Delay-tuned combination-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the vocalizing mustached bat

1. FM-FM neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat are sensitive to a pair of frequency-modulated (FM) sounds that simulates an FM component of the orientation sound and an FM component of the echo. These neurons are tuned to particular delays between the two FM components, suggesting an encoding of target range information. The response properties of these FM-FM neurons, however, have previously been studied only with synthesized orientation sounds and echoes delivered from a loud-speaker as substitutes for the bat's own orientation sounds and corresponding echoes. In this study, the combination sensitivity and delay tuning of FM-FM neurons were examined while the bat was actively vocalizing. 2. When the bat produced orientation sounds in an anechoic environment, or synthesized single FM echoes were delivered to a silent bat, the FM-FM neurons showed weak or no response. In contrast, when synthesized FM echoes were delivered with a particular delay from the FM component of the vocalized orientation sounds, the FM-FM neurons exhibited strong facilitative responses. 3. In both the vocalizing bats and the silent bats with substituted synthesized orientation sounds, all FM-FM neurons tested responded preferentially to the same echo harmonic (FM2, FM3, or FM4). 4. In vocalizing bats, FM-FM neurons showed maximum response to an echo FM component delivered with a particular delay (best delay) from an FM component in the orientation sound. Best delays measured with vocalized orientation sounds were nearly the same as those measured with synthesized orientation sounds. 5. The equivalent effect of a vocalized orientation sound and a synthesized FM1 component on the activity of FM-FM neurons indicates that, during echolocation, the FM1 component in the vocalized orientation sound stimulates the auditory system and conditions the FM-FM neurons to be sensitive to echoes with particular delays from the vocalized orientation sounds. 6. The amount of vocal self-stimulation to the inner ear by the bat's own vocalized sounds was measured by recording cochlear microphonic potentials (CMs). Spectral analysis of CM indicated that the amount of vocal self-stimulation by each harmonic of an orientation sound was equivalent to a sound of 70 dB sound pressure level (SPL) for the first harmonic (H1), 91 dB SPL for H2, 83 dB SPL for H3, and 70 dB SPL for H4, when the amplitude of the vocalized sound was 117 dB SPL at 5 cm in front of the bat's mouth.     

Distribution of combination-sensitive neurons in the ventral fringe area of the auditory cortex of the mustached bat

1. The orientation sound (pulse) of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, consists of long constant-frequency components (CF1-4) and short frequency-modulated components (FM1-4). The auditory cortex of this bat contains several combination-sensitive areas: FM-FM, DF, VA, VF, and CF/CF. The FM-FM area consists of neurons tuned to a combination of the pulse FM1 and the echo FMn (n = 2, 3, or 4) and has an echo-delay (target-range) axis. Our preliminary anatomical studies with tritiated amino acids suggest that the FM-FM area projects to the dorsal fringe (DF) area, which in turn projects to the ventral fringe (VF) area. The aim of our study was to characterize the response properties of VF neurons and to explore the functional organization of the VF area. Acoustic stimuli delivered to the bats were CF tones, FM sounds, and their combinations mimicking the pulse emitted by the mustached bat and the echo. 2. Like the FM-FM and DF areas, the VF area is composed of three types of FM-FM combination-sensitive neurons: FM1-FM2, FM1-FM3, and FM1-FM4. These neurons show little or no response to a pulse alone, echo alone, single CF tone or single FM sound. They do, however, show a strong facilitative response to a pulse-echo pair with a particular echo delay. The essential components in the pulse-echo pair for facilitation are the FM1 of the pulse and the FMn of the echo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Biosonar signals and cerebellar auditory neurons of the mustached bat

