Safety of selective nonoperative management for blunt splenic trauma: the impact of concomitant injuries

Background

Nonoperative management for blunt splenic injury is the preferred treatment. To improve the outcome of selective nonoperative therapy, the current challenge is to identify factors that predict failure. Little is known about the impact of concomitant injury on outcome. Our study has two goals. First, to determine whether concomitant injury affects the safety of selective nonoperative treatment. Secondly we aimed to identify factors that can predict failure.

Methods

From our prospective trauma registry we selected all nonoperatively treated adult patients with blunt splenic trauma admitted between 01.01.2000 and 12.21.2013. All concurrent injuries with an AIS?≥?2 were scored. We grouped and compared patients sustaining solitary splenic injuries and patients with concomitant injuries. To identify specific factors that predict failure we used a multivariable regression analysis.

Results

A total of 79 patients were included. Failure of nonoperative therapy (n =?11) and complications only occurred in patients sustaining concomitant injury. Furthermore, ICU-stay as well as hospitalization time were significantly prolonged in the presence of associated injury (4 versus 13?days,p <?0.05). Mortality was not seen. Multivariable analysis revealed the presence of a femur fracture and higher age as predictors of failure.

Conclusions

Nonoperative management for hemodynamically normal patients with blunt splenic injury is feasible and safe, even in the presence of concurrent (non-hollow organ) injuries or a contrast blush on CT. However, associated injuries are related to prolonged intensive care unit- and hospital stay, complications, and failure of nonoperative management. Specifically, higher age and the presence of a femur fracture are predictors of failure.

     

Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in adults

The use of selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in adults is based on the undeniable benefits of this approach in children. Proper patient selection requires hemodynamic stability, lack of generalized peritoneal irritation, and minimal blood transfusion needs. Computed tomography is now used to make the diagnosis, but the decision for laparotomy is based on clinical grounds. Forty-one (87%) of 47 patients selected for nonoperative management were treated successfully without laparotomy, while the remaining 6 patients underwent delayed operations for persistent splenic bleeding. Blood transfusion requirements were significantly less in the observed group than in the operative group for patients with isolated trauma and for patients with polytrauma. There were no known missed intra-abdominal injuries and no deaths with the nonoperative approach. Analysis of our results has confirmed that nonoperative management is a safe and effective alternative to immediate laparotomy in properly selected patients and it can result in splenic salvage without the need for an operation.     

Prospective evaluation of criteria for the nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma

Recent reports have shown an increased mortality associated with the nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury. We have prospectively applied criteria developed from our previous 15-year experience for the nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury. These criteria consist of 1) hemodynamic stability on admission or after initial resuscitation with up to two liters of crystalloid infusion, 2) no physical findings or any associated injuries necessitating laparotomy, and 3) a transfusion requirement attributable to the splenic injury of 2 units or less. From 1994 through 2000 a total of 99 patients presented with blunt splenic injury. Thirty-one patients (31%) underwent splenectomy secondary to hemodynamic instability. During the observation period eight of the 68 patients (12%) who initially met criteria for NOM developed hemodynamic instability and underwent splenectomy. All NOM failures occurred within 72 hours of admission. There was no mortality associated with splenic injury in the NOM (Group I) or in the group failing NOM (Group II), and no associated morbidities from the splenic injury were seen in either group. No significant differences were seen between Groups I and II in terms of age, gender, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, admitting systolic blood pressure, admitting hemoglobin, transfusion requirements, intensive care unit length of stay, or total hospital length of stay (all P > 0.200). We conclude that established criteria for intervention and careful observation in an intensive care setting for at least 72 hours will minimize morbidity or mortality associated with blunt splenic injury in adults.     

The significance of pseudoaneurysms in the nonoperative management of pediatric blunt splenic trauma

Purpose

Nonoperative management is the standard of care for hemodynamically stable pediatric and adult blunt splenic injuries. In adults, most centers follow a well-defined protocol involving repeated imaging at 24 to 48 hours, with embolization of splenic pseudoaneurysms (SAPs). In children, the significance of radiologically detected SAP has yet to be clarified.

Methods

A systematic review of the medical literature was conducted to analyze the outcomes of documented posttraumatic SAP in the pediatric population.

