Verbesserung der Endokarderkennung mittels modifizierter transthorakaler Echokardiographie unter Verwendung der zweiten harmonischen Schwingungen (Tissue Harmonic Imaging)

In human tissue sound propagation is not linear resulting in a modification of the ultrasound waves. Therefore the received ultrasound frequencies are not just the transmitted frequencies of the transducer, but contain additional harmonic frequencies. These frequencies were not used by standard echocardiography. Harmonic imaging processes the second harmonic frequency. Distortion of the transmitted beam by shallow surface layers or reverberations between the skin surface and ribs impair image quality in conventional 2-dimensional echocardiography. Since harmonic components develop with propagation distance, the reverberations are almost entirely made up of ultrasound energy at the fundamental frequency. The exclusive processing of the second harmonic frequency provides an impressive improvement in image quality of 2-dimensional echocardiograms. Noise and clutter artifacts are reduced and endocardial borders are enhanced. Commercially available imagers provide tissue harmonic imaging using transmit frequencies from 1.7 to 2.1 MHz and second harmonic frequencies between 3.4 and 4.2 MHz. Several clinical studies have shown that harmonic imaging was superior to standard echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) wall motion by LV wall motion analysis. In patients with poor acoustic windows the number of myocardial segments which could be evaluated was significantly higher using harmonic imaging than standard echocardiography. Tissue harmonic imaging particularly improves the delineation of the anterior wall using the 2-chamber view and the lateral wall using the 4-chamber view. CONCLUSION: Harmonic imaging is a clinically relevant improvement of echocardiography. We suggest that this new technology should be the method of choice in the evaluation of LV function.     

Harmonic Power Doppler Contrast Echocardiography: Preliminary Clinical Results

Background: In fundamental and second harmonic echocardiography new contrast media opacify the cavities and reduce the difference in the gray level between the cavity and the myocardium thus obscuring the borders of the myocardium. Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the potential usefulness of second harmonic power Doppler imaging (HPD) in providing adequate delineation of the myocardium from the left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) cavities during intravenous contrast echocardiography. Using HPD, microbubbles in a cavity or a tissue are imaged as colored pixels superimposed on a conventional B-scan image. Methods: In a pilot study, three healthy volunteers and two patients with ischemic heart disease were investigated using an ATL-HDI 3000 echo system. Four chamber views were obtained using fundamental B-scan, harmonic B-scan two-dimensional echocardiography (H2D) and HPD following intravenous injections of 3 g Levovist*. Results: Using intermittent scanning/recording, H2D and HPD provided intensive and homogenous contrast effects in the RV and LV cavities. Good delineation of the myocardium was found in all subjects using HPD, whereas in two of three volunteers and in one of two patients ventricular septal and apical endocardial borders were obscured during H2D. No obvious change in myocardial backscatter was visually found with H2D. However, in all three healthy volunteers and in one of two patients, HPD recordings demonstrated patchy and reticular patterns in the myocardium, which were different from the homogenous signals in the LV cavity. These are consistent with imaging of intramyo-cardial coronary vessels. Conclusions: HPD with intravenous Levovist is feasible. This technique demonstrated good delineation of ventricular cavities from the myocardium as well as presence of visible contrast in the myocardium. This pilot study justifies further clinical trials to evaluate the clinical benefit of this approach.     

Usefulness of tissue harmonic imaging for the detection of left ventricular endocardial border

Assessment of segmental wall motion is one of the most challenging tasks in echocardiography. One major limitation is impairment of echocardiographic regional wall motion by incomplete endocardial definition. The newly developed tissue harmonic imaging method may improve the detection of left ventricular endocardial border. This study examined the impact of native tissue harmonic imaging on endocardial border definition. Fundamental and harmonic imaging were compared for detecting the endocardial border in 96 segments of 16 patients (age 54 +/- 8 years). Visualization of endocardial border was better with harmonic imaging than with fundamental mode in 49% (47 of 96 segments). Thus, tissue harmonic imaging has a significant impact on endocardial border definition.     

