Severe complications after hypofractionated high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy following external beam irradiation for oesophageal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate severe complications that developed after high dose rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for oesophageal carcinoma. Six consecutive patients with oesophageal carcinoma were treated by external beam irradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) followed by hypofractionated intracavitary HDR brachytherapy (10 Gy in 2 fractions). Two of the six patients were alive and well for more than 2-3 years following therapy, but three of the six patients developed treatment-related oesophageal fistulae and died. HDR intracavitary brachytherapy following external beam irradiation is an effective method for radical treatment of oesophageal carcinoma. However, hypofractionated HDR brachytherapy should be used with care.     

Low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) experience

PURPOSE: To review the clinical outcome retrospectively of cervical cancer patients treated definitively with either high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred sixty patients (44 Stage I, 83 Stage II, and 33 Stage III) were treated from 1990 to 2000 with curative intent for carcinoma of the cervix. One hundred three LDR patients were compared to 57 HDR patients. Two groups were treated during the same period. An external beam dose of 45 Gy to the entire pelvis was delivered at 1.8 Gy per fraction to most patients before the first intracavitary insertion in both groups. Brachytherapy was delivered in one to two LDR implants or four to five HDR implants at 6 Gy per fraction. The prescribed dose to Point A for LDR was at least 80-85 Gy. Patient characteristics were similar for each cohort. Point A doses were similar for each stage. The primary endpoints assessed were survivals and failure sites. Endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons between treatment groups were performed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The median followup was 48 months for the LDR group and 59 months for the HDR group. For all stages combined and stage for stage in both groups, there was no statistically significant difference in locoregional control, cause-specific survival, and overall survival for LDR compared with HDR. Locoregional control and overall survival were 78% and 60% for LDR compared to 76% and 55% for HDR at 3 years, respectively (p = 0.96 and p = 0.48). Median cause-specific survival values for LDR vs. HDR were 71 and 81 months, respectively (p = 0.62). The cause-specific survival for LDR patients was 62% compared with 59% for HDR patients at 3 years. For Stage IB2, II, and III LDR patients, cause-specific survival rates were 62%, 67%, and 45%, compared to 67%, 57%, and 33% for HDR at 3 years, respectively (p = 0.75, p = 0.95, and p = 0.48). For patients with a recorded site of first failure, the most common site was locoregional (56%) and then distant metastases (26%). Eight patients who were cancer free developed late complications requiring surgical intervention. Two patients were in the HDR group (3.5%) and 5 in the LDR group (4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Similar outcome was observed for LDR compared with HDR intracavitary brachytherapy for the entire cohort. In this review, HDR group was not inferior to LDR group in advanced stages. This is likely because our patients were treated with brachytherapy after a high dose of external pelvic radiotherapy in both LDR and HDR patients.     

The multimodality therapy of advanced inoperable esophageal carcinoma. A retrospective analysis]

BACKGROUND: The records of 161 patients with inoperable esophageal carcinoma were reviewed to determine the influence of concurrent radiochemotherapy and brachytherapy on overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1984 to 1999 161 patients suffering from advanced esophageal carcinoma Stage II to IV were treated with radiotherapy alone (131) or radiochemotherapy (30). In 48 patients additional brachytherapy was given. Median follow-up was 8 months (1 to 64 months), the median external beam doses was 51 Gy (18 to 66.6 Gy) and the median brachytherapy dose was 10 Gy (4 to 25 Gy). Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. RESULTS: Median survival for all patients was 10 months, 3-year survival rate 13% and the 5-year survival 5.2%. In univariate analysis the best results were achieved by concurrent radiochemotherapy with a median overall survival of 13 months, a 4-year survival of 18% (p = 0.0368), the combination of external radiotherapy and additional brachytherapy with a median overall survival of 14 months, a 4-year survival of 12.2% (p = 0.0008). After combination of concurrent radiochemotherapy and brachytherapy the 2-year survival rate is 58%. Multivariate analysis revealed simultaneous radiochemotherapy, external beam dose and additional brachytherapy as prognostic factors. Combination of concurrent radiochemotherapy and brachytherapy was possible without significant increase of local toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis demonstrates that concurrent radiochemotherapy and additional brachytherapy are effective treatment schedules without significant increase of toxicity and may improve overall survival of patients with inoperable carcinoma of the esophagus. According to the results of this retrospective study, it would be appropriate to conduct a randomized trial to evaluate the benefit of combination of concurrent radiochemotherapy and brachytherapy.     

