Comparison of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus/sirolimus combination in kidney transplantation monitored by surveillance biopsy

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation. METHODS: In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored. RESULTS: Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27 % in TAC/MMF and 16 % in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P = 0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 10% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P = 0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.     

Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) or Sirolimus vs. Cyclosporine with MMF in Cardiac Transplant Patients: 1-Year Report

The most advantageous combination of immunosuppressive agents for cardiac transplant recipients has not yet been established. Between November 2001 and June 2003, 343 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to receive steroids and either tacrolimus (TAC) + sirolimus (SRL), TAC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclosporine (CYA) + MMF. Antilymphocyte induction therapy was allowed for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint of >/=3A rejection or hemodynamic compromise rejection requiring treatment showed no significant difference at 6 months (TAC/MMF 22.4%, TAC/SRL 24.3%, CYA/MMF 31.6%, p = 0.271) and 1 year (p = 0.056), but it was significantly lower in the TAC/MMF group when compared only to the CYA/MMF group at 1 year (23.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.029). Differences in the incidence of any treated rejection were significant (TAC/SRL = 35%, TAC/MMF = 42%, CYA/MMF = 59%; p < 0.001), as were median levels of serum creatinine (TAC/SRL = 1.5 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 1.3 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 1.5 mg/dL; p = 0.032) and triglycerides (TAC/SRL = 162 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 126 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 154 mg/dL; p = 0.028). The TAC/SRL group encountered fewer viral infections but more fungal infections and impaired wound healing. These secondary endpoints suggest that the TAC/MMF combination appears to offer more advantages than TAC/SRL or CYA/MMF in cardiac transplant patients, including fewer >/=3A rejections or hemodynamic compromise rejections and an improved side-effect profile.     

Comparison of four different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: five-year outcomes

Induction and maintenance immunosuppression protocols with or without long-term steroid therapy in kidney transplant recipients are variable and are transplant center-specific. The aim of this prospective randomized pilot study was to compare 5-year outcomes in kidney recipients maintained on 4 different calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy. Two hundred consenting patients who received kidney transplants between June 2000 and October 2004 were enrolled in 4 immunosuppression protocol groups, with 50 patients in each group: cyclosporine (CSA)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), CSA/sirolimus (SRL), tacrolimus (TAC)/MMF, and TAC/SRL. Induction therapy was done with basiliximab and methylprednisolone. Steroids were withdrawn on post-transplant day 2, and long-term steroid therapy was not used. Demographic characteristics among the four groups were comparable; approximately 50% of the recipients were African American and > or =80% of the kidneys transplanted were from deceased donors. Clinical acute rejection (CAR) was confirmed by biopsy and treated with intravenous pulse steroid therapy. Steroid-unresponsive CAR was treated with Thymoglobulin. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR), chronic allograft injury (CAI), and other pathological changes per the Banff 2005 schema. The primary end point was CAR, and secondary end points were 5-year patient and graft survival rates, renal function, SCAR, CAI, and adverse events. In the first year post-transplant, the incidence of CAR was 18% in the CSA/MMF group, 8% in the CSA/SRL group, 14% in the TAC/MMF group, and 4% in the TAC/SRL group (CSA/MMF vs. TAC/SRL; p=0.05). The incidence of SCAR was 22% in the CSA/MMF group, 8% in the CSA/SRL group, 16% in the TAC/MMF group, and 6% in the TAC/SRL group (CSA/MMF vs. CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL; p=0.05). After the first year, the incidences of CAR and SCAR decreased and were comparable in all 4 groups. At 5 years post-transplant, cumulative CAI due to interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), hypertension (HTN), and chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity was observed in 54%, 48%, and 8% of the CSA/MMF group vs. 16%, 36%, and 12% of the CSA/SRL group vs. 38%, 24% and 6% of the TAC/MMF group vs. 14%, 25% and 12% of the TAC/SLR group (IF/TA: CSA/MMF vs. CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL; p=0.04, HTN: CSA/MMF vs. TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL; p=0.05, CNI toxicity: TAC/SRL and CSA/SRL vs. TAC/MMF; p=0.05). Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 82% and 60% in the CSA/MMF group, 82% and 60% in the CSA/SRL group, 84% and 62% in the TAC/MMF group, and 82% and 64% in the TAC/SRL group (p=0.9). Serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearances at 5 years were comparable among the groups. Our data show that the rates of CAR and SCAR in the first year post-transplant were significantly lower in the CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL groups and that cumulative CAI rates due to IF/TA and HTN at 5 years were significantly lower in the TAC/MMF, TAC/SRL, and CSA/SRL groups than in the CSA/MMF group. Despite significant differences in the incidences of CAR and SCAR and prevalence of different types of CAI at 5 years, renal function and patient and graft survival rates at 5 years were comparable among kidney recipients maintained on 4 different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients

The introduction of new immunosuppressants has prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. However, several groups have reported a higher incidence of rejection. We conducted a randomized two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal (at 6 months posttransplant) from the regimens of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine + MMF (CSA group). The entry criteria were recipients of first living donor transplants with no diabetes mellitus (DM), congestive heart failure, chronic liver disease, or acute rejection within 6 months posttransplant. The primary endpoint was a biopsy-proven acute rejection episode or treatment failure within 1 year posttransplant. While 87 recipients were assigned to FK (n = 43) and CSA groups (n = 44) before transplantation, 76 recipients (FK 39, CSA 37) could be tapered off steroids at 6 months posttransplant, since 11 were excluded due to acute rejection within 6 months posttransplant (FK two, CSA three) or protocol violations (FK two, CSA four). After steroid withdrawal, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was 0% in the FK group and 13.5% in the CSA group (P < .05). Other results at 12 months posttransplantation were comparable: the incidences of DM 7.8% versus 0% (FK group vs CSA group), hypercholesterolemia 41.0% versus 59.5%, hypertensives 48.7% versus 59.6% as well as the levels of plasma creatinine 1.21 +/- 0.24 versus 1.31 +/- 0.50 mg/dL (P > .05 in every variable). These data suggest that steroid withdrawal is successful in first living donor renal transplant recipients. Tacrolimus may be significantly more effective than cyclosporine to prevent acute rejection after steroid withdrawal.     

Pretransplant cachexia and morbid obesity are predictors of increased mortality after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND: Extremes in body weight are a relative contraindication to cardiac transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 474 consecutive adult patients (377 male, 97 female, mean age 50.3+/-12.2 years), who received 444 primary and 30 heart retransplants between January of 1992 and January of 1999. Of these, 68 cachectic (body mass index [BMI]<20 kg/m2), 113 overweight (BMI=>27-30 kg/m2), and 55 morbidly obese (BMI>30 kg/m2) patients were compared with 238 normal-weight recipients (BMI=20-27 kg/m2). We evaluated the influence of pretransplant BMI on morbidity and mortality after cardiac transplantation. Kaplan-Meier survival distribution and Cox proportional hazards model were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Morbidly obese as well as cachectic recipients demonstrated nearly twice the 5-year mortality of normal-weight or overweight recipients (53% vs. 27%, respectively, P=0.001). An increase in mortality was seen at 30 days for morbidly obese and cachectic recipients (12.7% and 17.7%, respectively) versus a 30-day mortality rate of 7.6% in normal-weight recipients. Morbidly obese recipients experienced a shorter time to high-grade acute rejection (P=0.004) as well as an increased annual high-grade rejection frequency when compared with normal-weight recipients (P=0.001). By multivariable analysis, the incidence of transplant-related coronary artery disease (TCAD) was not increased in morbidly obese patients but cachectic patients had a significantly lower incidence of TCAD (P=0.05). Cachectic patients receiving oversized donor hearts had a significantly higher postoperative mortality (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The risks of cardiac transplantation are increased in both morbidly obese and cachectic patients compared with normal-weight recipients. However, the results of cardiac transplantation in overweight patients is comparable to that in normal-weight patients. Recipient size should be kept in mind while selecting patients and the use of oversized donors in cachectic recipients should be avoided.     

