Anal sphincter function and integrity after primary repair of third-degree tear: uncontrolled prospective analysis

Background: The purpose of the present paper was to determine the anatomical integrity and functional effect of a tear to the anal sphincter in women after vaginal delivery. Methods: A prospective review of third‐ and fourth‐degree vaginal tears over a 3 year period at Lyell McEwin and Queen Elizabeth Hospitals, Adelaide. Obstetric details were obtained from the records. All were counselled by a continence advisor and offered consultation with a colorectal surgeon. The integrity of the anal sphincter was assessed by endoanal ultrasound. Results: During the study period there were 6875 vaginal deliveries. There were 89 women (1.3%) who had a third‐ or fourth‐degree tear. Fifty‐one (57%) agreed to participate. Primiparity (67%), episiotomy (49%), forceps delivery (29%) and instrumental delivery were common in women sustaining a tear. Symptoms of anal incontinence (mild) or faecal urgency were described in 23 women (45%). Except for three women with an anovaginal fistula none required surgery for the management of faecal incontinence. A sphincter defect was seen in 27 women (53%) on endoanal ultrasound. The presence or absence of a sphincter defect was not significantly associated with symptoms but a trend was suggested (χ² = 3.21; P = 0.07). Conclusions: Third‐degree tear after vaginal delivery was a significant intrapartum event, yet associated only with minimal symptoms (excluding patients with anovaginal fistula) even in the presence of a sphincter defect on anal ultrasound.     

Results of repeat anal sphincter repair

BACKGROUND: Patients with a poor outcome from anterior sphincter repair may be candidates for dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter implantation or a secondary repair. This study examines the outcome of repeat overlap repairs in these patients. METHODS: Twenty-six of 235 patients undergoing a sphincter repair (median age 43 (range 23-63) years) underwent repeat repair from May 1994 to April 1997. Twenty-three patients were available for follow-up. Clinical evaluation included a satisfaction scale from 1 to 10, the patient's assessment of percentage improvement, ability to defer defaecation before and after operation, and Wexner continence scores before and after operation. Manometric studies were performed in 21 patients before and 17 patients after operation, and anal ultrasonography was undertaken in 17 patients before and 14 patients after operation. External sphincter defects were present on all preoperative scans. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 20 (range 5-42) months, 15 patients felt that they were 50 per cent or more improved after operation. On the satisfaction scale of 1-10 the median score was 7 (range 1-10). There was a significant improvement in the Wexner continence score from 19 (range 17-20) before operation to 12 (range 1-20) after operation (P < 0.001). Ability to defer defaecation improved significantly from less than 5 min in all patients before operation to greater than 15 min in six patients after operation. Ultrasonography showed good overlap of the external sphincter muscle in eight of 14 patients. All patients who failed to improve showed a residual defect on ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: Repeat anterior repair produces a significant improvement in continence score and ability to defer defaecation in patients with obstetric sphincter damage. Clinical improvement correlates closely with an improvement in the appearance on endoanal ultrasonography.     

Early results of immediate repair of obstetric third-degree tears: 65% are completely asymptomatic despite persistent sphincter defects in 61%

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of immediate repair of obstetric third-degree tears is poorly documented. Immediate repair may give better functional results than delayed repair because scarring is reduced. This aim of this prospective study was to examine the early outcome of immediate repair of third-degree tears. METHOD: A total of 121 women who had immediate repair of obstetric third-degree tears underwent interview, anal ultrasonography and anorectal physiology. RESULTS: At review, 79 (65%) were completely asymptomatic (score = 0), 23 (19%), had minor flatus incontinence or mild urgency causing no compromise to their quality of life (score 1-4), and 19 (16%) had clinically embarrassing faecal incontinence (score 5-24). Thirty-nine (32%) had an intact internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) (i.e. a successful repair), eight (7%) had a defect in the IAS alone but the EAS was intact (i.e. a successful repair but a residual IAS defect), 43 (35%) had a residual defect in the EAS alone (IAS intact) and 31 (26%) had a persistent defect in the IAS and EAS. Residual defects in either or both of the sphincters were associated with a significantly higher incidence of abnormal resting and squeeze anal pressures. Anal manometry had no correlation with symptoms. The highest proportion of severe incontinence was in those with an IAS defect alone (37%) and when there was a residual IAS and EAS defect (24%). Only 2 of 39 (5%) with an intact IAS and EAS had severe incontinence and only 8 of 43 (18%) with a residual EAS defect alone had severe faecal incontinence. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a good outcome following immediate repair of third-degree obstetric tears and emphasize the role of the IAS in providing continence.     

Anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence symptoms after repair of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations in primiparous women

A study was carried out to identify (1) incidence of anal incontinence symptoms, (2) incidence and size of both external anal sphincter (EAS) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) defects, and (3) relationship between anal incontinence symptoms and IAS or EAS defect size after repair of an obstetric anal sphincter laceration. Forty-seven vaginally primiparous women underwent obstetric anal sphincter laceration repair. At 8–12 weeks postpartum, anal incontinence symptoms were assessed, and endoanal ultrasound was performed. At 1–2 years postpartum, symptoms were reassesseds. The incidence of anal incontinence symptoms at 8–12 weeks was 43%. The incidence of IAS and EAS defects were 32% and 77%, respectively. IAS defects ≥45 degrees were predictive of symptoms (p = 0.02). After 18 months mean follow-up, 11% reported chronic symptoms. After anal sphincter laceration repair, anal incontinence symptoms occur in 43% of women and remain chronic in 11%. Anal incontinence symptoms are associated with increasing IAS defect size. Poster presentation at the American Urogynecologic Society Annual Meeting, Hollywood, Florida, USA, 27–29 September 2007.     

Primary repair of advanced obstetric anal sphincter tears: should it be performed by the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique?

Advanced obstetric anal sphincter tears are often associated with a high incidence of fecal and flatus incontinence. We aimed to assess the clinical outcome of these repairs when done by the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum. Between August 2005 and December 2006, all grades 3 and 4 obstetric anal sphincter tears in our department were repaired by a reconstructive pelvic surgeon, primarily using the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum. All women were followed every 6 months using the Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire, a physical examination of the anal sphincter, anal manometry, and transperineal anal sonography. There were 3,478 deliveries of which 22 (0.63%) anal sphincter tears were repaired in women aged 22-41 years. Two women were diagnosed with Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists grade 3a, eight with grade 3b, nine with grade 3c, and three with grade 4 anal sphincter tears. Postoperatively, 21 patients attended the outpatient clinic, with an average follow-up time of 9.2+/-1.4 months. Only two women (9.5%) complained of flatus incontinence and fecal urgency and had mildly decreased anal sphincter squeeze pressure and a small sonographic anal sphincter defect. None of the women complained of fecal incontinence. Two women (9.5%) reported on transient perineal pain and one (4.8%) on transient dyspareunia. All other women were asymptomatic and had normal anal manometry and sonographic evaluation. Repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears using the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum seems to carry favorable clinical outcome and reduced risk for anal incontinence, perineal pain, and sexual dysfunction.     

Fecal incontinence following anal sphincter rupture: influence of the aetiology on the repair results

Short-term functional results are usually good after sphincter repair but they could deteriorate with time if the disruption is due to obstetric damage. The aim of this study was to compare short and long-term results after sphincter repair according to the etiology of the damage. METHODS: Fifty-five women have been operated on for a sphincter disruption due to obstetrical damage (Ob) (28) or to postoperative damage (Op) (27) and were retrospectively studied. Surgical procedure was similar for every patients but the puborectalis muscle was also approximated in case of obstetric damage. Functional results were recorded by clinical examinations two months after the operation and during the year 2001. RESULTS: The two groups were similar, except for the rate of defunctionning stoma undergone and for the duration of symptoms before the operation. Mortality and morbidity were similar between the two groups. Short-term functional results were better in the postoperative group (96 vs 78%) (P =0.05). At the end of the follow-up the results remained significantly better in group Op (85 vs 65%; P <0.05). The cumulative rates of functional good results also decreased more rapidly in group Ob but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: Short and long-time functional results after sphincter repair seem to be better in case of postoperative disruption. Pudendal nerve damages frequently observed after traumatic delivery could explain this difference.     

Complications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation

BACKGROUND: The postoperative complications and functional outcome following 24 consecutive implantations of an artificial anal sphincter were assessed prospectively. METHODS: A total of 24 artificial anal sphincters (Acticon Neosphincter) were implanted in 22 patients (mean age 47 years). The mean follow-up period was 28 (range 6-48) months. Results were assessed prospectively by two independent observers at 4-month intervals. The cumulative probability of artificial anal sphincter removal was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Five patients were free of complications. During the postoperative period, complications occurred in nine patients, two of whom required reoperation. During follow-up, complications developed in ten patients, nine of whom were reoperated. Definitive device explantation was necessary in seven patients. The cumulative probability of device explantation was 44 per cent at 48 months. The 15 patients with functioning implants were followed up for a mean of 26 (range 7-48) months. Continence grading improved from a mean of 18 (range 14-20) in the preoperative period to 4 (range 0-14) after operation (P < 0.001). Resting anal canal pressure in patients with a functioning implant increased from a mean of 35 (range 8-87) mmHg before operation to 54 (range 34-70) mmHg after implantation (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An artificial anal sphincter is a useful alternative for refractory faecal incontinence but the incidence of late postoperative complications is high.     

