Prevalence of Masked Hypertension in Subjects Treated with Antihypertensive Drugs as Assessed by Morning versus Evening Home Blood Pressure Measurements: the J-HOME study

To investigate the relationship between morning and evening home blood pressure (BP) measurements to make a diagnosis of masked hypertension, we collected information on the characteristics of 3,303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive medication in Japan using a physician, self-administered questionnaire. All patients were asked to measure their home BP once every morning and once every evening for two weeks. Morning and evening home BP values of each patient were defined as the average of all morning and all evening home BP values, respectively. The mean BP values of all study subjects were 142.8/80.6 mmHg for office BP, 139.8/81.8 mmHg for morning home BP, 133.7/76.9 mmHg for evening home BP, and 136.8/79.3 mmHg for the average of the morning and evening home BPs. Masked hypertension was defined as an office BP < 140/90 mmHg and a home BP > or = 135/85 mmHg. The prevalence of masked hypertension diagnosed using morning home BP (23.1%) was higher than that diagnosed by evening home BP (14.7%); the prevalence was 19.0% when diagnosed using the average of the morning and evening home BPs. Among the 1,386 patients with a normal office BP, the diagnosis of masked hypertension based on morning and evening home BP values differed in 28.8% of patients for systolic BP and 20.9% for diastolic BP (kappa coefficient = 0.43). The present study showed that the prevalence of masked hypertension was underestimated when the diagnosis of masked hypertension was made on the basis of evening home BP.     

Rate of morning increase in blood pressure is elevated in hypertensives

BACKGROUND: We applied a new logistic curve fitting procedure to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) recordings to determine whether the rate of increase in systolic (SBP), mean (MBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) in the morning is related to the level of BP in subjects. METHODS: The rate of transition in the morning and evening period was determined using a six-parameter double-logistic equation applied to 528 ABP recordings from a cardiovascular risk assessment clinic. Based on daytime BP (MBP, SBP, or DBP), the upper quartile (UQ, n = 132) and lower quartile (LQ) were compared. RESULTS: Subjects in the UQ of daytime MBP were hypertensive and showed greater day-night differences compared to normotensive subjects in the LQ (29 +/- 1 mm Hg for MBP compared to 20 +/- 1 mm Hg). The rate of morning increase in SBP and DBP was 42% and 30% greater in UQ subjects compared to the LQ subjects (P < .05). The rates of evening decrease in all BPs were 69% to 84% greater in the subjects in the UQ. Similar results were obtained if subjects were divided according to daytime SBP or DBP. The rate of morning increase in MBP was correlated with daytime BP, but not night-time or 24 h MBP. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of morning increase in BP is greater in those subjects with the highest daytime BP. The exaggerated rate of morning increase in BP in this group, which were all hypertensive, may also be important for greater cardiovascular risk.     

Prevalence of Masked Hypertension in Subjects Treated with Antihypertensive Drugs as Assessed by Morning versus Evening Home Blood Pressure Measurements: The J-HOME Study

To investigate the relationship between morning and evening home blood pressure (BP) measurements to make a diagnosis of masked hypertension, we collected information on the characteristics of 3,303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive medication in Japan using a physician, self-administered questionnaire. All patients were asked to measure their home BP once every morning and once every evening for two weeks. Morning and evening home BP values of each patient were defined as the average of all morning and all evening home BP values, respectively. The mean BP values of all study subjects were 142.8/80.6 mmHg for office BP, 139.8/81.8 mmHg for morning home BP, 133.7/76.9 mmHg for evening home BP, and 136.8/79.3 mmHg for the average of the morning and evening home BPs. Masked hypertension was defined as an office BP < 140/90 mmHg and a home BP ≥ 135/85 mmHg. The prevalence of masked hypertension diagnosed using morning home BP (23.1%) was higher than that diagnosed by evening home BP (14.7%); the prevalence was 19.0% when diagnosed using the average of the morning and evening home BPs. Among the 1,386 patients with a normal office BP, the diagnosis of masked hypertension based on morning and evening home BP values differed in 28.8% of patients for systolic BP and 20.9% for diastolic BP (kappa coefficient = 0.43). The present study showed that the prevalence of masked hypertension was underestimated when the diagnosis of masked hypertension was made on the basis of evening home BP.     

