IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 33,557 cases and 45,254 controls

Published data on the association between insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) A-202C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between them. A total of 27 studies including 33,557 cases and 45,254 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated breast cancer risk was associated with IGFBP3 C allele when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (CC vs. AA: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02–1.11; dominant model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00–1.07). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risk was found for Caucasians (AC vs. AA: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00–1.08; CC vs. AA: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01–1.10; dominant model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00–1.08) and Asians (CC vs. AA: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.02–1.78; recessive model: OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.05–1.82). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found among population-based studies (CC vs. AA: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01–1.11; dominant model: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.00–1.07). In the subgroup analysis by menopausal status, no statistically significantly increased risk was found among premenopausal or postmenopausal women. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the IGFBP3 C allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer.     

MTHFR C677T polymorphism associated with breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 15,260 cases and 20,411 controls

Published data on the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed with co-dominant model (CT vs. CC, TT vs. CC), dominant model (CT + TT vs. CC), and recessive model (TT vs. CC + CT), respectively. A total of 37 studies including 15,260 cases and 20,411 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated breast cancer risk was associated with TT variant genotype in homozygote comparison and dominant genetic model when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01–1.23; dominant model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00–1.09). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found for TT allele carriers among Asians (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04–1.35; recessive model: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03–1.29). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in hospital-based studies (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.02–1.38; recessive model: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05–1.29). In the subgroup analysis by menopausal status, statistically significantly increased risk was found among postmenopausal women (CT vs. CC: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02–1.23; dominant model: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01–1.22). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the MTHFR T allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer.     

Lack of association of CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism with breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 17,600 subjects

Published data on the association between cytochrome P-450 1A2 (CYP1A2)-164 A/C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for co-dominant model (AC versus AA, CC versus AA), dominant model (CC + AC versus AA), and recessive model (CC versus AA + AC), respectively. A total of 9 studies including 7,580 cases and 10,020 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significantly elevated breast cancer risk was found in all genetic models when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (AC versus AA: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.92–1.13; CC versus AA: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.83–1.64; dominant model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.93–1.23; and recessive model: OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.82–1.55). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity or source of controls, there was still no significant association detected in all genetic models. In conclusion, upto date, there is still no enough evidence to indicate the association of CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and breast cancer development.     

STK15 F31I polymorphism is associated with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 25,014 subjects

Published data on the association between STK15 F31I polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedicine Database were searched. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the STK15 F31I polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for codominant model (FI vs. FF; II vs. FF), dominant model (FI + II vs. FF), and recessive model (II vs. FI + FF), respectively. A total of 10 studies including 10,537 cases and 14,477 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated breast cancer risk was associated with II variant genotype in homozygote comparison and recessive genetic model when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (for II vs. FF: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.10–1.37; for recessive model: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05–1.40). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found for II allele carriers among Caucasians (for II vs. FF: OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.08–1.43; for recessive model: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.00–1.45); significantly increased risks were also found among Asians for II versus FF (OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.01–1.45). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the STK15 31II allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer.     

Screening RAD51C nucleotide alterations in patients with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide. Many published articles have evaluated the association between the transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) T29C polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, the results remain inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the association, a meta-analysis was performed in this study. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. A total of 12 studies including 10,417 breast cancer cases and 11,455 controls were identified. Overall, no significant associations between the TGFB1 T29C polymorphism and breast cancer risk were found for CC versus TT (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.92–1.09), TC versus TT (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93–1.05), CC/TC versus TT (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.93–1.05), and CC versus TC/TT (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93–1.08). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, source of controls, and menopausal status, there was still no significant association detected in all genetic models. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests that the TGFB1 T29C polymorphism is not a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer.     

Methionine synthase A2756G polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 18,953 subjects

The A2756G polymorphism in the methionine synthase (MTR) gene has been implicated in breast cancer risk. However, the published findings are inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to investigate this relationship. Eleven published case–control studies, including 8,438 breast cancer cases and 10,515 controls were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Overall, no significant associations between the MTR A2756G polymorphism and breast cancer risk were found for GG versus AA (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84–1.15), AG versus AA (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89–1.01), GG/AG versus AA (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.89–1.01), and GG versus AG/AA (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.86–1.17). However, in the stratified analysis, significantly decreased breast cancer risks were found among Europeans (AG versus AA, OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.83–0.98; GG/AG versus AA, OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82–0.97) and studies with population-based controls (AG versus AA, OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.86–1.00; GG/AG versus AA, OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.86–1.00). When stratifying by the menopausal status, no significant result was observed in all genetic models. Taken together, the results suggest that the MTR A2756G polymorphism may contribute to susceptibility to breast cancer among Europeans.     

