Hepatic resection using a water jet dissector

A newly-designed water jet dissector was used for hepatic resections in humans. To evaluate its usefulness, the water jet dissector was compared toan ultrasonic surgical aspirator in terms of average blood loss and time of operation. In hepatectomies on patients associated with liver cirrhosis, the average blood loss during hepatic resection using the water jet dissector was significantly smaller (P<0.05) than that with the ultrasonic surgical aspirator. However, in hepatectomies on patients without cirrhosis, the average blood loss during hepatic resection did not significantly differ between the two groups. Neither did the time of operation significantly differ between the two procedures in hepatectomies on patients with and without liver cirrhosis. No serious complications attributable to the use of the water jet dissector were encountered. The water jet dissector is thus considered to be a useful new device for use in the transection of the liver during hepatic resections.     

Techniques of liver resection. Comparison of suction knife, ultrasonic dissector, and contact neodymium-YAG laser

Liver resections were performed in 18 pigs with an inexpensive disposable plastic suction knife, an ultrasonic dissector, or a contact neodymium (Nd)-YAG laser. Technical aspects and intraoperative and postoperative data were compared. Intraoperative blood loss was less with the suction knife (112 +/- 28 mL) than with the ultrasonic dissector (149 +/- 45 mL) or Nd-YAG laser (174 +/- 25 mL). Operating time was similar in all groups. The number of ligatures used in the Nd-YAG laser group (12 +/- 1) was significantly less than in the ultrasonic dissector (27 +/- 2) or suction knife (32 +/- 2) groups. In the ultrasonic dissector group, there was an increase in postoperative white blood cell count and liver enzyme levels compared with the other two groups. Light microscopy revealed dilated bile ducts in the ultrasonic dissector resection group, which may reflect biliary stasis. There were no significant differences in mortality among the three experimental groups. Results indicated that the ultrasonic dissector and the contact laser method were not substantially better than an inexpensive, easily modified plastic suction catheter in performing a major nonanatomic liver resection in piglets.     

Nonanatomic hepatic resection with a pledgetted suturing technique

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Anatomic hepatic resection is dependent on the segmental infrastructure of the liver, whereas nonanatomic resection is independent of structural planes and is often fraught with excessive bleeding. The authors describe their experience with a novel technique using pledgetted suturing for extensive liver resection in patients with benign or malignant hepatic tumors. METHODS: Four children, (mean age, 24.7 +/- 12.5 months) underwent liver resection for the following hepatic lesions: hepatoblastoma, invasive Wilms' tumor, Caroli's disease, and infantile hemangioendothelioma. In the child with hepatoblastoma, the lesion was considered unresectable by segmental anatomy. A surgical technique was designed in which nonabsorbable 2-0 Teflon felt pledgetted sutures were placed through the liver parenchyma in a nonanatomic resection plane. The mattress sutures were sequentially tied until the resection plane was defined. The resection was sharply completed with a scalpel along the line of pledgetted sutures, independent of hepatic segmental anatomy. RESULTS: Complete surgical resections of the hepatic lesions were obtained in all cases. Estimated blood loss was minimal with a mean of 5.3 +/- 0.9 mL/kg. No patient received a blood transfusion as a result of the hepatic resection. There were no postoperative hepatic complications resulting from the resection. The child with hepatoblastoma had a delayed recovery, resulting in reexploration that ruled out a subphrenic abscess. CONCLUSIONS: The pledgetted suturing technique for hepatic resection is relatively bloodless, safe, easy to perform, and may enable a complete surgical resection of otherwise unresectable lesions. We advocate this technique when approaching a large hepatic lesion that would entail a difficult or incomplete anatomic resection in infants. J Pediatr Surg 36:209-212.     

Hepatic resection technique

The author describes a technique of hepatic resection that is particularly beneficial for segmental and nonanatomic procedures. The technique is reportedly safe and accurate due to the use of the Nd:YAG laser and the ultrasonic dissector.     

Hepatic resections for primary and metastatic tumors using the ultrasonic surgical dissector.