肾移植长期受者贫血的特征及相关因素分析

目的 分析肾移植长期受者贫血的特征及其影响因素。 方法 以肾移植长期受者258例为研究对象,总结贫血的性质和发生率,分析贫血与红细胞生成素（EPO）、肾小管功能、肾功能、排斥反应、免疫抑制药物及心脑血管并发症的关系。 结果 258例均为首次肾移植受者,贫血的总发生率为41.1％。受者大部分为正细胞正色素性贫血,少部分为小细胞低色素性贫血,极少部分为溶血性贫血。贫血受者中,大部分为EPO缺乏,少部分为EPO抵抗。受者的血红蛋白（Hb）与估算肾小球滤过率（eGFR）、肌酐清除率（Ccr）呈正相关（r = 0.348, P ＜ 0.01;r = 0.351,P ＜ 0.01）;与N-乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶（NAG）呈负相关（r = -0.327,P ＜ 0.01）。在Scr正常的情况下,贫血组肾小管病变比非贫血组严重。贫血受者急、慢性排斥反应的发生率显著高于非贫血受者（P ＜ 0.01)。环孢素+硫唑嘌呤+泼尼松方案（CsA+Aza+Pred ）贫血的发生率为69.0％;环孢素+霉酚酸酯+泼尼松方案（CsA+MMF+Pred）贫血的发生率为35.8％;他可莫司+霉酚酸酯+泼尼松方案（FK506+MMF+Pred)贫血的发生率为34.8％;西罗莫司（雷帕霉素）+霉酚酸酯+泼尼松方案 （SRL+MMF+Pred）贫血的发生率为41.7％。骨髓抑制是硫唑嘌呤最常见的不良反应。Hb与硫唑嘌呤的使用时间呈负相关（r = -0.354,P ＜ 0.01);Hb与霉酚酸酯的剂量（2~3 g/d）及使用时间呈负相关（r = -0.285,P ＜ 0.05;r = -0.372,P ＜ 0.01）;Hb与雷帕霉素的剂量（2~5 mg/d）及使用时间呈负相关（r = -0.278,P ＜ 0.05; r = -0.359,P ＜ 0.01）。贫血受者心脑血管病变发生率显著高于非贫血受者（P ＜ 0.01）。 结论 肾移植长期受者贫血的发生率相当高。贫血不仅与肾功能、肾小管间质病变相关,而且也与EPO、排斥反应、免疫抑制药物相关。贫血是肾移植受者出现心脑血管并发症的高危因素。     

Mycophenolate Mofetil/Sirolimus Compared to Other Common Immunosuppressive Regimens in Kidney Transplantation

We evaluated outcomes with the sirolimus (SRL) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination regimen (SRL/MMF) in solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2005 reported to the Scientific Registry of Renal Transplant Recipients. Three-and-a-half percent received SRL/MMF (n = 2040). Six-month acute rejection rates were higher with SRL/MMF (SRL/MMF: 16.0% vs. other regimens: 11.2%, p < 0.001). Overall graft survival was significantly lower on SRL/MMF. SRL/MMF was associated with twice the hazard for graft loss (AHR = 2.0, 95% C.I., 1.8, 2.2) relative to TAC/MMF, also consistent in both living donor transplants (AHR = 2.4, 95% C.I., 1.9, 2.9) and expanded criteria donor transplants (AHR = 2.1, 95% C.I., 1.7-2.5). Among deceased donor transplants, DGF rates were higher in the SRL/MMF cohort (47% vs. 27%, p < 0.001). However, adjusted graft survival was also significantly inferior with SRL/MMF in DGF-free patients (AHR = 1.9, 95% C.I., 1.6-2.3). In analyses restricted to patients who remained on the discharge regimen at 6 months posttransplant, conditional graft survival in deceased donor transplants was significantly lower with SRL/MMF compared to patients on TAC/MMF or CsA/MMF regimens at 5 years posttransplant (64%, 78%, 78%, respectively, p = 0.001) and across all patient subgroups. In conclusion, SRL/MMF is associated with inferior renal transplant outcomes compared with other commonly used regimens.     

