The Dutch National Living Donor Kidney Exchange Program

The wait time for deceased-donor kidney transplantation has increased to 4-5 years in the Netherlands. Strategies to expand the donor pool include a living donor kidney exchange program. This makes it possible that patients who cannot directly receive a kidney from their intended living donor, due to ABO blood type incompatibility or a positive cross match, exchange donors in order to receive a compatible kidney. All Dutch kidney transplantation centers agreed on a common protocol. An independent organization is responsible for the allocation, cross matches are centrally performed and exchange takes place on an anonymous basis. Donors travel to the recipient centers. Surgical procedures are scheduled simultaneously. Sixty pairs participated within 1 year. For 9 of 29 ABO blood type incompatible and 17 of 31 cross match positive combinations, a compatible pair was found. Five times a cross match positive couple was matched to a blood type incompatible one, where the recipients were of blood type O. The living donor kidney exchange program is a successful approach that does not harm any of the candidates on the deceased donor kidney waitlist. For optimal results, both ABO blood type incompatible and cross match positive pairs should participate.     

Increasing access to kidney transplantation in countries with limited resources: The Indian experience with Kidney Paired Donation

According to the Indian chronic kidney disease registry, in 2010 only 2% of end stage kidney disease patients were managed with kidney transplantation, 37% were managed with dialysis and 61% were treated conservatively without renal replacement therapy. In countries like India, where a well‐organized deceased donor kidney transplantation program is not available, living donor kidney transplantation is the major source of organs for kidney transplantation. The most common reason to decline a donor for directed living donation is ABO incompatibility, which eliminates up to one third of the potential living donor pool. Because access to transplantation with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)‐desensitization protocols and ABO incompatible transplantation is very limited due to high costs and increased risk of infections from more intense immunosuppression, kidney paired donation (KPD) promises hope to a growing number of end stage kidney disease patients. KPD is a rapidly growing and cost‐effective living donor kidney transplantation strategy for patients who are incompatible with their healthy, willing living donor. In principle, KPD is feasible for any centre that performs living donor kidney transplantation. In transplant centres with a large living donor kidney transplantation program KPD does not require extra infrastructure, decreases waiting time, avoids transplant tourism and prevents commercial trafficking. Although KPD is still underutilized in India, it has been performed more frequently in recent times. To substantially increase donor pool and transplant rates, transplant centres should work together towards a national KPD program and frame a uniform acceptable allocation policy.     

An update on ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation

ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation is nowadays a well‐established procedure to expand living donor transplantation to blood group incompatible donor/recipient constellations. In the last two decades, transplantation protocols evolved to more specific isohaemagglutinin elimination techniques and established competent antirejection protection protocols without the need of splenectomy. ABOi kidney transplantation associated accommodation despite isohaemagglutinin reappearance, C4d positivity of peritubular capillaries as well as the increased incidence of bleeding complications is currently under intense investigation. However, most recent data show excellent graft survival rates equivalent to ABO‐compatible kidney transplantation outcome.     

An economic assessment of contemporary kidney transplant practice

Kidney transplantation is the optimal therapy for end‐stage renal disease, prolonging survival and reducing spending. Prior economic analyses of kidney transplantation, using Markov models, have generally assumed compatible, low‐risk donors. The economic implications of transplantation with high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) deceased donors, ABO incompatible living donors, and HLA incompatible living donors have not been assessed. The costs of transplantation and dialysis were compared with the use of discrete event simulation over a 10‐year period, with data from the United States Renal Data System, University HealthSystem Consortium, and literature review. Graft failure rates and expenditures were adjusted for donor characteristics. All transplantation options were associated with improved survival compared with dialysis (transplantation: 5.20‐6.34 quality‐adjusted life‐years [QALYs] vs dialysis: 4.03 QALYs). Living donor and low‐KDPI deceased donor transplantations were cost‐saving compared with dialysis, while transplantations using high‐KDPI deceased donor, ABO‐incompatible or HLA‐incompatible living donors were cost‐effective (<$100 000 per QALY). Predicted costs per QALY range from $39 939 for HLA‐compatible living donor transplantation to $80 486 for HLA‐incompatible donors compared with $72 476 for dialysis. In conclusion, kidney transplantation is cost‐effective across all donor types despite higher costs for marginal organs and innovative living donor practices.     

