Double-Blind Dose Reduction Study of Vigabatrin in Complex Partial Epilepsy

Seventy-five epilepsy patients with at least two complex partial seizures/month were treated with gamma-vinyl GABA (GVG) 3 g/day for 3 months. Forty-one patients (54%) showed a reduction of greater than or equal to 50% in seizures. The median monthly seizure frequency decreased from 11.5 to 4 seizures/month. Twenty percent of patients had an improvement in general performance without a significant reduction in seizures. The responders entered the second phase of the study, in which 28 patients were randomly allocated to 3 g/day and 25 patients to 1.5 g/day GVG under double-blind conditions. The dosage of 3 g/day appeared to be clearly more effective than 1.5 g/day. However, even with 1.5 g/day GVG the seizure frequency was significantly reduced as compared to baseline. Drowsiness was the most commonly observed side effect, and it diminished with continued treatment. In three cases side effects led to the withdrawal of GVG therapy.     

Dose-dependent safety and efficacy of zonisamide: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with refractory partial seizures

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zonisamide (ZNS) as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory localization-related epilepsy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive ZNS in 351 patients with refractory partial seizures receiving a stable regimen of one to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Patients were randomized to placebo or ZNS, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 500 mg/day (2:1:1:2) after a 12-week baseline. Dose titration was undertaken over a 6-week titration phase, which was followed by an 18-week fixed-dose assessment phase. Primary efficacy parameters were the differences between ZNS, 500 mg/day, and placebo in the change from baseline in frequency of complex partial (CP) seizures during the fixed-dose assessment phase and in the proportion of CP responders (> or =50% decrease from baseline in seizure frequency). Safety and tolerability also were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the highest dose of ZNS (500 mg/day) resulted in a significantly greater decrease in CP seizure frequency from baseline (51.2% vs. 16.3%; p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher proportion of CP responders (52.3% vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001). Both ZNS, 500 mg/day, and 300 mg/day were statistically superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of "all seizures" and simple partial (SP) + CP seizures. For all seizures, a significant dose-response relation was observed (p < 0.0001).The most common adverse events were somnolence, headache, dizziness, and nausea during the titration phase and headache and pharyngitis during the fixed-dose assessment phase. CONCLUSIONS: ZNS provides dose-dependent, effective, and generally well-tolerated adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.     

Felbamate Monotherapy: Implications for Antiepileptic Drug Development

Summary: We studied the effect of felbamate (FBM) monotherapy on seizure rate in patients with partial and secondarily generalized seizures undergoing presurgical monitoring at a single site. The study design was a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel monotherapy trial. Forty patients whose seizures had not been controlled by standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were randomized. Seizure type was confirmed by video-EEG monitoring. All baseline AEDs were discontinued, and patients were drug-free for 5.3 ± 2.4 days before randomization to FBM or placebo. After a 4-day titration, seizures were counted for 14 days. Patients receiving FBM had significantly lower seizure rates, whether all randomized patients, patients who survived titration, or study completers were compared. Eight of 19 placebo patients randomized to placebo, as compared with 13 of 21 receiving FBM, completed the 18-day study. Two FBM patients dropped out due to seizures, and 6 dropped out due to side effects, including anxiety, difficulty sleeping, abdominal discomfort, acute psychosis, and orobuccal dyskinesias. Ten placebo patients met the criteria for premature discontinuation owing to seizures, and 1 had an episode of panic. There was no evidence of hepatic or hematologic toxicity. FBM reduces seizure frequency in patients with localization-related epilepsy.     

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam 3000 mg/d in patients with refractory partial seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, responder-selected study evaluating monotherapy. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy in selected patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, responder-selected study, patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive oral LEV 1500 mg twice daily or placebo during a 12-week add-on phase. Treatment responders (patients with a reduction in partial seizure frequency of 50% or more compared with baseline) entered a monotherapy phase that included a maximum 12-week down-titration period and 12 weeks of monotherapy at 1500 mg twice daily. In both phases, responder rate, seizure frequency, and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients (placebo, n = 105; LEV, n = 181) entered the add-on phase, and 86 patients (placebo, n = 17; LEV, n = 69) were eligible for the monotherapy phase. Thirty-six of 181 patients (19.9%) who received LEV completed the entire study compared with only 10 of 105 patients (9.5%) in the placebo group (p = 0.029). The odds of completing the study on LEV were 2.36 times (95% confidence interval, 1.08, 5.57) higher than on placebo. The responder rate during the add-on phase was significantly higher in the LEV group compared with the placebo group (42.1% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the LEV monotherapy group, the median percent reduction in partial seizure frequency compared with baseline was 73.8% (p = 0.037), with a responder rate of 59.2%. Nine patients (18.4%) remained seizure-free on LEV monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to LEV monotherapy (1500 mg twice daily) is effective and well tolerated in patients with refractory partial seizures who responded to 3000 mg/d LEV as add-on therapy.     

