Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty in patients with posttraumatic arthritis has produced results inferior to those in patients with nontraumatic arthritis. The use of cementless acetabular reconstruction, however, has not been extensively studied in this clinical context. Our purpose was to compare the intermediate-term results of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless acetabular component in patients with posttraumatic arthritis with those of the same procedure in patients with nontraumatic arthritis. We also compared the results of arthroplasty in patients who had had prior operative treatment of their acetabular fracture with those in patients who had had prior closed treatment of their acetabular fracture. METHODS: Thirty total hip arthroplasties were performed with use of a cementless hemispheric, fiber-metal-mesh-coated acetabular component for the treatment of posttraumatic osteoarthritis after acetabular fracture. The median interval between the fracture and the arthroplasty was thirty-seven months (range, eight to 444 months). The average age at the time of the arthroplasty was fifty-one years (range, twenty-six to eighty-six years), and the average duration of follow-up was sixty-three months (range, twenty-four to 140 months). Fifteen patients had had prior open reduction and internal fixation of their acetabular fracture (open-reduction group), and fifteen patients had had closed treatment of the acetabular fracture (closed-treatment group). The results of these thirty hip reconstructions were compared with the intermediate-term results of 204 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties with cementless acetabular reconstruction in patients with nontraumatic arthritis. RESULTS: Operative time (p < 0.001), blood loss (p < 0.001), and perioperative transfusion requirements (p < 0.001) were greater in the patients with posttraumatic arthritis than they were in the patients with nontraumatic arthritis. Of the patients with posttraumatic arthritis, those who had had open reduction and internal fixation of their acetabular fracture had a significantly longer index procedure (p = 0.01), greater blood loss (p = 0.008), and a higher transfusion requirement (p = 0.049) than those in whom the fracture had been treated by closed methods. Eight of the fifteen patients with a previous open reduction and internal fixation required an elevated acetabular liner compared with one of the fifteen patients who had been treated by closed means (p = 0.005). Two of the fifteen patients with a previous open reduction and internal fixation required bone-grafting of acetabular defects compared with seven of the fifteen patients treated by closed means (p = 0.04). The thirty patients treated for posttraumatic arthritis had an average preoperative Harris hip score of 41 points, which increased to 88 points at the time of follow-up; there was no significant difference between the open-reduction and closed-treatment groups (p = 0.39). Twenty-seven patients (90%) had a good or excellent result. There were no dislocations or deep infections. The Kaplan-Meier ten-year survival rate, with revision or radiographic loosening as the end point, was 97%. These results were similar to those of the patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty for nontraumatic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: The intermediate-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty with cementless acetabular reconstruction for posttraumatic osteoarthritis after acetabular fracture were similar to those after the same procedure for nontraumatic arthritis, regardless of whether the acetabular fracture had been internally fixed initially. However, total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture was a longer procedure with greater blood loss, especially in patients with previous open reduction and internal fixation. Previous open reduction and internal fixation predisposed the hip to more intraoperative instability but less bone deficiency.     

Use of constrained acetabular components for hip instability: an average 10-year follow-up study

The short-term efficacy of using constrained acetabular components for hip instability in the total hip arthroplasty construct has been documented. However, long-term concerns including late dislocation, loosening of components, and osteolysis have not been addressed. The authors evaluated, at an average 10.3-year follow-up, 101 tripolar constrained components (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics) used in the total hip arthroplasty construct. At final follow-up, 6 hips had dislocated or had failure of the constrained component, 5 of which were revised. In addition, 4 hips were revised for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component, 4 hips were revised for aseptic femoral loosening, and 1 hip was revised for acetabular osteolysis. Considering the complexity of the cases, this component has provided durable fixation and hip stability at this intermediate-term follow-up.     

