Daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to the interleukin 2 receptor (CD25), for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose ranging trial

BACKGROUND: An uncontrolled pilot study demonstrated that daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to the interleukin 2 receptor (CD25), might be effective for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of daclizumab induction therapy in patients with active ulcerative colitis. A total of 159 patients with moderate ulcerative colitis were randomised to receive induction therapy with daclizumab 1 mg/kg intravenously at weeks 0 and 4, or 2 mg/kg intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6, or placebo. The primary end point was induction of remission at week 8. Remission was defined as a Mayo score of 0 on both endoscopy and rectal bleeding components and a score of 0 or 1 on stool frequency and physician's global assessment components. Response was defined as a decrease from baseline in the Mayo score of at least 3 points. RESULTS: Two per cent of patients receiving daclizumab 1 mg/kg (p = 0.11 v placebo) and 7% of patients receiving 2 mg/kg (p = 0.73) were in remission at week 8, compared with 10% of those who received placebo. Response occurred at week 8 in 25% of patients receiving daclizumab 1 mg/kg (p = 0.04) and in 33% of patients receiving 2 mg/kg (p = 0.30) versus 44% of those receiving placebo. Daclizumab was well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events in daclizumab treated patients compared with placebo treated patients were nasopharyngitis (14.6%) and pyrexia (10.7%). CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate ulcerative colitis who are treated with daclizumab are not more likely to be in remission or response at eight weeks than patients treated with placebo.     

Once daily high dose probiotic therapy (VSL#3) for maintaining remission in recurrent or refractory pouchitis

BACKGROUND: Ten to 15% of patients with pouchitis experience refractory or recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a single daily high dose probiotic preparation (VSL#3) in maintaining antibiotic induced remission, and quality of life (QOL), for one year in such patients. METHODS: Patients with pouchitis at least twice in the previous year or requiring continuous antibiotics, associated with a pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) > or =7 (0 = perfect; 18 = worst), in whom remission was induced by four weeks of combined metronidazole and ciprofloxacin, were randomised to receive VSL#3 6 g or placebo once daily for one year or until relapse. Symptomatic, endoscopic, and histological evaluations were made before, and two and 12 months after randomisation or at the time of relapse. Remission was defined as a clinical PDAI < or =2 and endoscopic PDAI < or =1. Relapse was defined as an increased clinical PDAI score > or =2 and increased endoscopic PDAI score > or =3. QOL was assessed using the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). RESULTS: Thirty six patients were randomised: 20 to VSL#3 and 16 to placebo. Remission was maintained at one year in 17 patients (85%) on VSL#3 and in one patient (6%) on placebo (p<0.0001). The IBDQ score remained high in the VSL#3 group (p = 0.3) but deteriorated in the placebo group (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: The once daily high dose probiotic VSL#3 is effective in maintaining antibiotic introduced remission for at least a year in patients with recurrent or refractory pouchitis. This is associated with a high level of quality of life.     

Probiotic administration in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis is associated with expansion of mucosal regulatory cells

BACKGROUND: Probiotics have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and appear to regulate mucosal immune response through reductions in proinflammatory cytokines. The probiotic VSL#3 prevents pouchitis if started within a week of ileostomy closure and maintains remission following antibacterial treatment in patients with refractory or recurrent pouchitis. However, the efficacy of probiotics and their effects on regulatory cells if started at a greater time after surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis are unknown. METHODS: We conducted an open-label study in which 31 patients at different periods from surgery without signs and symptoms of pouchitis were randomized to 2 sachets of VSL#3 once daily or no treatment for 12 months. Pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) was evaluated at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The percentage of CD4+ T lymphocytes expressing CD25 and the inactive form of transforming growth factor-beta [latency-associated peptide (LAP)] were evaluated at baseline and after 3 and 6 months in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells and mucosal biopsies. Variation in tissue interleukin-1beta and Foxp3 mRNA expression was also evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period, VSL#3-treated patients showed a significant reduction in PDAI score and a significant increase in the percentage of mucosal CD4+CD25(high) and CD4+ LAP-positive cells compared with baseline values. Tissue samples at different points showed a significant reduction in IL-1beta mRNA expression, and a significant increase in Foxp3 mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that VSL#3 administration in patients with IPAA modulates the PDAI and expands the number of mucosal regulatory T cells.     