Transperineal Low-Dose Rate Iridium-192 Interstitial Brachytherapy in Cervical Carcinoma Stage IIB

PURPOSE: To assess local control, survival and complications in patients with cervical carcinoma Stage IIB treated radically with transperineal Iridium-192 low-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy following external beam radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 65 women (age 25-70 years, mean 47 years) with cervical carcinoma Stage IIB were initially treated with external beam radiotherapy on a telecobalt or 6 MV linear accelerator to a dose of 50 Gy delivered in 5-6 weeks. After 2-3 weeks of completing external radiation, patients received interstitial brachytherapy with Iridium-192 (activity 0.5-1 mCi/cm) using a Syed-Neblett perineal template. The median dose delivered to the implant volume was 24 Gy (range 20-32 Gy) delivered at an average dose rate of 0.70 Gy/h (range 0.40-1.20 Gy/h). A point defined at 1.5 cm lateral to the central uterine tandem at the level of os was taken as a representative for assessing the dose to the cervix. Mean doses delivered by interstitial brachytherapy to point A, cervix, point B and rectum were 38 Gy, 34 Gy, 16 Gy and 16 Gy, respectively. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 53 months, the actuarial disease free survival and overall survival for 65 patients at both 5 and 10 years was 64% and 44%, respectively. Response to radiotherapy was a strong predictor of local control with 82% of patients continuing to have pelvic control after initial complete response. Overall, nine (14%) patients had persistent disease, ten (15%) developed a central recurrence after initial control and three patients developed distant metastasis on follow-up. No patient had any immediate treatment-related complication. Late toxicity included grade I-II rectal reactions in five patients and grade IV bladder complication (vesico-vaginal fistula) in two patients. 5 years after treatment, one patient developed intestinal obstruction, which was relieved after conservative management. Two patients developed vaginal stenosis. The 5- and 10-year disease free survival was 48% in patients aged less than 45 years as compared to 80% in patients of more than 45 years (p = 0.009). Dose to the cervical point was a prognostic indicator with 5- and 10-year disease free survival of 47% in patients who received < 35 Gy in comparison to 80% in patients who had > 35 Gy (p = 0.03). There was no difference in local control and survival in patients with minimal and moderate parametrial involvement. Bulky disease (> 4 cm) at presentation and a longer gap between external radiation and brachytherapy showed a trend towards inferior local control. CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial brachytherapy after external beam irradiation in patients with cervical carcinoma Stage IIB results in acceptable local control, survival and complication rates. Increased dose to the cervical disease results in improved local control and survival and should therefore be considered while optimizing brachytherapy treatment plans. Comparison of the results with those of standard intracavitary therapy remains to be proven in a randomized trial.     

Combined modality treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective review of our experience using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: During the study period, we recommended external beam radiotherapy (45 Gy) and HDR boost (18 Gy in three fractions) combined with hormonal therapy (HT) for 2 months before and during radiotherapy to patients with at least one of the following risk features: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen>10, Gleason score (GS)>or=7, and clinical T3 disease. Additional HT for 2 years after radiotherapy was recommended for patients with GS>7. To patients whose risk of positive nodes exceeded 15%, we recommended whole pelvic radiotherapy. We administered HDR via single implant, and all fractions were given within 24h. RESULTS: This report is based on our initial 64 patients treated with HDR boost. The median follow-up was 50 months (range 25-68 months). The 4-year estimates of overall and disease-free survival were 98% and 92%, respectively. One patient experienced late grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: HDR brachytherapy is an effective means of delivering conformal prostate radiotherapy, and may be used with whole pelvic radiotherapy and HT.     

