伊托必利联合兰索拉唑治疗功能性消化不良的临床疗效分析

目的:观察伊托必利联合兰索拉唑治疗功能性消化不良的临床疗效.方法:将106例功能性消化不良患者随机平均分为治疗组和对照组,两组均服用伊托必利片50mg,3次/d,治疗组加服兰索拉唑片30mg,1次/d,疗程4周.结果:治疗组的总有效率显著高于对照组,两组临床疗效相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:伊托必利联合兰索拉唑治疗功能性消化不良能显著改善临床症状,疗效确切,不良反应少.     

伊托必利联合铝碳酸镁、兰索拉唑治疗胆汁反流性胃炎的疗效观察

目的:分析伊托必利联合铝碳酸镁、兰索拉唑治疗胆汁反流性胃炎的疗效。方法:将64例胆汁反流性胃炎患者随机分成治疗组和对照组,每组各32例。治疗组采用伊托必利50 mg,餐前口服,3次/d;铝碳酸镁1.0 g,饭后2 h咀嚼口服,3次/d;兰索拉唑30 mg,晨空腹口服,1次/d。对照组采用伊托必利联合铝碳酸镁,服法同治疗组。2组疗程均为4周。结果:治疗组和对照组总有效率分别为93.75%和84.38%;2组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:伊托必利联合铝碳酸镁、兰索拉唑治疗胆汁反流性胃炎疗效显著,值得临床推广。     

盐酸伊托必利与多潘立酮片联合治疗功能性消化不良效果观察

目的观察伊托必利与多潘立酮片联合治疗功能性消化不良的效果。方法将116例功能性消化不良患者,随机分成治疗组(盐酸伊托必利+多潘立酮片)62例和对照组(盐酸伊托必利)54例。治疗组每次口服盐酸伊托必利片50mg+多潘立酮片10mg,每日3次,餐前30min服用;对照组口服多潘立酮片10mg,每日3次,两组均连续用药1个月,观察有效率和不良反应发生率。结果治疗1个月后,治疗组的有效率显著高于对照组(P<0.05),而3个月后的复发率显著低于对照组(P<0.05),两组的不良反应发生率和实验室检查无显著性差异。结论盐酸伊托必利与多潘立酮片联合治疗功能性消化不良的效果优于单用多潘立酮片。     

甲硝唑、阿莫西林和兰索拉唑联合治疗HP阳性消化性溃疡78例疗效观察

目的探讨甲硝唑、阿莫西林和兰索拉唑联合治疗HP阳性消化性溃疡的临床效果。方法选择本院2010年9月至2012年9月消化性溃疡患者共78例,上述患者随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组给予甲硝唑400 mg口服,2次/d;阿莫西林口服每次1000 mg,2次/d;兰索拉唑口服,每次30 mg,早餐前和晚餐前各服1次,2次/d。对照组患者给予雷尼替丁口服,每次150 mg,早餐前和晚餐前分别服用1次,同时服用甲硝唑和阿莫西林,用法和剂量同观察组。两组患者均连续治疗4周。评定两组治疗效果。结果观察组总有效率为94.8%,对照组总有效率为74.2%,观察组总有效率高于对照组（P〈0.05）。结论甲硝唑、阿莫西林和兰索拉唑联合治疗能够显著改善消化性溃疡临床症状,根除幽门螺杆菌效果显著,值得临床推广。     

联合抗抑郁药治疗功能性消化不良临床体会

目的：比较依托必利联合帕罗西汀与单纯依托必利治疗功能性消化不良（FD）的疗效。方法：将124例患者随机分为治疗组64例,对照组60例,治疗组用依托必利50 mg 3次/d,餐前30 min口服,帕罗西汀20 mg 1次/d晨服。对照组用依托必利50 mg 3次/d口服。两组均以4周为1疗程。结果：治疗组总有效率93.75%,对照组总有效率70.00%,两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：依托必利联合帕罗西汀治疗FD较单用依托必利治疗疗效高,值得临床推广。     

国产兰索拉唑联合依托必利治疗反流性食管炎的临床观察

目的:观察国产兰索拉唑联合盐酸依托必利治疗反流性食管炎的临床疗效。方法:将110例反流性食管炎患者随机分为3组:A组40例,给予国产兰索拉唑30 mg,早、晚餐前各1次+依托必利50 mg,三餐前各1次;B组35例,国产兰索拉唑30 mg,早、晚餐前各1次;C组35例,依托必利50 mg,三餐前各1次。3组疗程均为6周,疗程结束后通过症状积分、胃镜检查结果和病理检查结果评定疗效。结果:治疗后,A组、B组和C组的总有效率分别为90.0%、71.4%和60.0%,A组与B组和C组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组与C组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后经胃镜检查结果比较,A组、B组和C组的总有效率分别为88.4%、68.6%和57.1%,A组与B组和C组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组与C组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3组患者均未见明显不良反应。结论:国产兰索拉唑和盐酸依托必利联合治疗反流性食管炎疗效较好,且不良反应少。     