Medical therapy for induction and maintenance of remission in pouchitis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of medical therapy (including metronidazole, bismuth carbomer enemas, oral probiotic bacteria, butyrate suppositories, and glutamine suppositories) for inducing a response or for maintaining remission in pouchitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Studies were selected using the MEDLINE data base (1966-December 1997), abstracts from major gastrointestinal meetings, and references from published articles and reviews. Selection criteria: Four randomized controlled trials of medical therapy in adult patients with pouchitis were identified: two placebo controlled trials in active chronic pouchitis; one maintenance of remission trial comparing two active agents in chronic pouchitis; and one placebo-controlled maintenance of remission trial for chronic pouchitis. A single patient "n-of-1" trial for active chronic pouchitis was excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by three independent observers based on the intention to treat principle. Extracted data were converted to 2 x 2 tables (response versus no response and medical therapy versus placebo or medical therapy versus medical therapy) and an odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined as described by Cochrane and Mantel and Haenszel. In addition, the absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction, and number needed to treat were determined. MAIN RESULTS: The odds ratios of inducing a response using oral metronidazole or bismuth carbomer foam enemas compared with placebo in active chronic pouchitis were 12.34 (95% CI 2.34-64.95) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.29-3.42), respectively. The odds ratio of maintaining remission in chronic pouchitis for oral probiotic bacteria (VSL-3) compared with placebo was 15.33 (95% CI 4.51-52.14). There was no difference in the odds ratio of inducing symptomatic remission and then maintaining symptomatic remission after discontinuing suppressive medical therapy for chronic pouchitis with glutamine suppositories compared with butyrate suppositories, 2.75 (95% CI 0.48-15.94). CONCLUSIONS: Metronidazole is an effective therapy for active chronic pouchitis. Bismuth carbomer foam enemas are not effective therapy for active chronic pouchitis. Oral probiotic therapy with VSL-3 is an effective therapy for maintaining remission in patients with chronic pouchitis in remission. There is no difference in maintenance of symptomatic remission in patients with chronic pouchitis treated with glutamine versus butyrate suppositories, and it is unknown whether glutamine and butyrate are equally effective or ineffective. Additional randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trials are needed to determine the efficacy of empiric medical therapies currently being used in patients with pouchitis.     

Adalimumab in the treatment of chronic pouchitis. A randomized double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

Background: Pouchitis is a complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and occurs in up to 50% of patients 10 years after IPAA with 10% developing refractory pouchitis.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a TNF-α inhibitor (Adalimumab) in the treatment of refractory pouchitis.

Materials and methods: A multicenter, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial includes patients with refractory pouchitis for more than 4 weeks despite antibiotic treatment. Patients were randomized to Adalimumab or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was reduction in clinical pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) of ≥2 at any time. Secondary endpoints were remission of pouchitis, endoscopic and histologic effect and quality of life.

Results: Thirteen patients were included; six patients received active treatment and seven patients received placebo. Nine patients (5/4, Adalimumab/placebo) completed the 12-week program. Reduction in clinical PDAI ≥ 2 was achieved in three patients in each group (50%/43%, Adalimumab/placebo, p?>?.5). Total PDAI improved in six patients treated with Adalimumab and two patients on placebo (100%/29%, p?=?.13). There were no differences in secondary endpoints between the groups.

Conclusions: In this randomized controlled trial of treatment with Adalimumab in patients with refractory pouchitis, we were not able to identify any clinical benefit in the primary or secondary endpoints.     

A randomized clinical trial of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole to treat acute pouchitis.