Prospective study of HDR (192Ir) versus MDR (137Cs) intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the results of high-dose rate (HDR) and medium-dose rate (MDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix on the basis of a prospective study and to determine the dose rate conversion factor (DRCF) from low-dose rate (LDR) to MDR via HDR, because a DRCF of 0.54 from LDR to HDR has been widely accepted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1991 and July 1999, 104 patients were entered into this trial to compare results between HDR (n=54) and MDR (n=50). Three patients were excluded from this study, leaving 54 HDR patients and 47 MDR patients eligible. Method and dose of external beam radiotherapy were the same for both groups. For HDR intracavitary brachytherapy, point A dose was adjusted to 32 Gy/4 fractions for stages I and II, to 30 Gy/4 fractions for stage III, and to 22.5 Gy/3 fractions for stage IV. The corresponding values for MDR were 35.6 Gy/4 fractions, 34 Gy/4 fractions, and 25.5 Gy/3 fractions. The average dose rate at point A was 30 Gy/hour (9.0-65.2) for HDR and 1.7 Gy/hour (1.3-2.2) for MDR. We assumed a DRCF of 0.9 from MDR to HDR. RESULTS: The 3-year cause-specific survival rates for HDR were 85%, 83%, 75%, and 0% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The corresponding figures for MDR were 100%, 82%, 58%, and 40%. Six of the HDR patients (11%) and 2 of the MDR patients (4%) developed Kottmeier's grade 2 or 3 late complications. A DRCF of 0.6 from LDR to MDR could be derived from a DRCF of 0.9 from MDR to HDR and one of 0.54 from LDR to HDR. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in cause-specific survival and incidence of late complications between HDR and MDR. A DRCF of 0.6 from LDR to MDR could be determined. However, because the results of this trial were preliminary, a further study is needed.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for previously irradiated patients with recurrent esophageal cancer

Purpose Our objective was to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and complications of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for patients with recurrent esophageal cancer after external radiotherapy. Materials and methods Six patients with recurrent esophageal cancer after external radiotherapy were treated with HDR brachytherapy (Ir-192 source) from January 2003 to February 2004. The median age of the patients was 69 years. All patients had received external radiotherapy (median dose 60 Gy) before HDR brachytherapy. All patients underwent HDR brachytherapy once a week with a dose of 4 or 5 Gy per fraction in the esophageal mucosa (median total dose 20 Gy). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control rates. Results The median overall survival period was 30.0 months. Local control was observed in five patients and residual tumor in one patient. Persistent local control was observed in two patients. No patient died of esophageal cancer, and all patients survived. We observed no severe late complications related to HDR brachytherapy. Conclusion These data suggest that HDR brachytherapy is an effective and safe treatment for patients with recurrent esophageal cancer after external radiotherapy.     

Intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix--comparison of HDR (Ir-192) and MDR (Cs-137)

Purpose To compare the results of high dose rate (HDR) (Ir-192) and medium dose rate (MDR) (Cs-137) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Materials and Methods Between May 1991 and March 2001, a total of 206 patients with Stage I-IVA previously untreated cervical cancer were treated with ICRT combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). HDR was administered to a total of 135 patients: 22 patients in Stage I, 49 in Stage II, 56 in Stage III, and eight in Stage IVA. MDR was administered to a total of 71 patients: six patients in Stage I, 27 in Stage II, 33 in Stage III, and five in Stage IVA. The MDR at point A was 30 Gy/hour for HDR and 1.7 Gy/hour for MDR treatment, and the corresponding median follow-up periods for survivors were 55 and 68 months. Results For the HDR group, 5-year cause-specific survival rates were 90%, 78%, 53% and 33% for Stages I, II, III, and IVA, respectively. For the MDR group, the corresponding rates were 100%, 76%, 51%, and 40%. In the HDR group, 19 patients (14%) developed Grade 2 or higher late complications, and, in the MDR group, four patients (6%) did. Conclusions There was no statistically significant difference in cause-specific survivals between the results of HDR and MDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer. The incidence of late complications tended to be higher for the HDR group than for the MDR group, but did not show a statistically significant difference (p=0.07).     

Managing nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intracavitary brachytherapy: one institution's 45-year experience

