Long-term discontinuation of warfarin in a patient with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device without complication

A 38-year-old woman with peripartum cardiomyopathy underwent placement of a HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Postoperatively, she refused warfarin therapy and was maintained on aspirin monotherapy for 19 months. She did not experience thrombotic or thromboembolic complications associated with lack of oral vitamin K antagonist anticoagulation. Our patient represents the longest reported duration of a patient with HM3 LVAD maintained without warfarin without evidence of thrombotic or thromboembolic events.     

Optimal cannula positioning of HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device

Cannula position in HeartMate II and HeartWare left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is associated with clinical outcome. This study aimed to investigate the clinical implication of the device positioning in HeartMate 3 LVAD cohort. Consecutive patients who underwent HeartMate 3 LVAD implantation were followed for one year from index discharge. At index discharge, chest X-ray parameters were measured: (a) cannula coronal angle, (b) height of pump bottom, (c) cannula sagittal angle, and (d) cannula lumen area. The association of each measurement of cannula position with one-year clinical outcomes was investigated. Sixty-four HeartMate 3 LVAD patients (58 years old, 64% male) were enrolled. In the multivariable Cox regression model, the cannula coronal angle was a significant predictor of death or heart failure readmission (hazard ratio 1.27 [1.01-1.60], P = .045). Patients with a cannula coronal angle ≤28° had lower central venous pressure (P = .030), lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (P = .027), and smaller left ventricular size (P = .019) compared to those with the angle >28°. Right ventricular size and parameters of right ventricular function were also better in the narrow angle group, as was one-year cumulative incidence of death or heart failure readmission (10% vs. 50%, P = .008). Narrow cannula coronal angle in patients with HeartMate 3 LVADs was associated with improved cardiac unloading and lower incidence of death or heart failure readmission. Larger studies to confirm the implication of optimal device positioning are warranted.     

The use of a biventricular assist device for postcardiotomy profound biventricular failure

A 58-year-old woman who could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass was treated with a biventricular assist device (BVAD) using a centrifugal pump for the left side and a pneumatic pulsatile pump for the right side. At the initiation of the BVAD support, predominant right ventricular failure was recognized and therefore weaning was begun from the left side. The left ventricular assist device was discontinued after 87 h and the patient was finally weaned from the right ventricular assist device after 205 h. Despite the complete recovery of cardiac function, the patient developed renal failure followed by an intractable infection and died of multiple organ failure on the 59th postoperative day (POD).     

Right ventricular failure after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device: analysis of predictors and outcomes

Postoperative right ventricular failure is a serious complication for up to 50% of patients following LVAD insertion. Predicting RV failure is an important factor for patients as planned BiVAD support has been shown to correlate with better outcomes compared to delayed BiVAD to LVAD conversion. This retrospective study examined prospectively collected data for 101 patients implanted with an LVAD between 2003 and 2013, aiming to establish preoperative predictive factors for RVF post‐LVAD insertion, analyze outcomes, and validate existing RVF scoring systems. In our cohort, 63 patients (62.4%) developed RV failure and consequently demonstrated consistently poorer survival throughout the follow‐up period (log‐rank p = 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression identified two significant variables: cardiac index <2.2 preoperatively despite inotropic support (OR 4.6 [95%CI 1.8–11.8]; p = 0.001) and preoperative tricuspid regurgitation (OR 8.1 [95%CI 1.9–34]; p = 0.004). Patients who developed RV failure had more complicated postoperative courses including longer ICU stay (p < 0.001), higher incidence of transfusions (p = 0.03) and re‐intubation (p = 0.001), longer ventilation duration (p < 0.001), and higher incidence of returning to theater (p = 0.0008). This study found that previous validation models had only moderate correlation with our population emphasizing the need for prospective validation of these scores in the current era of continuous flow devices.     

A novel,highly discriminatory risk model predicting acute severe right ventricular failure in patients undergoing continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device implant

Various risk models with differing discriminatory power and predictive accuracy have been used to predict right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. There remains an unmet need for a contemporary risk score for continuous flow (CF)‐LVADs. We sought to independently validate and compare existing risk models in a large cohort of patients and develop a simple, yet highly predictive risk score for acute, severe RVF. Data from the Mechanical Circulatory Support Research Network (MCSRN) registry, consisting of patients who underwent CF‐LVAD implantation, were randomly divided into equal‐sized derivation and validation samples. RVF scores were calculated for the entire sample, and the need for a right ventricular assist device (RVAD) was the primary endpoint. Candidate predictors from the derivation sample were subjected to backward stepwise logistic regression until the model with lowest Akaike information criterion value was identified. A risk score was developed based on the identified variables and their respective regression coefficients. Between May 2004 and September 2014, 734 patients underwent implantation of CF‐LVADs [HeartMate II LVAD, 76% (n = 560), HeartWare HVAD, 24% (n = 174)]. A RVAD was required in 4.5% (n = 33) of the patients [Derivation cohort, n = 15 (4.3%); Validation cohort, n = 18 (5.2%); P = 0.68)]. 19.5% of the patients (n = 143) were female, median age at implant was 59 years (IQR, 49.4–65.3), and median INTERMACS profile was 3 (IQR, 2–3). RVAD was required in 4.5% (n = 33) of the patients. Correlates of acute, severe RVF in the final model included heart rate, albumin, BUN, WBC, cardiac index, and TR severity. Areas under the curves (AUC) for most commonly used risk predictors ranged from 0.61 to 0.78. The AUC for the new model was 0.89 in the derivation and 0.92 in the validation cohort. Proposed risk model provides very high discriminatory power predicting acute severe right ventricular failure and can be reliably applied to patients undergoing placement of contemporary continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.     