Relationship between aortic stiffness and cardiovascular risk factors in a population of normotensives, white-coat normotensives, white-coat hypertensives, sustained hypertensives and diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and office and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and other cardiovascular risk factors and to determine the discriminatory value of PWV in a large population including normotensive subjects (NT), white-coat normotensives (masked hypertension) (WCNT), and white-coat hypertensives (WCHT) compared to a group of treated and untreated hypertensive patients. METHODS: The study population included a total of 688 subjects aged from 18 to 80 years, with no previous cardiovascular events, who underwent 24 h ABP monitoring, biochemical evaluation and determination of PWV and left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Subjects were classified as true normotensives (NT, n=132; normal office and ABP values), WCNT (n=39; office BP < 140/90 and daytime BP > or =135 or > or =85 mmHg), WCHT (n=87; office BP > or =140 or > or =90 and daytime BP < 135/85 mmHg). Untreated (UT-HT, n=154) and treated (T-HT, n=171) hypertensive patients and type 2 diabetic patients (DM, n=102) were also studied. RESULTS: Values of PWV (m/s) in all groups were, in ascending order: NT (8.9 +/- 0.2) < WCHT (9.9 +/- 0.2) < T-HT (11.4 +/- 0.2) = WCNT (11.5 +/- 0.4) < UT-HT (11.9 +/- 0.3) < DM (12.6 +/- 0.4) (ANOVA, p = 0.043), and of LVMI (g/m2): NT (59 +/- 2) = WCHT (63 +/- 2) < WCNT (73 +/- 3) = T-HT (75 +/- 3) = UT-HT (77 +/- 3) < DM (84 +/- 4) (ANOVA, p < 0.05). The percentage of subjects with PWV values below the median (10.7 m/s) was higher (p < 0.02) in NT (81.8%) and WCHT (72.6%) than in UT-HT (49.2%), T-HT (43.6%), WCNT (47.6%) and DM (27.7%). In multiple regression analysis, taking PWV as the dependent variable, age (all groups), 24h systolic BP (UT-HT, T-HT, WCNT and DM) and 24h diastolic BP (NT and WCHT) were the variables that independently influenced the PWV value. CONCLUSIONS: Higher values of PWV occur in clinical situations associated with higher cardiovascular risk. This is in agreement with risk stratification based on ABP values but not on office BP values. Lower PWV and LVMI values occur in NT and WCHT subjects, supporting a low cardiovascular risk in these groups. By contrast, higher PWV values were associated with higher ABP values in DM, hypertensive patients and white-coat normotensives, i.e. clinical situations that are associated with higher cardiovascular risk, who in the present study also exhibited higher LVMI than subjects with normal ABP values.     

Prevalence and mechanism of masked hypertension: the ol'mesures survey

RATIONALE: Masked hypertension (MH) and uncontrolled hypertension (UCH) have both bad prognosis. The influence of measurement circumstances on MH prevalence and reproducibility are little known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and reproducibility of MH after excluding confusing factors [method and time of blood pressure (BP) measurement, antihypertensive treatment] by a standardization procedure. METHODS: 2189 hypertensive patients (61+/- 12 years, men 57%) having been treated in monotherapy by an angiotensin II receptor inhibitor for at least 8 weeks Were evaluated in a French multicenter prospective observational survey. Three BP successive office measurements were performed by the GPs during 2 visits (V) at similar times 13 +/- 9 days apart (BP: V1 149 +/- 19 / 85 +/- 11 mmHg, V2 145 +/- 19/83 +/- 11 mmHg) and home BP self-measurements (HBPM) were performed morning and evening for 3 consecutive days (HBPM morning + evening : n=18 +/- 1; 142 +/- 16/81 +/- 9 mmHg) and at the time of the visit (daytime HBPM: n=9 +/- 1; 140 +/- 16/80 +/- 10 mmHg) by the patients (Omron-705CP). RESULTS: [table: see text]. CONCLUSION: the observed MH prevalence is similar to previous published studies and is independent of: treatment, BP measurement methods, measurements frequency and HBPM time but it depends on office BP values. Consequently, its reproducibility is directly dependent of the quality of office BP measurements.     

