Hepatitis c virus markers in infection by hepatitis c virus: In the era of directly acting antivirals

About 130-170 million people are infected with the hepatitis C virus(HCV) worldwide and more than 350000 people die each year of HCV-related liver diseases. The combination of pegylated interferon(Peg-IFN) and ribavirin(RBV) was recommended as the treatment of choice for chronic hepatitis C for nearly a decade. In 2011 the directly acting antivirals(DAA) HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors,telaprevir and boceprevir,were approved to treat HCV-genotype-1 infection,each in triple combination with Peg-IFN and RBV. These treatments allowed higher rates of SVR than the double Peg-IFN + RBV,but the low tolerability and high pill burden of these triple regimes were responsible for reduced adherence and early treatment discontinuation. The second and third wave DAAs introduced in 2013-2014 enhanced the efficacy and tolerability of anti-HCV treatment. Consequently,the traditional indicators for disease management and predictors of treatment response should be revised in light of these new therapeutic options. This review article will focus on the use of the markers of HCV infection and replication,of laboratory and instrumental data to define the stage of the disease and of predictors,if any,of response to therapy in the DAA era. The article is addressed particularly to physicians who have patients with hepatitis C in care in their everyday clinical practice.     

Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Children: Current Treatment and New Therapies

Viral hepatitis C is responsible for a large burden of disease worldwide. Treatment of hepatitis C infection is currently undergoing a revolution with the development of new direct acting antivirals that offer higher cure rates and fewer side effects than other medications currently available. Treatment options for children, although well-defined and evidence-based, are limited relative to adults as there are few trials regarding the use of these newly developed agents in children. With so much optimism in the development of novel therapeutic options for hepatitis C, it is timely to review and summarize the current standard of care treatment and indications for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in children. We provide here an overview of recent drug developments and their potential for use in children.     

Hepatitis C:New challenges in liver transplantation

In an era of great achievements in liver transplantation, hepatitis C viral infection(HCV) remains an unsolved problem. As a leading indication for liver transplantation in Western countries, HCV poses a significant burden both before and after transplantation. Post-transplant disease recurrence occurs in nearly all patients with detectable pretransplant viremia, compromising the lifesaving significance of transplantation. Many factors involving the donor, recipient and virus have beenevaluated throughout the literature, although few have been fully elucidated and implemented in actual clinical practice. Antiviral therapy has been recognized as a cornerstone of HCV infection control; however, experience and success are diminished following transplantation in a challenging cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis. Current therapeutic protocols surpass those used previously, both in sustained viral response and side-effect profile. In this article we review the most relevant and contemporary scientific evidence regarding hepatitis C infection and liver transplantation, with special attention dedicated to novel, more efficient and safer antiviral regimens.     

Hepatitis C genotype 4: The past,present, and future

Hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype(GT) 4 represents 12%-15%(15-18 million) of total global HCV infection. It is prevalent in Northern and Equatorial Africa and the Middle East, and is also present in some countries in Europe. GT-4(and subtype 4a in particular) dominates the HCV epidemic in Egypt. In underdeveloped countries, risk factors associated with HCV infection may be due to unsafe medical practices or other factors such as familial transmission, mother's HCV status, or illiteracy. HCV prevention and control programs should include health education, increased community awareness towards the disease, controlling infection distribution in healthcare centers, proper sterilization of medical and dental instruments, and ensuring safe supply of blood and blood-products. Response rates to a 48-wk combined pegylated-interferon(PEG-IFN) and ribavirin(RBV) treatment range from 40%-69%, and HCV-GT-4 has been considered better than GT-1 but worse than GT-2 and GT-3 in treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV. However, with the introduction of the HCV-GT-1 effective protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir in 2011, HCV-GT-4 became the "most difficult(GT) to treat". Recently, the direct-acting antivirals(DAAs) with pan- genotypic activities simeprevir, sofosbuvir, and daclatasvir have been recommended in triple regimens with PEG-IFN/RBV for the treatment of HCV-GT-4. An IFN-free regimen will be available for treatment of all genotypes of HCV in the near future. To date, several DAAs have been developed and are currently being evaluated in various combinations in clinical trials. As new regimens and new agents are being approved by the Food and Drug Administration, we can expect the guidelines for HCV treatment to be changed. The availability of shorter, simpler, and more tolerable treatment regimens can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with HCV infection. With such a large number of therapeutic agents available, we can end up with a range of choices that we can select from to treat patients.     