Effect of harmonic imaging without contrast on image quality of transesophageal echocardiography

Harmonic imaging improves endocardial border delineation during transesophageal echocardiography when compared with conventional imaging (26% improvement vs 2% worsening; p <0.001). This allows better assessment of left ventricular function during cardiac surgery, and suggests a role of harmonic imaging for transesophageal echocardiography.     

Contrast and harmonic imaging improves accuracy and efficiency of novice readers for dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Newer contrast agents as well as tissue harmonic imaging enhance left ventricular (LV) endocardial border delineation, and therefore, improve LV wall-motion analysis. Interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiography is observer-dependent and requires experience. This study was performed to evaluate whether these new imaging modalities would improve endocardial visualization and enhance accuracy and efficiency of the inexperienced reader interpreting dobutamine stress echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography. Both fundamental (2.5 MHZ) and harmonic (1.7 and 3.5 MHZ) mode images were obtained in four standard views at rest and at peak stress during a standard dobutamine infusion stress protocol. Following the noncontrast images, Optison was administered intravenously in bolus (0.5-3.0 ml), and fundamental and harmonic images were obtained. The dobutamine echocardiography studies were reviewed by one experienced and one inexperienced echocardiographer. LV segments were graded for image quality and function. Time for interpretation also was recorded. Contrast with harmonic imaging improved the diagnostic concordance of the novice reader to the expert reader by 7.1%, 7.5%, and 12.6% (P < 0.001) as compared with harmonic imaging, fundamental imaging, and fundamental imaging with contrast, respectively. For the novice reader, reading time was reduced by 47%, 55%, and 58% (P < 0.005) as compared with the time needed for fundamental, fundamental contrast, and harmonic modes, respectively. With harmonic imaging, the image quality score was 4.6% higher (P < 0.001) than for fundamental imaging. Image quality scores were not significantly different for noncontrast and contrast images. CONCLUSION: Harmonic imaging with contrast significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of the novice dobutamine stress echocardiography reader. The use of harmonic imaging reduces the frequency of nondiagnostic wall segments.     

Role of Contrast Echocardiography for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Function

The endocardial border of the left ventricle is incompletely identified in at least 30% of patients at rest or during stress echocardiography during fundamental imaging. This may lead to inaccurate assessment of regional and global left ventricular function or may lead to further diagnostic imaging with another modality resulting in a higher cost of healthcare. The recent development of second generation ultrasound contrast agents has resulted in improved detection of endocardial border at rest and during stress fundamental echocardiography. This has been consistently shown in various clinical trials involving 702 patients using a new contrast agent, SonoVue™. Other studies with contrast agents have also shown improved accuracy for determining left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes. Although unenhanced tissue harmonic imaging itself improved the assessment of left ventricular function, contrast enhanced harmonic imaging has recently been shown to be more accurate; however, larger clinical studies are required to establish the value of harmonic contrast imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function.     

Comparison of four echocardiographic techniques for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction

Accurate quantitative measurement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by 2-dimensional echocardiography is limited by subjective visual endocardial border detection. Both harmonic and precision contrast microbubbles provide better delineation of endocardial borders than fundamental imaging. The aim of this study was to correlate 2-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of LVEF measured by 4 currently available techniques with radionuclide angiography. A total of 50 patients who underwent radionuclide (EF) measurement (47 of 50 had technically difficult echocardiograms by fundamental imaging) underwent echocardiography by 4 methods: fundamental alone, fundamental with contrast, harmonic alone, and harmonic with contrast. Three echocardiologists measured the biplane 2-dimensional echocardiographic LVEF independently and were blinded to radionuclide angiography. The correlation of echocardiographic EF with radionuclide EF improved incrementally with each method. However, contrast with harmonic imaging provided the closest correlation (r = 0.95, 0.96, and 0.95 as assessed by the 3 independent analysts.     

