The cost of treatment for post-herpetic neuralgia in the UK

Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) following acute shingles caused by the herpes simplex virus is a painful and often disabling condition. Treatment of the condition can involve a range of drug therapies. In addition, patients with continuing pain may make several visits to general practitioners and hospital outpatient departments. The costs of treatment for these patients may be substantial. The main objective of this study was to estimate the costs and consequences to the UK National Health Service (NHS) of the treatment of PHN following shingles, and the effect of the condition on patients' lives in terms of pain and time off usual activities such as work. The lifetime direct treatment costs of a cohort of people from onset of PHN to resolution of the disease or death were calculated. These costs were estimated from data on the type and quantity of health resources used, and the unit costs or prices of those resources. This study has shown that PHN can be a costly consequence of acute shingles. For patients attending a tertiary referral centre the lifetime cost was 770 British pounds sterling. For a 1-year incidence cohort of people with shingles in the UK, the lifetime costs of treating PHN are between 4.8 million British pounds sterling (incidence of 21 000 people) and 17.9 million British pounds sterling (incidence of 78 200 people). Efforts are needed to reduce the incidence or severity of PHN.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Famciclovir, from the bench to the patient--a comprehensive review of preclinical data

Famciclovir is converted rapidly and efficiently after oral administration to the selective antiviral compound, penciclovir. In cell culture, penciclovir is a potent inhibitor of herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus (VZV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). Phosphorylation of penciclovir and aciclovir in uninfected cells is limited, and penciclovir, like aciclovir, has minimal effect on replicating cells in culture as expected for a selective antiviral agent. Mode of action studies with VZV and HSV have shown that the phosphorylation of penciclovir in infected cells is far more efficient than for aciclovir. This compensates for differences observed between penciclovir triphosphate and aciclovir triphosphate in the inhibition of HSV and VZV DNA polymerases. Because HBV is not known to encode a thymidine kinase, a different rationale for the selective inhibition of this virus by penciclovir is required. Recent data indicate that the DNA polymerase of HBV is far more sensitive to inhibition by penciclovir triphosphate than cellular DNA polymerases, suggesting that for this virus, selectivity operates at the DNA polymerase. Penciclovir triphosphate is more stable within infected cells than aciclovir triphosphate, and consequently penciclovir has more prolonged antiviral activity than aciclovir. Similarly, famciclovir is more effective than aciclovir or valaciclovir in suppressing HSV replication when given at a lower dosing frequency in certain animal models. These preclinical properties have helped to provide the foundation for the famciclovir clinical programme.     

Famciclovir as an antiviral agent for a patient with acute renal failure

Case Acyclovir is a widely administered medication for viral infection but is well known for its nephrotoxicity. To date, few studies regarding the safety of alternative antiviral agents have been reported. This study reports the case of a patient with renal dysfunction who suffers from acute herpes zoster (shingles) on her back. While renal function deteriorated with the use of acyclovir, the patient’s symptoms improved and baseline renal function recovered when she was treated with famciclovir. Conclusions Famciclovir could be taken as a first-line antiviral agent for patients with acute renal failure.     

Cardiovascular prophylaxis with aspirin: costs of supply and management of upper gastrointestinal and renal toxicity

AIMS: To determine the cost to the NHS of prescribed low-dose aspirin. METHODS: This was a population based observational cohort study. Patients from Tayside Scotland (17 244 new users of dispensed aspirin each with 10 matched comparators) were included. A pragmatic analysis totalled costs from the start to end of the study and compared these with a matched cohort of aspirin nonusers to estimate excess costs. Fastidious analyses were done of subjects with no prior history of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) or renal disease where the cost that occurred during aspirin exposure, the 30 days following aspirin exposure and subsequent nonexposure was calculated adjusting for risk factors in each period. RESULTS: Subjects took aspirin for only 1.18 of the 2.53 years follow-up (47% compliance). Aspirin use cost an additional 49.86 UK pounds per year (pragmatic analysis) made up of 1.96 UK pounds for aspirin tablets (4%), 5.49 UK pounds for dispensing costs (11%), 24.60 UK pounds for UGI complications (49%) and 17.81 UK pounds for renal complications (36%). The costs for managing complications were substantially lower in the fastidious analysis (2.66 UK pounds for UGI complications and 2.92 UK pounds for renal complications). Assuming that the antiplatelet trial meta-analysis is an accurate assessment of the benefits of aspirin, the costs of preventing one vascular event lay between 62 500 UK pounds (primary prevention, pragmatic analysis) and 867 UK pounds (secondary prevention, fastidious analysis). These costs may be underestimates due to the low compliance observed. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with aspirin was poor. Serious adverse events were uncommon but despite this aspirin cost the NHS between 6 and 25 times the cost of aspirin tablets due to dispensing costs and the cost of managing adverse effects.     