Increased Duration of Dual Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin Therapy for Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Post-liver Transplantation Increases Sustained Virologic Response: A Retrospective Review

Background/Aim:

In patients with advanced post-transplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence, antiviral treatment (AVT) with interferon and ribavirin is indicated to prevent graft failure. The aim of this study was to determine and report Canadian data with respect to the safety, efficacy, and spontaneous virologic response (SVR) predictors of AVT among transplanted patients with HCV recurrence.

Patients and Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients transplanted in London, Ontario and Edmonton, Alberta from 2002 to 2012 who were treated for HCV. Demographic, medical, and treatment information was collected and analyzed.

Results:

A total of 85 patients with HCV received pegylated interferon with ribavirin post-liver transplantation and 28 of the 65 patients (43%) with genotype 1 achieved SVR. Of the patients having genotype 1 HCV who achieved SVR, there was a significantly lower stage of fibrosis (1.37 ± 0.88 vs. 1.89 ± 0.96; P = 0.03), increased ribavirin dose (total daily dose 1057 ± 230 vs. 856 ± 399 mg; P = 0.02), increased rapid virologic response (RVR) (6/27 vs. 0/31; P = 0.05), increased early virologic response (EVR) (28/28 vs. 18/35; P = 0.006), and longer duration of therapy (54.7 ± 13.4 weeks vs. 40.2 ± 18.7; P = 0.001). A logistic regression model using gender, age, RVR, EVR, anemia, duration of therapy, viral load, years’ post-transplant, and type of organ (donation after cardiac death vs. donation after brain death) significantly predicted SVR (P < 0.001), with duration of therapy having a significant odds ratio of 1.078 (P = 0.007).

Conclusions:

This study identified factors that predict SVR in HCV-positive patients who received dual therapy post-transplantation. Extending therapy from 48 weeks to 72 weeks of dual therapy is associated with increased SVR rates. Future studies examining the role of extended therapy are needed to confirm these findings, since the current study is a retrospective one.     

Epidemiological Survey of Patients With Hemodialysis Complicated by Hepatitis C in Japan

Nowadays, interferon‐free direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) treatment is the standard of care for chronic hepatitis C patients. Some DAA regimens are highly effective and safe even for those with renal dysfunction/failure including those receiving HD. However, it remains unclear to what extent HD specialists gain knowledge about advances in anti‐hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. To clarify the current situation and identify problems in the treatment of HD patients with chronic hepatitis C, we performed a questionnaire survey at 36 HD facilities between June 2016 and September 2017. In a total of 3418 HD patients, 179 (5.2%) were positive for anti‐HCV antibody, and among these patients, 110/125 (88.0%) were positive for serum HCV RNA. Of the latter, only 42/110 (38.2%) patients received antiviral therapy. Moreover, HCV serotyping or genotyping was performed in 23/110 (20.9%) patients. In 26/49 (53.1%) of the remaining 68 untreated patients, “HD specialists do not know any HCV‐specific treatments” and “HD specialists have no opportunity to consult with a hepatologist” were the reasons cited for the lack of anti‐HCV treatment. This epidemiological study found that some HD patients with chronic hepatitis C had not yet received antiviral treatment despite the emergence of DAAs. To overcome such undesirable circumstances, medical cooperation between HD specialists and hepatologists should be required.     