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring prolonged inotropes after left ventricular assist device implantation

Limited data exist regarding patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support who require long-term inotropes. Our primary objective was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and all-cause mortality of LVAD recipients with prolonged inotrope use (PIU). Secondary endpoints were to compare predictors of PIU, mortality, risk of late re-initiation of inotropes, time to gastrointestinal bleed (GIB), infection, and arrhythmias. Retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients with primary continuous-flow LVADs implanted from January 2008 to February 2017 and the patients were followed up through February 2018. We defined PIU as ≥14 days of inotrope support. Kaplan–Meier method, competing risk models and Cox proportional hazard models were used. Final analytic sample was 203 patients, 58% required PIU, and 10% were discharged on inotropes. There was no difference in preimplant characteristics. One-year survival rate was 87% if no PIU required, 74% if PIU required, and 72% if discharged on inotropes. PIU was associated with longer length of stay and higher incidence of GIB. We found no association between PIU and late re-initiation of inotropes, infection or arrhythmias. Adjusted hazard risk of death was increased in patients with PIU (HR = 1.66, P = .046), older age (HR = 1.28, P = .031), and higher creatinine levels (HR = 1.60, P = .007). Prolonged inotrope use is frequently encountered following LVAD implantation and is associated with adverse prognosis but remains a therapeutic option. Inability to wean inotropes prior to hospital discharge is a marker of patients at particularly higher risk of mortality following LVAD implantation.     

Long‐term support by left ventricular assist device for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a heart muscle disorder characterized by right ventricular enlargement, right heart failure (HF), and ventricular arrhythmias which lead to sudden death especially in young adults. Current recommendations for management of patients with ARVC are antiarrhythmic medications, catheter ablation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death. However, despite these treatments, few patients suffer from recurrent ventricular arrhythmias or HF unresponsive to conventional management. Heart transplantation (HTx) is a preferred treatment for these cases, but because of a persistent donor heart shortage in Japan, ventricular assist device (VAD) support has become an important option for a management of the end‐stage ARVC. Previous articles reported 4 cases of a successful management by left ventricular assist device (LVAD), but the longest interval of LVAD support was only 333 days. We present 3 cases of ARVC patients who were successfully managed by LVAD implantation for more than a year. These 3 cases are unconventional examples of ARVC patients, considering the nature of the disease. The novelty of these cases should be taken in the context of the extremely long waiting period for HTx in Japan.     

Assessment of right pump outflow banding and speed changes on pulmonary hemodynamics during biventricular support with two rotary left ventricular assist devices

The absence of an effective, easily implantable right ventricular assist device (RVAD) significantly diminishes long‐term treatment options for patients with biventricular heart failure. The implantation of a second rotary left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for right heart support is therefore being considered; however, this approach exhibits technical challenges when adapting current devices to produce the lower pressures required of the pulmonary circulation. Hemodynamic adaptation may be achieved by either reducing the rotational speed of the right pump impeller or reducing the diameter of the right outflow cannula by the placement of a restricting band; however, the optimal value and influence of changes to each parameter are not well understood. Hemodynamics were therefore investigated using different banding diameters of the right outflow cannula (3–6.5 mm) and pump speeds (500–4500 rpm), using two identical rotary blood pumps coupled to a pulsatile mock circulation loop. Reducing the speed of the right pump from 4900 rpm (for left ventricle support) to 3500 rpm, or banding the Ø10 mm (area 78.5 mm²) right outflow graft to Ø5.4 mm (22.9 mm²) produced suitable hemodynamics. Pulmonary pressures were most sensitive to banding diameters, especially when RVAD flow exceeded LVAD flow. This occurred between Ø5.3 and Ø6.5 mm (22.05–38.5 mm²) and speeds between 3200 and 4400 rpm, with the flow imbalance potentially leading to pulmonary congestion. Total flow was not affected by banding diameters and speeds below this range, and only increased slightly at higher values. Both right outflow banding or right pump speed reduction were found to be effective techniques to allow a rotary LVAD to be used directly for right heart support. However, the observed sensitivity to diameter and speed indicate that challenges may be presented when setting appropriate values for each patient, and control over these parameters is desirable.