Blood pressure control in a hypertension hospital clinic.

OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate the prevalence of clinic blood pressure (BP) control (BP < or = 140/90 mm Hg) in a representative sample of treated hypertensive patients followed in our hypertension clinic. Second, to assess in a subgroup of these patients: (a) the proportion of BP control with both clinic blood pressure (CBP < or =140/90 mm Hg) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) (< or =132/85 mm Hg) criteria, and (b) the prevalence of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (left ventricular mass index, LVMI>125 g/m2 in men and >110 g/m2 in women). DESIGN AND METHODS: Seven hundred consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension centre clinic during a period of 6 months and who had regularly been followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. BP was taken in the clinic by a doctor using a mercury sphygmomanometer with the participants seated. Seventy-four patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics to the entire population of participants underwent complete echocardiographic examination and 24 h ABP monitoring. RESULTS: During follow-up, 352 of the treated patients had clinic BP < or =140/90 mm Hg, 198< or =160/95 mm Hg and 150>160/95 mm Hg, indicating that BP control was satisfactory in 50.3%, borderline in 28.3% and unsatisfactory in 21.4% of the cases. In the subgroup of 74 patients, the proportion of individuals with satisfactory clinic BP control (CBP< or =140/90 mm Hg) was higher (50.0 versus 33.6%) than with satisfactory ABP control (daytime ABP values < or =132/85 mm Hg). LVH was found in 21 of the 74 patients (28.3%): 12 of them had unsatisfactory CBP control and 19 had unsatisfactory ABP control. LVMI did not correlate with CBP values but only with ABP values (mean 24 h systolic r = 0.47, diastolic r = 0.40, P<0.001; mean daytime systolic r = 0.45, mean daytime diastolic r = 0.39, P<0.001; mean night-time systolic r = 0.38, mean night-time diastolic r = 0.38, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that hypertensive patients managed in a hypertension centre clinic have satisfactory CBP control in 50% of cases, but this rate seems to over-estimate the effective BP control during daily life. A large fraction of patients show persistence of LVH and this evidence of organ damage almost entirely concerns individuals with poor ABP control.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after 1 year on valsartan or amlodipine-based treatment: a VALUE substudy

OBJECTIVE: The ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring substudy of the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial was carried out in a subset of patients from USA, Italy and Denmark. ABP was measured after 1 year in the trial, with the aim of evaluating comparability of ABP levels on valsartan (VAL) and amlodipine (AML)-based regimens. METHODS: ABP was measured every 20 min during a 25-h period after morning administration of medicine; 659 patients were available for intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Office blood pressure (BP) differences were smaller than in the main study and mean ABP levels also showed only minor differences between the two regimens (VAL, 132.5/74.8 mmHg; AML, 131.5/75.2 mmHg). However, during the first 7 h after dosing, ABP was lower on VAL, whereas AML exerted a significantly stronger effect during the last 4 h of the dosing interval--possibly influencing the differences in office BP found in the main study. Mean heart rate (HR) was higher on AML (72.3 bpm) than on VAL (70.5 bpm) (P = 0.013), suggesting a sustained difference in sympathetic activation. Correlation analysis showed a close relationship between treated ABP levels and the occurrence of combined cardiovascular endpoints--superior to the relationship to office BP. CONCLUSIONS: In these elderly high-risk patients, diastolic ABP levels tended to be less predictive than systolic, and daytime less predictive than night-time for all cardiovascular endpoints. The findings underline the importance of ABP substudies in comparative trials for elucidating significant differences in pharmacodynamics, and stresses the superior predictive power of ABP.     

Predictors of controlled ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients with uncontrolled office blood pressure.

