Differential effect of baclofen on cortical and spinal inhibitory circuits

ObjectiveThe cutaneous silent period (SP) is a spinal inhibitory reflex, which suppresses activity in spinal motor nuclei. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicits a cortical SP, which represents GABA_B receptor-mediated inhibition of cortical excitability. Baclofen as a strong GABA_B agonist effectively reduces muscle hypertonia, however, it is not known whether intrathecal baclofen (ITB) may modulate spinal inhibitory circuits.MethodsWe evaluated clinical and neurophysiological effects of ITB in ten patients with severe spasticity due to spinal cord injury (n = 9) and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (n = 1). Neurophysiological assessment included H reflex and cutaneous and cortical SPs, before and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min after ITB bolus administration.ResultsITB suppressed soleus H reflex as early as 15 min after lumbar bolus injection; MAS scores declined after 1 h. Cortical SP end latency and duration increased progressively with a significant maximum 3 h following ITB bolus, whereas cutaneous SP latency and duration did not change significantly.ConclusionThe present findings suggest that baclofen does not affect the cutaneous SP, but prolongs the cortical SP.SignificanceThe spinal inhibitory circuitry of the cutaneous SP is not modulated by GABA_B receptor-mediated activity, in contrast to the cortical inhibitory circuitry of the cortical SP, which is subject to powerful GABA_B control.     

Asymmetric bilateral effect of the supplementary motor area proper in the human motor system

ObjectiveThis study aimed to clarify the function of human supplementary motor area proper (SMA) by the single-pulse electric stimulation method and its clinical usefulness for SMA mapping.MethodsWe studied five patients with epilepsy or brain tumour who underwent invasive functional mapping with subdural electrodes. Single-pulse electric stimulation of primary motor area (MI) and SMA was carried out through pairs of subdural electrodes, and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from surface electromyogram on both sides and also cortico-cortical-evoked potentials (CCEPs) from electrocorticogram.ResultsSMA stimulation elicited: (1) MEPs and following silent periods (SPs) in the contralateral upper and lower extremities, (2) SPs with or without minimal MEPs in the ipsilateral upper extremity and (3) CCEPs in the somatotopically corresponding region of the ipsilateral MI. Compared with MI stimulation, SMA stimulation required higher stimulus intensities (mean 14.2 mA (SMA) vs. 8.5 mA (MI)) to elicit MEPs and showed significantly longer onset latencies in upper extremity (range: 4–10 ms).ConclusionsThe results demonstrated an asymmetric bilateral effect of human SMA upon the corticospinal pathway.SignificanceSingle-pulse electric cortical stimulation would be clinically useful for distinguishing SMA from MI. The asymmetric bilateral effect of SMA might be conveyed through the direct descending pathway.     

Increased cortical excitability after selective REM sleep deprivation in healthy humans: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

BackgroundREM sleep has antiepileptogenic properties whereas, its loss is known to have a proconvulsive role. However, the mechanisms underlying the proepileptogenic effects of REM sleep deprivation are yet not fully understood. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of selective REM sleep deprivation (SRD) on cortical excitability in healthy subjects by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).MethodsTen normal subjects underwent three TMS sessions: (1) in baseline condition (BL), (2) after SRD by awakening them at each REM sleep onset and (3) after non-rapid eye movement sleep awakenings (NREM-A) as control for potential non-specific effects of interruptions. The TMS investigation included two protocols: (a) the evaluation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and silent period (SP) parameters, recorded in response to single pulse magnetic stimulation; (b) the evaluation of the time course of intracortical motor activity tested with paired-pulse TMS applied at inter-stimulus intervals of 1–10 ms.ResultsAfter SRD the principal finding observed using single pulse TMS was a significant reduction in the duration of SP whereas, a reduction of intracortical inhibition was found, using the paired-pulse TMS. TMS parameters did not show significant changes after NREM-A with respect to BL.ConclusionsSRD may influence cortical excitability with a reduction of inhibitory intracortical mechanisms, thus supporting the proconvulsant role of REM loss.     

