Existence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with thoracic aortic dissections

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the coexistence or later development of pararenal and infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in patients with thoracic aortic dissections. METHODS: One hundred forty-five patients (95 men, 50 women) encountered from 1992 to 2001 with thoracic aortic dissections-excluding those associated with trauma, those with Marfan's syndrome, and those with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms-were studied. The most common risk factors included hypertension (59%) and a history of tobacco use (52%). Type III dissections affected 86 patients (59%), and type I dissections affected the remaining 59 patients (41%). Aortic computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained annually. Data were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Five patients (3%) had a history of AAA repair prior to their thoracic aortic dissection diagnosis-3 were type III dissections and 2 were type I dissections. Twelve patient's (8%) AAAs were diagnosed with the initial CT study of their thoracic aortic dissection. Type III dissections accounted for all but one of these (11 of 12, 92%). Ten additional AAAs (7%) developed in the 128 patients with no initial evidence of an AAA being recognized from 1 to 48 months (average 16 months) after the thoracic aortic dissection was diagnosed. Type III dissections affected 8 of these 10 patients. Among the total 27 AAAs noted in this series, 74% (20 AAAs) were not continuous with the thoracic aortic dissection. In the univariate analysis, age (P =.0002), male gender (P =.044), history of smoking (P =.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P <.001), duration of dissection (P =.05), and presence of type III dissection (P =.009) were associated with the presence of an AAA. In the multivariate analysis, both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI, 1.3 to 22.3; P =.02) and age (OR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.11; P =.004) were significant predictors of the development of AAAs. CONCLUSION: This study documented that patients with thoracic aortic dissections are at risk to harbor or develop a later AAA. This finding supports the tenet that abdominal CTs or ultrasound scanning should be mandatory in the follow-up of patients with known thoracic aortic dissections.     

Emergency surgery for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with acute presentation

PURPOSE: The mortality rate for elective repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is as low as 4% in some surgical centers. However, patients with emergent presentation with acute pain, rupture, or complicated acute dissection traditionally have a poor outcome. We evaluated the results of surgery in a large contemporary series of patients with acute presentation at a tertiary referral center with a special interest and experience in aortic surgery. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1998, 1220 patients underwent repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. One hundred twelve patients had acute presentation, and 1108 patients underwent elective repair. Data were collected in a prospectively generated database. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients had rupture, and 36 patients had acute dissection without rupture. The operative mortality rate was 6% for elective cases and 17% for acute cases (P =.0004). The long-term survival was longer for the elective group compared with the acute group (mean, 8.3 +/- 0.4 years versus 5.5 +/- 0.7 years; P <.005). Age did not influence survival rate in the acute group. Postoperative pulmonary complications, paraplegia/paraparesis, and renal impairment occurred in 45%, 14%, and 25%, respectively, of acute cases and were significantly more common than in elective cases (P < or =.01). Left heart bypass was used in 34 acute patients (30%), and intercostal arteries were reattached in 66 acute patients (59%). Surgery without the use of either adjunct was associated with significantly higher mortality and renal impairment rates. CONCLUSION: Repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with acute presentation is associated with worse outcome compared with elective cases. Nevertheless, repair may be performed with reasonable mortality and morbidity rates at specialized centers. In the acute setting, the use of surgical adjuncts is associated with improved outcome and should be used when possible. Age does not impact on survival rate in patients with acute presentation, and surgery should not be restricted to only younger patients.     