ABO incompatible kidney transplantation - an analysis of UNOS Registry data

BACKGROUND: The ABO incompatible kidney transplants have been performed successfully from large numbers of living donors and some blood type A2 deceased donors. However, there are few reports to support the feasibility of ABO incompatible transplants from non-A2 deceased donors. This problem was examined in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data file. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The UNOS Registry data of kidney transplants performed between 1995 and 2003 from 256 centers was utilized for Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests to compare graft and functional graft survival rates. RESULTS: Deceased donor transplants from all ABO incompatible donors had the same graft survival rates, as that from ABO compatible donors regardless of whether the blood group incompatibility was A (A1), A2 or B. Graft survival from 201 ABO incompatible donors was 66.9% at 5 yr, compared with 66.7% for ABO compatible donors (p = 0.83). Non-A2 incompatible donors also yielded comparable survival rates to ABO compatible donors. From living donors, ABO incompatible donors yielded significantly lower graft survival rates than the ABO compatible group, although long-term graft survival rates of those who survived >1 yr did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Except higher initial graft loss possibility because of insufficient removal of antibodies, non-A2 kidneys yielded equivalent graft survival rates to ABO compatible transplants. In addition to A2 incompatibilities, Blood group A1 and B incompatibilities can also be considered in ABO incompatible transplants.     

Donor Kidney Exchanges

Kidney transplantation from live donors achieves an excellent outcome regardless of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch. This development has expanded the opportunity of kidney transplantation from unrelated live donors. Nevertheless, the hazard of hyperacute rejection has usually precluded the transplantation of a kidney from a live donor to a potential recipient who is incompatible by ABO blood type or HLA antibody crossmatch reactivity. Region 1 of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) has devised an alternative system of kidney transplantation that would enable either a simultaneous exchange between live donors (a paired exchange), or a live donor/deceased donor exchange to incompatible recipients who are waiting on the list (a live donor/list exchange). This Regional system of exchange has derived the benefit of live donation, avoided the risk of ABO or crossmatch incompatibility, and yielded an additional donor source for patients awaiting a deceased donor kidney. Despite the initial disadvantage to the list of patients awaiting an O blood type kidney, as every paired exchange transplant removes a patient from the waiting list, it also avoids the incompatible recipient from eventually having to go on the list. Thus, this approach also increases access to deceased donor kidneys for the remaining candidates on the list.     

Current status of organ transplantation in Japan

To overcome severe donor shortage, Japanese doctors over the years have developed innovative strategies to maximize organs transplanted per brain death donor and expanded the donor pool using living donors. They also used living and marginal organs and drastically improved living donor lung, liver, pancreas and kidney transplantations. Moreover, they initiated ABO blood type incompatible liver transplantation advancements and succeeded in overcoming the blood type barrier in kidney and liver transplantations. Similar efforts are underway for pancreas transplantation. Furthermore, Japanese doctors have developed a nonaggressive step to achieve immunosuppression following organ transplantation by carefully monitoring donor-specific hyporesponsiveness and infectious immunostatus. However, the institution of amendments to allocation systems and the intensification of efforts to decrease living donor morbidity and to increase the number of brain death donors have remained important issues needing attention. Overall, the strategies Japan has adopted to overcome donor shortage can provide useful insights on how to increase organ transplantations.     

Successful ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation in a patient with high isoagglutinin titer using high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin

The optimal management in living donor liver transplantation using an ABO incompatible donor with a high isoagglutinin titer is still uncertain. Our patient was a 20-year-old woman with fulminant hepatitis. The only available donor was her 54-year-old father-in-law of an incompatible blood type. The initial isoagglutinin titer was 2048x. She received 375 mg/m2 of anti-CD20 antibody 3 days before the living donor liver transplantation with concomitant splenectomy. Despite daily plasma exchanges after transplantation, the isoagglutinin titer started to shoot up to its maximum value of 2048x, with a sudden decline in the bile output. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (0.6 g/kg) was given after the plasma exchanges; thereafter, her liver function tests stabilized without a further increase in the isoagglutinin titer. We showed the effectiveness of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin for the management of the rebound elevation of isoagglutinin titer. The combination of anti-CD20 antibody and daily plasma exchanges seemed ineffective for such a situation. This strategy might be another management option for ABO incompatible liver transplantation.     