In the vermis (VIp, VIIa, VIIp, and VIII), crus, and paraflocculus of unanesthetized mustached bats Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, responses of single neurons to acoustic stimuli were studied. The stimuli delivered were constant-frequency (CF) tones, frequency-modulated (FM) sounds, noise bursts (NBs), and sounds similar to the orientation sounds (pulses) of the species and echoes. The effect of ablation of the cerebellar cortex on vocalization was also investigated to explore whether the cerebellum was involved in sound emission. In the cerebellum of the mustached bat, auditory neurons are predominantly tuned to frequencies within the bands between 23 and 30, 55 and 63, or 85 and 94 kHz, which are found in the first, second, and third harmonics of bat's biosonar signals, respectively. The first harmonic is represented in the paraflocculus. The second harmonic is represented in vermis VIp and VIIa and crus I and IIa. The third harmonic is mainly represented in vermis VIIp and crus IIp. Different lobules represent different frequencies, but there is no systematic tonotopic representation in each lobule. The resting frequency of the CF component of the second harmonic (CF2) of the pulse differs among bats. The majority of auditory neurons in vermis VIp and VIIa and crus IIa are tuned to the CF2 frequency of the bat's own pulse. The frequency-tuning curves of cerebellar neurons are broader than those of peripheral neurons, reflected in significantly lower quality factors of Q-10, -30, and -50 dBs. In vermis VIp and VIIa, there are tiny clusters of FM-FM and CF/CF combination-sensitive neurons. They show strong facilitation of responses when two FM or CF sounds are delivered with particular relationships in the frequency, amplitude, and time domains. Because the clusters of these combination-sensitive neurons in the cerebellum are so small, we found no sign of a systematic representation of certain acoustic parameters, unlike that found in the auditory cortex. In vermis VIp and VIIa, there is a large cluster of NB-sensitive neurons that are more sensitive to NBs than to CF tones. The wider the bandwidth of the NBs, the better are the responses of these NB-sensitive neurons. The ablation of the vermis (VIp, VIIa, and VIIp), crus, and paraflocculus increases the variation of the CF frequency of the pulse. The ablation of the crus and paraflocculus causes a clear increase in the variation of CF frequency. The ablation of vermis (VIp, VIIa, and VIIp) has only a small effect on the variation. Any of the above ablations has little effect on the repetition rate of the pulse emission and the duration of pulses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Facilitatory and inhibitory frequency tuning of combination-sensitive neurons in the primary auditory cortex of mustached bats

Mustached bats, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, emit echolocation pulses that consist of four harmonics with a fundamental consisting of a constant frequency (CF(1-4)) component followed by a short, frequency-modulated (FM(1-4)) component. During flight, the pulse fundamental frequency is systematically lowered by an amount proportional to the velocity of the bat relative to the background so that the Doppler-shifted echo CF(2) is maintained within a narrowband centered at approximately 61 kHz. In the primary auditory cortex, there is an expanded representation of 60.6- to 63. 0-kHz frequencies in the "Doppler-shifted CF processing" (DSCF) area where neurons show sharp, level-tolerant frequency tuning. More than 80% of DSCF neurons are facilitated by specific frequency combinations of approximately 25 kHz (BF(low)) and approximately 61 kHz (BF(high)). To examine the role of these neurons for fine frequency discrimination during echolocation, we measured the basic response parameters for facilitation to synthesized echolocation signals varied in frequency, intensity, and in their temporal structure. Excitatory response areas were determined by presenting single CF tones, facilitative curves were obtained by presenting paired CF tones. All neurons showing facilitation exhibit at least two facilitative response areas, one of broad spectral tuning to frequencies centered at BF(low) corresponding to a frequency in the lower half of the echolocation pulse FM(1) sweep and another of sharp tuning to frequencies centered at BF(high) corresponding to the CF(2) in the echo. Facilitative response areas for BF(high) are broadened by approximately 0.38 kHz at both the best amplitude and 50 dB above threshold response and show lower thresholds compared with the single-tone excitatory BF(high) response areas. An increase in the sensitivity of DSCF neurons would lead to target detection from farther away and/or for smaller targets than previously estimated on the basis of single-tone responses to BF(high). About 15% of DSCF neurons show oblique excitatory and facilitatory response areas at BF(high) so that the center frequency of the frequency-response function at any amplitude decreases with increasing stimulus amplitudes. DSCF neurons also have inhibitory response areas that either skirt or overlap both the excitatory and facilitatory response areas for BF(high) and sometimes for BF(low). Inhibition by a broad range of frequencies contributes to the observed sharpness of frequency tuning in these neurons. Recordings from orthogonal penetrations show that the best frequencies for facilitation as well as excitation do not change within a cortical column. There does not appear to be any systematic representation of facilitation ratios across the cortical surface of the DSCF area.     