Surgical treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm after repairs of descending thoracic or infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair after operations for descending thoracic or infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm was investigated. METHODS: Between May 1982 and July 2000, 102 patients underwent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Of these patients, 36 had previously undergone operations for descending thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm. To evaluate the influence of previous descending thoracic or infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair on the results of TAAA replacement, patients were divided into two groups: one group of patients who had previously undergone descending thoracic or infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (group I, n=36) and one group of patients who had not previously undergone descending thoracic or infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (group II, n=66). RESULTS: Patients with previous descending thoracic or infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair had more chronic dissection and extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The distal aortic perfusion time and total aortic clamp time were both longer in group I. The total selective visceral and renal perfusion time and operation time did not differ significantly between the two groups. In 30-day mortality rates were 5.5% in group I and 13% in group II. Major postoperative complications included paraplegia in 14% of patients in group I and 3.1% in group II, renal failure requiring hemodialysis in 22% of patients in group I and 19% of patients in group II, respiratory failure in 36% of patients in group I and 30% of patients in group II, postoperative hemorrhage in 11% of patients in group I and 16% of patients in group II. CONCLUSION: The presence of a previous descending thoracic or infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm did not adversely affect the outcome of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.     

Paraplegia after endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence and aetiology of paraplegia secondary to endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta (TEVAR). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the patients treated at our facility between March 1997 and April 2007. During this interval, 173 patients (163 men; median age: 62 years) underwent endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. Indications for treatment were thoracic aortic aneurysms in 36 patients, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in 33 patients, type B dissections in 43 patients, type A dissections in 5 patients, penetrating aortic ulcers in 31 patients, traumatic aortic transections in 9 patients, post-traumatic aortic aneurysms in 5 patients, aortobronchial fistulas in 8 patients, aortic patch ruptures in 2 patients, and an anastomotic aortic aneurysm in 1 patient. 101 procedures (58%) were conducted as emergency interventions while 72 were elective. Device design and implant strategy were chosen on the basis of an evaluation of morphology from a computed tomographic scan. Clinical assessment and imaging of the aorta (CT or magnetic resonance imaging) during follow up were performed prior to discharge, at 6 and 12 months, and then annually. RESULTS: A primary technical success was achieved in 170 patients (98%). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 9.2%. Length of follow-up ranged from 1 to 96 months, with a mean of 52 months. Paraplegia or paraparesis developed in 3 patients (1.7%). Two of these patients had a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and the third a chronic expanding type B dissection, being treated with hybrid procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta is associated with a relatively low risk for postoperative paraplegia or paraparesis. Patients requiring long segment aortic coverage, and with prior aortic replacement are especially at risk.     

Complications of endovascular repair of high-risk and emergent descending thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections

PURPOSE: The advent of endovascular prostheses to treat descending thoracic aortic lesions offers an alternative approach in patients who are poor candidates for surgery. The development of this approach includes complications that are common to the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms and some that are unique to thoracic endografting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 60 emergent and high-risk patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and dissections treated with endovascular prostheses over 4 years under existing investigational protocols or on an emergent compassionate use basis. RESULTS: Fifty-nine of the 60 patients received treatment, with one access failure. Thirty-five patients received treatment of TAAs. Four of these procedures were performed emergently because of active hemorrhage. Twenty-four patients with aortic dissections (16 acute, 8 chronic) also received treatment. Eight of the patients with acute dissection had active hemorrhage at the time of treatment. Three devices were used: AneuRx (Medtronic; n = 31), Talent (Medtronic; n = 27), and Excluder (Gore; n = 1). Nineteen secondary endovascular procedures were performed in 14 patients. Most were secondary to endoleak (14 of 19), most commonly caused by modular separation of overlapping devices (n = 8). Other endoleaks included 4 proximal or distal type I leaks and 2 undefined endoleaks. The remaining secondary procedures were performed to treat recurrent dissection (n = 1), pseudoaneurysm enlargement (n = 3), and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n = 1). One patient underwent surgical repair of a retrograde ascending aortic dissection after endograft placement. Procedure-related mortality was 17% in the TAA group and 13% in the dissection group, including 2 acute retrograde dissections that resulted in death from cardiac tamponade. Overall mortality was 28% at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Although significant morbidity and mortality remain, endovascular repair of descending TAAs and dissections in patients at high-risk patients can be accomplished with acceptable outcomes compared with traditional open repair. The major cause for repeat intervention in these patients was endoleak, most commonly caused by device separation. Improved understanding of these complications may result in a decrease in secondary procedures, morbidity, and mortality in these patients. The need for secondary interventions in a significant number of patients underscores the necessity for continued surveillance.     

