Self-adjustment of deep brain stimulation delays optimization in Parkinson’s disease

BackgroundParkinson’s Disease patients undergo time-consuming programming to refine stimulation parameters after deep brain stimulation surgery.ObjectiveTo assess whether the use of the advanced functions of a patient’s programmer would facilitate programming of deep brain stimulation.MethodsThirty patients were randomly allocated to the use of advanced versus simple mode of the patient programmer in this single-centre, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Primary outcome was the number of days required to optimize the stimulation settings.ResultsThe number of days required to optimize stimulation was significantly lower in the simple mode (88.5 ± 33.1 vs. 142.1 ± 67.4, p = 0.01). In addition, the advanced mode group had a higher number of side effects (5.4 ± 3.1 vs. 2.6 ± 1.9, p = 0.0055).ConclusionsThe use of the advanced functions of patient programmer delays programming optimization and it is associated with a higher number of side effects. These findings highlight the need for other methods for faster and safer stimulation programming.     

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation affects heading perception in Parkinson’s disease

Journal of Neurology - Parkinson’s disease (PD) presents with visuospatial impairment and falls. It is critical to understand how subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) modulates...     

Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

Throughout the past decade, there has been a marked increase in surgical therapies, primarily deep brain stimulation (DBS), for the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). DBS of the thalamus has been shown to be effective in reducing parkinsonian tremor; however, it is not the treatment of choice for PD given the progression of other symptoms such as rigidity and bradykinesia. Stimulation of the globus pallidus or the subthalamic nucleus is safe and efficacious in the long-term treatment of all cardinal symptoms of PD, and they are currently the surgeries of choice. Serious adverse events with DBS can occur in 1% to 2% of patients, infection in 5% to 8% of patients, and hardware complications in approximately 25% of patients. Complications associated with DBS are related to the experience of the surgical center. Referring physicians and patients should be aware of the number of surgical procedures and complication rates of any prospective surgical center.     

Postoperative delirium in Parkinson’s disease patients following deep brain stimulation surgery

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is an effective treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. Delirium in hospitalized Parkinson’s disease patients is common and often leads to prolonged hospital stays. This study reports on the incidence and etiology of postoperative delirium following DBS surgery. Patients (n = 59) with advanced Parkinson’s disease underwent bilateral (n = 56) or unilateral (n = 3) DBS electrode implant surgery, followed 1 week later with surgical placement of DBS generators. The development of delirium during either hospital stay was evaluated retrospectively from the hospital chart. Potential causes of delirium were evaluated, including history of delirium, opiate equivalents, medication administration delays and missed doses during hospitalization, and Parkinson’s disease duration. Delirium following implantation of DBS electrodes was common (22% of patients). It was less commonly associated with generator placement (10%). A history of delirium, age, and disease duration were positive predictors of delirium. Opiate equivalent doses were negatively correlated with delirium. Missed Parkinson’s medication doses (53% of patients) and delayed administration (81% of patients) were common, and had a slight relation with delirium. Delirium was not related to complexity of medication regimen or use of dementia medications. Despite the presence of delirium most patients still only required a single night in the hospital post-surgery (67%). Prolonged hospital stay was due not only to delirium but also severe off states and other medical issues. Recognition and expectant management of delirium is best accomplished in a multidisciplinary setting, including the patient’s family and nursing, pharmacy and neurological surgery staff.     

A tool to improve pre-selection for deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease

Determining the eligibility of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be challenging for general (non-specialised) neurologists. We evaluated the use of an online screening tool (Stimulus) that aims to support appropriate referral to a specialised centre for the further evaluation of DBS. Implementation of the tool took place via an ongoing European multicentre educational programme, currently completed in 15 DBS centres with 208 referring neurologists. Use of the tool in daily practice was monitored via an online data capture programme. Selection decisions of patients referred with the assistance of the Stimulus tool were compared to those of patients outside the screening programme. Three years after the start of the programme, 3,128 patient profiles had been entered. The intention for referral was made for 802 patients and referral intentions were largely in accordance with the tool recommendations. Follow-up at 6 months showed that actual referral took place in only 28%, predominantly due to patients’ reluctance to undergo brain surgery. In patients screened with the tool and referred to a DBS centre, the acceptance rate was 77%, significantly higher than that of the unscreened population (48%). The tool showed a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 12% with a positive and negative predictive value of 79 and 75%, respectively. The Stimulus tool is useful in assisting general neurologists to identify appropriate candidates for DBS consideration. The principal reason for not referring potentially eligible patients is their reluctance to undergo brain surgery.     

A decision tool to support appropriate referral for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

Background and objective

Although Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been proven to be an effective treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), it may be difficult for general neurologists to identify appropriate candidates for this procedure. We developed an electronic decision tool that can assist neurologists in deciding which PD patients should be referred for DBS consideration.

