Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Overall Survival and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival Among Men With Stage I-II Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER, 2000-2018

BackgroundMale breast cancer is a rare malignant tumor, and outcomes of breast conservation therapy (BCT) are currently lacking.MethodThe retrospective, population-based cohort study included 1369 stage I-II (T1–2 N0–1 M0) male breast cancer patients from the SEER database (2000-2018). The patients were grouped in two groups: BCT group and mastectomy group, according to surgical and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between two treatment groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the confounding factors.ResultsOf the 1369 men, 97 (7%) patients received BCT, 1272 (93%) received mastectomy alone. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 92.3% and 80.7% for BCT group compared with 80.4% and 61.4% for mastectomy group. The 5- and 10-year BCSS rates were 96.5% and 93.9% for patients undergoing BCT, as compared with 93.1% and 84.4% for patients undergoing mastectomy. Compared with mastectomy group, BCT group showed improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.294; 95% CI 0.138-0.623, P = .002) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.182; 95% CI 0.040-0.820, P = .027). Of the 791 patients with T1 stage, BCT showed insignificant association with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.555; 95% CI 0.207-1.488, P = .242) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.217; 95% CI 0.171-8.675, P = .844).ConclusionThe results of this cohort study suggest that BCT is at least equivalent to mastectomy in male breast cancer patients. The underlying mechanism of this association needs further research.     

Impact of primary local treatment on the development of distant metastases or death through locoregional recurrence in young breast cancer patients

In this study, we tested the hypothesis whether breast conserving therapy (BCT) compared with mastectomy is associated with a negative outcome in terms of distant metastases or death (DMD) and investigated the relation between locoregional recurrence (LRR) and DMD in young breast cancer (BC) patients. This study included a consecutive series of 536 patients ≤40 years of age at diagnosis with pathological T1N0-3M0 BC, treated between 1989 and 2005. A multistate survival model was used to evaluate the influences of local treatment and LRR on DMD, adjusted for potential prognostic factors. Patients were treated with mastectomy (N = 213) or BCT (N = 323). Median age at diagnosis was 36.3 years, with a median follow-up of 9.0 years. The 10-year actuarial cumulative incidence of DMD was 30.6 % after mastectomy and 26.3 % after BCT (P = 0.04). In total, 81 (15 %) LRRs were observed. After BCT, patients had a threefold higher risk of LRR than after mastectomy (HR 2.9; 95 % CI 1.6–5.3). Patients with LRR had a higher risk of DMD compared with patients without LRR (HR 5.5; 95 % CI 2.1–14.5). However, BCT was not negatively associated with DMD-after-LRR (HR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.2–1.1, BCT vs mastectomy). In conclusion, although LRR significantly affected DMD, the increased risk of LRR after BCT compared with mastectomy did not lead to a worse DMD outcome in BC patients ≤40 years of age.     

Impact of genetic variability and treatment-related factors on outcome in early breast cancer patients receiving (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil,epirubicin and cyclophosphamide,and docetaxel

To assess the impact of patient-related factors, including genetic variability in genes involved in the metabolism of chemotherapeutic agents, on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and recurrence-free interval (RFI). We selected early breast cancer patients treated between 2000 and 2010 with 4–6 cycles of (neo-)adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) or 3 cycles FEC followed by 3 cycles docetaxel. Tumor stage/subtype; febrile neutropenia and patient-related factors such as selected single nucleotide polymorphisms and baseline laboratory parameters were evaluated. Multivariable Cox regression was performed. Of 991 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.2 years, 152 (15.3 %) patients relapsed and 63 (6.4 %) patients died. Advanced stage and more aggressive subtype were associated with poorer BCSS and RFI in multivariable analysis (p < 0.0001). Associations with worse BCSS in multivariable analysis were: homozygous carriers of the rs1057910 variant C-allele in CYP2C9 (hazard ratio [HR] 30.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 6.1–151.5; p < 0.001) and higher white blood cell count (WBC) (HR 1.2; 95 % CI 1.0–1.3; p = 0.014). The GT genotype of the ABCB1 variant rs2032582 was associated with better BCSS (HR 0.5; 95 % CI 0.3–0.9, p = 0.021). Following associations with worse RFI were observed: higher WBC (HR 1.1; 95 % CI 1.0–1.2; p = 0.026), homozygous carriers of the rs1057910 variant C-allele in CYP2C9 (HR 10.9; 95 % CI 2.5–47.9; p = 0.002), CT genotype of the CYBA variant rs4673 (HR 1.8; 95 % CI 1.2–2.7; p = 0.006), and G-allele homozygosity for the UGT2B7 variant rs3924194 (HR 3.4; 95 % CI 1.2–9.7, p = 0.023). Patient-related factors including genetic variability and baseline white blood cell count, impacted on outcome in early breast cancer.     

Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND:

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) have demonstrated equivalent survival for breast‐conserving therapy with radiation (BCT) and mastectomy for early‐stage breast cancer. A large, population‐based series of women who underwent BCT or mastectomy was studied to observe whether outcomes of RCT were achieved in the general population, and whether survival differed by surgery type when stratified by age and hormone receptor (HR) status.

METHODS:

Information was obtained regarding all women diagnosed in the state of California with stage I or II breast cancer between 1990 and 2004, who were treated with either BCT or mastectomy and followed for vital status through December 2009. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) between BCT and mastectomy groups. Analyses were stratified by age group (< 50 years and ≥ 50 years) and tumor HR status.

RESULTS:

A total of 112,154 women fulfilled eligibility criteria. Women undergoing BCT had improved OS and DSS compared with women with mastectomy (adjusted hazard ratio for OS entire cohort = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80‐0.83). The DSS benefit with BCT compared with mastectomy was greater among women age ≥ 50 with HR‐positive disease (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.82‐0.91) than among women age < 50 with HR‐negative disease (hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79‐0.98); however, this trend was seen among all subgroups analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Among patients with early stage breast cancer, BCT was associated with improved DSS. These data provide confidence that BCT remains an effective alternative to mastectomy for early stage disease regardless of age or HR status. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Survival following breast-conserving therapy is equal to that following mastectomy in young women with early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma

Background

Previous observational studies reported the superior survival of patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT, lumpectomy plus postsurgical radiation) compared to that of those who underwent mastectomy. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is not the same disease as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) as it has distinct biologic features and thus requires unique consideration and research.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival: report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998–2002

The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has been increasing despite questionable survival benefit. We examined the effect of CPM on survival using the National Cancer Data Base. We examined overall survival on 219,983 mastectomy patients diagnosed with unilateral AJCC Stage 1–III invasive breast cancer between 1998 and 2002 of which 14,994 (7 %) underwent CPM at the time of their index mastectomy. Median follow up time was 5 years. Neoadjuvant and locally advanced breast cancers were excluded. Approximately 4 % underwent CPM in 1998 compared to 9.4 % in 2002, an ~125 % increase. CPM patients were significantly younger than non-CPM patients, on managed care plans, and were treated at high volume centers. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of death was 0.55 (95 % CI 0.52–0.57) for CPM compared to unilateral mastectomy. In a multivariable Cox model adjusting for age, race, stage, grade, histology, insurance, facility characteristics, use of adjuvant hormonal, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, and year of diagnosis, the adjusted HR was 0.88 (95 % CI 0.83–0.93; p < 0.001) which translated into an absolute 5-year benefit of 2 %. There was a differential effect of CPM by stage and age: HR = 0.88 (95 % CI 0.82–0.94; p < 0.001) in women younger than 70 with stage I/II, and HR = 0.95 (95 % CI 0.88–1.04; p = 0.28) in women with stage III or older than age 69 which translated into an absolute 5-year benefit of 1.3 %. Utilization of hormonal therapy or chemotherapy had no effect on the HR. After adjusting for confounding, the overall survival benefit for CPM is minimal at best.     