The use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty is a disabling complication that can be difficult to treat and may not be amenable to nonoperative management. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome associated with the use of a constrained acetabular component as a salvage treatment for instability after hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcome of 110 arthroplasties, in 109 patients, that had been performed with use of a single design of constrained acetabular component. In seventy-nine hips the constrained component was implanted for the treatment of recurrent instability, and in thirty-one hips it was implanted because of absent or grossly deficient soft-tissue attachments that were believed to be associated with a high risk for subsequent instability. RESULTS: The constrained acetabular device eliminated or prevented hip instability in all patients except two, who continued to have sensations of subluxation. The mean Harris hip score improved significantly, from 62.7 points preoperatively to 76.4 points at the time of the latest follow-up (p < 0.0001). There were no instances of dislocation or disassembly of the hip components. Radiographic analysis revealed radiolucent lines around the cup in fifteen hips (14%). There was a total of nine revisions: six for deep infection, two for acetabular component loosening, and one for a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. CONCLUSIONS: A constrained acetabular component reliably restores and maintains hip stability in patients with recalcitrant recurrent instability and can dependably prevent dislocation in those who are at high risk because of absent or deficient soft tissues about the hip. However, because of the early appearance of radiolucent lines around some components and concerns about long-term fixation, the use of these devices should be reserved for situations in which other methods are inadequate or have already failed.     

Results of total hip reconstruction using acetabular mesh in patients with central acetabular deficiency

Fifty-three patients (54 hips) treated with cemented total hip reconstruction with the aid of an acetabular mesh made of Vitallium (Howmedica Inc., Rutherford, New Jersey), a cobalt-chrome molybdenum alloy, to reinforce the medial cement for deficient bone stock in the central acetabular region, were evaluated at an average follow-up period of 6.8 years (range, five to ten years). Thirty of these patients (30 hips) were treated with revision operations for either failed cup arthroplasty (ten hips), failed endoprosthesis (six hips), or failed total hip arthroplasty (14 hips) and presented difficult problems for acetabular reconstructions. Although none of the hips required reoperations for acetabular loosening, three patients showed roentgenographic evidence of acetabular component migration, and three others showed signs of impending failure of fixation of the acetabular component. The overall mean Harris hip rating improved from a mean of 43 points preoperatively to 87 points at follow-up evaluations. The extent of bone loss in the central acetabular region had the greatest influence on the results of acetabular fixation at the follow-up evaluation. None of the hips with intact medial acetabular cortex had roentgenographic evidence of failure of fixation, while 14% of the hips with medial cortical defects measuring less than 1 cm, and 75% of the hips with larger defects developed acetabular component loosening. The results of total hip reconstruction using acetabular mesh were unsatisfactory in patients with moderate or severe central acetabular bone loss and defects through the medial wall.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Omnifit acetabular component: a solution to preventing and treating dislocation

PURPOSE: To assess short- to medium-term outcome of the Omnifit constrained acetabular component in preventing dislocation in at-risk patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: 81 patients (mean age, 77 years) underwent either primary or revision THA with an Omnifit constrained acetabular component and were followed up clinically and radiologically for a mean period of 24 months. RESULTS: There was one dislocation and one revision for avulsion of the acetabulum. The remaining prostheses remained well fixed. CONCLUSIONS: In the short- to medium-term, the Omnifit constrained acetabular component is effective in preventing primary and recurrent dislocation in at-risk patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess whether good fixation is maintained. The Omnifit acetabular cup is recommended for elderly patients with limited life expectancy and functional demands.     

Acetabular revision using a total acetabular allograft

The most challenging aspect of an acetabular revision is the management of severe bone loss, which compromises implant fixation and stability. We present a case of failed acetabular revision with extensive bone loss (Paprosky Type 3b) in a 50-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis, which was treated using total acetabular allograft. At a follow-up of 1 year and 3 months, the allograft had united with the host bone. This is the first report of the use of a total acetabular allograft for revision total hip arthroplasty in India. The total acetabular allograft allows the placement of the component closer to the normal hip center, provides initial stability for the acetabular component, and restores bone stock to the host pelvis.     

