The percentage of free prostate-specific antigen does not predict extracapsular disease in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the percentage of free/total prostate-specific antigen (f/tPSA) can predict the pathological features in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse data from 171 untreated patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Variables included the total PSA (tPSA), fPSA, f/tPSA, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage and patient age. RESULTS: In 115 patients with pathologically organ-confined tumours ( pT2N0) the mean (SD) tPSA value was 6.9 (5.6) ng/mL; in 56 patients with extracapsular disease ( pT3pN0/N+) it was 10.2 (7.6) ng/mL; the respective f/tPSA values were 14.9 (8.1)% and 14.2 (12.9)%. In the univariate and multivariate analysis, tPSA and biopsy Gleason score were highly significant in predicting extracapsular disease (P < 0.001 and 0.002) but the f/tPSA was not (P = 0.18). There was no significant difference between the mean f/tPSA and final Gleason scores. CONCLUSION: The f/tPSA does not predict extracapsular disease in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. Knowing the f/tPSA provides no significant additional information in predicting extracapsular disease when the biopsy Gleason score and tPSA are known.     

Value of the serum prostate-specific antigen-alpha 1-antichymotrypsin complex and its density as a predictor for the extent of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether serum levels of the prostate-specific antigen-alpha1-antichymotrypsin complex (PSA-ACT) and its density (ACTD) in patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer can predict organ-confined vs extraprostatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 62 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer before they underwent radical prostatectomy. PSA and PSA-ACT were measured using immunofluorometric techniques with different monoclonal antibodies against PSA and ACT, respectively. Furthermore, the PSA and PSA-ACT densities of the whole prostate (PSAD and ACTD, respectively) were calculated. The relationships of serum PSA, PSA-ACT, PSAD, ACTD and the pathological stage of the prostatectomy specimens were analysed. RESULTS: The disease was organ-confined or extraprostatic in 30 and 32 men, respectively. In men with organ-confined cancer, the mean PSA and PSA-ACT levels were significantly lower than in those with extraprostatic disease. Furthermore, there were significantly higher mean PSAD and ACTD levels in men with extraprostatic than with organ-confined disease. There were also significant differences in PSA, PSA-ACT, PSAD and ACTD levels at each pathological stage, whereas there was no significant association between these variables and the Gleason score. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for detecting organ-confined disease showed that PSA-ACT and ACTD had a larger area under the curve than PSA and PSAD, respectively, but these differences were not significant. Furthermore, PSA-ACT and ACTD provided significantly better sensitivity for detecting organ-confined disease than PSA and PSAD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring PSA-ACT and ACTD may improve the preoperative evaluation of patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy, because these factors better differentiate extraprostatic from organ-confined disease than PSA and PSAD.     

Predicting the extent of prostate cancer using a combination of serum prostate-specific antigen-alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin complex and systematic biopsy

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of the combined systematic biopsy with serum prostate-specific antigen-alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin complex (PSA-ACT) level to predict the extent of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with clinically organ-confined disease who underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated for serum PSA and PSA-ACT levels, systematic biopsy, and the pathological stage. RESULTS: The incidence of extraprostatic disease in patients with more than half the biopsy cores positive or > or = 8 ng/ml PSA-ACT was significantly higher than those with less than half positive or <8 ng/ml PSA-ACT, respectively, whereas cancer in bilateral lobes or > or = 10 ng/ml PSA could not be used as a predictor of extraprostatic disease. Furthermore, in those with more than half the biopsy cores positive and > or = 8 ng/ml PSA-ACT or those with more than half the biopsy cores positive and > or = 10 ng/ml PSA, extraprostatic disease was significantly more common than in those with less than half positive and <8 ng/ml PSA-ACT or those with less than half positive and <10 ng/ml PSA, respectively. However, the incidence of extraprostatic disease predicted by these three variables was not significantly better than those by the two variables (percentage positive biopsy cores plus serum PSA-ACT or PSA). CONCLUSIONS: The combined systematic biopsy with serum PSA-ACT or PSA could be used as a useful predictor for the extent of prostate cancer. Patients with more than half the biopsy cores positive and > or = 8 ng/ml PSA-ACT or > or = 10 ng/ml PSA could avoid a prostatectomy because there is a high probability that they have extraprostatic disease.     