Motor cortex activation by H-coil and figure-8 coil at different depths. Combined motor threshold and electric field distribution study

ObjectiveTo compare the ability of an H-coil and figure-8 coil to stimulate different motor cortex regions.MethodsThe resting (rMT) and active (aMT) motor thresholds were measured for the right hand APB and leg AHB muscles in 10 subjects, using an H-coil and a figure-8 coil. The electric field distribution induced by the coils was measured in a head model. The combination of the hand and leg MTs with the field measurements was used to determine the depth of hand and leg motor areas via the intersection points.ResultsThe rMT and aMT of both APB and AHB were significantly lower for the H-coil. The ratio and difference between the leg and hand rMT and aMT were significantly lower for the H-Coil. Electric field measurements revealed significantly more favorable depth profile and larger volume of stimulation for the H-coil. The averaged intersection for the APB was at a distance from coil of 1.83 ± 0.54 cm and at an intensity of 97.8 ± 21.4 V/m, while for the AHB it was at a distance of 2.73 ± 0.44 cm and at an intensity of 118.6 ± 21.3 V/m.ConclusionThe results suggest a more efficient activation of deeper motor cortical regions using the H-coil.SignificanceThe combined evaluation of MTs by H- and figure-8 coils allows measurement of the individual depth of different motor cortex regions. This could be helpful for optimizing stimulation parameters for TMS treatment.     

TMS-EEG co-registration: On TMS-induced artifact

ObjectiveThe combination of brain stimulation by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and simultaneous electroencephalographic (EEG) recording has the potential to be of great value for understanding human brain functions. Recording EEG during TMS can be technically challenging because TMS induces a very strong electrical field that can saturate recording amplifiers for a long duration. Advances in amplifier technology, however, have led to the development of TMS-compatible EEG equipment that can work in very high, time-varying magnetic fields without saturation. The aim of the present study was to identify stimulus-related artifacts, and to provide experimental data containing the length of the artifact induced by the magnetic field and its variations with respect to the experimental setting.MethodsA phantom head was stimulated to record the artifact while excluding cortical responses. We tested different types of electrodes, coils, models of stimulator, and frequencies and intensities of stimulation to see how these parameters influence the duration of the artifact.ResultsThe electrical artifact produced by the magnetic pulse lasted approximately 5 ms following TMS onset. Its length was invariant irrespective of different experimental conditions.ConclusionsThese data suggest that it is possible to analyze the cortical evoked response induced by TMS 5 ms after TMS onset.SignificanceThe possibility to study the early physiological responses to TMS stimulation may have valuable implications for both clinical and experimental purposes, providing information about the early direct cortical response of the stimulated areas.     

Cortical excitability in drug naive juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of diurnal variability on cortical excitability using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in drug naive patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) and to look for any differences in cortical excitability between males and females.MethodsThirty drug-naive patients with JME and 10 healthy controls were studied. Resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potential (MEP), the duration of central motor conduction time (CMCT) and cortical silent period (CSP) were measured, twice, first early in the morning and again in the afternoon of the same day.ResultsDiurnal variation with higher evening values of CMCT and CSP were observed in the control group. In the study group, diurnal variation in RMT, CMCT and CSP was found with higher values in the morning than in control group. However, only the raised values of CSP [mean, 110.7 ms, morning and 96.44 ms, evening] were of statistical significance [p = 0.005, morning and 0.039, evening] as compared to controls. In the study group, males had higher values of RMT, CMCT and CSP than in females. However, the CMCT in males was lower in the evening study than in females. Further, RMT and morning CMCT was lower in females than in controls. In females, the morning CSP [mean, 100.91 ms, morning versus 87.86 ms, evening] was significantly prolonged [p = 0.017, morning versus 0.221, evening] as compared to controls.ConclusionThe study is suggestive of the existence of impaired supraspinal/intracortical inhibitory circuits which may account for the hyperexcitability of the motor system being prominent in the morning among drug naïve patients with JME. In this study, increased activity of cortical inhibitory networks, as evidenced by prolonged cortical silent period existed among drug naïve JME patients, but was found to be significant only in female patients. This may explain the increased seizure susceptibility in this cohort, at this time of the day and an increased manifestation of JME in females.     