多潘立酮联合兰索拉唑治疗功能性消化不良182例临床观察

目的 对多潘立酮联合兰索拉唑治疗功能性消化不良进行临床疗效观察.方法 将182例功能性消化不良的就诊患者,分成治疗组和对照组两组,治疗组92例与对照组90例.治疗组口服给药多潘立酮片+兰索拉唑片进行治疗.对照组单纯口服多潘立酮片进行治疗.结果 治疗组与对照组临床疗效差异很大,治疗组的有效率显著高于对照组(p＜0.05),复发率也明显低于对照组(P＜0.05).不良反应发生率和实验室检查,两组比较差异无显著性差异(P＞0.05).结论 单独使用多潘立酮片,比联合使用兰索拉唑片治疗功能性消化不良效果有明显的劣势差异.     

兰索拉唑联合克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗消化性溃疡临床疗效观察

目的观察兰索拉唑联合克拉霉素及阿莫西林治疗消化性溃疡的临床疗效。方法2006年3月-2007年9月我院收治的消化性溃疡患者86例,随机分为2组,联合用药组44例,对照组42例。两组均口服兰索拉唑30 mg,每日晨吞服。联合用药组加用克拉霉素0.25 g/次,2次/d,阿莫西林0.5 g/次,3次/d,疗程14 d。两组均治疗1个月,观察两组临床疗效。结果联合用药组溃疡痊愈率为93%,HP清除率为82%;对照组分别为66.7%,24%。两组比较,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论兰索拉唑联合克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗消化性溃疡临床疗效显著。     

兰索拉唑联合胶体果胶铋、阿莫西林治疗消化性溃疡的疗效观察

目的观察兰索拉唑联合胶体果胶铋、阿莫西林治疗消化性溃疡(PU)的临床疗效。方法将84例PU患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各42例,观察组先给予兰索拉唑30mg,1次/d,胶体果胶铋150mg+阿莫西林1000mg,2次/d,7d后单独给予兰索拉唑30mg,1次/d,连续3周;对照组先给予奥美拉唑20mg+胶体果胶铋150mg+阿莫西林1000mg,2次/d,7d后单独给予奥美拉唑20mg,1次/d,连续3周。结果观察组临床总有效率为95.24%,对照组临床总有效率为76.19%,两组间差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论兰索拉唑联合胶体果胶铋、阿莫西林治疗PU疗效确切,值得在临床上推广应用。     

兰索拉唑三联疗法治疗十二指肠溃疡的疗效观察

目的观察兰索拉唑三联疗法治疗十二指肠球部溃疡的疗效及安全性。方法将67例十二指肠球部溃疡患者,随机分成治疗组和对照组。治疗采用兰索拉唑、阿莫西林、甲硝唑治疗1周,之后再服用兰索拉唑1周。对照组采用雷尼替丁、阿莫西林、甲硝唑连续口服2周。对两组患者疗效、不良反应进行评估。结果治疗组愈合率、有效率、幽门螺杆菌消除率均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组未发现明显不良反应。结论兰索拉唑三联疗法治疗十二指肠球部溃疡疗效好,安全可靠。     

Helicobacter pylori eradication is beneficial in the treatment of functional dyspepsia

AIM: To assess whether the eradication of Helicobacter pylori leads to long-term relief of symptoms in functional dyspepsia. METHODS: Eight hundred patients with functional dyspepsia were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with twice-daily 30 mg lansoprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin for 7 days (L30AC), twice-daily 15 mg lansoprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin for 7 days (L15AC), or once-daily 15 mg lansoprazole for 14 days (LP). Dyspepsia and reflux symptoms were monitored for 12 months. RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, the non-ulcer dyspepsia sum score showed a statistically significant benefit in terms of symptom relief in the L30AC group (P = 0.0068) compared with the LP group, but there was no significant difference between the L15AC and LP groups (P = 0.2). When all patients in the two eradication therapy arms were considered together, successful eradication had a significant benefit with regard to the complete absence of symptoms (P < 0.04). H. pylori eradication did not lead to an increase in reflux symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that H. pylori infection causes dyspeptic symptoms in a subset of patients with functional dyspepsia, and that these patients may obtain long-term symptomatic benefit following H. pylori eradication.     

