首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到2条相似文献,搜索用时 1 毫秒
1.
《Vaccine》2019,37(30):4147-4154
BackgroundSerotype-specific vaccine efficacy (VE) against adult community acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains poorly defined, yet such data are important for assessing the utility of adult pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) programs.MethodsWe evaluated the Community Acquired Pneumonia Immunization Trial in Adults to assess serotype-specific VE for CAP. This parallel-arm randomized clinical trial assessed 13-valent PCV (PCV13) VE among community dwelling persons aged ≥65 years in The Netherlands. In the original analysis, PCV13 VE against first episodes of vaccine-type (VT) chest radiology confirmed CAP was 45.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.8–62.5%). Unlike the original analysis, we included any subject that met a clinical definition of CAP regardless of radiographic findings. VT-CAP was identified by culture (sterile or non-sterile) or serotype-specific urinary antigen detection (SSUAD) test. Only the five serotypes with at least 10 episodes in the control arm, based on the original analysis, were included for VE assessment.ResultsOf 272 clinical CAP visits with VT serotypes identified, 253 (93%) were identified by SSUAD including 210 (77%) by SSUAD alone. VE was determined for serotypes 1, 3, 6A, 7F, and 19A, with total first episodes of, respectively, 27, 36, 25, 38, and 48. VE (95%CI) for the five evaluated serotypes against first clinical CAP episodes were: serotype 1, 20.0% (−83.1% to 65.8%); serotype 3, 61.5% (17.6–83.4%); serotype 6A, 33.3% (−58.6% to 73.2%); serotype 7F, 73.3% (40.5–89.4%); and serotype 19A, 45.2% (−2.2% to 71.5%).DiscussionStatistically significant VE was observed for serotypes 3 and 7F for clinical CAP among elderly community dwelling adults. The VE point estimates and CIs for serotypes 1, 6A, and 19A were lower but consistent with the overall VT-CAP VE of 45.6% previously reported. These findings may be relevant in models to accurately account for the potential impact of adult PCV13 immunization.  相似文献   

2.

Objective

To determine whether an intervention based on patient-practitioner communication is more effective than usual care in improving diabetes self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes with low educational level.

Methods

12-month, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Nine physicians and 184 patients registered at two practices in a deprived area of Granada (Andalusia, Spain) participated in the study. Adult patients with type 2 diabetes, low educational level and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 7% (53.01 mmol/mol) were eligible. The physicians in the intervention group received training on communication skills and the use of a tool for monitoring glycaemic control and providing feedback to patients. The control group continued standard care. The primary outcome was difference in HbA1c after 12 months. Dyslipidaemia, blood pressure, body mass index and waist circumference were also assessed as secondary outcomes. Two-level (patient and provider) regression analyses controlling for sex, social support and comorbidity were conducted.

Results

The HbA1c levels at 12 months decreased in both groups. Multilevel analysis showed a greater improvement in the intervention group (between-group HbA1c difference= 0.16; p = 0.049). No statistically significant differences between groups were observed for dyslipidaemia, blood pressure, body mass index and waist circumference.

Conclusions

In this pragmatic study, a simple and inexpensive intervention delivered in primary care showed a modest benefit in glycaemic control compared with usual care, although no effect was observed in the secondary outcomes. Further research is needed to design and assess interventions to promote diabetes self-management in socially vulnerable patients.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号