T1-2N0M0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Breast-Conserving Therapy Has Better Survival Compared to Mastectomy: A SEER Population-Based Retrospective Analysis

BackgroundFor early-stage breast cancer, the two current mainstay treatments are breast-conserving therapy (BCT; lumpectomy followed by radiotherapy [RT] and BCT) and mastectomy. Generally, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive compared to hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. We sought to investigate the effect of BCT compared to mastectomy on overall survival (OS) and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) in T1-2N0M0 TNBC.Patients and MethodsA population-based retrospective analysis was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients included in the analysis were divided into 3 groups according to surgical modality and RT: BCT, mastectomy alone, and mastectomy with RT. The survival end points were OS and BCSS, and survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test among treatment types.ResultsA total of 14,910 female subjects with T1-2N0M0 TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 were included. A total of 7381 patients had BCT; 6967 had mastectomy alone, and 562 had mastectomy with RT. Patients treated with BCT had better OS (log-rank P < .05) and BCSS (log-rank P < .05) than those receiving mastectomy with or without RT. The 5-year OS was 88.6% for BCT, 83.0% for mastectomy alone, and 79.6% for mastectomy with RT. The 5-year BCSS was 94.3% for BCT, 93.3% for mastectomy alone, and 83.7% for mastectomy with RT.ConclusionIn patients with T1-2N0M0 TNBC, BCT was associated with superior OS and BCSS compared to mastectomy with or without RT. After mastectomy, there was no evidence of survival benefit of RT.     

Adolescent physical activity in relation to breast cancer risk

Adolescent physical activity may protect against premenopausal breast cancer. Whether it also prevents postmenopausal breast cancer, and whether associations are independent of adult activity, is unclear. We evaluated this association among 75,669 women in the Nurses’ Health Study II. In 1997, participants reported strenuous, moderate, and walking activity (hours/week) at ages 12–13, 14–17, 18–22, and 23–29 years. We estimated metabolic equivalent task hours (MET-h)/week. Participants also reported current physical activity over follow-up. Breast cancer diagnoses (n = 2,697; premenopausal = 1,351; postmenopausal = 965) through 2011 were reported by participants and confirmed with medical records. We additionally stratified analyses by median age at diagnosis. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for adolescent characteristics, physical activity from ages 14–22 was modestly inversely associated with premenopausal breast cancer [e.g., hazard ratio (HR) comparing 72+ to <21 MET-h/week 0.81 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.95; p-trend = 0.10) for ages 14–17 and 0.85 (95 % CI 0.71–1.02; p-trend = 0.06 for ages 18–22]. However, adjustment for adult activity and additional breast cancer risk factors attenuated the associations [ages 14–17: 0.85 (95 % CI 0.73–1.00; p-trend = 0.33)]. Associations were stronger among women diagnosed at younger ages [e.g., ages 18–22, HR 0.77 (95 % CI 0.60–0.99; p-trend = 0.05) for women diagnosed before 46.9 years; HR 1.02 (95 % CI 0.79–1.32; p-trend = 0.94) for those diagnosed at/after 46.9 years]. Early life physical activity was not associated with postmenopausal breast cancer. Overall, adolescent physical activity was not associated with breast cancer risk. However, we observed a suggestive inverse association of physical activity at ages 14–22 years with premenopausal breast cancer.     

Patient characteristics and overall survival in patients with post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the community setting