Rectocele and anal sphincter defect - surgical anatomy and combined repair

This study reports on the surgical anatomy and technique of perineal repair in a selected group of parous women with faecal incontinence and/or difficulty in evacuation. Anal sphincter muscle damage is usually attributed to childbirth, although most of these women present for the first time years later. Consecutive patients with the above symptoms were examined clinically and then investigated with a perineal ultrasound scan. During the perineal operation for repair, further investigation by transillumination and measurements with calipers were done in 50 patients. All patients received routine postoperative care, and were followed up for at least 6 months. From 1995 to 2009 a total of 117 patients, all female, underwent perineal repair by a single surgeon. The age range was 24 - 82 years. In the last 50 consecutive patients, transillumination was positive prior to repair in all, and negative after. The average thickness of the rectocele wall was 2.4 mm prior to repair and 4.8 mm after. In all patients a rectocele was found in conjunction with the anal sphincter defect. The results of combined repair were satisfactory in 109 of 117 patients (93%). A rectocele consists of rectal mucosa, and represents a pulsion diverticulum of the lower anterior rectum. The mucosa herniates through a defect in the midline in the lower anterior rectal muscle wall. This defect then extends into the internal and external anal sphincters. It is a consistent finding in women with faecal incontinence due to anal sphincter disruption. If the anterior rectal muscle wall is repaired first, anal sphincter repair is facilitated.     

The prevalence of anal incontinence in post-partum women following obstetrical anal sphincter injury

Introduction and hypothesis  

The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of anal incontinence (AI) in post-partum women following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI). We also assessed quality of life and prevalence of other pelvic floor symptoms.     

Long‐term anal continence and quality of life following postpartum anal sphincter injury

Objective Anal incontinence occurs as a result of damage to pelvic floor and the anal sphincter. In women, vaginal delivery has been recognized as the primary cause. To date, figures quoted for overt third degree anal sphincter tear vary between 0% and 26.9% of all vaginal deliveries and the prevalence of anal incontinence following primary repair vary between 15% and 61%. Our aim was to analyse the long‐term (minimum 10 years post primary repair) anorectal function and quality of life in a cohort of women who suffered a third degree tear (Group 1) and compare the results with a cohort of women who underwent an uncomplicated vaginal delivery (Group 2) or an elective caesarean delivery (Group 3). Method In all, 107 patients who suffered a third degree tear between 1981 and 1993 were contacted with a validated questionnaire. The two control groups comprised of 125 patients in each category. Those who responded to the questionnaire were invited for anorectal physiology studies and endoanal ultrasound. Results Of the total number contacted, 54, 71 and 54 women from the three groups returned the completed questionnaire. In the three groups, a total of 28 (53%), 13 (19%) and six (11%) complained of anal incontinence (P < 0.0001) respectively. Comparison of quality of life scores between the groups showed a poorer quality of life in those who suffered a tear (P < 0.0001). In addition, in spite of primary repair, 13 (59%) patients in group 1 showed a persistent sphincter defect compared to one (4%) occult defect in Group 2 and none in Group 3. Conclusion Our study indicates that long‐term results of primary repair are not encouraging. It therefore emphasizes the importance of primary prevention and preventing further sphincter damage in those who have already suffered an injury (during subsequent deliveries).     

Anterior anal sphincter repair: results in a district general hospital

OBJECTIVE: Previous series have evaluated the overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair, but with short-term follow-up and a wide range of results. We assessed our results of the anterior sphincter repair in patients with faecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent an anterior anal sphincter repair between October 1994 and July 1999. In 12 of the patients, a polypropylene mesh was inserted in the repair to act as re-inforcement. Pre-operatively, all patients had an anterior anal sphincter defect diagnosed with endo-anal ultrasound. Clinical evaluation included the patient's assessment of improvement and the Cleveland Clinic Continence Score before and after surgery. Manometric studies were performed pre-operatively and a median time of 11.5 mouths postoperatively. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 3-61 months), 16 out of 20 (80%) patients said that surgery had improved their symptoms. There was a significant improvement in the continence score from 14 (range, 4-15) before operation to 7 (range, 0-15) after operation (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in mean anal sphincter length, mean resting and maximum squeeze anal canal pressures before and after surgery. Similar results were obtained in patients with and without mesh re-inforcement. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, the overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair is successful in relieving symptoms in patients with faecal incontinence due to an anterior sphincter defect. This improvement, however, is not associated with any significant changes in anorectal manometric parameters.     

