Clinical parameters associated with low bacteremia risk in 1100 pediatric oncology patients with fever and neutropenia

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, children with malignant disease who present with fever and neutropenia are hospitalized for parenteral antibiotics. More recently, outpatient strategies have been proposed for lower risk cohorts of such patients. The authors sought to identify clinical and laboratory parameters that are associated with a low risk of bacteremia in children with malignant disease who presented with febrile neutropenia. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort of children with malignant disease and fever with neutropenia was established in three pediatric oncology centers over a 5-year period. A total of 1171 episodes of febrile neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 500 cells per mm(3)) were identified in children with malignant disease age > 1 year. The endpoints examined were 1) bacteremia and 2) intensive care unit admission or death related to bacteremia. The odds ratio was used to determine which of the following admission parameters and cut-off values were associated with the lowest risk for bacteremia: ANC, absolute phagocyte count (APC), absolute monocyte count (AMC), platelet count, and admission temperature. RESULTS: A total of 189 episodes of bacteremia were identified among the 1171 episodes of febrile neutropenia (14% bacteremia). Only 11 of 1171 episodes (0.9%) resulted in intensive care unit admission, and 3 of these patients died. All 11 patients had an AMC < 30 cells per mm(3). The lowest frequency of bacteremia (6.1%) occurred in the children with an admission AMC of > or = 155 cells per mm(3). None of the patients identified as low risk by AMC required an intensive care unit admission or died. No level of ANC, APC, temperature, or platelet count was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk for bacteremia in the patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse outcomes due to bacteremia are infrequent in pediatric oncology patients who present with fever and neutropenia are treated with parental antibiotics. Patients with fever and neutropenia and an AMC value of > or = 155 cells per mm(3) have the lowest risk for bacteremia and may be potential candidates for outpatient management.     

Rifampin does not improve the efficacy of quinolone antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients: results of a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of rifampin to a quinolone-based antibacterial prophylactic regimen in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) decreases the incidence of neutropenia and fever, Gram-positive bacteremia, and infection-related morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors undergoing HDC with PBSCT were randomized to receive prophylactic antibiotics with either ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally every 8 hours or the same ciprofloxacin regimen with rifampin 300 mg orally every 12 hours. Prophylaxis was started 48 hours before stem-cell reinfusion. Patients were monitored to document the occurrence of neutropenia and fever, incidence and cause of bacterial infection, time to onset and duration of fever, requirement for intravenous antimicrobials, and length of hospital admission. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were randomized to receive ciprofloxacin and 65 to receive ciprofloxacin plus rifampin, and from these groups, 62 and 61 were assessable, respectively. The proportion of patients who developed neutropenia and fever was 87% in the group treated with ciprofloxacin and 78% in the group treated with ciprofloxacin and rifampin (P =.25). Although there was a trend toward a reduction in the overall incidence of bacteremia (12 v 4 patients), and Gram-positive bacteremia (8 v 2 patients) with the addition of rifampin, none of these comparisons was statistically significant (P =.05 and P =.09, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this study, which demonstrate that rifampin does not improve ciprofloxacin antibacterial prophylaxis in cancer patients undergoing HDC with PBSCT support but that it does increase the occurrence of undesirable side effects, do not support the routine use of rifampin in this setting.     

Quinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients - efficacy versus resistance

To assess the efficacy of quinolones in the prophylaxis of infections in neutropenic patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia, and to evaluate the emergence of quinolone resistance in two University Hospitals in Brazil, we retrospectively compared 101 consecutive episodes of neutropenia managed with quinolone prophylaxis between 1989 and November 1993, and 26 previous episodes without prophylaxis, and reviewed the results of in vitro sensitivity of Gram-negative strains to quinolones in the same period. Prophylaxis with quinolones resulted in less episodes of bacteremias (21% vs. 69%, p=10(-7)), including Gram-negative bacteremias (6% vs. 38%, p=10(-5)), with no statistically significant difference in the death rate (18% vs. 31%, p=0.14, 95% confidence interval -6-32). The resistance of Gramnegative strains to quinolones rose from 7% to 18% between 1990 and 1993 (p=10(-5)). The resistance against ceftazidime and amikacin, the agents used in the empirical antibiotic therapy, increased in the same proportion as the quinolones. Given the limited benefit of quinolones as prophylaxis and the increasing number of quinolone-resistant Gram-negative strains observed in our hospitals, the use of quinolones as prophylaxis must be seriously questioned. A stricter control of the use of quinolones in these hospitals might decrease resistance.     