Effect of treating chronic hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals on extrahepatic cutaneous manifestations

BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus(HCV) is a disease with a significant global impact, affecting approximately 2%-2.5% of the world's population. New direct-acting antivirals(DAAs) have been introduced over the past few years with great success in viral eradication. The association of chronic HCV infection with a wide spectrum of cutaneous manifestations has been widely reported in the literature.AIM To assess the effect of treating HCV with DAAs on the extrahepatic cutaneous manifestations of HCV.METHODS This prospective observational study included 1039 HCV positive Egyptian patients who were eligible to receive DAAs. A total of 30 patients were diagnosed with extrahepatic cutaneous manifestations and fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the study. Of these patients, 6 had classic lichen planus, 8 were diagnosed with psoriasis vulgaris and 16 had pruritus. All patients received DAAs from October 2018 to July 2019 in the form of a three-month course of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir combination. Patients with lichen planus or psoriasis were dermoscopically evaluated before treatment and 6 mo after treatment, while patients with hepatic pruritus were assessed using the 12-Item Pruritus Severity Scale over the same period.RESULTS All patients with psoriasis showed significant improvement in all psoriatic plaques, and all patients with hepatic pruritus scored 0 on the 12-Item Pruritus Severity Scale indicating total improvement of pruritus. In addition, four of sixpatients with lichen planus showed complete improvement.CONCLUSION Treatment of HCV with DAAs was significantly effective in improving virusrelated extrahepatic cutaneous manifestations.     

Hepatitis C virus:A global view

Hepatitis C virus(HCV) is a global challenge; 130-175 million are chronically infected. Over 350000 die each year from HCV. Chronic HCV is the primary cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), and end-stage liver disease. Management of chronic HCV is aimed at preventing cirrhosis, reducing the risk of HCC, and treating extra hepatic complications. New treatments for chronic HCV has been devoted based on direct-acting antivirals, as pegylated interferon(peginterferon) is responsible for many side effects and limits treatment access. Sofosbuvir is the first compound to enter the market with Peginterferon-free combination regimens.     

丙型肝炎直接抗病毒治疗研究进展

正目前,我国针对慢性丙型肝炎(chronic hepatitis C,CHC)的标准治疗方案(standard of care,SOC)仍然是聚乙二醇干扰素(pegylated interferon,PEGIFN)-α联合利巴韦林(ribavirin,RBV),简称PR治疗。但是近年来,针对HCV生活周期中病毒蛋白靶向特异性治疗的许多小分子化合物研究进展非常迅速,这些药物被统一命名为直接作用抗病毒药物     

Management of hepatitis C patients with decompensated liver disease

Little is known about the tolerance and effectiveness of novel oral direct acting antivirals (DAA) in hepatitis C patients with decompensated cirrhosis. To examine the studies relevant to the treatment of hepatitis C virus(HCV)-related decompensated liver disease, we performed computer–based searches for English articles between 1947 and August 2015. Fourteen articles including HCV patients with decompensated cirrhosis were reviewed. The combinations of ledipasvir(LDV)/sofosbuvir(SOF)/ribavirin(RBV) for 12 weeks, or daclatasvir/SOF/RBV for 12 weeks are safe and effective for HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection, and daclatasvir/SOF/RBV for 12 weeks or SOF/RBV for 24 weeks might be effective and safe for HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection. In conclusion, current evidence supports the use of all oral DAA regimens in HCV patients with decompensated cirrhosis.     

Mechanisms of Hepatitis C Viral Resistance to Direct Acting Antivirals

There has been a remarkable transformation in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in recent years with the development of direct acting antiviral agents targeting virus encoded proteins important for viral replication including NS3/4A, NS5A and NS5B. These agents have shown high sustained viral response (SVR) rates of more than 90% in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials; however, this is slightly lower in real-life cohorts. Hepatitis C virus resistant variants are seen in most patients who do not achieve SVR due to selection and outgrowth of resistant hepatitis C virus variants within a given host. These resistance associated mutations depend on the class of direct-acting antiviral drugs used and also vary between hepatitis C virus genotypes and subtypes. The understanding of these mutations has a clear clinical implication in terms of choice and combination of drugs used. In this review, we describe mechanism of action of currently available drugs and summarize clinically relevant resistance data.     