Closed reduction of a dislocation of a constrained acetabular component

A constrained acetabular liner occasionally is used in management of chronic instability after total hip arthroplasty. If dislocation occurs out of a constrained liner, open reduction is indicated. A case is presented of closed reduction of a femoral component into a constrained liner.     

The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation

The poor results of surgical treatment of chronic instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA) led to the development of a constrained acetabular component. In this study, 87 constrained THAs implanted for recurrent instability were reviewed retrospectively. Eighty-five hips were available for follow-up evaluation, with an average follow-up period of 58 months. These 85 hips were evaluated at a minimum of 3 years. Two recurrent dislocations were seen, caused by dissociation of the liner from the shell. Four acetabular components and 1 femoral component were revised. Overall, a 2.4% dislocation rate and an 8.2% revision rate were seen. The recurrent dislocation rate of 2.4% represents a significant improvement over other methods reported. Repeat dislocation was only seen in dissociation of cemented liners into well-fixed shells. We do not recommend this mode of fixation.     

Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a well-accepted treatment for established hip arthritis following acetabular fractures. If a conservatively managed or operated case progresses to non-union/mal-union failing to restore the joint integrity, it may eventually develop secondary arthritis warranting a total hip arthroplasty. Also, in recent years, acute total hip arthroplasty is gaining importance in conditions where the fracture presents with pre-existing hip arthritis, is not amenable to salvage by open reduction and internal fixation, or, a poor prognosis is anticipated following fixation.There are several surgical challenges in performing total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures whether acute or delayed. As a separate entity elderly patients pose a distinct challenge due to osteoporosis and need stable fixation for early weight bearing alleviating the risk of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary complications and decubitus ulcer. The aim of surgery is to restore the columns for acetabular component implantation rather than anatomic fixation. Meticulous preoperative planning with radiographs and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, adequate exposure to delineate the fracture pattern, and, availability of an array of all instruments and possible implants as backup are the key points for success. Previous implants if any should be removed only if they are in the way of cup implantation or infected. Press fit uncemented modern porous metal acetabular component with multiple screw options is the preferred implant for majority of cases. However, complex fractures may require major reconstruction with revision THA implants especially when a pelvic discontinuity is present.     

Use of a constrained tripolar acetabular liner to treat intraoperative instability and postoperative dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a review of our experience

Constrained acetabular components have been used to treat certain cases of intraoperative instability and postoperative dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. We report our experience with a tripolar constrained component used in these situations since 1988. The outcomes of the cases where this component was used were analyzed for component failure, component loosening, and osteolysis. At average 10-year followup, for cases treated for intraoperative instability (2 cases) or postoperative dislocation (4 cases), the component failure rate was 6% (6 of 101 hips in 5 patients). For cases where the constrained liner was cemented into a fixed cementless acetabular shell, the failure rate was 7% (2 of 31 hips in 2 patients) at 3.9-year average followup. Use of a constrained liner was not associated with an increased osteolysis or aseptic loosening rate. This tripolar constrained acetabular liner provided total hip arthroplasty construct stability in most cases in which it was used for intraoperative instability or postoperative dislocation.     

Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a well-accepted treatment for established hip arthritis following acetabular fractures. If a conservatively managed or operated case progresses to non-union/mal-union failing to restore the joint integrity, it may eventually develop secondary arthritis warranting a total hip arthroplasty. Also, in recent years, acute total hip arthroplasty is gaining importance in conditions where the fracture presents with pre-existing hip arthritis, is not amenable to salvage by open reduction and internal fixation, or, a poor prognosis is anticipated following fixation.There are several surgical challenges in performing total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures whether acute or delayed. As a separate entity elderly patients pose a distinct challenge due to osteoporosis and need stable fixation for early weight bearing alleviating the risk of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary complications and decubitus ulcer. The aim of surgery is to restore the columns for acetabular component implantation rather than anatomic fixation. Meticulous preoperative planning with radiographs and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, adequate exposure to delineate the fracture pattern, and, availability of an array of all instruments and possible implants as backup are the key points for success. Previous implants if any should be removed only if they are in the way of cup implantation or infected. Press fit uncemented modern porous metal acetabular component with multiple screw options is the preferred implant for majority of cases. However, complex fractures may require major reconstruction with revision THA implants especially when a pelvic discontinuity is present.     