Bacterial Infection Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With Bortezomib-based Induction Therapy: Real-World Experience in an Asian Cancer Center

BackgroundThe treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) has progressed significantly, and over the past decade, bortezomib-based induction therapy has been a standard of care. However, the practice of antibacterial prophylaxis during induction therapy has been diverse. The aim of our study is to evaluate the proportion of patients with febrile episodes and bacteremia among patients with MM, during the first 12 weeks of bortezomib-based induction therapy, without routine fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, but with routine Pneumocystis Carinii prophylaxis (mostly with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), in a region with high fluoroquinolone resistance rate. Of note, these patients have direct access to health care facilities and timely supportive care.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated newly diagnosed MM patients from 2014 to 2018 receiving bortezomib-based induction therapy for the proportion of patients who had febrile episodes and bacteremia in the first 12 weeks of bortezomib-based induction therapy. We also evaluated if there were factors associated with increased febrile episodes including age, absolute neutrophil count, creatinine clearance, M-band level at diagnosis, nadir platelet count, International Staging System, and Revised International Staging System.ResultsOf the 108 evaluable patients, there were a total of 25 (23.1%) patients who had febrile episodes, and 1 (0.9%) patient who had bacteremia during the first 12 weeks of bortezomib-based induction therapy. All patients recovered well. No deaths were seen. Febrile episodes were associated with lower absolute neutrophil count (P = .036), renal impairment (P = .013), and ISS stage (P = .026).ConclusionThe proportion of patients with significant bacterial infection during the first 12 weeks of bortezomib-based induction therapy without routine fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, but with routine Pneumocystis Carinii prophylaxis (mostly with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), is low in a population with adequate access to health care facilities and timely supportive care.     

Intensified prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with ofloxacin plus rifampin during severe short-duration neutropenia in patients with lymphoma.

To analyse the impact of intensified prophylaxis with ofloxacin plus rifampin (O+R) in neutropenic patients we used this combination in 40 consecutive cycles of ifosfamide, cytarabine, prednisolone and etoposide (IAPVP-16). This salvage chemotherapy regimen for lymphoma usually produces four to six days of severe neutropenia without significant extrahematologic toxicities. We compared the infectious morbidity during neutropenia under O+R with 58 consecutives cycles using either norfloxacin or no prophylaxis (control group). Fifty-three percent of control group patients and 20% of the O+R group developed febrile neutropenia that required hospital admission (p<0.001, 95% CI for the difference between both proportions of 16% to 51%). Bacteremia was documented in two patients in the O+R group and six in the control group (p=0.08). Gram-positive cocci (GPC) accounted for all six bacteremias in the control group, while both cases in O+R group were due to a quinolone-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB) (p<0.01 for GPC). Five patients (13%) who received O+R and 23 (40%) in control group developed fever of unknown origin, p<0.001, while the total duration of hospitalization due to febril neutropenia was 42 days and 158 days, respectively (p<0.001). In conclusion, intensified prophylaxis with O+R appears to reduce the rate of febrile neutropenia and GPC bacteremia in patients with short and severe neutropenia, which translates into a reduction in the need for hospitalization.     

Outcomes of High Risk Patients with Febrile Neutropenia at a Tertiary Care Center

Fever during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Mortality depends on the duration and degree of neutropenia, bacteremia, sepsis, performance status, comorbidities and other parameters. The highest mortality rates in cancer patients hospitalized with febrile neutropenia (FN) are observed in those with documented infection. The objectives of the study were to present available tools for risk assessment, to review pathogens causing infections in adult FN patients and to assess outcomes. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted on adult culture positive FN patients admitted to the Hematology/Oncology service at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan from 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2012. High-risk criteria were defined as profound neutropenia, short latency from a previous chemotherapy cycle, sepsis or clinically documented infection at presentation, severe co-morbidity and a performance status greater than or equal to 3. All types of organisms in blood culture and the outcomes of the patients were recorded on Proforma. Results: A total of 156 patients with culture-positive febrile neutropenia were identified during the study period. The mean age was 47 years with a slight male predominance of 54%. One hundred and sixteen patients fulfilled the criteria for the high risk group. Fifty two percent had a single high risk factor and 40 % had two. All patients harbored either single or multiple bacterial organisms including gram positive, gram negative or both types. Some 34% of patients had gram positive bacteremia, 57 % had gram negative and 9 % were infected with both. Among 73 gram positive cultures 44 % were Staphylococcus species and among 123 gram negative cultures 43 % were E. coli. One hundred and fifteen patients recovered uneventfully and could be discharged. Thirty two patients in the high risk and 9 in the low risk groups deceased with an overall mortality of 26 %. The mean hospital stays of patients with solid tumors and hematological malignancies were 7.58 and 15.0 days, respectively. Mortality was higher in the latter group, and also in high risk patients with both gram positive and negative bacteremia. Conclusion: We emphasize the importance of risk stratification and continuous surveillance of the spectrum of locally prevalent pathogens and their susceptibility patterns for formulation of therapeutic regimens for febrile neutropenic patients.     

Antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients: new evidence, practical decisions

New evidence shows that antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients reduces mortality, febrile episodes, and bacterial infections. For patients with acute leukemia or those who undergo bone marrow transplantation, prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones diminished the risk of death from any cause by 33% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2-54%). Thus, 55 patients who have acute leukemia or who undergo bone marrow transplantation must receive prophylaxis to prevent 1 death. In 4 studies that included patients with solid tumors or lymphoma, prophylaxis reduced the rate of death during the first month (relative risk, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.97), and 82 patients had to receive prophylaxis to prevent 1 death. The main argument brought against prophylaxis is the induction of resistance. Patients who received prophylaxis did not experience more infections caused by resistant strains than patients in the control group. The recent GIMEMA study was conducted in a population with a nearly 50% resistance to fluoroquinolones in all pathogens and 20% resistance in gram-negative isolates, thus indicating that prophylaxis should be offered in settings with similar or less resistance. Prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones was efficacious in reducing infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Patients who are treated for acute leukemia should be offered prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin. Prophylaxis to cover the expected period of neutropenia may be considered for the first cycle of treatment in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma who regularly receive regimens that cause severe neutropenia. Excessive local levels of resistance to fluoroquinolones or high local incidence of infections caused by Clostridium difficile and related to fluoroquinolones should prompt a reconsideration of this policy.     

A study of bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients at a tertiary-care hospital with special reference to anaerobes

Patients with hematological malignancies who are receiving chemotherapy suffer prolonged periods of neutropenia, which leads to a greater risk of infection and mortality. A prospective study was conduced to determine the incidence of bacteremia in patients of hematological malignancies over a 2-yr period. A total of 119 episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred among 96 consecutive patients, of which 35 episodes were associated with bacteremia. Forty-four percent of the isolated bacteria were Gram-positive aerobes and 46% were Gram-negative aerobes. Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., and Escherichia coli were the most common isolates. Gram-negative bacteremia was associated with a higher mortality. Anaerobes accounted for 4.4% of all isolates. The episodes of anaerobic bacteremia were polymicrobial and had a fatal outcome. A high incidence of antimicrobial resistance among aerobic and anaerobic bacteria was also recorded. Compared to previous years, a shift from a predominating Gram-negative to a Gram-positive etiology was noted. The initial empiric antibiotic regimens should be based on a local knowledge of the most common causative microorganisms, their sensitivity pattern, and the outcome of bacteremia.     

Emesis predicts bacteremia in immunocompromised children with central venous catheters and fever

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to determine whether vomiting at presentation of a febrile illness in immunocompromised children with central venous catheters (CVCs) predicts bacteremia.

METHODS:

A chart review was conducted of children who were admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of cancer or aplastic anemia, fever, and a CVC. Data were collected on the presence or absence of vomiting, catheter type, presence or absence of severe neutropenia, C‐reactive protein (Crp) value, and culture results.

RESULTS:

There were 143 admissions for fever among 48 children. Among 35 admissions with emesis, 19 included bacteremia; whereas, among 107 admissions without emesis, 19 included bacteremia (P < .001). There was a 5‐fold greater risk of bacteremia in children with children without vomiting (odds ratio, 5.50; 95% confidence interval, 2.20‐13.67). Gram‐negative organisms were more likely to be associated with vomiting than Gram‐positive organisms (P = .008). Children with severe neutropenia did not have a significantly higher rate of bacteremia than children who had neutrophil counts >500 cells/mm³. Other factors that were associated with higher rates of bacteremia were underlying diagnosis and catheter type.