PURPOSE: At our institution, we have been using intracavitary brachytherapy as a boost in selected cases of both primary and recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The local control, distant metastasis-free rate, overall survival, and morbidity are presented. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1, 1955, and August 2000, 576 patients with a diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were seen at the department of radiation oncology, University of California-San Francisco, and 55 patients received intracavitary brachytherapy as one part of their treatment. All patients were treated with megavoltage external beam radiation, including 43 patients treated for initial disease and 12 for recurrence. Brachytherapy was routinely used for early cases of T1 and T2 lesions and selected cases of more advanced lesions, as well as recurrent lesions. The median age was 48 years (range 22-85 years); there were 17 women and 38 men, and 39 patients were ethnic Chinese, 13 were white, and 3 were other races. Stage at treatment (primary and recurrent) was I (n=13), II (n=18), III (n=19), and IV (n=5); 18 patients had concurrent chemotherapy. The brachytherapy applicators used were Rotterdam (n=24), balloon (n=16), ovoid (n=14), and ribbon (n=1). The dose rate was high (n=24), low (n=29), or pulsed (n=2). External beam doses ranged from 54 to 72 Gy for primary disease and 30 to 42 Gy for recurrent disease. Brachytherapy doses ranged from 5 to 7 Gy for high dose rate and 10 to 54 Gy for low dose rate. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 36 months in those who were treated for primary carcinoma, the 5-year estimate of local control was 89%, the distant metastasis-free rate was 75%, and the overall survival estimate was 86%. Recurrent patients had a median follow-up of 50 months; the 5-year estimate of local control was 64%, the distant metastasis-free rate was 100%, and the overall survival estimate was 91%. Patients with Stage I or II disease had a longer overall survival compared with those with Stage III or IV (p=0.05). There was a significant difference in the rate of distant metastases due to nodal status (N0 vs. N1-N3, p=0.02) or to overall stage (I/II vs. III/IV, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Intracavitary boost brachytherapy was found to be effective and well tolerated in selected cases of both primary and recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.     

Favorable clinical outcomes of three-dimensional computer-optimized high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy in the management of localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To report PSA relapse-free survival and toxicity outcomes of prostate cancer patients who have undergone three-dimensional computer-optimized high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy as definitive treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred five patients consecutively treated between 1998 and 2004 are reported. All patients were treated with HDR boost with lr 192 (5.5-7.0 Gy), based upon postimplant CT three-dimensional treatment planning using an in-house treatment plan optimization algorithm. Three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (45-50.4 Gy) was also administered 3 weeks after the HDR procedure. Toxicity was measured using National Cancer Institutes Common Toxicity Criteria and International Prostate Symptom Score indices. RESULTS: With a median followup of 44 months (8-79 months), the 5-year PSA relapse-free survival outcomes for low, intermediate and high-risk patients were 100%, 98%, and 92%, respectively, Median urinary toxicity, and 93% of patients denied rectal problems at the time of last followup. Erectile dysfunction was noted in 47% patients at the time of last followup, but overall 80% were able to achieve vaginal penetration when those who responded to sildenafil were included. CONCLUSION: Computer-optimized three-dimensional HDR prostate brachytherapy provides excellent disease control for even high risk localized prostate cancer. Significant toxicity has been minimal.     

Early results of exclusive radiotherapy in advanced stage cervical carcinoma performed with reference to ICRU Report 38.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most of the studies in which medium dose rate (MDR) or high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy have been used for the treatment of cervical carcinoma were prescribed according to the Manchester system. This study aims to present early results of exclusive radiotherapy, which includes MDR brachytherapy, performed using ICRU 38 recommendations to their full extent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 1997, 80 patients with advanced stage (FIGO stages IIA-IVA) cervical carcinoma received external beam therapy (EBT) to the pelvis at a total dose of 46 to 50 Gy and two fractions of MDR (approximately 11.5 Gy/h) brachytherapy delivered to the 60 Gy reference isodose. A dose correction factor of 0.80 was used for dose rate effect. Additionally, 10-14 Gy EBT was given as a parametrial boost. Mean follow-up duration was 25.7 months. RESULTS: Local control (LC) and 3-year overall survival were 63% and 68%, respectively, for all patients. For stages II, III, and IV, LC was 75%, 44%, and 60% and 3-year survival was 75%, 62%, and 50%, respectively. Seven patients had severe late complications (8.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study encourage the use of ICRU 38 recommendations with MDR or HDR brachytherapy with some additional measures in terms of the radiobiological aspect.     

Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Base of Tongue Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:. To date none of the studies examined the feasibility and efficacy of interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the tongue base. Therefore the aim of this study was to contribute to this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS:. Between 1992 and 2000 37 patients (mean age 55 years) with T1-4 and N0-3 carcinoma of the base of tongue were presented. Neck dissection was carried out in twelve cases (32%). 30 patients with advanced stage received brachytherapy boost after 50-66.5 Gy (mean, 60 Gy) locoregional external beam irradiation (EBI) and 7 patients with early stage (T1-2, N0) were managed locally with wide tumor excision and sole brachytherapy. 4 of them underwent neck dissection and the others were subjected to 50 Gy regional EBI. The mean dose of boost and sole brachytherapy was 18 Gy and 28 Gy, respectively. RESULTS:. The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 51 months. The 7 sole brachytherapy patients are living with no evidence of disease. For patients treated with EBI and brachytherapy boost, the 5-year actuarial rate of local, locoregional recurrence-free and overall survival was 60%, 52% and 46%, respectively. For all patients in univariate analysis larger tumor size (T4 vs. T1-3) was significant negative predictor of local (RR: 7.23) and locoregional control (RR: 3.87), but nodal involvement was not. Delayed soft tissue ulceration and osteoradionecrosis occurred in 4 (13%) EBI and brachytherapy treated patients. None of the sole brachytherapy patients experienced severe late radiation toxicity. CONCLUSION:. EBI combined with interstitial HDR brachytherapy boost result in acceptable local tumor control with low incidence of late side effects in patients with advanced disease. Fractionated sole HDR brachytherapy following tumor excision is a feasible treatment option for patients with early stage cancer and gives excellent local results.     

Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer

PurposeTo compare the dose distribution characteristics of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with intracavitary high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma.Methods and MaterialsHDR intracavitary brachytherapy treatment plans for 11 women with cervical carcinoma were evaluated in this analysis. The total HDR brachytherapy dose was 28 Gy given in four fractions. HDR brachytherapy was delivered with the microSelectron HDR therapy unit (Nucletron B. V., Veenendaal, The Netherlands). SBRT plans for each patient were generated with MultiPlan for CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). The dose distributions, dose–volume histograms, and maximum dose points of the target and critical organs were recorded for both plans.ResultsSBRT yielded significantly better target coverage; the median target coverage for the 100% isodose line was 50.7% for HDR brachytherapy plans, whereas it was 99.1% for SBRT plans. The dose distributions for critical organs were similar in both types of plans. The exceptions were the 25% isodose being significantly better in brachytherapy plans for rectum, and the 100% isodose exposure being higher in brachytherapy plans for rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon. Some significant differences were also found in maximum doses received by a 2-cc volume of bladder in favor of SBRT plans. In addition, maximum bone marrow doses were significantly higher in SBRT plans.ConclusionSBRT plans achieved better target coverage and better dose distributions to critical organs except bone marrow compared with HDR brachytherapy plans in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.     

Radiotherapy of local recurrence of rectal carcinoma

In retrospective, non-randomized study were analyzed 45 patients with local recurrences of rectal carcinoma treated by combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and "High dose rate (HDR) remote afterloading" brachytherapy in the period from January 1st, 1988 to May 1st, 1988. Depending on the localization of the local recurrent disease, 20 patients were with vaginal relapse, 13 with vaginal and presacral, 9 with perineal and 3 with presacral and rectal. Combined radiotherapy was applied as follows: 33 patients (73.3%) had EBRT with endovaginal brachytherapy, 3 (6.7%) EBRT plus intraluminal brachytherapy and 9 (20%) patients EBRT plus interstitial brachytherapy. Techniques with 3 and 4 field for EBRT were used and doses ranged 45-65 Gy with convenient fractionation were applied, combined with the doses ranged 15-35 Gy for brachytherapy. Radiotherapy was planned according to the computer tomography cross image on simulator with computer planning. Complete regression of the tumor was observed in 19 patients (42.2%), and partial in 23 patients (51.1%). Median follow-up period was 34 months (8-72). Acute radiation adverse effects were registered in 32 patients, and late sequels in 6 (13.3%). Overall 3-year survival rate was 54% and disease-free survival rate was 34% in the same period.     

Intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix—Comparison of HDR (Ir-192) and MDR (Cs-137)—

Purpose

To compare the results of high dose rate (HDR) (Ir-192) and medium dose rate (MDR) (Cs-137) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Materials and Methods

Between May 1991 and March 2001, a total of 206 patients with Stage I-IVA previously untreated cervical cancer were treated with ICRT combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). HDR was administered to a total of 135 patients: 22 patients in Stage I, 49 in Stage II, 56 in Stage III, and eight in Stage IVA. MDR was administered to a total of 71 patients: six patients in Stage I, 27 in Stage II, 33 in Stage III, and five in Stage IVA. The MDR at point A was 30 Gy/hour for HDR and 1.7 Gy/hour for MDR treatment, and the corresponding median follow-up periods for survivors were 55 and 68 months.