普乐可复预防同种肾移植排斥反应的研究

目的 评价并比较新型免疫抑制普乐可复（ＦＫ５０６）对预防同种肾移植受者排斥反应的疗效及安全性。方法 随机将９８例肾移植受者分成２组。（１）ＦＫ５０６组（ｎ＝４０）;主要用药为ＦＫ５０６＋霉酚酸酯（ＭＭＦ）＋泼尼松（Ｐｒｅｄ）;（２）环孢素９Ａ（ＣｓＡ组）（ｎ＝５８）;主要用药为;ＣｓＡ＋ＭＭＦ＋Ｐｒｅｄ。结果 ２组受者平均随访时间为１２．５个月。     

Increased Risk of Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Patients Receiving a Cyclosporin–Sirolimus Combination

A single-center cohort study of kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients was conducted to evaluate the association between new immunosuppressive regimens and risk of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). From January 1st,1996 to December 31, 2002, 368 patients received a kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant at our center. Four immunosuppressive regimens were evaluated as potential risk factors of TMA: cyclosporin + mycophenolate mofetil (CsA + MMF), cyclosporin + sirolimus (CsA + SRL), tacrolimus + myophenolate mofetil (FK + MMF), and tacrolimus + sirolimus (FK + SRL). Thirteen patients developed biopsy-proven TMA in the absence of vascular rejection. The incidence of TMA was significantly different in the four immunosuppressive regimens studied (p < 0.001). The incidence of TMA was highest in the CsA + SRL group (20.7%). The relative risk of TMA was 16.1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3-60.8] for patients in the CsA + SRL group as compared with those in the FK + MMF group. We also investigated in vitro the pathophysiological basis of this association. The CsA-SRL combination was found to be the only regimen that concomitantly displayed pro-necrotic and anti-angiogenic activities on arterial endothelial cells. We propose that this combination concurs to development of TMA through dual activities on endothelial cell death and repair.     

Lower extremity arterial revascularization in obese patients

BACKGROUND: Obesity and associated comorbidities are associated with a high rate of complications and technical difficulties after a number of surgical procedures. We studied the role of obesity in outcomes in lower extremity arterial revascularization. METHODS: We reviewed all lower extremity arterial revascularizations performed at our institution in 2000. Body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m(2) defined obesity. Perioperative outcomes, long-term survival, and graft patency were evaluated in obese and nonobese patients by using linear regression, the Fisher exact test, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 74 (26%) obese and 207 (74%) nonobese patients. Patient demographics of the obese and nonobese populations were similar. The mean BMI for obese patients was 35 +/- 5 kg/m(2) and in nonobese patients was 25 +/- 3 kg/m(2). The mean age of each group was 67 +/- 10 years (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)) and 70 +/- 13 years (BMI <30 kg/m(2)). There were 45 (61%) obese men and 29 (39%) obese women. There were 128 (62%) nonobese men and 79 (38%) nonobese women. Diabetes was present in 76% of the obese and 70% of the nonobese patients. Perioperative myocardial infarction, 30-day mortality, and rate of reoperation within 30 days were not significantly different. Obese patients had higher increased postoperative wound infection rates (16% vs 7%; P = .04). Survival analysis showed 81% +/- 5% and 85% +/- 3% 1-year survival and 66% +/- 6% and 62% +/- 3% 3-year survival in obese and nonobese patients (P = .58), respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed no effect of obesity on long-term graft patency, with 1-year graft patency rates of 82% +/- 6% and 81% +/- 4% in obese and nonobese patients, respectively (P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients have similar limb salvage rates, perioperative cardiac morbidity, long-term survival rates, and long-term graft patency but have increased perioperative wound infections.     