Although some treated hypertensive patients have controlled 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) despite their uncontrolled office blood pressure (BP), the factors relating to the control of 24-h ABP remain unknown. We conducted a study to assess 24-h ABP and its association with other cardiovascular risk factors, including echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), in elderly hypertensive patients (n =41) with uncontrolled office BP (>140/90 mmHg) during long-term medication. Although a majority of the patients had isolated elevation of office systolic BP (SBP), there was no significant relationship between office SBP and 24-h SBP, and about half of the patients had controlled 24-h ABP (125+/-8/69+/-6 mmHg). Patients with controlled 24-h ABP (125+/-8/69+/-6 mmHg) had similar office BP (150+/-6/77+/-5 vs. 150+/-7/79+/-7 mmHg), but lower left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (123+/-34 vs. 156+/-34 g/m(2)) and body mass index (BMI) (24.4+/-2.1 vs. 26.4+/-3.6 kg/m(2)) compared with those with uncontrolled 24-h ABP (149+/-13/78+/-7 mmHg). Multivariate analysis showed that LVMI and BMI were independently associated with controlled 24-h ABP, and the control status of 24-h ABP was highly dependent on the presence of LVH and obesity. Therefore, absence of LVH and obesity may be useful for predicting the level of control of 24-h ABP in treated patients whose office BP is uncontrolled without ABP measurements.     

Blood pressure on arising, morning blood pressure surge and blood pressure variability in white coat hypertensives and in matched normotensives and sustained hypertensives.

INTRODUCTION: It is still controversial whether subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCHT) exhibit higher cardiovascular risk compared to normotensive subjects (NT). In subjects with WCHT it is not known whether the abnormal blood pressure (BP) reaction in the office also occurs at other times of day, particularly on arising and immediately after waking, i.e. the times at which the majority of cardiovascular events are reported to occur. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To evaluate with 24h ambulatory BP measurement the values of morning BP surge, BP on arising and BP variability in subjects with WCHT in comparison with age-, gender- and weight-matched normotensives (BP) and untreated sustained hypertensives (BP). RESULTS: Groups of BP, WCHT and BP were matched for age, gender and body weight: BP: n=69, age 49 +/- 7 years, 54 % female, BMI 26 +/- 1, casual BP 126/79 +/- 5/4 mmHg, daytime BP 124/80 +/- 6/6 mmHg; WCHT: n=74, age 52 +/- 8 years, 57% female, BMI 26 +/- 2, casual BP 152/95 +/- 7/7 mmHg, daytime BP 126/80 +/- 5/6 mmHg; HT: n=79, age 53 +/- 7 years, 56% female, BMI 27 +/- 2, casual BP 154/97 +/- 9/8 mmHg, daytime BP 143/89 +/- 12/10 mmHg. Of the three groups, subjects with WCHT exhibited BP on arising (121/81 +/- 13/8 mmHg) similar to that of NTs (120/80 +/- 13/9 mmHg, NS), both significantly lower than that of HTs (137/92 +/- 17/10 mmHg, p < 0.01), suggesting the absence of an alerting BP reaction in WCHT at that time. By contrast, subjects with WCHT showed higher values of systolic morning BP surge vs. NTs (25 +/- 10 vs. 22 +/- 11 mmHg, p < 0.05), both lower than that observed in hypertensives (33 +/- 11 mmHg, p < 0.01 vs. NT and WCHT) and greater daytime variability (systolic BP standard variation), i.e. 12 2 vs. 10 +/- 2 mmHg, p < 0.05, both lower than that observed in hypertensives (14 +/- 3 mmHg, p < 0.01 vs. NT and WCHT). CONCLUSIONS: Although subjects with WCHT did not show any alerting blood pressure reaction on arising, morning BP surge and BP variability were greater in these subjects than in control normotensives, although lower than sustained hypertensives. Although this is still speculative, we cannot exclude the possibility that even a slight increase in morning BP surge might in the long term constitute an additional load on the circulation that could increase cardiovascular risk in subjects with WCHT compared to matched normotensives.     

Impact of prehypertension on carotid artery intima–media thickening: Actual or masked?