Current evidence on the relationship between HRAS1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Several molecular epidemiological studies were conducted in recent years to evaluate the association between NQO1 Pro187Ser polymorphism and breast cancer risk in diverse populations. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. This meta-analysis on 3177 cases with breast cancer and 4038 controls from seven published case–control studies showed that the 187Ser allele was not associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer (Ser versus Pro: P = 0.33, OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.92–1.28; Ser/Ser versus Pro/Pro: P = 0.58, OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.68–2.00; Ser/Ser versus Pro/Ser + Pro/Pro: P = 0.62, OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.68–1.90; Ser/Ser + Pro/Ser versus Pro/Pro: P = 0.30, OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.94–1.22). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, we found that the Pro187Ser polymorphism was associated with increased breast cancer risk in Caucasians in the additive genetic model and dominant genetic model (P = 0.03, OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.01–1.26; P = 0.03, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01–1.30, respectively), whereas no significant in Asians (P = 0.44, OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.80–1.10) and postmenopausal women (P = 0.99, OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.84–1.19). The results suggest that NQO1 Pro187Ser polymorphism may contribute to breast cancer development in Caucasians.     

The association of SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: meta-analysis from 16 studies involving 23,445 subjects

Epidemiological studies on the association between SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the association, a meta-analysis was conducted in this article. Sixteen studies including 9,881 cases and 13,564 controls were collected for SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism by searching the databases of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and ISI Web of Knowledge. The strength of association between SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility was assessed by calculating crude ORs with 95% CIs. When all the 21 studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence for significant association between SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility (for Arg/Arg versus Arg/His: OR = 0.999, 95% CI = 0.941–1.061; for Arg/Arg versus His/His: OR = 1.121, 95% CI = 1.013–1.242; for dominant model: OR = 1.128, 95% CI = 1.01–1.26; for recessive model: OR = 1.151, 95% CI = 0.950–1.394). In the subgroup analysis by the source of controls, significant increased risk was found for hospital-based studies (for Arg/Arg versus Arg/His: OR = 1.173, 95% CI = 1.000–1.376; for Arg/Arg versus His/His: OR = 1.600, 95% CI = 1.134–2.256; for dominant model: OR = 1.269, 95% CI = 1.134–2.256; for recessive model: OR = 1.664, 95% CI = 1.070–2.588). In summary, the meta-analysis suggests that SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism may be associated with the hospital-based studies. However, large number of samples and representative hospital-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well-matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.     

SULT1A1 R213H polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 8,454 cases and 11,800 controls

The SULT1A1 R213H polymorphism is suggested to be implicated in the development and progression of breast cancer. However, the published findings are inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of 8,454 breast cancer cases and 11,800 controls from 14 published case–control studies. We used odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the strength of the association of the R213H polymorphism with breast cancer risk. Overall, our results suggested that there is no significant relationship between SULT1A1 R213H polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer. However, further ethnic population analysis revealed a significantly increased risk of breast cancer for HH allele carriers among Asians (for HH vs. RR: OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.11–4.63, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.63; for the recessive model: OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.00–4.41, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.62). Taken together, this meta-analysis suggests that the SULT1A1 R213H may be a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer in Asian population.     

Lack of association between CYP17 MspA1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 22,090 cases and 28,498 controls

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between CYP17 MspA1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed this meta-analysis. Systematic searches of the PubMed and Medline databases were performed. A total of 35 studies including 22,090 cases and 28,498 controls were identified. Genotype distributions of CYP17 in the controls of all studies were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) except for three studies. When all 35 studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence for significant association between CYP17 MspA1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk (for A1/A2 vs. A1/A1: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.96–1.04; for A2/A2 vs. A1/A1: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.97–1.08; for dominant model: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.97–1.05; for recessive model: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.98–1.08). In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, menopausal status and source of controls, no significant associations were found in all genetic models. When sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding HWE-violating studies, all the results were not materially altered. In summary, the meta-analysis strongly suggests that CYP17 MspA1 polymorphism is not associated with increased breast cancer risk.     

HER2 Ile655Val polymorphism contributes to breast cancer risk: evidence from 27 case–control studies

Proto-oncogene HER2 (also known as erbB-2 or neu) plays an important role in the carcinogenesis and the prognosis of breast cancer. Many epidemiological studies have been conducted to explore the association between the HER2 Ile655Val polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, inconsistency existed in the results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of 27 published case–control studies including 11,504 cases and 12,538 controls. We assessed the strength of the association by crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and reached a result that HER2 Ile655Val polymorphism was associated with an increased breast cancer risk in overall populations (for Ile/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.12, P = 0.07 for heterogeneity; for the dominant model Ile/Val + Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01–1.20, P = 0.01 for heterogeneity). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, we found a significant association among Africans (for Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 8.78, 95% CI = 1.94–39.72, P = 0.35 for heterogeneity; for the recessive model Val/Val vs. Ile/Val +Ile/Ile: OR = 8.60, 95% CI = 1.92–38.48, P = 0.31 for heterogeneity) and Asians (for Ile/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.01–1.39, P = 0.41 for heterogeneity; for the dominant model Val/Val + Ile/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.01–1.38, P = 0.27 for heterogeneity). In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that HER2 Ile 655Val polymorphism may contribute to breast cancer risk.     

