Successful treatment of urgent bleeding in von Willebrand disease with factor VIII/VWF concentrate (Humate-P®): use of the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) to measure potency and to guide therapy

This prospective, open-label, non-randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of factor VIII (FVIII)/von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentrate (Humate-P) using treatment regimens based on VWF:ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity in patients with von Willebrand Disease (VWD) in (i) urgent bleeding episodes, or (ii) in patients undergoing urgent and necessary surgery. This article summarizes the results of treatment for the 33 patients with 53 urgent bleeding events. The median loading dose of FVIII/VWF concentrate was 67.0 international units per kilogram (IU kg(-1)) VWF:RCo (range 25.7-143.2 IU kg(-1)), and the median daily maintenance dose per infusion was 74.0 IU kg(-1) (range 16.4-182.9 IU kg(-1)) for a median duration of 2 days (range 1-34 days). The overall efficacy (achievement of haemostasis) of FVIII/VWF concentrate was rated as excellent/good for 98% of the urgent bleeding events. No unexpected treatment-related adverse events or serious drug-related adverse events (AEs) were observed. This study supports the safety and efficacy of Humate-P administered in doses calculated in VWF:RCo units for the treatment of urgent bleeding episodes in patients with VWD.     

A comparative in vitro evaluation of six von Willebrand factor concentrates

The efficacy of von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates for treatment of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is dependent on their content of VWF and factor VIII (FVIII). STUDY OBJECTIVES: To measure the content and quality of VWF and FVIII in six VWF concentrates: Haemate-P (Aventis Behring), Immunate (Baxter Bioscience), Koate (Bayer Corp.), 8Y (BPL), Innobrand (LFB) and Facteur Willebrand (LFB). METHODS: The VWF antigen content (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), collagen-binding activity (VWF:CB), VWF multimers with electrophoresis and densitometry, FVIII activity and total protein content. RESULTS: Specific activity (VWF:RCo/total protein) varied considerably (4.7-129.5 IU mg(-1)). Activity measures, VWF:RCo and VWF:CB, correlated well, but we found no correlation between any of these and VWF:Ag. The content of high-molecular weight multimer (HMWM) was normal or close to normal in Haemate-P, Innobrand and Facteur Willebrand, moderately reduced in Koate and 8Y, and significantly reduced in Immunate. The HMWM content correlated significantly with the VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio. Only Haemate-P, Innobrand and Facteur Willebrand had VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios >0.7. We found large differences in the content of FVIII and in the FVIII/VWF:RCo ratio. Facteur Willebrand had the lowest (0.02) and Immunate the highest (6.00) ratio. CONCLUSION: Treating physicians must be aware of the large differences between different VWF concentrates and the potential clinical implications. Concentrates lacking HMWM are probably less efficient for mucosal bleedings. FVIII is most important for surgical bleedings, but concentrates with high FVIII/VWF-ratio may induce very high FVIII levels with increased risk of thrombosis. A low FVIII content may be preferable except in case of acute surgery.     

Interim data on long-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of a plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate in 109 patients with severe haemophilia A

The aim of this open-label, multicentre and multinational post-marketing surveillance was to investigate clinical effectiveness, safety and tolerability of a plasma-derived and vWF containing factor VIII product (FVIII/VWF) in patients with severe haemophilia A. Long-term effectiveness, safety and tolerability were investigated in a total of 109 haemophilia A patients treated for prophylaxis or on-demand, as required. Interim data collected until June 2010 are presented. Most patients (99/109; 90.8%) were previously treated patients (PTPs). Mean observation period was 82.6 months. Overall, patients received 105 131 425 IU haemoctin SDH during 68 624 administrations. Each patient was given a mean of 635.4 injections, whereby about half of the administrations were given for treatment of bleeding episodes (46.9%) and the other administrations for prophylactic reasons (53.1%). Patients on prophylaxis had a median of 0.8 bleeding episodes per month. The expected therapeutic effect was reached in 99.3% of treatments. The incidence of clinically relevant inhibitor formation in patients with severe haemophilia (FVIII activity ≤ 1%) was 1.2% for PTPs. One previously untreated patient with severe haemophilia had a clinically relevant transient inhibitor. No treatment related transmissions of hepatitis A, B and C and HIV 1/2 were observed. German patients had a higher extent of exposure and experienced less bleeding episodes than Hungarian patients. In conclusion, haemoctin SDH was effective, safe and well tolerated in long-term prophylaxis and treatment on demand.     