Non-contrast second harmonic imaging improves interobserver agreement and accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with impaired image quality

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of second harmonic imaging during dobutamine echocardiography on regional endocardial visibility, interobserver agreement in the interpretation of wall motion abnormalities, and diagnostic accuracy in patients with reduced image quality. DESIGN: Blinded comparison. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: 103 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease and impaired transthoracic image quality (>/= 2 segments with poor endocardial delineation). METHODS: Fundamental and second harmonic imaging were performed at each stage of a dobutamine stress echocardiography. Coronary angiography was undertaken within three weeks of dobutamine echocardiography in 75 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of regional endocardial visibility (scoring from 0 = poor to 2 = good) and of segmental wall motion abnormalities for both modalities separately. A second blinded examiner analysed 70 studies to determine interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Mean (SD) visibility score for all segments was 1.2 (0.4) using fundamental imaging and 1.7 (0.2) using second harmonic imaging at rest (p < 0.001), and 1.1 (0.4) v 1.6 (0.3), respectively, at peak dobutamine dose (p < 0.001). The average number of segments with poor endocardial visibility was lower for second harmonic than for fundamental imaging (0.6 (1.1) v 3.8 (2.6) at rest, p < 0.001; 0.9 (1.3) v 4.3 (2.9) at peak dose, p < 0.001). Improvement was most pronounced in all lateral and anterior segments. The kappa value for identical study interpretation increased from 0. 40 to 0.69 (p < 0.05). Sensitivity for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease was 64% using fundamental imaging versus 92% using harmonic imaging (p < 0.001), while specificity remained unchanged at 75% for both imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Second harmonic imaging enhances endocardial visibility during dobutamine echocardiography. Consequently, interobserver agreement on stress echocardiography interpretation and diagnostic accuracy are significantly improved compared to fundamental imaging. Thus, in difficult to image patients, dobutamine echocardiography should be performed using second harmonic imaging.     

Contrast echocardiography: clinical utility for the evaluation of left ventricular systolic function

Despite continued improvements in imaging technology, transthoracic echocardiography does not reliably provide images adequate for interpretation in all patients. In these patients, the administration of ultrasound contrast agents can markedly enhance the diagnostic utility of the test. Contrast echocardiography relies on the ultrasound detection of contrast agents composed of encapsulated microbubbles that are generally smaller than red blood cells. Intravenous administration of microbubble contrast agents results in left ventricular opacification and facilitates delineation of the endocardial border. This procedure has been shown to consistently increase the number of myocardial segments that can be interpreted, to improve accuracy of assessing regional and global left ventricular function, to decrease interinterpreter variability, to increase interpreter confidence, and to be a cost-effective strategy. Accordingly, patient selection for contrast echocardiography should be based not only on adequacy of the baseline images, but also on the clinical question being asked.     

Head-to-head comparison of fundamental, tissue harmonic and contrast harmonic imaging with or without an air-filled contrast agent, levovist, for endocardial border delineation in patients with poor quality images.

Recent developments in tissue harmonic imaging and intravenous contrast agents have enhanced left ventricular endocardial border delineation (EBD). In a total of 48 patients with poor quality images, apical 4- and 2-chamber views were obtained with fundamental, tissue harmonic and contrast harmonic imaging with or without intravenous Levovist, an air-filled contrast agent. The left ventricle (LV) was divided into 12 segments, and the EBD of each segment was scored: (1) not visible, (2) barely visible, (3) well delineated. The EBD index (EBDI), defined as the sum of the endocardial scores divided by 12 was obtained for each patient. Of a total of 576 LV segments, 231 were scored as 1 by fundamental imaging and that number decreased to 125 segments by tissue harmonic imaging and 116 segments by fundamental imaging with Levovist. The number of segments scored as 1 decreased to 38 segments by tissue harmonic imaging with Levovist, and to 29 segments by contrast harmonic imaging with Levovist. The EBDI by fundamental imaging was 1.85+/-0.29, which improved significantly with the addition of Levovist (2.10+/-0.36, p<0.001) and was nearly identical to that by tissue harmonic imaging (2.15+/-0.32, p=NS). Tissue and contrast harmonic imaging with Levovist further enhanced the EBDI (2.43+/-0.26, 2.51+/-0.27, respectively). Levovist enhances EBD, even in the fundamental mode, to the level obtained with tissue harmonic imaging. Tissue harmonic and contrast harmonic imaging are the best modalities for enhancing EBD after Levovist injection.     