It is unclear how treatment sequencing for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) affects real-world patient outcomes. We assessed treatment sequences, patient characteristics and overall survival (OS) in post-docetaxel mCRPC patients. mCRPC patients receiving second-line cabazitaxel or androgen receptor-targeted therapy (ART; abiraterone/enzalutamide) post-docetaxel were identified using electronic medical records. OS was assessed from second-line therapy initiation using Cox regressions adjusting for: metastases; prostate-specific antigen (PSA); hemoglobin; alkaline phosphatase (ALP); albumin; second-line therapy initiation year. Following docetaxel (n = 629), 123 (19.6%) and 506 (80.4%) patients received cabazitaxel and ART, respectively. One hundred and ninety-five patients received additional treatments thereafter (54 following cabazitaxel; 141 following ART). Although patients receiving second-line cabazitaxel versus ART had similar disease characteristics at first-line therapy initiation, at second-line therapy initiation they had higher mean PSA (386.6 vs. 233.9 ng/mL) and ALP (182.0 vs. 167.3 u/L), lower mean hemoglobin (10.8 vs. 11.5 g/dL), and more frequently had intermediate/high-risk Halabi scores (61.8 vs. 48.4%); all p < 0.05. Overall, crude survival was not significantly different. Among Halabi high-risk patients, adjusted median OS was significantly longer in patients receiving cabazitaxel versus ART (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.24–0.93; p = 0.030). Low albumin and hemoglobin led to similar findings (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23–0.80; p = 0.0077; HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.40–0.90; p = 0.014). Most post-docetaxel patients received second-line ART. Patients receiving second-line cabazitaxel had more high-risk features; however, second-line cabazitaxel administered after docetaxel may improve OS in patients with Halabi high-risk scores or low albumin/hemoglobin.     

Long-term Survival Comparison of Repeated Breast-conserving Surgery Versus Mastectomy for Patients with DCIS with Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: A Real-world Longitudinal Study

BackgroundAlthough patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) harbor excellent overall survival (OS) after breast-conserving therapy, the evidence regarding to surgical management for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is scarce. This study aimed to assess the prognosis of repeated breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy for IBTR in DCIS survivors.Materials and MethodsHerein, 5344 DCIS cases with IBTR were identified during 702,748 person-years of follow-up, 3532 (66.09%) received mastectomy, and 1812 (33.91%) received repeated BCS. Cox regression and competing risk regression were employed to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS), which was respectively calculated within spontaneous and matched cohorts.ResultsAfter adjustment for confounders, no statistically significant survival difference was observed between the repeated BCS and mastectomy for patients with DCIS with IBTR. The stratified analyses further revealed that patients with DCIS with IBTR receiving repeated BCS combined with radiation therapy were associated with both superior OS (HR, 0.79; CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .04) and BCSS (HR, 0.54; CI, 0.33-0.90; P = .02) compared with counterparts undergoing mastectomy. Furthermore, patients with DCIS who were age older than 60 years at IBTR diagnosis benefit from repeated BCS with radiotherapy (HR, 0.44; CI, 0.24-0.84; P = .01) than mastectomy.ConclusionWe suggest that repeated BCS with radiation therapy deserves consideration when DCIS survivors suffered IBTR. The choice of surgical management should be tailored based on patients’ age at IBTR diagnosis and size of recurrent disease.     

Evaluating cognitive complaints in breast cancer survivors with the FACT-Cog and quantitative electroencephalography

Purpose

In contrast to other countries, the Dutch breast cancer guideline does not recommend re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in invasive tumor and does recommend whole-breast irradiation including boost. We investigated whether omitting re-excision as compared to performing re-excision affects prognosis with a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Methods

The total cohort included 32,119 women with primary BCS for T1–T3 breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2008 from the nationwide Netherlands cancer registry. The subcohort included 10,433 patients in whom the resection margins were registered. Outcome measures were 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and 10-year overall survival (OS) rate.

Results

In the total cohort, 25,878 (80.6%) did not have re-excision, 2368 (7.4%) had re-excision by BCS, and 3873 (12.1%) had re-excision by mastectomy. Five-year IBTR rates were 2.1, 2.8, and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.001). In the subcohort, 7820 (75.0%) had negative margins without re-excision, 492 (4.7%) had focally positive margins without re-excision, 586 (5.6%) had focally positive margins and underwent re-excision, and 1535 (14.7%) had extensively positive margins and underwent re-excision. Five-year IBTR rate was 2.3, 2.9, 1.1, and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.099). Compared to omitting re-excision, performing re-excision for focally positive margins was associated with lower risk of IBTR (adjusted HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11–0.82), but not with DFS (adjusted HR 0.83 95% CI 0.59–1.17) nor with OS (adjusted HR 1.17 95% CI 0.87–1.59).

