History taking by physiotherapists with low back pain patients: are illness perceptions addressed properly?

Purpose: Despite the increasing evidence that illness perceptions should be addressed in patients, there is a lack of studies evaluating whether physiotherapists question illness perceptions. This study, using a mixed-methods design, investigates the integration of illness perceptions during the first consultation of physiotherapists treating patients with low back pain (LBP). Methods: Thirty-four physiotherapists performed usual history taking in a patient with non-specific LBP. The interview was audiotaped and illness perceptions were indexed using an observational instrument, based on the domains of Leventhal’s Common Sense Model. Patients were also asked to fill in the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised for LBP. Results: Physiotherapists assessed the illness identity, also perceptions regarding the (physical) cause and controllability of LBP were evaluated. Illness perceptions, such as timeline, consequences, coherence and emotional representation, were poorly assessed. Results of the questionnaire reveal that LBP-patients report overuse, workload and bad posture as primary cause. Patients held positive beliefs about the controllability and have high illness coherence. Conclusion: Belgian physiotherapists mainly question bio-medically oriented illness perceptions, e.g. physical symptoms and causes, but do not sufficiently address psychosocially oriented illness perceptions as recommended in LBP guidelines.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Belgian physiotherapists mainly question biomedical oriented illness perceptions (illness identity, provoking factors and treatment control) in patients with low back pain (LBP) during the history taking (i.e. the first consultation).

• From a bio-psycho-social view psychosocially oriented illness perceptions should be incorporated in the daily routine of physiotherapist’s to comply with the bio-psycho-social treatment guidelines for LBP.

• Continuing education is mandatory in order to improve physiotherapists’ knowledge regarding the use of all dimensions of illness perceptions in the assessment of patients with LBP.

     

Responses to Threat Information

Using the Common Sense Model to examine responses to health risk information, a laboratory study was conducted. Subjects were assigned randomly to one of four groups by manipulating information about high or normal blood glucose (BG) and a low or high threat message about the controllability of Type II diabetes. Subjects in the high BG groups reported more diabetes-related symptoms and stronger intentions to change certain behaviors. Subjects reading a high-threat message expressed stronger intentions to see a health professional than did those reading a low-threat message. The results suggest that perceptions of one's risk status and the degree of threat associated with an illness effects symptom perceptions and behavioral intentions.     

Illness perceptions and mood states are associated with injury-related outcomes in athletes

Background.?Athletes have to cope adequately with the consequences of their injury in order to return into sports as soon as possible. Besides the physical characteristics of the injury, illness perceptions and emotional responses impact the behavioural responses to the injury.

Purpose.?To apply Leventhal's Common Sense Model as a theoretical framework in the field of sports medicine, pertaining to injured athletes.

Methods.?In a sample of 95 injured athletes participating in different sports, sociodemographic, injury and sport-related characteristics, the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised-Sports (IPQ-R-S) and the Profile Of Mood States were assessed.

Results.?Injured athletes' most experienced symptoms were pain (82%) and loss of strength (50%), associated with a high controllability; they see their injury as not chronic, with minor consequences for daily life and minor emotional consequences. Athletes with an injury of longer duration have minor psychological attributions, 28% suffer from fatigue, which is strongly related to a negative mood state.

Conclusions.?Illness perceptions and mood states are related to injury characteristics. Clinicians ought to incorporate patients' views about their injuries into their treatment in order to increase the concordance between patient's and clinician's perceptions, thereby increasing chances of a quick and uneventful recovery.     