Efficacy and safety of highly purified, doubly virus-inactivated VWF/FVIII concentrates in inherited von Willebrand's disease: results of an Italian cohort study on 120 patients characterized by bleeding severity score

Summary.  The efficacy of highly purified VWF/FVIII concentrates with standardized ristocetin cofactor content (VWF:RCo) has been already proven in patients with von Willebrand's disease (VWD). Aim of this retrospective study is to confirm efficacy and safety of two highly purified, doubly virus-inactivated VWF/FVIII concentrates in a large cohort of patients with VWD who were characterized at enrolment by bleeding severity score. Study drugs Alphanate or Fanhdi were given to 120 cases (51 males, 69 females, median age 50 years, range 6–83 years). Patients had VWD3 (10), VWD2A (19), VWD2B (25), VWD2M (10) and DDAVP-unresponsive VWD1 (56) and a median bleeding severity score of 8 (range 0–27). A total of 114 bleeding episodes in 55 cases and 131 surgical procedures in 85 cases could be analysed. Excellent-good clinical responses were seen in 97% of bleeding episodes and in 99% of surgical procedures. To prevent recurrent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, cerebral (CNS) haemorrhage, haemarthroses, urogenital or multisite bleeding in more severe patients, secondary prophylaxis was also carried out in 15 cases with VWD3 (3), VWD2A (3), VWD2B (2), VWD1 (7). A median dose of 42 IU VWF:RCo kg⁻¹ given every other day or twice a week over a median period of 334 days (range 24–799) prevented bleeding completely in 13 cases and reduced its incidence in the remaining two. These results confirm the efficacy and safety of the study concentrates, not only in the management of bleeding and surgery but also in secondary prophylaxis of severe VWD.     

Successful treatment for patients with von Willebrand disease undergoing urgent surgery using factor VIII/VWF concentrate (Humate-P®)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by insufficient von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. It has been proposed that VWF:ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity may be useful in evaluating the response to VWD treatment in patients who require replacement therapy. This prospective, open-label, non-randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a factor VIII (FVIII)/VWF concentrate (Humate-P) used in treatment regimens based on VWF:RCo activity in subjects with VWD in situations requiring urgent and necessary surgery. This article summarizes the results for 39 subjects with 42 evaluable surgical treatment events, 100% of which were rated as excellent/good for overall efficacy (achievement of haemostasis). The median loading dose based upon VWF:RCo activity was 82.3 international units/kilogram (IU kg(-1); range 32.5-216.8 IU kg(-1)), and the median maintenance dose per infusion was 52.8 IU kg(-1) (range 24.2-196.5 IU kg(-1)) for a median of 3 days (range 1-50 days). The median number of infusions per event was 6 (range 1-67 infusions). Three unanticipated adverse events (peripheral oedema, extremity pain and pseudo-thrombocytopenia) from two surgical treatment events were reported that were potentially treatment-related. No serious drug-related adverse events (AEs) were observed, and no thrombotic events were reported in this study. This study supports the safety and efficacy of the FVIII/VWF concentrate Humate-P for the prevention of surgical haemorrhage in patients with VWD when administered in doses calculated in VWF:RCo units.     

Intravenous DDAVP and factor VIII-von Willebrand factor concentrate for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleedings in patients With von Willebrand disease type 1, 2 and 3.

