Late results of two hundred seventeen femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments

A 10-year-experience of 217 femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments in 207 patients is reported. Thirty-three femoropopliteal bypasses (15%) were performed with reversed saphenous vein and 184 (85%) with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Operative indications were gangrene in 121 (56%), nonhealing ulceration in 40 (18%), ischemic rest pain in 51 (24%), and claudication in 5 (2%) cases. The 5-year primary graft patency rate of these bypasses was 59% (reversed saphenous vein, 74%; polytetrafluoroethylene, 55%; p less than 0.05), the secondary 5-year graft patency rate was 61% (reversed saphenous vein, 79%; polytetrafluoroethylene, 56%; p less than 0.05), and the 5-year limb salvage rate was 78% (reversed saphenous vein, 78%; polytetrafluoroethylene, 78%). The 30-day operative mortality rate was 10%, and the 5-year patient survival rate was 38%. Eleven patients (5%) required lower extremity amputation because of progressive gangrene or extensive infection despite a patent bypass to an isolated popliteal artery segment. We conclude that femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments (1) have acceptable 5-year graft patency and limb salvage rates; (2) should be performed with reversed saphenous vein grafts when possible; (3) may be performed with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts if necessary, with a resulting limb salvage rate equal to that of reversed saphenous vein grafts; and (4) require sequential extension to an infrapopliteal artery in up to 20% of patients. In addition, the presence of an isolated popliteal artery segment is associated with a high operative mortality rate and limited life expectancy because of coronary artery disease.     

Saphenous vein versus PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. A review of the literature.

The autogenous saphenous vein is considered the best bypass graft material for arterial bypasses below the inguinal ligament. However, a synthetic graft or prosthesis is considered an acceptable alternative, especially when the distal anastomosis is situated above the knee. Some studies even suggest that patency rates for vein and synthetic grafts are comparable, whereas others indicate that a vein graft is superior to a prosthetic graft, even above the knee. To test the hypothesis that both vein grafts and synthetic prostheses are equally beneficial in the above-knee position, we performed a systematic review of available studies comparing the patency of saphenous vein and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as bypass material. English and German medical literature from 1966 to 2002 was searched using Medline, and 25 articles meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. The patency of venous bypasses was superior to that of PTFE bypasses at all time intervals studied. After 2 years, the primary patency rate of venous bypasses was 81% as compared to 67% for PTFE bypasses, and after 5 years it was 69 and 49%, respectively. After 5 years, the secondary patency of PTFE bypasses reached 60%. When only randomized trials were considered, venous bypasses were again superior to PTFE bypasses at all intervals studied. After 2 years, the primary patency rate of venous and PTFE bypasses was 80 and 69%, respectively, and after 5 years it was 74 and 39%, respectively. Since both randomized and retrospective studies comparing venous with PTFE bypasses showed that vein grafts were 'better' than PTFE prostheses, the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the two types of graft material was rejected (p=0.008). We conclude from this systematic review that if a saphenous vein is available, a venous bypass should be chosen at all times, even if patients have an anticipated short life expectancy (<2 years). If the saphenous vein is absent or not suitable for bypass grafting, PTFE is a good alternative as bypass material.     

Comparison of expanded PTFE and vein grafts in lower extremity arterial reconstructions

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypasses were used in a series of arterial reconstructions to the popliteal artery (45) and to arteries below that level (11). These were performed in high-risk situations in patients who lacked a suitable saphenous vein. Vein bypasses were performed in a comparable series of high-risk situations in patients having a suitable autologous saphenous vein (45 to the level of the popliteal artery and 11 to an artery below that level). PTFE patency rates at 4-14 months were 43 to 45 (96%) for the femoro-popliteal reconstructions (with a limb salvage rate of 39 to 45 or 87%) and 5 of 11 (45%) for the distal bypasses. Saphenous vein bypass patency rates at 8-14 months were 39 of 45 (87%) for the femoropopliteal reconstructions (with a limb salvage rate of 36 of 45 or 80%) and 5 of 11 (45%) for the distal bypasses. These results justify continued use of PTFE grafts in patients without saphenous veins who require lower extremity arterial reconstructions for limb salvage. The exact place of PTFE grafts in arterial reconstructive surgery of the lower extremity definition based on longer periods of observation.     

