Efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (NT 201, Xeomin) in the treatment of blepharospasm—A randomized trial

IncobotulinumtoxinA (NT 201, Xeomin) is a highly purified botulinum neurotoxin type A formulation, free from complexing proteins. A randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial of efficacy and safety compared incobotulinumtoxinA (up to 50 U per eye) to placebo administered in a single treatment session to patients with blepharospasm. All patients had documented satisfactory response to 2 previous treatments with botulinum neurotoxin type A other than incobotulinumtoxinA and had Jankovic Rating Scale severity subscores ≥ 2. Patients (n = 109) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to incobotulinumtoxinA or placebo and followed up to 20 weeks; 94% completed the study. A significant difference was observed in the primary efficacy variable (change in Jankovic Rating Scale severity subscore rated by an independent rater 6 weeks following treatment), favoring incobotulinumtoxinA by 1.0 point (95% CI [0.5–1.4]; P < .001). Functional impairment, as measured by the Blepharospasm Disability Index, improved by 0.5 points (95% CI [0.2–0.7]; P = .002) compared with placebo. There was a strong correlation between the 2 scale scores. In addition, all secondary outcome measures favored incobotulinumtoxinA. Patients rated the mean therapeutic effect of incobotulinumtoxinA significantly better than placebo (P < .001). Adverse events were reported in 70.3% of incobotulinumtoxinA patients and 58.8% of placebo patients. Eyelid ptosis (18.9% vs 5.9%), dry eye (18.9% vs 11.8%), and dry mouth (14.9% vs 2.9%) occurred most frequently. Tolerability was rated good/very good by 91.9% of incobotulinumtoxinA versus in 85.2% of placebo patients. In conclusion, incobotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated and was associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions in blepharospasm severity and functional impairment. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

A double‐blind,placebo‐controlled trial of rosiglitazone for clozapine‐induced glucose metabolism impairment in patients with Schizophrenia

Objective: The primary purpose of this 8‐week double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of rosiglitazone 4 mg/day was to examine its effect on insulin sensitivity index (SI) and glucose utilization (SG) in clozapine‐treated subjects with schizophrenia with insulin resistance. Method: Eighteen subjects were randomized and accessed with a Frequently Sampled Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test (FSIVGTT) at baseline and at week 8 to estimate SG and SI. Results: Controlling for the baseline, comparing the rosiglitazone group with placebo group, there was a non‐significant improvement in SG (0.016 ± 0.006–0.018 ± 0.008, effect size = 0.23, P = 0.05) with a trend of improvement in SI in the rosiglitazone group (4.6 ± 2.8–7.8 ± 6.7, effect size = 0.18, P = 0.08). There was a significant reduction in small low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) particle number (987 ± 443–694 ± 415, effect size = 0.30, P = 0.04). Conclusion: Rosiglitazone may have a role in addressing insulin resistance and lipid abnormalities associated with clozapine.     

Orodispersible sublingual piribedil to abort OFF episodes: A single dose placebo‐controlled,randomized, double‐blind,cross‐over study