The current standard set of von Willebrand factor (VWF) parameters used to differentiate type 1 from type 2 VWD include bleeding times (BTs), factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetine cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), VWF collagen binding activity (VWF:CB), ristocetine induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), and analysis of VWF multimers in low and high resolution agarose gels and the response to DDAVP. The BTs and RIPA are normal in asymptomatic carriers of a mutant VWF allele, in dominant type 1, and in recessive type 2N VWD, and this category has a normal response of VWF parameters to DDAVP. The response of FVIII:C is compromised in type 2N VWD. The BTs and RIPA are usually normal in type Vicenza and mild type 2A VWD, and these two VWD variants show a transiently good response of BT and VWF parameters followed by short in vivo half life times of VWF parameters. The BTS are strongly prolonged and RIPA typically absent in recessive severe type 1 and 3 VWD, in dominant type 2A and in recessive type 2C (very likely also 2D) VWD and consequently associated with low or absent platelet VWF, and no or poor response of VWF parameters to DDAVP. The BTs are prolonged and RIPA increased in dominant type 2B VWD, that is featured by normal platelet VWF and a poor response of BT and functional VWF to DDAVP. The BTs are prolonged and RIPA decreased in dominant type 2A and 2U, that all have low VWF platelet, very low VWF:RCo values as compared to VWF:Ag, and a poor response of functional VWF to DDAVP. VWD type 2M is featured by the presence of all VWF multimers in a low resolution agarose gel, normal or slightly prolonged BT, decreased RIPA, a poor response of VWF:RCo and a good response of FVIII and VWF:CB to DDAVP and therefore clearly in between dominant type 1 and 2U. The existing recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment of bleedings in type 2 VWD patients with FVIII/VWF concentrates are mainly derived from pharmocokinetic studies in type 3 VWD patients. FVIII/VWF concentrates should be characterised by labelling with FVIII:C, VWF:RCo, VWF:CB and VWF multimeric pattern to determine their safety and efficacy in prospective management studies. As the bleeding tendency is moderate in type 2 and severe in type 3 VWD and the FVIII:C levels are near normal in type 2 and very low in type 3 VWD patients. Proper recommendations of FVIII/VWF concentrates using VWF:RCo unit dosing for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes are proposed and has to be stratified for the severity of bleeding, the type of surgery either minor or major and for type 2 and type 3 VWD as well.     

Bleeding symptoms and laboratory correlation in patients with severe von Willebrand disease

Summary.  Type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a rare bleeding disorder with markedly decreased or absent von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein, accompanied by a parallel decrease in VWF function and factor VIII (FVIII) activity. The goal of this study was to describe the population of patients enrolled in the USA Centers for Disease Control Universal Data Collection (UDC) study with type 3 VWD, defined as a VWF:Ag of <10%, and to correlate bleeding symptoms with VWF and FVIII levels. Data on 150 patients were analysed. Almost all patients experienced bleeding episodes (98%) and required blood and/or factor product treatment (92%). While oral mucosal bleeding (the site of first bleed in 54%) was most common, subsequent muscle and joint bleeds were also seen (28%, 45%, respectively), and intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 8% of individuals. Mean age of first bleed was lower in those with either a FVIII ≤5% or a VWF:Ag <1%. Univariate marginal model analysis showed lower levels of FVIII and VWF:Ag both predicted a higher risk of joint bleeding. Longitudinal multivariate analysis found a lower FVIII level ( P  = 0.03), increasing age ( P  < 0.0001), history of joint bleeding ( P  = 0.001), higher body mass index (BMI) ( P  < 0.0001), and use of home infusion ( P  = 0.02) were all negatively associated with joint mobility. Low levels of VWF:Ag ( P  = 0.003) and male sex ( P  = 0.007) were also negatively associated with joint function. This study documents the strong bleeding phenotype in severe VWD and provides data to help target therapy, including prophylaxis, for patients most at risk of bleeding complications.     

Efficacy and safety of Wilate in paediatric VWD patients under 6 years of age – results of a prospective multicentre clinical study including recovery information