Results

Sixteen articles, including 1 prospective study, 4 retrospective reviews, and 11 case reports were reviewed. Forty-five SAPs were reported. Ninety-six percent of children were reported as stable. Yet, 82% underwent splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, or embolization. The fear of delayed complications owing to SAP was often cited as the reason for intervention in otherwise stable children. Only one child with a documented pseudoaneurysm experienced a delayed splenic rupture while under observation. No deaths were reported.

Conclusions

There is no evidence to support or dispute the routine use of follow-up imaging and embolization of posttraumatic SAP in the pediatric population. At present, the decision to treat SAP in stable children is at the discretion of the treating physician. A prospective study is needed to clarify this issue.     

Blunt liver trauma in children: nonoperative management

Since 1978, we have treated 19 of 23 (83%) children with blunt liver trauma nonoperatively. Management consisted of observation in an intensive care unit, repeated physical examination, frequent reevaluation of laboratory values, special investigations, and bed rest. The 19 patients all remained stable, required no surgical intervention, and showed resolution of the hepatic injuries with no early or delayed complications. Ultrasonography, although not as reliable a method as computed tomography or liver isotope scans for identification of hepatic trauma at first presentation, provided a very useful method for documenting subsequent progress and eventual healing of the lesions. The presence of an isolated hepatic injury is insufficient indication for surgery. If there is significant extrahepatic injury requiring surgery, or if the patient with hepatic trauma is deteriorating, operative intervention is mandatory.     

Trend toward nonoperative management of splenic injuries

Treatment of splenic injuries has evolved over the past decade to reflect more effort to conserve function of the spleen. Records of 169 patients admitted over a 6-year period were identified as documenting the treatment of splenic injuries. We collected data regarding patient age, gender, degree of hemodynamic stability, number of units of blood required, severity of splenic injury, Injury Severity Score, and results of treatment. There were 143 adults (age greater than 16 years) and 26 pediatric patients (age less than 17 years), with mean age in the 2 groups of 31.6 and 11.4 years, respectively. Males comprised 72% of the group, and blunt injury occurred in 154 of the 169 patients. In the adults, splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, laparotomy without operative treatment of the spleen, and nonoperative management were observed 48%, 30%, 14%, and 8% of the time and in the pediatric group 31%, 27%, 19%, and 23% of the time, respectively. By using operative splenic repair techniques and increased use of nonoperative management, the splenic salvage rate has increased in the last 6 years from 41% to 61% without an increase in morbidity and mortality. Incidence of spleen salvage correlated with severity of spleen and overall injury and cardiovascular stability.     

Immune consequences of nonoperative treatment of splenic trauma in the rat model

To investigate the immunologic consequences of non-operative management of splenic injury, three parameters were studied: survival following pneumococcal sepsis, clearance of blood-borne bacteria, following Hemophilus influenzae challenge, and antibody response to type III pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide. Two hundred twenty-five Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups and subjected either to a splenectomy, a sham operation, or standard blunt trauma. A significant increase in mortality was noted in the splenectomized group as compared with both the traumatized and control groups when challenged with Streptococcus pneumoniae. In both the control and trauma groups, H influenzae cleared significantly within 18 hours. Blood-borne bacteria persisted at the same level for 72 hours in the splenectomized animals. Four and 11 days later, the antibody level in both traumatized and control groups was higher than in the splenectomized subjects (P less than .001). There was no difference in the serum antibody level between the control and trauma groups at four days. However, at 11 days the trauma group showed a significant decrease in the antibody level (P less than .05). It can be concluded that following spontaneously-healing splenic trauma in the rat model, survival, bacterial clearance, and antibody response were all superior to that observed in the splenectomized subjects. In addition, the healed splenic disruption did not impair clearance of blood-borne encapsulated bacteria.     

The impact of splenic artery embolization on the management of splenic trauma: an 8-year review

Background

Splenic artery embolization (SAE) is an adjunct to nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injuries. We reviewed our experience with SAE to identify its impact on splenic operations.