Predicting the extent of prostate cancer using the combination of systematic biopsy and serum prostate-specific antigen in Japanese men

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of systematic biopsy alone or combined with an assay of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to predict the extent of prostate cancer in Japanese men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients who were diagnosed as having clinically organ-confined prostate cancer and who underwent prostatectomy were evaluated retrospectively for the results of systematic biopsy (percentage of positive biopsy cores and cancer location), serum PSA and the pathological stage of whole-mount sections of the prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: The incidence of extraprostatic disease (pT3N0M0 or N+) in patients with >/= 8 ng/mL of serum PSA and cancer in bilateral lobes was significantly higher than in those with <8 ng/mL PSA and cancer in one lobe (83% vs 30%, P=0.020). In those with more than half the biopsy cores positive, extraprostatic disease was significantly more common than in those with less than half positive (93% vs 44%, P=0.0075); moreover, in patients with more than half the cores positive and >/= 8 ng/mL serum PSA, it was significantly more common than in those with less than half positive and <8 ng/mL of serum PSA (93% vs 27%, P=0.0021). However, the incidence of extraprostatic disease predicted by three variables (cancer location, percentage positive biopsy cores and serum PSA) was not significantly better than that predicted by two variables (percentage positive cores and serum PSA). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of systematic biopsy and serum PSA may be useful in predicting extraprostatic cancer. Patients with >/= 8 ng/mL serum PSA and more than half the biopsy cores positive could avoid a prostatectomy because there is a high probability that they have extraprostatic disease.     

Prediction of the extent of prostate cancer by the combined use of systematic biopsy and serum level of cathepsin D

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of combined systematic prostate biopsy with the serum level of cathepsin D, which has recently been shown to be a useful marker for prostate cancer, to predict the disease extension. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with clinically organ-confined disease who underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated for serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and cathepsin D levels, systematic biopsy, and pathological stage. RESULTS: The incidence of extraprostatic disease in patients with more than half the biopsy cores positive or > or = 15 ng/mL cathepsin D was significantly higher than that in patients with less than half the biopsy cores positive or < 15 ng/mL cathepsin D, respectively; whereas cancer in bilateral lobes or > or = 10 ng/mL PSA could not be used as a predictor of extraprostatic disease. Furthermore, in patients with more than half the biopsy cores positive and > or = 15 ng/mL cathepsin D or those with more than half the biopsy cores positive and > or = 10 ng/mL PSA, extraprostatic disease was significantly more common than in those with less than half the biopsy cores positive and < 15 ng/mL cathepsin D or those with less than half the biopsy cores positive and < 10 ng/mL PSA, respectively. Furthermore, the prediction of the incidence of extraprostatic disease using these three variables was significantly more accurate than using two of the variables (percentage positive biopsy cores plus serum cathepsin D or PSA). CONCLUSION: Systematic biopsy together with serum cathepsin D and/or PSA was a useful predictor of the extent of prostate cancer. Patients with more than half the biopsy cores positive, > or = 15 ng/mL cathepsin D and/or > or = 10 ng/mL PSA could avoid prostatectomy because there is a significantly high probability that they already have extraprostatic disease.     