Sensory afferent inhibition within and between limbs in humans

ObjectiveTo examine the distribution and inter-limb interaction of short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) in the arm and leg.MethodsMotor evoked potentials (MEPs) in distal and proximal arm, shoulder and leg muscles induced with ranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were conditioned by painless electrical stimuli applied to the index finger (D2) and great toe (T1) at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 15, 25–35, 80 ms (D2) and 35, 45, 55, 65 and 100 ms (T1) in 27 healthy human subjects. TMS was delivered over primary motor cortex (M1) arm and leg areas. Electrical stimulus intensities were varied between 1 and 3 times the sensory perception thresholds. We also tested effects of posterior cutaneous brachial nerve (PCBN) stimulation on MEPs in arm muscles at ISIs of 18 and 28 ms.ResultsD2 but not PCBN electrical conditioning reduced MEP amplitudes in upper limb muscles at ISIs of 25 and 35 ms. SAI was more pronounced in distal as compared to proximal arm muscles. Also, SAI following D2 stimulation increased with higher conditioning intensities. D2 stimulation did not change lower limb muscles MEPs. In ontrast, T1 stimulation did not induce SAI in any muscles but caused MEP facilitation in a foot muscle at an ISI of 55 ms and in upper limb muscles at ISIs of 35 and 55 ms. Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were not affected by electrical T1 conditioning.ConclusionD2 stimulation causes segmental SAI in upper limb muscles with a distal to proximal attenuation without affecting leg muscles. In contrast, toe stimulation facilitates motor output both in foot and upper arm muscles.SignificanceOur data suggest that cutaneo-motor pathways in arms and legs are functionally organized in a different way with cutaneo-motor interactions induced by toe stimulation probably relayed at a thalamic level. Abnormal cutaneo-motor interactions following electrical toe stimulation may serve as an electrophysiological marker of thalamic dysfunction, e.g. in neurodegenerative diseases.     

Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation over the posterior fossa (PF) as a non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in man.MethodsWe replicated a previously reported conditioning-test paradigm in 11 healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at varying intensities was applied to the PF and motor cortex with a 3, 5 or 7 ms interstimulus interval (ISI), chosen randomly for each trial. Surface electromyogram (EMG) activity was recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles and two forearm muscles. Responses were averaged and rectified, and MEP amplitudes were compared to assess whether suppression of the motor output occurred as a result of the PF conditioning pulse.ResultsCortical MEPs were suppressed following conditioning-test ISIs of 5 or 7 ms. No suppression occurred with an ISI of 3 ms. PF stimuli alone also produced EMG responses, suggesting direct activation of the corticospinal tract (CST).ConclusionsCST collaterals are known to contact cortical inhibitory interneurones; antidromic CST activation could therefore contribute to the observed suppression of cortical MEPs.SignificancePF stimulation probably activates multiple pathways; even at low intensities it should not be regarded as a selective assessment of cerebellar function unless stringent controls can confirm the absence of confounding activity in other pathways.     

Inhibition of the anterior intraparietal area and the dorsal premotor cortex interfere with arbitrary visuo-motor mapping

