Phase I trial using a time-to-event continual reassessment strategy for dose escalation of cisplatin combined with gemcitabine and radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of cisplatin that could be added to full-dose gemcitabine and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients were treated. Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) was administered over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Cisplatin followed gemcitabine on days 1 and 15. The initial dose level of cisplatin was 30 mg/m(2), escalated to a targeted dose of 50 mg/m(2) using Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method. RT was initiated on cycle 1, day 1, in 2.4 Gy fractions to a total dose of 36 Gy. A second cycle of chemotherapy was planned following a 1-week rest. RESULTS: Four of eight patients experienced acute dose limiting toxicity at the 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin dose level. Patients treated at 30 and 40 mg/m(2) cisplatin dose level tolerated therapy without dose-limiting toxicity. Median survival was 10.7 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 18.2) for all patients, and 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 21.2) for those without metastasis. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin at doses up to 40 mg/m(2) may be safely added to full-dose gemcitabine and conformal RT. The Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method trial design allowed rapid completion of the study and confidence in the conclusion about the maximum tolerated dose, but accrued more patients to a dose level above the maximum tolerated dose than the typical phase I design. Local and systemic disease control and survival in this study cohort supports further investigation of gemcitabine-based RT and combination chemotherapy in this disease.     

Phase I trial of strictly time-scheduled gemcitabine and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Maximal therapeutic gain in xenograft sarcoma and toxicity for jejunal mucosa is time dependent for concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy (RT). We used a time-dependent schedule to determine the maximal-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; Grade 4 hematologic or Grade 3 other toxicity). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 33), periampullary carcinoma (n = 1), or bile duct cancer (n = 2) were treated with 3-day conformal RT with 50.4 Gy (tumor, lymphatics) plus a 5.4-Gy boost. Concurrent cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1-5 and 29-33) and gemcitabine (initially 600 mg/m(2), weekly on Fridays 68 h before RT) were administered. Because of DLT, the doses were reduced to 500 mg/m(2) weekly and then 500, 400, or 300 mg/m(2) on Days 2, 5, 26, 33. RESULTS: DLT occurred at all dose levels of gemcitabine >300 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients were treated at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2)) without DLT. The response to chemoradiation allowed 10 of 30 initially unresectable patients with primary pancreatic carcinoma to undergo radical surgery, including a complete response in 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: At the recommended Phase II dose, chemoradiation with gemcitabine and cisplatin can be administered safely in pancreatic carcinoma. However, at higher dose levels, toxicity is severe and frequent. Patients with a chance for conversion to resection could benefit from this schedule.     

A phase I study of radiation therapy and twice-weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: In vitro studies suggest that low-dose gemcitabine sensitizes cells to radiation therapy and that this effect persists for 48 h after drug exposure. Cisplatin is a radiation sensitizer and is also synergistic with gemcitabine in some in vitro tumor systems. Gemcitabine's radiosensitizing properties can theoretically be exploited by twice-weekly administration. This study assessed toxicity in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radiation therapy, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic or gastric cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine and cisplatin were given twice weekly for 3 weeks during radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). The starting dose of gemcitabine was 5 mg/m(2) i.v. The starting dose for cisplatin was 5 mg/m(2). Chemotherapy doses escalated every 3 to 6 patients according to a standard Phase I study design. RESULTS: Twenty-four evaluable patients, all with pancreatic cancer, were treated on this protocol. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 2 patients, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2, and Grade 4 lymphopenia occurred in 1. There was no clear relationship between chemotherapy dose and hematologic toxicity. The most common Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxic responses were vomiting (7 patients) and nausea (7 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 2 of 3 patients at dose Level 6 (gemcitabine 45 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.). Six patients were treated at dose Level 5 (gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.) without dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly may be given concurrently with radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) with acceptable toxicity.     

Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of regional pancreatic carcinoma: a phase II study

In locally advanced pancreatic cancer, the utilization of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is increasing, although in view of the reported long-term results of several contemporary trials, further improvements are certainly needed. Encouraging results using the combination of cisplatin, cytarabine, caffeine, and continuous infusion (CI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PACE) for the treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma prompted a phase II study using PACE followed by external beam radiotherapy with CI of 5-FU (PACE-RT) for localized disease. Forty-one patients were treated with PACE-RT as adjuvant therapy after surgical resection (21 patients), or as primary therapy for locally advanced, unresectable disease (20 patients), with reevaluation for resection after completion of treatment. PACE consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV on day 1, cytarabine 2 g/m2 IV every 12 hours x 2 doses, and caffeine 400 mg/m2 subcutaneously after each cytarabine dose; and days 3 to 21, 5-FU 250 mg/m2/d given by CI. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. After 2 cycles of PACE, radiation therapy was given concurrently with 5-FU at 200 mg/m2/d. In the adjuvant setting, the tumor bed and the draining lymph node basin received 50.4 Gy and 45 Gy, respectively. In the neoadjuvant setting, the primary and regional lymph nodes were to receive 39.6 Gy followed by a neutron boost of 8 NGy to the gross tumor volume. Photon therapy was delivered at 1.8 Gy per fraction and neutron therapy at 0.8 NGy per fraction, 5 days a week. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and survival. The most common toxicity was myelosuppression, with grade III to IV neutropenia occurring in 59% of the patients. The median survival times in the locally advanced and adjuvant patients were 13.4 and 18.1 months, with 1-year survival rates of 52% and 65%, respectively. Nine of 20 patients receiving PACE-RT for unresectable carcinoma had sufficient tumor regression to meet clinical criteria for exploration; three were resected with curative intent. The survival of these three patients undergoing resection after neo-adjuvant therapy was 22.4, 24.3 and 40 months. The treatment program was active, but only moderately well tolerated. Modification of this regimen with newer, less toxic drugs may provide better results and reduced toxicity.     

Gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil for nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Gemcitabine has been shown to be an active agent in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This study was conducted to prospectively examine the tolerance and early efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Twenty-three patients, median age 64 years, were treated with combined modality therapy. Nine patients underwent tumor resection before chemoradiation; 14 patients with locally unresectable tumors received definitive chemoradiation. Radiotherapy utilized four fields to the tumor and lymphatics to 45 Gy, plus a lateral boost to 50.4 Gy. Concurrent 5-FU 500 mg/m(2)/day was administered on days 1-3 and 29-31, followed by 4 months of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2)/week for 3 weeks (fourth week break). Adjuvant gemcitabine was well tolerated. Eighty-three percent of the patients completed three to four cycles. The primary dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia, which was observed in 10 patients (43%). Nonhematologic toxicities were reported in five patients (22%). There were no cases of gemcitabine-induced radiation recall and there have been no deaths attributed to treatment toxicity. Median follow-up for the 23 patients was 12 months (range, 5-50); the actuarial median survival was 13 months. This report confirms that adjuvant gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be safely administered.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and infusional fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of adding infusional fluorouracil (FU) to the chemotherapy doublet of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that was either unresectable or metastatic. No prior gemcitabine therapy was allowed. Patients received a combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8, and 15; cisplatin 50 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 15; and FU 175 mg/m2/d from days 1 to 15 by continuous IV infusion. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Objective tumor response and toxicity were evaluated according to the World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (median age, 57 years; males, 59%) were enrolled. Sixteen patients had locally advanced (LA) disease, and 31 patients had metastatic disease. A total of 183 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. In patients with metastatic disease (n = 31), the probability of survival at 6 and 12 months was 66% and 34%, respectively. Objective partial response or stable disease was observed in 26% (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.14 to 0.41) and 61% (90% CI, 0.45 to 0.74) of patients, respectively. In patients with LA disease (n = 16), there were three partial responses (19%; 90 CI, 0.07 to 0.39). One patient in this group was successfully resected after FU-based radiotherapy. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (42%), and anemia (26%). Thirteen patients were hospitalized for treatment-related complications. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and infusional FU has significant activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy, and radiotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience

Approximately 25% of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) prove unresectable at surgery and the median survival of stage III MPM is <12 months even after complete resection by extrapleural pneumonectomy. From 1939-2004, a series of sequential clinical trials has been performed at our institution. The surgical procedure has been modified and improved upon, and adjuvant hemithoracic radiation (RT) standardized. The evolution of our current standard of care for MPM is discussed. Improving chemotherapy for MPM led us to test induction chemotherapy followed by EPP and adjuvant RT for locally advanced MPM to assess feasibility. Patients with T3-4 or N2 MPM by CT and PET scans were enrolled on a phase II study. Induction therapy was: gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 days 1, 8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 day 8)x2-4 cycles. Patients underwent EPP 3-5 weeks after induction therapy, then 54 Gy RT 4-6 weeks postop. At surgery, 8/9 had complete resection by EPP with no postoperative deaths. All received planned adjuvant RT. This combined modality approach is feasible for locally advanced MPM, and initial analysis suggests improved resectability. This experience supports additional studies of induction and multimodality therapy, especially with regimens such as cisplatin and pemetrexed which may be better tolerated and more effective.     