The effect of aortic dissection on outcome in descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

It is estimated that 20% to 40% of the patients who survive the acute phase of aortic dissection will develop significant aneurysmal dilatation of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta. Aortic dissection has long been considered a risk factor for mortality and neurologic deficit following surgical repair of the descending thoracic and/or thoracoabdominal aorta. In this article we review the surgical approach to patients with aortic dissection and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and discuss the impact of adjuncts on survival and neurologic outcome.     

Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases: combined experience from the EUROSTAR and United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the initial and 1-year outcome of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections collated in the European Collaborators on Stent Graft Techniques for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection Repair (EUROSTAR) and the United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries. METHODS: Four hundred forty-three patients underwent endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease between September 1997 and August 2003 (EUROSTAR, 340 patients; UK, 103 patients). Patients represented 4 major disease groups: degenerative aneurysm (n = 249), aortic dissection (n = 131), false anastomotic aneurysm (n = 13), and traumatic aortic injury (n = 50). RESULTS: Mean age in the entire study group was 63 years. Fifty-two percent of patients were deemed at high risk for open surgery because of major comorbidity. Sixty percent of patients underwent an elective procedure, and 35% required emergency treatment. Conventional indications for treatment of aortic dissection, including aortic expansion, continuous pain, rupture, or symptoms of branch occlusion constituted the basis for endograft placement in 57% of patients, whereas in 43% of patients aortic dissections were asymptomatic. Primary technical success was obtained in 87% of patients with degenerative aneurysm and in 89% with aortic dissection. Paraplegia was a postoperative complication in 4.0% of patients with degenerative aneurysm and 0.8% of patients with aortic dissection (not significant). Thirty-day mortality in the entire study group was 9.3%, with mortality rates after elective procedures of 5.3% for degenerative aneurysms and 6.5% for aortic dissection. Mortality for degenerative aneurysm after emergency repair was higher (28%; P <.0001) then after elective procedures. For aortic dissection the emergency repair rate was 12% (not significant compared with elective repair of aortic dissection, and P = .025 compared with emergency repair of degenerative aneurysm). One-year follow-up was complete in 195 patients. The outcome at 1 year was more favorable for aortic dissection than for degenerative aneurysm with regard to aortic expansion (0% vs 15%; P = .001) and late survival (90% vs 80%; P = .048). In the groups with false anastomotic aneurysm and traumatic aortic injury, 30-day mortality rates were 8% and 6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This multicenter experience demonstrates acceptable rates for operative mortality and paraplegia after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease. Outcome after 30 days and 1 year was more favorable for aortic dissection than for degenerative aneurysm. However, the durability of this technique is currently unknown, and continued use of registries should provide data from long-term follow-up.     

Spontaneous aortic dissection in the presence of coexistent or previously repaired atherosclerotic aortic aneurysm.

Acute aortic dissection occurred in 18 patients who had previously diagnosed atherosclerotic aneurysms of the thoracic and/or abdominal aorta. These patients were reviewed to assess the clinical course when these two forms of aortic pathology coexist. Patients were grouped according to status of their atherosclerotic aneurysm (previously repaired vs. untreated) and the segments of the aorta effected by the acute spontaneous dissection. Group 1 patients (n = 5) had previously undergone-abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy (AAA) repair, and the abdominal aortic suture line effectively terminated the dissection process. In Group 2 patients (n = 5), the acute dissection and the atherosclerotic aneurysm involved different segments of the aorta. Group 3 patients (n = 8) experienced spontaneous aortic dissection involving atherosclerotic aneurysms (five infrarenal, three thoracoabdominal), with threatened or actual rupture occurring in six patients, resulting in three deaths. In Group 3 patients, rupture occurred both at the atherosclerotic aneurysm (four patients) and at the site of the aortic intimal tear of the dissection (two patients) after AAA repair. The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has proven to be highly accurate in delineating the nature and extent of pathology in recently encountered patients with complicated aortic disease. Coexistence of atherosclerotic aneurysm and acute dissection appears to increase the risk of aortic rupture, in both proximal and distal aortic segments.     

