gynaecological care.     

A comparison of buspirone, diazepam, and placebo in patients with chronic anxiety states

Buspirone is an antianxiety compound that has been extensively evaluated in clinical trials: it has proved superior to placebo and comparable to diazepam in the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder. In this study, 33 outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder were entered into a crossover study of 3 weeks each of placebo, buspirone 10 to 30 mg daily, and diazepam 10 to 30 mg daily. Psychiatrist and patient ratings were made, together with psychological tests and EEG and skin conductance measures before and after each treatment. Of the nine dropouts, six were on buspirone at the time of dropout. For the remaining 24 patients, the mean daily doses attained of buspirone and diazepam were both 20 mg. On most clinical ratings diazepam was superior to buspirone and placebo, which did not differ. Diazepam produced minor psychomotor changes and the expected major effects on the EEG. Buspirone was without effect. Side effects on buspirone were mainly nausea and giddiness and on diazepam, drowsiness. The lack of efficacy of buspirone is discussed in terms of the previous benzodiazepine exposure--23/24 patients had had previous exposure and only 10 were able to tolerate a pretrial placebo washout period. The implications are considerable for the introduction of any new antianxiety agent not cross-tolerant with the benzodiazepines into a chronically anxious group of patients with previous long-term benzodiazepine therapy.     

A fixed-dose study of alprazolam 2 mg, alprazolam 6 mg, and placebo in panic disorder.

A recently reported multinational, 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy of alprazolam versus placebo in the treatment of panic disorder indicated significant differences favoring alprazolam. We now report the results of a three-site, 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study comparing alprazolam 2 mg, alprazolam 6 mg, and placebo in 94 patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Both alprazolam treatment groups (6 mg and 2 mg) improved significantly more than did the placebo treatment group on most outcome measures. Only a few statistically significant differences between the 6 mg and 2 mg alprazolam groups were discerned, although the pattern of treatment response across measures suggested a dose effect. Dropouts in the placebo group were primarily due to lack of efficacy and in the alprazolam 6 mg group were due to side effects, which may have contributed to the limited differences between groups at study end. The findings suggest that many patients may require less than 6 mg of alprazolam per day for effective treatment of panic disorder.     

Effects of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist flesinoxan in panic disorder

The effects of flesinoxan, a potent and selective 5-HT_1A agonist, were studied in two pilot studies in panic disorder patients to explore the role of 5-HT_1A receptors in the mechanism of action of antipanic agents. This paper reports on the results of these two studies with flesinoxan. In study I, using a single-blind crossover design, five patients were treated for 1 week with placebo, 4 weeks with flesinoxan (up to 2.4 mg per day), and 2 weeks with placebo. In study II, 15 patients were enrolled in a double-blind, three-armed study with placebo and two dosages of flesinoxan. After a single-blind placebo run-in phase of 1 week, patients were treated for 8 weeks with placebo, 0.6 or 1.2 mg/day flesinoxan. In pilot study I patients’ condition worsened during the 4-week flesinoxan treatment period. Anxiety was frequently reported as an adverse event. Symptoms returned to the pre-treatment level during the 2-week placebo washout period. In pilot study II, no treatment effects in either group were observed. Anxiety as an adverse event was less prominent than in the first pilot study. A lowering of mood was seen in some patients. The sample sizes of these two pilot studies are too small to draw firm conclusions on the efficacy of flesinoxan in panic disorder, but the present data are not encouraging in this respect. The worsening of symptoms seen with the highest dose of flesinoxan is intriguing and might give a clue to the understanding of the mechanism underlying similar effects seen with antidepressants in panic disorder patients.     