Low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole vs. full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy and tolerability of two 1-week triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (LCM group), or lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily (LCA group). H. pylori status was assessed by rapid urease test, histology and 13C-urea breath test before and after therapy. RESULTS: At 3 months, H. pylori eradication (intention- to-treat/per protocol analysis) was 92.4%/93.8% in the LCM group and 83.1%/85.7% in the LCA group (P=N.S.). Side-effects were more frequently reported in the LCA group (37.9%) than in the LCM group (19.7%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this open, randomized controlled trial, eradication of H. pylori by low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole was higher with significantly less side-effects than by full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. This finding may be related to the stronger synergism of clarithromycin plus metronidazole, even at lower doses, than of clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. Considering the lower cost as well, LCM should be preferred to LCA in the eradication of H. pylori.     

Lansoprazole: an update of its place in the management of acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion and also exhibits antibacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori in vitro. Current therapy for peptic ulcer disease focuses on the eradication of H. pylori infection with maintenance therapy indicated in those patients who are not cured of H. pylori and those with ulcers resistant to healing. Lansoprazole 30 mg combined with amoxicillin 1g, clarithromycin 250 or 500mg, or metronidazole 400 mg twice daily was associated with eradication rates ranging from 71 to 94%, and ulcer healing rates were generally >80% in well designed studies. In addition, it was as effective as omeprazole- or rabeprazole-based regimens which included these antimicrobial agents. Maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg/day was significantly more effective than either placebo or ranitidine in preventing ulcer relapse. Importantly, preliminary data suggest that lansoprazole-based eradication therapy is effective in children and the elderly. In the short-term treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), lansoprazole 15, 30 or 60 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, ranitidine 300 mg/day or cisapride 40 mg/day and similar in efficacy to pantoprazole 40 mg/day in terms of healing of oesophagitis. Lansoprazole 30 mg/day, omeprazole 20 mg/day and pantoprazole 40 mg/day all provided similar symptom relief in these patients. In patients with healed oesophagitis. 12-month maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg/day prevented recurrence and was similar to or more effective than omeprazole 10 or 20 mg/day. Available data in patients with NSAID-related disorders or acid-related dyspepsia suggest that lansoprazole is effective in these patients in terms of the prevention of NSAID-related gastrointestinal complications, ulcer healing and symptom relief. Meta-analytic data and postmarketing surveillance in >30,000 patients indicate that lansoprazole is well tolerated both as monotherapy and in combination with antimicrobial agents. After lansoprazole monotherapy commonly reported adverse events included dose-dependent diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, headache and abdominal pain. After short-term treatment in patients with peptic ulcer, GORD, dyspepsia and gastritis the incidence of adverse events associated with lansoprazole was generally < or = 5%. Similar adverse events were seen in long-term trials, although the incidence was generally higher (< or = 10%). When lansoprazole was administered in combination with amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole adverse events included diarrhoea, headache and taste disturbance. In conclusion, lansoprazole-based triple therapy is an effective treatment option for the eradication of H. pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Preliminary data suggest it may have an important role in the management of this infection in children and the elderly. In the short-term management of GORD, lansoprazole monotherapy offers a more effective alternative to histamine H2-receptor antagonists and initial data indicate that it is an effective short-term treatment option in children and adolescents. In adults lansoprazole maintenance therapy is also an established treatment option for the long-term management of this chronic disease. Lansoprazole has a role in the treatment and prevention of NSAID-related ulcers and the treatment of acid-related dyspepsia; however, further studies are needed to confirm its place in these indications. Lansoprazole has emerged as a useful and well tolerated treatment option in the management of acid-related disorders.     

复方阿嗪米特联合多潘立酮治疗功能性消化不良的疗效观察

目的观察复方阿嗪米特联合多潘立酮治疗功能性消化不良的疗效。方法选择2010年2月—2012年3月我院门诊120例符合罗马Ⅲ功能性消化不良诊断标准患者按随机数字法分为两组,每组各60例。对照组给予多潘立酮（10mg,3次/d,餐前30min口服）;治疗组在对照组基础上联合复方阿嗪米特肠溶片（2片,3次/d,餐后服）治疗,治疗前及治疗4周后填写治疗效果表格及不良反应表格。结果实验组除上腹烧灼感外,上腹痛、餐后饱胀不适、早饱感改善较明显,临床症状积分及总有效率与对照组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论复方阿嗪米特联合多潘立酮较单用多潘立酮可明显提高治疗功能性消化不良疗效,不良反应少。     

蒲元和胃胶囊联合多潘立酮治疗功能性消化不良的疗效观察

目的观察蒲元和胃胶囊联合多潘立酮治疗功能性消化不良的疗效和安全性。方法将2010年1月——2011年9月82例功能性消化不良患者随机分为试验组(41例)和对照组(41例),两组均口服多潘立酮,3餐饭前30min服用10mg;试验组加服蒲元和胃胶囊,进餐后30min服用4粒。4周后观察疗效。结果试验组临床症状改善情况明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论蒲元和胃胶囊联合多潘立酮治疗功能性消化不良安全有效,其疗效明显优于单用促动力药多潘立酮。     