Treatment with exogenous von Willebrand factor (VWF) is indicated in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) in whom treatment with 1‐deamino‐8‐d ‐arginine vasopressin/desmopressin is contraindicated. Wilate^® is a new generation plasma‐derived concentrate of native VWF and coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) (in a physiological 1:1 ratio) developed for the treatment of VWD. This is the first study to report safety, efficacy and in vivo recovery (IVR) data from 15 paediatric patients less than 6 years of age who received Wilate^® for either prophylaxis, on‐demand treatment or for treatment in surgical procedures during a prospective open‐label trial (VWD type 1: 5, type 2A: 1, type 2B: 2, type 3: 6, unknown type: 1 patients). Analysis of IVR for VWF and FVIII suggested an appropriate and consistent rise in coagulation activity after Wilate^® administration. Overall efficacy was rated as excellent or good for 99.7% [prophylactic infusions] and 100% [bleeding episodes/surgical procedures]. More than 82% of bleeding episodes resolved after 1 day of treatment, and a Wilate^® dosage of 20–50 IU kg^?1 was sufficient to achieve haemostasis in 97% of bleeding episodes. All surgical procedures were successfully managed with Wilate^®. No thromboembolic events were observed during the study, and no patient developed anti‐VWF antibodies or FVIII inhibitors. In conclusion, this study confirms both the expected IVR profile in paediatric patients and the excellent efficacy, tolerability and safety profile of Wilate^® observed previously in adults. Wilate^® showed excellent efficacy in the treatment of bleeding when used prophylactically or on‐demand, and in the treatment of surgical procedures.     

Clinical efficacy in bleeding and surgery in von Willebrand patients treated with Fanhdi® a highly purified,doubly inactivated FVIII/VWF concentrate

Summary. Therapy with factor VIII/von Willebrand factor (FVIII/VWF) concentrate is the mainstay therapy in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) unresponsive to desmopressin. There are several commercially available FVIII/VWF concentrates that have been tested in VWD patients. We retrospectively analized the clinical efficacy in bleeding episodes and surgery of a highly purified FVIII/VWF complex with two inactivation steps (Fanhdi^®) in VWD patients. Sixty patients were included in the study. Treatment schedule consisted of one or more doses (standard dose 40 IU/kg body weight of FVIII) of Fanhdi^®. One hundred and fifty bleeding episodes were treated. These were: 28 serious bleedings; 92 moderate and 30 mild. An excellent clinical efficacy in almost 95% of cases was observed. Fanhdi^® was administered during 66 surgical procedures (38 major and 28 minor) with an overall efficacy of 98%. Fanhdi^® a highly purified, doubly virus‐inactivated FVIII/VWF concentrate, with a high content of active VWF and an excellent record of clinical safety, is a valid choice in treating VWD.     

Results from a large multinational clinical trial (guardian™1) using prophylactic treatment with turoctocog alfa in adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A: safety and efficacy

Recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products provide a safe and efficacious replacement therapy for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with severe haemophilia A. This multinational, open‐label, non‐controlled trial investigated the safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa, a new rFVIII product. The primary objective was to evaluate safety. A total of 150 patients (24 adolescents and 126 adults) with severe haemophilia A (FVIII activity ≤1%), with at least 150 exposure days (EDs) to any FVIII product and no history of inhibitors were enrolled, and 146 patients (97%) completed the trial. All patients received prophylaxis with turoctocog alfa for approximately 6 months and had a mean of 85 EDs during the trial. None of the patients developed FVIII inhibitors, there were no indications of early FVIII inhibitor development and no safety concerns were identified. A total of 225 adverse events were reported in 100 (67%) patients, with the most common being events associated with dosing procedures, headaches, and nasopharyngitis. A total of 499 bleeding episodes were reported during the trial, the majority (89%) were controlled with 1–2 infusions of turoctocog alfa. Based on patient reports, the success rate (defined as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ haemostatic response) for treatment of bleeding episodes was 81%. The overall median annualized bleeding rate was 3.7 (interquartile range: 8.7) bleeds/patient/year. In conclusion, turoctocog alfa provides a new, safe and effective alternative for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A.     