Combination-sensitive neurons in the ventroanterior area of the auditory cortex of the mustached bat

1. Because the ventroanterior (VA) area is one of the target areas of the FM-FM area in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, response properties of combination-sensitive neurons in this area were studied with constant-frequency (CF) tones, frequency-modulated (FM) sounds, and sounds similar to the bat's biosonar signal (pulse), which consisted of long CF components (CF1-4) and short FM components (FM1-4). CF1-4 and FM1-4 are the components in the four harmonics (H1-4) of the pulse. 2. Combination-sensitive neurons are clustered in a small area immediately anteroventral to the Doppler-shifted CF processing (DSCF) area and posteroventral to the anterior division of the primary auditory cortex. Because this cluster in the VA area is small, it was difficult to record a sufficient number of combination-sensitive neurons to explore the functional organization of the cluster, but it was found that the response properties of these VA neurons were unique. 3. Combination-sensitive neurons in the VA area are tuned to particular combinations of signal elements similar to the first and second harmonics of the pulse and/or echo. Unlike neurons in the FM-FM, dorsal fringe (DF), and CF/CF areas, no neurons in the VA area are tuned to the signal elements in the first and third or fourth harmonics. 4. The great majority of combination-sensitive neurons in the VA area can not be easily classified into either FM-FM or CF/CF neurons, because they show facilitative responses to combinations of CF1/CF2, FM1-FM2, and FM1-CF2. Therefore, they are called H1-H2 neurons. In the FM-FM and CF/CF areas, all the neurons could be easily classified as FM-FM or CF/CF. This uniqueness of H1-H2 neurons is related to the fact that their best frequencies for facilitation are predominantly between 61.0 and 62.0 kHz, i.e., within the frequency range of stabilized Doppler-shifted echo CF2. 5. In addition to 27 H1-H2 neurons, 7 FM1-FM2 neurons were also recorded in the VA area. The best delays of these H1-H2 and FM1-FM2 neurons measured with FM1-FM2 pairs are between 1 and 10 ms. Unlike neurons in the FM-FM and DF areas, their delay-tuning curves are very broad, even if their best delays are short, and extend beyond zero delay to several millisecond "negative" delays of the FM2 from the FM1, i.e., several millisecond delays of the FM1 from the FM2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Roles of inhibition in complex auditory responses in the inferior colliculus: inhibited combination-sensitive neurons

We studied the functional properties and underlying neural mechanisms associated with inhibitory combination-sensitive neurons in the mustached bat's inferior colliculus (IC). In these neurons, the excitatory response to best frequency tones was suppressed by lower frequency signals (usually in the range of 12-30 kHz) in a time-dependant manner. Of 143 inhibitory units, the majority (71%) were type I, in which low-frequency sounds evoked inhibition only. In the remainder, however, the low-frequency inhibitory signal also evoked excitation. Of these, excitation preceded the inhibition in type E/I units (16%), whereas in type I/E units (13%), excitation followed the inhibition. Type E/I and I/E units were distinct in the tuning and threshold sensitivity of low-frequency responses, whereas type I units overlapped the other types in these features. In 71 neurons, antagonists to receptors for glycine [strychnine (STRY)] or GABA [bicuculline (BIC)] were applied microiontophoretically. These antagonists failed to eliminate combination-sensitive inhibition in 92% (STRY), 93% (BIC), and 87% (BIC + STRY) of the type I units tested. However, inhibition was reduced in many neurons. Results were similar for type E/I and I/E inhibitory neurons. The results indicate that there are distinct populations of combination-sensitive inhibited neurons in the IC and that these populations are at least partly independent of glycine or GABAA receptors in the IC. We propose that these populations originate in different brain stem auditory nuclei, that they may be modified by interactions within the IC, and that they may perform different spectrotemporal analyses of vocal signals.     

Delay-tuned neurons in auditory cortex of mustached bat are not suited for processing directional information