Obesity as a predictor of biochemical recurrence and survival after radiation therapy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: Obesity has been demonstrated to predict biochemical progression in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma, and is associated with a higher risk of biochemical and clinical relapse after radiation therapy (RT). We evaluated if obesity, determined by body mass index (BMI), is associated with adverse disease characteristics, pre-treatment serum testosterone, biochemical disease free survival (bDFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), or overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing radical external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 706 patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma treated with RT between 1993 and 2001 were categorized as obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) or normal (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)). The association between BMI, disease characteristics, and progression were evaluated by Chi-square and ANOVA tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: 195 patients (27.6%) were normal weight, 358 (50.7%) were overweight and 153 (21.7%) were obese. Obese men had lower serum testosterone levels than overweight and normal-weight men (means 12.8, 14.1, and 15.7 nmol/L, respectively; p < 0.001). The BMI groups did not differ in Gleason score, pretreatment PSA, or stage. On multivariate analysis, BMI group was predictive of reduced bDFS (p = 0.02) and DSS (p = 0.008), with a trend toward reduced OS (p = 0.062). CONCLUSION: Obesity was associated with lower serum testosterone levels but not with adverse pretreatment pathological features. Obese men have a higher risk of biochemical recurrence and prostate-cancer specific death after RT.     

The impact of sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids on wound healing in 513 kidney-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether there has been an increase in the incidence or severity of wound-healing complications that can be attributed to the introduction of newer immunosuppressive drugs. METHODS: Consecutive series of adult kidney-only transplant recipients were selected from our Unified Transplant Database backward from September 2002. There were 513 patients divided into groups on the basis of their maintenance immunosuppression given for at least the first 30 days posttransplant. Group I (152) was given sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone (SRL/MMF/P) between March 2000 and September 2002; group II (168) was given cyclosporine A (CsA)/MMF/P between January 1999 and July 2002; and group III (193) was given azathioprine (AzA)/CsA/P between January 1993 and December 1997. A classification system for wound-healing problems was developed, and each of the three groups was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: From groups III to II to I, there was a significant increase in mean age (42.4 vs. 49 years), percent of patients diabetic (17% vs. 29%), mean body mass index (BMI) (24.2 vs. 27.1 kg/m2), and percent BMI greater than 30 (13.5% vs. 27%). The cumulative percentage of all wound-healing problems between group I (19.7%) vs. group II (16.1%) and group III (15.6%) was not significantly different. The most significant risk factor was a recipient BMI greater than 30 (P=0.0012) and delayed graft function (P=0.0041). CONCLUSIONS: During a 10-year period marked by changing recipient demographics, the introduction of MMF and SRL did not result in a significant increase in transplant wound-healing complications. The most significant risk factor associated with transplant wound-healing complications remains body weight, which was the major influence for each of the immunosuppressive drug combinations described.     

Immunosuppression with Belatacept‐Based,Corticosteroid‐Avoiding Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1‐year, randomized, controlled, open‐label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept‐based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)‐based, steroid‐avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept‐mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept‐sirolimus (SRL), or TAC‐MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty‐nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept‐MMF, belatacept‐SRL and TAC‐MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two‐thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI‐ and steroid‐free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8–10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC‐MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC‐based regimen.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery in the morbidly and profoundly obese

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Obesity has been regarded as a relative contraindication to standard laparoscopic procedures. We evaluated the impact of morbid (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) and profound (BMI > 40 kg/m2) obesity on the results of hand-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery (HALRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1996 until October 2002, a total of 30 patients among 105 on whom HALRS was performed at our institution were morbidly obese, with a mean BMI of 35.8 kg/m2 (range 30.3-52.3 kg/m2). Eight patients were noted to have profound obesity, with a mean BMI of 44 kg/m2 (range 40.1-52.3 kg/m2). The HALRS procedures included radical nephrectomy in 23 patients, simple nephrectomy in 4, nephroureterectomy in 2, and partial nephrectomy in 1. At least one additional significant comorbidity was noted in 70% of these patients. We retrospectively evaluated the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in this group of obese patients. RESULTS: All procedures were performed successfully without the need for open conversion. The mean operative time was 262 minutes (range 125-361 minutes), and the mean estimated blood loss was 217 mL (range 50-600 mL). No transfusions or intraoperative complications occurred. The mean hospital stay was 4.1 days (range 2-13 days). There were 7 minor postoperative complications including ileus (N = 5), wound cellulitis (1), and urinary retention (1). No complications occurred in the profoundly obese patient subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery is safe and effective in the morbidly and profoundly obese patient.     

Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study.

Steroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation despite their adverse effects. The introduction of new immunosuppressant has improved the survival rates and prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. We conducted a randomized prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal at 6 months post-transplant between tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine A + MMF (CsA group). Steroid was withdrawn at 6 months post-transplant under the condition of no rejection episode proven by biopsy and maintenance of serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl. Fourteen recipients were excluded because of acute rejection within 6 months or protocol violation. Steroid could be tapered off in 62 in FK group and 55 in CsA. Three cases in FK group and five in CsA had acute rejection within another 6 months after steroid withdrawal (P > 0.05). At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes was 18.6% vs. 8.0% in FK and CsA group. And hypercholesterolemia was presented in 8.5% vs. 2.0%, hypertension in 47.5% vs. 56.0%, and serum creatinine level 1.18 +/- 0.24 mg/dl vs. 1.18 +/- 0.20 mg/dl, respectively (P > 0.05). Steroid withdrawal may be carried out successfully using both FK and CsA with MMF, but long-term follow-up is necessary.     

Alemtuzumab induction in deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: The use of alemtuzumab for induction therapy in kidney transplantation has been increasing. Herein is a report of graft outcomes associated with alemtuzumab induction from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. METHODS: A total of 14,362 deceased donor kidney transplants from 2003 to 2004 received no induction (n=4,364), antithymocyte globulin (ATG; n=4,930), interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RA; n=4,378), or alemtuzumab (n=690). Acute rejection within the initial hospitalization, 6 months, and 1 year; graft survival; and rejection-free survival were examined. Graft and rejection-free survival of alemtuzumab recipients maintained with tacrolimus (FK) or cyclosporine (CSA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids versus no calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), MMF, and steroids were compared. RESULTS: Alemtuzumab recipients had less acute rejection during the initial hospitalization (2.3%) than no induction, ATG, and IL-2RA (7.6%, 3.4%, and 4.8%, respectively; P<0.001). There was increased acute rejection at 6 months and 1 year with alemtuzumab (14.5% and 19.2%) compared to no induction (12.7% and 14.8%, P<0.001), ATG (8.2% and 10.2%, P<0.001), and IL-2RA (11.1% and 13.0%, P<0.001) with no difference in adjusted relative risk for graft loss. Alemtuzumab recipients receiving FK or CSA, MMF, and steroids had increased graft (FK/MMF/steroids, P<0.001, CSA/MMF/steroids, P=0.007) and rejection-free survival (FK/MMF/steroids, P<0.001, CSA/MMF/steroids, P=0.006) over 24 months compared to no CNI, MMF, and steroids. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reduced early rejection, acute rejection rates at 6 months and 1 year with alemtuzumab induction exceeded other forms of induction therapy. Maintenance with CNI-based immunosuppression may improve graft and rejection-free survival compared to CNI-free regimens among alemtuzumab recipients.     

Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression with sirolimus in renal transplantation: a randomized, controlled Spare-the-Nephron trial

As part of the Spare-the-Nephron trial, we evaluated the combination mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen for the preservation of renal function in renal allograft recipients. This 2-year, open-label, multicenter trial randomized 299 patients of which 151 were maintained on MMF and a CNI, 148 on MMF plus SRL (n=120, tacrolimus; n=31, cyclosporine). Baseline characteristics including measured (iothalamate) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups. After 1 year, the mean percentage change from baseline in the primary end point of measured GFR was significantly higher in the MMF/SRL group compared with the MMF/CNI group. After 2 years, the change was indistinguishable. Calculated creatinine clearance and GFR were significantly greater with MMF/SRL at 2 years within which biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 14 MMF/SRL-treated patients (3 graft losses) and in 17 receiving the MMF/CNI (6 graft losses). Significantly, no patients receiving MMF/SRL but five treated with MMF/CNI died. Thus, compared with MMF/CNI treatment, a 2-year regimen of MMF/SRL resulted in similar measures of renal function but with fewer deaths and a trend to less BPAR and graft loss.     

A calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and anti-CD25 mAb provides effective immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation is a significant risk factor for early acute rejection and graft loss. Sirolimus (SRL) can be administered in the setting of DGF without exacerbating the impaired renal function after transplantation. We examined a calcineurin-sparing regimen using SRL during the early post-operative period in renal transplant patients with delayed or impaired graft function. A retrospective review of 14 consecutive kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function who received SRL was performed. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of daclizumab induction (2 mg/kg), SRL (5-15 mg load followed by 2 5 mg daily maintenance therapy), corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1.5-3 g/d). Patients were monitored for allograft function, acute rejection, graft survival, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. Serum levels of SRL were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography performed at an independent commercial laboratory. Donors were cadaveric in 13 cases and living related in one. The duration of follow-up was 0.5-5.2 months. Nine patients required hemodialysis after transplantation. The mean time to initiation of calcineurin inhibitors was 21 +/- 13 d. Average serum creatinine levels at the initiation of SRL and at 1 month after transplantation were 8.4 +/- 2.7 and 2.1 +/- 1.2 mg/dL, respectively. There were 2 patients (14%) who experienced acute rejection within the first month after transplantation -1 with type I (steroid therapy) and 1 with type II (anti-thymocyte therapy). Serum levels of SRL were initially undetectable in the 2 patients with acute rejection. No grafts were lost during the period of follow-up. Three patients developed thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100 x 10(9)) and no patients developed leukopenia. The combination of SRL with anti-CD25 mAb, MMF, and corticosteroids appears to provide effective non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression for kidney transplantation without the need for a lymphocyte-depleting regimen. However, it is important to monitor serum SRL levels to determine the optimal dosing regimen. Furthermore, long-term follow-up of these patients will be helpful to determine whether improved immunosuppression can be achieved with a fully calcineurin-sparing regimen using SRL.     

Steroid withdrawal five days after renal transplantation allows for the prevention of wound-healing complications associated with sirolimus therapy

Abstract: Background: Sirolimus (SRL) can increase the risk of wound complications. In this study, we investigated the impact of steroids when added to SRL, in this side effect. Methods: One hundred and forty‐eight patients entered prospective studies comparing early (fifth day) with late (sixth month) steroid withdrawal. All patients were on SRL, added either to Tacrolimus (n = 56) or to cyclosporine (n = 97). At 15th day after transplantation, 68 patients were on steroids (On‐St group) and 80 were not (Off‐St group). Wound complications considered were as follows: dehiscence, lymphocele, wound leakage, hematoma and seromas. Risk factors under analysis were as follows: body mass index, diabetes, rejection, creatininemia, length of dialysis before transplantation, recipient age, being on steroids at 15th day, SRL levels. Results: The overall incidence of wound complications was significantly lower in Off‐St group than in On‐St group: 18.8% vs. 45.6%, respectively (p < 0.0004). In detail, lymphocele: 5.0% vs. 32.3% (p < 0.0001); dehiscence 0% vs. 10.3% (p < 0.009), leakage 6.2% vs. 8.8% (p = NS), seromas 1.4% vs. 7.5% (NS). At multivariate analysis, the addition of steroids to SRL increases 4.2‐fold the risk for wound complications. Conclusions: Early steroid withdrawal is effective in preventing both the incidence and the severity of wound‐healing complications because of SRL regime, even when started with a loading dose.