CONCLUSIONS:

Immunocompromised children with a CVC and a fever who presented with vomiting were more likely to have bacteremia than similar children who presented without vomiting. Gram‐negative organisms were more likely to be associated with emesis than Gram‐positive organisms. The absence of severe neutropenia was not associated with a decreased likelihood of bacteremia. These findings may be useful in identifying children who are at high risk for bacteremia and in determining initial, empiric therapy. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Serum levels of IL-1 beta, sIL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-alpha in febrile children with cancer and neutropenia

Serum levels of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta), soluble interleukin 2 receptors (sIL-2R), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were measured to predict some characteristics of febrile episodes in children with cancer and neutropenia. Forty-eight episodes of febrile neutropenia were determined in 23 pediatric cancer patients, including 35 febrile episodes without identifiable source, 7 episodes of bacteremia due to Gram-negative organisms and 4 due to Gram-positive organisms, and 2 fungal infections. Interleukin-6, sIL-2R, and IL-8 levels were significantly higher at the beginning of the febrile episodes than those of controls (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). Interleukin-6, slL-2R, and IL-8 levels were higher in patients with bacteremia due to Gram-negative organisms than in those with Gram-positive ones (p = 0.042, p = 0.006, and p = 0.023, respectively). TNF-alpha and IL-1beta levels were similar in febrile episodes and controls (p > 0.05). In conclusion, sIL-2R, IL-6, and IL-8 levels may be helpful in the prediction of infection in febrile cancer patients with neutropenia and measurements of IL-1beta and TNF-alpha were not useful for identifying the presence and the type of infection in febrile neutropenic episodes in children.     

Bacteremia caused by Achromobacter and Alcaligenes species in 46 patients with cancer (1989-2003)

BACKGROUND: Achromobacter and Alcaligenes are emerging infectious gram-negative bacterial species that can affect immunosuppressed patients. The authors sought to determine the incidence and characteristics of bloodstream infections caused by these organisms in patients with underlying malignancies. METHODS: All consecutive episodes of hematogenous Achromobacter and Alcaligenes infections recorded from December 26, 1989, to July 27, 2003, were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: Fifty-two episodes occurred in 46 patients; 31 patients (67%) had hematologic malignancies, and 24 (52%) experienced neutropenia (< 500 cells/microL). Diabetes mellitus was present in 12 patients (26%), and high-dose corticosteroids were administered to 12 patients (26%). Seventeen of the 52 infectious episodes (33%) were nosocomial in origin, and 10 patients (22%) had sepsis syndrome. Achromobacter xylosoxidans was the most common cause of infection (47 of 52 episodes [94%]), followed by Ach. denitrificans (2 of 52 episodes [4%]) and Alcaligenes faecalis (1 of 52 episodes [2%]). Twenty-seven episodes (52%) were polymicrobial, and 3 patients (7%) had concurrent fungemia. Infected intravascular catheters were present in 13 of 52 cases (25%), pneumonia was encountered in 6 of 52 cases (12%), and urinary tract infections were present in 5 of 52 cases (10%). Most isolates exhibited in vitro susceptibility to carbapenems, antipseudomonal penicillins, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Resistance to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, aminoglycosides, and monobactam was common. Seven deaths (15%) were attributable to Achromobacter species. Incidence rates for sepsis syndrome, multiorgan dysfunction (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score > 16), and use of mechanical ventilation and pressor support were significantly higher in patients who died (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that sepsis syndrome and high APACHE II scores were predictors of increased 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Most infections caused by this group of nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria were attributable to Ach. xylosoxidans, and only one-third were acquired during hospitalization. The presence of sepsis syndrome has evolved as an independent predictor of poor outcome in patients with high-risk malignancies accompanied by Achromobacter bloodstream infections.     

Reappraisal with meta-analysis of the addition of Gram-positive prophylaxis to fluoroquinolone in neutropenic patients.