Recognition of central sensitization in patients with musculoskeletal pain: Application of pain neurophysiology in manual therapy practice

Central sensitization plays an important role in the pathophysiology of numerous musculoskeletal pain disorders, yet it remains unclear how manual therapists can recognize this condition. Therefore, mechanism based clinical guidelines for the recognition of central sensitization in patients with musculoskeletal pain are provided. By using our current understanding of central sensitization during the clinical assessment of patients with musculoskeletal pain, manual therapists can apply the science of nociceptive and pain processing neurophysiology to the practice of manual therapy. The diagnosis/assessment of central sensitization in individual patients with musculoskeletal pain is not straightforward, however manual therapists can use information obtained from the medical diagnosis, combined with the medical history of the patient, as well as the clinical examination and the analysis of the treatment response in order to recognize central sensitization. The clinical examination used to recognize central sensitization entails the distinction between primary and secondary hyperalgesia.     

Work limitations and employer adjustments for employees with chronic illness

This study measured work limitations and work adjustments among chronically ill employees with regard to three distinct job characteristics: physical work demands, cognitive work demands and social work demands. The study presents findings from an organizational-based survey, from which 610 respondents reported managing employees with a chronic illness. These included arthritis, musculoskeletal pain, diabetes, asthma, migraine, heart disease, irritable bowel syndrome and depression. The results indicate that depression had the largest impact in all three work demand categories, while musculoskeletal pain principally affected physical work demands and migraine and diabetes largely affected cognitive work demands. For other chronic illnesses, it was the generic symptoms of the illness (for example, fatigue) that resulted in a work limitation, rather than the specific nature of the illness itself. Employer work adjustments were available to those people with illnesses that required a physical work adjustment (for example, musculoskeletal pain). For other chronic illnesses, with the exception of depression, disclosing an illness was the strongest predictor for work adjustments in cognitive tasks and the provision of social support. Those with depression were least likely to receive a cognitive work adjustment, indicating either a low disclosure rate in this group or that employers' perceptions of depression may be a barrier to providing suitable work adjustments.     

Physical and psychosocial adaptation of blacks on hemodialysis.

Roy's Adaptation Model was used to study problems and coping strategies reported by 102 blacks on hemodialysis. Although the most frequently identified problems were fatigue, muscle soreness, and physical limitations, food and fluid restrictions were most bothersome. Participants used multiple strategies to cope with the illness and its treatment. Putting trust in God was the most frequently identified strategy. These findings can be used to enhance the physical and psychosocial assessment of these patients and facilitate the ability of clinicians to intervene effectively in helping clients cope with the problems that are associated with the illness and its treatment.     

Long‐term follow‐up of tailored behavioural treatment and exercise based physical therapy in persistent musculoskeletal pain: A randomized controlled trial in primary care

This study examined long‐term effects of a tailored behavioural treatment protocol (TBT), as compared with an exercise based physical therapy protocol (EBT). One‐hundred and twenty‐two patients who, due to persistent musculoskeletal pain, consulted physical therapists in primary care were originally randomized to either of the two conditions. Follow‐up assessments two‐year post‐treatment were completed by 65 participants. According to per‐protocol analyses, short‐term effects were maintained in both groups for the primary outcome, pain‐related disability. The TT‐group reported lower disability levels compared with the EBT‐group. Intention‐to‐treat analyses (ITT) conveyed similar results. Secondary outcomes of pain intensity, pain control, and functional self‐efficacy were maintained over the 2‐year post‐treatment, but previous group differences were levelled out according to the most conservative method of ITT. Fear of movement/(re)injury increased in the EBT‐group, and EBT participants reported higher fear of movement/(re)injury two years post‐treatment compared to TT. The study supports tailoring of treatments in concordance with patients’ needs and preferences of activity goals and functional behavioural analyses including predictors of pain‐related disability, for successful immediate outcomes and their maintenance in the long run. Exercise‐based treatments resulted in somewhat smaller immediate treatment effects but had similar maintenance of effects over the 2‐year follow‐up period.     

