Effects of repetition rate of bone-conducted vibration on ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials

Objective

This study applied bone-conducted vibration (BCV) stimuli at various repetition rates to investigate the effects of repetition rate on both ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs and cVEMPs).

Methods

Twenty-five healthy subjects underwent oVEMP tests in BCV mode at repetition rates of 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 Hz. The optimal repetition rates (5, 10 and 20 Hz) for oVEMPs were also adopted to elicit cVEMPs, and 20 Hz stimuli were further evaluated in pathological ears.

Results

At repetition rates of 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 Hz, the prevalence of clear oVEMPs were 100% in groups of 5, 10 and 20 Hz, with no significant differences in the mean nI latency, but the mean nI–pI amplitude of the 20 Hz group showed significantly larger. For the BCV–cVEMPs, 5, 10 and 20 Hz stimuli yielded similar information. Clinically, the BCV mode at 20 Hz stimuli was also appropriate for evaluating VEMPs in ears of vestibular schwannoma.

Conclusions

The BCV mode at a repetition rate of 20 Hz is recommended for the mass detection of VEMPs.

Significance

Eliciting VEMPs in BCV mode using 20 Hz stimuli takes a short time and may trigger a high prevalence with large amplitude.     

The n10 component of the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) is distinct from the R1 component of the blink reflex

ObjectiveBone-conducted vibration (BCV) in the midline at the hairline (Fz), results in short latency potentials recorded by surface electrodes beneath the eyes – the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP). The early negative component of the oVEMP, n10, is due to vestibular stimulation, however it is similar to the early R1 component of the blink reflex. Here we seek to dissociate n10 from R1.MethodsSurface potentials were recorded from the infraorbital electromyogram of 10 healthy subjects, 6 patients with bilateral vestibular loss, 2 with unilateral vestibular loss, 4 with facial palsy and 3 with facial and vestibular nerve lesions on the same side. BCV was delivered at Fz, the inion, the glabella or the supraorbital ridge using a tendon hammer or a bone-conduction vibrator.ResultsOnset latencies of the n10 evoked by taps at Fz or inion were significantly shorter than the R1 components of blink responses to supraorbital and glabellar stimuli. Upward gaze increased the amplitude of n10 but not R1. The n10 was absent bilaterally in patients with bilateral vestibular loss and beneath the contralesional eye in patients with unilateral vestibular loss, but in both these groups of patients R1 was preserved. In severe facial palsy the R1 component was absent or delayed and attenuated ipsilesionally, but n10 was preserved bilaterally. In subjects with unilateral facial and vestibular nerve lesions (Herpes Zoster of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves) the dissociation was complete – the ipsilesional R1 was absent or attenuated whereas the ipsilesional n10 was preserved.Conclusionsn10 is distinguished from R1 by its earlier onset, laterality, modulation by gaze position and dissociation in patient groups.SignificanceThe n10 component evoked by BCV at Fz is not the R1 component of the blink reflex.     

Feasibility of the simultaneous ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in unilateral vestibular hypofunction

ObjectiveThis study compared the results of combined and individual ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) and cervical VEMP (cVEMP) tests in healthy subjects and patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction to confirm the effectiveness of the combined oVEMP and cVEMP test.MethodsTwenty healthy volunteers and 12 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction underwent individual oVEMP and cVEMP tests in a random order, and combined oVEMP and cVEMP test on another day.ResultsTwenty healthy subjects had 100% response rates for oVEMPs and cVEMPs in both individual and combined stimulation modes. Significant positive correlations exist between individual and combined oVEMPs/cVEMPs in terms of latencies and amplitudes. In 12 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction, differences in abnormal percentages of oVEMPs or cVEMPs were non-significant. Additionally, the characteristic parameters of oVEMP/cVEMP among ears of healthy subjects, good and pathological ears of patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction did not differ significantly, regardless of whether the individual or combined mode was used.ConclusionsThe combined oVEMP and cVEMP test generates similar information to that obtained by individual mode, regardless of whether subjects are healthy or have unilateral vestibular hypofunction.SignificanceSimultaneous oVEMP and cVEMP tests may be a convenient screening tool for assessing crossed vestibulo-ocular reflex and ipsilateral sacculo-collic reflex, which definitely shortens the diagnostic test time. Thus, it may favor the large diffusion of these techniques.     

The effects of certain H(1)-antagonists on visual evoked potential in rats

The present study was undertaken to clarify the effects of certain H(1)-antagonists on visual evoked potential (VEP) in rats. Pyrilamine (5 and 10 mg/kg), diphenhydramine (5 and 10 mg/kg) and chlorpheniramine (10 and 20 mg/kg) caused a significant reduction in the amplitude of late VEP components (P(3)-N(3), N(3)-P(4)), although these drugs showed no significant changes in early VEP components (P(1)-N(1), N(1)-P(2)). Cyproheptadine caused a slight enhancement of late components of VEP at a dose of 20 mg/kg. On the other hand, epinastine caused no significant effect on late VEP components even at a dose of 20 mg/kg. The reduction in the late VEP components induced by pyrilamine and diphenhydramine was significantly antagonised by pre-treatment of histidine (200 and 500 mg/kg), but not by physostigmine even at a dose of 0.01 mg/kg. The effect induced by cyproheptadine was significantly potentiated by histidine (500 mg/kg), and significantly reduced by DOI (2 mg/kg). These results indicate that an inhibition of the late VEP components induced by H(1)-antagonist pyrilamine, diphenhydramine and chlorpheniramine may be due to an inhibition of specific sensory system relating the histaminergic mechanisms. In addition, slight enhancement of these components induced by cyproheptadine may be attributable to its anti-serotonergic effects.