Pregnancy and delivery in women with von Willebrand disease

Given the wide heterogeneity of phenotypes and of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms associated with the disorder, pregnancy and delivery in von Willebrand disease (VWD) represent a significant clinical challenge. The variable pattern of changes observed during pregnancy of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII), the protein carried by VWF, prompts a careful evaluation of pregnant women with VWD to plan the most appropriate treatment at the time of parturition. However, there are also instances during pregnancy (amniocentesis, vaginal bleeding associated with placental detachment, sudden abortion) that may require urgent hemostatic treatment to prevent bleeding. Thus, women with VWD should start pregnancy after being well characterised as to their type, subtype and treatments. Women with VWD who have VWF and FVIII basal levels >30 U/dL typically normalise these levels at the end of pregnancy and specific anti‐haemorrhagic prophylaxis is seldom required. On the contrary, those with basal levels <20 U/dL usually show a lesser increase and specific treatment is required. Some women with DNA variants associated with increased clearance can be treated with desmopressin, while those unresponsive or with contra‐indications to this agent need replacement therapy. For these latter women, the risk of vaginal bleeding during pregnancy may be increased and prophylaxis with VWF concentrates required. Similarly, women with type 2 VWD who maintain reduced VWF activity throughout pregnancy require replacement therapy with FVIII/VWF concentrates. Delayed postpartum bleeding may occur when replacement therapy is not continued for some days. Tranexamic acid is useful at discharge to avoid excessive lochia.     

The role of plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrates in the treatment of hemophilia A patients

Besides preventing bleeding episodes, common goals of the treatment of hemophilia include integrating of patients into a normal social life and optimizing their quality of life. Sufficient amounts of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, whether recombinant or plasma-derived, are continuously needed. Guidelines for quality assurance of treatment will be a cornerstone to maintain optimal clinical management of patients especially considering financial aspects. Advances in manufacturing technologies have made possible general availability of modern concentrates for the management of hemophilia A patients. Safety, cost and continuous supply of concentrates must be considered when deciding on a product for replacement therapy. As todays' products have reached an excellent margin of safety with regard to virus transmission, the development and treatment of inhibitors is currently the main concern for physicians and patients. The incidence of inhibitors is influenced by various patient-related factors such as mutation type or severity of the disease. Plasma-derived FVIII concentrates containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) may have clinical advantages over pure FVIII concentrates with regard to inhibitor development and inhibitor eradication. Clinical trials comparing FVIII/VWF concentrates with pure FVIII concentrates are lacking, thus a lower inhibitor incidence has not yet been proven. Data from Germany on immune tolerance induction with FVIII/VWF concentrates indicate higher success rates with these than with pure FVIII concentrates. In addition FVIII/VWF concentrates are the therapy of choice when immune tolerance therapy with pure FVIII products is not successful.     

Understanding FVIII/VWF complex--report from a symposium of XXIX WFH meeting 2010

Summary. von Willebrand factor (VWF) has the capacity to form a complex with factor VIII (FVIII) which may modulate the immunogenicity of FVIII. It has been proposed that a significant fraction of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) is unable to bind VWF. In an experimental model studied at the McMaster University in Canada, this VWF‐unbound rFVIII fraction showed no coagulant function. Sulphation of FVIII tyrosine (Tyr) 1680 has been reported as essential for the interaction with VWF. In a study performed at the Grifols and CNS‐CSIC in Spain, Tyr1680 sulphation was observed to be incomplete in rFVIII and complete in plasma‐derived FVIII (pdFVIII). This could explain the incapability of some rFVIII molecules to bind VWF. Experience with immune tolerance induction (ITI) at the Bonn Haemophilia Centre indicates that only eradication of FVIII inhibitors allows safe haemostasis control and the option of prophylactic treatment. Various clinical trials were planned to evaluate the clinical role VWF‐containing FVIII concentrates (FVIII/VWF). RES.I.ST (an acronym for REScue Immunotolerance STudy) is an international, prospective study aimed at assessing whether FVIII/VWF can induce ITI in high‐risk haemophilia patients (RES.I.ST naïve) and whether patients who previously failed ITI with FVIII alone can be rescued with FVIII/VWF (RES.I.ST experienced). Enrolment started in November 2009. In the FAIReSt.Will (Fanhdi and Alphanate Italian Retrospective Study in Willebrand disease) study, 120 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients treated with Fanhdi^® or Alphanate^® were retrospectively analysed. Efficacy was excellent and no side effects were reported. The ongoing PRO.Will study is a prospective, multicenter trial aimed at assessing the efficacy, safety and pharmacoeconomics of secondary long‐term prophylaxis in patients with severe inherited VWD.     