Endocardial border delineation during dobutamine infusion using contrast echocardiography

BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of pharmacologic stress echocardiograms produce suboptimal images despite the use of second harmonic imaging. Intravenous continuous infusion of myocardial ultrasound contrast may enhance endocardial border delineation during dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DASE), improving wall-motion analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 68 patients (41 males and 27 females), mean age 58 years, with DASE during intravenous infusion of contrast using second harmonic imaging. Dobutamine was infused in scalar doses of 5 microg/kg/min to 40 microg/kg/min, and atropine was administered in doses of up to 1 mg. We diluted 0.1 mL of perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin (PESDA) microbubbles into 80 mL of saline solution, which was used for continuous intravenous infusion. Blinded reviewers used a 16-segment model at rest and peak DASE to analyze segmental wall delineation in two sets of images for each patient, with and without contrast. An endocardial delineation score of 0-3 (nondelineated to excellent delineation) was given to each segment. An endocardial delineation score index (EDSI), the number of endocardial delineation scores for each set of images divided by 16, was created. RESULTS: The analysis of the mean EDSI for the 2176 segments was 1.46 (+/- 0.43) at rest and 1.30 (+/- 0.48) at peak for noncontrast images and 2.22 (+/- 0.52) and 2.29 (+/- 0.52) for contrast images. Complete left ventricle opacification was obtained in all patients, with a mean dose of 4 mL/min, although in 15 (22%) patients, signs of apical bubble destruction occurred. There were 1768 (81%) of 2176 segments delineated without contrast enhancement and 2057 (95%) of 2176 with enhancement (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion of myocardial ultrasound contrast improves endocardial border delineation using second harmonic imaging in patients undergoing DASE.     

Use of harmonic echocardiographic contrast imaging and intravenous bolus of Levovist for evaluation of the left ventricle

Harmonic imaging is a new imaging modality using nonlinear acoustic response, which is particularly sensitive for the particles of contrast agents. Our study was designed to compare the potential of harmonic echocardiographic imaging of the left ventricle using a contrast agent, Levovist to improve the detection of endocardium in patients with suboptimal image quality. 40 patients were studied using standard transthoracic apical views of the left ventricle patients using fundamental frequency and second harmonic frequency after and intravenous injection of 2.5 g Levovist. The quality of endocardial delineation in 16 standard segments was scored from 0 to 2. Endocardial visualization index was calculated as a mean of the scores to express overall diagnostic quality. Harmonic imaging with contrast significantly improved left ventricular endocardial border detection (endocardial visualization index at baseline 1.24 +/- 0.41, with contrast 1.63 +/- 0.38; p < 0.001). The improvement was qualitatively observed in all parts of the left ventricle: in apex (2.4 +/- 0.8), in the middle part (2.5 +/- 0.9) and slightly less in the basal part (2.1 +/- 1.1) as scored on a 0-3 scale. The number of invisible segments decreased from 124 (fundamental) to 50 in contrast harmonic mode. The persistence of the contrast enhancement, prolonged in harmonic as compared to fundamental imaging (284 +/- 136s vs 117 +/- 87s; p < 0.001) enabled convenient recording of all necessary views. Harmonic imaging after an intravenous injection of Levovist significantly improves the visualization of left ventricular endocardial border. Prolonged contrast effect after a single bolus enhances the pertinence of the method in clinical practice.     

Measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction after intravenous contrast agent administration using standard echocardiographic equipment