Metronidazole is effective for the treatment of acute pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, but it has not been directly compared with other antibiotics. This randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the effectiveness and side effects of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole for treating acute pouchitis. Acute pouchitis was defined as a score of 7 or higher on the 18-point Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) and symptom duration of 4 weeks or less. Sixteen patients were randomized to a 2-week course of ciprofloxacin 1,000 mg/d (n = 7) or metronidazole 20 mg/kg/d (n = 9). Clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histologic features were assessed before and after therapy. Both ciprofloxacin and metronidazole produced a significant reduction in the total PDAI score as well as in the symptom, endoscopy, and histology subscores. Ciprofloxacin lowered the PDAI score from 10.1+/-2.3 to 3.3+/-1.7 (p = 0.0001), whereas metronidazole reduced the PDAI score from 9.7+/-2.3 to 5.8+/-1.7 (p = 0.0002). There was a significantly greater reduction in the ciprofloxacin group than in the metronidazole group in terms of the total PDAI (6.9+/-1.2 versus 3.8+/-1.7; p = 0.002), symptom score (2.4+/-0.9 versus 1.3+/-0.9; p = 0.03), and endoscopic score (3.6+/-1.3 versus 1.9+/-1.5; p = 0.03). None of patients in the ciprofloxacin group experienced adverse effects, whereas three patients in the metronidazole group (33%) developed vomiting, dysgeusia, or transient peripheral neuropathy. Both ciprofloxacin and metronidazole are effective in treating acute pouchitis with significant reduction of the PDAI scores. Ciprofloxacin produces a greater reduction in the PDAI and a greater improvement in symptom and endoscopy scores, and is better tolerated than metronidazole. Ciprofloxacin should be considered as one of the first-line therapies for acute pouchitis.     

Oral beclomethasone dipropionate in chronic refractory pouchitis

BackgroundPouchitis is the major long-term complication after ileal-pouch anal-anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Ten to 15% of patients develop chronic pouchitis, either treatment responsive or treatment refractory.AimTo evaluate the efficacy of oral beclomethasone dipropionate in inducing remission and improving quality of life in patients with chronic refractory pouchitis.MethodsTen consecutive patients with active pouchitis, not responding to 1-month antibiotic treatment, were treated with beclomethasone dipropionate 10 mg⁄day for 8 weeks. Clinical, endoscopic and histological evaluations were undertaken before and after treatment, according to the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). Remission was defined as a combination of PDAI clinical score of ≤ 2, endoscopic score of ≤ 1 and a total PDAI score of ≤ 4. The quality of life was assessed with the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ).ResultsEight of 10 patients (80%) achieved remission. The median total PDAI scores before and after therapy were, respectively, 12 (range 8–14) and 3 (range 2–9) (P < 0.001). The median IBDQ score also significantly improved from 120 (range 77–175) to 175 (range 85–220) (p < 0.001).ConclusionEight-week treatment with oral beclomethasone dipropionate appears effective in inducing remission in patients with active pouchitis refractory to antibiotic treatment.     

Natalizumab for the treatment of active Crohn's disease: results of the ENCORE Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of natalizumab induction therapy in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: Patients (N = 509) with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and active inflammation characterized by elevated C-reactive protein concentrations were randomized (1:1) to receive natalizumab 300 mg or placebo intravenously at Weeks 0, 4, and 8. The primary end point was induction of response (> or =70-point decrease from baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index score at Week 8 sustained through Week 12). Additional efficacy end points included the proportion of patients with sustained remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index score <150 points) and response or remission over time. RESULTS: Response at Week 8 sustained through Week 12 occurred in 48% of natalizumab-treated patients and 32% of patients receiving placebo (P < .001). Sustained remission occurred in 26% of natalizumab-treated patients and 16% of patients receiving placebo (P = .002). Week 4 response rates were 51% for natalizumab and 37% for placebo (P = .001). Responses remained significantly higher at subsequent assessments (P < .001) in natalizumab-treated patients. Natalizumab-treated patients also had significantly higher remission rates at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (P < or = .009). The frequency and types of adverse events were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab induced response and remission at Week 8 that was sustained through Week 12. Response and remission rates for natalizumab were superior to those for placebo at Weeks 4, 8, and 12, demonstrating the early and sustained efficacy of natalizumab as induction therapy in patients with elevated C-reactive protein and active Crohn's disease. Natalizumab was well tolerated in this study.     