Evidence-based recommendations on the treatment of von Willebrand disease in Italy

Background

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common hereditary bleeding disorder affecting both males and females. It arises from quantitative or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and causes bleeding of mucous membranes and soft tissues. The aim of treatment is to correct the dual defect of haemostasis caused by the abnormal/reduced VWF and the concomitant deficiency of factor VIII (FVIII).

Material and methods

This document contains evidence-based recommendations for the management of VWD compiled by AICE (the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres). All the evidence supporting these recommendations are based on non-randomised comparative studies or case series, because randomised controlled clinical trials or meta-analyses are not available for this disease.

Results and conclusions

Desmopressin (DDAVP) is the treatment of choice for patients with type 1 VWD with FVIII and VWF levels of 10 U/dL or more, while VWF/FVIII concentrates are indicated for those who are unresponsive or insufficiently responsive to DDAVP (severe type 1, type 2 and 3 VWD). VWF concentrates devoid of FVIII, not yet licensed in Italy, may be considered for short-term prophylaxis in elective surgery or for long-term secondary prophylaxis.     

von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrate (Humate‐P) for management of elective surgery in adults and children with von Willebrand disease

Summary. von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Treatment guidelines recommend the use of von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrate for VWD patients with type 2 or 3 VWD undergoing surgery, and type 1 patients undergoing surgery who are unresponsive, or for whom desmopressin acetate is contraindicated. This prospective, open‐label, multinational study evaluated the safety, efficacy and optimal dosing of a VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate‐P) in subjects with VWD undergoing elective surgery. Dosing was based on VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) and FVIII pharmacokinetic assessments performed before surgery. Pharmacokinetic assessments were completed in 33 adults and 9 children. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed on a 4‐point scale (excellent, good, moderate/poor or none). Overall effective haemostasis was achieved in 32/35 subjects. Median terminal VWF:RCo half‐life was 11.7 h, and median incremental in vivo recovery was 2.4 IU dL^?1 per IU kg^?1 infused. Major haemorrhage occurred after surgery in 3/35 cases despite achieving target VWF and FVIII levels. Median VWF/FVIII concentrate loading doses ranged from 42.6 IU VWF:RCo kg^?1 (oral surgery) to 61.2 IU VWF:RCo kg^?1 (major surgery), with a median of 10 (range, 2–55) doses administered per subject. Adverse events considered possibly treatment‐related (n = 6) were generally mild and of short duration. The results indicate that this VWF/FVIII concentrate is safe and effective in the prevention of excessive bleeding during and after surgery in individuals with VWD.     

Treatment of von Willebrand disease

The bleeding tendency in von Willebrand disease (VWD) is heterogeneous and some patients with the mildest form of the disease have no significant bleeding symptoms throughout their lives. In some cases, the most difficult task for a clinician is to decide whether any treatment is actually required. However, cases with moderate to severe factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF) deficiency usually require treatment to stop or prevent bleeding. Increasing autologous FVIII/VWF by desmopressin administration or providing normal allogeneic VWF through the infusion of plasma-derived concentrates can correct FVIII and VWF deficiencies and normalize or shorten bleeding time (BT). FVIII levels are the best predictors of soft tissue or surgical bleeding, while BT normalization, reflecting the correction of platelet-dependent functions of VWF, is considered a reliable indicator of an effective treatment of mucosal bleeding. Recombinant concentrates of FVIII are not indicated (apart from cases with alloantibodies against exogenous VWF), since they are devoid of VWF and lack its stabilizing effect on circulating FVIII. A very-high-purity concentrate of VWF has recently been made available, but its advantages over conventional concentrates containing both FVIII and VWF moieties are not obvious. The best way to select the appropriate treatment is to perform a test infusion with desmopressin in any patient with clinically significant VWD, provided that he/she has no contraindication to the compound or belongs to subtype with an anticipated lack of response (for example, type 3 VWD with FVIII/VWF lower than 5%).     

Treatment of von Willebrand disease with a high-purity factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate: a prospective, multicenter study.