We have previously described the development of new hepatic surgical techniques using the ultrasonic surgical dissector. With 10 years' experience, we have found that major liver resections have been simplified and that the technique is repeatable in hands other than our own. Thirty-three patients had 37 tumors, averaging 5.65 cm in size, resected with an average blood loss of only 1,020 mL per case, which included 5 right trisegmentectomies, 12 lobectomies, 15 segmental resections, and 4 subsegmental resections. Twenty-two patients had metastatic colorectal cancer. Blood transfusion requirements averaged only 2.24 units in long-term survivors, which was significantly less than the 3.5 units received by patients who have since died (p = 0.092). There were no operative deaths. The median survival of these 22 patients was 56 months, and the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 35%. All of the early deaths occurred in patients with more than four tumors, and no patient with less than four tumors died before 42 months with recurrent disease. Six patients had bilateral tumors, and the fact that patients survived into the fourth and fifth post-resectional year indicates that resection was worthwhile. All these patients had Dukes' C primary tumors, but we found no statistical difference in survival between patients with Dukes' B and Dukes' C lesions. The results indicate that hepatic resection with the ultrasonic surgical dissector decreases blood loss, requires few transfusions, is safe to perform, and is associated with excellent long-term survival.     

Hilar glissonean access to vascular-secretory elements in anatomical segmental liver resections

It still remains unclear which patients with hepatic tumors can favour anatomical segmental liver resections instead of major liver resection. Short term results of anatomical segmental liver resection are evaluated and analyzed. Ten patients underwent the anatomical segmental liver resection performed by posterior approach with taping of anterior right hepatic vein. Seven patients had liver metastases of colorectal cancer, one had primary hepatic carcinoma and two had benign lesions, anatomical segmental liver resection were performed without Pringle maneuver. There was no significant difference in blood loss, duration of the procedure, postoperative hospital stay and morbidity in comparison with the segmental liver resection performed by anterior approach. Multiple, large and deep-embedded lesions were removed completely, with tumor-free resection margins. Anatomical segmental liver resection performed by hilar glissonean approach is recommended in patients with compromised liver function "unfavourable" liver anatomy to replace major liver resection provides removal of only affected part of the liver accordingly to its true anatomical borders.     

Ultrasonic-mediated laparoscopic liver transection

Parenchymal liver transection represents a fundamental phase of liver surgery. Several devices have been described for safe and careful dissection of the liver parenchyma during laparoscopic liver surgery, but the ideal technique has not yet been defined. This report describes the combined use of ultrasonic dissector and the ultrasonic coagulating cutter for laparoscopic liver resection. The ultrasonic dissector is used to fracture the parenchyma along the line of proposed division, and the uncovered bridging structures are sealed using the ultrasonic coagulating cutter. The combined use of ultrasonic dissector and harmonic scalpel allows liver resection to be safely performed, with the advantage of minimal surgical complication and low blood losses.     

经正中裂入路单独完整肝尾状叶切除术的策略探讨(附19例报告)

目的探讨经肝正中裂路径行单独完整尾状叶全切除治疗肝尾状叶肿瘤的策略。方法回顾性分析1995年1月至2006年6月,接受经正中入路单独完整尾状叶切除术的19例直径4～12cm的肝尾状叶肿瘤患者的临床资料。术中常规使用两套彭氏多功能手术解剖器使用技术、低中心静脉压技术、选择性应用肝脏血流控制技术、绕肝提拉技术、逆行肝尾状叶切除技术等。19例中肝细胞性肝癌13例、胆管细胞性肝癌4例、肝血管瘤2例。结果所有手术均顺利完成。手术平均时间（296±55）min,术中失血量500—3000ml,平均1200ml。全组无围手术期（术后30d内）死亡病例,术后发生腹水2例,经输注白蛋白、利尿后治愈;右胸腔积液5例,经多次穿刺抽液后治愈;胆漏2例,分别引流10d和13d后自愈。结论经肝正中裂路径可提高肝尾状叶肿瘤的手术切除率;而常规应用两套彭氏多功能手术解剖器使用技术、低中心静脉压技术、选择性应用肝脏血流控制技术、绕肝提拉技术、逆行肝尾状叶切除技术等技术是安全实施经正中入路单独完整尾状叶切除术的主要策略。     

A review of techniques for liver resection

BACKGROUND: There has been a significant increase in the number of hepatic resections performed. The aim of this review was to assess available techniques for liver resection and their application. METHODS: A literature review was performed based on a Medline search to identify articles on liver resection. Keywords included liver resection, liver neoplasm, cancer, colorectal metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS: Improved understanding of the segmental anatomy of the liver has resulted in the evolution of liver resection. The development of new approaches to the biliovascular tree, combined with clamping to produce ischaemic demarcation, has been important in demonstrating segmental boundaries for resection. The combination of methods of vascular control such as the Pringle manoeuvre and techniques of parenchymal resection such as ultrasonic dissection allows hepatic resection with minimal blood loss and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Application of refined techniques for liver resection by specialised units allows liver resection to be performed on both normal and cirrhotic livers with low morbidity and mortality.     