Phase I study of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this therapy. Four chemotherapy cycles of CPT-11 (days 1, 8 and 15) and cisplatin (day 1) were repeated every 28 days. Radiotherapy of 2 Gy/day commenced on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle with 20 Gy administered from the first to the third cycles (a total of 60 Gy). 17 patients were enrolled at three dose levels (CPT-11/cisplatin: 40/60, 50/60 and 60/60 mg/m(2)), and 16 were evaluable for toxicity and outcome. 2 of 4 patients at 60/60 mg/m(2) refused continuation of therapy because of general fatigue, and the relative dose intensity of CPT-11 at 50/60 mg/m(2) was approximately 50%. These levels were considered as the MTD. Tumour responses included four complete responses (CR), 11 partial responses (PR) and one no change (NC), and the overall response rate was 93.8% (95% confidence interval: (CI) 71.7-98.9%). This combined modality is tolerable, and CPT-11/cisplatin of 40/60 mg/m(2) in this modality is recommended for phase II study.     

Toxic cure: Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and fluorouracil for Stage III and IVA head-and-neck cancer in the community

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of the Duke University chemoirradiation regimen for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer in a regional community cancer center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 1998 and June 2002, 50 patients with Stage III or IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated definitively with concurrent combined modality therapy (CMT). Patients received accelerated, hyperfractionated radiotherapy (AFRT), 1.2-1.25 Gy b.i.d., to a median prescribed dose of 70 Gy. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin 12 mg and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) daily for 5 consecutive days during Weeks 1 and 6, followed by two cycles after AFRT. Patients with N2-N3 neck disease (n = 21; 42%) were considered for neck dissection depending on their response to AFRT and chemotherapy. Twenty-nine patients with Stage III and IVA disease treated between 1991 and 1997 with definitive RT alone served as historical controls. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (98%) in the CMT group completed the prescribed AFRT and 38 (76%) completed four cycles of chemotherapy. Three of 8 patients who underwent neck dissection had a pathologically complete response. The median follow-up for all patients was 23 months. The actuarial progression-free survival rate at 2 years was 75% for the CMT group vs. 40% (p <0.01) for the RT group. The overall survival rate was 80% and 43% (p <0.01), respectively, for the CMT and RT groups. Acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 toxicities for the CMT group were mucosal (n = 50; 100%), skin (n = 9; 18%), and hematologic (n = 3; 6%). Late Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of pharyngeal stricture (n = 7; 14%), laryngeal chondritis (n = 3; 6%), osteoradionecrosis (n = 2; 4%), and peripheral neuropathy (n = 1; 2%). CONCLUSION: This aggressive regimen of AFRT with concurrent cisplatin and fluorouracil with or without neck dissection is feasible in the community setting for patients with Stage III and IVA head-and-neck cancer. Early results indicated excellent survival, albeit with universal acute mucosal, and considerable, although acceptable, late toxicity.     

Phase I study of weekly gemcitabine as a radiation sensitizer for unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximal tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) in patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients who had locally advanced or recurrent unresectable pancreatic cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-min infusion once weekly for a total of five cycles during the course of RT. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 350 mg/m(2)/wk. Doses were escalated by increments of 25% in successive cohorts of 3-6 patients. RT was delivered at 180 cGy/d to a total dose of 5400-5580 cGy to the gross tumor volume. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were entered in this study through three dose levels (350-550 mg/m(2)/wk). The maximal tolerated dose was determined to be 440 mg/m(2)/wk. The DLTs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and failure to receive all five cycles of gemcitabine. Other non-DLTs included 16 Grade III toxicities, which consisted of thrombosis, infection, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, constipation, diarrhea, and fatigue. One patient at each gemcitabine dose level experienced Grade IV vomiting, and the patient at the 550 mg/m(2) dose developed Grade IV anorexia. CONCLUSION: The maximal tolerated dose of gemcitabine when administered as a 30-min infusion once weekly during RT for unresectable pancreatic cancer was found to be 440 mg/m(2)/wk. The DLTs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and failure to receive all five cycles of chemotherapy. Concurrent gemcitabine and RT is reasonably well tolerated and deserves additional evaluation against the current standard of care.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin and capecitabine in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and correlative study of angiogenic factors