TGFB1 L10P polymorphism is associated with breast cancer susceptibility: evidence from a meta-analysis involving 47,817 subjects

Published data on the association between TGFB1 L10P polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between them. A total of 30 studies including 20,401 cases and 27,416 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated breast cancer risk was associated with TGFB1 10P allele when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (LP vs. LL: OR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.003–1.090; dominant model: OR = 1.052, 95% CI = 1.012–1.095). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in Caucasians (dominant model: OR = 1.045, 95% CI = 1.001–1.091). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found based on population-based studies (dominant model: OR = 1.076, 95% CI = 1.019–1.136). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the TGFB1 10P allele may be a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well-matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.     

The hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

It was reported that the functional polymorphism Ser326Cys in the human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase gene was associated with breast cancer risk; however, the published studies have inconsistent conclusions. To elucidate the effect of hOGG1 Ser326Cys on the susceptibility to breast cancer, all available studies were collected in this meta-analysis. We extracted the data from 10 case–control studies that were published in the PubMed database from 2003 to 2008 using the search phrases “human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, hOGG1, OGG1, OGG, polymorphism, genetic variation, and breast cancer.” This meta-analysis included 4,963 breast cancer cases and 4,776 control subjects. The results showed that individuals who carrying the hOGG1 326Cys allele in the additive model did not have significantly increased risk of breast cancer compared with those carrying the 326Ser allele (P = 0.47, OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.96–1.09); similarly, no significant association between the hOGG1 326Cys allele and breast cancer risk was found either in the recessive genetic model (P = 0.34, OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.94–1.18) for Cys/Cys versus Ser/Cys + Ser/Ser, or dominant genetic model (P = 0.78, OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.93–1.11) for Cys/Cys + Ser/Cys versus Ser/Ser. In the stratified analysis, the meta-analysis showed the association between hOGG1 326Cys allele in the additive model and breast cancer was significant in European subjects (P = 0.04, OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.51–0.98), and dominant genetic model (P = 0.004, OR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.25–0.77). However, the association was not significant between this polymorphism and different menopausal status (premenopausal and postmenopausal) and the other ethnicities (Asians and Americans). The meta-analysis suggested that the hOGG1 326Cys allele plays a significant protective effect to breast cancer in European women.     

Lack of an association between AURKA T91A polymorphisms and breast cancer: a meta-analysis involving 32,141 subjects

Several studies have investigated the associations between AURKA T91A polymorphism and the susceptibility to breast cancer, but the results have been inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 11 case–control studies, including 14,361 cases and 17,780 controls, were selected. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association in the additive model, dominant model, and recessive model. When all the studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence showing a significant association between AURKA T91A polymorphism and breast cancer risk (for additive model, OR = 0.839, 95% CI = 0.678–1.038; for dominant model: OR = 0.890, 95% CI = 0.757–1.074; and for recessive model: OR = 0.987, 95% CI = 0.963–1.012). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly decreased risks were found for Asians (additive model, OR = 0.857, 95% CI = 0.742–0.991). When stratified by study design, no significant association was found between the polymorphism and breast cancer risk. In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that the AURKA T91A polymorphism is not a risk factor for developing breast cancer.     

The association between two polymorphisms of eNOS and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) plays a key role in breast cancer development. The associations between the two eNOS polymorphisms (E298D rs1799983, −786T>C rs2070744) and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. A meta-analysis was performed in this study. By searching Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, CNKI, and SinoMed database, six case–control studies were collected for the eNOS E298D polymorphism (3,038 cases and 2,508 controls) and three case–control studies were eligible for the eNOS −786T>C polymorphism. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the two eNOS polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for codominant model, dominant model, and recessive model, respectively. Overall, significantly decreased risk was observed for E298D (for EE vs. DD: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59–0.94; for ED vs. DD: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.61–0.98; for dominant model: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96) and −786T > C (for TT vs. CC: OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.42–0.86; for dominant model: OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47–0.94). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant decreased risks were found for E298D (for EE vs. DD: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.56–0.99) and −786T>C (for TT vs. CC: OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.35–0.81; for dominant model: OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.41–0.91; for recessive model: OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55–0.91) among Caucasians; significant decreased risks were observed for E298D (for ED vs. DD: OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.02–0.96; for dominant model: OR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.02–1.00) among Asians. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that both eNOS E298D and −786T>C polymorphisms are associated with reduced breast cancer risk.     