Oral spherical adsorptive carbon for the treatment of intractable anal fistulas in Crohn's disease: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES:  Anal fistulas are common in individuals with Crohn's disease (CD). We sought to evaluate the efficacy of oral spherical adsorptive carbon (AST-120) (Kremezin^®; Kureha Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) for the treatment of intractable anal fistulas in patients with CD.
METHODS:  In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with CD and at least one active anal fistula under treatment were assigned to receive either AST-120 or placebo for 8 wk. Improvement was defined as a reduction of 50% or more from baseline in the number of draining fistulas observed at both 4 and 8 wk. Remission was defined by closure of all draining fistulas at both 4 and 8 wk. The Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) were also assessed.
RESULTS:  In total, 62 patients were randomized, of whom 57 received AST-120 (N = 27) or placebo (N = 30). The improvement rate in the AST-120 group (37.0%) was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (10.0%) ( P = 0.025). The corresponding remission rates were 29.6% and 6.7%, respectively ( P = 0.035). PDAI significantly improved at both 4 and 8 wk with AST-120, compared to placebo ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.005, respectively). CDAI was also significantly improved at both 4 and 8 wk in the AST-120 group, compared to the placebo group ( P = 0.007 and P = 0.001, respectively). AST-120 treatment was well tolerated and no life-threatening adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSION:  AST-120 is useful for the control of intractable anal fistulas in CD patients.     

Leukocytapheresis for the treatment of active pouchitis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is a major long-term complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of leukocytapheresis for the treatment of active pouchitis. METHODS: Eight patients with active pouchitis received leukocytapheresis weekly for 5 weeks in an open-label treatment protocol together with baseline therapy. RESULTS: Patients showed significant improvement in their pouchitis disease activity index scores, from 9.5 (range, 8-10) to 4.0 (range, 2-8) (P < 0.05). Six (75%) of the 8 treated patients achieved remission. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Leukocytapheresis therapy could be a new therapeutic strategy for patients with pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. These encouraging results lead us to propose a randomized controlled trial.     

Endoscopic and histologic evaluation together with symptom assessment are required to diagnose pouchitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pouchitis often is diagnosed based on symptoms alone. In this study, we evaluate whether symptoms correlate with endoscopic and histologic findings in patients with ulcerative colitis and an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: Symptoms, endoscopy, and histology were assessed in 46 patients using Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). Patients were classified as either having pouchitis (PDAI score > or =7; N = 22) or as not having pouchitis (PDAI score <7; N = 24). RESULTS: Patients with pouchitis had significantly higher mean total PDAI scores, symptom scores, endoscopy scores, and histology scores. There was a similar magnitude of contribution of each component score to the total PDAI for the pouchitis group. Of note, 25% of patients with symptoms suggestive of pouchitis did not meet the PDAI diagnostic criteria for pouchitis. In both groups, the correlation coefficients between symptom, endoscopy, and histology scores were near zero (range, -0.26 to 0.20; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The symptom, endoscopy, and histology scores each contribute to the PDAI and appear to be independent of each other. Symptoms alone do not reliably diagnose pouchitis.     

Diagnosis and treatment of pouchitis

Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical procedure of choice for the management of ulcerative colitis. Pouchitis, a non-specific inflammation of the ileal reservoir, is the most frequent complication that patients experience in the long-term. Diagnosis should be made on the basis of clinical, endoscopic and histological aspects. The Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) represents an objective and reproducible scoring system for pouchitis: active pouchitis is defined as a score > or = 7 and remission as a score < 7. About 15% of patients develop a chronic disease. Treatment of pouchitis is empirical, and very few controlled studies have been carried out. Antibiotics, particularly metronidazole and ciprofloxacin, are the treatment of choice. Chronic pouchitis may benefit from a prolonged course of a combination of antibiotics. Highly concentrated probiotics are effective for both prevention of relapses and prevention of pouchitis onset. There is no convincing evidence of the efficacy of other therapeutic agents.     

5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas: effective agent in maintaining remission in left-sided ulcerative colitis

The efficacy of 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas in maintaining remission in left-sided ulcerative colitis was studied. Twenty-five patients in remission for at least 2 mo were randomized to receive either 1-g 5-aminosalicylic acid or placebo enemas daily and were followed up for 1 yr. Eleven of 13 patients randomized to placebo relapsed after a mean of 16 wk. Nine of 12 patients randomized to 5-aminosalicylic acid remained in remission for 1 yr, 2 others in remission withdrew by request, and 1 relapsed at 10 wk. The difference between relapse rate on 1-g 5-aminosalicylic acid versus placebo was significant (p less than 0.005). Seven patients entered the blinded trial a second time. Three of 4 patients randomized to 5-aminosalicylic acid remained in remission and 1 relapsed. Three randomized to placebo relapsed at a mean of 14 wk. One-gram 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas are safe and effective in maintaining remission in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis.     