A prospective evaluation of ultrasonic dissector plus harmonic scalpel in liver resection

Several techniques have been described for safe dissection of the liver parenchyma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of combining two different electronic devices, the ultrasonic dissector and the harmonic scalpel, during hepatic resection. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent liver resection between January and December 2004 were enclosed in the study. Patients requiring concomitant colic resection or biliary-enteric anastomosis were excluded from the study. Operative variables (type of procedure, operating time, Pringle time, blood losses, transfusions, and histological tumor exposure at the transection surface), hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The extent of hepatic resection was a minor resection in 31 and major in 69 cases. Median blood loss was 500 mL (range, 100-2000 mL) and the Pringle maneuver was used in 58 patients. Median operative time was 367 minutes (range, 150-660 minutes). Hepatic resection was performed in 32 cirrhotic livers. Surgical complications included one postoperative hemorrhage and two bile leaks. The overall morbidity and mortality rate was 14 and 1 per cent, respectively. In conclusion, the combined use of these electronic devices allows liver resection to be safely performed, even in cirrhotic patients, with the advantage of reducing surgical complications. A prospective randomized trial is needed to clarify the clinical benefits of liver resections performed combining these two devices.     

Laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Despite recent progress in diagnostics for hepatocellular carcinoma, the rate of resectability remains low, mainly because of the advancement of the underlying liver disease. We report a case of a 54-year-old man with a hepatocellular carcinoma and poor liver function that was treated successfully with a laparoscopic hepatic resection. Laparoscopic hepatic resection is considered to be feasible with the aid of an ultrasonic dissector and a microwave coagulator; however, close attention should be paid to the development of air embolism and hepatic vein injury.     

“Technological” approach versus clamp crushing technique for hepatic parenchymal transection: A comparative study

We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of combining two different electronic devices, the ultrasonic dissector (UD) and the harmonic scalpel (HS), during hepatic resection. One hundred consecutive patients underwent liver resection using UD plus HS between January and December 2004 (UD + HS group). The ultrasonic dissector was used to fracture liver parenchyma and the uncovered vessel was sealed using the HS. Surgical outcomes were compared with 100 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection using the clamp crushing method. Operative variables, postoperative liver function, hospital stay, and type and number of complications were compared. The two groups were equivalent in term of demographic and pathologic variables. The UD + HS group had a decreased blood loss (500 ml versus 700 ml, P=0.005), number of patients transfused (22 versus 39, P=0.009), tumor exposure at the transection surface (4 versus 12, P=00.012), and hospital stay (7 versus 8.5 days, P=0.020). Postoperative major complications, in particular, fluid collection and biliary fistula, were significantly less frequent in the UD+HS group (2 versus 9, P=0.030). A longer operative time was recorded in the UD+HS group (385 versus 330 minutes, P=0.001). The combined use of UD with HS allows liver resection to be safely performed, with the advantage of reducing blood losses and surgery-related complications. The only major disadvantage may be a longer transection time.     

Median hepatotomy using ultrasonic dissection for complex hepatobiliary problems

Strictures of the Intrahepatic ducts, centrally located hepatic tumors, and intrahepatic stones present difficult management problems. The median hepatotomy can be easily and safely performed with the aid of an ultrasonic liver dissector and a knowledge of hepatic anatomy. The approach allows the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts and primary and secondary bifurcations thereof to be exposed precisely without dissecting the porta or compromising the blood supply to the liver. We employed this technique without mortality and with minimal morbidity in eight patients, of whom two had Klatskin's tumors, one had an iatrogenic stricture of the right hepatic duct, one had sclerosing cholangitis, one had Intrahepatic gallstones, and three had centrally located tumors. The technique is recommended as an aid in the management of complex hepatobiliary problems.     