Methods

Patients admitted with splenic injuries over an 8-year period were identified and the initial method of management noted (simple observation, SAE, or splenic surgery). The first 4 years (period 1) during which SAE was introduced was compared with the latter 4 years (period 2) when it was used frequently.

Results

There were 304 patients in period 1 and 416 in period 2. NOM was initial management in 59.9% in period 1% and 60.1% in period 2 (P = 1.0) and failure rates were 5.3% versus 2.9%, respectively (P = .12). More SAE procedures were performed in period 2—13.7% versus 4.9% (P ≤.001)—and there was a reduction in the proportion of splenic operations—35.2% versus 26.2% (P <.01).

Conclusions

SAE is associated with a reduction in splenic operations, although it did not alter the failure rate of NOM.     

闭合性腹部损伤脾破裂非手术治疗的探讨

目的探讨闭合性腹部创伤脾破裂非手术治疗的可行性。方法对１９９５年１月至１９９７年３月间行手术和非手术治疗的３２倒闭合性腹部创伤脾破裂患者的临床表现和治疗结果进行回顾性分析。结果脾破裂非手术治疗患者１２例占同期脾破裂病例的３７．５％（１２／３２）,男１０例,女２例,平均年龄３５岁（１６～５０岁）。非手术组患者其损伤程度较手术组患者轻。非手术治疗失败１例,治疗成功率９２％。平均住院日为１６天,出院随访１～２７个月未发现有并发症,其中１０例随访３个月以上,其ＣＴ检查示脾脏损伤均已愈合。结论合适的选择脾破裂患者行非手术治疗是安全、有效的。     

Splenic abscess following nonoperative management of splenic rupture

A recent case of posttraumatic splenic abscess in a young man following nonoperative management of his splenic rupture is reported. With the recent trend toward nonoperative management of hemodynamically stable splenic rupture, the potential complications of splenic abscess may become more common. In view of the high mortality associated with unrecognized splenic abscess, it is important for the clinician to be aware of this entity.     

Long-term outcome of nonoperative pediatric splenic injury management

Background

Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic trauma is the standard of care in hemodynamically stable children. The long-term risk of this strategy remains unknown. The object of this study was to investigate the incidence of long-term complications after NOM of pediatric splenic injury.

Methods

All children who underwent NOM for blunt splenic trauma over an 11-year period were identified. Patients were interviewed for any ailments that could be related to their splenic injury, and hospital data were analyzed.

Results

A total of 266 patients were identified, and 228 patients (86%) were interviewed. Mean follow-up time was 5 ± 3 years. One patient had a delayed complication, a splenic pseudocyst. Pain more than 4 weeks after injury was unusual. Time until return to full activity varied broadly.

Conclusion

The incidence of long-term complications after NOM of pediatric splenic injury was 1 (0.44%) in 228 patients. Nonoperative management of pediatric blunt splenic trauma in children is associated with a minimal risk of long-term complications.     

The non-operative management of splenic trauma.

Non-operative management of splenic trauma is not a widely accepted method of treatment. During the period 1964 to 1976, 39 children were treated in the Adelaide Children's Hospital for splenic trauma. Twenty-four were managed without operation, while 15 were treated by splenectomy. Recently, splenic scan has helped in the diagnosis and management of splenic injuries. From our observations, it appears that non-operative treatment of a proven splenic injury is safe and the ideal initial treatment in the paediatric age group, when the spleen is the only intraabdominal organ injured, and the vital signs are stable with the application of adequate resuscitative measures.     

Protocol-driven nonoperative management in patients with blunt splenic trauma and minimal associated injury decreases length of stay

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of more selective use of admission angiography combined with protocolized nonoperative management for blunt splenic injury. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients with splenic injuries and Injury Severity Score < 20 managed by protocol and comparison with a prior matched group managed with admission angiography. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were managed under the protocol, with 22 patients treated with admission angiography and the remainder undergoing observation only. Nonoperative salvage was 100% in this group, with a length of stay of 3.3 days. The matched, nonprotocol group had a nonoperative salvage rate of 95%, with a length of stay of 6.8 days. CONCLUSION: Protocol-driven management of splenic injury using admission angiography selectively for higher grade splenic injuries led to a decreased length of stay, higher therapeutic yield, and decreased use of hospital resources without any increase in the failure rate of nonoperative management in a selected group of patients with isolated splenic injuries.     