Is neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin useful in hepatitis C virus infection?

AIM: To evaluate neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin(NGAL) in patients infected by hepatitis C virus(HCV) before and during treatment with directly acting antivirals(DAAs).METHODS: NGAL was measured in a group of patients with chronic HCV infection ranked, at baseline, by age, gender, anti-hypertensive therapy, HCV viral load, liver fibrosis stage and, either at baseline or after 1 year, estimated glomerular filtration rate(e GFR). Then, NGAL and e GFR evolutions were monitored in a subgroup of patients who started antiviral therapy with DAAs. Differences of median NGAL levels were evaluated through Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for nonparametric data. Differences in dichotomous variables were evaluated through χ~2 test. At baseline, a univariate regression analysis was conducted to verify if NGAL values correlated with other quantitative variables [age, fibrosis four(FIB-4), AST to platelet ratio index(APRI), and e GFR]. RESULTS: Overall, 48 patients were enrolled, 8 of them starting HCV treatment. At baseline, statistically significant differences were found in median NGAL values only between patients with e GFR 60 mL/min vs patients with e GFR ≥ 90 mL/min. Differences in NGAL were not significant among patients ranked by HCV viral load, FIB-4 score and APRI, when patients with NGAL 118.11 ng/d L were compared with those of NGAL ≤ 118.11 ng/d L, not statistically significant differences were present for age, gender, chronic kidney disease classification and liver fibrosis(P 0.05). Linear correlation was found between NGAL and both age(P = 0.0475) and e GFR(P = 0.0282) values. Not statistically significant predictions of NGAL at baseline were demonstrated for e GFR evolution 1 year later. Interestingly, in the 8 patients treated with DAAs, median NGAL significantly increased at week 12 compared to baseline(P = 0.0239).CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that NGAL should be further evaluated as an adjunct marker of kidney function in these patients.     

Glecaprevir + pibrentasvir (ABT493 + ABT-530) for the treatment of Hepatitis C

Introduction: Glecaprevir (formerly ABT-493, pangenotypic NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and pibrentasvir (formerly ABT-530, pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor) are second generation direct acting antivirals (DAA) for the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C (HCV). It is a fixed dose ribavirin (RBV)-free regimen with activity against genotypes (GT) 1–6. In vitro the two antivirals have synergistic activity with a high barrier to resistance and potent activity against common polymorphisms. It is once daily oral dosing with minimal absorption, primary biliary excretion, and negligible renal excretion, making it safe for patients with renal impairment. This regimen is being reviewed because it is the first pangenotypic regimen suitable for those with renal impairment and prior DAA failure.

Areas covered: The key phase 2 and 3 trials which investigated the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir are reviewed by methodology, primary end point, baseline demographic data, response rates, and adverse events. Literature search methodology involved reviewing key abstracts presented at the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and European Association for the Study of Liver.

Expert commentary: The advantages and limitations of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir will be reviewed in comparison to its competitor drug on the market.     