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Vigabatrin (Gamma-Vinyl GABA) in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Vigabatrin (GVG) (3 g/day) and placebo were compared as an add-on to standard therapy in therapy-resistant epileptic patients using a double-blind crossover design with randomized treatment allocation. Twenty-three patients entered the trial, with four dropping out due to either increased seizure frequency following the cross-over from GVG to placebo (n = 1), intolerance to GVG therapy (n = 2), or poor seizure record (n = 1). Of the 19 patients who completed the study, 17 had partial seizures, eight of whom had secondary generalization and two who had primary generalized seizures. Compared with placebo, GVG was associated with a significant reduction in seizure frequency (p less than 0.01), with 11 of 19 patients experiencing greater than 50% reduction in weekly seizure occurrence, two showing a 25-50% reduction, four unchanged, and two showing an increase in seizures. Global efficacy ratings were greater in the GVG period for 15 patients (p less than 0.05) compared with one in whom there was no period difference and two in whom ratings were higher in the placebo period. Fourteen of the 19 patients indicated a preference for the GVG period. Adverse effects observed during GVG treatment were generally mild and consisted of drowsiness, confusion, nausea, irritability, and constipation. No clinically significant alterations in laboratory test results were observed. No treatment-related changes in plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs were noted. These results confirm the antiepileptic efficacy of oral GVG in refractory epileptics.     

左乙拉西坦添加治疗对难治性部分性癫(癎)患者生活质量影响的研究

目的:评价新型抗癫药物左乙拉西坦(Lev)作为添加治疗对难治性部分性癫患者生活质量的影响。方法:43例确诊有癫部分性发作的成年患者随机分为两组:Lev治疗组与安慰剂组,Lev治疗16周后比较两组的有效率和不良反应,并用QOLIE-31量表对两组癫患者进行生活质量评定,所有患者在转入Lev开放性治疗6个月后再次进行QOLIE评估。结果:16周治疗期末Lev组癫部分性发作的治疗有效率明显高于安慰剂组,两组不良反应的发生率相当;Lev组生活质量明显高于安慰剂组,两组患者转入开放性治疗6个月后,生活质量均显著改善。结论:Lev作为添加用药治疗成人难治性部分性癫发作,显著减少发作频率、安全耐受性较好,能够提高癫患者的生活质量。     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of rufinamide as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures

Purpose: Efficacy and safety of adjunctive rufinamide (3,200 mg/day) was assessed in adolescents and adults with inadequately controlled partial‐onset seizures receiving maintenance therapy with up to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multicenter study comprised a 56‐day baseline phase (BP), 12‐day titration phase, and 84‐day maintenance phase (MP). The primary efficacy variable was percentage change in total partial seizure frequency per 28 days (MP vs. BP). Secondary efficacy outcome measures included ≥50% responder rate and reduction in mean total partial seizure frequency during the MP. Safety and tolerability evaluation included adverse events (AEs), physical and neurologic examinations, and laboratory values. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted. Results: Three hundred fifty‐seven patients were randomized: 176 to rufinamide and 181 to placebo. Patients had a median of 13.3 seizures per 28 days during BP; 86% were receiving ≥2 AEDs. For the intent‐to‐treat population, the median percentage reduction in total partial seizure frequency per 28 days was 23.25 for rufinamide versus 9.80 for placebo (p = 0.007). Rufinamide‐treated patients were more than twice as likely to have had a ≥50% reduction in partial seizure frequency (32.5% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.001) and had a greater reduction in median total partial seizure rate per 28 days during the MP (13.2 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Treatment‐emergent AEs occurring at ≥5% higher incidence in the rufinamide group compared with placebo were dizziness, fatigue, nausea, somnolence, and diplopia. Conclusions: Adjunctive treatment with rufinamide reduced total partial seizures in refractory patients. AEs reported were consistent with the known tolerability profile of rufinamide.     