Among patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) who are unresponsive to desmopressin therapy, replacement with plasma-derived concentrates is the treatment of choice. Because prospective studies are lacking, such treatment has been largely empirical. A multicenter, prospective study has been conducted in 81 patients with VWD (15 patients with type 1, 34 with type 2, and 32 with type 3 disease) to investigate the efficacy of a high-purity factor VIII/von Willebrand factor (FVIII/VWF) concentrate for treatment of bleeding and surgical prophylaxis. Two preparations of the concentrate-one virally inactivated with solvent detergent, the other with an additional heat-treatment step--were evaluated. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for both preparations. Using pre-established dosages based on the results of pharmacokinetic studies, 53 patients were administered either preparation for the treatment of 87 bleeding episodes, and 39 patients were treated prophylactically for 71 surgical or invasive procedures. Sixty-five (74.7%) and 10 (11.5%) of the bleeding episodes were controlled with 1 or 2 infusions, respectively. Patients with severe type 3 VWD typically required more infusions and higher doses, at shorter time intervals, than did patients with generally milder types 1 and 2. Among patients undergoing surgical procedures, blood loss was lower than that predicted prospectively, and losses exceeding the predicted value did not correlate with the postinfusion skin bleeding time. In conclusion, the concentrate effectively stopped active bleeding and provided adequate hemostasis for surgical or invasive procedures, even in the absence of bleeding time correction.     

The use of desmopressin in von Willebrand disease: the experience of the first 30 years (1977–2007)

Summary.  The aim of the treatment for von Willebrand disease (VWD) is to correct the dual defect of haemostasis, i.e. the abnormal platelet adhesion as a result of reduced and/or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) and the abnormal coagulation expressed by low levels of factor VIII (FVIII). Correction of both deficiencies can be achieved by administering the synthetic peptide desmopressin (DDAVP) or, in cases unresponsive to this agent, the plasma concentrates containing VWF and FVIII (VWF/FVIII). DDAVP is the treatment of choice for type 1 VWD because it can induce release of normal VWF from cellular compartments, but the drug can be clinically useful also in other VWD types, including acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). A test dose of DDAVP at the time of diagnosis is recommended to establish the individual patterns of biological response and to predict clinical efficacy during bleeding and surgery. DDAVP is not effective in VWD type 3 and in severe forms of VWD 1 and 2. It can induce transient thrombocytopenia in patients with VWD type 2B. The results of several retrospective studies on the use of DDAVP in VWD management have been reported by many authors in different countries for the last 30 years. However, despite the widespread use of DDAVP in the treatment of VWD, there are only a few prospective clinical trials in a large number of cases on DDAVP efficacy and safety aimed at determining benefits and limits of this therapeutic approach. An investigator-driven observational prospective study on clinical efficacy of DDAVP in 200 patients with VWD types 1 and 2 has been recently organized: the effectiveness and safety of DDAVP will be evaluated prospectively for 24 months during bleeding episodes and minor or major surgeries in the VWD patients who were exposed to an infusion trial at enrollment.     

Management of inherited von Willebrand disease in 2006

The aim of treatment of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is to correct the dual defect of hemostasis (i.e., the abnormal platelet adhesion due to reduced and/or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor [VWF] and the abnormal coagulation expressed by low levels of factor [F] VIII). Desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) is the treatment of choice for type 1 VWD because it can induce release of normal VWF from cellular compartments. Prospective studies on biological response versus clinical efficacy of DDAVP in VWD types 1 and 2 are in progress to explore its benefits and limits as a therapeutic option. In type 3 and in severe forms of type 1 and 2 VWD, DDAVP is not effective, and for these patients plasma virally inactivated concentrates containing VWF and FVIII are the mainstay of treatment. Several intermediate- and high-purity VWF/FVIII concentrates are available and have been shown to be effective in clinical practice (bleeding and surgery). New VWF products almost devoid of FVIII are now under evaluation in clinical practice. Although thrombotic events are rare in VWD patients receiving repeated infusions of concentrates, there is some concern that sustained high FVIII levels may increase risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism. Dosage and timing of VWF/FVIII administrations should be planned to keep the FVIII level between 50 and 150 IU/dL. Appropriate dosage and timing in repeated infusions are also very important in patients exposed to secondary long-term prophylaxis for recurrent bleedings.