The enhancement of endocardial border delineation using second harmonic imaging and contrast administration improves the measurement of ventricular volumes. In the majority of existing echocardiographic equipment, however, harmonic imaging is not yet available. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction after intravenous administration of the contrast agent Levovist using standard echocardiographic equipment and fundamental imaging modality. In 10 patients with good-quality two-dimensional echo imaging, 4 g (400 mg/mL concentration) of Levovist was injected intravenously. Hewlett-Packard Sonos 2000 ultrasound equipment without second harmonic imaging capability was used. To avoid the destruction of microbubbles, the echo machine was set to produce only one end-systolic and one end-diastolic frame in each cardiac cycle (dual triggering). Native and contrast imaging measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions calculated by modified Simpson's rule were compared in the fundamental mode. Intraobserver and interobserver variability values were assessed. End-diastolic volumes in native continuous and triggered mode and by contrast echo were 126 +/- 48, 121 +/- 46, and 130 +/- 50 mL, respectively (NS), whereas end-systolic volumes were 79 +/- 48, 76 +/- 45, and 79 +/- 46 mL, respectively (NS). Calculated ejection fraction using the three different imaging modalities were 0.41 +/- 0.16, 0.41 +/- 0.16, and 0.42 +/- 0.16 (NS). The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility values were excellent in triggered mode. Standard echocardiographic equipment with fundamental imaging modality in the triggered mode is suitable for the measurement of left ventricular volumes after intravenous Levovist administration. In clinically difficult patients, contrast echocardiography in triggered mode may be applied even if echocardiographic equipment does not have harmonic imaging possibility.     

Freehand three-dimensional assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with ultrasound contrast agent LK565.

AIMS: Accurate assessment of left ventricular function by determining left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction is important in evaluating the prognoses of patients with heart failure. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography suffers from low correlation with reference methods like ventriculography. Three-dimensionally (3D) assessed data have been proved to have better conformity. Endocardial border delineation remains a problem, however, especially in patients with suboptimal recordings. Few data exist on 3D-echocardiographic volumetry with ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs). We evaluated the second-generation UCA LK565 for its boundary-tracing capacities in freehand 3D echocardiography in a phase II clinical trial. Safety and efficacy of the novel contrast agent were also evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients between the age of 42 and 77 were included in this trial. Left ventricular end-systolic and -diastolic volume (LVESV, LVEDV) and ejection fraction (EF) were determined by either 2D or 3D freehand second harmonic echocardiography with and without use of LK565. Parameters were compared statistically with ventriculography performed in 35 patients. Immune response to LK565 was evaluated by analysing phagocytosis capacity and kinetics of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-gamma). Patients were monitored for adverse events up to 72 h after application of the UCA. Calculated values for left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction correlated best for freehand 3D echocardiography in combination with LK565 (r=0.92 for LVEDV; r=0.96 for LVESV; r=0.94 for EF). Excellent left ventricular contrast enhancement was achieved for approximately 8 min. A reversible saturation of phagocytosis capacity for monocytes and neutrophils set in with a maximum peak at 6h. No significant increase in cytokine expression was observed. CONCLUSION: LK565 improves feasibility of endocardial border delineation in 3D echocardiography, leading to better correlation of left ventricular volumetry with reference methods. Efficacy and safety of LK565 are equivalent to those of conventional UCAs.     

Impact of tissue harmonic imaging in patients with distorted left ventricles: improvement in accuracy and reproducibility of visual, manual and automated echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the incremental value of tissue harmonic imaging vs conventional echocardiography for evaluating left ventricular ejection fraction by manual and automated quantitation as well as visual estimation in patients with distorted left ventricles. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 25 patients unselected for image quality and with distorted left ventricles who underwent a nuclear study, digital cineloops of standard apical views were acquired by both tissue harmonic imaging and conventional echocardiography and sent to six observers for analysis of visual and quantitative left ventricular ejection fraction. Tissue harmonic imaging improved both the correlation and agreement of all echo techniques with nuclear measures, compared with conventional echocardiography echo, reducing standard errors (SE) to below 10%: for the visual estimate SE=7.5%, for manual tracing SE=6.3% and for automated tracing SE=8%. Tissue harmonic imaging decreased inter-observer variability compared with conventional echocardiography echo for both visual assessment (12.4% vs 18.4%, P<0.05) and quantitative measures (for manual tracing, 8.2% vs 11.8%, P<0.05; for automated tracing, 7.8% vs 16.8%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with distorted left ventricles unselected for image quality, tissue harmonic imaging improves accuracy and reproducibility of both visual and quantitative echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction. In particular, it promotes automated quantitation by reducing its high standard error into a clinically reasonable range.     

Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Color Doppler for Left Ventricular Opacification: Improved Endocardial Border Definition Compared to Tissue Harmonic Imaging and Optimization of Methodology in Patients with Suboptimal Echocardiograms

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic color Doppler (C-HCD) and tissue harmonic imaging (THI) for left ventricular endocardial border delineation and explored the optimal methodology of C-HCD in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms. BACKGROUND: The value of C-HCD in improving endocardium remains unknown. Effects of harmonic velocity-encoded color Doppler (HVD) and harmonic power Doppler (HPD) as well as contrast administration and image acquisition modalities on left ventricular opacification (LVO) have not been established. METHODS: One hundred (50 HVD, 50 HPD) patients with suboptimal echocardiograms during conventional fundamental echocardiography were studied with THI and C-HCD using Levovist. Each patient underwent different random contrast administration and image acquisition modalities. Endocardial border definition score index (EBDI), blooming artifacts, contrast destruction, and salvage of suboptimal echocardiograms were calculated in each patient after contrast enhancement. RESULTS: EBDI improved from 2.05 +/- 0.61 in THI to 2.73 +/- 0.48 in HVD, and 1.98 +/- 0.73 in THI to 2.69 +/- 0.51 in HPD (both P < 0.001). The conversion of a nondiagnostic image from fundamental echocardiography to an optimal diagnostic image was 33 (33%) patients in THI compared to 77 (77%) patients in C-HCD (P < 0.001). Blooming artifacts were seen more commonly in HVD than HPD, intermittent than continuous image acquisition, and bolus than infusion administration (all P < 0.001). There was less contrast destruction in intermittent compared with continuous image acquisition (P < 0.001). Contrast destruction was similar in HVD and HPD, bolus and infusion injection of contrast. The highest salvage rate of a nondiagnostic image from THI to an optimal diagnostic image was 45.5% and 42.4% in HPD mode, with intermittent image acquisition during bolus and infusion contrast administrations. CONCLUSIONS: C-HCD seems more effective in demonstrating improved endocardial border definition compared to THI. HPD has less blooming artifacts compared with HCD. The optimal method for LVO was to use HPD with intermittent image acquisition during bolus or infusion administration of Levovist.     

Contrast echocardiography is superior to tissue harmonics for assessment of left ventricular function in mechanically ventilated patients

BACKGROUND: Assessment of left ventricular function by echocardiography is frequently challenging in mechanically ventilated patients. We evaluated the potential value of contrast-enhanced imaging and tissue harmonic imaging over standard fundamental imaging for endocardial border detection (EBD) in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent standard transthoracic 2D echocardiography and were imaged in fundamental and tissue harmonic modes and subsequently with intravenous contrast (Optison). Two echocardiographers reviewed all studies for ease of visualization of endocardial border segments and scoring of wall motion. EBD for each wall segment was graded from 1 to 4 (1 = excellent EBD). Wall motion was scored by a standard 16-segment model and 1 to 5 scale. Studies were categorized as nondiagnostic if 4 of 6 segments in the apical 4-chamber view were either poorly seen or not seen (EBD score 3 or 4). Quantification of ejection fraction was independently performed offline. Visualization of 68% of all segments improved with contrast echocardiography versus 17% improvement with tissue harmonics compared with fundamental mode. Significant improvement (poor/not seen to good/excellent) occurred in 60% of segments with contrast echocardiography versus 18% with tissue harmonics. A total of 850 segments were deemed poor/not seen, 78% of which improved to good/excellent with contrast echocardiography versus 23% with tissue harmonics. Interobserver agreement on EBD was 64% to 70%. Conversion of nondiagnostic to diagnostic studies occurred in 85% of patients with contrast echocardiography versus 15% of patients with tissue harmonics. Scoring of wall motion with fundamental mode, tissue harmonics, and contrast echocardiography was possible in 61%, 74%, and 95% of individual segments, respectively (P <.001). Wall motion scoring was altered in 17% of segments with contrast echocardiography and in 8% with tissue harmonics. Interobserver agreement on wall motion scoring was 84% to 88%. Contrast echocardiography permitted measurement of ejection fraction 45% (P =.003) more often over fundamental mode versus a 27% (P =.09) increase with tissue harmonics. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast echocardiography is superior to tissue harmonic imaging for EBD, wall motion scoring, and quantification of ejection fraction in mechanically ventilated patients.     