Tiagabine: Efficacy and Safety in Adjunctive Treatment of Partial Seizures

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of tiagabine (TGB), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: This response-dependent study used an open-label screening phase (in which patients were titrated to their optimal TGB dose, < or =64 mg/day) followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase. Initial eligibility criteria included (a) seizures inadequately controlled by existing AEDs, and (b) six or more partial seizures during an 8-week baseline period. Patients showing benefit from TGB (> or =25% reduction in total seizure rate relative to baseline) were eligible for randomization into the double-blind phase, which comprised two 7-week assessment periods separated by a 3-week crossover period. RESULTS: Forty-four (50%) of the 88 enrolled patients entered the double-blind phase of the study during which there were significant reductions compared with placebo in all partial (p < 0.01), complex partial (p < 0.001), and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizure rates (p < 0.05). Thirty-three percent of patients experienced a reduction of > or =50% in the all partial seizure rate. Eight (22%) patients receiving TGB during the double-blind phase reported adverse events, of which dizziness and incoordination were the most frequent. Three patients withdrew from treatment during the double-blind phase because of adverse events; two during treatment with TGB and one during treatment with placebo. TGB did not affect plasma concentrations of other coadministered AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: TGB was significantly better than placebo in terms of seizure rate reduction and was generally well-tolerated in patients with difficult to control seizures.     

Stiripentol in childhood partial epilepsy: randomized placebo-controlled trial with enrichment and withdrawal design

Stiripentol, a new antiepileptic drug inhibiting cytochrome P450-enzymes, suggested some efficacy when combined with carbamazepine in an open trial in refractory partial epilepsy of childhood. Our objective was to test these results in a placebo-controlled trial. To limit the number of patients included, we used an enrichment and withdrawal design. Among the 67 children entered in a 4-month open add-on stiripentol study following a 1-month single-blind placebo baseline, the 32 responders were randomized for 2 months either to continue stiripentol (n = 17) or to withdraw to placebo (n = 15). If seizures increased by at least 50% after randomization compared with baseline, the patients dropped out (primary end point): there were six patients on stiripentol and eight patients on placebo (not significant). However, a decrease in seizure frequency compared with baseline (secondary end point) was greater on stiripentol (-75%) than on placebo (-22%) (P < .025). Twelve patients experienced at least one adverse event on stiripentol (71%) compared with four patients on placebo (27%); none were reported as severe. The combination of stiripentol and carbamazepine proved to reduce seizure frequency in children with refractory partial epilepsy, although it failed to show a significant impact according to the escape criteria selected as the primary end point in the present study, for ethical reasons.     

Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Partial Seizures: 1. A Controlled Study of Effect on Seizures

Summary: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was shown to reduce seizure frequency in refractory epilepsy patients in two pilot studies. Based on these results, a multicenter, prospectively randomized, parallel, double-blind study of patients with refractory partial seizures was initiated. After a 12–week baseline period, identical vagus nerve stimulators were implanted and patients randomized to either a high or low 14–week VNS treatment paradigm. The primary objective was to demonstrate that high VNS (therapeutic parameters) was more effective in reducing partial seizure frequency than was low VNS (less or noneffective parameters). Patients continued receiving antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with plasma concentrations held constant throughout the study. We report results of the first 67 patients to exit the 14-week acute phase. After 14 weeks of VNS, 31 patients receiving high VNS experienced a mean seizure frequency percentage reduction of 30.9%, which was statistically significant as compared with the mean seizure frequency percentage reduction of 11.3% in 36 patients receiving low VNS (p = 0.029, t test; p = 0.036, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). In addition to the significant intra group p-values, mean seizure frequency percentage change reached statistical significance for high VNS (p < 0.001) but not low VNS (p = 0.072) as compared with baseline. Twelve of 31 (38.7%) patients receiving high VNS achieved at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency whereas 7 of 36 (19.4%) patients receiving low VNS experienced at least 50% reduction after 14 weeks. The implant procedure and VNS therapy were well tolerated. Our study confirmed the effectiveness of VNS as treatment for epilepsy patients with refractorypartial seizures.     