PTFE-vein composite grafts for critical limb ischaemia: a valuable alternative to all-autogenous infrageniculate reconstructions.

OBJECTIVES: to analyse the long-term results of primary composite bypass grafts comparing them to PTFE and vein grafts. DESIGN: a retrospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: between 1980 and 1996, 568 primary infrageniculate bypass procedures were performed; a saphenous-vein graft was used in 428 procedures, a PTFE graft in 44 and a composite PTFE-saphenous-vein graft in 96. Thirty-six composite grafts were below the knee and the remaining 60 extended more distally. Twenty-one bypass grafts from the latter group were sequential. Mean follow-up was 45.6 months. Five-year primary and secondary patency and limb salvage rates were compared by life-table analysis. RESULTS: cumulative 5-year primary patency for composite grafts was 58% and for saphenous-vein grafts 74%, while secondary patency rate was 75% and 82%, respectively (p <0.05). The 5-year limb salvage rate was 80% for composite grafts and 88% for saphenous-vein grafts (p >0.05). The primary and secondary patency and limb salvage rate for PTFE grafts was 24%, 31% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Composite grafts of PTFE and saphenous vein are significantly superior to PTFE graft alone and should be used in patients who lack sufficient length of saphenous vein.     

Patency of infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafts with distal interposition vein cuffs

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic bypasses in the lower extremity have poor patency rates, particularly in limb salvage cases. Patency and limb salvage rates of PTFE bypasses supplemented by distal interposition vein cuffs were assessed in patients requiring revascularization for critical limb ischemia, in the absence of a suitable autologous saphenous vein. Between October 1993 and April 1996, 163 patients underwent 185 infrainguinal bypasses. Forty-three limbs in 42 patients (12 women, 30 men; mean age 67 years) did not have a suitable autologous saphenous vein (24%) and had femoropopliteal (20) and infrapopliteal (23) bypasses performed. Patients were examined prospectively at 3-month intervals during the first year and at 6-month intervals thereafter to determine graft patency and limb salvage. Postoperative anticoagulation with warfarin was used in 26 patients. Indications for operation included limb salvage in 41 extremities (21 rest pain/ulceration or gangrene, 20 rest pain alone), and disabling claudication in two. Patients were followed clinically for 2–30 months (mean 10 months). Cumulative 2-year life-table patencies for all grafts, femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal bypasses were 64%, 75% and 62%, respectively. Previous primary patencies at the authors' institution for PTFE bypasses without vein cuffs were 35%, 46% and 12% for the same categories. Cumulative life-table limb salvage for all PTFE/vein cuff bypasses in the present series was 76% compared with 37% in previous PTFE bypasses without vein cuffs. Adjunctive use of distal interposition vein cuffs improves prosthetic graft patency, while producing satisfactory limb salvage. Postoperative anticoagulation did not influence graft patency. PTFE/vein cuff for lower-extremity revascularization shows good 2-year patency and is an acceptable alternate conduit in patients with critical limb ischemia when autologous saphenous vein is absent.     