Comparison of native and contrast-enhanced harmonic echocardiography for visualization of left ventricular endocardial border

Our study was designed to compare the utility of fundamental and second harmonic imaging (SH) for visualization of the left ventricular (LV) endocardial border. SH is a new imaging modality using nonlinear acoustic response, which may provide better endocardial border delineation. Standard apical views were studied in 42 patients using fundamental frequency (FF), SH without contrast (1.6- to 1.8-MHz and 2.1- to 2.5-MHz transmission frequencies), and SH after an intravenous injection of 2.5 g of Levovist. The quality of endocardial delineation in 16 standard segments was scored from 0 to 2. The endocardial visualization index was calculated as a mean of the scores. SH with and without contrast significantly improved LV endocardial border detection (endocardial visualization index 1.25+/-0.53, 1.64+/-0.67, 1.55+/-0.69, and 1.73+/-0.28 for fundamental, lower, and higher frequency harmonic and contrast-harmonic mode, respectively, p <0.005). Improvement was found in all LV segments. The number of invisible segments decreased from 142 (FF) to 54, 112, and 61 (in lower, higher, and contrast SH mode, respectively, p <0.001). Endocardial delineation in the apical segments using SH was optimal after contrast injection. In the basal LV area, contrast-enhanced images were less informative because of signal attenuation. Thus, SH significantly improves visualization of the LV endocardial border. Contrast enhancement with Levovist improves imaging of the apical segments but has no additional advantage in the basal segments. SH emerges as first-line modality for studies of LV function.     

Enhancement of Left Ventricular Cavity Opacification by Harmonic Imaging After Venous Injection of Albunex

Venous injection of Albunex does not consistently produce left ventricular (LV) cavity opacification during conventional echocardiography. We postulated that by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio, harmonic imaging will result in more successful LV cavity opacification and provide a better assessment of regional LV systolic function. Forty-two patients with poor baseline endocardial delineation were given 10 ml intravenous injections of Albunex during continuous fundamental and harmonic imaging. Change in segmental wall-thickening scores and the confidence levels for these scores were assessed for 3 observers with various levels of experience. Compared with fundamental imaging, harmonic imaging significantly improved the success of LV cavity opacification (83% vs 62%, p <0.05). The background-subtracted video intensity within the central two thirds of the LV cavity increased threefold (from 10 ± 15 to 31 ± 29, p <0.05) with harmonic imaging. The spatial extent of opacification increased from 40% of the LV cavity during fundamental imaging to 65% with harmonic imaging (p <0.001). The confidence level for assessing regional LV systolic function improved (p <0.05) after contrast administration, particularly when observer experience was limited. We conclude that in patients with poor endocardial definition, injection of intravenous Albunex should be combined with harmonic imaging to improve LV cavity opacification.

We assessed left ventricular (LV) cavity opacification produced by venous injection of Albunex during fundamental and harmonic imaging in 42 patients. Harmonic imaging significantly increased the success rate of LV cavity opacification, the background-subtracted peak video intensity, and the spatial extent of cavity opacification; harmonic imaging also improved the confidence level for assessing regional LV systolic function, especially in readers with less experience.     

Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with contrast (sonicated albumin echocardiography and Doppler myocardial imaging for enhancing endocardial border resolution

Endocardial resolution during 2-dimensional echocardiography is technically limited in at least 10% to 15% of patients. Recently, several ultrasound imaging innovations have been introduced that may improve endocardial resolution and decrease the proportion of technically difficult studies. This study compares tissue harmonic imaging, intravenous sonicated albumin, and Doppler myocardial imaging in patients with technically difficult echocardiograms. Twenty-eight patients with known or suspected cardiac disease and poor baseline endocardial resolution were studied. Only harmonic imaging (conventional and optimized for tissue) was superior to baseline fundamental imaging (p <0.001). Harmonic imaging was superior to baseline imaging in all myocardial regions and in the majority of patients, including those with the worst baseline studies.