The free-to-total serum prostatic specific antigen ratio as a predictor of the pathological features of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the role of the ratio of serum free (f) to total (t) prostatic specific antigen (f/tPSA) as a predictor of the pathological features in patients with clinical stage T1c disease submitted for radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Total and fPSA were determined before surgery in 76 consecutive patients with clinical stage T1cN0M0 disease and a serum tPSA level of 4-20 ng/mL. The pathological stage was defined as organ-confined in 47 (62%), with capsular penetration in 27 (35%) and seminal vesicle infiltration in two (3%). In 18 of the specimens (24%) the surgical margins were positive. The pathology was favourable in 41 patients (55%). Total and fPSA were determined using the Tandem and Tandem-free PSA immunoassays (Hybritech Inc, Belgium) RESULTS: The mean tPSA was: 8.7 ng/mL when the tumour was organ-confined and 8.6 ng/mL when the disease was extraprostatic (P>0.05); 8.4 ng/mL when the tumour was specimen-confined and 9.3 ng/mL when positive margins or seminal vesicle involvement were detected (P>0.05); and 8.3 ng/mL when the pathology was favourable and 9.0 ng/mL when unfavourable (P>0.05). The f/tPSA was 11.8% when the tumour was organ-confined and 9.1% when it was not (P<0.03), 11.9% when the tumour was specimen-confined and 7.6% when not (P<0.002) and 12.1% when the pathology was favourable and 9.1% when unfavourable (P<0.008). A threshold of 11% f/tPSA provided an odds ratio for organ-confined disease of 2.7, for specimen-confined disease of 7.6 and for a favourable pathology of 3.9. CONCLUSION: The f/tPSA seems to provide useful information in the prediction of the pathological features of patients with clinical T1c prostate cancer and a tPSA of 4.1-20 ng/mL.     

The total percentage of biopsy cores with cancer improves the prediction of pathological stage after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the simple variable 'percentage of cancer-positive biopsy cores' is a significant predictor of true pathological stage after radical prostatectomy and can be used to improve pathological stage prediction by simple means. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 375 patients had a radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in two UK centres; 260 had complete preoperative staging information. Logistic regression was used and predicted probability graphs constructed to assess predictors of pathological stage. RESULTS: In this study, only PSA (P = 0.004) and percentage cancer-positive biopsy cores (P < 0.001) were significant predictors of pathological stage. The final model was an acceptable classifier for pathological stage (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.76, specificity 85%, sensitivity 47%). A patient with a PSA of 10 ng/mL and one of six cores positive for cancer would have a predicted probability of extraprostatic disease of 20%, whereas the same patient with all six biopsy cores positive would have a predicted probability of extraprostatic disease of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of cancer-positive biopsy cores significantly predicts the disease stage after radical prostatectomy. This variable is easy to obtain by the clinician and avoids the need to estimate the percentage of biopsy tissue infiltrated by cancer. This readily available information can easily be computed and may help to counsel patients about realistic expectations of organ-confined disease in relation to surgery as a treatment option.     

The role of the complexed-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in predicting the final pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the complexed-to-total (C:T) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio and prostate cancer pathological stage to assess whether the C:T PSA ratio may predict the final pathological stage in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 101 men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent a staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy. Total PSA (tPSA) and PSA complexed to alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin (cPSA) were measured from preoperative plasma and were correlated with the clinical and pathological stage, and with surgical margin status. The pathological stage was determined as organ-confined (n=59) and extracapsular extension (n=42). RESULTS: The distributions of tPSA and cPSA were significantly different in men with locally confined and those with locally extended disease. This finding was not observed for the C:T PSA ratio. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to predict the final pathological stage was significantly greater for tPSA (0.684) and cPSA (0.677) than for the C:T PSA ratio (p<0.032). TPSA (0.685) and cPSA (0.670) also showed areas under the ROC curve greater than that of the C:T PSA ratio (0.542) (p<0.05) for prediction of positive surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the C:T PSA ratio does not improve the performance of total PSA for predicting the final pathological stage in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.     

Pretreatment serum testosterone level as a predictive factor of pathological stage in localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: Pretreatment serum level of testosterone (T) is a potential prognostic factor for prostate cancer. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical significance of pretreatment serum T level in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects were 82 clinically localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy, whose pretreatment T levels were recorded. We investigated clinical and pathological factors such as pretreatment serum T level, age, pretreatment PSA or pathological Gleason score concerning the association with pathological stage and biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: The mean pretreatment T level was significantly lower in patients with non-organ-confined prostate cancer (pT3-T4, N1; 3.44+/-1.19 ng/ml) than in patients with organ-confined cancer (pT2; 4.33+/-1.42 ng/ml) (p=0.0078). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pathological Gleason score, pretreatment serum T level and pretreatment PSA were significant predictors of extraprostatic disease. When the patients were divided into high and low T level groups according to the median value, pretreatment T levels were not significantly associated with PSA recurrence rates (p=0.7973). CONCLUSIONS: A lower pretreatment T level appears to be predictive of extraprostatic disease in patients with localized prostate cancer.     