How to explain central sensitization to patients with 'unexplained' chronic musculoskeletal pain: practice guidelines

Central sensitization provides an evidence-based explanation for many cases of ‘unexplained’ chronic musculoskeletal pain. Prior to commencing rehabilitation in such cases, it is crucial to change maladaptive illness perceptions, to alter maladaptive pain cognitions and to reconceptualise pain. This can be accomplished by patient education about central sensitization and its role in chronic pain, a strategy known as pain physiology education. Pain physiology education is indicated when: 1) the clinical picture is characterized and dominated by central sensitization; and 2) maladaptive illness perceptions are present. Both are prerequisites for commencing pain physiology education. Face-to-face sessions of pain physiology education, in conjunction with written educational material, are effective for changing pain cognitions and improving health status in patients with various chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. These include patients with chronic low back pain, chronic whiplash, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. After biopsychosocial assessment pain physiology education comprises of a first face-to-face session explaining basic pain physiology and contrasting acute nociception versus chronic pain (Session 1). Written information about pain physiology should be provided as homework in between session 1 and 2. The second session can be used to correct misunderstandings, and to facilitate the transition from knowledge to adaptive pain coping during daily life. Pain physiology education is a continuous process initiated during the educational sessions and continued within both the active treatment and during the longer term rehabilitation program.     

Association of Musculoskeletal Pain With Sedentary Behavior in Public School Teachers: The Role of Habitual Physical Activity

BackgroundSedentary behavior has been associated with musculoskeletal pain in school teachers. However, our hypothesis is that physical activity practice could mitigate this association.AimThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of musculoskeletal pain with high screen-based sedentary behavior among public school teachers and whether physical activity could mitigate this relationship.MethodA sample of 246 teachers from 13 public schools were assessed (45.0 ± 10.4 years, 76.0% of women). Musculoskeletal pain was assessed using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, screen-based sedentary behavior was measured considering the sum of screen time in television, computer, and smartphone/tablet, and physical activity using the Baecke habitual physical activity questionnaire. Binary logistic regression was used to verify the associations between high screen-based sedentary behavior and musculoskeletal pain in school teachers (Model 1-unadjusted; Model 2-adjusted by age, sex, and socioeconomic status; Model 3-variables of Model 2 + adjusted by physical activity).ResultsHigh screen-based sedentary behavior was associated with pain in neck (odds ratio = 2.09; 95%confidence interval = 1.08-4.04), upper back (odds ratio = 2.21; 95%confidence interval = 1.07-4.56), and low back (odds ratio = 1.91; 95%confidence interval = 1.00-3.65). However, after inserting the variables, including physical activity, these associations were mitigated.ConclusionsHigh screen-based sedentary behavior was associated with musculoskeletal pain in public school teachers. However, this relationship was mitigated after the inclusion of confounding variables, including physical activity.     

The role of stigma and trauma in hepatitis C virus treatment in veterans: Applying the common‐sense model

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), a blood borne pathogen capable of causing severe liver disease, disproportionately affects veterans in the United States. While there are antiviral medications to treat HCV, stigma and trauma in this population may lead to avoidance of care. Those veterans who do undergo treatment have certain illness representations about HCV and its treatment. They undergo treatment even while facing stigma and trauma. The Common‐Sense Model may be useful in elucidating how such representations, when matched to an appropriate illness prototype, may inform an action plan of how to respond to HCV. An exploration of the illness representations among veterans with HCV, and the effects of stigma and trauma on these representations, may help to explain how they exercise the choice to undergo treatment and may inform interventions to encourage treatment in veterans who have yet to do so.     