Methods

Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, an international expert panel assessed the appropriateness of referral for 972 theoretical patient profiles. Panel results were embedded in an electronic decision support tool which displays the panel statement on referral (appropriate, inappropriate and uncertain) after completion of the patient profile.

Results

Referral was considered appropriate for 33 % of the theoretical profiles. Logistic regression showed excellent internal consistency of the ratings (predictive value 92 %). Symptom severity (OFF-symptoms, dyskinesias, refractory tremor) and PD duration were positively associated with the panel judgment that referral is appropriate. Presence of levodopa-resistant axial symptoms, age ≥ 70 years and presence of cognitive impairment showed the strongest negative impact.

Conclusions

The RAND/UCLA method proved to be useful in determining the appropriate criteria for DBS referral. Validity and applicability of the decision tool (accessible via http://test.stimulus-dbs.org) in clinical practice need to be further determined.

     

Systemic effects of deep brain stimulation on synergic control in Parkinson’s disease

Objective

We explored effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) on the synergic control of fingers in a multi-finger force production task and of muscles in a task involving vertical posture.

Long-term cognitive outcome of bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

The effect of subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) on cognition in Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains controversial, and it is unclear which factors are related to cognitive decline and dementia after STN DBS, especially over the long term. To this end, we analyzed the cognitive outcome of 103 non-demented patients with PD who were followed-up for at least 12 months after bilateral STN DBS surgery. Preoperatively, the patients were evaluated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and neuropsychological tests. The rate of global cognitive decline and the incidence of dementia during follow-up for up to 7 years (mean 42.4 ± 24.5 months) were calculated, and preoperative clinical and neuropsychological factors associated with postoperative global cognitive decline or dementia were analyzed. The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and its relation to later cognitive decline or dementia were also evaluated. The annual decline in the mini–mental state examination score was 0.4 ± 1.7 with impaired attention and executive function and a higher levodopa equivalent dose at baseline being the predictors of a faster global cognitive decline after STN DBS. Dementia developed in 13 patients with an incidence rate of 35.7 per 1,000 person-years. Impaired executive function at baseline predicted dementia. At baseline, 63.1 % of the patients had PD-MCI, and these patients were more likely to develop dementia than those without PD-MCI. This study showed that dysfunctions in the frontostriatal circuitry at baseline were associated with a risk of subsequent global cognitive decline and dementia in patients with PD who underwent STN DBS. In addition, preoperative PD-MCI was a risk factor for dementia after STN DBS.     

Optimizing the deep brain stimulation care pathway in patients with Parkinson’s disease

Management of Parkinson’s disease (PD) using deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires complex care in specialized, multidisciplinary centers. A well-organized, efficient patient flow is crucial to ensure that eligible patients can quickly access DBS. Delays or inefficiencies in patient care may impact a center’s ability to meet demand, creating a capacity bottleneck. Analysis of the current practices within a center may help identify areas for improvement. After external audit of the DBS workflow of the Lyon Neurological Hospital and comparison with other European centers, manageable steps were suggested to restructure the care pathway. Propositions of the audit comprised, for example: (1) directly admitting referred patients to hospital, without a prior neurological outpatient visit and (2) including the preoperative anesthesia consultation in the hospital stay 1 month before surgery, not separately. This reorganization (between 2013 and 2016) was performed without increases in hospital medical resources or costs. The time from patients’ first referral to surgery was reduced (from 22 to 16 months; p = 0.033), as was the number of pre- and postoperative patient visits (11–5; p = 0.025) and the total cumulative length of in-hospital stay (20.5–17.5 nights; p = 0.02). Ultimately, the total number of PD consultations increased (346–498 per year), as did the number of DBS implants per year (32–45 patients). In this single center experience, restructuring the DBS care pathway allowed a higher number of PD patients to benefit from DBS therapy, with a shorter waiting time and without decreasing the quality of care.     

Combined deep brain stimulation and thalamotomy for tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease

Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for Parkinson’s disease, the long-term suppression of tremor is still a challenging issue. We report two patients with tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease (PD) treated with unilateral thalamotomy of the ventralis intermedius nucleus (Vim) combined with the subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA)-DBS. One year after the surgery, thalamotomy of the area from the Vim to the PSA showed improvement not only in tremor but also in rigidity and akinesia. PSA- or STN-DBS with low intensity stimulation eliminated residual PD symptoms. Combined DBS and thalamotomy may provide long-term improvement of the majority of PD symptoms using lower therapeutic stimulation voltages.     