Costs of detection and treatment of cervical cancer, cervical dysplasia and genital warts in the UK

OBJECTIVE: Infection with human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer (CC) and genital warts (GW). HPV vaccination studies have shown excellent efficacy against HPV-induced lesions. To assess the cost-effectiveness of a HPV quadrivalent (6, 11, 16 and 18) vaccine it is necessary to estimate the costs of managing current levels of HPV-related diseases. This study estimates the annual 2003 expenditures in the UK for CC screening, follow-up of abnormal findings, CC treatment and GW treatment. DESIGN AND METHODS: CC screening programmes provided the annual number of screening tests, their results and use of colposcopy procedures in women with abnormal findings. Incident CC cases and hospital admissions for CC in 2003 were used to estimate CC costs. Health Protection Agency data provided the annual number of new, recurrent or persistent cases of GW treated in Genitourinary Medicine (GUM) clinics. Treatment patterns for managing GW were estimated by GUM clinicians. The annual physician visits, tests, procedures, hospital admissions and topical genital wart medications were costed to estimate the total annual expenditures for CC and GW. RESULTS: There were 4.8 million screening tests and 230 303 colposcopy procedures. Estimated costs for screening, management of abnormal and inadequate findings were 138.5 million pounds sterlings. Annual management costs for incident and prevalent CC cases were 46.8 million pounds sterlings. There were an estimated 76 457 incident and 55 657 recurrent/persistent GW cases in 2003. The costs for managing these cases were approximately 22.4 million pounds sterlings. Total annual estimated costs for CC screening, management and treatment of GW were 208 million pounds sterlings and ranged from 186.9 pounds sterlings to 214 million pounds sterlings based upon sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The direct medical costs for the NHS associated with detection and management of CC, cervical dysplasia and treatment of GW in the UK are substantial. These medical costs are invaluable for future cost-effectiveness analyses of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine programme.     

The cost effectiveness of tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin: a 10-year model of renal transplantation outcomes

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In 1983, the launch of cyclosporin was a significant clinical advance for organ transplant recipients. Subsequent drug research led to further advances with the introduction of cyclosporin microemulsion (cyclosporin ME) and tacrolimus. This paper presents the results from a long-term model comparing the clinical and economic outcomes associated with cyclosporin ME and tacrolimus immunosuppression for the prevention of graft rejection following renal transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: A model was developed to project the costs and outcomes over a 10-year period following transplantation. The model was based on the results of a prospective, randomised study of 179 renal transplantation recipients receiving either cyclosporin ME or tacrolimus, which was conducted by the Welsh Transplantation Research Group (median follow-up: 2.7 years). METHODS: The short-term costs and outcomes were the averages from the actual head-to-head trial data. From this, the long-term costs and outcomes were extrapolated based on the rate of change in patient and graft survival at 3, 5 and 10 years post transplant, as reported in the 1995 United Kingdom Transplant Support Service Authority Renal Transplant Audit. PERSPECTIVE AND YEAR OF COST DATA: The analysis was conducted from the perspective of a UK transplant unit. Costs were at 1999 prices (pounds sterling 1 = dollars US 1.42 = Euro 1.5) and costs and outcomes were discounted at 6% and 1.5%, respectively. RESULTS: The model estimated that 10 years after transplantation, the proportion of patients surviving was 56% of the cyclosporin ME cohort and 64% of the tacrolimus cohort. The cumulative cost of maintenance therapy at 10 years was pounds sterling 23204 per patient maintained on cyclosporin ME versus pounds sterling 23803 per patient on tacrolimus. The cost per survivor at 10 years was pounds sterling 37000 (tacrolimus) versus pounds sterling 41000 (cyclosporin ME) and the cost per patient with a functioning graft was pounds sterling 39000 versus pounds sterling 45000. A Monte Carlo simulation of the model (10000 simulations) gave an average cost at 10 years of pounds sterling 23279 (SD pounds sterling 3457) for cyclosporin ME and pounds sterling 22841 (SD pounds sterling 3590) for tacrolimus. A (second order) probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also performed. The average cost at 10 years from a simulated cohort of 1000 was pounds sterling 23473 (SD pounds sterling 2154) for cyclosporin ME and pounds sterling 24087 (SD pounds sterling 2025) for tacrolimus. CONCLUSION: Renal transplant recipients maintained on tacrolimus have better short- and long-term outcomes than patients maintained on cyclosporin ME. The long-term use of tacrolimus is a more cost-effective solution in terms of the number of survivors, patients with a functioning graft and rejection-free patients.     