Efficacy and safety of oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide when added to 1 or 2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, and assess plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs to determine any potential for drug interactions. METHODS: During this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients were randomized to placebo or lacosamide 200, 400, or 600 mg/day after an 8-week baseline period. Lacosamide was titrated in weekly increments of 100 mg/day over 6 weeks and maintained for 12 weeks. Results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Four hundred eighteen patients were randomized and received trial medication; 312 completed the trial. The median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days was 10%, 26%, 39%, and 40% in the placebo, lacosamide 200, 400, and 600 mg/day treatment groups, respectively. The median percent reduction in seizure frequency over placebo was significant for lacosamide 400 mg/day (p=0.0023) and 600 mg/day (p=0.0084). The 50% responder rates were 22%, 33%, 41%, and 38% for placebo, lacosamide 200, 400, and 600 mg/day, respectively. The 50% responder rate over placebo was significant for lacosamide 400 mg/day (p=0.0038) and 600 mg/day (p=0.0141). Adverse events that appeared dose-related included dizziness, nausea, fatigue, ataxia, vision abnormal, diplopia, and nystagmus. Lacosamide did not affect mean plasma concentrations of concomitantly administered AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, adjunctive lacosamide significantly reduced seizure frequency in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Along with favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles, these results support further development of lacosamide as an AED.     

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究唑尼沙胺添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性

目的 评价唑尼沙胺(ZNS)作为添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性.方法 采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、添加治疗设计.240例确诊为癫(癎)部分性发作的受试者按照1:1的比例随机分配到ZNS治疗组或安慰剂组.在前4周加鼋期内受试者自100 mg/d逐渐加量至300 mg/d,随后进入12周的稳定治疗期.在稳定期内可根据患者情况酌情减量,或加量至最大剂量400 mg/d.有效性评价的主要指标为稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线值减少百分数的中位值,重要的次要评价指标为有效率,即部分性癫(癎)发作次数减少≥50%者的比例.同时对药物的安全性进行评价.结果 ZNS组受试者稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线期减少百分数(48.4%)显著高于安慰剂组(26.6%),组间差异有统计学意义(F=4.904,P=0.028);ZNS组治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效率(48.6%)高于安慰剂组(34.9%),差异有统计学意义(X2=4.046,P=0.044),其中以复杂部分性癫(癎)的组间差异最为显著(分别为52.2%和33.3%,X2=5.607,P=0.018).ZNS组与安慰剂组不良事件发生率相当,与ZNS相关的不良事件多为头晕、头痛、嗜睡、食欲下降、恶心等.结论 ZNS能有效治疗部分性癫(癎),降低癫(癎)发作频率,对复杂部分性癫(癎)发作治疗效果尤为突出.ZNS耐受性良好,受试者用药安全性较高.     

Pregabalin add-on treatment in patients with partial seizures: a novel evaluation of flexible-dose and fixed-dose treatment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregabalin as add-on therapy for patients with partial seizures administered as fixed dose or as flexible dose adjusted to optimal seizure reduction and tolerability. METHODS: Patients receiving antiepileptic drugs (98.8% between 1 and 3 AEDs; 1.2% on more than 3 AEDs) and experiencing > or =4 partial seizures during the 6-week baseline period and no 4-week seizure-free interval were randomized (1:2:2) to placebo (n = 73), pregabalin fixed dose (600 mg/day BID; n = 137), or pregabalin flexible dose (n = 131; 150 and 300 mg/day for 2 weeks each; 450 and 600 mg/day for 4 weeks each, BID) for 12 weeks. Dosage could be adjusted based on tolerability and maintained when a 4-week seizure-free period was achieved. Primary efficacy parameter was reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. RESULTS: Both pregabalin regimens significantly reduced seizure frequency compared with placebo, by 35.4%, for flexible dose (p = 0.0091) and 49.3% for fixed dose (p = 0.0001) versus 10.6% for placebo, and the fixed-dose group was superior to the flexible-dose group (p = 0.0337). Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 6.8% (placebo), 12.2% (pregabalin flexible dose), and 32.8% (pregabalin fixed dose). Patients receiving pregabalin fixed dose discontinued due to adverse event earlier than other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin administered twice daily, either as fixed (600 mg/day), or as flexible (150-600 mg/day) dose, was highly effective and generally well-tolerated as add-on therapy for partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. Lower incidence of adverse events and discontinuations were achieved in patients receiving pregabalin when dosing was individualized to optimize efficacy and tolerability.     