S90049, a novel sublingual formulation of the non‐ergoline D₂‐D₃ agonist piribedil, has a pharmacokinetic profile promising to provide rapid relief on motor signs in Parkinson's disease (PD). We assessed the efficacy and safety of S90049 in aborting OFF episodes responding to subcutaneous apomorphine in PD patients with motor fluctuations. This was a single‐dose double‐blind double‐placebo 3 × 3 cross‐over study. Optimal tested doses were determined during a previous open‐label titration phase (S90049 median dose: 60 mg, apomorphine: 5 mg). Primary endpoint was the maximal change versus baseline in UPDRS motor score (ΔUPDRS III) assessed after drug administration following an overnight withdrawal of antiparkinsonian medications. Thirty patients (age: 60 ± 8 years, PD duration: 12 ± 6 years, UPDRS III OFF: 37 ± 15) participated. S90049 wassuperior to placebo on ΔUPDRS III (?13 ± 12 versus ?7 ± 9 respectively; estimated difference ?5.2, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)[?10.4;0.05], P = 0.05). This was also true for secondary outcomes: number of patients switching from OFF to ON (17 on S90049 vs. 8 on placebo, P = 0.03), time to turn ON (P = 0.013) and duration of the ON phase (P = 0.03). In the 17 patients who switched ON on S90049, ΔUPDRS III was similar on S90049 (?21.2 ± 10.1) and apomorphine (?23.6 ± 14.1) (estimated difference: 4.0 95% CI [?2.9;10.9]). S90049 was well tolerated: no serious or unexpected adverse event occurred. A single dose of up to 60 mg of S90049 given sublingually was superior to placebo in improving UPDRS III and aborting a practical OFF in patients with advanced PD. Testing greater doses might improve response rate. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Dose response with onabotulinumtoxinA for post‐stroke spasticity: A pooled data analysis

Clinical trials demonstrate that onabotulinumtoxinA reduces upper limb post‐stroke spasticity, with therapeutic response influenced by injected dose. Individual studies provide limited insight regarding muscle group‐specific dose–response relationships. Our objective was to characterize dose–response relationships between onabotulinumtoxinA and muscle tone in specific upper limb muscles. Individual patient data from seven multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials were pooled. Of 544 post‐stroke patients enrolled, 362 received onabotulinumtoxinA and 182 received placebo, injected into the flexor carpi radialis (FCR), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), and/or biceps brachii (BB). Ashworth Scale score change at week 6 (AshworthCBL) was the primary outcome measure for muscle tone. For a broader analysis of response, AshworthCBL/onabotulinumtoxinA dosage relationships were characterized using three techniques: (1) AshworthCBL plotted as a function of onabotulinumtoxinA dose in Units (U) [dose–response curve]; (2) mean AshworthCBL per onabotulinumtoxinA dose depicting the responses seen with specific dose injection clusters/groups for each specific muscle group; and (3) onabotulinumtoxinA dose estimated to produce a mean 1‐point decrease in AshworthCBL as an indicator of clinically meaningful benefit of treatment. Increasing onabotulinumtoxinA doses produced greater AshworthCBLs (muscle tone improvements). The maximal week 6 response (E_max) model indicated a saturating dose–response relationship, with mean E_max AshworthCBL values of ‐1.48, ‐1.48, ‐0.63, ‐0.77, and ‐0.61 in the FCR, FCU, FDS, FDP, and BB, respectively. OnabotulinumtoxinA doses estimated to produce a mean 1‐point decrease in AshworthCBL were: 22.5U, 18.4U, 66.3U, 42.5U in the FCR, FCU, FDS, and FDP, respectively, and not determinable in the BB. These analyses demonstrate a saturating effect of greater muscle tone improvements with increasing onabotulinumtoxinA doses in post‐stroke spasticity patients. These findings suggest potentially effective onabotulinumtoxinA doses in selected muscle groups in this study population. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society.     

Does the treatment of spastic equinovarus deformity following stroke with botulinum toxin increase gait velocity? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

While botulinum toxin‐A (BT‐A) has been used to treat lower‐limb focal spasticity successfully, its effect on characteristics of gait has not been well defined. The objective of this systematic review was to establish the treatment effect associated with the use of BT‐A for equinovarus to improve gait velocity following stroke, using a meta‐analytic technique. Relevant studies were identified through a literature search encompassing the years 1985 to November 2009. Studies were included if (i) the sample was composed of adult subjects recovering from either first or subsequent stroke, presenting with spastic equinovarus deformity of the ankle preventing full active dorsiflexion, and (ii) subjects who received BT‐A were compared with subjects who had received a placebo, or (iii) in the absence of a placebo‐controlled condition, subject had received BT‐A and was assessed before and after treatment. A standardized mean difference (SMD) ± standard error and 95% confidence interval (CI) for gait velocity between the treatment and control group was calculated for each study, using Hedges’s g, and the results pooled. Eight trials, five randomized controlled trials, and three single group intervention studies were included. Data representing 228 subjects were available for pooled analysis. Treatment with BT‐A was associated with a small improvement in gait velocity (Hedge’s g = 0.193 ± 0.081; 95% CI: 0.033 to 0.353, P < 0.018) representing an increase of 0.044 meters/s. The use of BT‐A for lower‐limb post‐stroke equinovarus because of spasticity was associated with a small, but statistically significant increase in gait velocity.     