The multiple sequential distal bypass graft: seven-year follow-up

Thirty-nine infrainguinal bypass grafts with multiple sequential distal anastomoses were performed on 35 patients ranging in age from 32 to 79 years (mean 65.8 years) with severe femoropopliteal occlusive disease. Thirty-eight procedures were performed for limb salvage indications. Distal anastomoses were performed to the popliteal-anterior tibial arteries in seven procedures, the popliteal-posterior tibial arteries in six, the popliteal-peroneal arteries in six, the anterior tibial-peroneal arteries in eight, the posterior tibial-peroneal arteries in 10, and the posterior tibial-anterior tibial arteries in two. Saphenous vein was the graft material in 31 procedures (in situ in two), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in four, and saphenous vein-PTFE composite in four. The mean Doppler ankle-arm index was 0.38 +/- 0.14 preoperatively and 0.89 +/- 0.13 postoperatively. The early (30-day) graft patency rate was 93%. With life-table analysis, the long-term primary patency rate was 70% at 1 year, 61% at 3 years, and 52% at 7 years for saphenous vein grafts; the secondary patency rate was 65% at 7 years for saphenous vein grafts. The secondary patency rate for PTFE and PTFE-vein composite grafts was 75% at 1 year, 50% at 3 years, and 17% at 5 years. Cumulative life-table limb salvage rates were 91% at 1 year, 85% at 5 years, and 61% at 7 years. The multiple sequential distal bypass graft is durable and highly efficacious in achieving limb salvage.     

Tibial Bypass Using Complex Autologous Conduit: Patency and Limb Salvage

Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%, p < 0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.     

Results of bypasses to the anterior tibial artery through the interosseous membrane

The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the results of anatomically tunneled grafts to the anterior tibial artery for distal revascularization in terms of patency and limb salvage rates as well as local morbidity, which can lengthen the postoperative hospital stay. Twenty-three patients received 24 bypasses to the anterior tibial artery, with grafts tunneled through the interosseous membrane. The mean age was 67 years; 10 patients were diabetic, 12 were smokers, 9 presented with significant coronary artery disease, and 2 with chronic renal insufficiency. The donor vessel was the common femoral artery in 17 cases, the superficial femoral artery in 4, and the infra-articular popliteal artery in 3. The graft material consisted in the reversed saphenous vein in 4 cases, the non-reversed devalvulated ex situ saphenous vein in 11, composite polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) + inversed saphenous vein in 6, and PTFE alone in 3 cases. No postoperative mortality was observed, nor was there postoperative graft occlusion or need for major amputation. The average postoperative length of stay in the hospital was 9.7 days. Two local surgical wound complications were observed, which did not necessitate a postoperative hospital stay exceeding 15 days. Cumulative primary patency and limb salvage rates at 3 years were 50% and 70%, respectively. Anatomic tunneling of grafts to the anterior tibial artery yields patency and limb salvage rates comparable to those reported in the literature for distal bypasses and, considered overall, an acceptably low local morbidity and short hospital stay. Definitive superiority over externally tunneled grafts, however, is not definitely demonstrated by this study and should be prospectively tested. Received: 9 May 1997     

Sequential femoropopliteal and femorotibial bypasses. A ten-year follow-up study

Since 1970, we have performed 33 sequential femoropopliteal bypass grafts (of 482 femoropopliteal bypasses [7%]) and 22 sequential femorotibial bypass grafts (of 153 femorotibial bypasses [14%]). Patients ranged in age from 51 to 90 years. Twenty-two (66%) of the sequential femoropopliteal bypass grafts, and all of the sequential femorotibial bypass grafts, were for limb salvage. By life table analysis, interval patency rates for both types of sequential procedures at 60 months, 72 months, and even longer are good (greater than 80% for both sequential femoropopliteal and sequential femorotibial bypasses). These two sequential bypasses are effective alternatives when the saphenous vein is inadequate. We assume that these results are due to excellent inflow (using a prosthetic graft proximally) and the use of a segment of autogenous saphenous vein over the knee joint.     