Double-Blind Crossover Trial of Progabide Versus Placebo in Severe Epilepsies

In this double-blind, two-period, crossover trial with randomized treatment assignment, progabide (+/- 30 mg/kg/day) and placebo were compared as add-on to standard therapy in 20 "therapy-resistant" epileptic patients (11 males, nine females; age range, 7-47 years). The duration of each treatment period was 6 weeks. Crossover was performed gradually over 3-4 days. Twenty-four patients entered the study: three dropped out for reasons unrelated to progabide effects; one dropped out during the placebo period because of increased seizure frequency. Of the 20 patients who completed the study, 14 had partial, two partial plus secondary generalized, and four generalized seizures. Preexisting antiepileptic treatment consisted of one antiepileptic drug (AED) in three, two AEDs in eight, three AEDs in five, and four AEDs in four patients (mean, 2.5 AEDs/patient). The following parameters were recorded at biweekly intervals: (a) efficacy parameters--total seizure count, counts of each seizure type, and global clinical judgment; (b) safety parameters--adverse drug effects, brief clinical and neurological examinations, and laboratory tests; and (c) plasma concentrations of progabide and of the associated AEDs. Twelve patients were considered to be improved (p less than 0.01) with progabide by global clinical judgment compared with two patients improved with placebo. Nine patients of 20 had a 48-100% reduction of total seizure count in the verum period, leading to a significant reduction of total seizure number and of complex partial seizures in the verum period as compared with the placebo period (p less than 0.05). Adverse effects were reported or observed in 10 patients during the progabide period and in five patients in the placebo period. The side effects were generally mild and consisted of somnolence in four cases and of tremors, dry mouth, troubles of equilibrium, anorexia, euphoria, depression, and anxiety in individual patients; a 15-20% reduction of the progabide dose was required in two cases only. No treatment-related alterations in results of laboratory tests were observed.     

Randomised, placebo-controlled study of vigabatrin as first-line treatment of infantile spasms

PURPOSE: Vigabatrin (VGB) has been shown to be an effective drug in the treatment of infantile spasms (West syndrome) in predominantly retrospective and open but also in prospective studies. This prospective, randomised, and placebo-controlled trial of VGB in infantile spasms was considered to be justified and feasible to confirm or refute these previous findings. METHODS: Forty children with newly diagnosed infantile spasms received either VGB or placebo for 5 days in a double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, after which all the infants continuing in the study were treated openly with VGB for a minimum of 24 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, at the end of the double-blind phase, the patients treated with VGB had a 78% (95% confidence interval, 55-89%) reduction in spasms compared with 26% (-56-65%) in the group treated with placebo (p = 0.020). Seven VGB-treated patients and two placebo-treated patients were spasm free on the final day of the double-blind period (p = 0.063). At the end of the study, 15 children (38% of the original 40 patients or 42% of the 36 patients who entered the open phase) were spasm free with VGB monotherapy. No patient withdrew from the study because of an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: This unique randomized, placebo-controlled study is the first to demonstrate the efficacy of a specific drug in the treatment of West syndrome and supports the results of previously published open and prospective trials. It further confirms that VGB could be considered as the drug of first choice in treating infantile spasms.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability: impact on seizures, severity, and quality of life

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled UK trial evaluated the effect of topiramate as add-on therapy on seizure frequency, seizure severity, and quality of life in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability. There were three phases: 4 weeks baseline, 18 weeks titration to 200-400 mg topiramate/day (adults) or 5-9 mg/kg/day (children), 12 weeks maintenance. Recruitment was low (88/120); analyses were underpowered. Seizure frequency varied enormously (median 17.7, maximum 1706.2). There was no significant difference in reduction in mean total seizure frequency or number of responders between the groups. Topiramate reduced seizure frequency by >30% from baseline (placebo 1%); post hoc analyses showed a trend toward significance (R ratio, P=0.052). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to mean seizure severity or other outcome measures. Topiramate was generally well tolerated; body weight (P=0.015) and systolic blood pressure (P=0.043) were reduced. The study suggests that topiramate reduces seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability without the added burden of behavior effects, and was potentially advantageous to physical well-being.     

The Efficacy of Lamotrigine in Children and Adolescents with Refractory Generalized Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

Summary: Purpose: We report a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of lamotrigine (LTG) as add-on treatment in therapy-resistant, generalized epilepsy in children and adolescents (n = 30).
Methods: Twenty patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Each patient acted as his or her own control. LTG and placebo were randomly added to existing antiepileptic medication (AEDs). The LTG dosage was individualized in an open phase preceding the placebo/treatment phase. Patients who responded to LTG in the open phase went on to the double-blind phase. "Responders" were defined as patients with a >50% seizure reduction or less severe seizures or both, or improved behavior or improved motor skills or both. "Nonresponders" were defined as children who showed no positive effects of LTG with plasma levels of 10 μg/ml or children who had adverse events during the open phase.
Results: There was a clear statistically significant reduction of seizure frequency in LTG compared with placebo treatment. None of the children studied showed abnormal biochemical or hematologic findings, or changes in plasma levels of concomitantly administered AEDs.
Conclusions: LTG is a well-tolerated and effective treatment in children with intractable generalized epilepsies, including those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The study design allowed a double-blind placebo-controlled assessment of LTG although the participating children used 19 different AED combinations at entry.     