Living donor liver paired exchange: A North American first

Paired organ exchange can be used to circumvent living donor-recipient ABO incompatibilities. Herein, we present the first case of successful liver paired exchange in North America. This 2-way swap required 4 simultaneous operations: 2 living donor hepatectomies and 2 living donor liver transplants. A nondirected anonymous living donor gift initiated this domino exchange, alleviating an ABO incompatibility in the other donor-recipient pair. With careful attention to ethical and logistical issues, paired liver exchange is a feasible option to expand the donor pool for incompatible living liver donor-recipient pairs.     

Tailored desensitization strategies in ABO blood group antibody incompatible renal transplantation

ABO blood group incompatible renal transplantation, using desensitization procedures, is an effective strategy. Efforts have been made to reduce desensitization: these are usually applied to all patients indiscriminately. The Guy's Hospital ABO blood group incompatible desensitization regimen uses a tiered approach, tailoring strategy according to initial antibody titres. Sixty‐two ABO blood group incompatible living donor transplant recipients were compared with 167 recipients of blood group compatible living donor renal transplants. There were no statistically significant differences in allograft survival rates at 1 or 3 years post‐transplant, rejection in the first year post‐transplant or renal function in the first 3 years post‐transplant. There was a higher rate of death in ABO blood group incompatible transplant recipients – this could be associated with differences in age and HLA mismatch between the two groups. Four ABO blood group incompatible patients experienced antibody‐mediated rejection (no episode was associated with a rise in ABO blood group antibodies). Of the patients who received no desensitization, or rituximab alone, none has experienced antibody mediated rejection or experienced allograft loss. Tailoring the use of desensitization in ABO blood group incompatible renal transplantation according to initial ABO blood group antibody titres led to comparable results to blood group compatible transplantation.     

Increasing the opportunity of live kidney donation by matching for two- and three-way exchanges

BACKGROUND: To expand the opportunity for paired live donor kidney transplantation, computerized matching algorithms have been designed to identify maximal sets of compatible donor/recipient pairs from a registry of incompatible pairs submitted as candidates for transplantation. METHODS: Demographic data of patients who had been evaluated for live donor kidney transplantation but found to be incompatible with their potential donor (because of ABO blood group or positive crossmatch) were submitted for computer analysis and matching. Data included ABO and HLA types of donor and recipient, %PRA and specificity of recipient alloantibody, donor/recipient relationship, and the reason the donor was incompatible. The data set used for the initial simulation included 29 patients with one donor each and 16 patients with multiple donors for a total of 45 patients and 68 donor/patient pairs. In addition, a simulation based on OPTN/SRTR data was used to further assess the practical importance of multiple exchange combinations. RESULTS: If only exchanges involving two patient-donor pairs were allowed, a maximum of 8 patient-donor pairs in the data set could exchange kidneys. If three-way exchanges were also allowed, a maximum of 11 pairs could exchange kidneys. Simulations with OPTN/SRTR data demonstrate that the increase in the number of potential transplants if three-way exchanges are allowed is robust, and does not depend on the particular patients in our sample. CONCLUSIONS: A computerized matching protocol can be used to identify donor/recipient pairs from a registry of incompatible pairs who can potentially enter into donor exchanges that otherwise would not readily occur.     

Living donor kidney transplantation: ethical aspects

Fifty years after the first kidney grafts, the ethical problems raised by harvesting an organ from a living donor remain a difficult issue for the French nephrology community. We summarize here the ethical principles guiding biomedicine. Respect for human rights requires careful control ensuring that all potential donors receive complete neutral information and are spared from any type of pressure. The principle of not causing harm must be considered in the context of modern medicine where, under certain conditions, individual risk related to a medical intervention is considered acceptable. Living-donor transplantation can have a potentially beneficial effect for the donor and improves access to grafts for patients whose only other solution would be a cadaver graft. We also discuss nonconventional living donors: ABO or HLA incompatible spouses and at-risk donors, for example, elderly donors.     