Safety of celecoxib in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission: a randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The safety of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission is unknown. METHODS: We performed a placebo-controlled pilot trial to evaluate the safety of celecoxib in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission who had a present or past history of nonspecific arthritis, arthralgia, or other condition amenable to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. A total of 222 patients with ulcerative colitis in remission were randomized to receive oral celecoxib 200 mg or placebo twice daily for 14 days. Remission was defined as a total Mayo Clinic score of 2 points or less and an endoscopic score of 1 point or less. Disease exacerbation was defined as a total Mayo Clinic score of 5 points or more and an increase in the endoscopic score of 1 point or more. The primary analysis was disease exacerbation through day 14 among patients who underwent randomization, had at least 1 dose of study drug, and had both endoscopy and Mayo Clinic disease activity index scores at the baseline and final assessments. RESULTS: Three percent of patients in the celecoxib group experienced disease exacerbation through day 14, as compared with 4% in the placebo group (P = .719). Eleven percent of patients in each group experienced a bowel-related adverse event (P > .20). CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with celecoxib for up to 14 days did not have a greater relapse rate than placebo in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission who had a present or past history of nonspecific arthritis, arthralgia, or other condition amenable to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy.     

Randomized double blind trial of an ayurvedic plant derived formulation for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate RA-1, a standardized plant extract formulation, traditionally considered a safe, effective antiarthritic in the Asian-Indian Ayurvedic medicinal system. METHODS: One hundred eighty-two patients with active-on-chronic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) participated in a 16 week randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel efficacy clinical drug trial in Pune, India. Tenderness, pain, swelling, and several other efficacy measures were assessed by (1) ACR core set 20% and 50% improvement; (2) ACR 20% improvement response. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed; p<0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Seventeen patients withdrew (active = 9; placebo = 8); none withdrew due to drug toxicity. An unprecedented placebo response (often p<0.001 in within-group change) was observed. The active RA-1 group remained numerically superior at all evaluation timepoints. RA-1 demonstrated few significant differences: (1) increased proportion with 50% reduction in swollen joint count (95% CI approximately 1.52, 29.90) and swollen joint score (95% CI approximately 0.91, 28.73); (2) reduced rheumatoid factor (95% CI approximately -303.7, -2.72); 39% in the RA-1 group versus 30% placebo showed ACR 20% improvement (95% CI approximately -5.48, 24.59). Only minor side effects were seen, with no significant differences by treatment group. CONCLUSION: In a trial with sufficient power, RA-1 revealed efficacy that was not significantly superior to the strong placebo response, except for improvement in joint swelling. Further, the effect on RF and good safety profile led to an open label phase.     

Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn's disease: the CHARM trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, a fully human, anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody administered subcutaneously, in the maintenance of response and remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Patients received open-label induction therapy with adalimumab 80 mg (week 0) followed by 40 mg (week 2). At week 4, patients were stratified by response (decrease in Crohn's Disease Activity Index > or =70 points from baseline) and randomized to double-blind treatment with placebo, adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), or adalimumab 40 mg weekly through week 56. Co-primary end points were the percentages of randomized responders who achieved clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index score <150) at weeks 26 and 56. RESULTS: The percentage of randomized responders in remission was significantly greater in the adalimumab 40-mg eow and 40-mg weekly groups versus placebo at week 26 (40%, 47%, and 17%, respectively; P < .001) and week 56 (36%, 41%, and 12%, respectively; P < .001). No significant differences in efficacy between adalimumab eow and weekly were observed. More patients receiving placebo discontinued treatment because of an adverse event (13.4%) than those receiving adalimumab (6.9% and 4.7% in the 40-mg eow and 40-mg weekly groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who responded to adalimumab, both adalimumab eow and weekly were significantly more effective than placebo in maintaining remission in moderate to severe CD through 56 weeks. Adalimumab was well-tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with previous experience with the drug.     