ObjectiveThe contribution of the human anterior intraparietal area and the dorsal premotor cortex to arbitrary visuo-motor mapping during grasping were tested.MethodsTrained right-handed subjects reached for and pincer-grasped a cube with the right hand in the absence of visual feedback after the cube location had been displayed for 200 ms. During the reaching movements, the colour of the cube changed and visual feedback about the change of colour was provided for 100 ms at 500 ms after movement onset (at the time of peak grasp aperture). Depending on colour, subjects were instructed to either pincer-grasp the cube in a horizontal or vertical grasp position with the latter necessitating wrist rotation (experiment 1) or to pincer-grasp and transport the cube to either a left or right target position (experiment 2). Within two consecutive 200 ms time windows (TMS 1 and 2) starting 500 ms and 700 ms after movement onset, respectively, double pulses of supra-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (inter-stimulus interval: 100 ms) were delivered over (i) the left primary motor cortex (90° vertically angulated coil position, control stimulation), (ii) the left dorsal premotor cortex or (ii) the left anterior intraparietal area.ResultsCompared to control stimulation, stimulation of the anterior intraparietal area, but not of the dorsal premotor cortex, at TMS 1 delayed the times to wrist rotation (experiment 1) and hand transport (experiment 2). Compared to control stimulation, stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex, but not of the anterior intraparietal area, at TMS 2 delayed both wrist rotation (experiment 1) and hand transport (experiment 2).ConclusionsWe contend that the anterior intraparietal area and the dorsal premotor cortex are both involved albeit at different phases during the mapping of arbitrary visual cues with goal directed grasp and transport movements.SignificanceThese data add to the current understanding of how human cortical areas work in concert during manual activities.     

Lateralization of forelimb motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in rats

ObjectivesTo approximate methods for human transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in rats, we tested whether lateralized cortical stimulation resulting in selective activation of one forelimb contralateral to the site of stimulation could be achieved by TMS in the rat.MethodsMotor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded from the brachioradialis muscle bilaterally in adult male anesthetized rats (n = 13). A figure-of-eight TMS coil was positioned lateral to midline. TMS intensity was increased stepwise from subthreshold intensities to maximal machine output in order to generate input–output curves and to determine the motor threshold (MT) for brachioradialis activation.ResultsIn 100% of the animals, selective activation of the contralateral brachioradialis, in the absence of ipsilateral brachioradialis activation was achieved, and the ipsilateral brachioradialis was activated only at TMS intensities exceeding contralateral forelimb MT. With increasing TMS intensity, the amplitudes of both the ipsilateral and contralateral signals increased in proportion to TMS strength. However, the input–output curves for the contralateral and ipsilateral brachioradialis were significantly different (p < 0.001) such that amplitude of the ipsilateral MEP was reliably lower than the contralateral signal.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that lateralized TMS leading to asymmetric brachioradialis activation is feasible with conventional TMS equipment in anesthetized rats.SignificanceThese data show that TMS can be used to assess the unilateral excitability of the forelimb descending motor pathway in the rat, and suggest that rat TMS protocols analogous to human TMS may be applied in future translational research.     

Altered cortical excitability in patients with untreated obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

ObjectiveTo investigate cortical excitability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) during wakefulness.MethodsThe authors recruited 45 untreated severe OSAS (all males, mean age 47.2 years, mean apnea–hypopnea index = 44.6 h^?1) patients and 44 age-matched healthy male volunteers (mean apnea–hypopnea index = 3.4 h^?1). The TMS parameters measured were resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, cortical silent period (CSP), and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). These parameters were measured in the morning (9–10 am) more than 2 h after arising and the parameters of patients and controls were compared. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) were also measured before the TMS study.ResultsOSAS patients had a significantly higher RMT and a longer CSP duration (t-test, p < 0.001) compared to healthy volunteers. No significant difference was observed between MEP amplitudes at any stimulus intensity or between the SICI (2, 3, 5 ms) and ICF (10, 15, 20 ms) values of OSAS patients and healthy volunteers (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThis TMS-based study suggests that untreated severe OSAS patients have imbalanced cortical excitabilities that enhanced inhibition or decreased brain excitability when awake during the day.     