Prediction of extraprostatic extension by prostate specific antigen velocity, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer

Objectives:   To investigate the clinical value of prostate specific antigen velocity (PSAV) in predicting the extraprostatic extension of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Methods:   One hundred and three patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were included in the analysis. The correlation between preoperative parameters, including PSA-based parameters, clinical stage, and histological biopsy findings, and the pathological findings were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify a significant set of independent predictors for the local extent of the disease.
Results:   Sixty-four (60.2%) patients had organ confined prostate cancer and 39 (39.8%) patients had extraprostatic cancer. The biopsy Gleason score, PSA, PSA density, PSA density of the transition zone, and PSAV were significantly higher in the patients with extraprostatic cancer than in those with organ confined cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the biopsy Gleason score, endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings, and PSAV were significant predictors of extraprostatic cancer ( P  < 0.01). Probability curves for extraprostatic cancer were generated using these three preoperative parameters.
Conclusions:   The combination of PSAV, endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings, and biopsy Gleason score can provide additional information for selecting appropriate candidates for radical prostatectomy.     

Prediction of pathological stages before prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: Analysis of 12 systematic prostate needle biopsy specimens

OBJECTIVE: To identify the most reliable predictor of the pathological stage among multiple parameters obtained by performing systematic biopsies and to assess the predictive value of any identified parameters in combination with the prostate specific antigen and the Gleason scores. METHODS: We examined 5 biopsy parameters from 12 systematic needle biopsy results in 104 consecutive prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy: the number of cores positive for cancer, percentage of positive biopsy cores, total linear cancer length (absolute sum of tumor length at each core), percentage cancer length (total cancer length divided by total length of cores obtained x100), and maximum cancer core length. The predictive values of these parameters were assessed using multivariate logistic analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis. We evaluated whether the most reliable biopsy parameter in combination with traditional variables show better predictability of the pathological stage than traditional variables alone by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Of 104 patients, 85 (82.9%) had organ confined cancer and 19 (17.1%) showed extraprostatic extension. Of the five parameters examined, maximum cancer length was found to best predict pathological staging. Although insignificant, adding results of maximum cancer length to prostate specific antigen and Gleason scores improved predictability. Of 41 patients with a maximum cancer length of <0.9 cm, PSA of <16 ng/mL, and Gleason score of <7, none showed extraprostatic extension. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum cancer length was found to be the most reliable predictor of disease staging. The findings of a maximum cancer length of <0.9 cm, PSA of <16 ng/mL, and a Gleason score of <7 can suggest an organ-confined disease.     

Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the percentage of cancer in prostate needle biopsies provides independent prognostic information for predicting pathological stage and/or biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: One hundred and forty prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated. Preoperative parameters analyzed were patient age, PSA, clinical stage, and the information obtained from sextant biopsies (Gleason score, maximum percentage of cancer in a core, percentage of tissue with cancer in all biopsies and the number of cores positive for cancer). Univariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression) for the dependent variables (prostate cancer, organ-confined and biochemical relapse) were performed. RESULTS: The tumor was organ-confined in 73.6% of patients. In those patients studied for disease progression (n = 126), no biochemical recurrence was observed in 76.2%. In the multivariate analysis for organ-confined disease, the total percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, the preoperative PSA level, the Gleason score and the clinical stage were the most accurate predictive factors of pathological stage. The multivariate analysis for the study of biochemical failure indicated that only the total percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, the preoperative PSA level and the Gleason score were independent predictive factors. According to the logistic regression analysis for disease recurrence, 3 risk groups could be identified: low risk (less than 10% probability of disease progression), intermediate risk (30%) and high risk (more than 70%). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of cancer in prostate biopsy provides independent prognostic information for predicting pathological stage and the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.     