BackgroundRecent studies have reported that prehypertension is associated with increased values of common carotid artery intima–media thickness (CCA-IMT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels on the association of prehypertension with CCA intima–media thickening in prehypertensive subjects.MethodsA total of 807 subjects with office systolic BP < 140 and diastolic BP < 90 mmHg, underwent 24 h ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring and carotid artery ultrasonographic measurements. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to office and daytime ABP levels: (1) normotensives: subjects with office BP < 120/80 mmHg and daytime ambulatory BP values within the normal range, (2) actual prehypertensives: individuals with office SBP (120–139 mmHg) and/or DBP (80–89 mmHg) and daytime ambulatory BP values within the normal range and (3) prehypertensives with masked hypertension (MH): patients with office SBP (120–139 mmHg) and/or DBP (80–89 mmHg) and elevated daytime ambulatory BP values.ResultsPrehypertensive patients with MH had higher (p < 0.01) CCA-IMT values (0.712 mm; 95%CI: 0.698–0.725) than actual prehypertensives (0.649 mm; 95%CI: 0.641–0.656) and normotensives (0.655 mm; 95%CI: 0.641–0.670) even after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Normotensives and actual prehypertensives did not differ significantly regarding CCA-IMT values (p > 0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, (including demographic characteristics, vascular risk factors, and office BP) prehypertension with MH was independently (p < 0.01) associated with a 0.06 mm increment in CCA-IMT (95%CI: 0.03–0.09).ConclusionsPatients with office BP levels in the prehypertensive range, who also have elevated daytime ABP levels, had higher CCA-IMT values than patients with prehypertension with normal daytime ABP values and normotensive individuals.     

厄贝沙坦不同时间用药对血压昼夜节律的影响研究

目的按照时间药物学的原则,探讨不同用药时间服用厄贝沙坦对非杓型高血压患者血压昼夜节律的影响。方法采用动态血压检测的方法筛选出83例非杓型高血压患者,随机分为厄贝沙坦晨起服药组（41例）和晚上服药组（42例）,均给以厄贝沙坦150～300mg口服,1次/d,共治疗24周。药物治疗前后分别进行诊室血压和动态血压监测的检查。结果两组的诊室收缩压（SBP）在治疗后均明显降低,两组的诊室收缩压（SBP）在治疗前后差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。动态血压结果显示,两组均能降低夜间SBP（P〈0.05,P〈0.01）,夜间服药更能有效地降低夜间的SBP。晨起服药组的白天血压达标率（SBP〈135mmHg）为36.5%,晚上服药组的白天血压达标率为33.3%,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。晨起服药组的夜间血压达标率（SBP〈125mmHg）为29.2%,晚上服药组的夜间血压达标率为61.9%,差异有显著意义（P〈0.01）。晨起服药组血压昼夜节律纠正率为19.5%,晚上服药组血压昼夜节律纠正率为52.4%,差异有显著意义（P〈0.01）。结论对于非杓型高血压患者,厄贝沙坦晚上服药可以有效地纠正夜间的高负荷血压,提高夜间血压达标率,改善血压昼夜节律。     

White coat effect in treated and untreated patients with high office blood pressure. Relationship with pulse wave velocity and left ventricular mass index.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in hypertensive patients whether the white coat effect is associated with target-organ damage and whether it is modified by anti-hypertensive therapy. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study we evaluated blood pressure (BP) measured in the office and by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) as an index of aortic stiffness, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in 88 subjects (aged 49 +/- 2 years) with white-coat hypertension (WCH, office BP > 140/90, daytime BP < 130/84 mmHg), 31 under antihypertensive therapy, 57 untreated, and in 115 patients with office and ambulatory hypertension (HT, aged 51 +/- 2 years, office BP > 140/90, daytime BP > 135/85), 65 under antihypertensive therapy, 50 untreated. In a longitudinal study in 15 patients with HT and in 11 patients with WCH we evaluated the influence of antihypertensive therapy (> 6 months) on office and ambulatory BP and on PWV. RESULTS: The intensity of the white coat effect (office BP-daytime BP) was greater in WCH than in HT. Taking all subjects, the white coat effect did not correlate with PWV (r = 0.08, ns) or with LVMI (r = 0.01, ns), whereas daytime BP correlated significantly with PWV (r = 0.41, p < 0.01) and with LVMI (r = 0.32, p < 0.05). WCH subjects showed lower PWV and LVMI than HT subjects. Treated and untreated WCH, with similar office and daytime BP, showed similar values of PWV and LVMI. Treated and untreated HT showed similar office BP values but treated HT showed lower daytime BP and PWV values. In the longitudinal study, antihypertensive therapy significantly reduced daytime BP and PWV values in the 15 HTs, whereas in the 11 WCH it did not alter daytime BP or PWV values. CONCLUSIONS: 1. In both WCH and HT (treated and untreated) the intensity of the white coat effect does not reflect either the severity of hypertension measured by target organ damage or the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment. 2. In WCH antihypertensive therapy does not improve either ambulatory BP values or damage to target organs.     