Therapeutic approaches to fibromyalgia syndrome in the United Kingdom: a survey of occupational therapists and physical therapists.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study sought information from occupational therapists (OTs) and physical therapists (PTs) working in rheumatology in the UK on their usual methods of treatment and management of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS. Data were gathered by self-completion questionnaire on: work setting; referrals of FMS patients; usual treatment objectives; assessment and treatment approaches; perceived responsiveness of patients; and other perceptions of the management of FMS. Most data were in the form of frequency counts, with some ordinal scales and open responses. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 142 therapists (71% response rate), of whom 47 OTs and 39 PTs managed patients with FMS. The foremost therapeutic objective was increased functional ability for OTs, and increased exercise tolerance and general fitness for PTs. Pain reduction or management was rated as the second objective for both groups. An endurance-based exercise program and energy conservation techniques were the most frequently utilized interventions. Patients with FMS were thought to be 'moderately responsive' to physical management. Predictors of outcome were considered to be largely psychosocial, rather than physical, in nature. CONCLUSION: These data provide a preliminary profile of current practice in the management of FMS among UK therapists and indicate certain differences in approach between OTs and PTs.     

Physical and psychological needs of patients dying from colo-rectal cancer.

Sixty-one patients suffering from terminal colo-rectal cancer were interviewed in depth by trained research nurses. The nurses used a semistructured interview, a concerns checklist and the Psychiatric Assessment Schedule to determine patients' key physical complaints, their main concerns and whether or not an affective disorder was present. The interviewers' estimates of these aspects were then compared with the assessments of 48 carers and 58 general practitioners (GPs). The congruence between patients' and carers' reports was reasonable for appetite loss (77%), nausea and vomiting (75%) and pain (72%), and the rate of false positive reporting was low. However, there was much less congruence for breathlessness (48%) and pyrexia (32%). There was even less congruence between the estimates of patients' physical symptoms and GPs' perceptions. The highest congruence was for pain (42%). The congruence was low for appetite loss (8%) and breathlessness (5%). The congruence between patients' and carers' perceptions of the patients' major concerns was low, being at best 33% for patients' concerns about their physical illness. The rate of false positive reporting by carers was high. The carers' major concerns included the patients' illness (47%), the future (33%) and the emotional demands being put on them (23%). Thirteen (22%) of the 59 patients completing a full interview were suffering from an affective disorder. This had been recognized by the GP in only five cases and six patients who had a normal mood were wrongly diagnosed as being depressed. Of the carers interviewed, 22 (46%) considered symptom control had been inadequate and 23 (48%) felt they had no relief from the burden of caring or had too little help. Sixteen (33%) had recently suffered from a major depressive illness, generalized anxiety disorder or adjustment disorder. It is concluded that it is unreliable to rely on carers' proxy reports of the symptoms experienced by terminally ill patients; more accurate personal assessments are needed where possible. It is likely that this will only be achieved by ensuring that those health professionals involved in palliative care have training in the relevant assessment skills.     

Masquerade: nonspinal musculoskeletal disorders that mimic spinal conditions

Nonspinal musculoskeletal disorders frequently cause neck and back pain and thus can mimic conditions of the spine. Common mimics are rotator cuff tears, bursitis in the hip, peripheral nerve compression, and arthritis in the shoulder and hip. A thorough history and physical examination, imaging studies, and ancillary testing can usually help determine the source of pain.     

Management of work-related low back pain: a population-based survey of physical therapists

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Physical therapy often is used in the management of work-related low back pain (LBP). Little information, however, is known about the types of interventions used by physical therapists in the management of this condition. The objective of this study was to describe the interventions used by physical therapists in the treatment of workers with acute or subacute LBP, with or without radiating pain below the knee. SUBJECTS: Clinical management questionnaires for workers without and with radiating pain were returned by 190 and 139 physical therapists, respectively. METHODS: For each treatment session, therapists recorded treatment objectives, interventions, and education provided to 2 workers with LBP, 1 with radiating pain and 1 without radiating pain. RESULTS: The majority of physical therapists used stretching and strengthening exercises, spinal mobilization, soft tissue mobilization and massage, manual traction, posture correction, interferential current, ultrasound, heat, and functional activities education. With radiating pain, the majority of the therapists also used cold and the McKenzie approach. Treatment objectives pursued by the majority of the therapists were decrease of pain, increase of range of motion, increase of muscle strength (force-generating capacity of muscle), decrease of muscle tension, and worker education. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Physical therapists use an array of interventions with workers with LBP. The effectiveness of most interventions reported has not been well studied.     