New technique for liver resection using heat coagulative necrosis

OBJECTIVE: To assess a new bloodless technique using radiofrequency energy for segmental liver resection of hepatic tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Liver resection remains a formidable surgical procedure; safe performance requires a high level of training and skill. Intraoperative blood loss during liver resection remains a major concern because it is associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications and shorter long-term survival. METHODS: From January 2000 to June 2001, 15 patients with various hepatic tumors were operated on using radiofrequency energy to remove the tumor in its entirety. Radiofrequency energy was applied along the margins of the tumor to create "zones of necrosis" before resection with a scalpel. RESULTS: No blood transfusions were required. The mean blood loss during resection was 30 +/- 10 mL. No mortality or morbidity was observed. The median postoperative stay was 8 days (range 5-9). No liver recurrence was detected in patients undergoing resection with this technique during follow-up periods ranging from 2 to 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental and wedge liver resection assisted by radiofrequency is safe. This novel technique offers a new method for transfusion-free resection.     

Reproposal for Hjortsjo's segmental anatomy on the anterior segment in human liver

BACKGROUND: A minimum, but necessary amount, of cancer-containing liver tissue is to be excised in patients who have poor liver function. To achieve that goal of excision, a limited hepatic resection has been carried out. However, performing subsegmentectomy of the anterior segment according to the conventional segmental anatomy introduced by Healey and Schroy or Couinaud is difficult. Because the transverse border between segments 5 and 8 was drawn as an imaginary line through the right portal vein, there is no anatomical structure indicating this border. HYPOTHESIS: Hjortsjo divided the anterior segment into 2 vertical segments according to the fissure in which a hepatic vein coursed. By including Hjortsjo's concept of segmental anatomy, new procedures will be added to hepatic surgery. DESIGN: Sixty-five cadaveric livers were dissected to confirm Hjortsjo's concept of segmental anatomy by investigating the vertical fissure that divides the anterior segment into 2 areas, concerning the relation between portal segmentation and the hepatic venous system of the anterior segment. RESULTS: The territories of the third-order portal branches of the anterior segment were divided into 2 (ventral and dorsal) areas with a vertical fissure and in its intersubsegmental plane, an independent hepatic vein, or a first-order branch of the middle or the right hepatic vein coursed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirmed the certainty of Hjortsjo's concept of segmental anatomy of the anterior segment. This is relevant for developing new procedures in hepatic surgery. Its reproposal is opportune for adding it as another concept to the conventional segmental anatomy.     

The surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: our experience

Data from twelve patients who had hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases were retrospectively analyzed to determine: 1) whether the use of the ultrasonic surgical dissector and the Argon laser can significantly simplify major hepatic resections and decrease both perioperative blood loss and postoperative morbidity and mortality, and 2) whether an adequate patients selection for surgery can effectively determine an improvement in recurrence rate. We performed 4 bisegmentectomies (2 of V and VI; 2 of VI and VII); 1 trisegmentectomy (V, VI, VII); 2 left lobectomies; 1 right hepatectomy and 4 wedge resections, using both the ultrasonic surgical dissector to fractionate and aspirate the hepatic parenchyma and to clear major vascular and biliary structures and the Argon laser for the coagulation of minor vascular and biliary vessels. The resected metastases averaged 5.5 cm (range: 1.5-7.5); blood transfusion requirements were significantly reduced from previous reports, averaging only 1.25 units (range: 0.3); the average operative time was 238 minutes (110 to 420 minutes). There were no operative deaths, operative morbidity rate was 16.6. The results indicate that the ultrasonic surgical dissector and the Argon laser have made a significant contribution to our marked decrease in the average blood loss and transfusion requirement. The long-term results seems to be improved by an adequate patients selection.     