Left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients with good blood pressure control outside the clinic,but poor clinic blood pressure control

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in treated patients with good blood pressure (BP) control during multiple home BP (HBP) measurements and during 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), but with unsatisfactory BP control in the clinic. These patients were compared with treated hypertensives whose BP was well controlled under the three circumstances. METHODS: Seventy-two treated consecutive patients (group I, age 56 +/- 10 years) with clinic BP values > or = 140/90 mmHg, and a difference between clinic and self-measured HBP > 10 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and/or > 20 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP), underwent the following procedures: (1) clinic BP measurement; (2) routine diagnostic work-up; (3) HBP monitoring; (4) 24-h ABPM; (5) echocardiography. Thirty-five hypertensive patients with satisfactory BP control according to clinic (< 140/90 mmHg), HBP (< or = 131/82 mmHg) and ABP criteria (< or = 125/79 mmHg) were included as the control group (group II, age 55 +/- 9 years). RESULTS: In group I, 33 subjects out of the 72 (46%) with clinic BP > 140/90 mmHg had BP values controlled outside the clinic (23 according to HBP criteria and 22 according to ABP criteria). The prevalence of LVH (LV mass index > 134 g/m2 in men and > 110 g/m2 in women) was significantly higher in these patients (15.1 versus 2.8%, P < 0.01) than in group II (BP also controlled in the clinic), despite the fact that HBP and ABP were reduced to similar levels in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our data provide evidence that treated hypertensive patients with good BP control at home or during ambulatory monitoring, but incomplete BP control in the clinic, have more pronounced cardiac alterations than patients with both clinic and out of the clinic BP control. This finding offers a new piece of information about the diagnostic value of BP measurement in the clinic to assess BP control during antihypertensive treatment.     

Utility of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement in a routine clinical setting of patients with chronic renal disease

The objective of the study was to investigate the utility of 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in patients with chronic renal disease (CRD). A retrospective audit was performed in an academic nephrology department. ABPMs obtained from 95 consecutive outpatients with nondiabetic renal disease were analysed for their power to stratify disease severity and to predict progression of renal insufficiency during 3 years follow-up. The average of 10 consecutive office blood pressure (BP) readings performed at baseline was used as a reference. Correlations and tabulated statistics were calculated. Baseline mean diurnal BP was 138/87 mmHg by ABPM and 146/92 mmHg by average office BP (56.8 vs 25.3% normotensives, P < 0.01). Mean serum creatinine was 154 +/- 109 micromol/l. Patients without a circadian BP pattern (61%) had significantly higher serum creatinine, urinary albumin excretion and subsequent progression rates of renal failure (P < 0.05). Systolic and pulse pressure ABP values correlated significantly with serum creatinine levels at baseline and 3 years thereafter, independent of daytime (r = 0.23-0.60; P < 0.05). Abnormal nocturnal systolic and mean ABP, and pulse pressure but not average day office BP were significantly associated with abnormal serum creatinine and the presence of coronary heart disease at baseline (relative risk 1.6-1.7, P < 0.05). In conclusion, physicians considered ABPM preferentially in patients with borderline-controlled BP. ABPM provided significant additional information relevant to the clinical decision making process compared with average office BP alone thereby justifying its use in specific situations.     