Impact of all oral anti-hepatitis C virus therapy: A meta-analysis

AIM:To investigate the efficacy,safety,and cost of treatment of direct acting antivirals(DAAs) with and without peg interferon alfa2a(P),and/or ribavirin(R) in treating hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype 1 patients.METHODS:MEDLINE was searched for randomized controlled trials(RCT) using DAAs for HCV treatment.Phase 1 trials and studies with investigational drugs on genotype 2 or 3,and on human immunodeficiency virus patients were excluded.Data were pooled for sustained virologic response(SVR),serious adverse effects,and drug discontinuation rate on various treatment arms in trials:P + R;1st generation DAA(telaprevir or boceprevir) + P + R;2nd generation DAA(sofosbuvir or simeprevir) + P + R;2nd generation DAA + R;two 2nd generation DAA + R;and two 2nd gen DAA.Data were analyzed separately for each arm for treatment naive and non-responders(NR) to previous treatment.The cost of treatment with each regimen for achieving one SVR was also compared.RESULTS:Twenty three RCTs(n = 9354,62% male,11% cirrhosis) were analyzed.All oral(P free) regimens with combination of 2 DAA achieved SVR above 95%.The cost of treatment to achieve an SVR with DAA based regimens was lower for NR compared to P+R regimen.However,the cost per SVR remained higher for treatment naive patients.CONCLUSION:Second generation and emerging DAAs are promising agents in HCV treatment,with a very high level of safety and efficacy.An important drawback is their high cost.However,the present meta-analysis shows that the cost per SVR for non responders(but not for naive patients) was lower compared to P + R.This finding together with the superior safety profile and better compliance makes these drugs highly attractive.It is possible that further reduction in treatment duration may make them even more cost effective.     

Hepatitis C Treatment in Patients With Porphyria Cutanea Tarda

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a common susceptibility factor for porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT). Experience on HCV treatment in patients with PCT is limited. Recently, HCV treatment has improved with direct-acting antivirals (DAA). We review our experience on HCV treatment in patients with PCT with older and newer regimens.

Hepatitis B Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experiences and Review the Literature

Background

Despite the advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, liver transplantation (LT) remains the only hope for many patients with end-stage liver diseases resulting from HBV.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of HBV recurrence in cases that had undergone LT due to the HBV related liver cirrhosis.

Patients and Methods

Forty-nine patients who underwent LT due to HBV related cirrhosis since 2001 to 2009 in Shiraz Organ Transplantation Center were enrolled in the present study. They were asked to complete the planned questionnaire and also to sign the informed consent in order to take part in this study. Post-transplant prophylaxis protocol against HBV recurrence was based on a hundred milligrams of lamivudine daily plus intramuscular injections of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) with appropriate dosage to keep anti-HBs antibody titer above 300 IU/L and 100 IU/L in the first six months and afterwards, respectively. Blood samples were obtained and checked for HBsAg, HBeAg, and the titers of Anti -HBsAb as well as Anti- HBeAb with ELISA. A quantitative HBV DNA assay was also done on all samples (GENE-RAD® Real-time PCR).

Results

There were 91.8% males and 8.2% females enrolled in the study. The duration of post-transplant prophylaxis ranged from 3 months to 8 years (mean 18.9 ± 19.3 months). HBsAg and HBeAg were positive in 24.5% and 2% of cases, respectively. Real-time PCR for HBV DNA were zero copies/mL in 91.8% of patients, none of which represented a positive value for HBV recurrence (Positive > 10,000 copies/mL). The mean Anti-HBs Ab titer was 231.7 ± 135.9 IU/L; it was above 100 IU/L in 71.4% of patients. Thirty-seven (75.5%) of the patients were taking tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil, 6 (12.2%) were on cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil, and 6 (12.2%) were taking sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil. HBsAg was detectable in seven patients taking tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (18.9%), in four patients taking cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil (66.7%), and in one patient among the six who were taking sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (16.7%). There was no significant statistical correlation between the presence of a positive value for HBsAg and the immunosuppression regimen or Anti HBsAb titer (P ˃ 0.05). Presence of a positive value for HBsAg was not predictive of a positive HBV DNA or its level in blood (P ˃ 0.05).

Conclusions

Post-transplant HBV prophylaxis with lamivudine and intramuscular HBIG with appropriate dosage to keep anti-HBs antibody titer above 300 IU/L in the first six months and above 100 IU/L afterwards is effective for prevention of HBV recurrence after LT.