1. The mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, emits bisonar pulses each consisting of eight components: CF1-4 and FM1-4. In the auditory cortex of the bat there are arrays of FM-FM neurons that are tuned to particular delays of echo FMn (n = 2, 3, or 4) from pulse FM1. They are specialized for the processing of target-range information. The FM signal is suited for ranging and also for target localization. Therefore we studied the directional sensitivity of FM-FM neurons with pulse FM1 and echo FMn. One of the FM1-FMn pair was moved around the bat's head while the other was fixed in front of the bat. 2. FM-FM neurons are sharply tuned in echo delay and are broadly tuned in echo amplitude. That is, they are tuned to a target that has a particular cross-sectional area and that is located at a particular distance from the bat. Their best amplitudes for echoes range between 8 and 73 dB sound pressure level (SPL). The best amplitude is approximately 30 dB higher than minimum threshold in the majority of neurons. 3. The higher the best amplitude is relative to minimum threshold, the larger the receptive field is at the best amplitude. The receptive field of FM-FM neurons at 30 dB above minimum threshold is always so large that it covers the entire contralateral auditory field or the entire contralateral field and the medial half of the ipsilateral auditory field. The large size of the receptive field and the uniform distribution of response magnitudes within the receptive field indicate that FM-FM neurons are not suited for sound localization. Directional information is probably processed in parallel by a separate population of neurons other than FM-FM neurons. 4. The receptive field of FM-FM neurons at 10 dB above minimum threshold is much smaller than that at 30 dB above minimum threshold, but it is still large. The mean azimuthal and elevational widths for echo FMn are greater than 70 degrees in all directions. There is no sign that FM-FM neurons are more directional than peripheral neurons. Furthermore, there is neither an azimuthal nor an elevational axis within the FM-FM area. 5. Mean best azimuths of FM-FM neurons are different for each echo FM harmonic: lateral 35 degrees for FM2 and lateral 19 degrees for FM3 and FM4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Roles of inhibition in creating complex auditory responses in the inferior colliculus: facilitated combination-sensitive neurons

We studied roles of inhibition on temporally sensitive facilitation in combination-sensitive neurons from the mustached bat's inferior colliculus (IC). In these integrative neurons, excitatory responses to best frequency (BF) tones are enhanced by much lower frequency signals presented in a specific temporal relationship. Most facilitated neurons (76%) showed inhibition at delays earlier than or later than the delays causing facilitation. The timing of inhibition at earlier delays was closely related to the best delay of facilitation, but the inhibition had little influence on the duration or strength of the facilitatory interaction. Local iontophoretic application of antagonists to receptors for glycine (strychnine, STRY) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (bicuculline, BIC) showed that STRY abolished facilitation in 96% of tested units, but BIC eliminated facilitation in only 28%. This suggests that facilitatory interactions are created in IC and reveals a differential role for these neurotransmitters. The facilitation may be created by coincidence of a postinhibitory rebound excitation activated by the low-frequency signal with the BF-evoked excitation. Unlike facilitation, inhibition at earlier delays was not eliminated by application of antagonists, suggesting an origin in lower brain stem nuclei. However, inhibition at delays later than facilitation, like facilitation itself, appears to originate within IC and to be more dependent on glycinergic than GABAergic mechanisms. Facilitatory and inhibitory interactions displayed by these combination-sensitive neurons encode information within sonar echoes and social vocalizations. The results indicate that these complex response properties arise through a series of neural interactions in the auditory brain stem and midbrain.     

Corticofugal modulation of the midbrain frequency map in the bat auditory system

The auditory system, like the visual and somatosensory systems, contains topographic maps in its central neural pathways. These maps can be modified by sensory deprivation, injury and experience in both young and adult animals. Such plasticity has been explained by changes in the divergent and convergent projections of the ascending sensory system. Another possibility, however, is that plasticity may be mediated by descending corticofugal connections. We have investigated the role of descending connections from the cortex to the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat. Electrical stimulation of the auditory cortex causes a downward shift in the preferred frequencies of collicular neurons toward that of the stimulated cortical neurons. This results in a change in the frequency map within the colliculus. Moreover, similar changes can be induced by repeated bursts of sound at moderate intensities. Thus, one role of the mammalian corticofugal system may be to modify subcortical sensory maps in response to sensory experience.     

DSCF neurons within the primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat process frequency modulations present within social calls