Metabolic effects of adjunctive aripiprazole in clozapine‐treated patients with schizophrenia

Fan X, Borba CPC, Copeland P, Hayden D, Freudenreich O, Goff DC, Henderson DC. Metabolic effects of adjunctive aripiprazole in clozapine‐treated patients with schizophrenia. Objective: This study examined the effects of adjunctive aripiprazole therapy on metabolism in clozapine‐treated patients with schizophrenia. Method: In an 8‐week randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, subjects received either aripiprazole (15 mg/day) or placebo. At baseline and week 8, metabolic parameters were assessed by the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and whole‐body dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: Thirty subjects completed the study (16 in the aripiprazole group and 14 in the placebo group). Glucose effectiveness measured by the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test improved significantly in the aripiprazole group (0.003 ± 0.006 vs. ?0.005 ± 0.007/min, P = 0.010). The aripiprazole group showed significant reductions in both plasma low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) levels (?15.1 ± 19.8 vs. 4.4 ± 22.5 mg/dl, P = 0.019) and LDL particle numbers (?376 ± 632 vs. ?36 ± 301 nm , P = 0.035). Further, there was a significant reduction in the lean mass (?1125 ± 1620 vs. 607 ± 1578 g, P = 0.011) measured by whole‐body DXA scan in the aripiprazole group. All values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, aripiprazole vs. placebo. Conclusion: Adjunctive therapy with aripiprazole may have some metabolic benefits in clozapine‐treated patients with schizophrenia.     

A randomized, double-blind study of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) in cervical dystonia

IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin^®, NT 201), a preparation without accessory (complexing) proteins, has shown comparable efficacy and safety to onabotulinumtoxinA in treating cervical dystonia (CD). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA injections in subjects with CD. Following a ≤20-week placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, single-dose main period, subjects could enter a ≤68-week prospective, randomized, double-blind, repeated-dose, flexible-interval (minimum 6 weeks) extension period with 240 U or 120 U of incobotulinumtoxinA (≤5 injections). Outcome measures included the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and adverse events (AEs). Of 219 subjects completing the main period, 214 were randomized in the extension period to receive incobotulinumtoxinA 240 U (n = 111) or 120 U (n = 103); 169 subjects completed the extension period, with 90 receiving five injection sessions. Both doses of incobotulinumtoxinA provided statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in mean TWSTRS-Total, -Severity, -Disability, and -Pain scores, from each injection session to respective 4-week follow-up visits. The most frequently reported AE was dysphagia (240 U: 23.4 %; 120 U: 12.6 %), which did not result in any study withdrawals. There was no impact of injection interval on the incidence of AEs (post hoc analysis). A major limitation of this study was the fixed dose design requested by regulatory authorities, which does not reflect clinical practice. However, repeated incobotulinumtoxinA injections (240 or 120 U; flexible intervals) provided sustained efficacy and were well tolerated, with no unexpected safety risks following repeated injections. The incidence of AEs was similar in subjects requiring repeated injections at shorter intervals (≤12 weeks) compared with those treated using longer intervals (>12 weeks).     