RAD51 G135C polymorphism is associated with breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 22,399 subjects

Several studies have investigated the associations between RAD51 G135C polymorphism and the susceptibility to breast cancer, but results have been inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 17 case control studies, including 12,153 cases and 10,245 controls, were selected. Overall, significant decreased risk was found for the additive model (OR = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.991–0.998) and dominant model (OR = 0.994, 95% CI = 0.991–0.998). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, statistically significantly decreased risk was found in Asians (additive model: OR = 0.977, 95% CI = 0.954–1.000 and dominant model: OR = 0.981, 95% CI = 0.963–1.000). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the RAD51 G135C polymorphism is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer.     

TNFα ?308 G/A polymorphism is associated with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 10,184 cases and 12,911 controls

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) is a pleiotropic cytokine which can regulate a wide variety of cellular responses. Low concentrations of TNFα seem to increase tumor growth and progression. The −308 G/A polymorphism in TNFα has been implicated in breast cancer risk but the published data remain inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, CNKI, and Chinese Biomedicine Database. 11 studies including 10,184 cases and 12,911 controls were collected for TNFα −308 G/A polymorphism. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the TNFα −308 G/A polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for codominant model (GG versus AA; GA versus AA), dominant model (GG + GA versus AA), recessive model (GG versus GA + AA), and G allele versus A allele, respectively. Overall, significantly elevated breast cancer risk was found for recessive model (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04–1.17) and for G allele versus A allele (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.02–1.14). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were also found among Caucasians for recessive model and for G allele versus A allele (for recessive model: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04–1.17; for G allele versus A allele: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03–1.14). However, no significant associations were found among Asians for all genetic models. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the TNFα −308 G allele is a risk factor for developing breast cancer, especially for Caucasians.     

Lack of association between HER2 codon 655 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: meta-analysis of 22 studies involving 19,341 subjects

Epidemiological studies have investigated the association between HER2 codon 655 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility. However, the results are still inconclusive. To obtain a more precise estimation of the relationship, this meta-analysis was performed. A total of 22 studies including 9,209 cases and 10,132 controls were collected. The strength of association between HER2 codon 655 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility was assessed by calculating crude ORs with 95% CIs. When all the 22 studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence for significant association between HER2 codon 655 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility (for Val/Ile vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.069, 95% CI = 0.976–1.172; for Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.191, 95% CI = 0.922–1.538; for dominant model: OR = 1.093, 95% CI = 0.991–1.206; for recessive model: OR = 1.141, 95% CI = 0.902–1.444). In the subgroup analysis by the source of controls and ethnicity, no significant increased risk was found in all genetic models. However, the current results indicated the modest association between the HER2 Ile655Val polymorphism and Asian population (Val/Ile vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.207, CI = 1.006–1.450). In summary, the meta-analysis suggests that HER2 codon 655 polymorphism is not associated with the increased breast cancer risk.     

Lack of association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and breast cancer risk: evidence from 11 case–control studies

The functional Ser326Cys polymorphism in the human 8-oxogunaine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) gene has been implicated in breast cancer risk. However, the published findings are inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to investigate this relationship. Eleven published case–control studies, including 6,804 breast cancer cases and 6,725 controls were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Overall, no significant associations between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and breast cancer risk were found for Cys/Cys versus Ser/Ser (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94–1.20), Ser/Cys versus Ser/Ser (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.91–1.07), Cys/Cys + Ser/Cys versus Ser/Ser (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93–1.08), and Cys/Cys versus Ser/Cys + Ser/Ser (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97–1.18). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, source of controls, and menopausal status, significant associations were still not observed in all genetic models. Taken together, the results suggest that the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer risk.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">MDM2</Emphasis> 309 T/G polymorphism is associated with colorectal cancer risk especially in Asians: a meta-analysis

The murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene encodes an important regulator which mainly functions as an E3 ligase. The role of the MDM2 protein in the P53 pathway has been especially well-studied. In this study, our aim was to explore the relationship between MDM2 gene 309 T/G polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk. Performing both the overall meta-analysis and the subgroup meta-analysis based on ethnicity and source of controls with a total of 7 eligible studies (2,543 cases and 2,115 controls in all), we detected a significant colorectal cancer risk variation for TG versus GG (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.62–0.86) in the overall analysis and another significant colorectal cancer risk variation for TG versus GG (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59–0.83) in the population-based controls’ subgroup as well. Moreover, in the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity, significant associations were observed for all genetic models in Asians (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41–0.64 for TT versus GG; OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.53–0.78 for TG versus GG; OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.49–0.71 for dominant model; OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.57–0.82 for recessive model), while in Caucasians there was no obvious association. In summary, according to the results of our meta-analysis, the MDM2 309 G allele probably acts as a colorectal cancer risk factor, especially in Asians.