Conclusion

Omitting re-excision in breast cancer patients for focally positive margins after BCS does not impair DFS and OS, provided that whole-breast irradiation including boost is given.

     

Racial disparities in treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Data characterizing demographics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in black patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are limited. registHER is a large, observational cohort study of patients (n = 1,001) with HER2-positive MBC diagnosed ≤6 months of enrollment and followed until death, disenrollment, or June 2009 (median follow-up of 27 months). Demographics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were described for black (n = 126) and white patients (n = 793). Progression-free survival (PFS) following first-line therapy and overall survival (OS) were examined. Multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline and treatment factors. Black patients were more likely than white patients to be obese (body mass index ≥30), to have diabetes, and to have a history of cardiovascular disease; they were also less likely to have estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor positive disease. In patients treated with trastuzumab, the incidence of cardiac safety events (grade ≥3) was higher in black patients (10.9 %) than in white patients (7.9 %). Unadjusted median OS and PFS (months) were significantly lower in black patients than in white patients (OS: black: 27.1, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 21.3–32.1; white: 37.3, 95 % CI 34.6–41.1; PFS: black: 7.0, 95 % CI 5.7–8.2; white: 10.2, 95 % CI 9.3–11.2). The adjusted OS hazard ratio (HR) for black patients compared with white patients was 1.29 (95 % CI 1.00–1.65); adjusted PFS HR was 1.29 (95 % CI 1.05–1.59). This real-world evaluation of a large cohort of patients with HER2-positive MBC shows poorer prognostic factors and independently worse clinical outcomes in black versus white patients. Further research is needed to identify potential biologic differences that could have predictive impact for black patients or that could explain these differences.     

High risk of in-breast tumor recurrence after BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer

The purpose of the study was to compare breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy (M) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Women with invasive breast cancer and a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were included in the study (n = 162). Patients treated with BCT (n = 45) were compared with patients treated with M (n = 118). Endpoints were local recurrence as first recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS), breast cancer death, and distant recurrence. Cumulative incidence was calculated in the presence of competing risks. For calculation of hazard ratios and for multivariable analysis, cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression was used. Compared to M, BCT was associated with an increased risk of LR in univariable analysis (HR 4.0; 95 % CI 1.6–9.8) and in multivariable analysis adjusting for tumor stage, age, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.9; CI 1.1–7.8). Following M, all local recurrences were seen in the first 5 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Following BCT, the rate of LR continued to be high also after the first 5 years. The cumulative incidence of LR in the BCT group was 15, 25, and 32 % after 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between BCT and M for OS, breast cancer death, or distant recurrence. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers treated with BCT have a high risk of LR, many of which are new primary breast cancers. This must be thoroughly discussed with the patient and is an example of how rapid treatment-focused genetic testing could influence choice of treatment.     

Prognosis of gastric carcinoma patients aged 85 years or older who underwent surgery or who received best supportive care only

Background

There is controversy regarding strategies for treating very elderly patients with gastric carcinoma. We aimed to assess survival after surgery in very elderly patients according to their clinical characteristics.

Methods

Gastric cancer patients aged ≥85 years were retrospectively reviewed. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between 58 patients with curative resection (OP group) and 32 patients with best supportive care alone (BSC group) in cancer stage IA–IIIC and with a performance status of 0–3.

Results

Overall survival (OS) was significantly better in the OP group than in the BSC group in females [hazard ratio (HR) 0.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.12–0.57, P < 0.001] but not in males (HR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.35–1.49, P = 0.35). OS was significantly better in the OP group in patients aged 85–89 years (HR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.25–0.78, P = 0.006) but not in patients aged ≥90 years (HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.12–1.66, P = 0.24). OS was significantly better in the OP group in patients with stage IB–IIIC cancer (HR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.14–0.58, P < 0.001) but not in patients with stage IA cancer (HR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.21–1.27, P = 0.15).

Conclusions

Females, patients aged 85–89 years, and patients with stage IB–IIIC cancer had significantly better OS with surgery than without. For males, patients aged ≥90 years, or stage IA patients, the decision to perform surgery should be carefully made, and BSC might be an optimal strategy.     