Multiple aortic tears treated by primary suture repair

Blunt trauma to the chest with aortic tear is not an unusual sequela of rapid deceleration. Multiple aortic tears in a viable patient are unusual. A case is reported where multiple aortic lacerations were repaired without the use of prosthetic material. The use of a primary suture repair of aortic injuries is advocated for simple aortic tears not extending proximally to the arch whether they be single or multiple.     

Combined sphincter repair and postanal repair for the treatment of complicated injuries to the anal sphincters.

The management of seven patients with multiple injuries to the anal sphincter musculature and its nerve supply, from major pelvic trauma, anal fistula surgery, or obstetric trauma, was reviewed. All were either incontinent of solid stools or had defunctioning colostomies. Anal manometry was abnormal in all patients. Concentric needle electromyography (EMG) showed anterior division of the external sphincter in all the patients; five also had posterior division of both the external sphincter and puborectalis. EMG abnormalities were found in the lateral quadrants of these muscles, particularly the external sphincter. Single fibre needle EMG showed evidence of reinnervation in the external sphincter in six patients, and in the puborectalis in two, indicating partial denervation of the muscles. Treatment was by anterior sphincter repair using an overlapping technique, combined with postanal repair; the repairs were protected by a defunctioning colostomy. When assessed 4-60 months (mean 17 months) after colostomy closure all seven patients were continent of solid and semi-formed stools, but had urgency of defaecation. None could control liquid stool or flatus. After complicated sphincter injuries planned surgical reconstruction, based on EMG assessment of the sphincter muscles, can restore acceptable continence.     

Colorectal neurovasculature and anal sphincter

The varied blood supply of the colon and rectum has been described. It may be stated that the efficiency of any surgeon's hand is primarily dependent on the knowledge that guides it. Significant anatomic facts are described herein. An important blood supply to the terminal ileum comes from the generally unknown ileal artery, which, when absent, creates a critical, poorly vascularized area and thus an inappropriate area for an anastomosis. This right colic artery may be absent in 2 per cent. It may arise in common with the middle colic trunk (52 per cent). The middle colic artery is absent in 3 per cent. It occurs as a separate branch in 44 per cent and may be derived from celiac artery rarely. The inferior mesenteric artery divides into the left colic, which ascends to the splenic flexure, and a descending branch that continues downward as the superior rectal artery. The left colic artery may not reach the splenic flexure. The marginal artery may be interrupted or weakly represented at the splenic flexure. Therefore, one should perform a ligation of the left colic vessel before its bifurcation if the splenic flexure is to be preserved. The superior rectal artery is the main blood supply of the rectum. Its branching on the rectum is varied, but it has a rich anastomosis with the other rectal arteries, namely, the middle rectal and inferior rectal arteries. Sudeck's point is not critical. The middle rectal artery varies in number and origin and is not essential provided the inferior rectal artery is intact. The anatomy of the anal canal is described. The rectum is for a short distance surrounded by the anal canal with the external sphincter. The internal sphincter is the end of circular muscle of the rectum. The external sphincter can be thought of as one continuous muscle divided by longitudinal bands into three main parts: subcutaneous, superficial, and deep. Below the pectinate line in the anal canal, the nerve supply, lymphatic drainage, blood supply, and epithelium are different from that in the rectum.     

External anal sphincter repair using the overlapping technique in patients with anal incontinence and concomitant pudendal nerve damage

BACKGROUND: No single surgical technique has so far emerged as the optimal approach to treat defects of the anal sphincter in patients with postpartum fecal incontinence. Our approach is to repair the external sphincter using the overlapping technique to optimize morphological and clinical outcome. The results were correlated with preoperatively determined pudendal nerve function. METHODS: Thirty-five patients were followed up for three years after repair of the external anal sphincter. The patients had grade 2 (n = 29) or grade 3 (n = 6) fecal incontinence. Nineteen (54 %) patients had a concomitant defect of the internal anal sphincter and 28 (80 %) had abnormal pelvic floor EMG findings. Before surgery, all patients underwent conservative treatment with biofeedback and electrostimulation. The muscle ends were overlapped with Vicryl 4-0 sutures. A standardized protocol was used for the perioperative management in all patients. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients who underwent overlapping repair of the external anal sphincter, 32 (91 %) had a satisfactory result at 3-year follow-up based on sonomorphological criteria. These 32 patients were continent for solid and liquid stools. Six of the 35 patients (17 %) continued to have flatus incontinence. Two (6 %) patients were improved and one patient (3 %) had unchanged incontinence. Pudendal nerve damage had no effect on the outcome of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings at 3-year follow-up show good results for the overlapping repair of the external anal sphincter in terms of morphology and clinical symptoms. This outcome depends on an adequate preoperative pelvic floor conditioning, optimal perioperative management, and use of a standardized operative technique. Surgical repair of the morphological defect is recommended even in patients with pudendal nerve damage.