The combination of cisplatin and capecitabine was evaluated in patients with recurrent or unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), and outcome parameters were correlated with the expression of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), thymidilate syntetase (TS), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1-3, and microvessel density (MVD). Patients with recurrent or unresectable HNSCC were eligible if they had received prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, or no prior systemic therapy. Patients received cisplatin (75 mg m(-2) day 1), and capecitabine (2000 mg m(-2) day 1-14) every 3 weeks. A total of 41 patients received 194 cycles. In all, 16 complete responses (39%) and 12 partial responses (29%) were documented, for an overall response rate of 68% (95% CI, 53-80%). Grade 3-4 uncomplicated neutropenia was documented in five subjects. Asthenia, anorexia, hand-foot syndrome, and constipation were the most frequent nonhaematologic events. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.4 and 12.6 months. Cytoplasmic TP expression was more prevalent in patients with a laryngeal location vs other, and in patients with a recurrence vs primary disease. Microvessel density count was higher in patients with recurrent vs primary disease. The combination of cisplatin and capecitabine is effective in recurrent or unresectable HNSCC, and shows a manageable toxicity.     

Combined radiochemotherapy of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mitomycin C plus 24-hour continuous infusional gemcitabine

BACKGROUND: In locally advanced pancreatic cancer, the combination of chemotherapy with radiotherapy is gaining increasing importance; although, in view of the reported long-term results of several contemporary trials, further improvements are certainly warranted. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined-treatment modality consisting of systemic chemotherapy with 24-h continuous infusional gemcitabine and mitomycin C, plus external beam radiotherapy in patients with localized unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Systemic chemotherapy consisted of mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 given as i.v. bolus injection on day 1 and gemcitabine administered as a 24-h continous infusion once weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 100 mg/m2 and dose levels were escalated in consecutive cohorts of 3-6 patients to 130 and 160 mg/m2, utilizing an escalating-dose Phase I trial design. Radiation therapy using megavolt irradiation (total dose, 45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/day) of 6 MV photons or greater with a 3- or 4-field technique was delivered concurrently for 5-6 weeks. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and August 1998, a total of 15 patients were enrolled in this trial, all of whom were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. The dose-limiting toxicities at the 160 mg/m2 gemcitabine level were myelosuppression, specifically neutropenia +/- thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal symptoms, including stomatitis, vomiting, and diarrhea. Only 1 partial response was observed (7%), and disease was stabilized in 10 additional patients (67%). The median time to progression was 5.5 months (range, 2-12 months). Whereas all patients developed distant metastases, locoregional failure occurred in only 3. The median survival time was 8.3 months (range, 2.5 to 22.0+ months), and the 1-year survival rate was 13.3%. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when given as prolonged infusion in combination with mitomycin C and radiation therapy was 130 mg/m2/week. Therapeutic results suggest that combined chemoradiation with this regimen is feasible and effective for local control of pancreatic cancer, but essentially ineffective in counteracting metastatic tumor growth.     

Concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy in routine management of cervical cancer: a report on patient compliance and acute toxicity