Neuromagnetic activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex following tactile-on and tactile-off stimulation

ObjectiveMagnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were performed to investigate the cortical activation following tactile-on and tactile-off stimulation.MethodsWe used a 306-ch whole-head MEG system and a tactile stimulator driven by a piezoelectric actuator. Tactile stimuli were applied to the tip of right index finger. The interstimulus interval was set at 2000 ms, which included a constant stimulus of 1000 ms duration.ResultsProminent somatosensory evoked magnetic fields were recorded from the contralateral hemisphere at 57.5 ms and 133.0 ms after the onset of tactile-on stimulation and at 58.2 ms and 138.5 ms after the onset of tactile-off stimulation. All corresponding equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) were located in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). Moreover, long-latency responses (168.7 ms after tactile-on stimulation, 169.8 ms after tactile-off stimulation) were detected from the ipsilateral hemisphere. The ECDs of these signals were identified in the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII).ConclusionsThe somatosensory evoked magnetic fields waveforms elicited by the two tactile stimuli (tactile-on and tactile-off stimuli) with a mechanical stimulator were strikingly similar. These mechanical stimuli elicited both contralateral SI and ipsilateral SII activities.SignificanceTactile stimulation with a mechanical stimulator provides new possibilities for experimental designs in studies of the human mechanoreceptor system.     

The effect of modafinil on cortical excitability in patients with narcolepsy: A randomized,placebo-controlled,crossover study

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of modafinil on cortical excitability in patients with narcolepsy using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).MethodsNineteen drug-naïve narcolepsy patients with cataplexy (10 males, 9 females, and mean age 28.5 years) and 25 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. In this double-blind, randomized, crossover study, patients and controls received a single dose of 400 mg modafinil or placebo. Modafinil and placebo administrations were separated by a 2-week washout period. TMS parameters, such as resting motor thresholds (RMT), motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes, cortical silent periods (CSP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF), were measured before and 3 h after administering modafinil or placebo. The differences of TMS parameters were statistically tested between patients and controls and between before and after modafinil or placebo administration.ResultsNarcolepsy patients had significantly increased CSP durations compared to controls (independent t-test, P < 0.05), indicating decreased excitability of cortical networks in human narcolepsy. In patients after modafinil administration, MEP amplitudes, SICI, and ICF increased, and CSP duration shortened significantly, meaning enhanced motor excitability, whereas in controls modafinil did not change TMS parameters significantly. Placebo administration did not affect TMS parameters both in patients or controls.ConclusionsNarcolepsy patients with cataplexy showed decreased cortical excitability than normal healthy controls. Single dose modafinil significantly increased motor excitability in narcolepsy patients but had no effect in healthy controls.     

Exercise-induced strengthening of inter-digital connections in musicians

ObjectiveTo investigate whether finger exercise affects surround inhibition in professional musicians as it was previously observed in non-musicians, we performed a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study in 13 healthy right-handed professional musicians.MethodsTMS was set to be triggered by self-initiated flexion of the index finger at 3 ms after electromyography onset (self-triggered TMS). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) were measured before and at 0, 10, 20 and 30 min after ‘single’ (little finger abduction) and ‘dual’ (both index finger flexion and little finger abduction) exercise at 0.5 Hz for 30 min.ResultsControl and self-triggered MEPs were not different between the two exercise sessions. MEP enhancements were significantly greater in self-triggered TMS than control TMS after single exercise as well as dual exercise.ConclusionThis result demonstrates that MEP enhancement in self-triggered TMS was comparable between two exercise sessions in professional musicians, a result different from that observed in healthy non-musicians. Enhanced self-triggered MEPs after isolated finger exercise suggest that inter-digital cortical connections are strengthened in musicians, presumably due to previous musical training.SignificanceInter-digital cortical connections are strengthened in musicians and are not differently modulated by different types of short-term finger exercise.     