Crossover trial of pagoclone and placebo in patients with DSM-IV panic disorder

Pagoclone is a cyclopyrrolone that is believed to act as a partial agonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A/benzodiazepine (BDZ) receptor. In theory, such partial agonists should be anxiolytic but lack the adverse side-effects of sedation, tolerance and withdrawal associated with full GABA-A/BDZ agonists. The objective of the randomized double-blind crossover study was to assess whether pagoclone was an effective anti-panic agent and also to assess its side-effect profile. Patients recruited had a diagnosis of Panic Disorder (DSM-IV) with at least one panic attack per week. Following a 2-week screening period, patients entered a 6-week trial consisting of two 2-week treatment periods, each followed by a 1-week washout. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either pagoclone 0.1 mg t.d.s. or placebo on their first treatment period and the converse on their second. The primary measure was daily panic attack dairy. Fourteen patients completed the study, the mean number of panic attacks during screening was 5.8+/-0.8 (SEM), this fell to 3.6+/-0.5 during treatment with pagoclone (p = 0.05) and 4.3+/-0.8 with placebo (p = 0.14). There was no significant difference on direct comparison of pagoclone with placebo or in any of the secondary measures (including Rickels withdrawal scale) or the adverse event profiles. The study provides preliminary evidence that pagoclone has anxiolytic properties in the absence of typical BDZ side-effects. This is consistent with its theoretical mode of action as a partial agonist at the GABA(A)/BDZ receptor.     

Flumazenil-precipitated panic and dysphoria in patients dependent on benzodiazepines: a possible aid to abstinence

Ten long-term users of benzodiazepines (average daily dose, 20 mg of diazepam or equivalent) who had experienced problems in withdrawing from the drugs were given an i.v. challenge with either the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (1 mg injected over 30 s) or placebo (vehicle solution) in a randomized double-blind design. There were no 'pseudo withdrawal' responses to either single-blind or double-blind placebo injections, whereas flumazenil produced dramatic panic reactions in all four subjects tested, followed by characteristic benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms. There were also small but significant rises in pulse rate and blood pressure, but no change in serum cortisol. Flumazenil-induced panic could not be entirely accounted for by a past or present diagnosis of panic disorder, and did not seem to be related to previous withdrawal problems, present benzodiazepine dosage, or to the severity of withdrawal symptoms precipitated by flumazenil in the same challenge test. Attempts to reduce benzodiazepine intake over the next 3 weeks tended to be more successful in the flumazenil group. The results are discussed with reference to possible changes in the GABA-benzodiazepine system in long-term benzodiazepine users.     

The effect of mirtazapine in panic disorder: an open label pilot study with a single-blind placebo run-in period.

In this open label pilot study, we studied the efficacy of mirtazapine (Remeron) in panic disorder. Twenty-eight patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia (10 males/18 females), were included and 19 patients completed the study. The 15-week trial started with a 3-week single-blind placebo run-in period. After this run-in period, the 12-week active treatment phase started. As primary efficacy measures, we studied the decrease in the number of full symptom panic attacks and the number of patients completely free of panic during the last 3 weeks of the study. Seventy-four percent of the patients were considered responders, according to a decrease of at least 50% in panic attack frequency. All primary and secondary efficacy measures showed a significant improvement from the second week of active treatment onwards to endpoint. The main side-effects were different from the usual side-effects in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (initial drowsiness, weight gain and pain in the legs). The results of this open label study in panic disorder suggest that mirtazapine seems to be a fast and effective treatment alternative for SSRIs in panic disorder.     

Imipramine and buspirone in patients with panic disorder who are discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine therapy

Pretreatment with imipramine, buspirone, or placebo was compared in 40 patients meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition criteria for panic disorder and in patients who were discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine use. The average duration of benzodiazepine use was 75 +/- 64 months, and the average benzodiazepine intake expressed as diazepam equivalents was 25.7 +/- 19 mg/d. We hypothesized that pretreatment with either imipramine or buspirone, in contrast to pretreatment with placebo, would lead to a significant decrease of symptoms of anxiety and depression before tapering benzodiazepines, thus making the taper process easier to complete. All 3 treatments (imipramine, buspirone, and placebo) caused a reduction in anxiety and depression symptoms as measured by changes in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Neither discontinuation severity nor taper-free status 12 weeks posttaper differed between the 3 treatment groups.     

Flumazenil-precipitated withdrawal symptoms in chronic users of therapeutic doses of diazepam

A prototype benzodiazepine (BDZ) antagonist, flumazenil (1 mg, i.v.) or placebo was administered to eight chronic users (5-15 years) of therapeutic doses of diazepam (10-25 mg/d), in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design in order to evaluate the presence of physiological dependence. The three patients receiving flumazenil developed anxiety reactions, with significant increases in bodily and psychological symptoms, as measured by rating scales. In two these amounted to a panic attack. Subjects on placebo tended to show decreases in measures of anxiety. The severity of precipitated reactions was not related to the total cumulative exposure to diazepam, but to a history of panic attacks. Previous panic may increase the vulnerability to severe reactions to flumazenil.