Aortic fenestration for acute or chronic aortic dissection: an uncommon but effective procedure

BACKGROUND: Aortic fenestration is rarely required for patients with acute or chronic aortic dissection. To better define its role and the indications for its use and to evaluate its success at relieving organ or limb malperfusion, we reviewed our experience with direct fenestration of the aorta. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all consecutive aortic fenestrations performed between January 1, 1979, and December 31, 1999, was performed. Fourteen patients, 12 men and two women (mean age, 59.6 years; range, 43-81), underwent fenestration of the aorta. All patients were hypertensive and had a history of tobacco use. By Stanford classification, there were three type A and 11 type B patients. In the acute dissection group (n = 7), indications for surgery were malperfusion in six patients (leg ischemia, 4; renal ischemia, 5; bowel ischemia, 3) and intra-abdominal bleeding from rupture in two. In the chronic dissection group (n = 7), indications for surgery were abdominal aortic aneurysm in 4 patients (infrarenal, 3; pararenal, 1), thoracoabdominal aneurysm in 1, hypertension from coarctation of the thoracic aorta in 1, and aortic occlusion with disabling claudication in 1. RESULTS: Emergency aortic fenestration was performed in seven patients (surgically for 6 and percutaneously for 1). Fenestration level was infrarenal in four and pararenal in three. Concomitant abdominal aortic graft replacement was performed in four patients, combined with ascending aortic replacement (n = 1) and bilateral aortorenal bypasses (n = 1). In two patients, acute fenestration was performed for organ malperfusion after prior proximal aortic replacement (ascending aorta, 1; descending thoracic aorta, 1). Seven elective aortic fenestrations were performed for chronic dissection (descending thoracic aorta, 2; paravisceral aorta, 2; infrarenal aorta, 2 and pararenal aorta, 1). Concomitant aortic replacement was performed in six patients (abdominal aorta, 5; thoracoabdominal aorta, 1). Fenestration was successful at restoring flow in all 10 patients with malperfusion. Operative mortality for emergency fenestration was 43% (3/7). The three deaths that occurred were of patients with anuria or bowel ischemia, or both. There were no postoperative deaths for elective fenestration. At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, there were no recurrences of malperfusion and no false aneurysm formations at the fenestration site. CONCLUSION: Fenestration of the aorta can effectively relieve organ or limb ischemia. Bowel ischemia and anuria are indicators of dismal prognosis and emergency fenestration in these patients carries a high mortality. Elective fenestration combined with aortic replacement can be performed safely in chronic dissection. Aortic fenestration is indicated for carefully selected patients with malperfusion and offers durable benefits.     

Spontaneous dissection of the infrarenal abdominal aorta

Spontaneous infrarenal abdominal aortic dissection is rare. We observed enlargement of a spontaneous infrarenal aortoiliac dissection in a 55-year-old hypertensive man. Open surgical repair with a bifurcated polyester graft was successful. A review of the English literature found 41 previously published cases. Mean age was 58 years, 74% of the patients were male, and 62% had hypertension. None had Marfan or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. More than three fourths of the patients had symptoms, 6 patients (14%) presented with aortic rupture. Dissection was limited to the infrarenal aorta in 50% and extended into the iliac or femoral arteries in 50%. Three patients died before treatment, no death occurred after endovascular repair of after elective open aortic grafting. Mortality following rupture was 67%. Abdominal aortic dissection did not reoccur but 1 patient died at 14 month because of rupture of a thoracic aneurysm. Spontaneous infrarenal abdominal aortic dissections are rare, but usually symptomatic and 14% rupture. Rupture carries high mortality. Elective open repair is recommended, but endovascular repair is a new treatment option for suitable patients.     