Factors affecting the patency of infrainguinal bypass

Two hundred forty-nine well-characterized difficult distal bypasses, entered into a multicenter dextran 40 trial, were reevaluated after 3 years. Seventy in situ (IS) vein grafts, 49 reversed saphenous (RS) vein grafts, 60 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts, and 70 umbilical vein (UV) grafts were used. Primary and secondary patency rates at 3 years were, respectively, 84% and 90% for IS, 66% and 73% for RS, 35% and 48% for PTFE, and 24% and 32% for UV. Subgroup analysis according to the site of distal anastomosis showed no significant differences in primary patency among these grafts at the above-knee level but significant differences between both vein grafts (IS and RV) and the others (PTFE and UV) below the knee (78% vs 31%, respectively). This difference increased at the tibial level (78% vs 10%) but there was also a significant difference between IS grafts (88%) and RS grafts (63%) at this level. Hazard functional analysis showed all grafts except IS grafts begin to fail at an increasing rate again by 24 months. Although overall results appeared to favor PTFE over UV, 62% of PTFE vs 16% of UV terminated at the above-knee level and the patency results of these two grafts were not significantly different at any level. The only other factor than graft type and distal anastomotic site that consistently correlated with late patency was tobacco use. Diabetic patients actually fared significantly better than nondiabetic patients, presumably because of the higher use of IS grafts and lower use of tobacco. The choice of graft overshadows all other factors affecting patency and its influence is magnified with more distal terminal anastomosis.     

Composite sequential bypasses to the ankle and beyond for limb salvage

Composite grafts of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and saphenous vein were used for sequential bypasses to the ankle and foot in 35 men and 19 women (mean age 66.5 years). Presenting symptoms were rest pain (25), digital gangrene (19), and ischemic ulcer (10). Thirty-one tibial and 23 pedal bypasses were done and were followed up to 48 months (mean 26.4 months). The ankle pressure index rose from 0.31 ± 0.11 preoperatively to 0.77 ± 0.21 postoperatively. Mean graft flows were 34.8 ml/min. Composite sequential grafts took 51 minutes longer to perform than femoral-tibial vein grafts. Patency rates by the life-table method were 81.4% at 2 years and 72.4% at 4 years. Graft failures after the first 10 weeks usually led to amputation. Use of PTFE as an inflow conduit permits otherwise inadequate lengths of saphenous vein to be used for anastomosis to delicate distal vessels and takes advantage of the vein's ability to tolerate low flows. Our experience suggests that the excellent patency rates make sequential bypasses a reasonable option for limb salvage. (J VASC SURG 1984;1:381-6.)     

Femoral-tibial bypass for calcific arterial disease

Overt calcification of the recipient artery and outflow bed has been regarded as a poor prognostic factor for femoral-distal arterial bypass patency and subsequent wound healing. In order to determine the short- and long-term limb salvage and graft patency rates achieved in these patients, the records of 35 patients undergoing 38 attempted femoral-tibial bypasses to a calcified recipient artery were reviewed. Two patients were unreconstructable at the time of surgery. Thirty-one of the 36 operations (86 percent) were performed using in situ saphenous vein bypass techniques, 3 were performed with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), 1 with a composite sequential, and 1 with a composite vein graft. Immediate limb salvage was achieved in 31 of 36 limbs (86 percent). Five early below-knee amputations (14 percent) were required, two due to graft thromboses and three due to progressive foot necrosis despite patent grafts. One patient (3 percent) died secondary to sepsis. Three-year primary graft patency and limb salvage rates did not differ significantly from bypasses to noncalcified vessels. Femoral-distal bypass in the presence of overt calcific arterial disease may be successfully accomplished and offers an excellent prognosis for long-term graft patency and limb salvage.     

Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing a Pre-cuffed Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft to a Vein Cuffed Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft for Infragenicular Arterial Bypass

Poor patency of synthetic grafts for infragenicular revascularization has led to use of distal vein patches or cuffs. The aim of this study was to compare the distally widened Distaflo^TM PTFE graft, which mimics a vein cuff, with a PTFE graft with distal vein modification. In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial we compared use of a precuffed PTFE graft wit that of PTFE grafts with distal vein modification for infragenicular revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia without saphenous vein. Study end points were primary and secondary patency and limb salvage rates at 2 years. From January 28,1999 to November 1, 2000, 104 patients were enrolled in 10 North American centers. Thirteen were excluded for protocol violation. Ninety-one bypasses were performed in 89 patients with a mean age of 73 years (range 47-90). By randomization, 47 bypasses were done with the precuffed graft and 44 with PTFE graft with vein cuff. Both groups were comparable for comorbidities and operative variables, except for a higher incidence of acute ischemia in the precuffed group (19% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.03). Bypass was a redo procedure in 53% and was performed at the infrapopliteal vessels in 79%. Operative mortality was 2.2% (2/91). Mean follow-up was 14 months (range 1-30). At 1 and 2 years, primary patency was 52% and 49% for the precuffed group and 62% and 44% for the vein cuffed group, respectively (p = 0.53). At 1 year and 2 years, the limb salvage rate was 72% and 65% for the precuffed group and 75% and 62% in the vein cuffed group (p = 0.88). Although numbers are small and follow-up short, this midterm analysis shows similar results for the Distaflo precuffed grafts and PTFE grafts with vein cuff. A precuffed graft is a reasonable alternative conduit for infragenicular reconstruction in the absence of saphenous vein and provides favorable limb salvage.Presented at the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Chicago, IL, June 7, 2003.See Appendix 1 for list of Distaflo^TM trial investigators and participating centers.     

Vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Controversy still exists whether polytetrafluoroethylene is equivalent to vein as bypass graft material for the above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Therefore, a prospective randomized trial was performed to compare vein with polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypasses with the distal anastomosis above the knee. METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 1996, 151 above-knee femoropopliteal bypasses were performed. The indications for operation were severe claudication in 120 cases, rest pain in 20 cases, and ulceration in 11 cases. After randomization, 75 reversed saphenous venous bypasses and 76 polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses were performed. RESULTS: No perioperative mortality was seen, and 5% of the patients had minor infections of the wound, not resulting in loss of the bypass, the limb, or life. After 5 years, 38% of the patients had died and 7% were lost to follow-up. Only once was the saphenous vein necessary for coronary artery bypass grafting. Primary patency rates after 5 years were 75.6% for venous bypass grafts and 51.9% for polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (P =.035). Secondary patency rates were 79.7% for vein and 57.2% for polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses (P =.036). In the venous group, 14 bypasses failed, leading to five new bypasses. In the polytetrafluoroethylene group, 29 bypasses failed, leading to 16 reinterventions. For these 16 new bypasses, in four cases, the ipsilateral preserved saphenous vein was used. In both groups, one above-knee amputation and one below-knee amputation had to be performed. CONCLUSION: We conclude after 5 years of follow-up of this randomized controlled trial that a bypass with saphenous vein has better patency rates at all intervals and needs fewer reoperations. Saphenous vein should be the graft material of choice for above-knee femoropopliteal bypasses and should not be preserved for reinterventions. Polytetrafluoroethylene is an acceptable alternative if the saphenous vein is not available.     

A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction

Despite the recent popularity of the in situ saphenous vein graft for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction, considerable doubt exists as to whether this approach offers any real advantage over conventional reversed vein grafts. Therefore we have reviewed our experience with 675 infrainguinal vein grafts undertaken during the past 10 years. There have been no substantial modifications in the technique used for 535 reversed vein grafts over the 10-year period. During the past 3 years, 140 in situ vein grafts have been carried out with the Leather valvulotome used to incise the venous valves. Life-table analysis of 449 femoropopliteal reversed saphenous vein grafts demonstrated 1- and 3-year cumulative patency rates of 81% and 73%, respectively, and a 5-year patency rate of 63%. Seventy-five femoropopliteal in situ bypasses demonstrated a patency rate of 85% at both 1- and 3-year intervals. Cumulative patency rates for 86 femoroinfrapopliteal reversed saphenous vein grafts were 64% and 62% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Comparable patency rates for 65 infrapopliteal in situ saphenous vein grafts remained stable at 87% for 3 years. Fifteen of the in situ bypasses were anastomosed to vessels at the ankle or foot level, whereas none of the reversed bypasses was carried that far distally. This experience with both in situ and reversed techniques on one service by the same surgeons demonstrates a clear superiority of the in situ saphenous vein graft for infrapopliteal reconstruction at the 3-year interval.     