Economic analysis of filgrastim use for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in the UK: a comparison of collection methods of resource use data

BACKGROUND: A clinical trial of patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) showed that haematopoietic support with filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, G-CSF) following induction and consolidation chemotherapy accelerated recovery from neutropenia. The clinical benefits included reductions in infections, anti-infective therapy and length of hospital stay. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this economic analysis is 2-fold. First, it aims to determine if the observed clinical benefits from the use of filgrastim would lead to cost savings from the perspective of a healthcare institution in the UK. Second, the analysis compares the results of two methods on collection of resource use data. DESIGN: A retrospective cost-minimisation analysis was undertaken based on the clinical results of all UK patients enrolled in the trial. Two cost models were developed: a model based only on the medical resource use collected in the case report forms (the CRF model); and a model based on all medical resources collected from patient medical files (the PF Model). Treatment costs of AML between filgrastim and the placebo arm were compared for the first induction cycle as well as the first induction and the first consolidation cycles combined. Results from the two models were compared. SETTING AND PATIENTS: The CRF model was applied to two samples of patients: all UK patients (n = 82) and patients enrolled at one centre [the Manchester Royal Infirmary (MRI) (n = 30)], whereas the PF model was applied to the MRI patient sample only. RESULTS: For all UK patients, using the CRF model, the filgrastim-treated arm produced cost savings of 747 pounds sterling (9.0%) and 2135 pounds sterling (14.4%) [1998 values] per patient in the first induction cycle and in the induction and consolidation cycles combined, respectively. For the patients at MRI the CRF model resulted in cost savings with filgrastim of 177 pounds sterling (2.2%) and 414 pounds sterling (3.2%) per patient respectively. Using the PF model the savings at MRI were 910 pounds sterling (8.6%) and 1285 pounds sterling (8.0%) per patient, respectively. CONCLUSION: Use of filgrastim in the treatment of AML in the UK may result in net cost savings. A retrospective analysis using total resources obtained through patient files produced higher cost savings estimates than that obtained by resources noted in the CRFs. The models based on PF resource data may be more reliable because they are more comprehensive. However, the cost estimates in this study may have been impacted by sample size, site characteristics, disease and treatment settings. Therefore, further evaluation on the methods for collecting resource use data in larger, multicentred studies is warranted.     

Cost effectiveness of olanzapine in prevention of affective episodes in bipolar disorder in the United Kingdom

This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of olanzapine compared with lithium as maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder (BP1) in the UK. A Markov model was developed to assess costs and outcomes from the perspective of the UK National Health Service over a 1-year period. Patients enter the model after stabilization of a manic episode and are then treated with olanzapine or lithium. Using the findings of a recent randomized clinical trial, the model considers the monthly risk of manic or depressive episodes and of dropping out from allocated therapy. health care resources associated with acute episodes were derived primarily from a recent UK chart review. Costs of maintenance therapy and monitoring were also considered. Key factors influencing cost effectiveness were identified and included in a stochastic sensitivity analysis. The model estimated that, compared to lithium, olanzapine significantly reduced the annual number of acute mood episodes per patient from 0.81 to 0.58 (difference -0.23; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.12). Per patient average annual care costs fell by 799 UK pounds (95% CI: - 1,824 UK pounds, 59 UK pounds) driven by reduced inpatient days--but the cost difference was not statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis found the results to be robust to plausible variation in the model's parameters. The model estimated that using olanzapine instead of lithium as maintenance therapy for BP1 would significantly reduce the rate of acute mood events resulting in reduced hospital costs. Based on available evidence, there is a high likelihood that olanzapine would reduce costs of care compared to lithium.     

A probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram, generic citalopram and venlafaxine as a first-line treatment of major depressive disorder in the UK

OBJECTIVES: To determine if escitalopram is cost-effective in the UK when compared with venlafaxine and generic citalopram in primary care treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). METHODS: A pre-existing cost-effectiveness model was adapted to reflect the practice in the UK. Adult patients (> 18 years) with MDD [baseline scores >/= 18 and 相似文献   

Valaciclovir: a review of its use in the management of herpes zoster

Varicella zoster virus (VZV), the pathogen responsible for herpes zoster, belongs to the herpesvirus family and is sensitive to the antiviral drug aciclovir. However, the low oral bioavailability of aciclovir has to some extent limited its efficacy in the treatment of herpes zoster and has prompted the development of the more readily absorbed oral prodrug valaciclovir. In a large comparative study valaciclovir, (1000 mg 3 times daily for 7 days) was at least as effective as aciclovir (800 mg 5 times daily for 7 days) in controlling the symptoms of acute herpes zoster. Importantly, valaciclovir alleviated zoster-associated pain and postherpetic neuralgia significantly faster than aciclovir. A 14-day regimen of valaciclovir showed no significant advantage over the 7-day regimen. A smaller trial in Japanese patients focusing primarily on the cutaneous (rash) signs of herpes zoster confirmed the similar efficacy of valaciclovir and aciclovir in the 7-day regimen. This study did not follow all patients for a formal analysis of postherpetic neuralgia. Valaciclovir and aciclovir demonstrated similar efficacy for the control of cutaneous lesions and ocular complications in patients with zoster ophthalmicus. Preliminary results of a large controlled trial indicate that valaciclovir 1000 mg 3 times daily and famciclovir (the prodrug of penciclovir) 500 mg 3 times daily are of similar efficacy in speeding resolution of acute herpes zoster rash and shortening the duration of postherpetic neuralgia. Starting treatment later than 72 hours after rash onset did not significantly reduce the beneficial effect of valaciclovir on duration of zoster-associated pain (a continuum of pain that encompasses both acute pain and postherpetic neuralgia) in a large observational study, suggesting that valaciclovir might be effective when given later than previously thought. However, valaciclovir should ideally be given as soon as possible after symptoms appear. With the recommended regimen for the treatment of herpes zoster (1000 mg 3 times daily for 7 days) valaciclovir was well tolerated, with nausea and headache being the most commonly reported adverse events. The adverse events profile of the agent was similar to that seen with aciclovir or famciclovir. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of valaciclovir for the treatment of herpes zoster has been confirmed and extended by follow-up studies in herpes zoster ophthalmicus, in Japanese patients, and in the wider primary care setting. Valaciclovir is at least equivalent to, and better in certain parameters than, aciclovir and appears to have similar efficacy to famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily. Valaciclovir is a well tolerated first-line therapy with an established place in the treatment of immunocompetent patients with herpes zoster.     

Ariflo (SmithKline Beecham plc)

Ariflo (SB-207499) is a phosphodiesterase (PDE)4 inhibitor under development by SmithKline Beecham and in phase III and II clinical trials as a potential treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, respectively [284490]. It has commenced phase II trials as a treatment for bronchial asthma in Japan [248285,300145]. In February 1999, Merrill Lynch predicted that Ariflo would be launched by the end of 2000 or early 2001 with first year sales of UK pounds sterling 25 million rising to UK pounds sterling 175 million in 2003 [300257,314372]. In February 1999 ABN Amro predicted sales of UK pounds sterling 52 million in 2001 rising to UK pounds sterling 254 million in 2005 [317577,328676].     

Health economic impact of olopatadine compared to branded and generic sodium cromoglycate in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis in the UK

OBJECTIVE: This study estimated the health economic impact of olopatadine (Opatanol) compared to branded cromoglycate (Opticrom) and generic sodium cromoglycate in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a modelling study performed from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A decision model was constructed depicting the management of SAC sufferers who are 4 years of age or above over a typical allergy season of 4 months and considers the decision by a GP to initially treat a patient with olopatadine, branded or generic cromoglycate. The analysis assumed both drugs to be equally effective. Consequently, a cost-minimisation analysis was performed to identify the least costly alternative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Starting treatment with olopatadine is expected to lead to a healthcare cost of 92 pounds sterling (95% CI: 46 pounds sterling; 150 pounds sterling) over 4 months compared to 109 pounds sterling (95% CI: 65 pounds sterling; 166 pounds sterling) with branded cromoglycate and 95 pounds sterling (95% CI: 51 pounds sterling; 152 pounds sterling) with generic cromoglycate, resulting in a 16% and 3% reduction in healthcare costs respectively over 4 months of treatment. This cost-difference is primarily due to fewer GP visits among olopatadine-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Use of olopatadine instead of branded or generic cromoglycate affords an economic benefit to the NHS. Hence, within the limitations of the model, olopatadine is the preferred first-line treatment for use in SAC sufferers, since it is expected to lead to fewer GP visits, thereby releasing healthcare resources for alternative use.     