Effect of doxazosin GITS on 24-hour blood pressure profile in patients with stage 1 to stage 2 primary hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) on the 24 h blood pressure (BP) profile by ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) in patients with stage 1 to stage 2 primary hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen hypertensive patients-either untreated or after a two-week run-in/washout period-underwent office and ABPM monitoring before and six weeks after an open-label once-daily morning dose of 4 mg of doxazosin GITS, an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist. Fourteen patients responded; three did not. Data analyses refers to the responders: linear analysis demonstrated statistically significant reductions from baseline in daytime, night-time, and total 24 h means for systolic BP (SBP) (7-10 mmHg) and diastolic BP (DBP) (5-10 mmHg) after treatment, with no statistically significant change in heart rate (HR). Rhythm analysis demonstrated statistically significant reductions from baseline in mean mesor (8 mmHg), maximum (6 mmHg) and minimum (10 mmHg) values in SBP, and in mean mesor (5 mmHg), maximum (7 mmHg) and minimum (5 mmHg) values in DBP. Circadian rhythm parameters in BP and HR were not significantly altered by treatment. Treatment with doxazosin GITS was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: A single morning dose of doxazosin GITS at 4 mg significantly reduced ambulatory SBP and DBP throughout a 24 h period while preserving a normal 24 h BP and HR rhythm profile in stage 1 to stage 2 hypertensives.     

Ambulatory blood pressure characteristics in normotensive and treated hypertensive older people

The objective of this study was to determine the normal values and characteristics of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and to describe the ABP level of treated hypertensive subjects in an older Finnish population. ABP was measured in 502 randomly selected subjects aged 64 years or over living in a Finnish municipality (mean age 70 years, range 64-87 years). A total of 211 subjects did not have blood pressure (BP) affecting medication. ABP measurements were taken every 30 min for 24 h, and the day- and night-time periods were diary-based. The results were that in untreated subjects, the average office BP was 134/82 +/- 16/9 (s.d.) mm Hg for men and 140/81 +/- 18/8 mm Hg for women. The 24-h average BP was 120/75 +/- 14/8 mm Hg (95th percentile upper limit 145/93 mm Hg) for men and 125/75 +/- 15/7 (95th = 154/89 mm Hg) for women. The daytime averages were 127/78 +/- 12/7 mm Hg (95th = 154/99 mm Hg) and 131/78 +/- 15/7 mm Hg (95th = 158/91 mm Hg) for men and women, respectively. The ABP daytime value of 130/83 mm Hg corresponded best to the office BP value of 140/90 mm Hg. All BP values were significantly higher in the treated hypertensive group compared to the normotensive group. Night-time BP was markedly lower than daytime BP, and no difference in circadian variability was found between the normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Both office and ambulatory BPs were significantly higher in women than in men. This study provides sex-specific normal values for ABP in a 64 to 87-year-old age group. The normal values of ABP were markedly lower than the office BP values. Hypertensives, even when treated, tended to have elevated values.     

Morning hypertension: the strongest independent risk factor for stroke in elderly hypertensive patients.

Stroke occurs most frequently in the morning hours, but the impact of the morning blood pressure (BP) level on stroke risk has not been fully investigated in hypertensives. We studied stroke prognosis in 519 older hypertensives in whom ambulatory BP monitoring was performed, and who were followed prospectively. During an average duration of 41 months (range: 1-68 months), 44 stroke events occurred. The morning systolic BP (SBP) was the strongest independent predictor for stroke events among clinic, 24-h, awake, sleep, evening, and pre-awake BPs, with a 10 mmHg increase in morning SBP corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 1.44 (p<0.0001). The average of the morning and evening SBP (Av-ME-SBP; 10 mmHg increase: RR=1.41, p=0.0001), and the difference between the morning and evening SBP (Di-ME-SBP; 10 mmHg increase: RR=1.24, p=0.0025) were associated with stroke risks independently of each other. The RR of morning hypertension (Av-ME-SBP > or = 135 mmHg and Di-ME-SBP > or = 20 mmHg) vs. sustained hypertension (Av-ME-SBP > = 135 mmHg and Di-ME-SBP < or = 20 mmHg) for stoke events was 3.1 after controlling for other risk factors (p=0.01). In conclusion, morning hypertension is the strongest independent predictor for future clinical stroke events in elderly hypertensive patients, and morning and evening BPs should be monitored in the home as a first step in the treatment of hypertensive patients.     