PURPOSE: Past reports and meta-analyses indicate that fluoroquinolones are highly effective in preventing Gram-negative infections in neutropenic cancer patients, but offer inadequate coverage for Gram-positive infections. We evaluated by meta-analysis the efficacy of the addition of antimicrobial agents with enhanced Gram-positive activity to prophylaxis with quinolones.Materials and METHODS: Randomized trials comparing fluoroquinolones alone (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, or norfloxacin) with fluoroquinolone in combination with Gram-positive prophylaxis (rifampin, vancomycin, amoxicillin, roxithromycin, or penicillin) were retrieved. We pooled relative risks (RRs) using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Nine trials (1,202 patients) published between 1993 and 2000 meet inclusion criteria. Compared with fluoroquinolone alone, Gram-positive prophylaxis reduced total bacteremic episodes (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.88), streptococcal infections (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.44 to 3.37), coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.04), and rate of febrile patients (RR 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.16). Occurrence of clinically documented infections, unexplained fever, and infectious mortality was similar in the two groups. The addition of Gram-positive prophylaxis, however, significantly increased side effects (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.76). Rifampin use resulted in a higher incidence of undesirable effects. CONCLUSION: Considering the lack of cut-clear benefit on some parameters of morbidity and mortality, routine use of Gram-positive prophylaxis is not advisable. This strategy, however, should be particularly valuable in subgroups of patients at high risk of streptococcal infection (eg, those with severe and prolonged neutropenia or mucositis, and those receiving cytarabine). Problems of tolerability and the potential for the emergence of resistant microorganisms should be considered when prescribing prophylaxis with enhanced Gram-positive activity to neutropenic patients.     

Bacteremia and Fungemia in Pediatric Versus Adult Cancer Patients after Chemotherapy: Comparison of Etiology,Risk Factors and Outcome

Abstract

One hundred and eighteen (118) episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in children with cancer were compared to 401 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults with cancer to assess differences in etiology, risk factors and outcome. A retrospective univariate analysis was performed of all episodes of bacteremia in national pediatric and adult cancer institutions appearing in 1990- 1996. A total of 519 episodes of bacteremia were assessed and compared. Both cancer centers differed in prophylactic antibiotic policies. About 50% of adults but less than 5% of children received quinolone prophylaxis during neutropenia, even though the empiric antibiotic therapeutic strategy was similar.

There were differences in etiology between the groups: staphylococci and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were more frequently observed in children (P<0.01), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. in adults (P<0.05). Gram-positive bacteremia was surprisingly more commonly observed in adults (65.7% vs 33.3%, P<0.01). Mixed polymicrobial bacteremia occurred more commonly in adults (31.8% vs 7.6%, P<0.001) than in children. Analysis of risk factors did not observe differences in risk factors except for underlying disease (acute leukemia was more frequently observed in children - 48.3% vs adults 33.7%, P<0.05 and prophylaxis: (prior prophylaxis with quinolones was more common in adults (47.5%) than in children (2.5%) P<0.0001). Overall and attributable mortality in pediatric bacteremia was significantly lower than in adults (P<0.03).     

Oral ciprofloxacin in the management of children with cancer with lower risk febrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND: Recent reports and a previous randomized trial conducted at the authors' institution suggested that a lower risk subset of children with febrile neutropenia under chemotherapy might benefit of an oral antibiotic outpatient approach. METHODS: The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of oral ciprofloxacin in the treatment of lower risk febrile neutropenia (LRFN) in children treated for malignant diseases. From November 1998 to December 1999, 93 episodes of LRFN in 87 children (median age, 5.5 years; range, 0.9-15.8 years) were included in a prospective randomized controlled single institution trial. Inclusion criteria included fever (> 38 degrees C), severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, < 500/mm(3)), and lower risk features (e.g., absence of severe comorbidity factors, good clinical condition, negative blood cultures, control of local infection, prediction of a period of neutropenia less than 10 days after admission, and compliant parents). After 24 hours of a single intravenous ceftriaxone (100 mg/kg) plus amikacin (15 mg/kg) and completed risk assessment workup, patients were discharged and randomly allocated to two groups. Group A (48 episodes) received ciprofloxacin 20 mg/kg/day orally (p.o.) every 12 hours for 6 days. Group B (45 episodes) received intravenous ceftriaxone plus amikacin for 2 days more followed by cefixime (8 mg/kg/day p.o.) every 24 hours for 4 additional days. Failure was defined as the need of a second hospitalization during the same episode. RESULTS: Most of the patients (59% in Group A and 52% in Group B) were treated for malignant solid tumors. Fifteen (31%) children in Group A and 15 (33%) in Group B presented with fever of unknown origin (P value was not significant). No significant differences were found in sites of initial infection between both groups. Overall results in this study were excellent. Only one patient with respiratory failure was detected in Group B, who did well with secondary treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In febrile neutropenic children after anticancer therapy and lower risk features, oral ciprofloxacin for 6 days after 24 hours of intravenous ceftraxione plus amikacin appears to be as efficacious as intravenous ceftriaxone plus amikacin for 2 days more followed by cefixime for 4 additional days. These results contribute to strengthen the concept of LRFN.     