Emergency surgery results in life-threatening thoracic aortic disease

OBJECTIVE: Emergency surgery for thoracic aortic aneurysm continues to involve high mortality. We review our experience in emergency surgery for life-threatening thoracic aortic disease. METHODS: Between September 1994 and June 2000, 65 consecutive patients--38 men and 27 women aged 18 to 84 years (mean: 64.3 years)--underwent emergency surgery for thoracic aortic disease. Of these, 40 (61%) were treated for acute type A dissection, 16 (25%) for aortic rupture, and 9 (14%) for impending aneurysmal rupture. Ascending aorta repair was conducted in 21, aortic arch repair in 30, distal arch repair in 2, descending aorta repair in 9, and thoracoabdominal aorta repair in 3. Of the 65, 42 were under 70 years old and 23 were 70 years of age and older. RESULTS: Overall, 8 (12%) died in the hospital--3 (7.5%) of acute type A dissection, 3 (19%) of ruptured aneurysm, and 2 (22%) of impending rupture. Of these, 3 (7.1%) were younger than 70 years and 5 (22%) 70 years and older. The following perioperative factors significantly influenced hospital mortality: pump time (p = 0.019), postoperative severe cardiac failure (p = 0.006), postoperative respiratory failure (p = 0.045), and postoperative acute renal failure (p = 0.0007). Of the 57 survivors followed up for an average of 2.8 years (1 month to 6 years), 3-year survival was 73% overall--88% in patients younger than 70 years and 38% in those 70 years and older (p = 0.0004). Seven of the 9 patients suffering strokes during surgery died in the hospital (2) or after discharge (5). Overall hospital and late deaths involved 2 of 4 patients younger than 70 years and all of 5 patients 70 years and older. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients undergoing emergency surgery for life-threatening thoracic aortic disease can undergo graft replacement with acceptable mortality, morbidity, and late survival, but early and late mortality for patients older than 70 remains extremely high.     

Hybrid procedures as a combined endovascular and open approach for pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies

OBJECTIVES: to report our experience with hybrid vascular procedures in patients with pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies. METHODS: 68 patients were treated for thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies between October 1999 and February 2004; 19 patients (16 men; mean age 68, range 40-79) with high risk for open thoracoabdominal repair were considered to be candidates for combined endovascular and open repair. Aortic pathologies included five thoracoabdominal Crawford I aneurysms, one postdissection expanding aneurysm, three symptomatic plaque ruptures (Crawford IV), five combined thoracic descending and infrarenal aneurysms with a healthy visceral segment, three juxtarenal or para-anastomotic aneurysms, and two patients with simultaneous open aortic arch replacement and a rendezvous maneuver for thoracic endografting. Commercially available endografts were implanted with standardized endovascular techniques after revascularization of visceral and renal arteries. RESULTS: Technical success was 95%. One patient developed a proximal type I endoleak after chronic expanding type B dissection and currently is waiting conversion. Nine patients underwent elective, five emergency and five urgent (within 24 h) repair. 17 operations were performed simultaneously, and 2 as a staged procedure. Postoperative complications include two retroperitoneal hemorrhages, and one patient required long-term ventilation with preexisting subglottic tracheal stenosis. Thirty-day mortality was 17% (one multiple organ failure, one secondary rupture after open aortic arch repair, one myocardial infarction). Paraplegia or acute renal failure were not observed. Total survival rate was to 83% with a mean follow-up of 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm results of combined endovascular and open procedures in the thoracoabdominal aorta are encouraging in selected high risk patients. Staged interventions may reduce morbidity.     

Endovascular treatment of complicated versus uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection

ObjectiveThe study objective was to analyze the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair performed for complicated and uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections.MethodsPatients from WL Gore's Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissections were included, and data were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsOf 5014 patients enrolled in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment, 172 underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissections. Of these repairs, 102 were for complicated acute type B aortic dissections and 70 were for uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections. There were 46 (45.1%) procedures related to aortic branch vessels versus 15 (21.4%) in complicated type B aortic dissections and uncomplicated type B aortic dissections (P = .002). The mean length of stay was 14.3 ± 10.6 days (median, 11; range, 2-75) versus 9.8 ± 7.9 days (median, 8; range, 0-42) in those with complicated type B aortic dissections versus those with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections (P < .001). Thirty-day mortality was not different between groups (complicated type B aortic dissections 2.9% vs uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections 1.4%, P = .647), as well as aortic complications (8.8% vs 5.7%, P = .449). Aortic event-free survival was 62.9% ± 37.1% versus 70.6% ± 29.3% at 3 years (P = .696).ConclusionsIn the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment, thoracic endovascular aortic repair results for complicated type B aortic dissections versus uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections showed that 30-day mortality and perioperative complications were equally low for both. The midterm outcome was positive. These data confirm that thoracic endovascular aortic repair as the first-line strategy for treating complicated type B dissections is associated with a low risk of complications. Further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to define the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated acute type B dissections compared with medical therapy. However, in the absence of level A evidence from randomized trials, results of the uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection patient cohort treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair from registries are important to understand the related risk and benefit.     

Endovascular treatment of type B thoracic aortic dissections

PURPOSE: To evaluate the initial experience of endovascular repair of aortic dissections from a single center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 1999 to March 2002, endovascular stent grafting was performed in 20 high-risk patients (16 to 80 years). Eighteen patients had a type B dissection (14 acute and 4 chronic). Two patients had chronic type A dissection. Preoperative work-up included CT and MRI to evaluate the extent of the dissection, the relation to the left subclavian artery, the size of false and true lumen, and branch complications. RESULTS: Stent-graft deployment was technically successful in all cases. None was converted to open repair. Three patients died within 30 days, i.e., a 15% mortality rate. Four patients (20%) had a perioperative stroke. Paraplegia was observed in one case. No migration of the stent grafts or endoleaks was observed during the mean follow-up period of 13 months. In all but two patient thrombosis of the false lumen was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of thoracic dissections is feasible. Early results are encouraging. While endovascular repair with stent-grafts is progressing rapidly as a viable strategy for aortic dissections in selected patients careful investigations must continue to focus on its safety. Randomized controlled trials are urgently needed.     

Surgical repair of aneurysms involving the suprarenal, visceral, and lower thoracic aortic segments: early results and late outcome

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to review our experience with surgical repair of lower thoracoabdominal and suprarenal aortic aneurysms to determine early and late survival rates and identify factors influencing morbidity and survival among these patients. MATERIALS: From 1989 through 1998, 165 consecutive patients underwent repair of 108 thoracoabdominal (55 group III and 53 group IV) and 57 suprarenal aneurysms. The study group consisted of 109 men and 56 women with a mean age of 70 years (median, 70 years; range, 29-89 years). Mean aneurysm diameter was 6.9 cm (median, 6.5 cm; range, 4-12 cm). There were 125 aneurysms (76%) repaired electively; 40 repairs (24%) were nonelective. The cause of 12 aneurysms (7%) was chronic aortic dissection; the remaining 153 (93%) were degenerative aneurysms. RESULTS: The early postoperative (30-day) mortality rates were 7% (9/125) for elective and 23% (9/40) for nonelective operations (P =.016). For both elective and urgent procedures, early mortality was 1.8% (1/57) for suprarenal aneurysm repair, 11% (6/53) for group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms, and 20% (11/55) for group III thoracoabdominal aneurysms (P =.013, suprarenal vs group III). Spinal cord ischemia occurred after 6% (10/165) of aneurysm repairs (4% paraplegia, 2% paraparesis). None of the 57 suprarenal aneurysm repairs were complicated by spinal cord ischemia, whereas it occurred in 2% (1/53) of group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms and 16% (9/55) of group III thoracoabdominal aneurysms (P =.001, suprarenal vs group III; P =. 016, group IV vs group III). Three (25%) of the 12 patients with dissection developed spinal cord ischemia; this compared with seven (5%) of 153 patients with degenerative aneurysms (P =.027). The cumulative 3-year survival rate for the entire series was 71% (95% CI, 64%-79%), and 5-year survival was 50% (95% CI, 40%-60%). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysms involving the suprarenal, visceral, and lower thoracic aorta may be repaired with acceptable perioperative mortality and late survival rates. The risk of spinal cord ischemia is increased for patients with aortic dissection and may be stratified according to the proximal extent of the aneurysm.     