Results

For the HDR group, 5-year cause-specific survival rates were 90%, 78%, 53% and 33% for Stages I, II, III, and IVA, respectively. For the MDR group, the corresponding rates were 100%, 76%, 51%, and 40%. In the HDR group, 19 patients (14%) developed Grade 2 or higher late complications, and, in the MDR group, four patients (6%) did.

Conclusions

There was no statistically significant difference in cause-specific survivals between the results of HDR and MDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer. The incidence of late complications tended to be higher for the HDR group than for the MDR group, but did not show a statistically significant difference (p=0.07).     

Chemoradiation in Cervical Cancer with Cisplatin and High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy Combined with External Beam Radiotherapy Results of a Phase-II Study

BACKGROUND: In 1999, five randomized studies demonstrated that chemoradiation with cisplatin and low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy has a benefit in locally advanced cervical cancer and for surgically treated patients in high-risk situations. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of concomitant chemoradiation with cisplatin and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 27 patients were included in our phase-II trial: 13 locally advanced cases (group A) and 14 adjuvant-therapy patients in high-risk situations (group B). A definitive radiotherapy was performed with 25 fractions of external beam therapy (1.8 Gy per fraction/middle shielded after eleven fractions). Brachytherapy was delivered at HDR schedules with 7 Gy in point A per fraction (total dose 35 Gy) in FIGO Stages IIB-IIIB. The total dose of external and brachytherapy was 70 Gy in point A and 52-54 Gy in point B. All patients in stage IVA were treated without brachytherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed with external beam radiotherapy of the pelvis with 1.8 Gy single-dose up to 50.4 Gy. Brachytherapy was delivered at HDR schedules with two fractions of 5 Gy only in patients with tumor-positive margins or tumor involvement of the upper vagina. The chemotherapeutic treatment schedule provided six courses of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly recommended in the randomized studies GOG-120 and -123. RESULTS: A total of 18/27 patients (66.7%) completed all six courses of chemotherapy. Discontinuation of radiotherapy due to therapy-related morbidity was not necessary in the whole study group. G3 leukopenia (29.6%) was the only relevant acute toxicity. There were no differences in toxicity between group A and B. Serious late morbidity occurred in 2/27 patients (7.4%). 12/13 patients (92.3%) with IIB-IVA cervical cancer showed a complete response (CR). 13/14 adjuvant cases (92.8%) are free of recurrence (median follow up: 19.1 months). CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiation with cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly x 6 using HDR brachytherapy represents a promising treatment of cervical cancer with an acceptable toxicity.     

Image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for dose escalation in the radiotherapy treatment of locally advanced lung cancer: A single-institute experience

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical outcome after CT-guided interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for dose escalation in the radiotherapy treatment of inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods and MaterialsFrom 2005 to 2015, 16 patients with unresectable NSCLC were treated. Median age was 65.7 years (range, 52–86). The median tumor volume was 95.3 cm³ (range, 20.0–2000.0). The median prescribed HDR was 15.0 Gy (range, 7.0–32.0) delivered in twice-daily fractions of 6.0–8.0 Gy in 4 patients and in once-daily fractions of 7.0–15.0 Gy in 12 patients, respectively.ResultsAfter a median followup of 12.5 months, median overall survival and local control was 12.9 and 24.9 months, respectively. The corresponding median overall survival and local control rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 56.2%, 37.5%, and 12.5% as well as 68.9%, 57.4%, and 43%, respectively. Apart from one Grade 1 cough episode persisting for 1 week and one patient developing a minor hemopneumothorax requiring no postprocedural drainage, no other adverse events were recorded.ConclusionsCT-guided interstitial HDR brachytherapy is a safe modality for radiation dose escalation which may play a role in the definitive radiotherapy treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.     

Effect and toxicity of endoluminal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in centrally located tumors of the upper respiratory tract.