Use of various combinations of free, complexed and total prostate-specific antigen levels as predictors of the pathologic stage of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of various combinations of total, free and complexed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were assessed to predict the pathologic stage of prostate cancer. METHODS: Total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA) levels were measured preoperatively in 52 patients with clinical localized prostate cancer who had undergone radical prostatectomy. Pathologic stages were classified as: organ-confined (n = 27); capsular penetration (n = 14); seminal vesicle involvement (n = 8); involvement of the surgical margins (n = 10); and lymph node involvement (n = 3). RESULTS: The fPSA/tPSA and fPSA/cPSA ratios significantly differed between patients with organ-confined disease and non-organ-confined disease (P = 0.035, P = 0.033, respectively) and between those with favorable versus unfavorable pathology (P = 0.001, P = 0.014, respectively), but tPSA, cPSA, fPSA and the cPSA/tPSA ratio did not. Using a fPSA/tPSA cutoff level of 11%, the prediction of organ-confined disease would increase from 52 to 67% and the rate of predicting favorable pathology would increase from 42 to 62%. A fPSA/cPSA cutoff level of 12% would increase the rate of predicting organ-confined disease to 79% and the rate of predicting favorable pathology would increase to 69%. The positive predictive value of the fPSA/cPSA ratio was higher than that of the fPSA/tPSA ratio, although the receiver operating characteristic curve of the fPSA/cPSA ratio was not different from that of the fPSA/tPSA ratio. CONCLUSION: Although there was no predictive difference found between fPSA/tPSA and fPSA/cPSA ratio, both ratios may help predict the pathologic stage of prostate cancer.     

Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density,endorectal MRI,and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUNDS: The present study was designed to identify the preoperative parameters, including PSA-based parameters, and endorectal MRI, predictive of pathological stage in males who underwent radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We studied 114 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Clinical stage was assessed by DRE, pelvic CT scan, endorectal MRI, and bone scan. The correlation between the preoperative parameters, including PSA-based parameters, clinical stage, and histological findings of biopsy specimens, and the pathological stage was analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify a significant set of independent predictors for local extent of disease. RESULTS: Seventy-six (66.6%) patients had organ confined cancer and 38 (33.4%) patients had extraprostatic cancer. Of the 38 patients with extraprostatic cancer, four had seminal vesicle involvement, while, none had pelvic lymph node involvement. Biopsy Gleason score, PSA, PSA-alpha1-antichymotrypsin (PSA-ACT), PSA-density (PSAD), PSA-transition zone density, PSA-ACT density, and PSA-ACT transition zone (TZ) density were significantly higher and percent free PSA was lower in the patients with organ confined cancer than those with extraprostatic cancer (P < 0.01). PSAD showed the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) among those parameters (AUC = 0.732). Sixty-eight (74.7%) of 91 patients with T2 on endorectal MRI had organ confined cancer, while 15 (65.2%) of 23 patients with T3 had extraprostatic cancer (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that Gleason score (> or =7 vs. < or =6), endorectal MRI findings, and PSAD were significant predictors of extraprostatic cancer (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that preoperative PSAD was the most valuable predictor among PSA-based parameters for extraprostatic disease in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. The combination of PSAD, endorectal MRI findings, and biopsy Gleason score can provide additional information for selecting appropriate candidates for radical prostatectomy.     