髋臼骨折后全髋关节置换术的初步临床结果

目的分析髋臼骨折术后全髋关节置换术的早期临床效果。方法2002年1月至2007年12月，共对18例髋臼骨折后创伤性髋关节关节炎的患者进行了全髋关节置换术，其中13例髋臼骨折做过切开复位内固定术，另5例行闭合复位骨牵引治疗；10例因为既往手术的疤痕粘连，关节置换时需行较广泛的软组织松解；9例在全髋关节置换术时仍有固定用的内植入物，5例术中需要取出内固定；12例术中用取下的股骨头行结构性或颗粒植骨；16例用非骨水泥髋臼，2例用金属加强环与骨水泥固定聚乙烯髋臼。术后随访行x线摄片评估，髋关节功能作Harris评分。结果随访时间6—70个月不等，平均38个月。3例术后发生髋关节周围BrookerⅡ度异位骨化，其中2例行异位骨化切除；1例术中股骨骨折，1例深部感染，1例髋臼松动并移位。最后随访时，12例（67％）患髋没有或仅偶有轻微疼痛，4例中度疼痛，2例疼痛需要助行工具；Harris评分由术前平均43．5分到术后平均84分。结论髋臼骨折后髋关节骨关节炎仍可通过全髋关节置换手术得到有效治疗，但其手术复杂程度与款臼骨折的处理有关，且并发症的发生率比一般的全髋关节置换手术高。     

Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty

Difficulty persists in consistently treating massive acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. A relatively new treatment option for these complex cases is a custom triflanged acetabular component created from anatomic data derived from a computed tomography scan of the pelvis. The custom triflanged acetabular component achieves fixation on the remaining ilium, ischium, and pubis with multiple fixation screws while the acetabular defect is filled with cancellous allograft bone. A retrospective review was done of 26 hips (26 patients) with massive periacetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type 3B) reconstructed with a custom triflanged acetabular component. Twenty-three of 26 patients (88.5%) were considered clinically successful at short-term followup (average, 54 months; range, 24 to 85 months), with stable fixation and reconstruction of periacetabular bone. Three failures occurred from loss of ischial fixation in two patients with a preoperative pelvic discontinuity and one patient with severe osteopenia. These devices should be used with caution in patients with a preoperative pelvic discontinuity unless additional column plating is done.     

Constrained acetabular cup disassembly

Dissociation of modular acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty has recently been reported. This case report describes two instances of polyethylene to metal dissociation with constrained polyethylene liners following total hip arthroplasty.     

Revision total hip: a novel modular cementless acetabular system for reconstruction of severe acetabular bone loss

Severe acetabular bone loss remains a challenge at the time of revision hip arthroplasty. A novel modular system is available to aid in the reconstruction of these challenging cases. This technique can provide support for an uncemented acetabular shell. By using the augments in combination with the revision acetabular component, the following goals of revision surgery on the acetabular side can be achieved at the time of surgery: initial stable fixation, restoration of the center of rotation, and maximization of host bone contact.     