Early treatment benefits of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Efficacy And Safety Evaluation in Parkinson's Disease (EASE‐PD) Adjunct Study, assessing the minimum time to symptom improvement after initiation of ropinirole prolonged release (2–24 mg/day) versus placebo in patients with moderate‐to‐advanced PD not optimally controlled with levodopa. Ropinirole prolonged release was superior to placebo at Week 2 for change from baseline in “off” time (adjusted mean treatment difference [AMTD] – 0.7 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI], –1.1, –0.2; P = 0.0029), and “on” time without troublesome dyskinesia (0.4 hours; 95%CI, 0.01, 0.88; P = 0.0444). At Week 4, improvements were seen in change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale total motor score (AMTD, –3.1; 95%CI, –4.4, –1.8; P < 0.0001), activities of daily living score (AMTD, –1.1; 95%CI, –1.7, –0.5; P = 0.0004), and the cardinal symptoms of PD compared with placebo. These analyses indicate that once‐daily, adjunctive ropinirole prolonged release can offer PD symptom control 2 weeks after treatment initiation. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Muscular adaptations and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 responses to resistance training are stretch‐mediated

Introduction: Modulation of muscle characteristics was attempted through altering muscle stretch during resistance training. We hypothesized that stretch would enhance muscle responses. Methods: Participants trained for 8 weeks, loading the quadriceps in a shortened (SL, 0–50° knee flexion; n = 10) or lengthened (LL, 40–90°; n = 11) position, followed by 4 weeks of detraining. Controls (CON; n = 10) were untrained. Quadriceps strength, vastus lateralis architecture, anatomical cross‐sectional area (aCSA), and serum insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) were measured at weeks 0, 8, 10, and 12. Results: Increases in fascicle length (29 ± 4% vs. 14 ± 4%), distal aCSA (53 ± 12% vs. 18 ± 8%), strength (26 ± 6% vs. 7 ± 3%), and IGF‐1 (31 ± 6% vs. 7 ± 6%) were greater in LL compared with SL muscles (P < 0.05). No changes occurred in CON. Detraining decrements in strength and aCSA were greater in SL than LL muscles (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Enhanced muscle in vivo (and somewhat IGF‐1) adaptations to resistance training are concurrent with muscle stretch, which warrants its inclusion within training. Muscle Nerve 49 : 108–119, 2014     

Electrophysiology in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with IGIV

Patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) received immune globulin intravenous, 10% caprylate/chromatography purified (IGIV‐C, Gamunex; n = 59) or placebo (n = 58) every 3 weeks for up to 24 weeks (first period) in a randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, response‐conditional, crossover study. Motor and sensory nerves were assessed at baseline and endpoint/week 24. A nonsignificant trend toward improvement in the proximal amplitude of the most severely affected motor nerve was observed with IGIV‐C (0.69 ± 1.86 mV) versus placebo (0.47 ± 2.29 mV), and a greater improvement of 1.08 ± 2.15 mV with IGIV‐C versus 0.46 ± 2.03 mV with placebo (P = 0.089) was observed with exclusion of data from Erb's point stimulation. Greater improvements from baseline favoring IGIV‐C were observed for 127/142 electrophysiologic parameters. The averaged motor amplitudes from all motor nerves significantly improved with IGIV‐C versus placebo [treatment difference, 0.62 mV; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05, 1.20; P = 0.035], and conduction block decreased significantly (treatment difference, ?5.54%; 95% CI, ?10.43, ?0.64; P = 0.027), particularly in the lower limbs. Overall, the data suggest that IGIV‐C improves electrophysiologic parameters in CIDP. Muscle Nerve, 2009     

Long‐term clinical outcome in meige syndrome treated with internal pallidum deep brain stimulation

Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus (GPi DBS) is effective in the treatment of primary segmental and generalized dystonia. Although limb, neck, or truncal dystonia are markedly improved, orofacial dystonia is ameliorated to a lesser extent. Nevertheless, several case reports and small cohort studies have described favorable short‐term results of GPi DBS in patients with severe Meige syndrome. Here, we extend this preliminary experience by reporting long‐term outcome in a multicenter case series, following 12 patients (6 women, 6 men) with Meige syndrome for up to 78 months after bilateral GPi DBS. We retrospectively assessed dystonia severity based on preoperative and postoperative video documentation. Mean age of patients at surgery was 64.5 ± 4.4 years, and mean disease duration 8.3 ± 4.4 years. Dystonia severity as assessed by the Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale showed a mean improvement of 45% at short‐term follow‐up (4.4 ± 1.5 months; P < 0.001) and of 53% at long‐term follow‐up (38.8 ± 21.7 months; P < 0.001). Subscores for eyes were improved by 38% (P = 0.004) and 47% (P < 0.001), for mouth by 50% (P < 0.001) and 56% (P < 0.001), and for speech/swallowing by 44% (P = 0.058) and 64% (P = 0.004). Mean improvements were 25% (P = 0.006) and 38% (P < 0.001) on the Blepharospasm Movement Scale and 44% (P < 0.001) and 49% (P < 0.001) on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale. This series, which is the first to demonstrate a long‐term follow‐up in a large number of patients, shows that GPi DBS is a safe and highly effective therapy for Meige syndrome. The benefit is preserved for up to 6 years. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

Comparative evaluation of the potency and antigenicity of two distinct BoNT/A-derived formulations

IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin^®) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX^®) are unique botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A)-derived drugs. IncobotulinumtoxinA utilizes the naked 150 kDa holotoxin portion of BoNT/A, whereas onabotulinumtoxinA uses the complete native 900 kDa complex as drug substance. On the basis of purportedly similar pharmacological characteristics, these formulations were evaluated for potency by LD₅₀ and mouse Digit Abduction Score (DAS) bioassays. DAS was also used to assess antigenicity. Full-range DAS dose–response profiles were achieved with four lots of each product, with similar observations between lots for a given product. Between products, however, the mean DAS potency of incobotulinumtoxinA (ED₅₀ range 7.0–10.2 U/kg) was significantly lower than that of onabotulinumtoxinA (ED₅₀ range 4.4–6.4 U/kg), consistent with lower measured potencies in the LD₅₀ assay for incobotulinumtoxinA (potency range 62–82 U). In assessments of DAS duration of effect at similar unit doses, the observed lower potency of incobotulinumtoxinA translated into decreased peak efficacy and dose effect over time (i.e. shorter duration). In contrast, at equi-efficacious doses yielding near-maximal DAS responses, both toxin formulations were uniformly inhibited in a statistically significant manner when preincubated with rabbit-derived, onabotulinumtoxinA-neutralizing antibodies, supporting the position that inhibition of 150 kDa holotoxin serves as the common basis for neutralization and, therefore, incobotulinumtoxinA would not be expected to be effective in onabotulinumtoxinA-immunoresistant subjects (and vice versa). Further, with lower lot-to-lot relative potency, incobotulinumtoxinA is not dose-equivalent or interchangeable with onabotulinumtoxinA, suggesting that various aspects of drug product formulation may influence observed pharmacology.     

Efficacy and safety of oral lubiprostone in constipated patients with or without irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized,placebo‐controlled and dose‐finding study

Background Lubiprostone is a prostone analog with a novel mechanism of action involving type‐2 chloride channel activation. The aim of this work was to perform a dose‐finding study for lubiprostone for the treatment of constipation with or without irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in Japan. Methods A total of 170 patients (128 without IBS and 42 with IBS) with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) randomly received a placebo (n = 42) or 16 μg (n = 41), 32 μg (n = 43), or 48 μg (n = 44) of lubiprostone daily for 2 weeks. Key Results There was a statistically significant and dose‐dependent increase in change from baseline in the weekly average number of spontaneous bowel movements at week 1 (placebo: 1.5 ± 0.4; 16 μg: 2.3 ± 0.4, 32 μg: 3.5 ± 0.5; and 48 μg: 6.8 ± 1.1, per week, mean ± SE; P < 0.0001). These primary endpoint results were significant on stratified analysis when patients were limited to those without IBS (P < 0.0001). The primary endpoint in patients with IBS treated with 48 μg of lubiprostone was significantly better than those given placebo (P = 0.0086). Dose dependency was also seen for the secondary efficacy endpoints. Lubiprostone produced no serious side effects. Conclusions & Inferences Our results suggest that lubiprostone produced a steady and effective improvement in the symptoms of CIC with or without IBS in a dose‐dependent manner with a good safety profile and tolerability in a Japanese population.     