Neurons in the Doppler-shifted constant frequency processing (DSCF) area in the primary auditory cortex of mustached bats, Pteronotus parnellii, are multifunctional, responding both to echolocation and communication sounds. Simultaneous presentation of a DSCF neuron's best low and high frequencies (BF(low) and BF(high), respectively) facilitates its response. BF(low) corresponds to a frequency in the frequency-modulated (FM) component of the first harmonic in the echolocation pulse, and BF(high) corresponds to the constant frequency (CF) component in the second harmonic of the echo. We systematically varied the slopes, bandwidths, and central frequencies of FMs traversing the BF(high) region to arrive at the "best FM" for single DSCF neurons. We report that nearly half (46%) of DSCF neurons preferred linear FMs to CFs and average response magnitude to FMs was not significantly less (P = 0.08) than that to CFs at BF(high) when each test stimulus was paired with a CF at BF(low). For linear FMs ranging in slope from 0.04 to 4.0 kHz/ms and in bandwidth from 0.44 to 7.88 kHz, the majority of DSCF neurons preferred upward (55%) to downward (21%) FMs. Central frequencies of the best FMs were typically close to but did not always match a neuron's BF(high). Neurons exhibited combination-sensitivity to "call fragments" (calls that were band-pass filtered in the BF(high) region) paired with their BF(low). Our data show a close match between the modulation direction of a neuron's best FM and that of its preferred call fragment. These response properties show that DSCF neurons extract multiple parameters of FMs and are specialized for processing both FMs for communication and CFs for echolocation.     

Inhibition and level-tolerant frequency tuning in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat

For echolocation the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii, emits complex orientation sounds (pulses), each consisting of four harmonics with long constant-frequency components (CF1-4) followed by short frequency-modulated components (FM1-4). The CF signals are best suited for target detection and measurement of target velocity. The CF/CF area of the auditory cortex of this species contains neurons sensitive to pulse-echo pairs. These CF/CF combination-sensitive neurons extract velocity information from Doppler-shifted echoes. In this study we electrophysiologically investigated the frequency tuning of CF/CF neurons for excitation, facilitation, and inhibition. CF1/CF2 and CF1/CF3 combination-sensitive neurons responded poorly to individual signal elements in pulse-echo pairs but showed strong facilitation of responses to pulse-echo pairs. The essential components in the pairs were CF1 of the pulse and CF2 or CF3 of the echo. In 68% of CF/CF neurons, the frequency-tuning curves for facilitation were extremely sharp for CF2 or CF3 and were "level-tolerant" so that the bandwidths of the tuning curves were less than 5.0% of best frequencies even at high stimulus levels. Facilitative tuning curves for CF1 were level tolerant only in 6% of the neurons studied. CF/CF neurons were specialized for fine analysis of the frequency relationship between two CF sounds regardless of sound pressure levels. Some CF/CF neurons responded to single-tone stimuli. Frequency-tuning curves for excitation (responses to single-tone stimuli) were extremely sharp and level tolerant for CF2 or CF3 in 59% of CF1/CF2 neurons and 70% of CF1/CF3 neurons. Tuning to CF1 was level tolerant in only 9% of these neurons. Sharp level-tolerant tuning may be the neural basis for small difference limens in frequency at high stimulus levels. Sharp level-tolerant tuning curves were sandwiched between broad inhibitory areas. Best frequencies for inhibition were slightly higher or lower than the best frequencies for facilitation and excitation. We thus conclude that sharp level-tolerant tuning curves are produced by inhibition. The extent to which neural sharpening occurred differed among groups of neurons tuned to different frequencies. The more important the frequency analysis of a particular component in biosonar signals, the more pronounced the neural sharpening. This was in addition to the peripheral specialization for fine frequency analysis of that component. The difference in bandwidth or quality factor between the excitatory tuning curves of peripheral neurons and the facilitative and excitatory tuning curves of CF/CF neurons was larger at higher stimulus levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The personalized auditory cortex of the mustached bat: adaptation for echolocation

1. In the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii, the "resting" frequency of the constant-frequency component of the second harmonic (CF2) of the orientation sound (biosonar signal) is different among individuals within a range from 59.69 to 63.33 kHz. The standard deviation of CF2 resting frequency is 0.091 kHz on the average for individual bats. The male's CF2 resting frequency (61.250 +/- 0.534 kHz, n = 58) is 1.040 kHz lower than the female's (62.290 +/- 0.539 kHz, n = 58) on the average. Females' resting frequencies measured in December are not different from those measured in April when almost all of them are pregnant. Therefore, the orientation sound is sexually dimorphic. 2. In the DSCF (Doppler-shifted CF processing) area of the auditory cortex, tonotopic representation differs among individual bats. The higher the CF2 resting frequency of the bat's own sound, the higher the frequencies represented in the DSCF area of that bat. There is a unique match between the tonotopic representation and the CF2 resting frequency. This match indicates that the auditory cortex is "personalized" for echolocation and that the CF2 resting frequency is like a signature of the orientation sound. 3. If a bat's resting frequency is normalized to 61.00 kHz, the DSCF area overrepresents 60.6-62.3 kHz. The central region of this overrepresented band is 61.1-61.2 kHz. This focal band matches the "reference" frequency to which the CF2 frequency of a Doppler-shifted echo is stabilized by Doppler-shift compensation. 4. Since DSCF neurons are extraordinarily sharply tuned in frequency, the personalization of the auditory cortex or system is not only suited for the detection of wing beats of insects, but also for the reduction of the masking effect on echolocation of consepecific's biosonar signals. 5. Because the orientation sound is sexually dimorphic and the auditory cortex is personalized, the tonotopic representation of the auditory cortex is also sexually dimorphic.     