Axillopopliteal bypass for limb salvage.

Forty-one axillopopliteal bypass grafts have been placed in 30 patients for limb salvage in the past 12 years. The mean patient age was 65.6 years; 8 were women; 19 smoked; and six had diabetes. Sixteen grafts were straight axillopopliteal bypass grafts, and 25 were sequential axillopopliteal bypass grafts. Cumulative life-table primary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 70%, 56%, and 43%, respectively; secondary patency rates were 73%, 57%, and 50%, respectively. Corresponding limb salvage rates were 86%, 69%, and 69%, respectively. Ringed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft patency at 3 years was 61% versus 40% for unsupported PTFE grafts (p = 0.35). Ringed PTFE axillofemoral grafts with sequential femoropopliteal saphenous vein grafts had a 3-year patency of 67%. Graft patency was restored in 25% of occluded grafts by thrombectomy and in 80% of occluded grafts by thrombectomy with graft revision (p = 0.21). Cumulative 3-year patient survival was 48%. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 20%; patients operated on for graft infection had a 30-day operative mortality rate of 36%. The data support the use of axillopopliteal bypass for limb salvage when standard revascularization techniques are contraindicated. Long-term patency is enhanced by use of externally supported PTFE and sequential femoropopliteal saphenous vein.     

Bypass graft to the midpopliteal artery with a combined anterior and posterior approach

PURPOSE: The medial supragenicular and infragenicular approaches to the popliteal artery were introduced almost 50 years ago and replaced the posterior approach to the popliteal artery for distal graft implantation. We review a contemporary series of bypass grafts to the midpopliteal artery by use of a combined anterior and posterior approach to evaluate its potential clinical benefits. TECHNIQUE: After the proximal graft anastomosis is constructed, an incision is made in the popliteal fossa to access the midpopliteal artery, the graft is passed into that incision, and all but the popliteal incision is closed. The patient is turned, the midpopliteal artery dissection is completed, and the graft is anastomosed distally. METHODS: Fifty-seven bypass grafts, implanted distally on the midpopliteal artery by this technique over a 13-year period, chosen in preference to an infragenicular bypass graft in selected patients when a supragenicular bypass was not feasible, were assessed in terms of indications for surgery, conduit type, complications, length of postoperative hospitalization, and graft patency. RESULTS: Bypass grafting originated from the axillary artery in two cases, the common iliac artery in one case, and the femoral artery in 54 cases. The procedure was performed in five patients with a popliteal trifurcation anomaly, nine patients with a blind popliteal segment, 20 patients with limited length of autologous vein, and five patients with an above-knee graft infection requiring an alternate path for revascularization. Autologous vein was used in 35 and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 19 bypass grafts. Three other patients had a composite sequential femoral-popliteal-tibial bypass graft, with PTFE and autologous vein. Postoperative (30 day) complications include one death (composite sequential), one stroke (PTFE), and one graft thrombosis (saphenous vein). The mean postoperative hospitalization for the last 31 patients was 4.2 +/- 3.7 days. In the autologous vein group, the 1-year primary patency rate was 87%, and the primary assisted patency rate was 94%. In the PTFE group, the 1-year primary patency rate was 72%. Two composite sequential grafts remained patent at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Bypass grafting to the midpopliteal artery with a combined anterior and posterior approach offers a safe and effective option to below-knee bypass grafting when an above-knee bypass grafting is not feasible. Compared with the medial infragenicular incision, the posterior incision results in reduced morbidity rates, rapid mobilization, and early hospital discharge.     