Efficacy and safety of NT 201 for upper limb spasticity of various etiologies – a randomized parallel‐group study

Barnes M, Schnitzler A, Medeiros L, Aguilar M, Lehnert‐Batar A, Minnasch P. Efficacy and safety of NT 201 for upper limb spasticity of various etiologies – a randomized parallel‐group study.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2010: 122: 295–302.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective – To assess efficacy and safety of two dilutions of botulinum neurotoxin type A NT 201 (Xeomin^®) in patients with upper limb spasticity of diverse etiology. Methods – Changes in functional disability and muscle tone from baseline to week 4 after NT 201 treatment. Results – One hundred ninety‐two patients with stroke, brain injury, multiple sclerosis, or cerebral palsy were randomized to either 50 or 20 U/ml NT 201 dilutions. The maximum total NT 201 dose was 495 units. Four weeks post‐injection, a ≥ 1‐point reduction was observed on the Disability Assessment Scale in 57.1%, and on the Ashworth scale in ≥ 62.2% of patients. The 20 U/ml NT 201 dilution was non‐inferior to the 50 U/ml NT 201 dilution. Global improvement was rated high by patients (80.2%) and investigators (89.0%). Conclusions – NT 201 improved functional disability and muscle tone and was well tolerated in patients with upper limb spasticity of diverse etiology in both dilutions.     

Rivastigmine for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: A placebo‐controlled study

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Parkinson's disease (PD) may be associated with subtle functional impairment and worse quality of life. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine for PD‐MCI. Patients with PD‐MCI (n = 28) were enrolled in a 24‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover, single‐site study of the rivastigmine transdermal patch. The primary outcome measure was the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study—Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS‐CGIC). Secondary outcomes included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Dementia Rating Scale‐2 (DRS‐2), Neurotrax computerized cognitive battery, the Everyday Cognition Battery (ECB), and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ‐8). Twenty‐six participants (92.9%) completed both study phase assessments, and 23 (82.1%) completed both phases on study medication. The CGIC response rate demonstrated a trend effect in favor of rivastigmine (regression coefficient for interaction term in linear mixed‐effects model = 0.44, F[df] = 3.01 [1, 24], P = 0.096). For secondary outcomes, a significant rivastigmine effect on the ECB (regression coefficient = –2.41, F[df] = 5.81 [1, 22.05], P = 0.03) was seen, but no treatment effect was found on any cognitive measures. Trend effects also occurred in favor of rivastigmine on the PDQ‐8 (regression coefficient = 4.55, F[df] = 3.93 [1, 14. 79], P = 0.09) and the State Anxiety Inventory (regression coefficient = –1.24, F[df] = 3.17 [1, 33], P = 0.08). Rivastigmine in PD‐MCI showed a trend effect for improvements on a global rating of cognition, disease‐related health status, and anxiety severity, and significant improvement on a performance‐based measure of cognitive abilities. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Reduced alpha‐synuclein in cerebrospinal fluid in synucleinopathies: Evidence from a meta‐analysis