Modulation of cochlear hair cells by the auditory cortex in the mustached bat.

The corticofugal (descending) auditory system forms multiple feedback loops, and adjusts and improves auditory signal processing in the subcortical auditory nuclei. However, the mechanism by which the corticofugal system modulates cochlear hair cells has been unexplored. We found that electric stimulation of cortical neurons via the corticofugal system modulates cochlear hair cells in a highly specific way according to the relationship in terms of best frequency between cortical neurons and hair cells. Such frequency-specific effects can be explained by selective corticofugal modulation of individual olivocochlear efferent fibers.     

Corticofugal modulation of multi-parametric auditory selectivity in the midbrain of the big brown bat

Corticofugal modulation of sub-cortical auditory selectivity has been shown previously in mammals for frequency, amplitude, time, and direction domains in separate studies. As such, these studies do not show if multi-parametric corticofugal modulation can be mediated through the same sub-cortical neuron. Here we specifically studied corticofugal modulation of best frequency (BF), best amplitude (BA), and best azimuth (BAZ) at the same neuron in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, using focal electrical stimulation in the auditory cortex. Among 53 corticofugally inhibited collicular neurons examined, cortical electrical stimulation produced a shift of all three measurements (i.e., BF, BA, and BAZ) toward the value of stimulated cortical neuron in 13 (24.5%) neurons, two measurements (i.e., BF and BAZ or BA and BAZ) in 19 (36%) neurons, and one measurement in 16 (30%) neurons. Cortical electrical stimulation did not shift any of these measurements in the remaining five (9.5%) neurons. Corticofugally induced collicular BF shift was symmetrical, whereas the shift in collicular BA or BAZ was asymmetrical. The amount of shift in each measurement was significantly correlated with each measurement difference between recorded collicular and stimulated cortical neurons. However, shifts of three measurements were not correlated with each other. Furthermore, average measurement difference between collicular and cortical neurons was larger for collicular neurons with measurement shifts than for those without shifts. These data indicate that multi-parametric corticofugal modulation can be mediated through the same subcortical neuron based on the difference in auditory selectivity between subcortical and cortical neurons.     

Frequency and amplitude representations in anterior primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat

The orientation sound emitted by the Panamanian mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii rubiginosus, consists of four harmonics. The third harmonic is 6-12 dB weaker than the predominant second harmonic and consists of a long constant-frequency component (CF3) at about 92 kHz and a short frequency-modulated component (FM3) sweeping from about 92 to 74 kHz. Our primary aim is to examine how CF3 and FM3 are represented in a region of the primary auditory cortex anterior to the Doppler-shifted constant-frequency (DSCF) area. Extracellular recordings of neuronal responses from the unanesthetized animal were obtained during free-field stimulation of the ears with pure tones. FM sounds, and signals simulating their orientation sounds and echoes. Response properties of neurons and tonotopic and amplitopic representations were examined in the primary and the anteroventral nonprimary auditory cortex. In the anterior primary auditory cortex, neurons responded strongly to single pure tones but showed no facilitative responses to paired stimuli. Neurons with best frequencies from 110 to 90 kHz were tonotopically organized rostrocaudally, with higher frequencies located more rostrally. Neurons tuned to 92-94 kHz were overpresented, whereas neurons tuned to sound between 64 and 91 kHz were rarely found. Consequently a striking discontinuity in frequency representation from 91 to 64 kHz was found across the anterior DSCF border. Most neurons exhibited monotonic impulse-count functions and responded maximally to sound pressure level (SPL). There were also neurons that responded best to weak sounds but unlike the DSCF area, amplitopic representation was not found. Thus, the DSCF area is quite unique not only in its extensive representation of frequencies in the second harmonic CF component but also in its amplitopic representation. The anteroventral nonprimary auditory cortex consisted of neurons broadly tuned to pure tones between 88 and 99 kHz. Neither tonotopic nor amplitopic representation was observed. Caudal to this area and near the anteroventral border of the DSCF area, a small cluster of FM-FM neurons sensitive to particular echo delays was identified. The responses of these neurons fluctuated significantly during repetitive stimulation.     