Effects of water immersion on short- and long-latency afferent inhibition,short-interval intracortical inhibition,and intracortical facilitation

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of water immersion (WI) on short- and long-latency afferent inhibition (SAI and LAI), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF).MethodsMotor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of fifteen healthy males before, during, and after a 15-min WI at 30 °C up to the axilla. Both SAI and LAI were evaluated by measuring MEPs in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the left motor cortex following electrical stimulation of the right median nerve (fixed at about three times the sensory threshold) at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 20 ms to assess SAI and 200 ms to assess LAI. The paired-pulse TMS paradigm was used to measure SICI and ICF.ResultsBoth SAI and LAI were reduced during WI, while SICI and ICF were not significantly different before, during, and after WI.ConclusionsWI decreased SAI and LAI by modulating the processing of afferent inputs.SignificanceChanges in somatosensory processing and sensorimotor integration may contribute to the therapeutic benefits of WI for chronic pain or movement disorders.     

Cortical mechanisms mediating the inhibitory period after magnetic stimulation of the facial motor area

We studied the silent period (SP) that interrupts voluntary electromyographic activity (EMG) in facial muscles, after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in normal subjects. High-intensity magnetic stimulation with a 12-cm round coil centered at the vertex induced a long-lasting SP (215 ms), whereas supramaximal stimulation of the facial nerve only induced a short (< 20 ms) and incomplete EMG suppression, and cutaneous stimuli had no inhibitory effect at all. Cutaneous trigeminal stimulation delivered after TMS evoked blink-like reflexes, showing that facial motoneurons were not inhibited during the SP. Simultaneous recordings from perioral muscles (large cortical representation) and from orbicularis oculi and masseter muscles (small cortical representation) showed SPs of identical duration. Focal stimuli with a figure-of-eight coil showed that positioning of the coil was critical and that the optimal scalp sites for evoking the largest motor potentials and longest SPs coincided. Low-intensity stimulation occasionally elicited short SPs without a preceding motor potential. We conclude that the SP induced in facial muscles by TMS results from the excitation of cortical inhibitory interneurons surrounding the upper motoneurons. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve, 20, 418–424, 1997.     

Effects of spinal cord stimulation on the cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in failed back surgery syndrome patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate the functional activation of the somatosensory cortical regions in neuropathic pain patients during therapeutic spinal cord stimulation (SCS).MethodsIn nine failed back surgery syndrome patients, the left tibial and the left sural nerves were stimulated in two sessions with intensities at motor and pain thresholds, respectively. The cortical somatosensory evoked potentials were analyzed using source dipole analysis based on 111 EEG signals.ResultsThe short-latency components of the source located in the right primary somatosensory cortex (SI: 43, 54 and 65 ms) after tibial nerve stimulation, the mid-latency SI component (87 ms) after sural nerve stimulation, and the mid-latency components in the right (≈161 ms) and left (≈168 ms) secondary somatosensory cortices (SII) were smaller in the presence of SCS than in absence of SCS. The long-latency source component arising from the mid-cingulate cortex (≈313 ms) was smaller for tibial and larger for sural nerve stimuli during SCS periods compared to periods without SCS.ConclusionsSCS attenuates the somatosensory processing in the SI and SII. In the mid-cingulate cortex, the effect of SCS depends on the type of stimulation and nerve fibers involved.SignificanceResults suggest that the effects of SCS on cortical somatosensory processing may contribute to a reduction of allodynia during SCS.     

Methodology for intraoperatively eliciting motor evoked potentials in the vocal muscles by electrical stimulation of the corticobulbar tract