Allocation and matching in kidney exchange programs

Living donor kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients suffering from end‐stage renal disease. To alleviate the shortage of kidney donors, many advances have been made to improve the utilization of living donors deemed incompatible with their intended recipient. The most prominent of these advances is kidney paired donation (KPD), which matches incompatible patient–donor pairs to facilitate a kidney exchange. This review discusses the various approaches to matching and allocation in KPD. In particular, it focuses on the underlying principles of matching and allocation approaches, the combination of KPD with other strategies such as ABO incompatible transplantation, the organization of KPD, and important future challenges. As the transplant community strives to balance quantity and equity of transplants to achieve the best possible outcomes, determining the right long‐term allocation strategy becomes increasingly important. In this light, challenges include making full use of the various modalities that are now available through integrated and optimized matching software, encouragement of transplant centers to fully participate, improving transplant rates by focusing on the expected long‐run number of transplants, and selecting uniform allocation criteria to facilitate international pools.     

ABO incompatible kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although ABO incompatible kidney transplantation is increasingly recognized as effective, the procedure is still evolving. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent advances in this area. RECENT FINDINGS: Short to intermediate-term outcome appears good, although long-term results are still preliminary. Pretransplant risk stratification based on antidonor antibody titer may be of limited value. Splenectomy, previously reported to be an important component of ABO incompatible transplantation, appears to be avoidable under many circumstances. The wider implementation of A2 blood group incompatible transplantation shortens waiting time for deceased donor transplantation of blood group B recipients without significantly disadvantaging others. The diagnosis of acute humoral rejection has become clearer following the recognition that C4d deposition commonly occurs in well functioning ABO incompatible allografts. The long-term implications of acute humoral rejection appear substantial even following successful acute therapy, with a significant percentage of patients developing chronic humoral rejection manifested as transplant glomerulopathy. Finally, although ABO incompatible transplantation entails increased expense, when compared with maintenance dialysis and taking into account the health related quality of life benefits of a successful transplant, it is clearly cost effective. SUMMARY: ABO incompatible kidney transplantation is an effective therapy, and will become more widely implemented in the future.     

Media appeals by pediatric patients for living donors and the impact on a transplant center

Little is published regarding the effect of advertising for kidney donors on transplant centers. At our center, families of nine children used media appeals. Per candidate, there were 8 to 260 potential donor calls, 92 (11.6%) were medically ineligible, 326 (41.1%) voluntarily did not proceed or an alternate donor had been approved, 38 (4.8%) were ABO incompatible, and 327 (41.1%) had positive crossmatch or unsuitable human leukocyte antigens. Media appeals resulted in four living donor transplants and five nondirected donors to other candidates, and we made directed changes in our center. The ethical debate of advertising for organ donors continues.     

Increased bile duct complications in liver transplantation across the ABO barrier.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the outcome of liver grafts from ABO incompatible donors, focusing on biliary complications, and compared the results to an ABO compatible control group. Also, the expression of donor ABH antigens in the liver graft was analyzed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The outcome of liver transplantation using an ABO incompatible graft is still debated. These blood group related (ABH) antigens are known to be expressed not only on the surface of the erythrocytes, but also on the epithelial cells of large bile ducts. Because the biliary epithelium of hepatic allografts may continue to express donor ABH antigens, it may be more susceptible to immunologic bile duct injury after transplantation across the ABO barrier. METHODS: Eighteen ABO incompatible grafts were compared with 18 ABO compatible grafts in patients who were matched according to medical urgency, primary liver disease (PLD), and recipient age. After transplantation, the grafts were analyzed with cholangiography, Doppler ultrasound, or arteriography and liver histology according to protocol. Immunoperoxidase staining for ABH antigens was performed on hepatic tissue. RESULTS: Biliary complications developed in 82% of the ABO incompatible donors, compared to 6% of the ABO matched controls. Hepatic artery thrombosis occurred in 24%. Cellular rejection was diagnosed in 65% versus only 28% in the control group. The 1-year actuarial graft survival rate was 44% versus 78% in the control group. ABH antigens of the donor were expressed on vascular endothelium and bile duct epithelial cells as long as 150 days after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Using ABO incompatible allografts, a high incidence of biliary and hepatic artery complications and decreased graft survival in liver transplantation were found. An immunologic injury to the bile duct epithelium and/or to vascular endothelium is suspected.     