The Role of TRUS Prostate Biopsy Quantitative Histology in Predicting the Risk of Extraprostatic Disease

Objectives: In the era of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), extended core biopsy schemes are widely adopted with an increased detection rate of stage T1c prostate cancer. As regards extraprostatic disease, the low predictive value of traditional prognostic factors, such as Gleason score (Gs) and PSA levels in this group of patients means that prostate biopsy quantitative histology plays a major role in the risk assessment of extraprostatic involvement.Methods: Literature on prostate biopsy was reviewed and a selection of articles made. Keywords used for the Medline search included: prostate cancer, biopsy, staging and prognosis.Results: Over the last few years, an increasing number of investigators have shown that number and percentage of positive cores, percentage of tumor involvement, maximum percentage of tumor involvement on the cores most strongly involved and tumor location, are considered the most predictive pathological parameters for adverse final pathological results. However, they are somewhat limited in terms of predicting the pathological stage of the disease on an individual basis.Conclusions: Nowadays, several quantitative histological parameters have been evidenced as good indicators for an extraprostatic spread of the tumor and positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. However, it is difficult for a single parameter in systematic biopsies to predict pathological stage and final outcome. Only the inclusion of some measure of neoplastic extension on the biopsies in models for the preoperative prediction of pathological stage will tell us what the definitive role of quantitative prostate biopsy is in assessing the risk of extraprostatic extension.     

Nomograms to predict the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men: Comparison with Western predictive tools using decision curve analysis

Objectives: To develop and evaluate nomograms to predict the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in Korean men. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 2041 patients who had clinical stages T1c–T3a prostate cancer and were treated solely with radical prostatectomy at two hospitals. Logistic regressions were carried out to predict organ‐confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node metastasis using preoperative variables and resulting nomograms. Internal validations were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration plot, and then external validations were carried out on 129 patients from another hospital. Head‐to‐head comparisons with 2007 Partin tables and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score were carried out using the area under the curve and decision curve analysis. Results: The significant predictors for organ‐confined disease and extraprostatic extension were clinical stage, prostate‐specific antigen, Gleason score and a percent positive core of biopsy. Significant predictors for seminal vesicle invasion were prostate‐specific antigen, Gleason score and percent positive core, and those for lymph node metastasis were prostate‐specific antigen and percent positive core. The area under the curve of established nomograms for organ‐confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node metastasis were 0.809, 0.804, 0.889 and 0.838, respectively. The nomograms were well calibrated and externally validated. These nomograms showed significantly higher accuracies and net benefits than two Western tools in Korean men. Conclusion: This is the first study to have developed and fully validated nomograms to predict the pathological stage of prostate cancer in an Asian population. These nomograms might be more accurate and useful for Korean men than other predictive models developed using Western populations.     

Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the present study were to characterize, according to tumor significance, the clinicopathological features of patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy, and to determine useful parameters for predicting insignificant disease before surgery. METHODS: In this series, we included 195 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer at our institution between January 1999 and November 2003. Several clinicopathological factors were analyzed, focusing on whether the largest tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens was >/=0.5 cm(3) or <0.5 cm(3), which is the criterion defined to distinguish insignificant cancer from significant cancer. RESULTS: Potentially insignificant cancer was detected in 28 of 195 patients (14.4%). There were significant differences between patients with insignificant disease and those with significant disease in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) as well as all biopsy parameters, with the exception of biopsy Gleason score. Furthermore, final pathological examination demonstrated that these two patient groups showed significant differences in Gleason score and the incidence of extraprostatic disease extension. Pearson's correlation analysis showed that tumor volume in the prostatectomy specimens was significantly associated with serum PSA and all biopsy parameters; however, each of the correlations was comparatively weak. There was no single parameter that could viewed as a useful predictor of tumor significance. The best model for predicting insignificant tumor was the combined use of biopsy Gleason score <7 and percent of positive biopsy core (PPBC) <15%; however, the further addition of serum PSA <10 ng/mL to these two parameters failed to enhance the predictive value of cancer significance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that clinicopathological findings suggesting favorable features are well observed in patients with potentially insignificant prostate cancer compared to those with significant prostate cancer, and the combination of a biopsy Gleason score <7 and PPBC <15% might be useful as a predictor of insignificant disease.     

Pathological findings of radical prostatectomy specimens in Japanese men diagnosed on single core positive prostate biopsy in eight with a Gleason score less than 4

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to analyze the pathological findings of radical prostatectomy specimens diagnosed on single core positive prostate biopsy in eight systematic transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsies with a Gleason score 相似文献