Prognostic factors affecting survival in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 110 patients

Background

Data on treatment outcome and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are limited in the literature.

Methods

A total of 119 patients with metastatic STS treated between June 2003 and December 2012 were analyzed for treatment outcome and prognostic factors.

Results

Median age was 37 years (range 2–72 years) with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. Most common histologic subtypes were synovial sarcoma (36 %) and leiomyosarcoma (16 %). Median tumor size was 12 cm (range 1.6–30 cm). Twenty-four (20 %) patients were treated with multimodality therapy and 80 % patients received systemic chemotherapy alone. At a median follow-up of 10 months (range 1–66 months), the 2-year EFS and OS were 10 and 19 %, respectively, with a median EFS and OS of 6 and 10 months, respectively. Univariate analysis identified albumin ≤4 g/dl (p = 0.001), histologic subtypes other than synovial sarcoma (p = 0.02), non-extremity tumors (p = 0.03) and single modality treatment (p = 0.03) as factors predicting poor EFS; however, for OS, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dl (p = 0.02), tumor size >10 cm (p = 0.01) and single modality treatment (p = 0.04) were identified as poor prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis identified only serum albumin ≤4 g/dl (p = 0.002, HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.29–0.75) associated with poor EFS; however, for OS, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dl (p = 0.009, HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.29–0.83), tumor size >10 cm (p = 0.003, HR 2.11, 95 % CI 1.28–3.47) and single modality treatment (p = 0.01, HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.25–0.86) emerged as poor prognostic factors.

Conclusions

Serum albumin, tumor size, hemoglobin and treatment modality affect survival in metastatic STS.

     

Prognostic role of D-dimer in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis

D-dimer detection in patients suffering from a variety of different types of cancer has become a hot point as an emerging and promising biomarker. In this study, therefore, we evaluated the prognostic role of D-dimer in lung cancer. Initial literature was identified using the PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI. The primary data was hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) of survival outcomes in candidate articles, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Finally, 11 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis, which were published between 1996 and 2013. The estimated pooled HR and 95 % CI for OS of all studies was 2.06 (95 % CI 1.64–2.58, p?<?0.00001) and the HR and 95 % CI for DFS in one study was 3.38 (95 % CI 1.17–9.75, p?=?0.002). The HRs and 95 % CIs for OS in Asian and non-Asian patients were 2.48 (95 % CI 1.60–3.84, p?<?0.0001) and 1.89 (95 % CI 1.44–2.47, p?<?0.00001), respectively. When we further analyzed the data by various detecting methods, the pooled HR and 95 % CI for OS were 3.22 (95 % CI 1.99–5.21, p?<?0.00001) for ELISA, 1.52 (95 % CI 1.25–1.86, p?<?0.0001) for Latex assay, and 1.79 (95 % CI 1.19–2.69, p?=?0.005) for immunoturbidimetry assay. We also did subgroup analysis according to the ratio of histological type and clinical stage. All the above analysis had positive results. This meta-analysis showed that D-dimer had a fine predictive role in lung cancer patients, especially in Asian group. Also, it demonstrated that D-dimer had a stronger predictive value by using the method ELISA.     

Comparison of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy and mastectomy alone for breast cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes between immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy and mastectomy alone.

Prognostic paradox: brain damage around the glioblastoma resection cavity

Hyperintense lesions around the resection cavity on magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) frequently appear after brain tumor surgery due to the damage of surrounding brain. The putative connection between the lesion and the prognosis for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) was explored. This retrospective study reviewed consecutive sixty-one patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Postoperative MRI was performed within 2 weeks after the initial surgery. We classified the cases into two groups depending on whether DWI hyperintense lesions were observed or not [DWI(+) group and DWI(?) group]. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Forty-two patients were identified. The various extents of hyperintense lesions around the resection cavity were observed in 28/42 (66.7 %) cases. In the DWI(+) and DWI(?) groups, median PFS was 10.0 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 8.4–11.5] and 6.7 (95 % CI 4.9–8.5) months, respectively (p = 0.042), and median OS was 18.0 (95 % CI 12.2–23.8) and 17.0 (95 % CI 15.7–18.3) months, respectively (p = 0.254). On multivariate analysis, the presence of DWI hyperintense lesion was more likely to be an independent predictor for 6-month PFS (p = 0.019; HR, 0.038; 95 % CI 0.002–0.582). Tumor recurrence appeared outside the former DWI hyperintense lesion. Hyperintense lesions surrounding the resected GBM on MR-DWI might be a favorable prognostic factor in patients with GBM.     