Effect of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on non-motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease

The non-motor consequences of subthalamic stimulation are largely questioned. Cognition, motivation, anxiety, depression and even occurrence of suicides have been considered as a potential consequence of the surgical intervention. Non-motor fluctuations are present in all the patients with motor fluctuations and may sometimes be even more invalidating. Interestingly, subthalamic deep brain stimulation alleviates non-motor fluctuations allowing strikingly successful effects on sensory, dysautonomic and cognitive fluctuations while psychic fluctuations respond less consistently to this treatment. Nevertheless, severe mood fluctuations, oscillating from Off dysphoria to ON hypomania, are frequently associated with addictive behaviors and improve dramatically after subthalamic stimulation. This may be a further argument to support the indication of surgery for these patients.     

Low-frequency subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for axial symptoms in advanced Parkinson’s disease

Axial symptoms such as freezing of gait and falls are common manifestations of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) and are partially responsive to medical treatment. High-frequency (≥130 Hz) deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is highly efficacious in ameliorating appendicular symptoms in PD. However, it is typically less effective in improving axial symptomatology, especially in the long term. We have studied the effects of low-frequency stimulation (LFS) (≤80 Hz) for improving speech, gait and balance dysfunction in the largest patient population to date. PD patients with bilateral STN-DBS and resistant axial symptoms were switched from chronic 130 Hz stimulation to LFS and followed up to 4 years. Primary outcome measures were total motor UPDRS scores, and axial and gait subscores before and after LFS. Bivariate analyses and correlation coefficients were calculated for the different conditions. Potential predictors of therapeutic response were also investigated. Forty-five advanced PD patients who had high frequency stimulation (HFS) for 39.5 ± 27.8 consecutive months were switched to LFS. LFS was kept on for a median period of 111.5 days before the assessment. There was no significant improvement in any of the primary outcomes between HFS and LFS, although a minority of patients preferred to be maintained on LFS for longer periods of time. No predictive factors of response could be identified. There was overall no improvement from LFS in axial symptoms. This could be partly due to some study limitations. Larger prospective trials are warranted to better clarify the impact of stimulation frequency on axial signs.     

Pedunculopontine nucleus deep brain stimulation changes spinal cord excitability in Parkinson’s disease patients

Bilateral peduncolopontine nucleus (PPN) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) was performed in six-advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. We report the effect of both PPN-DBS (25 Hz) and STN-DBS (185 Hz) on patient spinal reflex excitability by utilizing the soleus-Hoffman reflex (HR) threshold. Compared to controls (n = 9), patients showed an increase of HR-threshold, which was scarcely affected by levodopa, but significantly reduced by DBS. In particular, we found that PPN-DBS alone, or plus STN-DBS induced a complete recovery of HR-threshold up to control values. The HR-threshold changes, although do not allow to investigate the contribution of specific intraspinal pathways, suggest that PPN may play a key-role in modulating spinal excitability in PD possibly by improving the basal ganglia-brainstem descending system activity.     

The latest evidence on target selection in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is one of the most promising neuromodulatory techniques to gain momentum over the last 20 years, with significant evidence showing the benefit of DBS for Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, many questions still exist pertaining to the optimal placement of stimulation contacts. This paper aims to review the latest and most relevant studies evaluating subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) stimulation. Additionally, it aims to shine a light on several of the lesser-known targets with mounting evidence of efficacy. Referenced literature for the main body of the article was gathered from Medline and PubMed databases. Results were limited to “full text”, “English language” and publications from 1999 onwards. Case reports were excluded. The current evidence irrefutably demonstrates the benefits of both STN and GPi DBS on Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III motor scores, with very similar outcomes seen after 1–2 years. Currently, it appears the greatest differences lie in the associated adverse effects. STN DBS was associated with a greater reduction in dopamine replacement therapy, but also appeared to have more negative effects on speech and mood. Meanwhile, in regards to alternative targets, the pedunculopontine nucleus has shown promising improvement in axial symptoms, while the ventral intermediate nucleus has demonstrated significant efficacy at suppressing tremor, and the caudal zona incerta may be superior to the STN and GPi in improving UPDRS-III scores. Due to the complexity of Parkinson’s disease, an individual disease profile must be determined in a patient-by-patient fashion such that appropriate targets can be selected accordingly.     

Behavioral changes associated with deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease

Evaluation for psychiatric and cognitive dysfunction is a crucial part of preoperative assessment for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. All candidates for DBS should be treated for active psychiatric disorders, and the treatment team should also screen for past psychiatric history, which may predispose to postoperative psychiatric illness. A wide range of behavioral symptoms have been seen following DBS, including depression, hallucinations or true psychosis, mania, and impulsivity. Suicidal ideation should be treated aggressively. Cognitive changes may occur, but data are currently too limited to make predictions regarding subtle effects on cognition. However, patients with dementia may experience further decline in cognitive function following DBS.     

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation and levodopa in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of combined effects

Journal of Neurology - While subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and levodopa improve motor symptoms in Parkinson disease (PD) to a similar magnitude, their combined effect remains...