Feasibility of oral ciprofloxacin for the outpatient management of febrile neutropenia in selected children with cancer

BACKGROUND: Children with cancer who develop an episode of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia usually are admitted to the hospital for intravenous empiric antibiotic therapy. In the current study, the authors examined the use of ciprofloxacin as outpatient management in selected patients with fever during an episode of neutropenia. METHODS: Febrile neutropenic patients with a diagnosis of cancer were eligible for outpatient management with oral ciprofloxacin if they appeared well and demonstrated the following characteristics: age 1-21 years, malignancy in remission, absolute phagocyte count > 100/mm(3), > 7 days since the initiation of the last course of chemotherapy, and reliable parents. Eligible children received a single dose of ceftazidime and were observed for 2-23 hours. Patients were discharged receiving oral ciprofloxacin (20/mg/kg/day divided in 2 doses) until the patient was afebrile for 24 hours, had sterile blood cultures, and had evidence of bone marrow recovery. Patients were admitted if they appeared toxic, had positive blood cultures, or were febrile for >/= 5 days. RESULTS: Forty-five evaluable episodes occurred in 32 children. Forty of the 45 patients (89%) were treated successfully in the outpatient setting. The 95% lower confidence bound on the proportion of successful outcomes was 70%. Five children required hospitalization: 2 due to noncompliance, 1 to receive intravenous acyclovir for herpes zoster, and 2 (4%) whose blood cultures were positive for Streptococcus viridans and S. pneumoniae. All had uncomplicated hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that very carefully selected, low risk patients with febrile neutropenia may be treated successfully without hospitalization using oral ciprofloxacin. Additional research is required to refine further the optimal criteria for the selection of appropriate patients for outpatient management.     

Pegfilgrastim +/- ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study.

BACKGROUND: TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) is associated with high incidences of grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN). This analysis compared the efficacies of four regimens for primary prophylaxis of FN and related toxic effects in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant TAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage T2-T4 primary breast cancer were scheduled to receive 6-8 cycles of TAC. Primary prophylaxis was: ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily on days 5-14 (n = 253 patients; 1478 cycles), daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day or lenograstim 150 microg/m(2)/day) on days 5-10 (n = 377; 2400 cycles), pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2 (n = 305; 1930 cycles), or pegfilgrastim plus ciprofloxacin (n = 321; 1890 cycles). RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim with/without ciprofloxacin was significantly more effective than daily G-CSF or ciprofloxacin in preventing FN (5% and 7% versus 18% and 22% of patients; all P < 0.001), grade 4 neutropenia, and leukopenia. Pegfilgrastim plus ciprofloxacin completely prevented first cycle FN (P < 0.01 versus pegfilgrastim alone) and fatal neutropenic events. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin alone, or daily G-CSF from day 5-10 (as in common practice), provided suboptimal protection against FN and related toxic effects in patients receiving TAC. Pegfilgrastim was significantly more effective in this setting, especially if given with ciprofloxacin.     

Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known. We aimed to compare the effect of adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation on survival in patients with completely resected NSCLC. METHODS: 840 patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC from 101 centres in 14 countries were randomly assigned to observation (n=433) or to 30 mg/m(2) vinorelbine plus 100 mg/m(2) cisplatin (n=407). Postoperative radiotherapy was not mandatory and was undertaken according to every centre's policy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN95053737. FINDINGS: 367 patients in the chemotherapy group and 431 in the control group received their assigned treatment. 301 (36%) patients had stage IB disease, 203 (24%) had stage II disease, and 325 (39%) had stage IIIA disease. Tolerance to chemotherapy mainly included neutropenia in 335 (92%) patients and febrile neutropenia in 34 (9%); seven (2%) toxic deaths were also recorded. Compliance was greater with cisplatin than with vinorelbine (median dose intensity 89% [range 17-108] vs 59% [17-100]). After a median follow-up of 76 months (range 43-116), median survival was 65.7 months (95% CI 47.9-88.5) in the chemotherapy group and 43.7 (35.7-52.3) months in the observation group. Adjusted risk for death was significantly reduced in patients assigned chemotherapy compared with controls (hazard ratio 0.80 [95% CI 0.66-0.96]; p=0.017). Overall survival at 5 years with chemotherapy improved by 8.6%, which was maintained at 7 years (8.4%). INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin extends survival in patients with completely resected NSCLC, better defining indication of adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Decreased incidence of febrile episodes with antibiotic prophylaxis in the treatment of decitabine for myelodysplastic syndrome