Anterior approach for major right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To report the surgical and long-term outcomes of major right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the anterior approach compared with the conventional approach. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Great difficulty can be encountered during major right hepatic resection for large HCC using the conventional approach. Forceful retraction during mobilization of the tumor might result in serious complications, including dissemination of cancer cells, iatrogenic tumor rupture, and excessive bleeding, leading to unfavorable surgical and long-term outcomes. METHODS: In patients who had large HCC at the right lobe of liver and underwent major hepatic resection, the technique of anterior approach was used. After hilar control of the inflow blood vessels and without prior mobilization of the right lobe of liver and the tumor, parenchymal transection was performed using an ultrasonic dissector from the anterior surface of the liver until the anterior surface of the inferior vena cava was exposed. All venous tributaries, including the right hepatic vein, were controlled before the right lobe of liver was mobilized. Surgical and long-term outcomes were analyzed retrospectively and compared with patients who underwent surgery using the conventional approach. RESULTS: From 1989 to 1997, the anterior approach was used for major right hepatic resection in 54 patients with HCC of 5 cm or more in diameter. When compared with the 106 patients with similar clinical parameters who underwent hepatic resection using the conventional approach during the same period, the patients in the anterior approach group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion, a lower hospital death rate, a lower incidence of pulmonary metastases, and a better median disease-free survival and median overall cumulative survival. CONCLUSION: The anterior approach is the preferred technique for major right hepatic resection for large HCC because it resulted in improved surgical and survival outcomes compared with the conventional approach.     

Surgical techniques in hepatic resections: Ultrasonic aspirator versus Jet-Cutter. A prospective randomized clinical trial

AIM OF THE STUDY: For all resection-techniques of liver tissue intra- and post-operative blood-loss remains an important problem. Two novel resection-techniques the ultrasound-aspirator (CUSA) and the water-jet dissector (Jet-Cutter) appear to offer significant advantages regarding this problem. Aim of the present prospective clinical study was the comparison of these dissection techniques.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective randomized study with the end points blood-loss, length of surgery, tissue trauma and long-term survival.FINDINGS: Significant differences between both procedures with Jet-Cutter (n = 31) versus ultrasonic surgical aspirator CUSA (n = 30) were observed regarding length of resection and complete liver ischemia time (Pringle-time). Here significant advantages of the jet-cutter-technique were observed with 28 +/- 11 minutes length of resection versus 46 +/- 19 minutes and 29 +/- 12 minutes Pringle-time versus 39 +/- 16 minutes. Furthermore, significant fewer blood transfusions were required following jet-cutter-resection with a mean of 1.5 blood units vs. 2.5 blood units using the CUSA. No differences were observed regarding postoperative long-term survival.CONCLUSIONS: The jet-cutter-technique is a fast and safe surgical procedure for liver resections and offers an attractive therapeutic alternative for various indications in liver surgery.     

Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver

HYPOTHESIS: Hepatic parenchymal transection is a technical priority in liver surgery. The use of an ultrasonic dissector for hepatectomy may result in less blood loss than conventional clamp crushing. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: The 132 patients scheduled to undergo partial hepatectomies were randomly assigned to receive hepatic transection by ultrasonic dissector or by clamp crushing (66 patients by each method). INTERVENTIONS: All resections were performed with inflow occlusion and were guided ultrasonographically. Hepatectomies were graded according to a predefined system based on 6 criteria (blood loss, transection time, technical error, surgical margin, landmark appearance, and postoperative morbidity), each with 3 scores (lower scores indicating higher quality). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood loss and hepatectomy grade. RESULTS: No difference was found between the ultrasonic and clamp groups in median blood loss (515 mL [range, 15-2527 mL] vs 452 mL [range, 17-1912 mL]; P =.63), transection time (61 minutes [range, 16-177 minutes] vs 54 minutes [range, 7-205 minutes]; P =.58), or transection speed (1.1 cm(2)/min [range, 0.4-4.0 cm(2)/min] vs 1.0 cm(2)/min [range, 0.4-3.0 cm(2)/min]; P =.90). Ultrasonic dissection caused more frequent histologically proven tumor exposure at the surgical margin (9 vs 3 patients; P =.09), incomplete appearance of landmark hepatic veins on the cut surface after anatomical resection (12 vs 4 patients; P =.03), and postoperative morbidity (20 vs 14 patients; P =.32) than did clamp crushing. The hepatectomies with clamp crushing had significantly higher grades than those with ultrasonic dissection (P =.05), as indicated by the lower median sum score (4.0 [range, 0-12] vs 5.0 [range, 0-19]; 95% confidence interval for difference, -2.0 to 0; P =.03). The transection method independently influenced hepatectomy grade (adjusted odds ratio = 3.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-6.92; P =.01). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic dissection offers no reduction in blood loss compared with clamp crushing for transection of the liver. Clamp crushing results in a higher quality of hepatectomy and is therefore the option of choice.