ObjectiveTo establish a methodology for recording corticobulbar motor evoked potentials (CoMEPs) from vocal muscles after transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and direct cortical stimulation (DCS).MethodsTwenty-four patients were included in this study (22 for TES, 2 for DCS, 3 for TES plus DCS) that underwent different surgical procedures. We used two methods to elicit CoMEPs: (a) TES by stimulation over C3/Cz or C4/Cz and (b) DCS with a strip electrode placed over the primary motor area (M1) for laryngeal muscles. To record CoMEPs from vocal muscles we used two hook wire electrodes 76 μm of diameter passing through 27 gauge needle endotracheally placed in the vocal muscles after intubation.ResultsRecording of CoMEPs in the vocal muscles after TES was successfully performed in 22 patients. TES over the right or left hemisphere elicit responses bilaterally. The onset latencies for the right vocal muscle was 12.4 ± 3.1 ms (ipsilateral stimulation) and 12.7 ±2.2 ms (contralateral stimulation) while for the left vocal muscle, onset latency was 12.9 ± 2.3 ms (ipsilateral stimulation) and 14.1 ± 3.4 ms (contralateral stimulation). In five patients DCS elicited CoMEPs in right and left vocal muscle with latency of 16.6 ± 4.7 and 15.6 ± 3.7 ms, respectively.ConclusionThe method to elicit and record CoMEPs in vocal muscles shows reliable results and adds one more tool in the armamentarium of intraoperative neurophysiology.SignificanceThis method shows the ability to continuously monitor the functional integrity of corticobulbar pathways, vagal nucleus and laryngeal nerves.     

Reduced plastic brain responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

ObjectivesAbnormalities in cortical excitability have been proposed to underlie the pathophysiology of various neurocognitive manifestations of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a noninvasive method for study and modulation of cortical excitability in the human brain, and repetitive TMS (rTMS) has been proven useful for neurophysiologic investigation in various neurologic conditions. We aimed to investigate cortical excitability in patients with OSAS during wakefulness and to determine if rTMS would change the abnormal excitability patterns.MethodsMeasures of motor cortical and corticospinal excitability (resting motor threshold [RMT], motor-evoked potential [MEP] amplitude, and cortical silent period [CSP]) were taken before and after a session of 10-Hz rTMS applied to the motor cortex in 13 individuals with untreated severe OSAS (apnea–hypopnea index [AHI] > 30) and 12 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC).ResultsOSAS subjects had a significantly higher RMT (P < .003) and a longer CSP duration (P < .002) compared to HC. No difference was observed between MEP values of OSAS subjects and HC (P > .05). In response to rTMS, the HC group had a significant increase in CSP and MEP values from baseline, which were absent in OSAS subjects.ConclusionsIndividuals with OSAS demonstrated increased motor cortex inhibition, which did not respond to 10-Hz rTMS. As rTMS-induced changes in MEP and CSP involve a separate neurotransmitter system (N-methyl-d-aspartate [NMDA] and gamma-aminobutyric acid [GABA], respectively), these findings suggest a widespread alteration in cortical neurophysiology in severe OSAS subjects that requires clarification with further exploration.     

Cutaneous silent period changes in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with small fiber neuropathy

ObjectiveSmall myelinated (A-δ) and unmyelinated (C) somatic sensory fibers are initially affected and may be the earliest exhibited sign of neuropathy in glucose dysmetabolism. Cutaneous silent period (CSP) is an inhibitory spinal reflex and its afferents consist of A-δ nerve fibers. The aim of this study was to evaluate CSP changes in Type 2 diabetic patients with small fiber neuropathy.MethodsForty-three patients and 41 healthy volunteers were included. CSP latency and duration, as well as CSP latency difference of the upper and lower extremities, were examined.ResultsNerve conduction studies were within normal limits in both groups. Lower extremity CSP latency was longer (122.1 ± 15.5 vs. 96.4 ± 6.4 ms; p < 0.001), CSP duration was shorter (29.5 ± 8.9 vs. 43.1 ± 5.0 ms; p < 0.001), and latency difference was longer (48.1 ± 12.6 vs. 22.7 ± 3.7; p < 0.001) in patients than controls. The difference was more significant in patients with neuropathic pain. No significant difference existed in upper extremity on CSP evaluation.ConclusionThe CSP evaluation together with nerve conduction study, has been demonstrated to be beneficial and performance of latency difference in addition to CSP latency and duration may be a valuable parameter in electrophysiological assessment of diabetic patients with small fiber neuropathy.SignificanceAn additional CSP evaluation may be considered in cases which nerve conduction studies do not provide sufficient information.