Proximal aortic repair in dialysis patients: A national database analysis

ObjectivesDialysis is a well-established risk factor for morbidity and mortality after cardiovascular procedures. However, little is known regarding the outcomes of proximal aortic surgery in this high-risk cohort.MethodsPerioperative (in-hospital or 30-day mortality) and 10-year outcomes were analyzed for all the patients who underwent open proximal aortic repair with the diagnosis of nonruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm (aneurysm, n = 325) or type A aortic dissection (dissection, n = 461) from 1987 to 2015 using the US Renal Data System database.ResultsIn patients with aneurysm, perioperative mortality was 12.6%. The 10-year mortality was 81% ± 3%. Age 65 years or more (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.78; P = .03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.82; P = .047), and Black race (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09-1.97; P = .01) were independently associated with worse 10-year mortality. In patients with dissection, perioperative mortality was 24.3% and 10-year mortality was 87.9% ± 2.2%. Age 65 years or more (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.19-1.86; P < .001), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-2.57; P = .004), and diabetes mellitus as the cause of dialysis (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.2-2.57; P = .004) were independently associated with worse 10-year mortality. Black race (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.6-0.92; P = .008) was associated with a better outcome.ConclusionsWe described challenging perioperative and 10-year outcomes for dialysis patients undergoing proximal aortic repair. The present study suggests the need for careful patient selection in the elective repair of proximal aortic aneurysm for dialysis-dependent patients, whereas it affirms the feasibility of emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissections.     

Thoracic aortic emergencies: impact of endovascular surgery

BACKGROUND: Conventional surgery for thoracic aortic emergencies, such as contained or free rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms, acute type B dissections, and traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta, is frequently associated with a high rate of mortality and morbidity. To obviate this risk, endovascular surgery is considered to be a valid alternative procedure. METHODS: From March 2001 to July 2002, 15 of 22 patients with acute thoracic aortic syndromes were submitted to endovascular surgery: 3 patients (20%) for traumatic rupture, 4 patients (26.7%) for contained or free rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysm, and 8 patients (53.3%) for acute type B dissection evolving to rupture. Computed tomographic scan was diagnostic in all patients. The stent grafts were introduced through the femoral artery. RESULTS: In the endovascular group there were no perioperative deaths or open conversions. The intraoperative angiography and computed tomographic scan performed on discharge showed no significant endoleaks and successful sealing of the aortic dissection. Average intensive care unit and hospital stay was 1.7 +/- 0.8 and 5.9 +/- 3.0 days. Follow-up ranged between 4 and 23 months and included clinical examinations and serial computed tomographic scan at 3, 6, and 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. One 84-year-old patient with thoracic aortic aneurysm died of pneumonia 78 days after endovascular surgery. Only one type 1 endoleak was noted in the first patient with traumatic rupture, 3 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular surgery is a safe technique, showing encouraging early and midterm results and allowing for prompt treatment of associated lesions in complex multitrauma patients.     

Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair using cardiopulmonary bypass,profound hypothermia,and circulatory arrest via left side of the chest incision