AIM: To assess effect and toxicity of high-dose-rate afterloading (HDR) alone or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in centrally located tumors of the upper respiratory tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1987 to 1996, 55 patients were treated. Twenty-one patients (group A1: 17 non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC], A2: 4 metastases from other malignancies) were treated using HDR alone due to a relapse after external beam irradiation. In 34 previously untreated and inoperable patients (group B1: 27 NSCLC, B2: 7 metastases from other malignancies) HDR was given as a boost after EBRT (30 to 60 Gy, median 50). HDR was carried out with a 192Ir source (370 GBq). The brachytherapy dose (group A: 5 to 27 Gy, median 20; B: 10 to 20 Gy, median 15) was prescribed to 1 cm distance from the source axis. A distanciable applicator was used in 39/55 patients. RESULTS: In group A1, a response rate (CR, PR) of 53% (group B1: 77%) was reached. The median survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 5 months in group A1 (B1: 20 months). The 1-, 3- and 5-year local progression free survival rates (Kaplan-Meier) were 66% (15%), 52% (0%), and 37% (0%) in group B1 (group A1). Prognostic favorable factors in group B1 were a tumor diameter < 20 mm, the lack of radiological mediastinal involvement, a complete remission, and a Karnofsky performance status > 70. Grade-1 or 2 toxicity (RTOG/EORTC) occurred in 0% in group A and in 6% in group B. We observed no Grade-3 or 4 toxicity. Complications caused by persistent or progressive local disease occurred in 3 patients in group A (fatal hemorrhage, tracheomediastinal fistula, hemoptysis) and in 2 patients in group B (fatal hemorrhage, hemoptysis). CONCLUSIONS: HDR brachytherapy is an effective treatment with moderate side effects. In combination with external beam irradiation long-term remissions can be reached in one third of the patients.     

外照射加腔内照射治疗食管癌的前瞻性研究

目的观察一定剂量的外照射后不同时期加腔内放射治疗的疗效及副作用，以探讨较适当的腔内照射时机。方法100例食管癌患者随机分2组，A组：35Gy外照射后，即开始内外照射同期进行。B组：50Gy外照射后开始腔内照射。两组外照射总吸收剂量均为50Gy，采用常规分割照射，1.8—2Gy，次，5次，周。腔内照射5Gy，次，每周1次，共2次。结果A组的1、3和5年局控率分别为60．2％、39．8％和36．2％，B组的1、3和5年局控率分别为54．1％、32．8％和29．2％；P=0．5118。两组的1、3和5年生存率分别为52．0％、26．0％、21．8％和54．0％、23．4％、16．7％，P=0．8159。A组和B组急性放射性食管炎的发生率分别为70％（35/50）和48％（24/50），P=0．038，但严重的食管炎（Ⅲ级及以上）的发生率相当，均为4％。A组和B组食管瘘的发生率分别为8％（4／50）和10％（5／50）。结论于35Gy外照射后同期加腔内照射及外照射50Gy结束后即局部补加腔内照射均是可行的。两种治疗方案相比，前者急性放射性食管炎的发生率高于后者，但晚期并发症无增加。     

乳腺癌保乳术后放射治疗的疗效观察

目的观察乳腺癌保乳术后放射治疗的疗效和美观效果。方法109例保乳术后在我科接受全乳外照射和瘤床加量(boost)放疗,79例应用高剂量率插植技术,T1肿瘤用单排插植,针距为1.5cm,T2以上肿瘤用双排或三排插植。针距间单次剂量(DB)10～12Gy,靶区周边剂量为85%DB。30例采用电子线常规外照射15Gy。全乳照射应用6MV直线加速器,采用双切线半野照射技术,靶区剂量为45～52Gy(平均48.6Gy)。采用医生评分与患者问卷方法评价美观效果。结果全组109例应用KaplanMeier方法统计5年实际生存率为93.8%。局部复发率为6.5%。全组无放射性溃疡发生,5例出现位于插植针孔周围急性皮肤炎症。在经临床随访体检的75例中,医生打分和患者自评满意度为优的比例分别为87%和81%,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。48例经组织间插植加量放疗;27例经电子线外照加量放疗。两组满意度医生总评为优的患者比例分别为81.2%和85.2%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论乳腺癌保乳术后放疗可降低局部复发率,并发症少。不同的瘤床加量放疗方法不影响美观效果。