Viral diseases of the skin: diagnosis and antiviral treatment

Viral diseases in children can present with characteristic mucocutaneous manifestations. This article focuses, from a practical clinical point of view, on the laboratory and clinical diagnoses, and treatment of pediatric dermatological diseases that have specific antiviral therapies: herpes virus infections (including varicella), papillomavirus infections and molluscum contagiosum. Special issues, such as viral infections in pregnancy, therapy of viral infections in immunosuppressed children, as well as special problems associated with the epidemiology of genital herpes and papillomavirus infections in adolescents are discussed. The antivirals discussed in detail include: aciclovir, valaciclovir, famciclovir, penciclovir, cidofovir, foscarnet and the immune response modulator, imiquimod. Since these antiviral drugs generally have not been evaluated in children, caution should be exercised with their usage.     

Cost-utility analysis in a UK setting of self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in type 2 diabetes patients has been shown in meta-analyses of randomized trials to improve HbA(1c) by approximately 0.4% when compared to no SMBG. However, the cost of testing supplies is high, improvements in health utility due to improved glycaemic control may be possible and cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated. METHODS: A peer-reviewed validated model projected improvements in lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), long-term costs and cost-effectiveness of SMBG versus no SMBG. Markov/Monte Carlo modelling simulated the progression of complications (cardiovascular, neuropathy, renal and eye disease). Transition probabilities and HbA(1c)-dependent adjustments came from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and other major studies. Effects of SMBG on HbA(1c) came from clinical studies, meta-analyses and population studies, but can only be considered 'moderate' levels of evidence. Costs of complications were retrieved from published sources. Direct costs of diabetes complications and SMBG were projected over patient lifetimes from a UK National Health Service perspective. Outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Depending on the type of diabetes treatment (diet and exercise/oral medications/insulin), improvements in glycaemic control with SMBG improved discounted QALYs anywhere from 0.165 to 0.255 years, with increased total costs of 1013 pounds sterlings- 2564 pounds sterlings/patient, giving incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 4508 pounds sterlings: 15,515 pounds sterlings/QALY gained, well within current UK willingness-to-pay limits. Results were robust under a wide range of plausible assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the moderate level of clinical evidence available to date, improvements in glycaemic control with interventions, including SMBG, can improve patient outcomes, with acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios in the UK setting.     

Cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (Stalevo) compared to standard care in UK Parkinson's disease patients with wearing-off

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE;Stalevo), in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end-of-dose motor fluctuations (wearing-off). LCE, with or without other antiparkinsonian medications, was compared to UK standard care, comprising traditional levodopa/ dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) with other antiparkinsonian medications (e.g. selegiline or dopamine agonists) added as needed. The costs and outcomes of both treatments were projected over a period of 10 years from the perspective (a) of society as a whole and (b) of the UK National Health Service (NHS). Sensitivity analyses, including second-order Monte Carlo simulations, were performed to assess the confidence level of the primary results. RESULTS: Treatment with LCE produced an average gain of +1.04 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient (2.57 vs. 1.53) in the base-case analysis (discount rate 3.5%). This gain was accompanied by a reduction in the total 10-year direct cost of care to society of 10198 pounds per patient ( approximately E14800). From the societal perspective, therefore, LCE was dominant, producing better clinical outcomes with lower costs. This dominance was reiterated in all sensitivity analyses of society-focused analysis, including a shortening of the time-frame to 5 years.Although treatment with LCE resulted in an increase in direct costs per patient of 3239 pounds (25756 pounds versus 22517 pounds) to the NHS over the 10-year period analysed, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of LCE was only 3105 pounds per QALY gained (approximately E4500). All ICERs to the NHS remained below 3800 pounds per QALY gained in univariate sensitivity analyses applying different discount rates. When a shorter, 5-year, time-horizon was analysed, the NHS-related ICER for LCE was 6526 pounds per QALY gained. All these ICERs are within the range usually considered to indicate acceptable or highly acceptable cost effectiveness (defined as < 30000 pounds per QALY gained).The results of the Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the likelihood of LCE being either 'dominant' or more effective at an 'acceptable cost' from either the societal or the NHS perspective was high, exceeding 96% in the base-case sensitivity analysis, and was 93% even when all the uncertainties associated with the model were taken into consideration simultaneously. In particular, compared to standard care, the probability that LCE would provide better outcomes at a lower cost to society as a whole was 77% in the base-case sensitivity analysis and 72% in the scenario involving the highest degree of uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: In the UK the use of LCE to treat PD patients with wearing-off is beneficial to individual patients and likely to offer money savings to society as a whole, compared with UK standard therapy. The added cost of the medication itself is exceeded by the savings made in other direct costs of PD, mainly those relating to social care or PD-related private expenditures.     