Purpose: Although some authors advocate hypothermic circulatory arrest for spinal cord protection in descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal repair, this method has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in other studies. The safety and effectiveness of this surgical adjunct were evaluated. Methods: Between February 1991 and April 1997, 409 patients underwent thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Because of an inability to gain proximal aortic control because of anatomic or technical difficulty, hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 21 patients (4.9%). Thirteen patients were men, 8 were women, and the median age was 57 (range, 21 to 81 years). Four patients (19%) had Marfan's syndrome, and 1 had aortitis. Seven patients (33%) had aortic dissection (4 chronic type A, 2 chronic type B, 1 acute B), and 1 had aortic laceration. All but 6 patients had hypertension. Fifteen patients (73%) were operated on for repair of the distal arch and descending thoracic aorta, 4 (19%) for repair of the distal arch and thoracoabdominal aorta, and 2 for repair of either the thoracoabdominal or descending thoracic aorta alone. Surgery for 9 patients (43%) also included bypass grafts to the subclavian or innominate arteries. Six operations (29%) were urgent. Results: The overall 30-day mortality rate was 29% (6 of 21 patients). Among urgent patients, the mortality rate was 50% (3 of 6 patients) versus 20% (3 of 15) for elective patients. Of the remaining 15 patients, renal failure occurred in 1 (7%) and heart failure in 2 (13%). Ten patients (67%) had pulmonary complications. Encephalopathy occurred in 5 patients (33%) and stroke in 2 (13%), and spinal cord neurologic deficit developed in 2 (13%). The median recovery was 28 days (range, 10 to 157 days). Conclusion: Hypothermic circulatory arrest did not reduce the incidence of deaths and morbidity to a rate comparable with our conventional methods. We recommend the judicious application of this method in rare instances when proximal control is not feasible or catastrophic intraoperative bleeding leave the surgeon with no other option. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:591-8.)     

Endovascular repair of aortic rupture due to trauma and aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: to report a single centre experience with endovascular repair of the ruptured descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. DESIGN: prospective non-randomised study in a university hospital. MATERIAL and METHODS: between 1995 and 2000, endovascular treatment was utilised for 231 aortic repairs; in 37 cases (16%) endografting was conducted on an emergency basis for 21 ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms, 15 ruptured descending thoracic aortic lesions, and 1 ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The feasibility of endovascular treatment and the prostheses' size were determined, based on preoperative spiral CT and intraoperative angiography, both obtained in each patient. RESULTS: endografting was successfully completed in 35 patients (95%). Primary conversion to open repair was necessary in 2 patients (5%). Postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 11% (4 deaths). No patient developed postoperative temporary or permanent paraplegia. In 2 patients (5%) primary endoleaks required overstenting and in 6 patients (16%) secondary surgical interventions were required. Mean follow-up was 19 months (1-70 months); three deaths occurred within three months postoperatively (1-year survival rate 81+/-6%). In one case, secondary conversion to open repair was necessary 14 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: the feasibility of endoluminal repair of the ruptured aorta has been demonstrated. Endoluminal treatment may reduce morbidity and mortality, and may in time become the procedure of choice in certain centres. However, further follow-up is required to determine the long-term efficacy.     

Ruptured descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Advances in end-organ protection have dramatically reduced the incidence of the life-threatening complications associated with the elective repair of thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. However, in the setting of a ruptured thoracic aneurysm, one may not have the luxury of complex end-organ support. We analyzed our experience with ruptured thoracic aneurysms to define morbidity and mortality in the present era. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients with thoracoabdominal or descending thoracic aneurysms were operated on between July 1997 and October 2001. Forty presented with either a contained or free rupture. Three techniques were used for aortic reconstruction: clamp and sew, left heart bypass, and hypothermic circulatory arrest. Adjuncts for neurologic and renal support were used when circumstances and anatomy permitted. RESULTS: Seven of 40 patients died in the hospital (17.5%). Four patients died intraoperatively, all of acute myocardial infarction. Five of the seven deaths were in patients who presented in shock. Two patients (5%) experienced paraplegia, 3 (7.5%) had renal failure requiring hemodialysis, 8 (20%) required a tracheostomy, and 6 (15%) had recurrent nerve palsies. There was one stroke (2.6%). Mean diameter of ruptured aneurysms was 8.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Ruptured thoracic aneurysms can be repaired with a gratifying rate of salvage. Rapid diagnosis and triage for repair is necessary to avoid progressive deterioration into shock. The incidence of myocardial infarction, and the mortality associated with this event, underscores the need for aggressive cardiac evaluation in the elective thoracic aneurysm patient. The size at rupture also emphasizes the need for earlier referral for elective aneurysm repair.