Successful renal contraction therapy in polycystic kidney patient with renal transcatheter arterial embolization prior to ABO incompatible kidney transplantation

28-year-old female received dialysis treatment due to chronic renal failure caused by polycystic kidney disease. Later, she underwent a laparoscopic splenectomy and ABO incompatible living kidney transplantation successfully following bilateral renal contraction therapy with renal transcatheter arterial embolization (renal TAE). A unilateral or bilateral native nephrectomy of a massively enlarged kidney performed at the time of renal transplantation is a common treatment in polycystic kidney patients scheduled for transplantation. On the other hand, when treated with renal TAE, such patients can avoid a laparotomy, which provides several advantages when undergoing peritoneal dialysis in the future or a laparoscopic splenectomy prior to ABO incompatible kidney transplantation. Furthermore, we consider that bilateral renal TAE is necessary for polycystic kidney patients prior to renal transplantation for a variety of reasons, including problems associated with contrast nephropathy if renal TAE for left kidney is remained after renal transplantation.     

ABO blood group incompatible kidney transplantation: a case report and review of the literature

A patient with end-stage renal failure, two previously failed kidney transplants and high serum lymphocytotoxic antibody levels was transplanted electively with an ABO-mismatched, HLA-identical kidney from his sibling. Immunosuppression consisted of pretransplant splenectomy and plasma exchange, followed by rabbit antithymocyte serum, azathioprine, prednisone and plasma exchange in the early post-transplant period. He is now 3 years post-transplant with normal renal function on conventional immunosuppressive therapy. This case, and a review of the literature, suggest that ABO blood group incompatibility need not be an absolute barrier to successful kidney transplantation. ABO incompatible kidney transplantation may be a potentially fruitful area for further research as the demand for donor organs continues to outstrip the supply.     

Increasing the supply of kidneys for transplantation

Kidney transplantation confers a survival advantage for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) when compared to dialysis and improves the quality of life in a cost-effective manner. Currently there are more than 60,000 patients on the U.S. waiting list for kidney transplantation. In 2004, 16,879 kidney transplants, including 880 simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplants, were performed in this country. Recent strategies for increasing the supply of kidneys hold promise, such as systematic programs designed to improve consent rates for deceased donor organ procurement. Efforts to increase donation after cardiac death (DCD) have been highly successful and now account for more than 5% of all deceased organ donors. Transplantation of kidneys from DCD donors yields 1-year graft and patient survival rates equivalent to kidneys from brain-dead donors. Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys from donors > or = 60 years of age (or donors age 50-59 years with certain comorbidities) confer a survival benefit for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients compared to remaining on dialysis on the waiting list. The number of live donor kidney transplants, both from biologically related and unrelated donors, is increasing. Paired live donor kidney transplants provide yet another transplantation opportunity for ESRD patients with willing but incompatible (by ABO or direct antibody) living donors.     

Desensitization With Plasmapheresis and Anti-Cd20 for ABO Incompatible Kidney Transplantation From Living Donor: Experience of a Single Center in Italy

Objective

Blood group incompatibility in kidney transplants from a living donor can be successfully overcome by using various desensitization protocols: intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis (PP), immunoadsorption, and double filtration PP.

Patients and Methods

From July 2010 to October 2013, we performed 10 ABO incompatible kidney transplantation (KT) procedures from a living donor. The desensitization protocol was based on rituximab and PP + cytomegalovirus immune globulin. All patients received induction with basiliximab, except 1 case treated with Thymoglobuline^® (ATG) for the simultaneous presence of donor-specific antibody. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were initiated at the time of desensitization and continued after the transplant.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 11.6 ± 10.4 months, all patients are alive with a functioning graft. The mean serum creatinine concentration at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year was 1.48 ± 0.29, 1.47 ± 0.18, 1.47 ± 0.27, and 1.5 ± 0.27 mg/dl. Three episodes of acute cellular rejection occurred in 2 patients. There was only 1 case of BK virus infection, treated with reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. The protocol biopsy specimens at 1, 3, and 6 months were C4d positive in the absence of acute rejection.

Conclusions

Desensitization with rituximab, PP, and anti–cytomegalovirus immune globulin allowed us to perform transplants from living donors to ABO incompatible recipients with excellent results and reduced costs.