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient compliance and acute toxicity accompanying concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy (RT) in the routine management of cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Locally advanced or high-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients treated with RT and concurrent weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) i.v. (maximum dose, 70 mg) for five cycles. Definitive RT included whole pelvis external beam RT to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements reference dose of 40 Gy plus a 10-Gy boost to the parametrium and two brachytherapy applications of 20 Gy to point A each. Postoperative RT consisted of pelvic external beam RT to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements reference dose of 50 Gy and one brachytherapy application of 30 Gy at a depth of 0.5 cm from the applicator surface. RESULTS: Included in this analysis were 112 consecutive cervical cancer patients treated at one institution with concurrent cisplatin and RT between May 1999 and September 2002. The median age was 48 years (range, 28-79 years). Definitive RT was administered to 57 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics "bulky" Stage IB or IIB-IVA patients, and 53 patients underwent postoperative RT; 2 patients underwent RT for stump carcinoma. All but 2 patients (both administered definitive RT) completed RT. A total of 454 cisplatin cycles were administered (median 4 cycles/patient, range 1-6). Overall, 74% of patients received at least four cycles of cisplatin. The planned five cisplatin cycles were administered to 50 patients (45%); 42% were irradiated definitively and 47% postoperatively. The full and timely planned cisplatin dose was administered to 29 patients (26%). For 29% of patients, the interval between cycles was prolonged because of toxicity (n = 11; 10%) or for reasons not related to toxicity (n = 10; 9%). Of the 112 patients, 62 (55%) did not undergo the planned five cycles of cisplatin because of treatment toxicity (n = 35; 31%) or noncompliance with the treatment schedule because of delayed administration of the first cycle or omission of a cycle for reasons other than toxicity (n = 23; 21%). The most common side effects resulting in chemotherapy discontinuation included GI complications (n = 7) and impaired renal function (n = 5). Of the 112 patients, 49 (44%) experienced Grade 1 or 2 leukopenia and 6 (5%) Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. CONCLUSION: Our results show that pelvic RT combined with weekly cisplatin in cervical cancer patients is accompanied by considerable acute toxicity. Furthermore, a number of patients were unable to comply with the treatment schedule owing to reasons unrelated to treatment toxicity. Thus, administration of the full chemotherapy dose may be difficult, although the delivery of planned RT was generally not compromised. Additional follow-up is needed to assess the late toxicity of combined modality treatment.     

Phase I study of concomitant gemcitabine and IMRT for patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

Purpose: We hypothesized that dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) would protect normal tissues enough to allow the escalation of either the gemcitabine or radiotherapy dose in unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. Methods and Materials: The trial was designed to build on a previous phase I trial that determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine (350 mg/m²) with concurrent radiotherapy (30 Gy/10 fractions). Only patients with unresectable disease based on established criteria were eligible. The plan was to alternate escalating the radiation dose by 3 Gy and the gemcitabine dose by 50 mg/m². The starting dose of gemcitabine was 350 mg/m² and 33 Gy/11 fractions of IMRT to the regional lymphatics and primary disease. The NCl Common Toxicity Criteria were used for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: All three patients in the first cohort treated suffered DLT. Therefore, a second cohort of patients received a lower gemcitabine dose (250 mg/m²). Both patients treated at this dose level experienced DLT. The DLTs were all due to myelosuppression and upper gastrointestinal toxicity. All patients required a gemcitabine dose reduction. Also, four patients required hospital admission for supportive care, while the fifth died of an unrelated cause shortly after completing therapy. The trial was then closed due to excessive toxicity. Conclusion: Hypofractionated dynamic IMRT to the primary site and regional lymphatics did not permit escalation of either the radiation or gemcitabine dose. Dynamic IMRT requires further investigation before it can be applied to toxic combinations of chemotherapy and radiation in the upper abdomen.     

A phase I study of concurrent radiotherapy and capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for operable rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of capecitabine with standard radiotherapy (RT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer after surgery were eligible. Total RT dose was delivered as DT 50 Gy in fractions of 2.0 Gy/day for 5 weeks to the pelvic area. Capecitabine was administered concurrently with RT in escalating doses, twice daily with a 12-h interval, for two cycles of 14 days separated by a 7-day rest. Dose-limiting toxicity included Grade 3 or Grade 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled at the following dose levels: 1,000 (3 patients), 1,200 (3 patients), 1,400 (3 patients), 1,500 (3 patients), 1,600 (6 patients), and 1,700 mg/m2/day (6 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 1 patient at 1,600 mg/m2/day (Grade 3 diarrhea) and in 2 patients at 1,700 mg/m2/day (1 patient had Grade 3 and 1 Grade 4 diarrhea). CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine given concurrently with RT was 1,600 mg/m2, daily from the 1st to the 14th day, with a 7-day rest, for two cycles.     

A phase II study of mitomycin C, cisplatin and protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic carcinoma: efficacy and low toxicity.