Alpha‐synuclein plays a key role in the pathology of synucleinopathies including Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA). However, whether alpha‐synuclein level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could distinguish synucleinopathies from progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is still a contentious issue. A comprehensive literature search yielded nine eligible studies. We expressed the between‐group difference of the concentration of alpha‐synuclein in CSF as the standardized mean difference. The proportion of variation attributable to heterogeneity was computed and expressed as I². Nine studies involved 537 controls, 843 PD, 130 MSA, and 98 PSP patients. The overall effect of PD on alpha‐synuclein in CSF was significantly different from normal control or disease control (standardized mean difference = –0.67, P < 0.00001). These studies were heterogeneous (I² = 40%). Alpha‐synuclein in CSF in MSA was significantly reduced relative to controls with heterogeneous studies (standardized mean difference = –0.75, P < 0.0001; I² = 62%). In contrast, no significant difference of alpha‐synuclein in CSF was observed between PSP and controls with heterogeneous studies (standardized mean difference = –0.28, P = 0.13; I² = 53%). Alpha‐synuclein in CSF was significantly reduced in synucleinopathies compared with PSP (“PD vs. PSP”: standardized mean difference = –0.38, P = 0.001; “MSA vs. PSP”: standardized mean difference = –0.66, P < 0.00001). The included studies were homogeneous (I² = 0%). Our study showed that alpha‐synuclein levels in CSF in synucleinopathies was significantly lower than in PSP. This finding provides insights into the pathophysiological difference between synucleinopathies and PSP as well as possibility of development of a tool for differential diagnosis between MSA and PSP using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and similar methods. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Atomoxetine treatment in adults with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid social anxiety disorder

Background: To evaluate the effect of atomoxetine (ATX) on attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid social anxiety disorder in adults. Methods: Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, conducted in adults with ADHD and social anxiety disorder. Patients received 40–100 mg ATX (n=224) or placebo (n=218) for 14 weeks following a 2‐week placebo lead‐in period. Efficacy measures included the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale: Investigator‐Rated: Screening Version (CAARS:Inv:SV), Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Clinical Global Impression‐Overall‐Severity (CGI‐O‐S), State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Social Adjustment Scale‐Self Report (SAS), and Adult ADHD Quality of Life Scale‐29 (AAQoL). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: ATX mean change (?8.7±10.0) from baseline (29.6±10.4) on CAARS:Inv:SV Total ADHD Symptoms score was significantly greater than placebo mean change (?5.6±10.2) from baseline (31.2±9.4; P<.001). ATX mean change (?22.9±25.3) from baseline (85.3±23.6) on LSAS Total score was significant compared to placebo mean change (?14.4±20.3) from baseline (82.1±21.3; P<.001). The visit‐wise analysis revealed greater improvement on the CAARS:Inv:SV Total ADHD Symptoms score and LSAS Total score for ATX at every time point throughout the study (P values ≤.012). Mean changes in CGI‐O‐S, STAI‐Trait Anxiety scores, and AAQoL Total score were significantly greater for ATX compared to placebo. Mean change for both groups on STAI‐State Anxiety scores was comparable. Improvement on SAS for ATX compared to placebo was not significant. Rates of insomnia, nausea, dry mouth, and dizziness were higher with ATX than with placebo. Discontinuation rates due to treatment‐emergent adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusions: ATX monotherapy effectively improved symptoms of ADHD and comorbid social anxiety disorder in adults and was well tolerated. Depression and Anxiety, 2009. Published 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Clinical Evaluation of the Daily Assessment of Symptoms‐Anxiety (DAS‐A): A New Instrument to Assess the Onset of Symptomatic Improvement in Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Introduction: Rapid onset of symptomatic improvement is a desirable characteristic of new generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) treatments. A validated rating scale is needed to assess GAD symptoms during the first days of treatment. Aims: To provide clinical data to support the validation of the Daily Assessment of Symptoms‐Anxiety (DAS‐A), a new instrument to assess onset of symptomatic improvement in GAD. Methods: We assessed the ability of the DAS‐A to detect onset of symptomatic improvement during the first week of therapy in 169 GAD patients randomized to paroxetine 20 mg/day, lorazepam 4.5 mg/day, or placebo for 4 weeks. Results: On the primary outcome measure, average change from baseline over the first 6 days of DAS‐A assessments, lorazepam (?14.5 ± 1.8 [LS mean, SE]; P= 0.006 vs. placebo) showed a significant improvement versus placebo (?7.85 ± 1.7), whereas paroxetine (?8.3 ± 1.7; P= 0.83 vs. placebo) did not. Lorazepam produced a significant treatment effect on the DAS‐A at 24 h (P= 0.0004), whereas paroxetine did not (P= 0.5666). Both active drugs produced statistically significant improvement versus placebo on the DAS‐A total change score (last‐observation carried forward method; LOCF, endpoint). On the DAS‐A total change score (observed cases analysis), lorazepam produced statistically significant improvement versus placebo at weeks 1, 2, and 4 (P < 0.05; no week 3 visit), whereas paroxetine, separated from placebo at weeks 2 and 4 (P < 0.05). Both active drugs produced results on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM‐A) at weeks 1 through 4 that were similar to those found on the DAS‐A. Conclusions: These data indicate that the DAS‐A can detect symptomatic improvement in GAD patients treated with lorazepam during the first week of treatment, and, in a secondary analysis, as early as 24 h.     