Controversies in the management of splenic trauma

BackgroundThe technologic innovations of the last three decades, coupled with a deeper understanding of the immunologic role of the spleen, have significantly shifted the management of splenic injuries towards non-operative approaches. However, there continuous to be a wide range of practice patterns related to the non-operative management of splenic injuries, from which the authors infer a gap between the best available evidence and its translation into practice. We sought to explore ongoing areas of controversy in the non-operative management of splenic trauma with the aim of further elucidating why these controversies continue to exist.MethodsWe explored areas of ongoing controversy in the management of splenic injury though a series of iterative surveys. We invited 70 experts in trauma care from ten countries around the world to participate. Areas of controversy explored included: indications and frequency for in-hospital and follow-up imaging, definitions of failure of non-operative management, indications for angioembolisation and non-operative management in special populations (i.e. elderly, concomitant traumatic brain injury, penetrating trauma).ResultsA 49% response rate was obtained. Even though a wide range of practice patterns were identified, no controversies were identified in areas that do not involve the adoption of new technologies. In areas where practice pattern variation was observed, the strong influence of the local environment was constantly identified as an impediment to changes in practice.ConclusionsWe have identified that barriers present within local practice environments are the major driving forces behind controversies in the non-operative management of splenic injuries.     

Changing trends in the management of splenic injury

: A gradual change in the management of splenic injuries has occurred at our institution. This study was therefore undertaken to determine whether changes in management of splenic injury influenced outcomes during the past 30 years. : A retrospective study of patients admitted with splenic trauma between 1965 and 1994 was performed. Two hundred seven patients were identified and demographic and outcome data were recorded. Patients were then grouped based upon the period in which they received treatment (ie, Period I [1965 to 1974], Period II [1975 to 1984], and Period III [1985 to 1994]) and the type of treatment received (ie, splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, or observation). : More patients were treated in Period III than in the other two periods, and Period III patients had shorter hospital stays. Splenectomy was solely used during Period I; splenorrhaphy and observation were occasionally performed during Period II; and splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, and observation were performed in near-equal numbers during Period III. Mortality was similar for each period, though Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were higher during later years. When compared by treatment modality, patients receiving splenectomy had higher ISS and splenic injury classifications. : Patients treated by splenorrhaphy and observation for splenic injury have markedly increased over the past 30 years without adverse outcome.     

Correlation of operative and pathological injury grade with computed tomographic grade in the failed nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma

Background

Computed tomography (CT) is the standard for grading blunt splenic injuries, but the true accuracy, especially for grade IV or V injuries as compared to pathological findings, is unknown.

Study design

A retrospective study from 2005 to 2011 was undertaken.

Results

There were 214 adults admitted with blunt splenic injury and 170 (79%) were managed nonoperatively. The remaining 44 patients (21%) required surgical intervention. There was a significant difference in the Injury Severity Score (ISS) between those who did and those who did not require splenectomy: median 31 (interquartile [IQ] range 11–51) versus 22 (IQ range 9–35, p?=?0.0002). Ten patients presented in shock, had a positive ultrasound, and went to surgery. The remaining 34 had CT scans prior to surgery. Twenty-five (73%) had injury grades IV or V. The CT scan correctly graded the injury in 14 (41%) and was incorrect in 20 (59%). The assigned grade by the CT scan underestimated the true injury grade by one grade in six cases (30%), by two or more grades in nine (45%), and the CT images were obscured by blood and deemed “ungradeable” in five (25%). The CT scan was more accurate for grades I and II (100%) than for grades III–V (25–43%). The reasons for inaccuracy were either inability to visualize that the laceration involved the hilar vessels or excessive perisplenic blood which obscured the injury and/or the hilum.

Conclusions

CT for splenic injury is accurate for grades I and II, but underestimates the true extent of injury for grades III–V. The reasons for the lack of correlation are the inability to determine hilar involvement and excessive perisplenic blood obscuring the injury. Patients with these image characteristics by CT scan should undergo splenectomy earlier if there are any signs of hemodynamic instability.