An Exploration of Maitland's Concept of Pain Irritability in Patients with Low Back Pain

Abstract

Maitland's construct of musculoskeletal pain irritability is widely used by physical therapists for making decisions about the vigor of examination and treatment, but this construct has not been defined to the extent that its measurement properties can be tested. The purposes of this study were to 1) determine if physical therapists utilize low back pain (LBP) irritability judgments to make treatment decisions, 2) identify LBP characteristics appropriate for an LBP irritability construct, and 3) develop a measurement construct of LBP irritability. Physical therapists evaluated and treated 183 subjects with LBP. The therapists judged the subjects' LBP as irritable or non-irritable, and recorded treatments provided at the initial visit. A principal-components analysis (PCA) was performed on 14 patient-reported LBP characteristics to identify potential components of a measurement construct of LBP irritability. The therapists' irritability judgments were found to be associated with the types of treatments prescribed. Five dimensions of LBP irritability were identified by the PCA from the 14 LBP characteristics considered. Four of these dimensions were associated with the therapists' LBP irritability judgments. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, presence of distal symptoms, and forward bending tolerance were found to have a stronger association with the irritability judgments than the dimensions of irritability identified in this study. Validated measures of LBP characteristics in current clinical use may adequately capture Maitland's concept of irritability.     

Mechanisms-based clinical reasoning of pain by experienced musculoskeletal physiotherapists

Objective

In light of recent advances in understanding of the neurophysiological basis of pain, the use of mechanisms-based clinical reasoning strategies for pain has been advocated within physiotherapy. The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate the nature and extent of mechanisms-based clinical reasoning of pain by experienced musculoskeletal physiotherapists, in relation to three different clinical pain presentations.

Design/participants

Guided by an interpretative approach, a qualitative multiple-case studies design was used. Three videotaped patient-therapist clinical interviews were produced, each describing a different pain presentation. During and after the viewing of each of the three pain presentations, an audiotaped semi-structured interview was carried out with a purposive sample of seven experienced physiotherapists. The therapists were encouraged to verbalise their thoughts on aspects of each patient's pain presentation. All interviews were subsequently transcribed, coded and analysed.

Results

Four main categories of mechanisms-based clinical reasoning were identified. These were: (1) nociceptive; (2) peripheral neurogenic; (3) central; and (4) autonomic/sympathetic. There was some evidence to suggest that reasoning within these categories variously influenced therapists’ prognostic decision making as well as the planning of physical assessments and treatment. There was minimal evidence of reasoning according to the cognitive-affective mechanisms of pain, and no evidence of reasoning associated with motor, neuroendocrine and immune mechanisms and influences on nociception.

Conclusion

The mechanisms-based clinical reasoning of pain by the participants in this study appeared to reflect the integration of a limited understanding of the neurophysiological basis of pain into clinical decision making associated with patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Physiotherapists may benefit from continuing education in order to broaden and update their knowledge of applied pain neurophysiology.     

Management and Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Clinical Perspective

Abstract

A temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a very common problem affecting up to 33% of individuals within their lifetime. TMD is often viewed as a repetitive motion disorder of the masticatory structures and has many similarities to musculoskeletal disorders of other parts of the body. Treatment often involves similar principles as other regions as well. However, patients with TMD and concurrent cervical pain exhibit a complex symptomatic behavior that is more challenging than isolated TMD symptoms. Although routinely managed by medical and dental practitioners, TMD may be more effectively cared for when physical therapists are involved in the treatment process. Hence, a listing of situations when practitioners should consider referring TMD patients to a physical therapist can be provided to the practitioners in each physical therapist's region. This paper should assist physical therapists with evaluating, treating, insurance billing, and obtaining referrals for TMD patients.