Long-term incobotulinumtoxinA treatment for chronic sialorrhea: Efficacy and safety over 64 weeks

BackgroundBotulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is an effective treatment for chronic sialorrhea; however, reliable and robust evidence supporting long-term efficacy and safety is lacking. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA injections for chronic sialorrhea over 64 weeks.MethodsAdults with sialorrhea were randomized (2:2:1) to incobotulinumtoxinA 75 U, incobotulinumtoxinA 100 U (n = 74 each), or placebo (n = 36) in the double-blind, placebo-controlled main period (NCT02091739). Eligible subjects entered the extension period and received dose-blinded incobotulinumtoxinA 75 or 100 U in three further 16±2-week injection cycles. Efficacy and safety assessments in subjects who received incobotulinumtoxinA throughout the study included unstimulated salivary flow rate (uSFR), subjects' Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS), Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS), modified Radboud Oral Motor Inventory for Parkinson's Disease (mROMP) drooling, speech, and swallowing symptom scores, and incidence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsIn total, 173/184 subjects (94%) completed the main period and entered the extension period; 141 subjects received incobotulinumtoxinA 75 U (n = 69) or 100 U (n = 72) in both periods. Mean uSFR decreased consistently with repeated incobotulinumtoxinA 75 and 100 U treatment and by −0.16 and −0.17, respectively, at the end-of-study visit. Subjects’ GICS, DSFS, and mROMP drooling scores also improved at all assessments. mROMP speech and swallowing scores remained stable. The most common treatment-related AEs during the extension period were dry mouth (4.4% and 11.1%) and dysphagia (1.5% and 4.2%).ConclusionsData support long-term efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA treatment for sialorrhea, with no additional safety concerns reported over 64 weeks.     

Botulinum toxin modulates cortical maladaptation in post‐stroke spasticity

Introduction: Maladaptive plasticity involving the unaffected hemisphere (UH) in stroke patients may contribute to post‐stroke deficits, including spasticity. We investigated the central and peripheral effects of botulinum toxin in post‐stroke spasticity to determine whether there is modulation of cortical processes in the UH. Methods: Transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve excitability studies were undertaken in 5 stroke patients with upper limb spasticity before (T1) and 6 weeks after (T2) botulinum injection. Results: Transcranial magnetic stimulation demonstrated inexcitable motor cortices of the affected hemisphere at T1 and T2, and short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the UH was significantly reduced at T1. At T2, SICI in the UH increased significantly compared with T1, normalizing to controls, and was found to be associated with clinical improvements in spasticity. Peripheral excitability parameters were unchanged after injection. Conclusion: Cortical excitability changes were demonstrated in UH, suggesting that the clinical benefits of botulinum toxin relate to modulation of abnormal central reorganization (maladaptive plasticity) in post‐stroke spasticity. Muscle Nerve, 2013