BACKGROUND: The effective treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma represents a formidable challenge. There is a need to develop systemic therapies which combine efficacy with acceptable toxicity. The current 'gold standard' gemcitabine gives an objective response rate of the order of 20% and median survival up to 6 months. Here we have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of mitomycin C, cisplatin and protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil (MCF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with locally advanced (13 patients) or metastatic (32 patients) pancreatic carcinoma were treated with mitomycin C 7 mg/m(2) 6 weekly, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) 3 weekly and protracted venous infusion 5-FU 300 mg/m(2)/day. Patients were evaluated for response after three cycles and received six cycles in total in the absence of progressive disease or poor tolerance. Median age was 62 (45-75) years; 41 patients were World Health Organization performance status 0-1. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated with 36 (84%) patients completing three or more cycles. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were uncommon: anaemia in three patients (7%), mucositis in two (5%), nausea and vomiting in three (7%) and diarrhoea in one (1%). An objective response was seen in 21 (46%) patients. There was one complete response. The median survival overall was 7.1 months and 10.5 months in responders. The median duration of response was 4.3 months. One-year survival was 29%, 2-year survival was 18%. CONCLUSIONS: MCF combines efficacy with low toxicity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The efficacy is at least comparable and may be superior to single-agent gemcitabine and MCF may therefore provide a cost-effective alternative.     

Gemcitabine,paclitaxel, and radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. The initial dose level was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks. Concurrent radiation to 50.4 Gy was delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions. The radiation fields included the primary tumor, plus the regional peripancreatic, celiac, and porta hepatis lymph nodes. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, and anorexia occurred in 3 of 3 patients at the second dose level of gemcitabine, 150 mg/m(2)/week. An intermediate dose level of gemcitabine, 110 mg/m(2)/week, was added, but gastrointestinal toxicity and pulmonary pneumonitis were encountered. The MTD therefore was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and concurrent radiation. Two of 11 patients treated at the MTD had Grade 3/4 toxicity. Four of 10 assessable patients treated at the MTD responded (40%), including one pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dosage of gemcitabine is 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and conventional 50.4 Gy radiation fields. A Phase II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study is under way.     

Phase II study to evaluate combining gemcitabine with flutamide in advanced pancreatic cancer patients

A phase II study was undertaken to determine the safety of combining flutamide with gemcitabine, with response rate being the primary end point. Twenty-seven patients with histologically proven, previously untreated, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received gemcitabine, 1 g m(-2) intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle, and flutamide 250 mg given orally three times daily. Treatment was halted if there was unacceptable toxicity, or evidence of disease progression. Toxicity was documented every cycle. Tumour assessment was undertaken after cycles 2 and 4, and thereafter at least every additional four cycles. One hundred and seventeen cycles of treatment were administered, median four cycles per patient (range 1-18). Gemcitabine combined with flutamide was well tolerated, with most toxicities being recorded as grade 1 or 2 and only nine treatment cycles associated with grade 3 toxicity. The most frequent toxicity was myelosuppression. One case of transient jaundice was recorded. The commonest symptomatic toxicity was nausea and vomiting. The response rate was 15% (four partial responses), median survival 6 months and 22% of patients were alive at 1 year. These results suggest antitumour activity of the combination therapy to be equivalent to single agent gemcitabine.     

Gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9810)

PURPOSE: The purpose of this open-label phase II SWOG study was to evaluate the activity of gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly, Indiana, USA) and cisplatin combination therapy, in patients with unresectable malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty eligible chemotherapy na?ve patients with histologically proven malignant mesothelioma of the pleura, and a SWOG performance status 0-2 were enrolled between February 1999 and August 2000. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000mg/m(2) and cisplatin 30mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, until progression of disease or two cycles beyond complete response. RESULTS: Using SWOG response criteria, one patient had a confirmed complete response and five patients had a confirmed partial response, for a total response rate of 12% (95% CI 5-24%). All the responses were seen in patients with epithelioid or unspecified histology. Stable disease was seen in 25 patients (50%). The median overall survival was 10 months (95% CI 7-15 months), with a median progression-free survival of 6 months. Sixteen patients experienced Grade 4 toxicity. Twelve of these Grade 4 toxicities were hematologic. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin-gemcitabine combination chemotherapy has modest activity with an acceptable toxicity profile, as first line treatment for patients with malignant mesothelioma.