Corticosteroid injections in polymyalgia rheumatica: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of shoulder corticosteroid injections in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with active PMR were randomized into a 7 month, double blind, placebo controlled study. Patients received either bilateral shoulder injections of 40 mg of 6-methylprednisolone acetate or placebo (1 ml saline solution). Responders were treated weekly with the same regimen for a total of 4 bilateral injections and then followed for 6 months. Response was defined as a 70% reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and for patient and physician global assessment, and duration of morning stiffness. Bilateral shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at different times to evaluate the response of lesions to therapy. RESULTS: All 10 corticosteroid treated patients responded to the first injection with a significant reduction in duration of morning stiffness, VAS pain scale, patient and physician global assessment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. Interleukin 6 serum levels were significantly reduced after the 2nd injection. In 5 patients, the response persisted throughout the followup period. The other 5 withdrew within 4 weeks after the 4th injection due to recurrence of symptoms. None of the 10 patients of the placebo group responded to the first injection. The difference between the 2 groups was significant (p = 0.03). No side effects were recorded. MRI showed marked improvement of shoulder lesions one week after first injection and an almost complete resolution one week after last injection in the responders. CONCLUSION: Shoulder corticosteroid injections seem to be an effective and safe therapy for PMR.     

IgG, albumin, and sCD44 in whole-gut lavage fluid are useful clinical markers for assessing the presence and activity of pouchitis

Pouchitis is the most significant long-term complication in patients with ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IAP) and is especially frequent in patients with ulcerative colitis. There is an urgent need for simple and objective parameters to assess the presence and activity of pouchitis. Whole-gut lavage fluid (WGLF) was collected from 34 patients [8 with pouchitis (PDAI > or = 7 points) and 26 without pouchitis (Pouchitis Disease Activity Index, PDAI, < 7)]. Patients with active ulcerative colitis (n = 8) served as controls. Concentrations of IgG and sCD44 in WGLF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and those of albumin by immunoturbidimetry. Similar to the case in active ulcerative colitis, concentrations of IgG, albumin, and sCD44 in WGLF were significantly increased in acute pouchitis and reached high specificity (IgG 96%, albumin 96%, sCD44 100%) and acceptable sensitivity (75%) for the diagnosis of acute pouchitis. These parameters were also closely correlated with disease activity as determined by PDAI and endoscopic scoring indices. Assay of protein concentrations in WGLF is thus a simple and objective means for grading inflammation of the pouch and may be useful as a quantitative index of disease activity in clinical studies.     

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of a humanized monoclonal antibody to alpha4 integrin in active Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: alpha4 integrins are important mediators of leukocyte migration across vascular endothelium. This pilot placebo-controlled study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of natalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to alpha4 integrin, in patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's disease. METHODS: Thirty patients with active Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] > or =151 and < or =450) received a 3-mg/kg infusion of natalizumab (n = 18) or placebo (n = 12) by double-blind randomization. The study's primary endpoint was change in CDAI at week 2. RESULTS: At week 2, the CDAI decreased significantly from baseline after infusion of natalizumab (mean 45 points) but not placebo (mean 11 points). Seven (39%) natalizumab-treated patients achieved remission at week 2, compared with 1 (8%) treated with placebo. In contrast, 4 (33%) of the placebo-treated patients required rescue medication by week 2, compared with 2 (11%) natalizumab-treated patients. Significant increases in circulating B and T lymphocytes were detected only after natalizumab administration. The frequency of commonly reported adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A single 3-mg/kg natalizumab infusion was well tolerated by Crohn's disease patients, although the dose used may have been suboptimal. Elevated circulating lymphocyte levels after natalizumab suggest interrupted lymphocyte trafficking. Natalizumab therapy in active Crohn's disease merits further investigation.     

Efficacy of methotrexate in ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) compared with placebo in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: This 24 week, double bind, randomized, placebo controlled trial compared the response between MTX 7.5 mg/week or placebo in patients with active AS. The primary outcome measure was a composite index of improvement in 5 of the following scales: severity of morning stiffness, physical well being, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Health Assessment Questionnaire for Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S), and physician and patient global assessment of disease activity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received MTX and 18 placebo. In the intention-to-treat analysis at 24 weeks, 53% of patients in the MTX group had a treatment response, compared with 17% in the placebo group (p = 0.03). We observed significant improvements with MTX in physical well being (p = 0.009), BASDAI (p = 0.02), BASFI (p = 0.02), physician global assessment (p < 0.001), patient global assessment (p = 0.03), and HAQ-S (p = 0.02). In the adjusted analysis only MTX determined the improvement in the primary outcome. At the end of the trial, one patient with MTX withdrew due to a lack of compliance, and one with placebo due to a lack of efficacy. We did not observe significant differences in rates of side effects between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: MTX is safe and effective for patients with AS. Longterm studies are needed to evaluate the permanence of its benefit.