Radiographic and clinical analysis of cementless acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty

Tofruetancloc nthisoitpnru sac.rttih oOrnorpig ltaiensctahylln y(i,qTuH emAa)jfoo irrs a Td HweteAelrli-o etrseatctaehbdnliiqs huheeidpsutilized bone cement for fixation,but loosening rate ofthe acetabular component was very high because ofbone cement tec…     

Catastrophic fracture of a stable metal acetabular component

Various modes of failure of primary and revision total hip arthroplasty have been well documented in the literature over the past 30 years. Concerns over polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and hypersensitivity reactions leading to component loosening and early revision have been evaluated and reported in the literature. Routine follow-up is important to monitor for postoperative issues that might lead to the subsequent need for revision.This article describes a case of a 64-year-old man who initially presented 11 years prior with an intertrochanteric fracture, which failed secondary to varus alignment and femoral head osteonecrosis. The fixation was converted to a total hip replacement using the S-ROM system (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana). Subsequently, the patient was lost to follow-up after primary total hip arthroplasty and presented with a catastrophic fracture of the metal acetabular cup system. The failure was suggested by clinical presentation and confirmed by imaging studies showing a fractured acetabular shell with femoral head prosthesis resting in the superolateral ileum. The contributing factors that resulted in mechanical failure were polyethylene wear and component fracture. The acetabular component was revised with an in-growth cementless trabecular metal multihole cup (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) with bone grafting of acetabular defects.Routine assessments help educate patients and allow careful monitoring by physicians while establishing a radiographic timeline for the identification, progression, or lack of postoperative complications.     

Survivorship of the native hip joint after percutaneous repair of acetabular fractures in the elderly

Our purpose was to examine survivorship of the native hip joint in patients ages 60 and over who underwent percutaneous reduction and fixation of acetabular fractures. A retrospective review at a University Level I Trauma Center was performed. Our institutional trauma database was reviewed. Patients aged 60 or older treated with percutaneous reduction and fixation of acetabular fractures between 1994 and 2007 were selected. 79 consecutive patients with 80 fractures were identified. Rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty were used to construct a Kaplan–Meier curve showing survivorship of the native hip joint after treatment. 75 fractures had adequate clinical follow-up with a mean of 3.9 years (range 0.5–11.9 years). Average blood loss was 69 cc and there were no postoperative infections. 19/75 (25%) were converted to total hip arthroplasty at a mean time of 1.4 years after the index procedure. Survivorship analysis demonstrated a cumulative survival of 65% at 11.9 years of follow-up. There were no conversions to arthroplasty beyond 4.7 years postoperatively. There were no statistically significant associations between conversion to arthroplasty and age, sex, closed vs. limited open reduction, and simple vs. complex fracture pattern. Percutaneous fixation is a viable treatment option for patients age 60 or greater with acetabular fractures. Rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty are comparable to open treatment methods and if conversion is required, soft tissues are preserved for future surgery.     

A novel technique for the removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components with spike fixation

The removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty can be challenging. The presence of spike fixation can increase the difficulty of removing an acetabular component because traditional methods of component removal, such as the use of curved gouges, may not be possible. We report a novel technique for the removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components with adjunctive spike fixation. This technique uses an overlay template that targets the spikes for removal with a high-speed, carbide-tipped bur.     

Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Although cementless acetabular components are routinely used in revision hip surgery, few investigators have evaluated the retention and efficacy of these components in the long term. In the current study, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of arthroplasties performed by one surgeon with a cementless acetabular component were assessed at a minimum of ten years. METHODS: From 1986 through 1988, sixty-one consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties were performed in fifty-five patients because of aseptic failure of one or both components of a prosthesis in which both components had been cemented. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-two hips) were alive at a mean of 12.9 years (range, 11.5 to 14.3 years) after the operation. In all of the patients, the acetabular component was revised to a porous-coated Harris-Galante component inserted without cement, and the femoral component was revised to an Iowa component affixed with contemporary cementing techniques. The hips were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a minimum of ten years subsequent to the index revision. No hips were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: None of the acetabular components required revision because of aseptic loosening. Two hips (3%) demonstrated radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. The polyethylene liner was exchanged during the follow-up period in eight hips. CONCLUSION: After a minimum of ten years of follow-up, cementless acetabular fixation in revision hip arthroplasty had produced durable results that were markedly better than those reported for acetabular fixation with cement.