The cost-effectiveness of mirtazapine versus paroxetine in treating people with depression in primary care

Currently, there are no data available comparing cost-effectiveness of two antidepressants in the primary care setting in the UK. Alongside a randomized, double-blind, 24-week study of mirtazapine and paroxetine, data were prospectively collected on patients' use of hospital and non-hospital services and days off work. Costs were estimated in each treatment arm from National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspectives, and were compared with selected outcome measures (numbers of 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (17-HAMD) responders and changes in Quality of Life in Depression Scale scores between baseline and 24-week endpoint) to explore and compare relative cost-effectiveness. Mirtazapine treatment resulted in a statistically significantly greater improvement in quality of life than paroxetine at endpoint (P=0.021). Although the 17-HAMD response rates were higher for the mirtazapine users at endpoint, the difference (7%) was not statistically significant (P=0.31). However, mean total societal costs per patient were 375 pounds less with mirtazapine (1850 pounds) compared to paroxetine (2225 pounds; P=0.32). Mean total NHS costs per patient were also lower (120 pounds) with mirtazapine (1408 pounds) compared to paroxetine (1528 pounds). The advantage for mirtazapine remained present on all variables analysed after performing sensitivity analyses. The results suggest that mirtazapine may be a cost-effective treatment choice compared to paroxetine for depression in a primary care setting.     

Potential costs and effects of the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease in the UK

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the costs and effect of implementing the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) in the UK. DESIGN: Decision trees were built on the results from randomised controlled trials on improving coronary revascularisation. All costs were presented in UK pounds (1997 values). PATIENTS: Each year 6600 new patients with CHD are expected to require revascularisation in the UK. INTERVENTIONS: The new patients would be equally divided into those undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and those undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) i.e., percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PCTA). PTCA could be administered with or without abciximab (a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist), stent, or stent plus abciximab (stent+). RESULTS: CABG/stent alone has an incremental cost of more than 115,489 pounds per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained compared with CABG/ PTCA+. This high incremental cost is not attractive because if CABG/ stent would be added to abciximab (CABG/stent+) its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio would be 2529 pounds per extra QALY compared with CABG/stent. Therefore, the debate should not be limited to the issue of stents but it should focus on the need for administering abciximab in addition to stent. The 5-year direct costs of implementing such a strategy in the UK is expected to be 50.6 million pounds (1997 values). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab and probably any glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists should be added to any PCI, especially if stents are used.     

The economics of an intensive education programme for asthmatic patients: a prospective controlled trial

The costs and benefits of a planned patient education programme for patients with asthma were evaluated in a controlled trial. The patient education group received a planned patient education programme, performed by a physician, a pharmacist and a nurse over a 6-month period. Changes in the use of resources, productive output and in health status were measured for the patient education group and the control group. The total cost for planning, implementation and evaluation of the programme was 14074 British pounds sterling. The patient education group increased its contacts to general practitioners and the extra costs totalled 252 British pounds sterling. The increased costs of drugs used by the patient education group in the 6-month period was 2313 British pounds sterling compared with costs in the control group. The number of days lost through sickness decreased in the patient education group, corresponding to a 4528 British pounds sterling saving of otherwise lost earnings. The quality of life increased in the patient education group by 3.2 points on the Psychosomatic Discomfort Scale (2.9%). Health status increased by 38.9%. The study shows that the patient education programme has a positive clinical effect on the patient's quality of life and health status. The economic consequences of the implementation programme depend on the specific setup of the local healthcare system, where the programme is applied.