Prevalence of target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients: different impact of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure control

OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, LV concentric remodelling and microalbuminuria in a selected sample of treated hypertensive patients with effective and prolonged clinic blood pressure (BP) control (BP < 140/90 mmHg). Second, to compare the prevalence of these markers of organ damage in patients with and without ambulatory BP (ABP) control, defined as average daytime BP < 132/85 mmHg). DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-eight consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension outpatient clinic over a period of 3 months and were regularly followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. Obesity, diabetes mellitus, history or signs of cardiovascular or renal complications and major noncardiovascular diseases were the exclusion criteria from the study. Each patient underwent 24 h ABP monitoring, echocardiography and 24 h urine collection for albumin measurement. RESULTS: The prevalence of LV hypertrophy (LV mass index > 125 g/m2 in both sexes), LV concentric remodelling (relative wall thickness > 0.45) and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion < 300 mg/ 24 h) in this selected group of patients (32 men, 26 women; mean age 53 +/- 9 years; mean clinic BP 122 +/- 9/ 78 +/- 6 mmHg) was markedly low (6.9, 8.6 and 5.1%, respectively). The 26 patients with effective ABP control (group I) were similar to the 32 patients without effective ABP control (group II) in age, gender, body surface area, clinic BP, smoking habit, glucose, cholesterol and creatinine plasma levels. Prevalence of LV hypertrophy, LV concentric remodelling and microalbuminuria was lower in group I than in group II (0 versus 12.9% P< 0.01, 7.7 versus 9.4% NS, 3.8 versus 6.2% NS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that nonobese, nondiabetic hypertensive patients with an effective clinic BP control have a very low prevalence of target organ damage and that LVH is present only in individuals with insufficient ABP control.     

A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of telmisartan, amlodipine and ramipril in patients with confirmed ambulatory hypertension

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the antihypertensive effects and the duration of action of telmisartan, amlodipine and ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring. METHODS: After a 2-4-week single-blind, placebo run-in period, qualifying patients were randomized to receive telmisartan 80 mg (n=18); amlodipine 5 mg (n=22); titrated to 10 mg after 4 weeks; or ramipril 2.5 mg (n=17); titrated to 5 mg and 10 mg after 1 and 3 weeks, respectively, administered once daily in the morning (0700 h). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed at baseline and at the end of the 8-week treatment period. Plasma renin activity was measured over 24 h at the same time points. RESULTS: Telmisartan and amlodipine provided significant reductions from baseline (P<0.0001) and not statistically different reductions between treatments in ABP during daytime (9.3/6.0 and 14.7/9.4 mmHg, respectively) and night-time (12.4/7.7 and 13.3/8.6 mmHg, respectively) at the end of 8 weeks' treatment. In contrast, although ramipril provided significant reductions in ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP from 2-6 h post dose (peak effect), it failed to induce significant reductions in mean daytime (4.5/1.6 mmHg) and night-time (1.8/0.1 mmHg) ambulatory BP. In addition, the greater reductions in ABP with telmisartan and amlodipine were associated with a significant rise in plasma renin activity whereas ramipril only increased renin during the first 4 h of the administration interval. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study confirm the efficacy of both telmisartan and amlodipine in reducing ABP during each period of the 24-h interval. Because ABP reduction with ramipril was restricted to its peak effect, the present data do not support the use of this agent when administered once daily in the morning.     

Prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure value: from the Japan Home versus Office Measurement Evaluation Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure values. METHODS: The study population consisted of 3303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive treatment in Japan. Information on the characteristics of the patients was collected by a physician's self-administrated questionnaire. The office blood pressure value was calculated as the average of the four readings in two visits. All patients were asked to measure their blood pressure once every morning and once every evening. In the study, we included patients with at least three measurements in the morning and in the evening, respectively. The average of all home blood pressure values was taken as the home blood pressure value. RESULTS: The mean value of home systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 136.8/79.3 mmHg, and the mean value of office systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 142.8/80.6 mmHg. Of the 3303 patients, 758 (23.0%) had controlled hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 628 (19.0%) had masked uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 640 (19.4%) had treated white-coat hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg), and 1277 (38.7%) had uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Treated white-coat hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension were often observed in clinical settings. Physicians need to understand the prevalence of such patients to prevent inadequate diagnosis and treatment in them.