Arm veins for arterial revascularization of the leg: arteriographic and clinical observations

The results of 160 infrainguinal bypasses with arm vein grafts were analyzed. Seventy-three arteriograms were reviewed to identify early and late graft defects; arteriographic findings paralleled those described for saphenous vein grafts. Intimal fibrosis during the first postoperative year, observed in 16 grafts, was the most common defect. Aneurysmosis and elongation were rare, resulting in two graft replacements. Patency and limb salvage rates were calculated for 88 single-length femorodistal bypass grafts; the other 72 were inflow (eight) or outflow (22) jump grafts, sequential (eight) and composite autogenous vein grafts (34). The primary and secondary patency rates for single-length grafts were 74% and 80% at 1 year and 51% and 57% at 5 years, respectively. The limb salvage rate at 5 years was 82%. The survival rate for all patients was 44% at 5 years. These findings reconfirm our use of arm veins as bypass grafts when the saphenous vein is unavailable.     

Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions

Autologous saphenous vein (ASV) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts were compared in 845 infrainguinal bypass operations, 485 to the popliteal artery and 360 to infrapopliteal arteries. Life-table primary patency rates for randomized PTFE grafts to the popliteal artery paralleled those for randomized ASV grafts to the same level for 2 years and then became significantly different (4-year patency rate of 68% +/- 8% [SE] for ASV vs. 47% +/- 9% for PTFE, p less than 0.025). Four-year patency differences for randomized above-knee grafts were not statistically significant (61% +/- 12% for ASV vs. 38% +/- 13% for PTFE, p greater than 0.25) but were for randomized below-knee grafts (76% +/- 9% for ASV vs. 54% +/- 11% for PTFE, p less than 0.05). Four-year limb salvage rates after bypasses to the popliteal artery to control critical ischemia did not differ for the two types of randomized grafts (75% +/- 10% for ASV vs. 70% +/- 10% for PTFE, p greater than 0.25). Although primary patency rates for randomized and obligatory PTFE grafts to the popliteal artery were significantly different (p less than 0.025), 4-year limb salvage rates were not (70% +/- 10% vs. 68% +/- 20%, p greater than 0.25). Primary patency rates at 4 years for infrapopliteal bypasses with randomized ASV were significantly better than those with randomized PTFE (49% +/- 10% vs. 12% +/- 7%, p less than 0.001). Limb salvage rates at 3 1/2 years for infrapopliteal bypasses with both randomized grafts (57% +/- 10% for ASV and 61% +/- 10% for PTFE) were better than those for obligatory infrapopliteal PTFE grafts (38% +/- 11%, p less than 0.01). These results fail to support the routine preferential use of PTFE grafts for either femoropopliteal or more distal bypasses. However, this graft may be used preferentially in selected poor-risk patients for femoropopliteal bypasses, particularly those that do not cross the knee. Although every effort should be made to use ASV for infrapopliteal bypasses, a PTFE distal bypass is a better option than a primary major amputation.     

复合移植物股-远端动脉旁路术(附8例报道)

目的：初步报道和评价复合材料移植物行膝下动脉旁路术挽救缺血肢体的结果。方法：８例缺乏合适自体静脉的病人应用复合移植物行膝下动脉旁路术,复合移植物近侧段为人造血管（ＰＴＦＥ）,远侧段为自体静脉,自体静脉跨越膝关节,术后应用节段性动脉压测定（踝／肱指数）、双功彩超和动脉ＤＳＡ检查进行随访。结果：所有病人术后症状明显改善,静息痛消失,平均踝肱指数由术前的０．２１提高到０．６７,术后平均随访时间约１年,随访期间双功彩超和动脉造影检查显示移植物通畅,１例病人术后２个月因移植物血栓形成,经再次手术后症状缓解。结论：当肢体面临严重缺血需行膝下动脉旁路术而又缺乏可供移植的自体静脉时,复合移植物旁路术提供了一种有效的方法。