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with partial seizures: an open-label trial

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) as adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. METHODS: Children (aged 6-12 years) with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures receiving one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) were eligible. After a 4-week baseline period, children received LEV in a 6-week titration phase (target dose, 40 mg/kg/day) followed by an 8-week evaluation phase. Seizure frequency during the evaluation period with individualized LEV doses (20-40 mg/kg/day) were compared with the 4-week baseline seizure frequency. Plasma concentrations of LEV and other AEDs were determined to evaluate potential drug interactions. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects enrolled and received LEV; 23 entered the evaluation phase, and 22 completed the evaluation phase. Compared with their baseline seizure frequency, 12 (52%) of 23 subjects entering the evaluation phase had their seizure frequency decrease by >50%. Two subjects remained seizure free during the entire evaluation period. LEV did not significantly affect plasma concentrations of any concomitant AED during this study, and no alteration of mean clinical laboratory values was observed. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, infection, anorexia, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label study of adjunctive LEV therapy (at 20-40 mg/kg/day) suggests that LEV is effective, safe, and well tolerated in children ages 6-12 years with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of LEV adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures is needed and ongoing to confirm these open-label findings.     

Trial of antiepilepsirine (AES) in children with epilepsy

Antieplepsirine (AES) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) which was originally extracted from a Chinese folk remedy, and is now chemically characterized and synthesized. Its chemical structure is different from those of other available AEDs. Animal experiments involving AES demonstrated significant antiepileptic activity. Only a few clinical studies of AES with open trial have been resorted, none of which were on children. A 6.5 month, add-on, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over study on AES (10 mg/kg per day) was conducted on epileptic children (aged 1-14 years) refractory to treatment with standard AEDs. The seizure frequency was recorded, and the blood levels of AES and other co-medicated AEDs (phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproate) were determined. Although not planned, patients or parents were allowed to refuse to cross-over to the alternate therapy. The results were compared to the children who crossed-over as well as for the entire group during the first 3 months of randomized treatment. A total of 58 children entered, but only 34/58 children completed the cross-over study. The 24 children whose parents refused to let them be crossed-over continued the original study treatment (AES or placebo) for the entire 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in seizure control when the entire group of 58 patients was compared to a parallel study group for the first 3 months of therapy (P = 0.178). There was a significant difference (P<0.01) in seizure control between AES and placebo treatment for the 34 patients who completed the entire cross-over study. No significant changes were seen in the blood level of other AEDs, and no serious acute side effects were observed. The results of the present study indicate the efficacy of AES for epileptic children with refractory seizures.     

Rufinamide for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults and adolescents: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Purpose:   To evaluate efficacy and safety of adjunctive treatment with rufinamide 1600 mg twice daily in subjects aged ≥16 years with refractory partial seizures.
Methods:   This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial included an 8-week baseline phase and a 13-week double-blind phase. Treatment was initiated with rufinamide 400 mg twice daily or placebo; rufinamide was titrated to 1600 mg twice daily. Percentage change in partial seizure frequency was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included total partial seizure frequency and the percentage of subjects experiencing a ≥50% reduction in partial seizure frequency.
Results:   Three hundred thirteen subjects were randomized; 156 subjects received rufinamide and 157 received placebo. Rufinamide-treated subjects experienced a 20.4% median reduction in partial seizure frequency relative to baseline, while placebo-treated subjects had an increase of 1.6% (p = 0.02). Exclusion of subjects taking carbamazepine in a post hoc analysis resulted in a reduction of 29.2% versus 0.7% in the placebo group (p = 0.05), whereas the treatment difference in subjects taking carbamazepine was not significant. Of rufinamide-treated subjects, 28.2% experienced a ≥50% decrease in partial seizure frequency versus 18.6% of placebo-treated subjects (p = 0.04). The most common adverse events associated with rufinamide treatment were dizziness, nausea, diplopia, and ataxia; they occurred primarily during the titration phase.
Discussion:   Adjunctive therapy with rufinamide 3200 mg/day compared with matching placebo demonstrated efficacy and was generally well tolerated in adults with partial seizures. Further study of this agent in adults with partial seizures taking a range of baseline AEDs is warranted.