莫沙必利联合复方阿嗪米特肠溶片治疗功能性消化不良临床观察

目的观察莫沙必利与复方阿嗪米特联合使用对功能性消化不良症状的临床疗效。方法将212例门诊就诊的功能性消化不良患者纳入本研究,将其随机分为治疗组和对照组各106例。治疗组106例,口服盐酸莫沙必利5mg/次,每日3次,加复方阿嗪米特肠溶片2片/次,每日3次,餐前30min服用。对照组106例,口服莫沙必利5mg/次,每日3次,餐前30min服用。疗程均为4周,治疗期间每周复诊1次,采用临床症状积分法观察各组患者食欲不振、腹胀、腹痛、嗳气、恶心、腹泻、便秘等症状改善程度。结果治疗4周后两组患者食欲不振、腹胀、腹痛、嗳气、恶心、腹泻、便秘等常见的临床症状积分均低于治疗前,治疗组临床症状积分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;治疗组显效率、总有效率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。治疗过程中各组未观察到严重的药物相关性不良反应。结论莫沙必利联合复方阿嗪米特肠溶片治疗功能性消化不良的临床疗效肯定,明显优于单独使用莫沙必利。     

氟哌噻吨美利曲辛片联合莫沙比利治疗功能性消化不良58例的疗效观察

目的：探讨氟哌噻吨美利曲辛片联合莫沙比利治疗功能性消化不良（FD）的临床效果。方法：选择2009年10月~2010年10月在消化内科治疗的116例功能性消化不良患者,并随机分为对照组和观察组,每组58例。对照组采用口服莫沙比利5mg,3次/d,质子泵抑制剂奥美拉唑20mg,2次/d;观察组则在对照组治疗的基础上加用抗抑郁药氟哌噻吨美利曲辛片10.5mg,1次/d。两组治疗时间均为4周。结果：观察组总有效率为93.10%,对照组总有效率为63.79%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：氟哌噻吨美利曲辛片联合莫沙比利治疗功能性消化不良疗效显著,不良反应少,是目前治疗功能性消化不良的可行方案。     

乳果糖联合双歧杆菌四联活菌治疗功能性消化不良的疗效及其对肠道菌群的影响

目的 观察乳果糖联合双歧杆菌四联活菌通过调节肠道菌群治疗功能性消化不良的临床疗效.方法 功能性消化不良患者194例,随机分为A组(给予莫沙必利5mg 口服,每日3次)49例,B组(给予乳果糖10～30mL 口服,每日3次)49例、C组(给予双歧杆菌四联活菌片1.5 g 口服,每日3次)48例,D组(给予乳果糖10～30...     

多潘立酮联合香砂六君丸治疗功能性消化不良的临床观察

目的:观察多潘立酮联合香砂六君丸治疗功能性消化不良(FD)的临床疗效和安全性。方法:将106例FD的住院患者采用抽签方式随机均分为研究组和对照组。研究组患者口服多潘立酮片10 mg/次,tid,并口服香砂六君丸6 g/次,tid;对照组患者仅口服多潘立酮片10 mg/次,tid。两组患者均治疗4周。观察两组患者治疗前后的临床症状评分、总积分、临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗后,两组患者食欲不振、上腹不适、腹胀、餐后早饱、恶心呕吐、嗳气等临床症状评分均较治疗前显著下降,且研究组患者除上腹不适外,其他症状评分显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),研究组患者临床症状总积分下降值和下降比例显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组患者总有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者均未见明显不良反应发生。结论:多潘立酮联合香砂六君丸治疗FD的疗效显著优于单用多潘立酮,且安全性较好。     

曲唑酮联合心理疏导治疗功能性消化不良50例

目的 观察曲唑酮联合心理疏导治疗功能性消化不良的疗效.方法 将100例确诊为功能性消化不良的患者分为心理治疗组和对照组各50例,两组均给予雷尼替丁胶囊1粒、1日2次,多潘立酮片10mg、1日3次,均饭前口服.心理治疗组加用心理疏导和曲唑酮50mg,1日2次,早、晚饭后口服,疗程4周.结果 心理治疗组与对照组治疗1,2,4周后总有效率分别为68.33%,85.00%,95.00%和41.67%,51.67%,58.33%,两组疗效差异非常显著(P<0.01).治疗4周后心理治疗组上腹胀痛、上腹烧灼和上腹不适、早饱、嗳气等症状改善积分总有效率分别为94%,93%,93%,明显高于对照组的56%,56%,55%(P<0.01).结论 心理疏导和抗抑郁药对伴有焦虑和抑郁症状的功能性消化不良患者治疗效果十分显著,值得临床医师重视和推广.