We analyzed the role of antibiotic prophylaxis during decitabine treatment for MDS. The primary endpoint was the incidence of febrile episodes. The total number of decitabine cycles given to 28 patients was 131, and febrile episodes occurred in 15 cycles (11.5%). Antibiotic prophylaxis was orally administered in 95 cycles (72.5%). Febrile episodes were significantly less frequent among patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis (7.4%) than in those without prophylaxis (22.2%) (P = 0.017). In conclusion, antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the incidence of febrile episodes in patients who received decitabine treatment for MDS, especially at earlier cycles and in the presence of severe cytopenia.     

"Low-risk" prediction rule for pediatric oncology patients presenting with fever and neutropenia.

PURPOSE: To prospectively derive and validate a clinical prediction rule to allow a more tailored approach to the management of pediatric oncology outpatients presenting with fever and neutropenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical prediction rule was derived over a 1-year period and then validated over the following 8 months in a new set of fever and neutropenia episodes. Patients were excluded if they presented with comorbidity or an abnormal chest x-ray (CXR). RESULTS: Significant bacterial infection (SBI; defined as any blood or urine culture positive for bacteria, interstitial or lobar consolidation on CXR, or unexpected death from infection) was documented in 43 of the 227 episodes. Multivariate analysis found four significant factors: bone marrow disease, general appearance unwell on initial examination, monocyte count less than 0.1 x 10(9)/L, and peak oral or oral equivalent temperature greater than 39 degrees C. Only the monocyte count contributed to determining a low-risk group, excluding SBI with 84% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 61% to 100%), 42% specificity (95% CI, 38% to 46%), and a negative predictive value of 92% (95% CI, 76% to 100%). If the monocyte count was >/= 0.1 x 10(9)/L at the time of presentation (low risk), the incidences of SBI and bacteremia were 8% and 5%, respectively, versus 25% and 17% in the high-risk group. When validated in a new population of 136 episodes of fever and neutropenia, the incidences of SBI and bacteremia in the low-risk group were 12% and 5%, respectively, and 25% and 19% in the high-risk group. CONCLUSION: Pediatric oncology outpatients with fever and neutropenia who present with an initial monocyte count of >/= 0.1 x 10(9)/L and do not have comorbidity or an abnormal CXR at the time of presentation are at lower risk for SBI and can be considered for less aggressive initial therapy.     

Cefepime monotherapy as an empirical initial treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia

Currently, monotherapy is considered a valid alternative to the combination antibiotic treatments used for initial, empirical management of febrile neutropenia. The advent of new cephalosporins warrants assessment. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of cefepime monotherapy in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile granulocytopenia (< 1000 leukocytes/muL and/or < 500 neutrophils/muL). A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized trial was conducted. Initial treatment consisted of iv cefepime, 2 g every 8 h. If the patient was still febrile after 72 h, amikacin, vancomycin/teicoplanin, and amphotericin B were added sequentially. Response was evaluated according to EORTC criteria. One hundred twenty episodes were analyzed in 81 males and 39 females (median age, 52 yr; range, 15-83). The median leukocyte count at the time of diagnosis was 781 microL(-1) (range, 100-2600) and the median neutrophil count was 173 microL(-1) (range 0-500). The median duration of neutropenia (< 1000 neutrophils/microL) was 4.8 d (range, 3-20). Fifty-two episodes (44%) were confirmed microbiologically (42 presented as bacteremia), 31 with Gram-positive bacteria and 21 with Gram-negative bacteria, 47 (39.3%) were confirmed clinically, 16 (13.3%) were considered as probable infections, and 5 (4.2%) as doubtful infections. Protocol success was achieved in 110 episodes (91.7%), 8 (6.6%) were treatment failures, and 2 (1.7%) were not evaluable. Ninety-nine episodes (83.3%) were controlled with cefepime monotherapy, with 19 other episodes requiring additional antibiotics: amikacin in 7 (5.8%), amikacin + vancomycin/teicoplanin in 12 (10.1%). Three patients (2,5%) died during an episode of neutropenic fever. Cefepime is effective as an initial, empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. The early addition of amikacin and/or vancomycin resolves most of the monotherapy failures, which seem somewhat lower than with other monotherapies.