Long-term impact of the 70-gene signature on breast cancer outcome

Several studies have validated the prognostic value of the 70-gene prognosis signature (MammaPrint^R), but long-term outcome prediction of these patients has not been previously reported. The follow-up of the consecutively treated cohort of 295 patients (<53 years) with invasive breast cancer (T1-2N0-1M0; n = 151 N0, n = 144 N1) diagnosed between 1984 and 1995, in which the 70-gene signature was previously validated, was updated. The median follow-up for this series is now extended to 18.5 years. A significant difference is seen in long-term distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for the patients with a low- and a high-risk 70-gene signature (DMFS p < 0.0001), as well as separately for node-negative (DMFS p < 0.0001) and node-positive patients (DMFS p = 0.0004). The 25-year hazard ratios (HRs) for all patients for DMFS and OS were 3.1 (95 % CI 2.02–4.86) and 2.9 (95 % CI 1.90–4.28), respectively. The HRs for DMFS and OS were largest in the first 5 years after diagnosis: 9.6 (95 % CI 4.2–22.1) and 11.3 (95 % CI 3.5–36.4), respectively. The 25-year HRs in the subgroup of node-negative patients for DMFS and OS were 4.57 (95 % CI 2.31–9.04) and 4.73 (95 % CI 2.46–9.07), respectively, and for node-positive patients for DMFS and OS were 2.24 (95 % CI 1.25–4.00) and 1.83 (95 % CI 1.07–3.11), respectively. The 70-gene signature remains prognostic at longer follow-up in patients <53 years of age with stage I and II breast cancer. The 70-gene signature’s strongest prognostic power is seen in the first 5 years after diagnosis.     

Long-term prognosis of early-onset breast cancer in a population-based cohort with a known BRCA1/2 mutation status

All women in the South Sweden Health Care Region with breast cancer diagnosed aged less than 41 during the period between 1990 and 1995 were contacted in 1996 and offered germline mutation analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Mutation carriers (n = 20) were compared with noncarriers (n = 201) for overall survival (OS) and risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Mutation carriers were younger at diagnosis and more likely to have ER-negative, PgR-negative and grade III tumors. Median follow-up was 19 years. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year OS were 60, 45, 39, and 39 % for mutation carriers and 82, 70, 59, and 53 % for noncarriers, respectively (5-year log-rank P = 0.013; 10-year P = 0.008; 15-year P = 0.020; and 20-year P = 0.046). In univariable analysis, there was a trend for an inferior OS for mutation carriers (HR 1.8; 95 % CI 1.0–3.3). When stratified for use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, an inferior OS was significant only for the subgroup of patients who did not receive chemotherapy (HR 3.0; 95 % CI 1.2–7.7). In multivarible analysis, BRCA1/2 mutation status was a significant predictor of OS when adjusting for tumor stage, age, and use of chemotherapy, but not when ER status was also included in the model. The 15-year cumulative risk of CBC was 53 % for mutation carriers and 10 % for noncarriers (HR 5.9; 95 % CI 1.9–18.6); among the noncarriers the risks were 5, 22, and 30 % for patients without close relatives having breast cancer, with second-degree relatives having breast cancer, and with firstdegree relatives with breast cancer, respectively. In conclusion, the poor prognosis of young BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer is mainly explained by the prevalent occurrence of negative prognostic factors rather than mutation status per se, and can to at least some extent be abrogated by the use of chemotherapy.