Brief and short-term corticofugal modulation of subcortical auditory responses in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus

Recent studies show that the auditory corticofugal system modulates and improves ongoing signal processing and reorganizes frequency map according to auditory experience in the central nucleus of bat inferior colliculus. However, whether all corticofugally affected collicular neurons are involved in both types of modulation has not been determined. In this study, we demonstrate that one group (51%) of collicular neurons participates only in corticofugal modulation of ongoing signal processing, while a second group (49%) of collicular neurons participates in both modulation of ongoing signal processing and in reorganization of the auditory system.     

Multiple time axes for representation of echo delays in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat

The properties of the orientation sound (pulse) of the Jamaican mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii is the same as the Panamanian mustached bat, P.p. rubiginosus. It consists of four harmonics, each containing a long constant-frequency (CF) component followed by a short frequency-modulated (FM) component. Thus, there are eight components in total: CF1-4 and FM1-4. The combination-sensitive area of the auditory cortex in P.p. parnellii consists of two major divisions (FM-FM and CF/CF areas) as in P.p. rubiginosus. The FM-FM area projects to the dorsal fringe (DF) and other areas. Response latencies of neurons in the DF area are longer than those in the FM-FM area. The distribution of latencies is unimodal for the FM-FM area, but bimodal for the DF area. In this electrophysiological study of the response properties of neurons in the DF and FM-FM areas, our aim was to find out how signal processing might be different between the two areas. Both the FM-FM and DF areas consist of three types of FM-FM combination-sensitive neurons: FM1-FM2, FM1-FM3, and FM1-FM4. They do not respond or respond poorly to pulse alone, echo alone, single CF tones or single FM sounds. But they show strong facilitation of response to the echo when it is delivered with particular delays from the pulse. The essential elements in the pulse-echo pair for facilitation are the FM1 of the pulse and FM2 or FM3 or FM4 of the echo. In both the FM-FM and DF areas, the great majority of neurons show short-lasting facilitation, and other neurons show long-lasting facilitation. FM-FM neurons are tuned to particular echo delays, i.e., target ranges. In both the FM-FM and DF areas, the width of a delay-tuning curve is linearly related to the value of a best delay. There is no sign that processing of range information is more specialized in the DF area than the FM-FM area. In both the FM-FM and DF areas, three types of FM-FM neurons form independent clusters. Along the major axis of each cluster, best delays for facilitative responses of neurons systematically change according to the loci of the neurons. The more posterior the location, the longer the best delay is. Therefore, there are six time (i.e., range) axes in total. The time axis in the DF area is shorter than that in the FM-FM area.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Sex-dependent hemispheric asymmetries for processing frequency-modulated sounds in the primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat

Species-specific vocalizations of mammals, including humans, contain slow and fast frequency modulations (FMs) as well as tone and noise bursts. In this study, we established sex-specific hemispheric differences in the tonal and FM response characteristics of neurons in the Doppler-shifted constant-frequency processing area in the mustached bat's primary auditory cortex (A1). We recorded single-unit cortical activity from the right and left A1 in awake bats in response to the presentation of tone bursts and linear FM sweeps that are contained within their echolocation and/or communication sounds. Peak response latencies to neurons' preferred or best FMs were significantly longer on the right compared with the left in both sexes, and in males this right-left difference was also present for the most excitatory tone burst. Based on peak response magnitudes, right hemispheric A1 neurons in males preferred low-rate, narrowband FMs, whereas those on the left were less selective, responding to FMs with a variety of rates and bandwidths. The distributions of parameters for best FMs in females were similar on the two sides. Together, our data provide the first strong physiological support of a sex-specific, spectrotemporal hemispheric asymmetry for the representation of tones and FMs in a nonhuman mammal. Specifically, our results demonstrate a left hemispheric bias in males for the representation of a diverse array of FMs differing in rate and bandwidth. We propose that these asymmetries underlie lateralized processing of communication sounds and are common to species as divergent as bats and humans.